All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 11/25] hw/pxb: Allow creation of a CXL PXB (host bridge)
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:33:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201117143334.00001aa3@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201116220140.axtjp2q6267ne43q@intel.com>

On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 14:01:40 -0800
Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:

> On 20-11-16 16:44:09, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 21:47:10 -0800
> > Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > This works like adding a typical pxb device, except the name is
> > > 'pxb-cxl' instead of 'pxb-pcie'. An example command line would be as
> > > follows:
> > >   -device pxb-cxl,id=cxl.0,bus="pcie.0",bus_nr=1
> > > 
> > > A CXL PXB is backward compatible with PCIe. What this means in practice
> > > is that an operating system that is unaware of CXL should still be able
> > > to enumerate this topology as if it were PCIe.
> > > 
> > > One can create multiple CXL PXB host bridges, but a host bridge can only
> > > be connected to the main root bus. Host bridges cannot appear elsewhere
> > > in the topology.
> > > 
> > > Note that as of this patch, the ACPI tables needed for the host bridge
> > > (specifically, an ACPI object in _SB named ACPI0016 and the CEDT) aren't
> > > created. So while this patch internally creates it, it cannot be
> > > properly used by an operating system or other system software.
> > > 
> > > Upcoming patches will allow creating multiple host bridges.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>  
> > Hi Ben,
> > 
> > Few minor things inline.
> > 
> > Jonathan
> >   
> > > ---
> > >  hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  hw/pci/pci.c                        |  7 +++
> > >  include/hw/pci/pci.h                |  6 +++
> > >  3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
> > > index 88c45dc3b5..3a8d815231 100644
> > > --- a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
> > > +++ b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
> > > @@ -56,6 +56,10 @@ DECLARE_INSTANCE_CHECKER(PXBDev, PXB_DEV,
> > >  DECLARE_INSTANCE_CHECKER(PXBDev, PXB_PCIE_DEV,
> > >                           TYPE_PXB_PCIE_DEVICE)
> > >  
> > > +#define TYPE_PXB_CXL_DEVICE "pxb-cxl"
> > > +DECLARE_INSTANCE_CHECKER(PXBDev, PXB_CXL_DEV,
> > > +                         TYPE_PXB_CXL_DEVICE)
> > > +
> > >  struct PXBDev {
> > >      /*< private >*/
> > >      PCIDevice parent_obj;
> > > @@ -67,6 +71,11 @@ struct PXBDev {
> > >  
> > >  static PXBDev *convert_to_pxb(PCIDevice *dev)
> > >  {
> > > +    /* A CXL PXB's parent bus is PCIe, so the normal check won't work */
> > > +    if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_PXB_CXL_DEVICE)) {
> > > +        return PXB_CXL_DEV(dev);
> > > +    }
> > > +
> > >      return pci_bus_is_express(pci_get_bus(dev))
> > >          ? PXB_PCIE_DEV(dev) : PXB_DEV(dev);
> > >  }
> > > @@ -111,11 +120,20 @@ static const TypeInfo pxb_pcie_bus_info = {
> > >      .class_init    = pxb_bus_class_init,
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > +static const TypeInfo pxb_cxl_bus_info = {
> > > +    .name          = TYPE_PXB_CXL_BUS,
> > > +    .parent        = TYPE_CXL_BUS,
> > > +    .instance_size = sizeof(PXBBus),
> > > +    .class_init    = pxb_bus_class_init,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > >  static const char *pxb_host_root_bus_path(PCIHostState *host_bridge,
> > >                                            PCIBus *rootbus)
> > >  {
> > > -    PXBBus *bus = pci_bus_is_express(rootbus) ?
> > > -                  PXB_PCIE_BUS(rootbus) : PXB_BUS(rootbus);
> > > +    PXBBus *bus = pci_bus_is_cxl(rootbus) ?
> > > +                      PXB_CXL_BUS(rootbus) :
> > > +                      pci_bus_is_express(rootbus) ? PXB_PCIE_BUS(rootbus) :
> > > +                                                    PXB_BUS(rootbus);  
> > 
> > There comes a point where if / else is much more readable.
> >   
> > >  
> > >      snprintf(bus->bus_path, 8, "0000:%02x", pxb_bus_num(rootbus));
> > >      return bus->bus_path;
> > > @@ -380,13 +398,58 @@ static const TypeInfo pxb_pcie_dev_info = {
> > >      },
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > +static void pxb_cxl_dev_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error **errp)
> > > +{
> > > +    /* A CXL PXB's parent bus is still PCIe */
> > > +    if (!pci_bus_is_express(pci_get_bus(dev))) {
> > > +        error_setg(errp, "pxb-cxl devices cannot reside on a PCI bus");
> > > +        return;
> > > +    }
> > > +
> > > +    pxb_dev_realize_common(dev, CXL, errp);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void pxb_cxl_dev_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> > > +{
> > > +    DeviceClass *dc   = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> > > +    PCIDeviceClass *k = PCI_DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> > > +
> > > +    k->realize             = pxb_cxl_dev_realize;
> > > +    k->exit                = pxb_dev_exitfn;
> > > +    k->vendor_id           = PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL;
> > > +    k->device_id           = 0xabcd;  
> > 
> > Just to check, is that an officially assigned device_id that we will never
> > have a clash with?  Nice ID to get if it is :)  
> 
> No, not the real ID.
> 
> My understanding is that the host bridge won't exist at all in the PCI
> hierarchy. So basically all of these can be undeclared. For testing/development
> purposes I wanted to see this info.
> 
> Awesomely, it appears if I remove vendor, device, class, and subsystem
> everything still works and I do not see a bridge device in lspci. So v2 will
> have this all gone.

