From: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org> To: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, hpa@zytor.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 11/11] Add option to automatically enforce module signatures when in Secure Boot mode Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 11:16:49 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20130905101649.GL28598@console-pimps.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1378252218-18798-12-git-send-email-matthew.garrett@nebula.com> On Tue, 03 Sep, at 07:50:18PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > UEFI Secure Boot provides a mechanism for ensuring that the firmware will > only load signed bootloaders and kernels. Certain use cases may also > require that all kernel modules also be signed. Add a configuration option > that enforces this automatically when enabled. > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com> > --- > Documentation/x86/zero-page.txt | 2 ++ > arch/x86/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++ > arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h | 3 ++- > arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 6 ++++++ > include/linux/module.h | 6 ++++++ > kernel/module.c | 7 +++++++ > 7 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) [...] > @@ -1129,6 +1129,12 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p) > > io_delay_init(); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT_SIG_ENFORCE > + if (boot_params.secure_boot) { > + enforce_signed_modules(); > + } > +#endif > + I'd advise checking efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT) along with .secure_boot to guard against garbage values in boot_params. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matt Fleming <matt-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org> To: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett-05XSO3Yj/JvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org, hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 11/11] Add option to automatically enforce module signatures when in Secure Boot mode Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 11:16:49 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20130905101649.GL28598@console-pimps.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1378252218-18798-12-git-send-email-matthew.garrett-05XSO3Yj/JvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> On Tue, 03 Sep, at 07:50:18PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > UEFI Secure Boot provides a mechanism for ensuring that the firmware will > only load signed bootloaders and kernels. Certain use cases may also > require that all kernel modules also be signed. Add a configuration option > that enforces this automatically when enabled. > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett-05XSO3Yj/JvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > --- > Documentation/x86/zero-page.txt | 2 ++ > arch/x86/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++ > arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h | 3 ++- > arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 6 ++++++ > include/linux/module.h | 6 ++++++ > kernel/module.c | 7 +++++++ > 7 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) [...] > @@ -1129,6 +1129,12 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p) > > io_delay_init(); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT_SIG_ENFORCE > + if (boot_params.secure_boot) { > + enforce_signed_modules(); > + } > +#endif > + I'd advise checking efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT) along with .secure_boot to guard against garbage values in boot_params. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-05 10:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2013-09-03 23:50 Matthew Garrett 2013-09-03 23:50 ` (unknown), Matthew Garrett 2013-09-03 23:50 ` [PATCH V3 01/11] Add secure_modules() call Matthew Garrett 2013-09-04 0:45 ` James Morris 2013-09-04 0:45 ` James Morris 2013-09-05 2:14 ` joeyli 2013-09-05 2:14 ` joeyli 2013-09-03 23:50 ` [PATCH V3 02/11] PCI: Lock down BAR access when module security is enabled Matthew Garrett 2013-09-04 0:45 ` James Morris 2013-09-04 0:45 ` James Morris 2013-09-04 16:57 ` David Woodhouse 2013-09-04 16:57 ` David Woodhouse 2013-09-04 17:04 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-04 17:04 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-04 18:58 ` David Woodhouse 2013-09-04 19:01 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-04 