From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, walken@google.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, kirill@shutemov.name, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, npiggin@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH v5 07/13] lockdep: Make print_circular_bug() aware of crossrelease Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 22:17:33 +0900 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1484745459-2055-8-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1484745459-2055-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> print_circular_bug() reporting circular bug assumes that target hlock is owned by the current. However, in crossrelease, target hlock can be owned by other than the current. So the report format needs to be changed to reflect the change. Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> --- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index 0621b3e..49b9386 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -1129,22 +1129,41 @@ static inline int __bfs_backwards(struct lock_list *src_entry, printk(KERN_CONT "\n\n"); } - printk(" Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n"); - printk(" CPU0 CPU1\n"); - printk(" ---- ----\n"); - printk(" lock("); - __print_lock_name(target); - printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); - printk(" lock("); - __print_lock_name(parent); - printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); - printk(" lock("); - __print_lock_name(target); - printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); - printk(" lock("); - __print_lock_name(source); - printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); - printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n"); + if (cross_lock(tgt->instance)) { + printk(" Possible unsafe locking scenario by crosslock:\n\n"); + printk(" CPU0 CPU1\n"); + printk(" ---- ----\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(parent); + printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(target); + printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(source); + printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); + printk(" unlock("); + __print_lock_name(target); + printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); + printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n"); + } else { + printk(" Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n"); + printk(" CPU0 CPU1\n"); + printk(" ---- ----\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(target); + printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(parent); + printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(target); + printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(source); + printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); + printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n"); + } } /* @@ -1169,7 +1188,10 @@ static inline int __bfs_backwards(struct lock_list *src_entry, printk("%s/%d is trying to acquire lock:\n", curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr)); print_lock(check_src); - printk("\nbut task is already holding lock:\n"); + if (cross_lock(check_tgt->instance)) + printk("\nbut now in the release context of lock:\n"); + else + printk("\nbut task is already holding lock:\n"); print_lock(check_tgt); printk("\nwhich lock already depends on the new lock.\n\n"); printk("\nthe existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\n"); -- 1.9.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, walken@google.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, kirill@shutemov.name, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, npiggin@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH v5 07/13] lockdep: Make print_circular_bug() aware of crossrelease Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 22:17:33 +0900 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1484745459-2055-8-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1484745459-2055-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> print_circular_bug() reporting circular bug assumes that target hlock is owned by the current. However, in crossrelease, target hlock can be owned by other than the current. So the report format needs to be changed to reflect the change. Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> --- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index 0621b3e..49b9386 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -1129,22 +1129,41 @@ static inline int __bfs_backwards(struct lock_list *src_entry, printk(KERN_CONT "\n\n"); } - printk(" Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n"); - printk(" CPU0 CPU1\n"); - printk(" ---- ----\n"); - printk(" lock("); - __print_lock_name(target); - printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); - printk(" lock("); - __print_lock_name(parent); - printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); - printk(" lock("); - __print_lock_name(target); - printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); - printk(" lock("); - __print_lock_name(source); - printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); - printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n"); + if (cross_lock(tgt->instance)) { + printk(" Possible unsafe locking scenario by crosslock:\n\n"); + printk(" CPU0 CPU1\n"); + printk(" ---- ----\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(parent); + printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(target); + printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(source); + printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); + printk(" unlock("); + __print_lock_name(target); + printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); + printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n"); + } else { + printk(" Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n"); + printk(" CPU0 CPU1\n"); + printk(" ---- ----\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(target); + printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(parent); + printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(target); + printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(source); + printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); + printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n"); + } } /* @@ -1169,7 +1188,10 @@ static inline int __bfs_backwards(struct lock_list *src_entry, printk("%s/%d is trying to acquire lock:\n", curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr)); print_lock(check_src); - printk("\nbut task is already holding lock:\n"); + if (cross_lock(check_tgt->instance)) + printk("\nbut now in the release context of lock:\n"); + else + printk("\nbut task is already holding lock:\n"); print_lock(check_tgt); printk("\nwhich lock already depends on the new lock.