From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
afaerber@suse.de, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
liuwei@actions-semi.com, mp-cs@actions-semi.com,
96boards@ucrobotics.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, mchehab@kernel.org,
daniel.thompson@linaro.org, amit.kucheria@linaro.org,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, hzhang@ucrobotics.com,
bdong@ucrobotics.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
manivannanece23@gmail.com,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/12] clk: actions: Add factor clock support
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 09:41:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201803200916.tC5n98xo%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180317100952.28538-9-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9125 bytes --]
Hi Manivannan,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on v4.16-rc4]
[cannot apply to next-20180319]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Manivannan-Sadhasivam/Add-clock-driver-for-Actions-S900-SoC/20180319-015124
config: arm-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Debian 7.2.0-11) 7.2.0
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make.cross ARCH=arm
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:127:0,
from include/linux/kernel.h:173,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18,
from arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h:60,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/io.h:23,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c:11:
drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c: In function 'owl_factor_helper_recalc_rate':
include/asm-generic/div64.h:222:28: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
(void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0)); \
^
drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c:170:2: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
do_div(rate, div);
^~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/init.h:5:0,
from include/linux/io.h:22,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c:11:
include/asm-generic/div64.h:235:25: warning: right shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow]
} else if (likely(((n) >> 32) == 0)) { \
^
include/linux/compiler.h:76:40: note: in definition of macro 'likely'
# define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)
^
drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c:170:2: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
do_div(rate, div);
^~~~~~
In file included from arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:127:0,
from include/linux/kernel.h:173,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18,
from arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h:60,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/io.h:23,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c:11:
>> include/asm-generic/div64.h:239:22: error: passing argument 1 of '__div64_32' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
__rem = __div64_32(&(n), __base); \
^
drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c:170:2: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
do_div(rate, div);
^~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:173:0,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18,
from arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h:60,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/io.h:23,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c:11:
arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:33:24: note: expected 'uint64_t * {aka long long unsigned int *}' but argument is of type 'long unsigned int *'
static inline uint32_t __div64_32(uint64_t *n, uint32_t base)
^~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
In file included from arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:127:0,
from include/linux/kernel.h:173,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18,
from arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h:60,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/io.h:23,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c:11:
drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c: In function 'owl_factor_helper_recalc_rate':
include/asm-generic/div64.h:222:28: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
(void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0)); \
^
drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c:170:2: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
do_div(rate, div);
^~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/init.h:5:0,
from include/linux/io.h:22,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c:11:
include/asm-generic/div64.h:235:25: warning: right shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow]
} else if (likely(((n) >> 32) == 0)) { \
^
include/linux/compiler.h:76:40: note: in definition of macro 'likely'
# define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)
^
drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c:170:2: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
do_div(rate, div);
^~~~~~
In file included from arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:127:0,
from include/linux/kernel.h:173,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18,
from arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h:60,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/io.h:23,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c:11:
>> include/asm-generic/div64.h:239:22: error: passing argument 1 of '__div64_32' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
__rem = __div64_32(&(n), __base); \
^
drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c:170:2: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
do_div(rate, div);
^~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:173:0,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18,
from arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h:60,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/io.h:23,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c:11:
arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:33:24: note: expected 'uint64_t * {aka long long unsigned int *}' but argument is of type 'long unsigned int *'
static inline uint32_t __div64_32(uint64_t *n, uint32_t base)
^~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/__div64_32 +239 include/asm-generic/div64.h
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 215
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 216 /* The unnecessary pointer compare is there
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 217 * to check for type safety (n must be 64bit)
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 218 */
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 219 # define do_div(n,base) ({ \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 220 uint32_t __base = (base); \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 221 uint32_t __rem; \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 222 (void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0)); \
911918aa Nicolas Pitre 2015-11-02 223 if (__builtin_constant_p(__base) && \
911918aa Nicolas Pitre 2015-11-02 224 is_power_of_2(__base)) { \
911918aa Nicolas Pitre 2015-11-02 225 __rem = (n) & (__base - 1); \
911918aa Nicolas Pitre 2015-11-02 226 (n) >>= ilog2(__base); \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 227 } else if (__div64_const32_is_OK && \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 228 __builtin_constant_p(__base) && \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 229 __base != 0) { \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 230 uint32_t __res_lo, __n_lo = (n); \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 231 (n) = __div64_const32(n, __base); \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 232 /* the remainder can be computed with 32-bit regs */ \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 233 __res_lo = (n); \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 234 __rem = __n_lo - __res_lo * __base; \
