From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> To: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>, intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/tgl: Implement Wa_1604555607 Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:19:13 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <157433155300.28308.14950776314469170280@skylake-alporthouse-com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20191121101226.10779-2-ramalingam.c@intel.com> Quoting Ramalingam C (2019-11-21 10:12:26) > From: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> > > Implement Wa_1604555607 (set the DS pairing timer to 128 cycles). > FF_MODE2 is part of the register state context, that's why it is > implemented here. > > At TGL A0 stepping, FF_MODE2 register read back is broken, hence > disabling the WA verification. > > v2: Rebased on top of the WA refactoring (Oscar) > v3: Correctly add to ctx_workarounds_init (Michel) > v4: > uncore read is used [Tvrtko] > Macros as used for MASK definition [Chris] > v5: > Skip the Wa_1604555607 verification [Ram] > i915 ptr retrieved from engine. [Tvrtko] > > BSpec: 19363 > HSDES: 1604555607 > Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramlingam.c@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++--- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 4 ++++ > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c > index 399acae2f33f..7cfd2442b736 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c > @@ -147,19 +147,26 @@ static void _wa_add(struct i915_wa_list *wal, const struct i915_wa *wa) > } > > static void > -wa_write_masked_or(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 mask, > - u32 val) > +__wa_write_masked_or(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 mask, > + u32 val, u32 read_mask) > { > struct i915_wa wa = { > .reg = reg, > .mask = mask, > .val = val, > - .read = mask, > + .read = read_mask, > }; > > _wa_add(wal, &wa); You might as well call it wa_add() since it takes all the arguments to _wa_add() and wraps them up into struct that we then copy. > } > > +static void > +wa_write_masked_or(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 mask, > + u32 val) > +{ > + __wa_write_masked_or(wal, reg, mask, val, mask); > +} > + > static void > wa_masked_en(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 val) > { > @@ -568,9 +575,21 @@ static void icl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, > static void tgl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, > struct i915_wa_list *wal) > { > + u32 val; > + > /* Wa_1409142259:tgl */ > WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN11_COMMON_SLICE_CHICKEN3, > GEN12_DISABLE_CPS_AWARE_COLOR_PIPE); > + > + /* Wa_1604555607:tgl */ > + val = intel_uncore_read(engine->uncore, FF_MODE2); > + val &= ~FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK; > + val |= FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_128; > + if (IS_TGL_REVID(engine->i915, 0, TGL_REVID_A0)) > + __wa_write_masked_or(wal, FF_MODE2, > + FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK, val, 0); > + else > + wa_write_masked_or(wal, FF_MODE2, FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK, val); I still have this plan to do this as MI_MATH ops... But it's not a blocker. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> To: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>, intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/tgl: Implement Wa_1604555607 Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:19:13 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <157433155300.28308.14950776314469170280@skylake-alporthouse-com> (raw) Message-ID: <20191121101913.WfiauqyvXKAQMBxFT8MrhSg_ikCmyatpJINGG6a9I-s@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20191121101226.10779-2-ramalingam.c@intel.com> Quoting Ramalingam C (2019-11-21 10:12:26) > From: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> > > Implement Wa_1604555607 (set the DS pairing timer to 128 cycles). > FF_MODE2 is part of the register state context, that's why it is > implemented here. > > At TGL A0 stepping, FF_MODE2 register read back is broken, hence > disabling the WA verification. > > v2: Rebased on top of the WA refactoring (Oscar) > v3: Correctly add to ctx_workarounds_init (Michel) > v4: > uncore read is used [Tvrtko] > Macros as used for MASK definition [Chris] > v5: > Skip the Wa_1604555607 verification [Ram] > i915 ptr retrieved from engine. [Tvrtko] > > BSpec: 19363 > HSDES: 1604555607 > Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramlingam.c@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++--- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 4 ++++ > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c > index 399acae2f33f..7cfd2442b736 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c > @@ -147,19 +147,26 @@ static void _wa_add(struct i915_wa_list *wal, const struct i915_wa *wa) > } > > static void > -wa_write_masked_or(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 mask, > - u32 val) > +__wa_write_masked_or(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 mask, > + u32 val, u32 read_mask) > { > struct i915_wa wa = { > .reg = reg, > .mask = mask, > .val = val, > - .read = mask, > + .read = read_mask, > }; > > _wa_add(wal, &wa); You might as well call it wa_add() since it takes all the arguments to _wa_add() and wraps them up into struct that we then copy. > } > > +static void > +wa_write_masked_or(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 mask, > + u32 val) > +{ > + __wa_write_masked_or(wal, reg, mask, val, mask); > +} > + > static void > wa_masked_en(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 val) > { > @@ -568,9 +575,21 @@ static void icl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, > static void tgl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, > struct i915_wa_list *wal) > { > + u32 val; > + > /* Wa_1409142259:tgl */ > WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN11_COMMON_SLICE_CHICKEN3, > GEN12_DISABLE_CPS_AWARE_COLOR_PIPE); > + > + /* Wa_1604555607:tgl */ > + val = intel_uncore_read(engine->uncore, FF_MODE2); > + val &= ~FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK; > + val |= FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_128; > + if (IS_TGL_REVID(engine->i915, 0, TGL_REVID_A0)) > + __wa_write_masked_or(wal, FF_MODE2, > + FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK, val, 0); > + else > + wa_write_masked_or(wal, FF_MODE2, FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK, val); I still have this plan to do this as MI_MATH ops... But it's not a blocker. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-21 10:19 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-11-21 10:12 [PATCH 0/1] Wa_1604555607 implementation and verification skip Ramalingam C 2019-11-21 10:12 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C 2019-11-21 10:12 ` [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/tgl: Implement Wa_1604555607 Ramalingam C 2019-11-21 10:12 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C 2019-11-21 10:19 ` Chris Wilson [this message] 2019-11-21 10:19 ` Chris Wilson 2019-11-21 10:51 ` Ramalingam C 2019-11-21 10:51 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C 2019-11-21 10:19 ` Tvrtko Ursulin 2019-11-21 10:19 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin 2019-11-21 11:12 ` Ramalingam C 2019-11-21 11:12 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C 2019-11-21 18:29 ` Lucas De Marchi 2019-11-21 18:29 ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi 2019-11-22 3:27 ` Ramalingam C 2019-11-22 3:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C 2019-11-21 14:32 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Wa_1604555607 implementation and verification skip (rev5) Patchwork 2019-11-21 14:32 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork 2019-11-21 15:03 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2019-11-21 15:03 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork 2019-11-22 4:02 [PATCH 0/1] Wa_1604555607 implementation and verification skip Ramalingam C 2019-11-22 4:02 ` [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/tgl: Implement Wa_1604555607 Ramalingam C 2019-11-22 9:21 ` Tvrtko Ursulin 2019-11-22 9:29 ` Chris Wilson 2019-11-26 8:00 ` Ramalingam C 2019-11-26 9:38 ` Lucas De Marchi 2019-11-26 10:10 ` Ramalingam C
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=157433155300.28308.14950776314469170280@skylake-alporthouse-com \ --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=michel.thierry@intel.com \ --cc=ramalingam.c@intel.com \ --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.