From: Dan Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, robh@kernel.org, jorhand@linux.microsoft.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kitakar@gmail.com, sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, bingbu.cao@intel.com, mchehab@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, tian.shu.qiu@intel.com, yong.zhi@intel.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Add bridge driver to connect sensors to CIO2 device via software nodes on ACPI platforms Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:24:01 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <36d3322a-3128-83b8-bd14-72da34b71e7c@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200917101538.GO4282@kadam> On 17/09/2020 11:15, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:47:50AM +0100, Dan Scally wrote: >> Hi Greg - thanks for the comments, appreciate it (sorry there's so many, >> I'm new to both C and kernel work) > It's pretty impressive work if you're new to C... Thanks (and for your other reply too, haven't had time to go through it in depth yet). I've been using python for a while, but this is my first attempt at anything serious with C. >>>> + return; >>> No error value? >> The prototype for sync_state callbacks is to return void, so my >> understanding is it can't return an error value. I guess a better thing >> to do might be call another function performing cleanup and unloading >> the driver before the return or something along those lines though. > Yeah. I suspect you should be using a different callback instead of > ->sync_state() but I don't know what... :/ Yeah, this is why I wanted to submit it now really; I too suspect I should really be using a different callback but I couldn't find a better option. > regards, > dan carpenter >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, robh@kernel.org, mchehab@kernel.org, jorhand@linux.microsoft.com, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yong.zhi@intel.com, sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, bingbu.cao@intel.com, kitakar@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, tian.shu.qiu@intel.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Add bridge driver to connect sensors to CIO2 device via software nodes on ACPI platforms Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:24:01 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <36d3322a-3128-83b8-bd14-72da34b71e7c@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200917101538.GO4282@kadam> On 17/09/2020 11:15, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:47:50AM +0100, Dan Scally wrote: >> Hi Greg - thanks for the comments, appreciate it (sorry there's so many, >> I'm new to both C and kernel work) > It's pretty impressive work if you're new to C... Thanks (and for your other reply too, haven't had time to go through it in depth yet). I've been using python for a while, but this is my first attempt at anything serious with C. >>>> + return; >>> No error value? >> The prototype for sync_state callbacks is to return void, so my >> understanding is it can't return an error value. I guess a better thing >> to do might be call another function performing cleanup and unloading >> the driver before the return or something along those lines though. > Yeah. I suspect you should be using a different callback instead of > ->sync_state() but I don't know what... :/ Yeah, this is why I wanted to submit it now really; I too suspect I should really be using a different callback but I couldn't find a better option. > regards, > dan carpenter > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-17 10:25 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-09-16 21:36 [RFC PATCH] Add bridge driver to connect sensors to CIO2 device via software nodes on ACPI platforms Daniel Scally 2020-09-16 21:36 ` Daniel Scally 2020-09-17 0:17 ` kernel test robot 2020-09-17 3:02 ` kernel test robot 2020-09-17 7:53 ` Greg KH 2020-09-17 7:53 ` Greg KH 2020-09-17 9:47 ` Dan Scally 2020-09-17 9:47 ` Dan Scally 2020-09-17 10:15 ` Dan Carpenter 2020-09-17 10:15 ` Dan Carpenter 2020-09-17 10:24 ` Dan Scally [this message] 2020-09-17 10:24 ` Dan Scally 2020-09-17 13:28 ` Kieran Bingham 2020-09-17 13:28 ` Kieran Bingham 2020-09-17 14:08 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-09-17 14:08 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-09-17 14:19 ` Kieran Bingham 2020-09-17 14:19 ` Kieran Bingham 2020-09-17 14:36 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-09-17 14:36 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-09-17 9:34 ` Dan Carpenter 2020-09-17 9:34 ` Dan Carpenter 2020-09-17 10:19 ` Joe Perches 2020-09-17 10:19 ` Joe Perches 2020-09-18 22:50 ` Dan Scally 2020-09-18 22:50 ` Dan Scally 2020-09-17 10:33 ` Sakari Ailus 2020-09-17 10:33 ` Sakari Ailus 2020-09-17 10:49 ` Dan Carpenter 2020-09-17 10:49 ` Dan Carpenter 2020-09-17 12:25 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-09-17 12:25 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-09-17 13:15 ` Dan Carpenter 2020-09-17 13:15 ` Dan Carpenter 2020-09-18 6:40 ` Sakari Ailus 2020-09-18 6:40 ` Sakari Ailus 2020-09-18 8:16 ` Dan Carpenter 2020-09-18 8:16 ` Dan Carpenter 2020-09-17 10:52 ` Dan Scally 2020-09-17 10:52 ` Dan Scally 2020-09-17 12:45 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-09-17 12:45 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-09-17 13:36 ` Dan Scally 2020-09-17 13:36 ` Dan Scally 2020-09-17 14:14 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-09-17 14:14 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-09-17 21:25 ` Daniel Scally 2020-09-17 21:25 ` Daniel Scally 2020-09-17 14:44 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-09-17 14:44 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-09-18 7:51 ` Sakari Ailus 2020-09-18 7:51 ` Sakari Ailus 2020-09-18 13:07 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-09-18 13:07 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-09-21 13:33 ` Dan Scally 2020-09-21 13:33 ` Dan Scally 2020-09-21 14:33 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-09-21 14:33 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-09-23 9:39 ` Dan Scally 2020-09-23 9:39 ` Dan Scally 2020-09-28 11:37 ` Dan Scally 2020-09-28 11:37 ` Dan Scally 2020-09-18 8:03 ` Dan Carpenter 2020-09-18 8:03 ` Dan Carpenter 2020-09-18 8:09 ` Dan Scally 2020-09-18 8:09 ` Dan Scally 2020-09-20 21:34 ` kernel test robot 2020-09-20 21:34 ` [RFC PATCH] cio2_sync_state() can be static kernel test robot
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=36d3322a-3128-83b8-bd14-72da34b71e7c@gmail.com \ --to=djrscally@gmail.com \ --cc=bingbu.cao@intel.com \ --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=jorhand@linux.microsoft.com \ --cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \ --cc=kitakar@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \ --cc=robh@kernel.org \ --cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \ --cc=tian.shu.qiu@intel.com \ --cc=yong.zhi@intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.