* [PATCH] edac, i5000, i5400: fix definition of nrecmemb register
@ 2017-06-12 17:47 ` Jérémy Lefaure
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jérémy Lefaure @ 2017-06-12 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Borislav Petkov, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Cc: Jérémy Lefaure, linux-edac, linux-kernel
In i5000 and i5400 edac drivers, the register nrecmemb is defined as a
16 bits value which result in wrong shifts in the code:
CHECK drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c:485:15: warning: right shift by bigger than
source value
drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c:580:23: warning: right shift by bigger than
source value
CC drivers/edac/i5000_edac.o
CHECK drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c:391:36: warning: right shift by bigger than
source value
drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c:401:37: warning: right shift by bigger than
source value
CC drivers/edac/i5400_edac.o
In the datasheets ([1], section 3.9.22.20 and [2], section 3.9.22.21),
this register is a 32 bits register. A u32 value for the register fixes
the wrong shifts warnings and matches the datasheet.
This patch also fixes the mask to access to the CAS bits [16 to 28] in
the i5000 edac driver.
[1]: https://www.intel.com/content/dam/doc/datasheet/5000p-5000v-5000z-chipset-memory-controller-hub-datasheet.pdf
[2]: https://www.intel.se/content/dam/doc/datasheet/5400-chipset-memory-controller-hub-datasheet.pdf
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Lefaure <jeremy.lefaure@lse.epita.fr>
---
I have found this error thanks to the sparse tool. Please note that this patch
hasn't been tested on real hardware.
drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c | 6 +++---
drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c b/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
index f683919981b0..c79016ade51e 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@
#define NREC_RDWR(x) (((x)>>11) & 1)
#define NREC_RANK(x) (((x)>>8) & 0x7)
#define NRECMEMB 0xC0
-#define NREC_CAS(x) (((x)>>16) & 0xFFFFFF)
+#define NREC_CAS(x) (((x)>>16) & 0x1FFF)
#define NREC_RAS(x) ((x) & 0x7FFF)
#define NRECFGLOG 0xC4
#define NREEECFBDA 0xC8
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ struct i5000_error_info {
/* These registers are input ONLY if there was a
* Non-Recoverable Error */
u16 nrecmema; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log A */
- u16 nrecmemb; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log B */
+ u32 nrecmemb; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log B */
};
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static void i5000_get_error_info(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
NERR_FAT_FBD, &info->nerr_fat_fbd);
pci_read_config_word(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
NRECMEMA, &info->nrecmema);
- pci_read_config_word(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
+ pci_read_config_dword(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
NRECMEMB, &info->nrecmemb);
/* Clear the error bits, by writing them back */
diff --git a/drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c b/drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
index 37a9ba71da44..cd889edc8516 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ struct i5400_error_info {
/* These registers are input ONLY if there was a Non-Rec Error */
u16 nrecmema; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log A */
- u16 nrecmemb; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log B */
+ u32 nrecmemb; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log B */
};
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static void i5400_get_error_info(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
NERR_FAT_FBD, &info->nerr_fat_fbd);
pci_read_config_word(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
NRECMEMA, &info->nrecmema);
- pci_read_config_word(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
+ pci_read_config_dword(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
NRECMEMB, &info->nrecmemb);
/* Clear the error bits, by writing them back */
--
2.13.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* edac, i5000, i5400: fix definition of nrecmemb register
@ 2017-06-12 17:47 ` Jérémy Lefaure
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jérémy Lefaure @ 2017-06-12 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Borislav Petkov, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Cc: Jérémy Lefaure, linux-edac, linux-kernel
In i5000 and i5400 edac drivers, the register nrecmemb is defined as a
16 bits value which result in wrong shifts in the code:
CHECK drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c:485:15: warning: right shift by bigger than
source value
drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c:580:23: warning: right shift by bigger than
source value
CC drivers/edac/i5000_edac.o
CHECK drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c:391:36: warning: right shift by bigger than
source value
drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c:401:37: warning: right shift by bigger than
source value
CC drivers/edac/i5400_edac.o
In the datasheets ([1], section 3.9.22.20 and [2], section 3.9.22.21),
this register is a 32 bits register. A u32 value for the register fixes
the wrong shifts warnings and matches the datasheet.
