All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/25] hw/cxl/device: Introduce a CXL device (8.2.8)
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:07:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201116130756.000002a0@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201111054724.794888-5-ben.widawsky@intel.com>

On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 21:47:03 -0800
Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:

> A CXL device is a type of CXL component. Conceptually, a CXL device
> would be a leaf node in a CXL topology. From an emulation perspective,
> CXL devices are the most complex and so the actual implementation is
> reserved for discrete commits.
> 
> This new device type is specifically catered towards the eventually
> implementation of a Type3 CXL.mem device, 8.2.8.5 in the CXL 2.0
> specification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>

As an RFC, would be good to have questions relavant to individual
patches if possible.  Makes it easier to know what you want feedback on.

The REG32 being used for 64 bit registers seems awkward. I'd suggest
we either break them up into DW and deal with the edge parts manually.

I'm not sure a REG64 definition would work due to lack of explicit alignment
guarantees.  Might be fine though.

One buglet inline and a few other comments.

Jonathan


> ---
>  include/hw/cxl/cxl.h        |   1 +
>  include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h | 193 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 194 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> 
> diff --git a/include/hw/cxl/cxl.h b/include/hw/cxl/cxl.h
> index 55f6cc30a5..23f52c4cf9 100644
> --- a/include/hw/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/include/hw/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>  
>  #include "cxl_pci.h"
>  #include "cxl_component.h"
> +#include "cxl_device.h"
>  
>  #endif
>  
> diff --git a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..491eca6e05
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
> +/*
> + * QEMU CXL Devices
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2020 Intel
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2. See the
> + * COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef CXL_DEVICE_H
> +#define CXL_DEVICE_H
> +
> +#include "hw/register.h"
> +
> +/*
> + * The following is how a CXL device's MMIO space is laid out. The only
> + * requirement from the spec is that the capabilities array and the capability
> + * headers start at offset 0 and are contiguously packed. The headers themselves
> + * provide offsets to the register fields. For this emulation, registers will
> + * start at offset 0x80 (m == 0x80). No secondary mailbox is implemented which
> + * means that n = m + sizeof(mailbox registers) + sizeof(device registers).
> + *
> + * This is roughly described in 8.2.8 Figure 138 of the CXL 2.0 spec.
> + *
> + * n + PAYLOAD_SIZE_MAX  +---------------------------------+
> + *                       |                                 |
> + *                  ^    |                                 |
> + *                  |    |                                 |
> + *                  |    |                                 |
> + *                  |    |                                 |
> + *                  |    |         Command Payload         |
> + *                  |    |                                 |
> + *                  |    |                                 |
> + *                  |    |                                 |
> + *                  |    |                                 |
> + *                  |    |                                 |
> + *                  n    +---------------------------------+
> + *                  ^    |                                 |
> + *                  |    |    Device Capability Registers  |
> + *                  |    |    x, mailbox, y                |
> + *                  |    |                                 |
> + *                  m    +---------------------------------+
> + *                  ^    |     Device Capability Header y  |
> + *                  |    +---------------------------------+
> + *                  |    | Device Capability Header Mailbox|
> + *                  |    +------------- --------------------
> + *                  |    |     Device Capability Header x  |
> + *                  |    +---------------------------------+
> + *                  |    |                                 |
> + *                  |    |                                 |
> + *                  |    |      Device Cap Array[0..n]     |
> + *                  |    |                                 |
> + *                  |    |                                 |
> + *                  |    |                                 |
> + *                  0    +---------------------------------+
> + */
> +
> +#define CXL_DEVICE_CAP_HDR1_OFFSET 0x10 /* Figure 138 */
> +#define CXL_DEVICE_CAP_REG_SIZE 0x10 /* 8.2.8.2 */
> +
> +#define CXL_DEVICE_REGISTERS_OFFSET 0x80 /* Read comment above */
> +#define CXL_DEVICE_REGISTERS_LENGTH 0x8 /* 8.2.8.3.1 */
> +
> +#define CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_OFFSET \
> +    (CXL_DEVICE_REGISTERS_OFFSET + CXL_DEVICE_REGISTERS_LENGTH)
> +#define CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_SIZE 0x20
> +#define CXL_MAILBOX_PAYLOAD_SHIFT 11
> +#define CXL_MAILBOX_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE (1 << CXL_MAILBOX_PAYLOAD_SHIFT)
> +#define CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_LENGTH \
> +    (CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_SIZE + CXL_MAILBOX_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE)
> +
> +typedef struct cxl_device_state {
> +    /* Boss container and caps registers */
> +    MemoryRegion device_registers;
> +
> +    MemoryRegion caps;
> +    MemoryRegion device;
> +    MemoryRegion mailbox;
> +
> +    MemoryRegion *pmem;
> +    MemoryRegion *vmem;
> +
> +    bool active;
> +    uint16_t command;
> +    uint16_t payload_size;
> +    union {
> +        uint8_t caps_reg_state[CXL_DEVICE_CAP_REG_SIZE * 4]; /* ARRAY + 3 CAPS */
> +        uint32_t caps_reg_state32[0];
> +    };
> +} CXLDeviceState;
> +
> +/* Initialize the register block for a device */
> +void cxl_device_register_block_init(Object *obj, CXLDeviceState *dev);
> +
> +/* Set up default values for the register block */
> +void cxl_device_register_init_common(CXLDeviceState *dev);
> +
> +/* CXL 2.0 - 8.2.8.1 */
> +REG32(CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, 0) /* 48b!?!?! */
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_ID, 0, 16)
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_VERSION, 16, 8)
> +REG32(CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY2, 4) /* We're going to pretend it's 64b */

