All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	walken@google.com, kirill@shutemov.name,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	npiggin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/13] lockdep: Refactor lookup_chain_cache()
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 18:52:07 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170119095207.GP3326@X58A-UD3R> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170119091627.GG15084@tardis.cn.ibm.com>

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 05:16:27PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:17:27PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > Currently, lookup_chain_cache() provides both 'lookup' and 'add'
> > functionalities in a function. However, each is useful. So this
> > patch makes lookup_chain_cache() only do 'lookup' functionality and
> > makes add_chain_cahce() only do 'add' functionality. And it's more
> > readable than before.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >  1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> > index 4d7ffc0..f37156f 100644
> > --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> > +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> > @@ -2109,15 +2109,9 @@ static int check_no_collision(struct task_struct *curr,
> >  	return 1;
> >  }
> >  
> > -/*
> > - * Look up a dependency chain. If the key is not present yet then
> > - * add it and return 1 - in this case the new dependency chain is
> > - * validated. If the key is already hashed, return 0.
> > - * (On return with 1 graph_lock is held.)
> > - */
> 
> I think you'd better put some comments here for the behavior of
> add_chain_cache(), something like:
> 
> /*
>  * Add a dependency chain into chain hashtable.
>  * 
>  * Must be called with graph_lock held.
>  * Return 0 if fail to add the chain, and graph_lock is released.
>  * Return 1 with graph_lock held if succeed.
>  */

Yes. I will apply what you recommand.

Thank you very much. :)

Thanks,
Byungchul

> 
> Regards,
> Boqun
> 
> > -static inline int lookup_chain_cache(struct task_struct *curr,
> > -				     struct held_lock *hlock,
> > -				     u64 chain_key)
> > +static inline int add_chain_cache(struct task_struct *curr,
> > +				  struct held_lock *hlock,
> > +				  u64 chain_key)
> >  {
> >  	struct lock_class *class = hlock_class(hlock);
> >  	struct hlist_head *hash_head = chainhashentry(chain_key);
> > @@ -2125,49 +2119,18 @@ static inline int lookup_chain_cache(struct task_struct *curr,
> >  	int i, j;
> >  
> >  	/*
> > +	 * Allocate a new chain entry from the static array, and add
> > +	 * it to the hash:
> > +	 */
> > +
> > +	/*
> >  	 * We might need to take the graph lock, ensure we've got IRQs
> >  	 * disabled to make this an IRQ-safe lock.. for recursion reasons
> >  	 * lockdep won't complain about its own locking errors.
> >  	 */
> >  	if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled()))
> >  		return 0;
> [...]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	walken@google.com, kirill@shutemov.name,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	npiggin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/13] lockdep: Refactor lookup_chain_cache()
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 18:52:07 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170119095207.GP3326@X58A-UD3R> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170119091627.GG15084@tardis.cn.ibm.com>

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 05:16:27PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:17:27PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > Currently, lookup_chain_cache() provides both 'lookup' and 'add'
> > functionalities in a function. However, each is useful. So this
> > patch makes lookup_chain_cache() only do 'lookup' functionality and
> > makes add_chain_cahce() only do 'add' functionality. And it's more
> > readable than before.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >  1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> > index 4d7ffc0..f37156f 100644
> > --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> > +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> > @@ -2109,15 +2109,9 @@ static int check_no_collision(struct task_struct *curr,
> >  	return 1;
> >  }
> >  
> > -/*
> > - * Look up a dependency chain. If the key is not present yet then
> > - * add it and return 1 - in this case the new dependency chain is
> > - * validated. If the key is already hashed, return 0.
> > - * (On return with 1 graph_lock is held.)
> > - */
> 
> I think you'd better put some comments here for the behavior of
> add_chain_cache(), something like:
> 
> /*
>  * Add a dependency chain into chain hashtable.
>  * 
>  * Must be called with graph_lock held.
>  * Return 0 if fail to add the chain, and graph_lock is released.
>  * Return 1 with graph_lock held if succeed.
>  */

Yes. I will apply what you recommand.

