All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei.yes@gmail.com>,
	Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	konrad.wilk@oracle.com, robert.moore@intel.com,
	lv.zheng@intel.com, rjw@sisk.pl, lenb@kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@zytor.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, trenn@suse.de, yinghai@kernel.org,
	jiang.liu@huawei.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com,
	isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com,
	mgorman@suse.de, minchan@kernel.org, mina86@mina86.com,
	gong.chen@linux.intel.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com,
	lwoodman@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com, jweiner@redhat.com,
	prarit@redhat.com, zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com,
	yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86, acpi: Move acpi_initrd_override() earlier.
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:17:41 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1377209861.10300.756.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130822212111.GF3490@mtj.dyndns.org>

Hello Tejun,

On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 17:21 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
 :
> > Local page table and memory hotplug are two separate things.  That is,
> > local page tables can be supported on all NUMA platforms without hotplug
> > support.  Are you sure huge mapping will solve everything for all types
> > of applications, and therefore local page tables won't be needed at all?
> 
> When you throw around terms like "all" and "at all", you can't reach
> rational discussion about engineering trade-offs.  I was asking you
> whether it was reasonable to do per-node page table when most machines
> support huge page mappings which makes the whole thing rather
> pointless.  Of course there will be some niche cases where this might
> not be optimal but do you think that would be enough to justify the
> added complexity and churn?  If you think so, can you please
> elaborate?

I am relatively new to Linux, so I am not a good person to elaborate
this.  From my experience on other OS, huge pages helped for the kernel,
but did not necessarily help user applications.  It depended on
applications, which were not niche cases.  But Linux may be different,
so I asked since you seemed confident.  I'd appreciate if you can point
us some data that endorses your statement.

> > When someone changes the page table init code, who will test it with the
> > special allocation code?
> 
> What are you worrying about?  Are you saying that allocating page
> table towards top or bottom of memory would be more disruptive and
> difficult to debug than pulling in ACPI init and SRAT information into
> the process?  Am I missing something here?

My worry is that the code is unlikely tested with the special logic when
someone makes code changes to the page tables.  Such code can easily be
broken in future.

To answer your other question/email, I believe Tang's next step is to
support local page tables.  This is why we think pursing SRAT earlier is
the right direction.

Thanks,
-Toshi


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei.yes@gmail.com>,
	Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	konrad.wilk@oracle.com, robert.moore@intel.com,
	lv.zheng@intel.com, rjw@sisk.pl, lenb@kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@zytor.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, trenn@suse.de, yinghai@kernel.org,
	jiang.liu@huawei.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com,
	isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com,
	mgorman@suse.de, minchan@kernel.org, mina86@mina86.com,
	gong.chen@linux.intel.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com,
	lwoodman@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com, jweiner@redhat.com,
	prarit@redhat.com, zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com,
	yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86, acpi: Move acpi_initrd_override() earlier.
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:17:41 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1377209861.10300.756.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130822212111.GF3490@mtj.dyndns.org>

Hello Tejun,

On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 17:21 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
 :
> > Local page table and memory hotplug are two separate things.  That is,
> > local page tables can be supported on all NUMA platforms without hotplug
> > support.  Are you sure huge mapping will solve everything for all types
> > of applications, and therefore local page tables won't be needed at all?
> 
> When you throw around terms like "all" and "at all", you can't reach
> rational discussion about engineering trade-offs.  I was asking you
> whether it was reasonable to do per-node page table when most machines
> support huge page mappings which makes the whole thing rather
> pointless.  Of course there will be some niche cases where this might
> not be optimal but do you think that would be enough to justify the
> added complexity and churn?  If you think so, can you please
> elaborate?

I am relatively new to Linux, so I am not a good person to elaborate
this.  From my experience on other OS, huge pages helped for the kernel,
but did not necessarily help user applications.  It depended on
applications, which were not niche cases.  But Linux may be different,
so I asked since you seemed confident.  I'd appreciate if you can point
us some data that endorses your statement.

> > When someone changes the page table init code, who will test it with the
> > special allocation code?
> 
> What are you worrying about?  Are you saying that allocating page
> table towards top or bottom of memory would be more disruptive and
> difficult to debug than pulling in ACPI init and SRAT information into
> the process?  Am I missing something here?

My worry is that the code is unlikely tested with the special logic when
someone makes code changes to the page tables.  Such code can easily be
broken in future.

To answer your other question/email, I believe Tang's next step is to
support local page tables.  This is why we think pursing SRAT earlier is
the right direction.

