All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
	Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, robh@kernel.org,
	jorhand@linux.microsoft.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com, kitakar@gmail.com,
	bingbu.cao@intel.com, mchehab@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	tian.shu.qiu@intel.com, yong.zhi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Add bridge driver to connect sensors to CIO2 device via software nodes on ACPI platforms
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:25:29 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200917122529.GJ3956970@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200917104941.GP4282@kadam>

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 01:49:41PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 01:33:43PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:

> > > +	int i, ret;
> > 
> > unsigned int i
> > 
> 
> Why?
> 
> For list iterators then "int i;" is best...  For sizes then unsigned is
> sometimes best.  Or if it's part of the hardware spec or network spec
> unsigned is best.  Otherwise unsigned variables cause a ton of bugs.
> They're not as intuitive as signed variables.  Imagine if there is an
> error in this loop and you want to unwind.  With a signed variable you
> can do:
> 
> 	while (--i >= 0)
> 		cleanup(&bridge.sensors[i]);

Ha-ha. It's actually a counter argument to your stuff because above is the same as

	while (i--)
		cleanup(&bridge.sensors[i]);

with pretty much unsigned int i.

> There are very few times where raising the type maximum from 2 billion
> to 4 billion fixes anything.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, robh@kernel.org, mchehab@kernel.org,
	jorhand@linux.microsoft.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com,
	Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
	yong.zhi@intel.com, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
	bingbu.cao@intel.com, kitakar@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	tian.shu.qiu@intel.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Add bridge driver to connect sensors to CIO2 device via software nodes on ACPI platforms
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:25:29 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200917122529.GJ3956970@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200917104941.GP4282@kadam>

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 01:49:41PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 01:33:43PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:

> > > +	int i, ret;
> > 
> > unsigned int i
> > 
> 
> Why?
> 
> For list iterators then "int i;" is best...  For sizes then unsigned is
> sometimes best.  Or if it's part of the hardware spec or network spec
> unsigned is best.  Otherwise unsigned variables cause a ton of bugs.
> They're not as intuitive as signed variables.  Imagine if there is an
> error in this loop and you want to unwind.  With a signed variable you
> can do:
> 
> 	while (--i >= 0)
> 		cleanup(&bridge.sensors[i]);

Ha-ha. It's actually a counter argument to your stuff because above is the same as

	while (i--)
		cleanup(&bridge.sensors[i]);

with pretty much unsigned int i.

> There are very few times where raising the type maximum from 2 billion
> to 4 billion fixes anything.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-17 12:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-16 21:36 [RFC PATCH] Add bridge driver to connect sensors to CIO2 device via software nodes on ACPI platforms Daniel Scally
2020-09-16 21:36 ` Daniel Scally
2020-09-17  0:17 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-17  3:02 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-17  7:53 ` Greg KH
2020-09-17  7:53   ` Greg KH
2020-09-17  9:47   ` Dan Scally
2020-09-17  9:47     ` Dan Scally
2020-09-17 10:15     ` Dan Carpenter
2020-09-17 10:15       ` Dan Carpenter
2020-09-17 10:24       ` Dan Scally
2020-09-17 10:24         ` Dan Scally
2020-09-17 13:28     ` Kieran Bingham
2020-09-17 13:28       ` Kieran Bingham
2020-09-17 14:08       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-09-17 14:08         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-09-17 14:19         ` Kieran Bingham
2020-09-17 14:19           ` Kieran Bingham
2020-09-17 14:36           ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-09-17 14:36             ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-09-17  9:34 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-09-17  9:34   ` Dan Carpenter
2020-09-17 10:19   ` Joe Perches
2020-09-17 10:19     ` Joe Perches
2020-09-18 22:50   ` Dan Scally
2020-09-18 22:50     ` Dan Scally
2020-09-17 10:33 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-09-17 10:33   ` Sakari Ailus
2020-09-17 10:49   ` Dan Carpenter
2020-09-17 10:49     ` Dan Carpenter
2020-09-17 12:25     ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2020-09-17 12:25       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-09-17 13:15       ` Dan Carpenter
2020-09-17 13:15         ` Dan Carpenter
2020-09-18  6:40     ` Sakari Ailus
2020-09-18  6:40       ` Sakari Ailus
2020-09-18  8:16       ` Dan Carpenter
2020-09-18  8:16         ` Dan Carpenter
2020-09-17 10:52   ` Dan Scally
2020-09-17 10:52     ` Dan Scally
2020-09-17 12:45     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-09-17 12:45       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-09-17 13:36       ` Dan Scally
2020-09-17 13:36         ` Dan Scally
2020-09-17 14:14         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-09-17 14:14           ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-09-17 21:25           ` Daniel Scally
2020-09-17 21:25             ` Daniel Scally
2020-09-17 14:44         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-09-17 14:44           ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-09-18  7:51       ` Sakari Ailus
2020-09-18  7:51         ` Sakari Ailus
2020-09-18 13:07         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-09-18 13:07           ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-09-21 13:33           ` Dan Scally
2020-09-21 13:33             ` Dan Scally
2020-09-21 14:33             ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-09-21 14:33               ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-09-23  9:39   ` Dan Scally
2020-09-23  9:39     ` Dan Scally
2020-09-28 11:37   ` Dan Scally
2020-09-28 11:37     ` Dan Scally
2020-09-18  8:03 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-09-18  8:03   ` Dan Carpenter
2020-09-18  8:09   ` Dan Scally
2020-09-18  8:09     ` Dan Scally
2020-09-20 21:34 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-20 21:34 ` [RFC PATCH] cio2_sync_state() can be static kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200917122529.GJ3956970@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bingbu.cao@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jorhand@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=kitakar@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tian.shu.qiu@intel.com \
    --cc=yong.zhi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.