All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Piotr Luc" <piotr.luc@intel.com>,
	"Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	"Fenghua Yu" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	"Lu Baolu" <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	"Reza Arbab" <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"Matt Fleming" <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	"Laura Abbott" <labbott@redhat.com>,
	"Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Eric Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	"Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@samba.org>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Dave Airlie" <airlied@redhat.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Christoph Lameter" <cl@linux.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 11/17] x86/mm, resource: Use PAGE_KERNEL protection for ioremap of memory pages
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 06:02:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170802040255.GA4336@nazgul.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170724190757.11278-12-brijesh.singh@amd.com>

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 02:07:51PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> 
> In order for memory pages to be properly mapped when SEV is active, we
> need to use the PAGE_KERNEL protection attribute as the base protection.
> This will insure that memory mapping of, e.g. ACPI tables, receives the
> proper mapping attributes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c  | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/ioport.h |  3 +++
>  kernel/resource.c      | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> index c0be7cf..7b27332 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> @@ -69,6 +69,26 @@ static int __ioremap_check_ram(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int __ioremap_res_desc_other(struct resource *res, void *arg)
> +{
> +	return (res->desc != IORES_DESC_NONE);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * This function returns true if the target memory is marked as
> + * IORESOURCE_MEM and IORESOURCE_BUSY and described as other than
> + * IORES_DESC_NONE (e.g. IORES_DESC_ACPI_TABLES).
> + */
> +static bool __ioremap_check_if_mem(resource_size_t addr, unsigned long size)
> +{
> +	u64 start, end;
> +
> +	start = (u64)addr;
> +	end = start + size - 1;
> +
> +	return (walk_mem_res(start, end, NULL, __ioremap_res_desc_other) == 1);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Remap an arbitrary physical address space into the kernel virtual
>   * address space. It transparently creates kernel huge I/O mapping when
> @@ -146,7 +166,15 @@ static void __iomem *__ioremap_caller(resource_size_t phys_addr,
>  		pcm = new_pcm;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If the page being mapped is in memory and SEV is active then
> +	 * make sure the memory encryption attribute is enabled in the
> +	 * resulting mapping.
> +	 */
>  	prot = PAGE_KERNEL_IO;
> +	if (sev_active() && __ioremap_check_if_mem(phys_addr, size))
> +		prot = pgprot_encrypted(prot);

Hmm, so this function already does walk_system_ram_range() a bit
earlier and now on SEV systems we're going to do it again. Can we make
walk_system_ram_range() return a distinct value for SEV systems and act
accordingly in __ioremap_caller() instead of repeating the operation?

It looks to me like we could...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
-- 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
	kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Piotr Luc <piotr.luc-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
	Reza Arbab
	<arbab-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Matt Fleming
	<matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov"
	<kirill.shutemov-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel
	<ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Andrew Morton
	<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
	Eric
Subject: Re: [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 11/17] x86/mm, resource: Use PAGE_KERNEL protection for ioremap of memory pages
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 06:02:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170802040255.GA4336@nazgul.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170724190757.11278-12-brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 02:07:51PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
> 
> In order for memory pages to be properly mapped when SEV is active, we
> need to use the PAGE_KERNEL protection attribute as the base protection.
> This will insure that memory mapping of, e.g. ACPI tables, receives the
> proper mapping attributes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c  | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/ioport.h |  3 +++
>  kernel/resource.c      | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> index c0be7cf..7b27332 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> @@ -69,6 +69,26 @@ static int __ioremap_check_ram(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int __ioremap_res_desc_other(struct resource *res, void *arg)
> +{
> +	return (res->desc != IORES_DESC_NONE);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * This function returns true if the target memory is marked as
> + * IORESOURCE_MEM and IORESOURCE_BUSY and described as other than
> + * IORES_DESC_NONE (e.g. IORES_DESC_ACPI_TABLES).
> + */
> +static bool __ioremap_check_if_mem(resource_size_t addr, unsigned long size)
> +{
> +	u64 start, end;
> +
> +	start = (u64)addr;
> +	end = start + size - 1;
> +
> +	return (walk_mem_res(start, end, NULL, __ioremap_res_desc_other) == 1);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Remap an arbitrary physical address space into the kernel virtual
>   * address space. It transparently creates kernel huge I/O mapping when
> @@ -146,7 +166,15 @@ static void __iomem *__ioremap_caller(resource_size_t phys_addr,
>  		pcm = new_pcm;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If the page being mapped is in memory and SEV is active then
> +	 * make sure the memory encryption attribute is enabled in the
> +	 * resulting mapping.
> +	 */
>  	prot = PAGE_KERNEL_IO;
> +	if (sev_active() && __ioremap_check_if_mem(phys_addr, size))
> +		prot = pgprot_encrypted(prot);

