[PATCH] ethdev: support PCI domains

[PATCH] ethdev: support PCI domains

[Sinan Kaya]

The current code is enumerating devices based on bus, device and function
pairs. This does not work well for architectures with multiple PCI
segments/domains. Multiple PCI devices will have the same BDF value but
different segment numbers (01:01:01.0 and 02:01:01.0) for instance.

Adding segment numbers to device naming so that we can uniquely identify
devices.

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
 lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
index 0a6e3f1..929240f 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
@@ -226,7 +226,8 @@ rte_eth_dev_create_unique_device_name(char *name, size_t size,
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = snprintf(name, size, "%d:%d.%d",
+	ret = snprintf(name, size, "%d:%d:%d.%d",
+			pci_dev->addr.domain,
 			pci_dev->addr.bus, pci_dev->addr.devid,
 			pci_dev->addr.function);
 	if (ret < 0)
-- 
1.8.2.1

Re: [PATCH] ethdev: support PCI domains

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:34:10 -0400
Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:

> The current code is enumerating devices based on bus, device and function
> pairs. This does not work well for architectures with multiple PCI
> segments/domains. Multiple PCI devices will have the same BDF value but
> different segment numbers (01:01:01.0 and 02:01:01.0) for instance.
> 
> Adding segment numbers to device naming so that we can uniquely identify
> devices.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>

I ran into this yes. There is a small risk of breaking some application that
assumed something about names though.

Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>

Re: [PATCH] ethdev: support PCI domains

[Sinan Kaya]

On 7/22/2016 5:12 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:34:10 -0400
> Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> 
>> The current code is enumerating devices based on bus, device and function
>> pairs. This does not work well for architectures with multiple PCI
>> segments/domains. Multiple PCI devices will have the same BDF value but
>> different segment numbers (01:01:01.0 and 02:01:01.0) for instance.
>>
>> Adding segment numbers to device naming so that we can uniquely identify
>> devices.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> 
> I ran into this yes. There is a small risk of breaking some application that
> assumed something about names though.
> 
> Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> 

Thanks, hopefully the change is minor and can be contained until next release.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Re: [PATCH] ethdev: support PCI domains

[Thomas Monjalon]

2016-07-22 18:56, Sinan Kaya:
> On 7/22/2016 5:12 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:34:10 -0400
> > Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> The current code is enumerating devices based on bus, device and function
> >> pairs. This does not work well for architectures with multiple PCI
> >> segments/domains. Multiple PCI devices will have the same BDF value but
> >> different segment numbers (01:01:01.0 and 02:01:01.0) for instance.
> >>
> >> Adding segment numbers to device naming so that we can uniquely identify
> >> devices.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> > 
> > I ran into this yes. There is a small risk of breaking some application that
> > assumed something about names though.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> > 
> 
> Thanks, hopefully the change is minor and can be contained until next release.

It is part of the EAL rework.
The function has been moved in EAL and includes the PCI domain:
	http://dpdk.org/commit/affe1cdc

Re: [PATCH] ethdev: support PCI domains

[Sinan Kaya]

On 10/4/2016 4:15 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-07-22 18:56, Sinan Kaya:
>> On 7/22/2016 5:12 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:34:10 -0400
>>> Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The current code is enumerating devices based on bus, device and function
>>>> pairs. This does not work well for architectures with multiple PCI
>>>> segments/domains. Multiple PCI devices will have the same BDF value but
>>>> different segment numbers (01:01:01.0 and 02:01:01.0) for instance.
>>>>
>>>> Adding segment numbers to device naming so that we can uniquely identify
>>>> devices.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
>>>
>>> I ran into this yes. There is a small risk of breaking some application that
>>> assumed something about names though.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
>>>
>>
>> Thanks, hopefully the change is minor and can be contained until next release.
> 
> It is part of the EAL rework.
> The function has been moved in EAL and includes the PCI domain:
> 	http://dpdk.org/commit/affe1cdc
> 

Thanks for taking care of it.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.