All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/25] hw/cxl/device: Add memory devices (8.2.8.5)
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:45:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201116214505.baogbkuiggkyrmee@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201116163722.000079f4@Huawei.com>

On 20-11-16 16:37:22, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 21:47:07 -0800
> Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Memory devices implement extra capabilities on top of CXL devices. This
> > adds support for that.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c   | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c  | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h | 15 ++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> > index aec8b0d421..6544a68567 100644
> > --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> > +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> > @@ -158,6 +158,45 @@ static void mailbox_reg_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t value,
> >          process_mailbox(cxl_dstate);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static uint64_t mdev_reg_read(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, unsigned size)
> > +{
> > +    uint64_t retval = 0;
> > +
> > +    retval = FIELD_DP64(retval, CXL_MEM_DEV_STS, MEDIA_STATUS, 1);
> > +    retval = FIELD_DP64(retval, CXL_MEM_DEV_STS, MBOX_READY, 1);
> > +
> > +    switch (size) {
> > +    case 4:
> > +        if (unlikely(offset & (sizeof(uint32_t) - 1))) {
> > +            qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "Unaligned register read\n");
> > +            return 0;
> > +        }
> > +        break;
> > +    case 8:
> > +        if (unlikely(offset & (sizeof(uint64_t) - 1))) {
> > +            qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "Unaligned register read\n");
> > +            return 0;
> > +        }
> > +        break;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    return ldn_le_p(&retval, size);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const MemoryRegionOps mdev_ops = {
> > +    .read = mdev_reg_read,
> > +    .write = NULL,
> > +    .endianness = DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN,
> > +    .valid = {
> > +        .min_access_size = 4,
> > +        .max_access_size = 8,
> > +    },
> > +    .impl = {
> > +        .min_access_size = 4,
> > +        .max_access_size = 8,
> > +    },
> > +};
> > +
> >  static const MemoryRegionOps mailbox_ops = {
> >      .read = mailbox_reg_read,
> >      .write = mailbox_reg_write,
> > @@ -213,6 +252,9 @@ void cxl_device_register_block_init(Object *obj, CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> >                            "device-status", CXL_DEVICE_REGISTERS_LENGTH);
> >      memory_region_init_io(&cxl_dstate->mailbox, obj, &mailbox_ops, cxl_dstate,
> >                            "mailbox", CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_LENGTH);
> > +    memory_region_init_io(&cxl_dstate->memory_device, obj, &mdev_ops,
> > +                          cxl_dstate, "memory device caps",
> > +                          CXL_MEMORY_DEVICE_REGISTERS_LENGTH);
> >  
> >      memory_region_add_subregion(&cxl_dstate->device_registers, 0,
> >                                  &cxl_dstate->caps);
> > @@ -221,6 +263,9 @@ void cxl_device_register_block_init(Object *obj, CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> >                                  &cxl_dstate->device);
> >      memory_region_add_subregion(&cxl_dstate->device_registers,
> >                                  CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_OFFSET, &cxl_dstate->mailbox);
> > +    memory_region_add_subregion(&cxl_dstate->device_registers,
> > +                                CXL_MEMORY_DEVICE_REGISTERS_OFFSET,
> > +                                &cxl_dstate->memory_device);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void mailbox_init_common(uint32_t *mbox_regs)
> > @@ -233,7 +278,7 @@ static void mailbox_init_common(uint32_t *mbox_regs)
> >  void cxl_device_register_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> >  {
> >      uint32_t *cap_hdrs = cxl_dstate->caps_reg_state32;
> > -    const int cap_count = 1;
> 
> Guessing this should previously have been 2?
> 
> > +    const int cap_count = 3;
> >  
> >      /* CXL Device Capabilities Array Register */
> >      ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_ID, 0);
> > @@ -242,6 +287,7 @@ void cxl_device_register_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> >  
> >      cxl_device_cap_init(cxl_dstate, DEVICE, 1);
> >      cxl_device_cap_init(cxl_dstate, MAILBOX, 2);
> > +    cxl_device_cap_init(cxl_dstate, MEMORY_DEVICE, 0x4000);
> >  
> >      mailbox_init_common(cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state32);
> >  }
> > diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> > index 2d1b0ef9e4..5d2579800e 100644
> > --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> > +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> > @@ -12,6 +12,12 @@
> >  #include "hw/pci/pci.h"
> >  #include "hw/cxl/cxl.h"
> >  
> > +enum cxl_opcode {
> > +    CXL_EVENTS      = 0x1,
> > +    CXL_IDENTIFY    = 0x40,
> > +        #define CXL_IDENTIFY_MEMORY_DEVICE = 0x0
> > +};
> > +
> >  /* 8.2.8.4.5.1 Command Return Codes */
> >  enum {
> >      RET_SUCCESS                 = 0x0,
> > @@ -40,6 +46,43 @@ enum {
> >      RET_MAX                     = 0x17
> >  };
> >  
> > +/* 8.2.9.5.1.1 */
> > +static int cmd_set_identify(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate, uint8_t cmd,
> > +                            uint32_t *ret_size)
> 
> I'm a bit confused on naming here, perhaps rsp_set_identity makes
> it clearer which direction this is going in?  I think this is
> filling in the reply for a command from software running on the
> system. Naming seems to me to suggest we are setting the identity
> of the hardware.  
> 