This patch also fixes the mask to access to the CAS bits [16 to 28] in
the i5000 edac driver.
[1]: https://www.intel.com/content/dam/doc/datasheet/5000p-5000v-5000z-chipset-memory-controller-hub-datasheet.pdf
[2]: https://www.intel.se/content/dam/doc/datasheet/5400-chipset-memory-controller-hub-datasheet.pdf
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Lefaure <jeremy.lefaure@lse.epita.fr>
---
I have found this error thanks to the sparse tool. Please note that this patch
hasn't been tested on real hardware.
drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c | 6 +++---
drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c b/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
index f683919981b0..c79016ade51e 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@
#define NREC_RDWR(x) (((x)>>11) & 1)
#define NREC_RANK(x) (((x)>>8) & 0x7)
#define NRECMEMB 0xC0
-#define NREC_CAS(x) (((x)>>16) & 0xFFFFFF)
+#define NREC_CAS(x) (((x)>>16) & 0x1FFF)
#define NREC_RAS(x) ((x) & 0x7FFF)
#define NRECFGLOG 0xC4
#define NREEECFBDA 0xC8
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ struct i5000_error_info {
/* These registers are input ONLY if there was a
* Non-Recoverable Error */
u16 nrecmema; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log A */
- u16 nrecmemb; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log B */
+ u32 nrecmemb; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log B */
};
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static void i5000_get_error_info(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
NERR_FAT_FBD, &info->nerr_fat_fbd);
pci_read_config_word(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
NRECMEMA, &info->nrecmema);
- pci_read_config_word(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
+ pci_read_config_dword(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
NRECMEMB, &info->nrecmemb);
/* Clear the error bits, by writing them back */
diff --git a/drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c b/drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
index 37a9ba71da44..cd889edc8516 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ struct i5400_error_info {
/* These registers are input ONLY if there was a Non-Rec Error */
u16 nrecmema; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log A */
- u16 nrecmemb; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log B */
+ u32 nrecmemb; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log B */
};
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static void i5400_get_error_info(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
NERR_FAT_FBD, &info->nerr_fat_fbd);
pci_read_config_word(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
NRECMEMA, &info->nrecmema);
- pci_read_config_word(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
+ pci_read_config_dword(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
NRECMEMB, &info->nrecmemb);
/* Clear the error bits, by writing them back */
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] edac, i5000, i5400: fix definition of nrecmemb register
@ 2017-06-28 16:08 ` Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2017-06-28 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jérémy Lefaure; +Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab, linux-edac, linux-kernel
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:47:58PM -0400, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:
> In i5000 and i5400 edac drivers, the register nrecmemb is defined as a
> 16 bits value which result in wrong shifts in the code:
> CHECK drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
> drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c:485:15: warning: right shift by bigger than
> source value
> drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c:580:23: warning: right shift by bigger than
> source value
> CC drivers/edac/i5000_edac.o
> CHECK drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
> drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c:391:36: warning: right shift by bigger than
> source value
> drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c:401:37: warning: right shift by bigger than
> source value
> CC drivers/edac/i5400_edac.o
>
> In the datasheets ([1], section 3.9.22.20 and [2], section 3.9.22.21),
> this register is a 32 bits register. A u32 value for the register fixes
> the wrong shifts warnings and matches the datasheet.
>
> This patch also fixes the mask to access to the CAS bits [16 to 28] in
> the i5000 edac driver.
>
> [1]: https://www.intel.com/content/dam/doc/datasheet/5000p-5000v-5000z-chipset-memory-controller-hub-datasheet.pdf
Well, the CAS field length here is [27:16], see below.
> [2]: https://www.intel.se/content/dam/doc/datasheet/5400-chipset-memory-controller-hub-datasheet.pdf
Here it is [28:16].
> Signed-off-by: Jérémy Lefaure <jeremy.lefaure@lse.epita.fr>
> ---
>
> I have found this error thanks to the sparse tool. Please note that this patch
> hasn't been tested on real hardware.
