All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/8] drm/i915: Treat SAGV block time 0 as SAGV disabled
Date: Wed,  9 Mar 2022 18:49:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220309164948.10671-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220309164948.10671-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

For modern platforms the spec explicitly states that a
SAGV block time of zero means that SAGV is not supported.
Let's extend that to all platforms. Supposedly there should
be no systems where this isn't true, and it'll allow us to:
- use the same code regardless of older vs. newer platform
- wm latencies already treat 0 as disabled, so this fits well
  with other related code
- make it a bit more clear when SAGV is used vs. not
- avoid overflows from adding U32_MAX with a u16 wm0 latency value
  which could cause us to miscalculate the SAGV watermarks on tgl+

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 8ee31c9590a7..40a3094e55ca 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3696,8 +3696,7 @@ skl_setup_sagv_block_time(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		MISSING_CASE(DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv));
 	}
 
-	/* Default to an unusable block time */
-	dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us = -1;
+	dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us = 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -5644,7 +5643,7 @@ static void skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 	result->min_ddb_alloc = max(min_ddb_alloc, blocks) + 1;
 	result->enable = true;
 
-	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 12)
+	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 12 && dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us)
 		result->can_sagv = latency >= dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us;
 }
 
@@ -5677,7 +5676,10 @@ static void tgl_compute_sagv_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
 	struct skl_wm_level *sagv_wm = &plane_wm->sagv.wm0;
 	struct skl_wm_level *levels = plane_wm->wm;
-	unsigned int latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[0] + dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us;
+	unsigned int latency = 0;
+
+	if (dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us)
+		latency = dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us + dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[0];
 
 	skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, plane, 0, latency,
 			     wm_params, &levels[0],
-- 
2.34.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/8] drm/i915: Treat SAGV block time 0 as SAGV disabled
Date: Wed,  9 Mar 2022 18:49:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220309164948.10671-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220309164948.10671-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

For modern platforms the spec explicitly states that a
SAGV block time of zero means that SAGV is not supported.
Let's extend that to all platforms. Supposedly there should
be no systems where this isn't true, and it'll allow us to:
- use the same code regardless of older vs. newer platform
- wm latencies already treat 0 as disabled, so this fits well
  with other related code
- make it a bit more clear when SAGV is used vs. not
- avoid overflows from adding U32_MAX with a u16 wm0 latency value
  which could cause us to miscalculate the SAGV watermarks on tgl+

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 8ee31c9590a7..40a3094e55ca 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3696,8 +3696,7 @@ skl_setup_sagv_block_time(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		MISSING_CASE(DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv));
 	}
 
-	/* Default to an unusable block time */
-	dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us = -1;
+	dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us = 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -5644,7 +5643,7 @@ static void skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 	result->min_ddb_alloc = max(min_ddb_alloc, blocks) + 1;
 	result->enable = true;
 
-	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 12)
+	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 12 && dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us)
 		result->can_sagv = latency >= dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us;
 }
 
@@ -5677,7 +5676,10 @@ static void tgl_compute_sagv_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
 	struct skl_wm_level *sagv_wm = &plane_wm->sagv.wm0;
 	struct skl_wm_level *levels = plane_wm->wm;
-	unsigned int latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[0] + dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us;
+	unsigned int latency = 0;
+
+	if (dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us)
+		latency = dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us + dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[0];
 
 	skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, plane, 0, latency,
 			     wm_params, &levels[0],
-- 
2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-09 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-09 16:49 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/8] drm/i915: SAGV block time fixes Ville Syrjala
2022-03-09 16:49 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2022-03-09 16:49   ` [PATCH v2 1/8] drm/i915: Treat SAGV block time 0 as SAGV disabled Ville Syrjala
2022-03-09 19:29   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-03-09 20:35     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-16 17:55   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-03-09 16:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/8] drm/i915: Rework SAGV block time probing Ville Syrjala
2022-03-16 17:55   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-03-09 16:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/8] drm/i915: Probe whether SAGV works on pre-icl Ville Syrjala
2022-03-16 17:57   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-03-09 16:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/8] drm/i915: Reject excessive SAGV block time Ville Syrjala
2022-03-16 17:58   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-03-09 16:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/8] drm/i915: Rename pre-icl SAGV enable/disable functions Ville Syrjala
2022-03-16 17:57   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-03-09 16:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 6/8] drm/i915: Fix PSF GV point mask when SAGV is not possible Ville Syrjala
2022-03-09 16:49   ` Ville Syrjala
2022-03-09 18:59   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-03-09 18:59     ` [Intel-gfx] " Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-03-09 19:08     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-09 19:08       ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-09 19:34       ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-03-09 19:34         ` [Intel-gfx] " Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-03-09 20:21         ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-09 20:21           ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-16 18:01         ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-03-09 16:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 7/8] drm/i915: Unconfuses QGV vs. PSF point masks Ville Syrjala
2022-03-16 17:56   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-03-09 16:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 8/8] drm/i915: Rename QGV request/response bits Ville Syrjala
2022-03-16 17:57   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-03-09 19:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: SAGV block time fixes (rev2) Patchwork
2022-03-09 20:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-10  5:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220309164948.10671-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.