Hmm, so this function already does walk_system_ram_range() a bit
earlier and now on SEV systems we're going to do it again. Can we make
walk_system_ram_range() return a distinct value for SEV systems and act
accordingly in __ioremap_caller() instead of repeating the operation?

It looks to me like we could...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
-- 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
	kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Piotr Luc <piotr.luc-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
	Reza Arbab
	<arbab-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Matt Fleming
	<matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov"
	<kirill.shutemov-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel
	<ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Andrew Morton
	<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
	Eric Biederma
Subject: Re: [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 11/17] x86/mm, resource: Use PAGE_KERNEL protection for ioremap of memory pages
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 06:02:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170802040255.GA4336@nazgul.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170724190757.11278-12-brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 02:07:51PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
> 
> In order for memory pages to be properly mapped when SEV is active, we
> need to use the PAGE_KERNEL protection attribute as the base protection.
> This will insure that memory mapping of, e.g. ACPI tables, receives the
> proper mapping attributes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c  | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/ioport.h |  3 +++
>  kernel/resource.c      | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> index c0be7cf..7b27332 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> @@ -69,6 +69,26 @@ static int __ioremap_check_ram(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int __ioremap_res_desc_other(struct resource *res, void *arg)
> +{
> +	return (res->desc != IORES_DESC_NONE);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * This function returns true if the target memory is marked as
> + * IORESOURCE_MEM and IORESOURCE_BUSY and described as other than
> + * IORES_DESC_NONE (e.g. IORES_DESC_ACPI_TABLES).
> + */
> +static bool __ioremap_check_if_mem(resource_size_t addr, unsigned long size)
> +{
> +	u64 start, end;
> +
> +	start = (u64)addr;
> +	end = start + size - 1;
> +
> +	return (walk_mem_res(start, end, NULL, __ioremap_res_desc_other) == 1);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Remap an arbitrary physical address space into the kernel virtual
>   * address space. It transparently creates kernel huge I/O mapping when
> @@ -146,7 +166,15 @@ static void __iomem *__ioremap_caller(resource_size_t phys_addr,
>  		pcm = new_pcm;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If the page being mapped is in memory and SEV is active then
> +	 * make sure the memory encryption attribute is enabled in the
> +	 * resulting mapping.
> +	 */
>  	prot = PAGE_KERNEL_IO;
> +	if (sev_active() && __ioremap_check_if_mem(phys_addr, size))
> +		prot = pgprot_encrypted(prot);

Hmm, so this function already does walk_system_ram_range() a bit
earlier and now on SEV systems we're going to do it again. Can we make
walk_system_ram_range() return a distinct value for SEV systems and act
accordingly in __ioremap_caller() instead of repeating the operation?