>
>
> drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c b/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
> index f683919981b0..c79016ade51e 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@
> #define NREC_RDWR(x) (((x)>>11) & 1)
> #define NREC_RANK(x) (((x)>>8) & 0x7)
> #define NRECMEMB 0xC0
> -#define NREC_CAS(x) (((x)>>16) & 0xFFFFFF)
> +#define NREC_CAS(x) (((x)>>16) & 0x1FFF)
That is still incorrect. According to the 5000? datasheet above,
NRECMEMB has the CAS field in bits [27:16]. That's 12 bits, so the mask
should be 0xFFF. IOW,
#define NREC_CAS(x) (((x)>>16) & 0xFFF)
The 0x1FFF mask is correct for the 5400 driver because the CAS field
there is [28:16].
The fact that no one caught this by now goes to show how many people are
actually using this thing. :-\
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* edac, i5000, i5400: fix definition of nrecmemb register
@ 2017-06-28 16:08 ` Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2017-06-28 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jérémy Lefaure; +Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab, linux-edac, linux-kernel
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:47:58PM -0400, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:
> In i5000 and i5400 edac drivers, the register nrecmemb is defined as a
> 16 bits value which result in wrong shifts in the code:
> CHECK drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
> drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c:485:15: warning: right shift by bigger than
> source value
> drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c:580:23: warning: right shift by bigger than
> source value
> CC drivers/edac/i5000_edac.o
> CHECK drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
> drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c:391:36: warning: right shift by bigger than
> source value
> drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c:401:37: warning: right shift by bigger than
> source value
> CC drivers/edac/i5400_edac.o
>
> In the datasheets ([1], section 3.9.22.20 and [2], section 3.9.22.21),
> this register is a 32 bits register. A u32 value for the register fixes
> the wrong shifts warnings and matches the datasheet.
>
> This patch also fixes the mask to access to the CAS bits [16 to 28] in
> the i5000 edac driver.
>
> [1]: https://www.intel.com/content/dam/doc/datasheet/5000p-5000v-5000z-chipset-memory-controller-hub-datasheet.pdf
Well, the CAS field length here is [27:16], see below.
> [2]: https://www.intel.se/content/dam/doc/datasheet/5400-chipset-memory-controller-hub-datasheet.pdf
Here it is [28:16].
> Signed-off-by: Jérémy Lefaure <jeremy.lefaure@lse.epita.fr>
> ---
>
> I have found this error thanks to the sparse tool. Please note that this patch
> hasn't been tested on real hardware.
>
>
> drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c b/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
> index f683919981b0..c79016ade51e 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@
> #define NREC_RDWR(x) (((x)>>11) & 1)
> #define NREC_RANK(x) (((x)>>8) & 0x7)
> #define NRECMEMB 0xC0
> -#define NREC_CAS(x) (((x)>>16) & 0xFFFFFF)
> +#define NREC_CAS(x) (((x)>>16) & 0x1FFF)
That is still incorrect. According to the 5000? datasheet above,
NRECMEMB has the CAS field in bits [27:16]. That's 12 bits, so the mask
should be 0xFFF. IOW,
#define NREC_CAS(x) (((x)>>16) & 0xFFF)
The 0x1FFF mask is correct for the 5400 driver because the CAS field
there is [28:16].
The fact that no one caught this by now goes to show how many people are
actually using this thing. :-\
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] edac, i5000, i5400: fix definition of nrecmemb register
@ 2017-06-29 0:54 ` Jérémy Lefaure
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jérémy Lefaure @ 2017-06-29 0:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Borislav Petkov; +Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab, linux-edac, linux-kernel
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 18:08:51 +0200
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:47:58PM -0400, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:
> > In i5000 and i5400 edac drivers, the register nrecmemb is defined as a
> > 16 bits value which result in wrong shifts in the code:
> > CHECK drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
> > drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c:485:15: warning: right shift by bigger than
> > source value
> > drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c:580:23: warning: right shift by bigger than
> > source value
> > CC drivers/edac/i5000_edac.o
> > CHECK drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
> > drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c:391:36: warning: right shift by bigger than
> > source value
> > drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c:401:37: warning: right shift by bigger than
> > source value
> > CC drivers/edac/i5400_edac.o
> >
> > In the datasheets ([1], section 3.9.22.20 and [2], section 3.9.22.21),
> > this register is a 32 bits register. A u32 value for the register fixes
> > the wrong shifts warnings and matches the datasheet.