911918aa Nicolas Pitre 2015-11-02 235 } else if (likely(((n) >> 32) == 0)) { \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 236 __rem = (uint32_t)(n) % __base; \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 237 (n) = (uint32_t)(n) / __base; \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 238 } else \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 @239 __rem = __div64_32(&(n), __base); \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 240 __rem; \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 241 })
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 242
:::::: The code at line 239 was first introduced by commit
:::::: 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
:::::: TO: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org>
:::::: CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org>
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 64883 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
afaerber@suse.de, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
liuwei@actions-semi.com, mp-cs@actions-semi.com,
96boards@ucrobotics.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, mchehab@kernel.org,
daniel.thompson@linaro.org, amit.kucheria@linaro.org,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, hzhang@ucrobotics.com,
bdong@ucrobotics.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
manivannanece23@gmail.com,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/12] clk: actions: Add factor clock support
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 09:41:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201803200916.tC5n98xo%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180317100952.28538-9-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9125 bytes --]
Hi Manivannan,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on v4.16-rc4]
[cannot apply to next-20180319]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Manivannan-Sadhasivam/Add-clock-driver-for-Actions-S900-SoC/20180319-015124
config: arm-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Debian 7.2.0-11) 7.2.0
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make.cross ARCH=arm
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:127:0,
from include/linux/kernel.h:173,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18,
from arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h:60,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/io.h:23,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c:11:
drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c: In function 'owl_factor_helper_recalc_rate':
include/asm-generic/div64.h:222:28: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
(void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0)); \
^
drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c:170:2: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
do_div(rate, div);
^~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/init.h:5:0,
from include/linux/io.h:22,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c:11:
include/asm-generic/div64.h:235:25: warning: right shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow]
} else if (likely(((n) >> 32) == 0)) { \
^
include/linux/compiler.h:76:40: note: in definition of macro 'likely'
# define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)
^
drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c:170:2: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
do_div(rate, div);
^~~~~~
In file included from arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:127:0,
from include/linux/kernel.h:173,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18,
from arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h:60,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/io.h:23,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c:11:
>> include/asm-generic/div64.h:239:22: error: passing argument 1 of '__div64_32' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
__rem = __div64_32(&(n), __base); \
^
drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c:170:2: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
do_div(rate, div);
^~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:173:0,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18,
from arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h:60,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/io.h:23,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c:11:
arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:33:24: note: expected 'uint64_t * {aka long long unsigned int *}' but argument is of type 'long unsigned int *'
static inline uint32_t __div64_32(uint64_t *n, uint32_t base)
^~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
In file included from arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:127:0,
from include/linux/kernel.h:173,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18,
from arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h:60,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/io.h:23,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c:11:
drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c: In function 'owl_factor_helper_recalc_rate':
include/asm-generic/div64.h:222:28: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
(void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0)); \
^
drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c:170:2: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
do_div(rate, div);
^~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/init.h:5:0,
from include/linux/io.h:22,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c:11:
include/asm-generic/div64.h:235:25: warning: right shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow]
} else if (likely(((n) >> 32) == 0)) { \
^
include/linux/compiler.h:76:40: note: in definition of macro 'likely'
# define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)
^
drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c:170:2: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
do_div(rate, div);
^~~~~~
In file included from arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:127:0,
from include/linux/kernel.h:173,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18,
from arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h:60,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/io.h:23,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c:11:
>> include/asm-generic/div64.h:239:22: error: passing argument 1 of '__div64_32' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
__rem = __div64_32(&(n), __base); \
^
drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c:170:2: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
do_div(rate, div);
^~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:173:0,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18,
from arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h:60,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/io.h:23,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c:11:
arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:33:24: note: expected 'uint64_t * {aka long long unsigned int *}' but argument is of type 'long unsigned int *'
static inline uint32_t __div64_32(uint64_t *n, uint32_t base)
^~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/__div64_32 +239 include/asm-generic/div64.h
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 215
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 216 /* The unnecessary pointer compare is there
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 217 * to check for type safety (n must be 64bit)
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 218 */
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 219 # define do_div(n,base) ({ \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 220 uint32_t __base = (base); \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 221 uint32_t __rem; \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 222 (void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0)); \
911918aa Nicolas Pitre 2015-11-02 223 if (__builtin_constant_p(__base) && \
911918aa Nicolas Pitre 2015-11-02 224 is_power_of_2(__base)) { \
911918aa Nicolas Pitre 2015-11-02 225 __rem = (n) & (__base - 1); \
