Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] kvm: i386: Add classic PCI device assignment

[Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>]

On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 08.09.2012, at 10:06, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On 09/05/2012 10:04 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Reinventing a disassembler for ever growing x86 assembly is
>>>> no fun.
>>>
>>> We can try linking to a disassembler library.  I use udis86 to
>>> disassemble instructions in kvm tracepoints
>>> (http://udis86.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=udis86/udis86;a=shortlog),
>>> it's maintained but not heavily so.
>>
>> I think commonality with KVM would be preferred. The library looks
>> neat and based on changelog, more actively developed than BSD DDB.
>>
>>>
>>> Of course for non-x86 we'd need to continue using binutils; this is
>>> about copying code vs. libraries, not about licensing.
>>
>> For most architectures, pre-GPLv3 binutils is good enough since the
>> instruction set does not change anymore. Maybe only PPC and Sparc64
>> still change besides x86. New CPUs types more recent than 2007 will
>> have problems.
>
> Alternatively we could try to run the disassembler in a different process, right?

For qemu.log this would be doable and even improve performance since
only binary data would be transferred.

But for monitor disassembly command x/i it may be too clumsy. There's
some overlap with GDB support, so maybe we could deprecate monitor
disassembly.

>
> Alex
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
>>