> >
> > This patch also fixes the mask to access to the CAS bits [16 to 28] in
> > the i5000 edac driver.
> >
> > [1]: https://www.intel.com/content/dam/doc/datasheet/5000p-5000v-5000z-chipset-memory-controller-hub-datasheet.pdf
>
> Well, the CAS field length here is [27:16], see below.
>
> > [2]: https://www.intel.se/content/dam/doc/datasheet/5400-chipset-memory-controller-hub-datasheet.pdf
>
> Here it is [28:16].
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jérémy Lefaure <jeremy.lefaure@lse.epita.fr>
> > ---
> >
> > I have found this error thanks to the sparse tool. Please note that this patch
> > hasn't been tested on real hardware.
> >
> >
> > drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c | 6 +++---
> > drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c | 4 ++--
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c b/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
> > index f683919981b0..c79016ade51e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
> > +++ b/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
> > @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@
> > #define NREC_RDWR(x) (((x)>>11) & 1)
> > #define NREC_RANK(x) (((x)>>8) & 0x7)
> > #define NRECMEMB 0xC0
> > -#define NREC_CAS(x) (((x)>>16) & 0xFFFFFF)
> > +#define NREC_CAS(x) (((x)>>16) & 0x1FFF)
>
> That is still incorrect. According to the 5000? datasheet above,
> NRECMEMB has the CAS field in bits [27:16]. That's 12 bits, so the mask
> should be 0xFFF. IOW,
>
> #define NREC_CAS(x) (((x)>>16) & 0xFFF)
>
> The 0x1FFF mask is correct for the 5400 driver because the CAS field
> there is [28:16].
>
> The fact that no one caught this by now goes to show how many people are
> actually using this thing. :-\
>
You're right. I think that I inverted the 2 datasheets when I reread my
patch before sending it. Sorry about that. I will send a v2.
Jérémy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* edac, i5000, i5400: fix definition of nrecmemb register
@ 2017-06-29 0:54 ` Jérémy Lefaure
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jérémy Lefaure @ 2017-06-29 0:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Borislav Petkov; +Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab, linux-edac, linux-kernel
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 18:08:51 +0200
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:47:58PM -0400, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:
> > In i5000 and i5400 edac drivers, the register nrecmemb is defined as a
> > 16 bits value which result in wrong shifts in the code:
> > CHECK drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
> > drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c:485:15: warning: right shift by bigger than
> > source value
> > drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c:580:23: warning: right shift by bigger than
> > source value
> > CC drivers/edac/i5000_edac.o
> > CHECK drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
> > drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c:391:36: warning: right shift by bigger than
> > source value
> > drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c:401:37: warning: right shift by bigger than
> > source value
> > CC drivers/edac/i5400_edac.o
> >
> > In the datasheets ([1], section 3.9.22.20 and [2], section 3.9.22.21),
> > this register is a 32 bits register. A u32 value for the register fixes
> > the wrong shifts warnings and matches the datasheet.
> >
> > This patch also fixes the mask to access to the CAS bits [16 to 28] in
> > the i5000 edac driver.
> >
> > [1]: https://www.intel.com/content/dam/doc/datasheet/5000p-5000v-5000z-chipset-memory-controller-hub-datasheet.pdf
>
> Well, the CAS field length here is [27:16], see below.
>
> > [2]: https://www.intel.se/content/dam/doc/datasheet/5400-chipset-memory-controller-hub-datasheet.pdf
>
> Here it is [28:16].
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jérémy Lefaure <jeremy.lefaure@lse.epita.fr>
> > ---
> >
> > I have found this error thanks to the sparse tool. Please note that this patch
> > hasn't been tested on real hardware.