It looks to me like we could...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
-- 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-02  4:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 226+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-24 19:07 [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 00/17] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 01/17] Documentation/x86: Add AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) descrption Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-25  5:45   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25  5:45     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25  5:45     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25 14:59     ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-25 14:59       ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-25 14:59       ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 02/17] x86/CPU/AMD: Add the Secure Encrypted Virtualization CPU feature Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-25 10:26   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25 10:26     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25 10:26     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25 14:29     ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-25 14:29       ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-25 14:29       ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-25 14:36       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25 14:36         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25 14:36         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25 14:58         ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-25 14:58           ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-25 14:58           ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-25 15:13           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25 15:13             ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25 15:13             ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25 15:29             ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-25 15:29               ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-25 15:29               ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-25 15:33               ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25 15:33                 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25 15:33                 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-09 18:17                 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-09 18:17                   ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17  8:12                   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-17  8:12                     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-17  8:12                     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 03/17] x86/mm: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) support Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-26  4:28   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-26  4:28     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-26  4:28     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-26 16:47     ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-26 16:47       ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-26 16:47       ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-27 13:39       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-27 13:39         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-27 13:39         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 04/17] x86/mm: Don't attempt to encrypt initrd under SEV Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-26 14:44   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-26 14:44     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-26 14:44     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 05/17] x86, realmode: Don't decrypt trampoline area " Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-26 16:03   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-26 16:03     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-26 16:03     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-10 13:03     ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-10 13:03       ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-10 13:03       ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 06/17] x86/mm: Use encrypted access of boot related data with SEV Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-27 13:31   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-27 13:31     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-27 13:31     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-17 18:05     ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 18:05       ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 18:05       ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 07/17] x86/mm: Include SEV for encryption memory attribute changes Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-27 14:58   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-27 14:58     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-27 14:58     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-28  8:47     ` David Laight
2017-07-28  8:47       ` David Laight
2017-07-28  8:47       ` David Laight
2017-08-17 18:21       ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 18:21         ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 18:10     ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 18:10       ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 18:10       ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 08/17] x86/efi: Access EFI data as encrypted when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-28 10:31   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-28 10:31     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-28 10:31     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-17 18:42     ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 18:42       ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 18:42       ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 09/17] resource: Consolidate resource walking code Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-28 15:23   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-28 15:23     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-28 15:23     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-17 18:55     ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 18:55       ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 18:55       ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 19:03       ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 19:03         ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 19:03         ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 10/17] resource: Provide resource struct in resource walk callback Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-31  8:26   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-31  8:26     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-31  8:26     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-31 22:19   ` Kees Cook
2017-07-31 22:19     ` Kees Cook
2017-07-31 22:19     ` Kees Cook
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 11/17] x86/mm, resource: Use PAGE_KERNEL protection for ioremap of memory pages Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-08-02  4:02   ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2017-08-02  4:02     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-02  4:02     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-17 19:22     ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 19:22       ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 19:22       ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 12/17] x86/mm: DMA support for SEV memory encryption Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-08-07  3:48   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-07  3:48     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-07  3:48     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-17 19:35     ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 19:35       ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 19:35       ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 13/17] x86/io: Unroll string I/O when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-25  9:51   ` David Laight
2017-07-25  9:51     ` David Laight
2017-07-25  9:51     ` David Laight
2017-07-26 10:45     ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-07-26 10:45       ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-07-26 19:24       ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-26 19:24         ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-26 19:26         ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-07-26 19:26           ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-07-26 19:26           ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-07-26 19:26           ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-07-26 20:07           ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-26 20:07             ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-27  7:45             ` David Laight
2017-07-27  7:45               ` David Laight
2017-07-27  7:45               ` David Laight
2017-08-22 16:52             ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-22 16:52               ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-15 12:24               ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-15 12:24                 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-15 14:13                 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-15 14:13                   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-15 14:40                   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-15 14:40                     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-15 14:48                     ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-15 14:48                       ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-15 16:22                       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-15 16:22                         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-15 16:27                         ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-15 16:27                           ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 14/17] x86/boot: Add early boot support when running with SEV active Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-08-23 15:30   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-23 15:30     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-23 15:30     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-24 18:54     ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-24 18:54       ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-24 18:54       ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-25 12:54       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-25 12:54         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-25 12:54         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 15/17] x86: Add support for changing memory encryption attribute in early boot Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-08-28 10:51   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-28 10:51     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-28 10:51     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-28 11:49     ` Brijesh Singh
2017-08-28 11:49       ` Brijesh Singh
2017-08-28 11:49       ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 16/17] X86/KVM: Provide support to create Guest and HV shared per-CPU variables Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-08-29 10:22   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-29 10:22     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-29 10:22     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-30 16:18     ` Brijesh Singh
2017-08-30 16:18       ` Brijesh Singh
2017-08-30 16:18       ` Brijesh Singh
2017-08-30 17:46       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-30 17:46         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-30 17:46         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-01 22:52         ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-01 22:52           ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-01 22:52           ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-02  3:21           ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-02  3:21             ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-02  3:21             ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-03  2:34             ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-03  2:34               ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-03  2:34               ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-04 17:05           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-04 17:05             ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-04 17:05             ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-04 17:47             ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-04 17:47               ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-04 17:47               ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 17/17] X86/KVM: Clear encryption attribute when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-08-31 15:06   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-31 15:06     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-31 15:06     ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170802040255.GA4336@nazgul.tnic \
    --to=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=piotr.luc@intel.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.