* IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update
@ 2017-12-01 18:15 Bruno E. O. Meneguele
2017-12-04 12:55 ` Mimi Zohar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bruno E. O. Meneguele @ 2017-12-01 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dmitry.kasatkin, zohar; +Cc: linux-integrity
[-- Attachment #1: Type: multipart/signed, Size: 694 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update
2017-12-01 18:15 IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update Bruno E. O. Meneguele
@ 2017-12-04 12:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-12-04 17:14 ` Bruno E. O. Meneguele
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mimi Zohar @ 2017-12-04 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruno E. O. Meneguele, dmitry.kasatkin; +Cc: linux-integrity
On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 16:15 -0200, Bruno E. O. Meneguele wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I don't really know what are your best interest in update ima-evm-utils
> 1.0 package to support OpenSSL 1.1 new interface considering lots of
> distros are chaging to it as the default one. Some are maintaining
> compatibility packages to OpenSSL 1.0, but usually it remains available
> in the official repos for something like 1 or 2 releases and then
> removed completely.
>
> Actually I have a simple/small port of it to OpenSSL 1.1 that I plan to
> maintain for Fedora's Rawhide (next release, f28) package. Do you guys
> have interest on it? I could post it as a patch.
>
> Thanks!
Yes, I'd really appreciate it. We need to release the new EVM
portable signature support as well.
thanks,
Mimi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update
2017-12-04 12:55 ` Mimi Zohar
@ 2017-12-04 17:14 ` Bruno E. O. Meneguele
2017-12-04 19:18 ` Mimi Zohar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bruno E. O. Meneguele @ 2017-12-04 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mimi Zohar; +Cc: dmitry.kasatkin, linux-integrity
[-- Attachment #1: Type: multipart/signed, Size: 1117 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update
2017-12-04 17:14 ` Bruno E. O. Meneguele
@ 2017-12-04 19:18 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-12-07 1:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mimi Zohar @ 2017-12-04 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruno E. O. Meneguele, Jarkko Sakkinen; +Cc: dmitry.kasatkin, linux-integrity
On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 15:14 -0200, Bruno E. O. Meneguele wrote:
> On 04-12, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 16:15 -0200, Bruno E. O. Meneguele wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I don't really know what are your best interest in update ima-evm-utils
> > > 1.0 package to support OpenSSL 1.1 new interface considering lots of
> > > distros are chaging to it as the default one. Some are maintaining
> > > compatibility packages to OpenSSL 1.0, but usually it remains available
> > > in the official repos for something like 1 or 2 releases and then
> > > removed completely.
> > >
> > > Actually I have a simple/small port of it to OpenSSL 1.1 that I plan to
> > > maintain for Fedora's Rawhide (next release, f28) package. Do you guys
> > > have interest on it? I could post it as a patch.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> >
> > Yes, I'd really appreciate it. We need to release the new EVM
> > portable signature support as well.
> >
>
> Perfect! should I post with some different subject prefix or something
> like that to let things clear that is a patch for the userspace app?
In general, now that we have a shared mailing list with TPM, the
subject line should be prefixed with the kernel subystem (eg. "ima:",
"evm:", "tpm:").
Similarly we could do the equivalent for userspace applications (eg.
"ima-evm-utils:").
Jarkko, is that ok?
Mimi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update
2017-12-04 19:18 ` Mimi Zohar
@ 2017-12-07 1:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-12-07 12:19 ` Bruno E. O. Meneguele
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2017-12-07 1:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mimi Zohar; +Cc: Bruno E. O. Meneguele, dmitry.kasatkin, linux-integrity
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 02:18:26PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> In general, now that we have a shared mailing list with TPM, the
> subject line should be prefixed with the kernel subystem (eg. "ima:",
> "evm:", "tpm:").
>
> Similarly we could do the equivalent for userspace applications (eg.
> "ima-evm-utils:").
>
> Jarkko, is that ok?
It is fine for me.
/Jarkko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update
2017-12-07 1:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
@ 2017-12-07 12:19 ` Bruno E. O. Meneguele
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bruno E. O. Meneguele @ 2017-12-07 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jarkko Sakkinen; +Cc: Mimi Zohar, dmitry.kasatkin, linux-integrity
[-- Attachment #1: Type: multipart/signed, Size: 625 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-12-07 12:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-12-01 18:15 IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update Bruno E. O. Meneguele
2017-12-04 12:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-12-04 17:14 ` Bruno E. O. Meneguele
2017-12-04 19:18 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-12-07 1:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-12-07 12:19 ` Bruno E. O. Meneguele
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.