Re: [PATCH 4/4] kvm: i386: Add classic PCI device assignment

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 07:27:32PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 09/03/2012 10:32 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>> On 08/29/2012 11:27 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't see a point in making contributors avoid non-problems that might
> >>>> conceivably become trivial problems some day.  Especially when there's
> >>>> no automated help with the avoiding.
> >>>
> >>> -Wpointer-arith
> >>
> >> +1
> >
> > FWIW, I'm not in favour of enabling it, just pointing out that it
> > exists.  In general I prefer avoiding unnecessary use of extensions, but
> > in this case the extension is trivial and improves readability.
> 
> Void pointers are not so type safe as uint8_t pointers.

casts are even worse.

> There's also
> little difference in readability between those in my opinion.

here too, casts are worse for readability.

> >
> >
> > --
> > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function