From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: mach-shmobile: r8a7779: Allow initialisation of GIC by DT Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:37:01 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20130204173701.GE28464@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <510BCE09.7050302@gmail.com> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 02:15:37PM +0000, Rob Herring wrote: > On 02/01/2013 04:58 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 12:34:10AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 09:11:19AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:32:13PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > >>>> Hi Simon, > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 01:50:49AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote: > > >>>>> + > >>>>> + gic: interrupt-controller@f0001000 { > >>>>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic"; > >>>>> + #interrupt-cells = <3>; > >>>>> + #address-cells = <1>; > >>>> > >>>> Why is #address-cells needed here (and without #size-cells)? I see it's in the > >>>> binding document example, but I can't figure out why. > >>> > >>> Its here because I copied the example. > >>> I will see about removing it from here. > > > > Rob, Grant, do either of you know if there's a reason for this that we've > > missed? > > > > The gic doesn't have any direct children, and this doesn't seem to be > > some decvicetree interrupt-controller magic. > > If you look at of_irq_map_raw, there are cases that look at > #address-cells. Those appear to be only when you have an interrupt-map > though. Aah. So this is some devicetree magic after all. Thanks for looking into it. > > > > If this is superfluous, how about the patch below? > > The docs probably should state #addr-cells is only required with > interrupt-map. That'd be nice. It might limit the confusion we had here. > > > > > I took a quick look at arch/arm/boot/dts/. Some gic nodes don't have > > #address-cells, some have it but not #size-cells, and some have both. These > > should probably be cleaned up too. > > Some boards are using interrupt-map, so they may need #address-cells. So > I'm inclined to leave things alone. That would make sense. Thanks, Mark.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: mach-shmobile: r8a7779: Allow initialisation of GIC by DT Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 17:37:01 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20130204173701.GE28464@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <510BCE09.7050302@gmail.com> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 02:15:37PM +0000, Rob Herring wrote: > On 02/01/2013 04:58 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 12:34:10AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 09:11:19AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:32:13PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > >>>> Hi Simon, > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 01:50:49AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote: > > >>>>> + > >>>>> + gic: interrupt-controller at f0001000 { > >>>>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic"; > >>>>> + #interrupt-cells = <3>; > >>>>> + #address-cells = <1>; > >>>> > >>>> Why is #address-cells needed here (and without #size-cells)? I see it's in the > >>>> binding document example, but I can't figure out why. > >>> > >>> Its here because I copied the example. > >>> I will see about removing it from here. > > > > Rob, Grant, do either of you know if there's a reason for this that we've > > missed? > > > > The gic doesn't have any direct children, and this doesn't seem to be > > some decvicetree interrupt-controller magic. > > If you look at of_irq_map_raw, there are cases that look at > #address-cells. Those appear to be only when you have an interrupt-map > though. Aah. So this is some devicetree magic after all. Thanks for looking into it. > > > > If this is superfluous, how about the patch below? > > The docs probably should state #addr-cells is only required with > interrupt-map. That'd be nice. It might limit the confusion we had here. > > > > > I took a quick look at arch/arm/boot/dts/. Some gic nodes don't have > > #address-cells, some have it but not #size-cells, and some have both. These > > should probably be cleaned up too. > > Some boards are using interrupt-map, so they may need #address-cells. So > I'm inclined to leave things alone. That would make sense. Thanks, Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-04 17:37 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2013-01-31 1:50 ARM: mach-shmobile: r8a7779, marzen: Reference DT implementation Simon Horman 2013-01-31 1:50 ` Simon Horman 2013-01-31 1:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: mach-shmobile: marzen: defconfig: use regulators by default Simon Horman 2013-01-31 1:50 ` Simon Horman 2013-01-31 1:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: mach-shmobile: r8a7779: Allow initialisation of GIC by DT Simon Horman 2013-01-31 1:50 ` Simon Horman 2013-01-31 12:32 ` Mark Rutland 2013-01-31 12:32 ` Mark Rutland 2013-02-01 0:11 ` Simon Horman 2013-02-01 0:11 ` Simon Horman 2013-02-01 0:34 ` Simon Horman 2013-02-01 0:34 ` Simon Horman 2013-02-01 1:47 ` Simon Horman 2013-02-01 1:47 ` Simon Horman 2013-02-01 4:39 ` Simon Horman 2013-02-01 4:39 ` Simon Horman 2013-02-01 11:31 ` Mark Rutland 2013-02-01 11:31 ` Mark Rutland 2013-02-01 10:58 ` Mark Rutland 2013-02-01 10:58 ` Mark Rutland 2013-02-01 14:15 ` Rob Herring 2013-02-01 14:15 ` Rob Herring 2013-02-04 17:37 ` Mark Rutland [this message] 2013-02-04 17:37 ` Mark Rutland 2013-02-16 21:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: mach-shmobile: r8a7779: add SATA support Sergei Shtylyov 2013-02-16 22:43 ` Sergei Shtylyov 2013-02-18 1:23 ` Kuninori Morimoto 2013-02-18 1:23 ` Kuninori Morimoto 2013-02-18 14:07 ` Sergei Shtylyov 2013-02-18 14:07 ` Sergei Shtylyov 2013-02-18 14:21 ` Magnus Damm 2013-02-18 14:21 ` Magnus Damm 2013-02-19 0:40 ` Kuninori Morimoto 2013-02-19 0:40 ` Kuninori Morimoto 2013-02-19 1:26 ` Simon Horman 2013-02-19 1:26 ` Simon Horman 2013-02-19 14:26 ` Sergei Shtylyov 2013-02-19 14:26 ` Sergei Shtylyov 2013-02-19 1:25 ` Simon Horman 2013-02-19 1:25 ` Simon Horman 2013-01-31 1:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: mach-shmobile: r8a7779: Minimal setup using DT Simon Horman 2013-01-31 1:50 ` Simon Horman 2013-02-18 9:36 ` Magnus Damm 2013-02-18 9:36 ` Magnus Damm 2013-02-18 11:37 ` Simon Horman 2013-02-18 11:37 ` Simon Horman 2013-02-18 12:14 ` Magnus Damm 2013-02-18 12:14 ` Magnus Damm 2013-02-18 12:37 ` Simon Horman 2013-02-18 12:37 ` Simon Horman 2013-02-18 12:22 ` Magnus Damm 2013-02-18 12:22 ` Magnus Damm 2013-02-18 12:37 ` Simon Horman 2013-02-18 12:37 ` Simon Horman 2013-02-18 19:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: mach-shmobile: r8a7779: add SATA support Sergei Shtylyov 2013-02-18 20:31 ` Sergei Shtylyov 2013-01-31 1:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: mach-shmobile: marzen: Reference DT implementation Simon Horman 2013-01-31 1:50 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20130204173701.GE28464@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com \ --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.