> >
> >
> > drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c | 6 +++---
> > drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c | 4 ++--
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c b/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
> > index f683919981b0..c79016ade51e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
> > +++ b/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
> > @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@
> > #define NREC_RDWR(x) (((x)>>11) & 1)
> > #define NREC_RANK(x) (((x)>>8) & 0x7)
> > #define NRECMEMB 0xC0
> > -#define NREC_CAS(x) (((x)>>16) & 0xFFFFFF)
> > +#define NREC_CAS(x) (((x)>>16) & 0x1FFF)
>
> That is still incorrect. According to the 5000? datasheet above,
> NRECMEMB has the CAS field in bits [27:16]. That's 12 bits, so the mask
> should be 0xFFF. IOW,
>
> #define NREC_CAS(x) (((x)>>16) & 0xFFF)
>
> The 0x1FFF mask is correct for the 5400 driver because the CAS field
> there is [28:16].
>
> The fact that no one caught this by now goes to show how many people are
> actually using this thing. :-\
>
You're right. I think that I inverted the 2 datasheets when I reread my
patch before sending it. Sorry about that. I will send a v2.
Jérémy
---
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-edac" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] edac, i5000, i5400: fix definition of nrecmemb register
@ 2017-06-29 0:57 ` Jérémy Lefaure
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jérémy Lefaure @ 2017-06-29 0:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Borislav Petkov, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Cc: Jérémy Lefaure, linux-edac, linux-kernel
In i5000 and i5400 edac drivers, the register nrecmemb is defined as a
16 bits value which result in wrong shifts in the code:
CHECK drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c:485:15: warning: right shift by bigger than
source value
drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c:580:23: warning: right shift by bigger than
source value
CC drivers/edac/i5000_edac.o
CHECK drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c:391:36: warning: right shift by bigger than
source value
drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c:401:37: warning: right shift by bigger than
source value
CC drivers/edac/i5400_edac.o
In the datasheets ([1], section 3.9.22.20 and [2], section 3.9.22.21),
this register is a 32 bits register. A u32 value for the register fixes
the wrong shifts warnings and matches the datasheet.
This patch also fixes the mask to access to the CAS bits [27:16] in
the i5000 edac driver.
[1]: https://www.intel.com/content/dam/doc/datasheet/5000p-5000v-5000z-chipset-memory-controller-hub-datasheet.pdf
[2]: https://www.intel.se/content/dam/doc/datasheet/5400-chipset-memory-controller-hub-datasheet.pdf
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Lefaure <jeremy.lefaure@lse.epita.fr>
---
I have found this error thanks to the sparse tool. Please note that this patch
hasn't been tested on real hardware.
v2:
* fix mask in NREC_CAS macro (0xFFF instead of 0x1FFF)
* fix bits description ("[27:16] instead of "[16 to 28]") in commit message
drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c | 6 +++---
drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c b/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
index f683919981b0..8f5a56e25bd2 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@
#define NREC_RDWR(x) (((x)>>11) & 1)
#define NREC_RANK(x) (((x)>>8) & 0x7)
#define NRECMEMB 0xC0
-#define NREC_CAS(x) (((x)>>16) & 0xFFFFFF)
+#define NREC_CAS(x) (((x)>>16) & 0xFFF)
#define NREC_RAS(x) ((x) & 0x7FFF)
#define NRECFGLOG 0xC4
#define NREEECFBDA 0xC8
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ struct i5000_error_info {
/* These registers are input ONLY if there was a
* Non-Recoverable Error */
u16 nrecmema; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log A */
- u16 nrecmemb; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log B */
+ u32 nrecmemb; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log B */
};
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static void i5000_get_error_info(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
NERR_FAT_FBD, &info->nerr_fat_fbd);
pci_read_config_word(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
NRECMEMA, &info->nrecmema);
- pci_read_config_word(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
+ pci_read_config_dword(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
NRECMEMB, &info->nrecmemb);
/* Clear the error bits, by writing them back */
diff --git a/drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c b/drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
index 37a9ba71da44..cd889edc8516 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ struct i5400_error_info {
/* These registers are input ONLY if there was a Non-Rec Error */
u16 nrecmema; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log A */
- u16 nrecmemb; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log B */
+ u32 nrecmemb; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log B */
};
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static void i5400_get_error_info(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
NERR_FAT_FBD, &info->nerr_fat_fbd);
pci_read_config_word(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
NRECMEMA, &info->nrecmema);
- pci_read_config_word(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
+ pci_read_config_dword(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
NRECMEMB, &info->nrecmemb);
/* Clear the error bits, by writing them back */
--
2.13.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [v2] edac, i5000, i5400: fix definition of nrecmemb register