It sounds like maybe you read "identify" as "identity"?

You're correct, this represents the firmware running on the memory device that
is receiving the identify command from the host. I've been thinking about
renaming these based on what the underlying device is. For instance, this might
become:

mem_dev_identify()

> > +{
> > +    struct identify {
> > +        char fw_revision[0x10];
> > +        uint64_t total_capacity;
> > +        uint64_t volatile_capacity;
> > +        uint64_t persistent_capacity;
> > +        uint64_t partition_align;
> > +        uint16_t info_event_log_size;
> > +        uint16_t warning_event_log_size;
> > +        uint16_t failure_event_log_size;
> > +        uint16_t fatal_event_log_size;
> > +        uint32_t lsa_size;
> > +        uint8_t poison_list_max_mer[3];
> > +        uint16_t inject_poison_limit;
> > +        uint8_t poison_caps;
> > +        uint8_t qos_telemetry_caps;
> > +    } __attribute__((packed)) *id;
> > +    _Static_assert(sizeof(struct identify) == 0x43, "Bad identify size");
> > +
> > +    if (memory_region_size(cxl_dstate->pmem) < (256 << 20)) {
> > +        return RET_ENODEV;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    /* PMEM only */
> > +    id = (struct identify *)((void *)cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state +
> > +                             A_CXL_DEV_CMD_PAYLOAD);
> > +    snprintf(id->fw_revision, 0x10, "BWFW VERSION %02d", 0);
> > +    id->total_capacity = memory_region_size(cxl_dstate->pmem);
> > +    id->persistent_capacity = memory_region_size(cxl_dstate->pmem);
> > +
> > +    *ret_size = 0x43;
> > +    return RET_SUCCESS;
> > +}
> > +
> >  void process_mailbox(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> >  {
> >      uint16_t ret = RET_SUCCESS;
> > @@ -63,8 +106,11 @@ void process_mailbox(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> >  
> >      uint8_t cmd_set = FIELD_EX64(command_reg, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, COMMAND_SET);
> >      uint8_t cmd = FIELD_EX64(command_reg, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, COMMAND);
> > -    (void)cmd;
> 
> Clean this stuff up before v2.
> 
> >      switch (cmd_set) {
> > +    case CXL_IDENTIFY:
> > +        ret = cmd_set_identify(cxl_dstate, cmd, &ret_len);
> > +        /* Fill in payload here */
> > +        break;
> >      default:
> >          ret = RET_ENOTSUP;
> >      }
> > diff --git a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> > index df00998def..2cb2a9af3c 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> > @@ -69,6 +69,10 @@
> >  #define CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_LENGTH \
> >      (CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_SIZE + CXL_MAILBOX_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE)
> >  
> > +#define CXL_MEMORY_DEVICE_REGISTERS_OFFSET \
> > +    (CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_OFFSET + CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_LENGTH)
> > +#define CXL_MEMORY_DEVICE_REGISTERS_LENGTH 0x8
> > +
> >  typedef struct cxl_device_state {
> >      /* Boss container and caps registers */
> >      MemoryRegion device_registers;
> > @@ -76,6 +80,7 @@ typedef struct cxl_device_state {
> >      MemoryRegion caps;
> >      MemoryRegion device;
> >      MemoryRegion mailbox;
> > +    MemoryRegion memory_device;
> >  
> >      MemoryRegion *pmem;
> >      MemoryRegion *vmem;
> > @@ -131,6 +136,8 @@ REG32(CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY2, 4) /* We're going to pretend it's 64b */
> >  CXL_DEVICE_CAPABILITY_HEADER_REGISTER(DEVICE, CXL_DEVICE_CAP_HDR1_OFFSET)
> >  CXL_DEVICE_CAPABILITY_HEADER_REGISTER(MAILBOX, CXL_DEVICE_CAP_HDR1_OFFSET + \
> >                                                 CXL_DEVICE_CAP_REG_SIZE)
> > +CXL_DEVICE_CAPABILITY_HEADER_REGISTER(MEMORY_DEVICE, CXL_DEVICE_CAP_HDR1_OFFSET + \
> > +                                                     CXL_DEVICE_CAP_REG_SIZE * 2)
> >  
> >  void process_mailbox(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate);
> >  
> > @@ -181,4 +188,12 @@ REG32(CXL_DEV_BG_CMD_STS, 0x18)
> >  
> >  REG32(CXL_DEV_CMD_PAYLOAD, 0x20)
> >  
> > +/* XXX: actually a 64b registers */
> > +REG32(CXL_MEM_DEV_STS, 0)
> > +    FIELD(CXL_MEM_DEV_STS, FATAL, 0, 1)
> > +    FIELD(CXL_MEM_DEV_STS, FW_HALT, 1, 1)
> > +    FIELD(CXL_MEM_DEV_STS, MEDIA_STATUS, 2, 2)
> > +    FIELD(CXL_MEM_DEV_STS, MBOX_READY, 4, 1)
> > +    FIELD(CXL_MEM_DEV_STS, RESET_NEEDED, 5, 3)
> > +
> >  #endif