19:01 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-04 19:31 ` David Woodhouse 2013-09-04 19:31 ` David Woodhouse 2013-09-03 23:50 ` [PATCH V3 03/11] x86: Lock down IO port " Matthew Garrett 2013-09-04 0:45 ` James Morris 2013-09-05 3:52 ` H. Peter Anvin 2013-09-05 3:52 ` H. Peter Anvin 2013-09-05 3:58 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-05 3:58 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-05 15:36 ` H. Peter Anvin 2013-09-05 15:36 ` H. Peter Anvin 2013-09-03 23:50 ` [PATCH V3 04/11] ACPI: Limit access to custom_method Matthew Garrett 2013-09-04 0:46 ` James Morris 2013-09-04 0:46 ` James Morris 2013-09-03 23:50 ` [PATCH V3 05/11] asus-wmi: Restrict debugfs interface when module loading is restricted Matthew Garrett 2013-09-04 0:46 ` James Morris 2013-09-04 0:46 ` James Morris 2013-09-03 23:50 ` [PATCH V3 06/11] Restrict /dev/mem and /dev/kmem " Matthew Garrett 2013-09-04 0:47 ` James Morris 2013-09-04 0:47 ` James Morris 2013-09-03 23:50 ` [PATCH V3 07/11] acpi: Ignore acpi_rsdp kernel parameter " Matthew Garrett 2013-09-03 23:50 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-03 23:50 ` [PATCH V3 08/11] kexec: Disable at runtime if the kernel enforces module loading restrictions Matthew Garrett 2013-09-04 0:48 ` James Morris 2013-09-04 0:48 ` James Morris 2013-09-04 20:09 ` jerry.hoemann 2013-09-04 20:09 ` jerry.hoemann-VXdhtT5mjnY 2013-09-04 20:12 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-04 20:12 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-04 20:12 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-04 20:14 ` Josh Boyer 2013-09-04 20:14 ` Josh Boyer 2013-09-04 20:14 ` Josh Boyer 2013-09-08 6:40 ` Greg KH 2013-09-08 6:40 ` Greg KH 2013-09-08 6:44 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-08 6:44 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-08 7:24 ` Greg KH 2013-09-08 7:24 ` Greg KH 2013-09-08 14:40 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-08 14:40 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-08 15:51 ` Kees Cook 2013-09-08 15:51 ` Kees Cook 2013-09-08 16:18 ` Greg KH 2013-09-08 16:18 ` Greg KH 2013-09-08 16:24 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-08 16:24 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-08 16:39 ` Greg KH 2013-09-08 16:39 ` Greg KH 2013-09-08 16:59 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-08 16:59 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-08 17:22 ` Greg KH 2013-09-08 17:22 ` Greg KH 2013-09-08 17:25 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-08 17:25 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-08 17:11 ` James Bottomley 2013-09-08 17:11 ` James Bottomley 2013-09-08 17:15 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-08 17:15 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-08 17:22 ` James Bottomley 2013-09-08 17:22 ` James Bottomley 2013-09-08 17:27 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-08 17:27 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-08 17:32 ` James Bottomley 2013-09-08 17:32 ` James Bottomley 2013-09-08 17:38 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-08 17:38 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-03 23:50 ` [PATCH V3 09/11] uswsusp: Disable when module loading is restricted Matthew Garrett 2013-09-04 0:48 ` James Morris 2013-09-04 0:48 ` James Morris 2013-09-05 3:20 ` joeyli 2013-09-05 3:20 ` joeyli 2013-09-03 23:50 ` [PATCH V3 10/11] x86: Restrict MSR access " Matthew Garrett 2013-09-04 0:49 ` James Morris 2013-09-04 0:49 ` James Morris 2013-09-03 23:50 ` [PATCH V3 11/11] Add option to automatically enforce module signatures when in Secure Boot mode Matthew Garrett 2013-09-03 23:50 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-04 1:42 ` James Morris 2013-09-04 1:42 ` James Morris 2013-09-04 1:42 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-04 1:42 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-05 3:13 ` joeyli 2013-09-05 8:24 ` joeyli 2013-09-05 8:24 ` joeyli 2013-09-05 10:16 ` Matt Fleming [this message] 2013-09-05 10:16 ` Matt Fleming 2013-09-05 12:54 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-05 12:54 ` Matthew Garrett 2013-09-04 15:53 ` Kees Cook 2013-09-04 15:53 ` Re: Kees Cook 2013-09-04 16:05 ` Re: Josh Boyer 2013-09-04 16:05 ` Re: Josh Boyer
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20130905101649.GL28598@console-pimps.org \ --to=matt@console-pimps.org \ --cc=hpa@zytor.com \ --cc=keescook@chromium.org \ --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.