911918aa Nicolas Pitre 2015-11-02 226 (n) >>= ilog2(__base); \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 227 } else if (__div64_const32_is_OK && \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 228 __builtin_constant_p(__base) && \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 229 __base != 0) { \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 230 uint32_t __res_lo, __n_lo = (n); \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 231 (n) = __div64_const32(n, __base); \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 232 /* the remainder can be computed with 32-bit regs */ \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 233 __res_lo = (n); \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 234 __rem = __n_lo - __res_lo * __base; \
911918aa Nicolas Pitre 2015-11-02 235 } else if (likely(((n) >> 32) == 0)) { \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 236 __rem = (uint32_t)(n) % __base; \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 237 (n) = (uint32_t)(n) / __base; \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 238 } else \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 @239 __rem = __div64_32(&(n), __base); \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 240 __rem; \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 241 })
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 242
:::::: The code at line 239 was first introduced by commit
:::::: 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
:::::: TO: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org>
:::::: CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org>
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 64883 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lkp@intel.com (kbuild test robot)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 08/12] clk: actions: Add factor clock support
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 09:41:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201803200916.tC5n98xo%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180317100952.28538-9-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Hi Manivannan,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on v4.16-rc4]
[cannot apply to next-20180319]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Manivannan-Sadhasivam/Add-clock-driver-for-Actions-S900-SoC/20180319-015124
config: arm-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Debian 7.2.0-11) 7.2.0
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make.cross ARCH=arm
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:127:0,
from include/linux/kernel.h:173,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18,
from arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h:60,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/io.h:23,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c:11:
drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c: In function 'owl_factor_helper_recalc_rate':
include/asm-generic/div64.h:222:28: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
(void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0)); \
^
drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c:170:2: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
do_div(rate, div);
^~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/init.h:5:0,
from include/linux/io.h:22,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c:11:
include/asm-generic/div64.h:235:25: warning: right shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow]
} else if (likely(((n) >> 32) == 0)) { \
^
include/linux/compiler.h:76:40: note: in definition of macro 'likely'
# define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)
^
drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c:170:2: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
do_div(rate, div);
^~~~~~
In file included from arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:127:0,
from include/linux/kernel.h:173,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18,
from arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h:60,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/io.h:23,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c:11:
>> include/asm-generic/div64.h:239:22: error: passing argument 1 of '__div64_32' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
__rem = __div64_32(&(n), __base); \
^
drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c:170:2: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
do_div(rate, div);
^~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:173:0,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18,
from arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h:60,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/io.h:23,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c:11:
arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:33:24: note: expected 'uint64_t * {aka long long unsigned int *}' but argument is of type 'long unsigned int *'
static inline uint32_t __div64_32(uint64_t *n, uint32_t base)
^~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
In file included from arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:127:0,
from include/linux/kernel.h:173,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18,
from arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h:60,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/io.h:23,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c:11:
drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c: In function 'owl_factor_helper_recalc_rate':
include/asm-generic/div64.h:222:28: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
(void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0)); \
^
drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c:170:2: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
do_div(rate, div);
^~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/init.h:5:0,
from include/linux/io.h:22,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c:11:
include/asm-generic/div64.h:235:25: warning: right shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow]
} else if (likely(((n) >> 32) == 0)) { \
^
include/linux/compiler.h:76:40: note: in definition of macro 'likely'
# define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)
^
drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c:170:2: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
do_div(rate, div);
^~~~~~
In file included from arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:127:0,
from include/linux/kernel.h:173,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18,
from arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h:60,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/io.h:23,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c:11:
>> include/asm-generic/div64.h:239:22: error: passing argument 1 of '__div64_32' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
__rem = __div64_32(&(n), __base); \
^
drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c:170:2: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
do_div(rate, div);
^~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:173:0,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18,
from arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h:60,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/io.h:23,
from include/linux/clk-provider.h:14,
from drivers/clk//actions/owl-factor.c:11:
arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:33:24: note: expected 'uint64_t * {aka long long unsigned int *}' but argument is of type 'long unsigned int *'
static inline uint32_t __div64_32(uint64_t *n, uint32_t base)
^~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/__div64_32 +239 include/asm-generic/div64.h
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 215
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 216 /* The unnecessary pointer compare is there
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 217 * to check for type safety (n must be 64bit)
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 218 */