\n\n"); printk("\nthe existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\n"); -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-18 13:17 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 124+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-01-18 13:17 [PATCH v5 00/13] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] lockdep: Refactor lookup_chain_cache() Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` Byungchul Park 2017-01-19 9:16 ` Boqun Feng 2017-01-19 9:52 ` Byungchul Park 2017-01-19 9:52 ` Byungchul Park 2017-01-26 7:53 ` Byungchul Park 2017-01-26 7:53 ` Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] lockdep: Fix wrong condition to print bug msgs for MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] lockdep: Add a function building a chain between two classes Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] lockdep: Refactor save_trace() Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 05/13] lockdep: Pass a callback arg to check_prev_add() to handle stack_trace Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` Byungchul Park 2017-01-26 7:43 ` Byungchul Park 2017-01-26 7:43 ` Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` Byungchul Park 2017-02-28 12:26 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-02-28 12:26 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-02-28 12:45 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-02-28 12:45 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-02-28 12:49 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-02-28 12:49 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-01 6:20 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-01 6:20 ` Byungchul Park 2017-02-28 13:05 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-02-28 13:05 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-02-28 13:28 ` Byungchul Park 2017-02-28 13:28 ` Byungchul Park 2017-02-28 13:35 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-02-28 13:35 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-02-28 14:00 ` Byungchul Park 2017-02-28 14:00 ` Byungchul Park 2017-02-28 13:10 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-02-28 13:10 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-02-28 13:24 ` Byungchul Park 2017-02-28 13:24 ` Byungchul Park 2017-02-28 18:29 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-02-28 18:29 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-01 4:40 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-01 4:40 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-01 10:45 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-01 10:45 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-01 12:10 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-01 12:10 ` Byungchul Park 2017-02-28 13:40 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-02-28 13:40 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-01 5:43 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-01 5:43 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-01 12:28 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-01 12:28 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-02 13:40 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-02 13:40 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-03 0:17 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-03 0:17 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-03 8:14 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-03 8:14 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-03 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-03 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-03 9:32 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-03 9:32 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-05 3:33 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-05 3:33 ` Byungchul Park 2017-08-10 12:18 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: Avoid creating redundant links tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-05 3:08 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Byungchul Park 2017-03-05 3:08 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-07 11:42 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-07 11:42 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-03 0:39 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-03 0:39 ` Byungchul Park 2017-02-28 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-02-28 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-01 5:17 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-01 5:17 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-01 6:18 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-01 6:18 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-02 2:52 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-02 2:52 ` Byungchul Park 2017-02-28 18:15 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-02-28 18:15 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-01 7:21 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-01 7:21 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-01 10:43 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-01 10:43 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-01 12:27 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-01 12:27 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-02 4:20 ` Matthew Wilcox 2017-03-02 4:20 ` Matthew Wilcox 2017-03-02 4:45 ` byungchul.park 2017-03-02 4:45 ` byungchul.park 2017-03-02 14:39 ` Matthew Wilcox 2017-03-02 14:39 ` Matthew Wilcox 2017-03-02 23:50 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-02 23:50 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-05 8:01 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-05 8:01 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-14 7:36 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-14 7:36 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-02 13:41 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-02 13:41 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-02 23:43 ` Byungchul Park 2017-03-02 23:43 ` Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` Byungchul Park [this message] 2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 07/13] lockdep: Make print_circular_bug() aware of crossrelease Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 08/13] lockdep: Apply crossrelease to completions Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 09/13] pagemap.h: Remove trailing white space Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 10/13] lockdep: Apply crossrelease to PG_locked locks Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] lockdep: Apply lock_acquire(release) on __Set(__Clear)PageLocked Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] lockdep: Move data of CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK from page to page_ext Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 13/13] lockdep: Crossrelease feature documentation Byungchul Park 2017-01-18 13:17 ` Byungchul Park 2017-01-20 9:08 ` [REVISED DOCUMENT] " Byungchul Park 2017-01-20 9:08 ` Byungchul Park 2017-02-20 8:38 ` [PATCH v5 00/13] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Byungchul Park 2017-02-20 8:38 ` Byungchul Park
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1484745459-2055-8-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com \ --to=byungchul.park@lge.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \ --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \ --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=mingo@kernel.org \ --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=walken@google.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.