Pity - it is always fun to track down the holder of the magic list of
device IDs and try to explain to them why you want one for a device
that doesn't "exist" and isn't visible anyway.

I guess no ID is less confusing :) 

Jonathan

> 
> Thanks.
> 
> > 
> >   
> > > +    k->class_id            = PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST;
> > > +    k->subsystem_vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL;
> > > +
> > > +    dc->desc = "CXL Host Bridge";
> > > +    device_class_set_props(dc, pxb_dev_properties);
> > > +    set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_BRIDGE, dc->categories);
> > > +
> > > +    /* Host bridges aren't hotpluggable. FIXME: spec reference */
> > > +    dc->hotpluggable = false;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static const TypeInfo pxb_cxl_dev_info = {
> > > +    .name          = TYPE_PXB_CXL_DEVICE,
> > > +    .parent        = TYPE_PCI_DEVICE,
> > > +    .instance_size = sizeof(PXBDev),
> > > +    .class_init    = pxb_cxl_dev_class_init,
> > > +    .interfaces =
> > > +        (InterfaceInfo[]){
> > > +            { INTERFACE_CONVENTIONAL_PCI_DEVICE },
> > > +            {},
> > > +        },
> > > +};
> > > +
> > >  static void pxb_register_types(void)
> > >  {
> > >      type_register_static(&pxb_bus_info);
> > >      type_register_static(&pxb_pcie_bus_info);
> > > +    type_register_static(&pxb_cxl_bus_info);
> > >      type_register_static(&pxb_host_info);
> > >      type_register_static(&pxb_dev_info);
> > >      type_register_static(&pxb_pcie_dev_info);
> > > +    type_register_static(&pxb_cxl_dev_info);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  type_init(pxb_register_types)
> > > diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
> > > index db88788c4b..67eed889a4 100644
> > > --- a/hw/pci/pci.c
> > > +++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
> > > @@ -220,6 +220,12 @@ static const TypeInfo pcie_bus_info = {
> > >      .class_init = pcie_bus_class_init,
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > +static const TypeInfo cxl_bus_info = {
> > > +    .name       = TYPE_CXL_BUS,
> > > +    .parent     = TYPE_PCIE_BUS,
> > > +    .class_init = pcie_bus_class_init,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > >  static PCIBus *pci_find_bus_nr(PCIBus *bus, int bus_num);
> > >  static void pci_update_mappings(PCIDevice *d);
> > >  static void pci_irq_handler(void *opaque, int irq_num, int level);
> > > @@ -2847,6 +2853,7 @@ static void pci_register_types(void)
> > >  {
> > >      type_register_static(&pci_bus_info);
> > >      type_register_static(&pcie_bus_info);
> > > +    type_register_static(&cxl_bus_info);
> > >      type_register_static(&conventional_pci_interface_info);
> > >      type_register_static(&cxl_interface_info);
> > >      type_register_static(&pcie_interface_info);
> > > diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci.h b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
> > > index 4e6fd59fdd..52267ff69e 100644
> > > --- a/include/hw/pci/pci.h
> > > +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
> > > @@ -405,6 +405,7 @@ typedef PCIINTxRoute (*pci_route_irq_fn)(void *opaque, int pin);
> > >  #define TYPE_PCI_BUS "PCI"
> > >  OBJECT_DECLARE_TYPE(PCIBus, PCIBusClass, PCI_BUS)
> > >  #define TYPE_PCIE_BUS "PCIE"
> > > +#define TYPE_CXL_BUS "CXL"
> > >  
> > >  bool pci_bus_is_express(PCIBus *bus);
> > >  
> > > @@ -753,6 +754,11 @@ static inline void pci_irq_pulse(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
> > >      pci_irq_deassert(pci_dev);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static inline int pci_is_cxl(const PCIDevice *d)
> > > +{
> > > +    return d->cap_present & QEMU_PCIE_CAP_CXL;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static inline int pci_is_express(const PCIDevice *d)
> > >  {
> > >      return d->cap_present & QEMU_PCI_CAP_EXPRESS;  
> >   