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 219 # define do_div(n,base) ({ \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 220 uint32_t __base = (base); \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 221 uint32_t __rem; \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 222 (void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0)); \
911918aa Nicolas Pitre 2015-11-02 223 if (__builtin_constant_p(__base) && \
911918aa Nicolas Pitre 2015-11-02 224 is_power_of_2(__base)) { \
911918aa Nicolas Pitre 2015-11-02 225 __rem = (n) & (__base - 1); \
911918aa Nicolas Pitre 2015-11-02 226 (n) >>= ilog2(__base); \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 227 } else if (__div64_const32_is_OK && \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 228 __builtin_constant_p(__base) && \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 229 __base != 0) { \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 230 uint32_t __res_lo, __n_lo = (n); \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 231 (n) = __div64_const32(n, __base); \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 232 /* the remainder can be computed with 32-bit regs */ \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 233 __res_lo = (n); \
461a5e51 Nicolas Pitre 2015-10-30 234 __rem = __n_lo - __res_lo * __base; \
911918aa Nicolas Pitre 2015-11-02 235 } else if (likely(((n) >> 32) == 0)) { \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 236 __rem = (uint32_t)(n) % __base; \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 237 (n) = (uint32_t)(n) / __base; \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 238 } else \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 @239 __rem = __div64_32(&(n), __base); \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 240 __rem; \
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 241 })
^1da177e Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 242
:::::: The code at line 239 was first introduced by commit
:::::: 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
:::::: TO: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org>
:::::: CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org>
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: .config.gz
Type: application/gzip
Size: 64883 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180320/22fc4d87/attachment-0001.gz>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-20 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-17 10:09 [PATCH v5 00/12] Add clock driver for Actions S900 SoC Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-17 10:09 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-17 10:09 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] dt-bindings: clock: Add Actions S900 clock bindings Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-17 10:09 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-20 0:59 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 0:59 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 0:59 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 0:59 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-17 10:09 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] arm64: dts: actions: Add S900 clock management unit nodes Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-17 10:09 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-17 10:09 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] arm64: dts: actions: Source CMU clock for UART5 Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-17 10:09 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-17 10:09 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-17 10:09 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] clk: actions: Add common clock driver support Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-17 10:09 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-20 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-17 10:09 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] clk: actions: Add gate clock support Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-17 10:09 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-20 1:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-17 10:09 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] clk: actions: Add mux " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-17 10:09 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-20 1:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-17 10:09 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] clk: actions: Add divider " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-17 10:09 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-20 1:06 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:06 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:06 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:06 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-17 10:09 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] clk: actions: Add factor " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-17 10:09 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-18 20:31 ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-18 20:31 ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-18 20:31 ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-20 1:08 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:08 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:08 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:08 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:11 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:11 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:11 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:11 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:41 ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2018-03-20 1:41 ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-20 1:41 ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-17 10:09 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] clk: actions: Add fixed " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-17 10:09 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-20 1:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 1:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 9:04 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-20 9:04 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-20 17:15 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 17:15 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 17:15 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-17 10:09 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] clk: actions: Add composite " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-17 10:09 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-17 10:09 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] clk: actions: Add pll " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-17 10:09 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-17 10:09 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] clk: actions: Add S900 SoC " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-17 10:09 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-03-18 20:38 ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-18 20:38 ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-18 20:38 ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-18 21:28 ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-18 21:28 ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-18 21:28 ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-20 7:16 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 7:16 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 7:16 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 7:16 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201803200916.tC5n98xo%fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=96boards@ucrobotics.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
--cc=bdong@ucrobotics.com \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hzhang@ucrobotics.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuwei@actions-semi.com \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=manivannanece23@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mp-cs@actions-semi.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.