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-16 21:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-11  5:46 [RFC PATCH 00/25] Introduce CXL 2.0 Emulation Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 01/25] Temp: Add the PCI_EXT_ID_DVSEC definition to the qemu pci_regs.h copy Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 02/25] hw/pci/cxl: Add a CXL component type (interface) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 03/25] hw/cxl/component: Introduce CXL components (8.1.x, 8.2.5) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 12:03   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 19:19     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 12:29       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-24 23:09         ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 04/25] hw/cxl/device: Introduce a CXL device (8.2.8) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 13:07   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 21:11     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 14:21       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 05/25] hw/cxl/device: Implement the CAP array (8.2.8.1-2) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 13:11   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 18:08     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 06/25] hw/cxl/device: Add device status (8.2.8.3) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 13:16   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 21:18     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 14:24       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 07/25] hw/cxl/device: Implement basic mailbox (8.2.8.4) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 13:46   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 21:42     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 08/25] hw/cxl/device: Add memory devices (8.2.8.5) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 16:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 21:45     ` Ben Widawsky [this message]
2020-11-17 14:31       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 09/25] hw/pxb: Use a type for realizing expanders Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 10/25] hw/pci/cxl: Create a CXL bus type Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 11/25] hw/pxb: Allow creation of a CXL PXB (host bridge) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 16:44   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 22:01     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 14:33       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 12/25] acpi/pci: Consolidate host bridge setup Ben Widawsky
2020-11-12 17:46   ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 16:45   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 13/25] hw/pci: Plumb _UID through host bridges Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 14/25] hw/cxl/component: Implement host bridge MMIO (8.2.5, table 142) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 15/25] acpi/pxb/cxl: Reserve host bridge MMIO Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 16:54   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 16/25] hw/pxb/cxl: Add "windows" for host bridges Ben Widawsky
2020-11-13  0:49   ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-23 19:12     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 17/25] hw/cxl/rp: Add a root port Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 18/25] hw/cxl/device: Add a memory device (8.2.8.5) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-12 18:37   ` Eric Blake
2020-11-13  7:47     ` Markus Armbruster
2020-11-25 16:53       ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-26  6:36         ` Markus Armbruster
2020-11-30 17:07           ` Ben Widawsky
2020-12-01 17:06             ` Markus Armbruster
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 19/25] hw/cxl/device: Implement MMIO HDM decoding (8.2.5.12) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 20/25] acpi/cxl: Add _OSC implementation (9.14.2) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 21/25] acpi/cxl: Introduce a compat-driver UUID for CXL _OSC Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 22/25] acpi/cxl: Create the CEDT (9.14.1) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 17:15   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 22:05     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 23/25] Temp: acpi/cxl: Add ACPI0017 (CEDT awareness) Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 24/25] WIP: i386/cxl: Initialize a host bridge Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:47 ` [RFC PATCH 25/25] qtest/cxl: Add very basic sanity tests Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 17:21 ` [RFC PATCH 00/25] Introduce CXL 2.0 Emulation Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 18:06   ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 14:09     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-25 18:29       ` Ben Widawsky
2020-12-04 14:27 ` Daniel P. Berrangé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201116214505.baogbkuiggkyrmee@intel.com \
    --to=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.