  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-17 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-11  5:46 [RFC PATCH 00/25] Introduce CXL 2.0 Emulation Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 01/25] Temp: Add the PCI_EXT_ID_DVSEC definition to the qemu pci_regs.h copy Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 02/25] hw/pci/cxl: Add a CXL component type (interface) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 03/25] hw/cxl/component: Introduce CXL components (8.1.x, 8.2.5) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 12:03   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 19:19     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 12:29       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-24 23:09         ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 04/25] hw/cxl/device: Introduce a CXL device (8.2.8) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 13:07   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 21:11     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 14:21       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 05/25] hw/cxl/device: Implement the CAP array (8.2.8.1-2) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 13:11   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 18:08     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 06/25] hw/cxl/device: Add device status (8.2.8.3) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 13:16   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 21:18     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 14:24       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 07/25] hw/cxl/device: Implement basic mailbox (8.2.8.4) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 13:46   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 21:42     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 08/25] hw/cxl/device: Add memory devices (8.2.8.5) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 16:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 21:45     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 14:31       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 09/25] hw/pxb: Use a type for realizing expanders Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 10/25] hw/pci/cxl: Create a CXL bus type Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 11/25] hw/pxb: Allow creation of a CXL PXB (host bridge) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 16:44   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 22:01     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 14:33       ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 12/25] acpi/pci: Consolidate host bridge setup Ben Widawsky
2020-11-12 17:46   ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 16:45   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 13/25] hw/pci: Plumb _UID through host bridges Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 14/25] hw/cxl/component: Implement host bridge MMIO (8.2.5, table 142) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 15/25] acpi/pxb/cxl: Reserve host bridge MMIO Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 16:54   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 16/25] hw/pxb/cxl: Add "windows" for host bridges Ben Widawsky
2020-11-13  0:49   ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-23 19:12     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 17/25] hw/cxl/rp: Add a root port Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 18/25] hw/cxl/device: Add a memory device (8.2.8.5) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-12 18:37   ` Eric Blake
2020-11-13  7:47     ` Markus Armbruster
2020-11-25 16:53       ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-26  6:36         ` Markus Armbruster
2020-11-30 17:07           ` Ben Widawsky
2020-12-01 17:06             ` Markus Armbruster
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 19/25] hw/cxl/device: Implement MMIO HDM decoding (8.2.5.12) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 20/25] acpi/cxl: Add _OSC implementation (9.14.2) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 21/25] acpi/cxl: Introduce a compat-driver UUID for CXL _OSC Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 22/25] acpi/cxl: Create the CEDT (9.14.1) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 17:15   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 22:05     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 23/25] Temp: acpi/cxl: Add ACPI0017 (CEDT awareness) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 24/25] WIP: i386/cxl: Initialize a host bridge Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 25/25] qtest/cxl: Add very basic sanity tests Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 17:21 ` [RFC PATCH 00/25] Introduce CXL 2.0 Emulation Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 18:06   ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 14:09     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-25 18:29       ` Ben Widawsky
2020-12-04 14:27 ` Daniel P. Berrangé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201117143334.00001aa3@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.