* 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.34, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.34, please let us know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2010-07-09 79 45 37 2010-06-21 46 37 26 2010-06-09 15 13 10 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 Subject : 2.6.35 regression Submitter : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov@gmail.com> Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old) Message-ID : <loom.20100705T144459-919@post.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16346 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> Date : 2010-07-04 22:04 (5 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTinof0k28rk4rMr66aubxcRL2rFa5ZEArj1lqD3o@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127828107815930&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337 Subject : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP Submitter : Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com> Date : 2010-07-03 22:59 (6 days old) Message-ID : <4C2FC0E3.6050101@gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16334 Subject : reiserfs locking (v2) Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Date : 2010-07-02 9:34 (7 days old) Message-ID : <20100702093451.GA3973@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127806306303590&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16333 Subject : iwl3945: HARDWARE GONE?? Submitter : Priit Laes <plaes@plaes.org> Date : 2010-07-02 16:02 (7 days old) Message-ID : <1278086575.2889.8.camel@chi> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127808659705983&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16332 Subject : Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open) Submitter : werner@guyane.yi.org Date : 2010-07-02 3:34 (7 days old) Message-ID : <1278041650.12788@guyane.yi.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127804167511930&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16330 Subject : Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3? Submitter : Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Date : 2010-07-01 15:44 (8 days old) Message-ID : <201007011744.19564.trenn@suse.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127799907218877&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16329 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3: Load average climbing to 3+ with no apparent reason: CPU 98% idle, with hardly no I/O Submitter : Török Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com> Date : 2010-07-01 7:40 (8 days old) Message-ID : <20100701104022.404410d6@debian> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127797005030536&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16324 Subject : Oops while running fs_racer test on a POWER6 box against latest git Submitter : divya <dipraksh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2010-06-30 11:34 (9 days old) Message-ID : <4C2B28F3.7000006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127789697303061&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16323 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> Date : 2010-07-01 12:21 (8 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTini6hz2LFeZi8CMUmY3xw1MU7NxmyesuxZ4oCdo@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16322 Subject : WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70() Submitter : boris64 <bugzilla.kernel.org@boris64.net> Date : 2010-07-01 13:54 (8 days old) Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312 Subject : WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-28 9:40 (11 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTin24fr5O4_q5Xbo9Y_NKkEmtcp6Hgmr9_4qXaFz@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127771804806465&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop Submitter : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days old) Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr@rogers.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16309 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 oops trying to suspend. Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-27 12:40 (12 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTinUH2p33-AWxOVDrLsNkn9rgEVrlwn5mfK7P8NH@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127764249926781&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307 Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (13 days old) Message-ID : <4C26317A.5070309@postal.uv.es> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16306 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 cifs_show_options Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-26 10:46 (13 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTilhTrEBYZd4HxeXQk8B6-yV8rCJ2C0jXsEREgIR@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127754922110501&w=2 Handled-By : Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16304 Subject : i915 - high number of wakeups Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> Date : 2010-06-27 09:52 (12 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16294 Subject : [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver Submitter : Kees Cook <kees@outflux.net> Date : 2010-06-25 18:20 (14 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/f1befe71fa7a79ab733011b045639d8d809924ad Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16288 Subject : kernel panic with iwlagn for Intel Wifi Link 5100 Submitter : <yanshuang.zheng@intel.com> Date : 2010-06-25 08:14 (14 days old) Handled-By : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16284 Subject : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code Submitter : Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Date : 2010-06-23 12:57 (16 days old) Message-ID : <20100623125740.GA3368@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127729789113432&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265 Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (30 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb@closure.thunk.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16257 Subject : sysfs changes break hwsim and bnep drivers Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Date : 2010-06-20 11:23 (19 days old) References : http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/162754 Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16234 Subject : [2.6.35-rc3] reboot mutex 'bug'... Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-14 15:16 (25 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTimDcTnyEPmt2ZcCM1UWtn4AYKotiqyjobJApkO7@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127652861118933&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16230 Subject : inconsistent IN-HARDIRQ-W -> HARDIRQ-ON-W usage: fasync, 2.6.35-rc3 Submitter : Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Date : 2010-06-13 9:53 (26 days old) Message-ID : <20100613095305.GA13231@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127642282208277&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228 Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) Submitter : Brian Bloniarz <phunge0@hotmail.com> Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (23 days old) Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221 Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-11 20:31 (28 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTim0jVRyqkwlGOcrg_XTvUQwcBYfWJX-aRzkkrLG@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16205 Subject : acpi: freeing invalid memtype bf799000-bf79a000 Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-09 20:09 (30 days old) Message-ID : <20100609200910.GA2876@joi.lan> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611427029914&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127688398513862&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16201 Subject : SIOCGIWFREQ ioctl fails to get frequency info Submitter : nuh <nuh@mailinator.net> Date : 2010-06-14 10:45 (25 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16199 Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-07 18:14 (32 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTin2pPqOUx--9fIX3BH3e-cU6oCRufijcx_4ozx5@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127593447812015&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197 Subject : [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' Submitter : Ryan Wang <openspace.wang@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-07 0:23 (32 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTincwMZPnYW3S4uz4k2GOn52RpgBIBRfzyD010Yo@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127587022219378&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16187 Subject : Carrier detection failed in dhcpcd when link is up Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> Date : 2010-06-12 15:15 (27 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/10708f37ae729baba9b67bd134c3720709d4ae62 Handled-By : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184 Subject : Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule Submitter : Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp@safe.ca> Date : 2010-06-12 04:17 (27 days old) Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173 Subject : After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs. Submitter : David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net> Date : 2010-06-09 23:25 (30 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632 Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145 Subject : Unable to boot unless "notsc" or "clocksource=hpet", or acpi_pad disabling the TSC Submitter : Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Date : 2010-06-07 13:11 (32 days old) Handled-By : Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com> Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (35 days old) Handled-By : Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16310 Subject : arm omap invalid module format Submitter : Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-28 17:30 (11 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/d0679c730395d0bde9a46939e7ba255b4ba7dd7c Handled-By : Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26999 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16278 Subject : lvm snapshot causes deadlock in 2.6.35 Submitter : Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com> Date : 2010-06-23 16:55 (16 days old) Handled-By : Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26933 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16271 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 regression: IBM Maia system is unbootable [ACPI related?] Submitter : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> Date : 2010-06-21 16:03 (18 days old) Message-ID : <1277136189.10998.63.camel@mulgrave.site> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127713622821166&w=2 Handled-By : Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/108497/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16256 Subject : tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34 Submitter : Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Date : 2010-06-20 11:15 (19 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/225a9be24d799aa16d543c31fb09f0c9ed1d9caa Handled-By : Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=tpmdd-devel&m=127609160616162&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16255 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 deadlocks on semaphore operations Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Date : 2010-06-18 14:49 (21 days old) Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.00.1006180940140.11575@router.home> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127687262727707&w=2 Handled-By : Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127731055203402&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16232 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 - WARNING:iwl_set_dynamic_key Submitter : Mario Guenterberg <mario.guenterberg@googlemail.com> Date : 2010-06-14 11:55 (25 days old) Message-ID : <20100614115510.GA7904@guenti-laptop> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127651695627147&w=2 Handled-By : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Patch : http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/52893 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16215 Subject : sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/class/net/bnep0' Submitter : Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> Date : 2010-06-15 14:55 (24 days old) Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16215#c10 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16169 Subject : Complain from preemptive debug Submitter : Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> Date : 2010-05-31 10:10 (39 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTilTnAAZIizKinYsxFkNTkrmPqk6XJJuUjjhJ7EP@mail.gmail.com> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/31/77 Handled-By : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Patch : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01631.html https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/106555/ For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.34, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16055 Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.34, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.34, please let us know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2010-07-09 79 45 37 2010-06-21 46 37 26 2010-06-09 15 13 10 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 Subject : 2.6.35 regression Submitter : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old) Message-ID : <loom.20100705T144459-919-eS7Uydv5nfjZ+VzJOa5vwg@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16346 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-07-04 22:04 (5 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTinof0k28rk4rMr66aubxcRL2rFa5ZEArj1lqD3o-JsoAwUIsXotQFR93xxRIaA@public.gmane.orgcom> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127828107815930&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337 Subject : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP Submitter : Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-07-03 22:59 (6 days old) Message-ID : <4C2FC0E3.6050101-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16334 Subject : reiserfs locking (v2) Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-07-02 9:34 (7 days old) Message-ID : <20100702093451.GA3973-dY8u8AhHFaWtd10JCjopabkcH5ONE+aC@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127806306303590&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16333 Subject : iwl3945: HARDWARE GONE?? Submitter : Priit Laes <plaes-q/aMd4JkU83YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-07-02 16:02 (7 days old) Message-ID : <1278086575.2889.8.camel@chi> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127808659705983&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16332 