Fair call.  Guess reserved 16 bits on the end will be the eventual fix.

> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY2, CAP_COUNT, 0, 16)
> +
> +/*
> + * In the 8.2.8.2, this is listed as a 128b register, but in 8.2.8, it says:
> + * > No registers defined in Section 8.2.8 are larger than 64-bits wide so that
> + * > is the maximum access size allowed for these registers. If this rule is not
> + * > followed, the behavior is undefined
> + *
> + * Here we've chosen to make it 4 dwords. The spec allows any pow2 multiple
> + * access to be used for a register (2 qwords, 8 words, 128 bytes).
> + *
> + * XXX: This is supposedly fixed for the release version of the spec. If this
> + * comment is still here, I've failed.

*sniggers in a sympathetic way*

> + */
> +#define CXL_DEVICE_CAPABILITY_HEADER_REGISTER(n, offset)                            \
> +    REG32(CXL_DEV_##n##_CAP_HDR0, offset)                 \
> +        FIELD(CXL_DEV_##n##_CAP_HDR0, CAP_ID, 0, 16)      \
> +        FIELD(CXL_DEV_##n##_CAP_HDR0, CAP_VERSION, 16, 8) \
> +    REG32(CXL_DEV_##n##_CAP_HDR1, offset + 4)             \
> +        FIELD(CXL_DEV_##n##_CAP_HDR1, CAP_OFFSET, 0, 32)  \
> +    REG32(CXL_DEV_##n##_CAP_HDR2, offset + 8)             \
> +        FIELD(CXL_DEV_##n##_CAP_HDR2, CAP_LENGTH, 0, 32)
> +
> +CXL_DEVICE_CAPABILITY_HEADER_REGISTER(DEVICE, CXL_DEVICE_CAP_HDR1_OFFSET)
> +CXL_DEVICE_CAPABILITY_HEADER_REGISTER(MAILBOX, CXL_DEVICE_CAP_HDR1_OFFSET + \
> +                                               CXL_DEVICE_CAP_REG_SIZE)
> +
> +REG32(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CAP, 0)
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CAP, PAYLOAD_SIZE, 0, 5)
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CAP, INT_CAP, 5, 1)
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CAP, BG_INT_CAP, 6, 1)
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CAP, MSI_N, 7, 4)
> +
> +REG32(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CTRL, 4)
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CTRL, DOORBELL, 0, 1)
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CTRL, INT_EN, 1, 2)

1 bit field, not 2.

> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CTRL, BG_INT_EN, 2, 1)
> +
> +enum {
> +    CXL_CMD_EVENTS              = 0x1,

> +    CXL_CMD_IDENTIFY            = 0x40,
> +};
> +
> +REG32(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, 8)
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, OP, 0, 16)
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, LENGTH, 16, 20)

That takes us out to bit 36 in a 32 bit register?
Probably needs a comment like the ones below.
Wouldn't want to miss fixing this one later.

> +
> +/* 8.2.8.4.5.1 Command Return Codes */
> +enum {
> +    RET_SUCCESS                 = 0x0,
> +    RET_BG_STARTED              = 0x1, /* Background Command Started */
> +    RET_EINVAL                  = 0x2, /* Invalid Input */
> +    RET_ENOTSUP                 = 0x3, /* Unsupported */
> +    RET_ENODEV                  = 0x4, /* Internal Error */

Mapping that to NODEV seems less than obvious.

