From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <email@example.com> To: Michael Buesch <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: Larry Finger <email@example.com>, wireless <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, John Linville <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix loss of association after resume Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:25:43 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <email@example.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> On Tuesday, 13 February 2007 00:24, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Tuesday 13 February 2007 00:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, 12 February 2007 23:20, Larry Finger wrote: > > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Monday, 12 February 2007 02:18, Larry Finger wrote: > > > >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > >>> It doesn't help in my case. The behavior is similar to that without the patch, > > > >>> but also with the patch it loses the association entirely. > > > >> Thanks for trying. > > > >> > > > >> Do you have this patch installed? If you do, please try increasing the 100 to 200. > > > > > > > > Hm, but it wouldn't help to get the microcode to respond after the resume ... > > > > > > Yes it would. That count is how long the system waits for the firmware to respond. > > > > > > > I'm still thinking the problem is with the firmware. Where exactly is it > > > > stored? > > > > > > In the memory of the microprocessor on the card. > > > > > > Please do what I asked. > > > > With or without the previous patch? > > Both, please. It doesn't help in either case. I get albercik:~ # ifconfig eth1 down albercik:~ # ifconfig eth1 up SIOCSIFFLAGS: No such device in both cases. I think the problem is that the firmware is not present and requesting it doesn't work for some reason. Greetings, Rafael
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-13 16:29 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2007-02-09 16:18 Larry Finger 2007-02-09 16:18 ` Larry Finger 2007-02-09 16:53 ` Michael Buesch 2007-02-09 16:53 ` Michael Buesch 2007-02-10 17:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2007-02-10 17:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2007-02-10 20:33 ` Larry Finger 2007-02-11 12:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2007-02-11 13:07 ` Michael Buesch 2007-02-11 14:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2007-02-11 14:14 ` Michael Buesch 2007-02-11 14:41 ` Johannes Berg 2007-02-11 14:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2007-02-11 14:48 ` Johannes Berg 2007-02-11 15:59 ` Larry Finger 2007-02-11 16:03 ` Michael Buesch 2007-02-11 16:16 ` Michael Buesch 2007-02-11 16:17 ` Larry Finger 2007-02-12 0:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2007-02-12 1:18 ` Larry Finger 2007-02-12 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2007-02-12 22:20 ` Larry Finger 2007-02-12 23:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2007-02-12 23:18 ` Larry Finger 2007-02-12 23:24 ` Michael Buesch 2007-02-13 16:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix loss of association after resume' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.