Thank you very much. :)

Thanks,
Byungchul

> 
> Regards,
> Boqun
> 
> > -static inline int lookup_chain_cache(struct task_struct *curr,
> > -				     struct held_lock *hlock,
> > -				     u64 chain_key)
> > +static inline int add_chain_cache(struct task_struct *curr,
> > +				  struct held_lock *hlock,
> > +				  u64 chain_key)
> >  {
> >  	struct lock_class *class = hlock_class(hlock);
> >  	struct hlist_head *hash_head = chainhashentry(chain_key);
> > @@ -2125,49 +2119,18 @@ static inline int lookup_chain_cache(struct task_struct *curr,
> >  	int i, j;
> >  
> >  	/*
> > +	 * Allocate a new chain entry from the static array, and add
> > +	 * it to the hash:
> > +	 */
> > +
> > +	/*
> >  	 * We might need to take the graph lock, ensure we've got IRQs
> >  	 * disabled to make this an IRQ-safe lock.. for recursion reasons
> >  	 * lockdep won't complain about its own locking errors.
> >  	 */
> >  	if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled()))
> >  		return 0;
> [...]


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-19 10:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 124+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-18 13:17 [PATCH v5 00/13] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17 ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] lockdep: Refactor lookup_chain_cache() Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17   ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-19  9:16   ` Boqun Feng
2017-01-19  9:52     ` Byungchul Park [this message]
2017-01-19  9:52       ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-26  7:53     ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-26  7:53       ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] lockdep: Fix wrong condition to print bug msgs for MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17   ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] lockdep: Add a function building a chain between two classes Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17   ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] lockdep: Refactor save_trace() Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17   ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 05/13] lockdep: Pass a callback arg to check_prev_add() to handle stack_trace Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17   ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-26  7:43   ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-26  7:43     ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17   ` Byungchul Park
2017-02-28 12:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-28 12:26     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-28 12:45   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-28 12:45     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-28 12:49     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-28 12:49       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-01  6:20       ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-01  6:20         ` Byungchul Park
2017-02-28 13:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-28 13:05     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-28 13:28     ` Byungchul Park
2017-02-28 13:28       ` Byungchul Park
2017-02-28 13:35       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-28 13:35         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-28 14:00         ` Byungchul Park
2017-02-28 14:00           ` Byungchul Park
2017-02-28 13:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-28 13:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-28 13:24     ` Byungchul Park
2017-02-28 13:24       ` Byungchul Park
2017-02-28 18:29       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-28 18:29         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-01  4:40         ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-01  4:40           ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-01 10:45           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-01 10:45             ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-01 12:10             ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-01 12:10               ` Byungchul Park
2017-02-28 13:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-28 13:40     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-01  5:43     ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-01  5:43       ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-01 12:28       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-01 12:28         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-02 13:40         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-02 13:40           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-03  0:17           ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-03  0:17             ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-03  8:14             ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-03  8:14               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-03  9:13               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-03  9:13                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-03  9:32                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-03  9:32                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-05  3:33                 ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-05  3:33                   ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 12:18                 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: Avoid creating redundant links tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-05  3:08               ` [PATCH v5 06/13] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Byungchul Park
2017-03-05  3:08                 ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-07 11:42                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-07 11:42                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-03  0:39           ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-03  0:39             ` Byungchul Park
2017-02-28 15:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-28 15:49     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-01  5:17     ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-01  5:17       ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-01  6:18       ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-01  6:18         ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-02  2:52       ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-02  2:52         ` Byungchul Park
2017-02-28 18:15   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-28 18:15     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-01  7:21     ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-01  7:21       ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-01 10:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-01 10:43         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-01 12:27         ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-01 12:27           ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-02  4:20     ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-03-02  4:20       ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-03-02  4:45       ` byungchul.park
2017-03-02  4:45         ` byungchul.park
2017-03-02 14:39         ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-03-02 14:39           ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-03-02 23:50           ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-02 23:50             ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-05  8:01             ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-05  8:01               ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  7:36     ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  7:36       ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-02 13:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-02 13:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-02 23:43     ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-02 23:43       ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 07/13] lockdep: Make print_circular_bug() aware of crossrelease Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17   ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 08/13] lockdep: Apply crossrelease to completions Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17   ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 09/13] pagemap.h: Remove trailing white space Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17   ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 10/13] lockdep: Apply crossrelease to PG_locked locks Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17   ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] lockdep: Apply lock_acquire(release) on __Set(__Clear)PageLocked Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17   ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] lockdep: Move data of CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK from page to page_ext Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17   ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 13/13] lockdep: Crossrelease feature documentation Byungchul Park
2017-01-18 13:17   ` Byungchul Park
2017-01-20  9:08   ` [REVISED DOCUMENT] " Byungchul Park
2017-01-20  9:08     ` Byungchul Park
2017-02-20  8:38 ` [PATCH v5 00/13] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Byungchul Park
2017-02-20  8:38   ` Byungchul Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170119095207.GP3326@X58A-UD3R \
    --to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.