> +    RET_ERESTART                = 0x5, /* Retry Required */
> +    RET_EBUSY                   = 0x6, /* Busy */
> +    RET_MEDIA_DISABLED          = 0x7, /* Media Disabled */
> +    RET_FW_EBUSY                = 0x8, /* FW Transfer in Progress */
> +    RET_FW_OOO                  = 0x9, /* FW Transfer Out of Order */
> +    RET_FW_AUTH                 = 0xa, /* FW Authentication Failed */
> +    RET_FW_EBADSLT              = 0xb, /* Invalid Slot */
> +    RET_FW_ROLLBACK             = 0xc, /* Activation Failed, FW Rolled Back */
> +    RET_FW_REBOOT               = 0xd, /* Activation Failed, Cold Reset Required */
> +    RET_ENOENT                  = 0xe, /* Invalid Handle */
> +    RET_EFAULT                  = 0xf, /* Invalid Physical Address */
> +    RET_POISON_E2BIG            = 0x10, /* Inject Poison Limit Reached */
> +    RET_EIO                     = 0x11, /* Permanent Media Failure */
> +    RET_ECANCELED               = 0x12, /* Aborted */
> +    RET_EACCESS                 = 0x13, /* Invalid Security State */
> +    RET_EPERM                   = 0x14, /* Incorrect Passphrase */
> +    RET_EPROTONOSUPPORT         = 0x15, /* Unsupported Mailbox */
> +    RET_EMSGSIZE                = 0x16, /* Invalid Payload Length */
> +    RET_MAX                     = 0x17
> +};
> +
> +/* XXX: actually a 64b register */
> +REG32(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_STS, 0x10)
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_STS, BG_OP, 0, 1)
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_STS, ERRNO, 32, 16)
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_STS, VENDOR_ERRNO, 48, 16)
> +
> +/* XXX: actually a 64b register */
> +REG32(CXL_DEV_BG_CMD_STS, 0x18)
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_BG_CMD_STS, BG, 0, 16)
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_BG_CMD_STS, DONE, 16, 7)
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_BG_CMD_STS, ERRNO, 32, 16)
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_BG_CMD_STS, VENDOR_ERRNO, 48, 16)
> +
> +REG32(CXL_DEV_CMD_PAYLOAD, 0x20)
> +
> +#endif



  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-16 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-11  5:46 [RFC PATCH 00/25] Introduce CXL 2.0 Emulation Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 01/25] Temp: Add the PCI_EXT_ID_DVSEC definition to the qemu pci_regs.h copy Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 02/25] hw/pci/cxl: Add a CXL component type (interface) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 03/25] hw/cxl/component: Introduce CXL components (8.1.x, 8.2.5) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 12:03   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 19:19     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 12:29       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-24 23:09         ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 04/25] hw/cxl/device: Introduce a CXL device (8.2.8) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 13:07   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2020-11-16 21:11     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 14:21       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 05/25] hw/cxl/device: Implement the CAP array (8.2.8.1-2) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 13:11   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 18:08     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 06/25] hw/cxl/device: Add device status (8.2.8.3) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 13:16   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 21:18     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 14:24       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 07/25] hw/cxl/device: Implement basic mailbox (8.2.8.4) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 13:46   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 21:42     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 08/25] hw/cxl/device: Add memory devices (8.2.8.5) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 16:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 21:45     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 14:31       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 09/25] hw/pxb: Use a type for realizing expanders Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 10/25] hw/pci/cxl: Create a CXL bus type Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 11/25] hw/pxb: Allow creation of a CXL PXB (host bridge) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 16:44   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 22:01     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 14:33       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 12/25] acpi/pci: Consolidate host bridge setup Ben Widawsky
2020-11-12 17:46   ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 16:45   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 13/25] hw/pci: Plumb _UID through host bridges Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 14/25] hw/cxl/component: Implement host bridge MMIO (8.2.5, table 142) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 15/25] acpi/pxb/cxl: Reserve host bridge MMIO Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 16:54   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 16/25] hw/pxb/cxl: Add "windows" for host bridges Ben Widawsky
2020-11-13  0:49   ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-23 19:12     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 17/25] hw/cxl/rp: Add a root port Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 18/25] hw/cxl/device: Add a memory device (8.2.8.5) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-12 18:37   ` Eric Blake
2020-11-13  7:47     ` Markus Armbruster
2020-11-25 16:53       ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-26  6:36         ` Markus Armbruster
2020-11-30 17:07           ` Ben Widawsky
2020-12-01 17:06             ` Markus Armbruster
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 19/25] hw/cxl/device: Implement MMIO HDM decoding (8.2.5.12) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 20/25] acpi/cxl: Add _OSC implementation (9.14.2) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 21/25] acpi/cxl: Introduce a compat-driver UUID for CXL _OSC Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 22/25] acpi/cxl: Create the CEDT (9.14.1) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 17:15   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 22:05     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 23/25] Temp: acpi/cxl: Add ACPI0017 (CEDT awareness) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 24/25] WIP: i386/cxl: Initialize a host bridge Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 25/25] qtest/cxl: Add very basic sanity tests Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 17:21 ` [RFC PATCH 00/25] Introduce CXL 2.0 Emulation Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 18:06   ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 14:09     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-25 18:29       ` Ben Widawsky
2020-12-04 14:27 ` Daniel P. Berrangé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201116130756.000002a0@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.