@ 2017-06-29 0:57 ` Jérémy Lefaure
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jérémy Lefaure @ 2017-06-29 0:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Borislav Petkov, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Cc: Jérémy Lefaure, linux-edac, linux-kernel
In i5000 and i5400 edac drivers, the register nrecmemb is defined as a
16 bits value which result in wrong shifts in the code:
CHECK drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c:485:15: warning: right shift by bigger than
source value
drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c:580:23: warning: right shift by bigger than
source value
CC drivers/edac/i5000_edac.o
CHECK drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c:391:36: warning: right shift by bigger than
source value
drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c:401:37: warning: right shift by bigger than
source value
CC drivers/edac/i5400_edac.o
In the datasheets ([1], section 3.9.22.20 and [2], section 3.9.22.21),
this register is a 32 bits register. A u32 value for the register fixes
the wrong shifts warnings and matches the datasheet.
This patch also fixes the mask to access to the CAS bits [27:16] in
the i5000 edac driver.
[1]: https://www.intel.com/content/dam/doc/datasheet/5000p-5000v-5000z-chipset-memory-controller-hub-datasheet.pdf
[2]: https://www.intel.se/content/dam/doc/datasheet/5400-chipset-memory-controller-hub-datasheet.pdf
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Lefaure <jeremy.lefaure@lse.epita.fr>
---
I have found this error thanks to the sparse tool. Please note that this patch
hasn't been tested on real hardware.
v2:
* fix mask in NREC_CAS macro (0xFFF instead of 0x1FFF)
* fix bits description ("[27:16] instead of "[16 to 28]") in commit message
drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c | 6 +++---
drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c b/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
index f683919981b0..8f5a56e25bd2 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@
#define NREC_RDWR(x) (((x)>>11) & 1)
#define NREC_RANK(x) (((x)>>8) & 0x7)
#define NRECMEMB 0xC0
-#define NREC_CAS(x) (((x)>>16) & 0xFFFFFF)
+#define NREC_CAS(x) (((x)>>16) & 0xFFF)
#define NREC_RAS(x) ((x) & 0x7FFF)
#define NRECFGLOG 0xC4
#define NREEECFBDA 0xC8
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ struct i5000_error_info {
/* These registers are input ONLY if there was a
* Non-Recoverable Error */
u16 nrecmema; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log A */
- u16 nrecmemb; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log B */
+ u32 nrecmemb; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log B */
};
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static void i5000_get_error_info(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
NERR_FAT_FBD, &info->nerr_fat_fbd);
pci_read_config_word(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
NRECMEMA, &info->nrecmema);
- pci_read_config_word(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
+ pci_read_config_dword(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
NRECMEMB, &info->nrecmemb);
/* Clear the error bits, by writing them back */
diff --git a/drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c b/drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
index 37a9ba71da44..cd889edc8516 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ struct i5400_error_info {
/* These registers are input ONLY if there was a Non-Rec Error */
u16 nrecmema; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log A */
- u16 nrecmemb; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log B */
+ u32 nrecmemb; /* Non-Recoverable Mem log B */
};
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static void i5400_get_error_info(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
NERR_FAT_FBD, &info->nerr_fat_fbd);
pci_read_config_word(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
NRECMEMA, &info->nrecmema);
- pci_read_config_word(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
+ pci_read_config_dword(pvt->branchmap_werrors,
NRECMEMB, &info->nrecmemb);
/* Clear the error bits, by writing them back */
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] edac, i5000, i5400: fix definition of nrecmemb register
@ 2017-06-29 8:36 ` Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2017-06-29 8:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jérémy Lefaure; +Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab, linux-edac, linux-kernel
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 08:57:29PM -0400, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:
> In i5000 and i5400 edac drivers, the register nrecmemb is defined as a
> 16 bits value which result in wrong shifts in the code:
> CHECK drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
> drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c:485:15: warning: right shift by bigger than
> source value
> drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c:580:23: warning: right shift by bigger than
> source value
> CC drivers/edac/i5000_edac.o
> CHECK drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
> drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c:391:36: warning: right shift by bigger than
> source value
> drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c:401:37: warning: right shift by bigger than
> source value
> CC drivers/edac/i5400_edac.o
>
> In the datasheets ([1], section 3.9.22.20 and [2], section 3.9.22.21),
> this register is a 32 bits register. A u32 value for the register fixes
> the wrong shifts warnings and matches the datasheet.
