* Testing with Bluestore and Filestore @ 2017-03-02 16:36 Brett Niver 2017-03-02 18:36 ` Gregory Farnum 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Brett Niver @ 2017-03-02 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sage Weil, Jason Dillaman, ceph-devel Sage, Perhaps this has already been discussed, but Jason had a good idea, that perhaps instead of testing both BS and FS upstream independently, and doubling our testing, we might have teuthology randomly pick which to use. That would potentially reduce TCs and also give us the testing that would help prepare for working thru the migration/transition once BS is ready. Brett ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Testing with Bluestore and Filestore 2017-03-02 16:36 Testing with Bluestore and Filestore Brett Niver @ 2017-03-02 18:36 ` Gregory Farnum 2017-03-02 18:40 ` Jason Dillaman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Gregory Farnum @ 2017-03-02 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Brett Niver, John Spray; +Cc: Sage Weil, Jason Dillaman, ceph-devel On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Brett Niver <bniver@redhat.com> wrote: > Sage, > > Perhaps this has already been discussed, but Jason had a good idea, > that perhaps instead of testing both BS and FS upstream independently, > and doubling our testing, we might have teuthology randomly pick > which to use. > > That would potentially reduce TCs and also give us the testing that > would help prepare for working thru the migration/transition once BS > is ready. This is really what the subset functionality is for, although I think John had started working on a feature in this area that would let the subset functionality go across the rados configuration options while guaranteeing full combinatorial explosion on the FS tests. -Greg > > Brett > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Testing with Bluestore and Filestore 2017-03-02 18:36 ` Gregory Farnum @ 2017-03-02 18:40 ` Jason Dillaman 2017-03-02 20:02 ` Mark Nelson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Jason Dillaman @ 2017-03-02 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gregory Farnum; +Cc: Brett Niver, John Spray, Sage Weil, ceph-devel On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Brett Niver <bniver@redhat.com> wrote: >> Sage, >> >> Perhaps this has already been discussed, but Jason had a good idea, >> that perhaps instead of testing both BS and FS upstream independently, >> and doubling our testing, we might have teuthology randomly pick >> which to use. >> >> That would potentially reduce TCs and also give us the testing that >> would help prepare for working thru the migration/transition once BS >> is ready. > > This is really what the subset functionality is for, although I think > John had started working on a feature in this area that would let the > subset functionality go across the rados configuration options while > guaranteeing full combinatorial explosion on the FS tests. > -Greg I was actually thinking that OSDs should be randomly assigned an object store by teuthology (i.e. roughly 50% FileStore vs 50% BlueStore in the same cluster in the same test run). Right now, the tests (at least for RBD) running 100% FileStore or 100% BlueStore with no intermixing (and no verification that PGs comprised of FileStore and BlueStore OSDs behave properly). That would also have the added benefit of eliminating half the test cases in the RBD suite even before you apply a subset. >> >> Brett >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Jason ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Testing with Bluestore and Filestore 2017-03-02 18:40 ` Jason Dillaman @ 2017-03-02 20:02 ` Mark Nelson 2017-03-02 20:20 ` Sage Weil 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Mark Nelson @ 2017-03-02 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dillaman, Gregory Farnum; +Cc: Brett Niver, John Spray, Sage Weil, ceph-devel On 03/02/2017 12:40 PM, Jason Dillaman wrote: > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@redhat.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Brett Niver <bniver@redhat.com> wrote: >>> Sage, >>> >>> Perhaps this has already been discussed, but Jason had a good idea, >>> that perhaps instead of testing both BS and FS upstream independently, >>> and doubling our testing, we might have teuthology randomly pick >>> which to use. >>> >>> That would potentially reduce TCs and also give us the testing that >>> would help prepare for working thru the migration/transition once BS >>> is ready. >> >> This is really what the subset functionality is for, although I think >> John had started working on a feature in this area that would let the >> subset functionality go across the rados configuration options while >> guaranteeing full combinatorial explosion on the FS tests. >> -Greg > > I was actually thinking that OSDs should be randomly assigned an > object store by teuthology (i.e. roughly 50% FileStore vs 50% > BlueStore in the same cluster in the same test run). Right now, the > tests (at least for RBD) running 100% FileStore or 100% BlueStore with > no intermixing (and no verification that PGs comprised of FileStore > and BlueStore OSDs behave properly). That would also have the added > benefit of eliminating half the test cases in the RBD suite even > before you apply a subset. Seems reasonable to me. If the clusters are small we'll get pure bluestore and pure filestore every once and a while too which would be good. Mark > >>> >>> Brett >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Testing with Bluestore and Filestore 2017-03-02 20:02 ` Mark Nelson @ 2017-03-02 20:20 ` Sage Weil 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Sage Weil @ 2017-03-02 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Nelson; +Cc: dillaman, Gregory Farnum, Brett Niver, John Spray, ceph-devel On Thu, 2 Mar 2017, Mark Nelson wrote: > On 03/02/2017 12:40 PM, Jason Dillaman wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Brett Niver <bniver@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Sage, > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has already been discussed, but Jason had a good idea, > > > > that perhaps instead of testing both BS and FS upstream independently, > > > > and doubling our testing, we might have teuthology randomly pick > > > > which to use. > > > > > > > > That would potentially reduce TCs and also give us the testing that > > > > would help prepare for working thru the migration/transition once BS > > > > is ready. > > > > > > This is really what the subset functionality is for, although I think > > > John had started working on a feature in this area that would let the > > > subset functionality go across the rados configuration options while > > > guaranteeing full combinatorial explosion on the FS tests. > > > -Greg > > > > I was actually thinking that OSDs should be randomly assigned an > > object store by teuthology (i.e. roughly 50% FileStore vs 50% > > BlueStore in the same cluster in the same test run). Right now, the > > tests (at least for RBD) running 100% FileStore or 100% BlueStore with > > no intermixing (and no verification that PGs comprised of FileStore > > and BlueStore OSDs behave properly). That would also have the added > > benefit of eliminating half the test cases in the RBD suite even > > before you apply a subset. > > Seems reasonable to me. If the clusters are small we'll get pure bluestore > and pure filestore every once and a while too which would be good. Yeah, we can add a 'random' option that will pick between filestore or bluestore. I'm inclined to keep them separate in rados so that we can identify failures easily, but for other suites this probably makes sense. s ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-03-02 20:27 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-03-02 16:36 Testing with Bluestore and Filestore Brett Niver 2017-03-02 18:36 ` Gregory Farnum 2017-03-02 18:40 ` Jason Dillaman 2017-03-02 20:02 ` Mark Nelson 2017-03-02 20:20 ` Sage Weil
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.