Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] devicetree: bindings: Document Renesas JPEG Processing Unit.

[Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>]

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:03:34AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:59:46PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> Hi Mikhail,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Mikhail Ulyanov
> >> <mikhail.ulyanov@cogentembedded.com> wrote:
> >> > +  - compatible: should containg one of the following:
> >> > +                       - "renesas,jpu-r8a7790" for R-Car H2
> >> > +                       - "renesas,jpu-r8a7791" for R-Car M2
> >> > +                       - "renesas,jpu-gen2" for R-Car second generation
> >>
> >> Isn't "renesas,jpu-gen2" meant as a fallback?
> >>
> >> I.e. the DTS should have one of '7790 and '7791, AND the gen2 fallback,
> >> so we can make the driver match against '7790 and '7791 is we find
> >> out about an incompatibility.
> >
> > Is there a document that clearly states that there is such a thing
> > as jpu-gen2 in hardware? If not I would prefer not to add a binding for it.
> 
> We do have a document that describes the "JPEG Processing Unit (JPU)",
> as found in the following members of the "Second Generation R-Car Series
> Products": "R-Car H2", "R-Car M2-W", "R-Car M2-N", and "R-Car V2H".

Oh, that is nice :)

From my point of view that ticks a lot of boxes.
But I wonder if we can come up with a better name than jpu,-gen2.

> As for other SoCs, M1, H1, and A1 also seem to contain a JPU, but just
> like Mikhail, I don't have enough information to say anything about those.
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds
>