* Re: Re: File System shootout...
@ 2003-10-10 11:55 ` Dieter =?unknown-8bit?q?N=FCtzel?=
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: linux-kernel-owner @ 2003-10-10 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nikita; +Cc: linux-kernel, mikeb, Reiserfs-List
> Mike Benoit writes:
> > To all those who are interested, here are the results of the benchmarks
> > I've been running over the last week between all the major file systems
> > (and there different mount options) using both Bonnie++ and IOzone. More
> > tests are currently underway, so the results will be updated as they
> > come in.
> >
> > Hopefully these results will give you a good comparative overview of each of the
> > different file systems strengths and weaknesses.
> >
> > http://fsbench.netnation.com/
>
> I should probably add that I am getting quite different bonnie++ results
> for reiser4 vs. ext3:
>
> on the box with 128M of ram:
Why no numbers for ReiserFS 3.xx plus data-logging patch (odered/journal/writeback, e.g. current code) like ext3?
Greetings,
Dieter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: File System shootout...
@ 2003-10-10 11:55 ` Dieter =?unknown-8bit?q?N=FCtzel?=
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dieter =?unknown-8bit?q?N=FCtzel?= @ 2003-10-10 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nikita; +Cc: linux-kernel, mikeb, Reiserfs-List
> Mike Benoit writes:
> > To all those who are interested, here are the results of the benchmarks
> > I've been running over the last week between all the major file systems
> > (and there different mount options) using both Bonnie++ and IOzone. More
> > tests are currently underway, so the results will be updated as they
> > come in.
> >
> > Hopefully these results will give you a good comparative overview of each of the
> > different file systems strengths and weaknesses.
> >
> > http://fsbench.netnation.com/
>
> I should probably add that I am getting quite different bonnie++ results
> for reiser4 vs. ext3:
>
> on the box with 128M of ram:
Why no numbers for ReiserFS 3.xx plus data-logging patch (odered/journal/writeback, e.g. current code) like ext3?
Greetings,
Dieter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: File System shootout...
2003-10-10 11:55 ` Dieter =?unknown-8bit?q?N=FCtzel?=
(?)
@ 2003-10-14 21:15 ` Mike Benoit
2004-02-16 13:23 ` Dieter Nützel
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mike Benoit @ 2003-10-14 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dieter Nützel; +Cc: Nikita, Reiserfs-List
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 04:55, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > Mike Benoit writes:
> > > To all those who are interested, here are the results of the benchmarks
> > > I've been running over the last week between all the major file systems
> > > (and there different mount options) using both Bonnie++ and IOzone. More
> > > tests are currently underway, so the results will be updated as they
> > > come in.
> > >
> > > Hopefully these results will give you a good comparative overview of each of the
> > > different file systems strengths and weaknesses.
> > >
> > > http://fsbench.netnation.com/
> >
> > I should probably add that I am getting quite different bonnie++ results
> > for reiser4 vs. ext3:
> >
> > on the box with 128M of ram:
>
> Why no numbers for ReiserFS 3.xx plus data-logging patch (odered/journal/writeback, e.g. current code) like ext3?
>
Do you have a link to the 2.6.0-test5+ data-logging patch?
> Greetings,
> Dieter
--
Best Regards,
Mike Benoit
NetNation Communications Inc.
Systems Engineer
Tel: 604-684-6892 or 888-983-6600
---------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are my own and not
necessarily those of my employer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: File System shootout...
2003-10-14 21:15 ` Mike Benoit
@ 2004-02-16 13:23 ` Dieter Nützel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dieter Nützel @ 2004-02-16 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mikeb; +Cc: reiserfs-list
Am Dienstag, 14. Oktober 2003 23:15 schrieb Mike Benoit:
> On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 04:55, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > > Mike Benoit writes:
> > > > To all those who are interested, here are the results of the
> > > > benchmarks I've been running over the last week between all the
> > > > major file systems (and there different mount options) using both
> > > > Bonnie++ and IOzone. More tests are currently underway, so the
> > > > results will be updated as they come in.
> > > >
> > > > Hopefully these results will give you a good comparative overview of
> > > > each of the different file systems strengths and weaknesses.
> > > >
> > > > http://fsbench.netnation.com/
> > >
> > > I should probably add that I am getting quite different bonnie++
> > > results for reiser4 vs. ext3:
> > >
> > > on the box with 128M of ram:
> >
> > Why no numbers for ReiserFS 3.xx plus data-logging patch
> > (odered/journal/writeback, e.g. current code) like ext3?
>
> Do you have a link to the 2.6.0-test5+ data-logging patch?
v3 experimental data=ordered and logging speedups for 2.6.1
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=reiserfs&m=107453067611552&w=2
And following posts.
Hope it's not too late or double post...;-)
Running very well with SuSE's 9.0 2.6.2-6 on RAID0 and RAID1, U320 15k.
Cheers,
Dieter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-16 13:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-10 11:55 Re: File System shootout linux-kernel-owner
2003-10-10 11:55 ` Dieter =?unknown-8bit?q?N=FCtzel?=
2003-10-14 21:15 ` Mike Benoit
2004-02-16 13:23 ` Dieter Nützel
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.