Thanks,
-Toshi

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-22 22:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 116+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-21 10:15 [PATCH 0/8] x86, acpi: Move acpi_initrd_override() earlier Tang Chen
2013-08-21 10:15 ` Tang Chen
2013-08-21 10:15 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86: Make get_ramdisk_{image|size}() global Tang Chen
2013-08-21 10:15   ` Tang Chen
2013-08-21 10:15 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86, microcode: Use get_ramdisk_{image|size}() in microcode handling Tang Chen
2013-08-21 10:15   ` Tang Chen
2013-08-21 10:15 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86, acpi: Move table_sigs[] to stack Tang Chen
2013-08-21 10:15   ` Tang Chen
2013-08-21 10:15 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86, acpi, brk: Extend BRK 256KB to store acpi override tables Tang Chen
2013-08-21 10:15   ` Tang Chen
2013-08-21 10:15 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86, brk: Make extend_brk() available with va/pa Tang Chen
2013-08-21 10:15   ` Tang Chen
2013-08-21 12:26   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-08-21 12:26     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-08-21 12:35     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-21 12:35       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-21 14:42       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-08-21 14:42         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-08-21 15:04         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-21 15:04           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-21 10:15 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86, acpi: Make acpi_initrd_override() available with va or pa Tang Chen
2013-08-21 10:15   ` Tang Chen
2013-08-21 10:15 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86, acpi, brk: Make early_alloc_acpi_override_tables_buf() available with va/pa Tang Chen
2013-08-21 10:15   ` Tang Chen
2013-08-21 10:15 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86, acpi: Do acpi_initrd_override() earlier in head_32.S/head64.c Tang Chen
2013-08-21 10:15   ` Tang Chen
2013-08-21 10:42 ` [PATCH 0/8] x86, acpi: Move acpi_initrd_override() earlier Tang Chen
2013-08-21 10:42   ` Tang Chen
2013-08-21 13:06 ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-21 13:06   ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-21 15:00   ` Zhang Yanfei
2013-08-21 15:00     ` Zhang Yanfei
2013-08-21 15:36     ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-21 15:36       ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-21 19:31       ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-21 19:31         ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-21 19:54         ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-21 19:54           ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-21 20:29           ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-21 20:29             ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-21 20:40             ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-21 20:40               ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-21 22:36               ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-21 22:36                 ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-22  3:32                 ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-22  3:32                   ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-22 15:52                   ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-22 15:52                     ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-22 18:31                     ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-22 18:31                       ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-22 19:39                       ` Zhang Yanfei
2013-08-22 19:39                         ` Zhang Yanfei
2013-08-22 19:45                         ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-22 19:45                           ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-22 20:11                       ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-22 20:11                         ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-22 20:21                         ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-22 20:21                           ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-22 20:35                           ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-22 20:35                             ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-22 21:06                           ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-22 21:06                             ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-22 21:21                             ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-22 21:21                               ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-22 22:17                               ` Toshi Kani [this message]
2013-08-22 22:17                                 ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-23 13:04                                 ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-23 13:04                                   ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-23 13:08                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-23 13:08                                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-23 14:19                                     ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-23 14:19                                       ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-23 14:24                                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-23 14:24                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-23 14:24                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-23 14:35                                         ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-23 14:35                                           ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-23 14:57                                           ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-23 14:57                                             ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-23 16:14                                   ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-23 16:14                                     ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-23 16:24                                     ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-23 16:24                                       ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-23 17:13                                       ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-23 17:13                                         ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-23 17:29                                         ` Zhang Yanfei
2013-08-23 17:29                                           ` Zhang Yanfei
2013-08-23 16:54                                     ` Zhang Yanfei
2013-08-23 16:54                                       ` Zhang Yanfei
2013-08-23 18:18                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2013-08-23 18:18                                         ` Yinghai Lu
2013-08-23 18:25                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-23 20:08                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2013-08-23 20:30                                             ` Russ Anderson
2013-08-23 20:48                                               ` Yinghai Lu
2013-08-23 21:50                                                 ` chen tang
2013-08-23 21:52                                                   ` Moore, Robert
2013-08-23 22:05                                                     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-08-23 22:08                                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-08-23 22:40                                                     ` chen tang
2013-08-23 23:04                                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2013-08-24  2:41                                             ` Russ Anderson
2013-08-23 20:33                                         ` chen tang
2013-08-23 20:33                                           ` chen tang
2013-08-23 21:08                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2013-08-23 21:08                                             ` Yinghai Lu
2013-08-23 22:27                                             ` chen tang
2013-08-23 22:27                                               ` chen tang
2013-08-23 18:29                                       ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-23 18:29                                         ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-23 21:37                                         ` chen tang
2013-08-23 21:37                                           ` chen tang
2013-08-23 21:52                                           ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-23 21:52                                             ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-23 23:56                                             ` chen tang
2013-08-23 23:56                                               ` chen tang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1377209861.10300.756.camel@misato.fc.hp.com \
    --to=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
    --cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
    --cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mina86@mina86.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=trenn@suse.de \
    --cc=vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com \
    --cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhangyanfei.yes@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.