All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hexagon-setup: Combine four seq_printf() calls into one call in show_cpuinfo()
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 20:50:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20c77dde-a1a0-8383-f344-a6f788af68d9@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161021175317.nnb2keq7m3phwgbv@thunk.org>

> When the author of the semantic patch language is telling you to stand down,

The collaboration evolved between Julia and me during the years somehow.
Different software development opinions occur then as usual.
Further opinions from contributors like you can eventually show variations
between disagreement and acceptance.


> and you still want to try to argue for blind application of patches,

I guess that we have got different views about "blind" tries.


> we have a really big problem.

I hope that potential communication difficulties can still be resolved.


> Especially when some of your patches have actually introduced bugs.

I assume that these incidents could be clarified further, couldn't they?

Regards,
Markus

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hexagon-setup: Combine four seq_printf() calls into one call in show_cpuinfo()
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:50:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20c77dde-a1a0-8383-f344-a6f788af68d9@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161021175317.nnb2keq7m3phwgbv@thunk.org>

> When the author of the semantic patch language is telling you to stand down,

The collaboration evolved between Julia and me during the years somehow.
Different software development opinions occur then as usual.
Further opinions from contributors like you can eventually show variations
between disagreement and acceptance.


> and you still want to try to argue for blind application of patches,

I guess that we have got different views about "blind" tries.


> we have a really big problem.

I hope that potential communication difficulties can still be resolved.


> Especially when some of your patches have actually introduced bugs.

I assume that these incidents could be clarified further, couldn't they?

Regards,
Markus

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-21 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-21  6:33 [PATCH] Hexagon-setup: Combine four seq_printf() calls into one call in show_cpuinfo() SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-21  6:33 ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-21  7:20 ` Julia Lawall
2016-10-21  7:20   ` Julia Lawall
2016-10-21  9:00   ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-21  9:00     ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-21 15:46     ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-10-21 15:46       ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-10-21 17:33       ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-21 17:33         ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-21 17:53         ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-10-21 17:53           ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-10-21 18:28           ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-21 18:28             ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-21 18:50           ` SF Markus Elfring [this message]
2016-10-21 18:50             ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-25 21:37             ` Richard Kuo
2016-10-25 21:37               ` Richard Kuo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20c77dde-a1a0-8383-f344-a6f788af68d9@users.sourceforge.net \
    --to=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rkuo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.