>
> This patch also fixes the mask to access to the CAS bits [27:16] in
> the i5000 edac driver.
>
> [1]: https://www.intel.com/content/dam/doc/datasheet/5000p-5000v-5000z-chipset-memory-controller-hub-datasheet.pdf
> [2]: https://www.intel.se/content/dam/doc/datasheet/5400-chipset-memory-controller-hub-datasheet.pdf
>
> Signed-off-by: Jérémy Lefaure <jeremy.lefaure@lse.epita.fr>
> ---
>
> I have found this error thanks to the sparse tool. Please note that this patch
> hasn't been tested on real hardware.
>
> v2:
> * fix mask in NREC_CAS macro (0xFFF instead of 0x1FFF)
> * fix bits description ("[27:16] instead of "[16 to 28]") in commit message
>
>
> drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [v2] edac, i5000, i5400: fix definition of nrecmemb register
@ 2017-06-29 8:36 ` Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2017-06-29 8:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jérémy Lefaure; +Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab, linux-edac, linux-kernel
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 08:57:29PM -0400, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:
> In i5000 and i5400 edac drivers, the register nrecmemb is defined as a
> 16 bits value which result in wrong shifts in the code:
> CHECK drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c
> drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c:485:15: warning: right shift by bigger than
> source value
> drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c:580:23: warning: right shift by bigger than
> source value
> CC drivers/edac/i5000_edac.o
> CHECK drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
> drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c:391:36: warning: right shift by bigger than
> source value
> drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c:401:37: warning: right shift by bigger than
> source value
> CC drivers/edac/i5400_edac.o
>
> In the datasheets ([1], section 3.9.22.20 and [2], section 3.9.22.21),
> this register is a 32 bits register. A u32 value for the register fixes
> the wrong shifts warnings and matches the datasheet.
>
> This patch also fixes the mask to access to the CAS bits [27:16] in
> the i5000 edac driver.
>
> [1]: https://www.intel.com/content/dam/doc/datasheet/5000p-5000v-5000z-chipset-memory-controller-hub-datasheet.pdf
> [2]: https://www.intel.se/content/dam/doc/datasheet/5400-chipset-memory-controller-hub-datasheet.pdf
>
> Signed-off-by: Jérémy Lefaure <jeremy.lefaure@lse.epita.fr>
> ---
>
> I have found this error thanks to the sparse tool. Please note that this patch
> hasn't been tested on real hardware.
>
> v2:
> * fix mask in NREC_CAS macro (0xFFF instead of 0x1FFF)
> * fix bits description ("[27:16] instead of "[16 to 28]") in commit message
>
>
> drivers/edac/i5000_edac.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-06-29 8:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-06-12 17:47 [PATCH] edac, i5000, i5400: fix definition of nrecmemb register Jérémy Lefaure
2017-06-12 17:47 ` Jérémy Lefaure
2017-06-28 16:08 ` [PATCH] " Borislav Petkov
2017-06-28 16:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-06-29 0:54 ` [PATCH] " Jérémy Lefaure
2017-06-29 0:54 ` Jérémy Lefaure
2017-06-29 0:57 ` [PATCH v2] " Jérémy Lefaure
2017-06-29 0:57 ` [v2] " Jérémy Lefaure
2017-06-29 8:36 ` [PATCH v2] " Borislav Petkov
2017-06-29 8:36 ` [v2] " Borislav Petkov
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.