Subject : Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open) Submitter : werner-K1X7VnsBORrsrOwW+9ziJQ@public.gmane.org Date : 2010-07-02 3:34 (7 days old) Message-ID : <1278041650.12788-K1X7VnsBORrsrOwW+9ziJQ@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127804167511930&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16330 Subject : Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3? Submitter : Thomas Renninger <trenn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-07-01 15:44 (8 days old) Message-ID : <201007011744.19564.trenn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127799907218877&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16329 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3: Load average climbing to 3+ with no apparent reason: CPU 98% idle, with hardly no I/O Submitter : Török Edwin <edwintorok-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-07-01 7:40 (8 days old) Message-ID : <20100701104022.404410d6@debian> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127797005030536&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16324 Subject : Oops while running fs_racer test on a POWER6 box against latest git Submitter : divya <dipraksh-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-30 11:34 (9 days old) Message-ID : <4C2B28F3.7000006-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127789697303061&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16323 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-07-01 12:21 (8 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTini6hz2LFeZi8CMUmY3xw1MU7NxmyesuxZ4oCdo-JsoAwUIsXotQFR93xxRIaA@public.gmane.orgcom> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16322 Subject : WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70() Submitter : boris64 <bugzilla.kernel.org-ro/BP3KN3ujR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-07-01 13:54 (8 days old) Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312 Subject : WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-28 9:40 (11 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTin24fr5O4_q5Xbo9Y_NKkEmtcp6Hgmr9_4qXaFz-JsoAwUIsXotQFR93xxRIaA@public.gmane.orgcom> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127771804806465&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop Submitter : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days old) Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16309 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 oops trying to suspend. Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-27 12:40 (12 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTinUH2p33-AWxOVDrLsNkn9rgEVrlwn5mfK7P8NH-JsoAwUIsXotQFR93xxRIaA@public.gmane.orgcom> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127764249926781&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307 Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (13 days old) Message-ID : <4C26317A.5070309-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16306 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 cifs_show_options Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-26 10:46 (13 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTilhTrEBYZd4HxeXQk8B6-yV8rCJ2C0jXsEREgIR-JsoAwUIsXotQFR93xxRIaA@public.gmane.orgcom> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127754922110501&w=2 Handled-By : Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16304 Subject : i915 - high number of wakeups Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-27 09:52 (12 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16294 Subject : [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver Submitter : Kees Cook <kees-oSa+0FWJbaXR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-25 18:20 (14 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/f1befe71fa7a79ab733011b045639d8d809924ad Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16288 Subject : kernel panic with iwlagn for Intel Wifi Link 5100 Submitter : <yanshuang.zheng-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-25 08:14 (14 days old) Handled-By : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16284 Subject : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code Submitter : Paul Mackerras <paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-23 12:57 (16 days old) Message-ID : <20100623125740.GA3368-oklZEfemRj05kJ7NmlRacFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127729789113432&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265 Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (30 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb-UK71uKi2zisAobODsErMgNi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16257 Subject : sysfs changes break hwsim and bnep drivers Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-20 11:23 (19 days old) References : http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/162754 Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Kay Sievers <kay.sievers-tD+1rO4QERM@public.gmane.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16234 Subject : [2.6.35-rc3] reboot mutex 'bug'... Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-14 15:16 (25 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTimDcTnyEPmt2ZcCM1UWtn4AYKotiqyjobJApkO7-JsoAwUIsXotQFR93xxRIaA@public.gmane.orgcom> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127652861118933&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16230 Subject : inconsistent IN-HARDIRQ-W -> HARDIRQ-ON-W usage: fasync, 2.6.35-rc3 Submitter : Dominik Brodowski <linux-X3ehHDuj6sIIGcDfoQAp7OTW4wlIGRCZ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-13 9:53 (26 days old) Message-ID : <20100613095305.GA13231-S7uyTPAaJ/sb6pqDj42GsMgv3T4z79SOrE5yTffgRl4@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127642282208277&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228 Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) Submitter : Brian Bloniarz <phunge0-PkbjNfxxIARBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (23 days old) Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221 Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-11 20:31 (28 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTim0jVRyqkwlGOcrg_XTvUQwcBYfWJX-aRzkkrLG-JsoAwUIsXotQFR93xxRIaA@public.gmane.orgcom> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16205 Subject : acpi: freeing invalid memtype bf799000-bf79a000 Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-09 20:09 (30 days old) Message-ID : <20100609200910.GA2876-OI9uyE9O0yo@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611427029914&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127688398513862&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16201 Subject : SIOCGIWFREQ ioctl fails to get frequency info Submitter : nuh <nuh-hRtevi7K+EWJQ7yn63+t2w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-14 10:45 (25 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16199 Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-07 18:14 (32 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTin2pPqOUx--9fIX3BH3e-cU6oCRufijcx_4ozx5-JsoAwUIsXotQFR93xxRIaA@public.gmane.orgcom> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127593447812015&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197 Subject : [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' Submitter : Ryan Wang <openspace.wang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-07 0:23 (32 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTincwMZPnYW3S4uz4k2GOn52RpgBIBRfzyD010Yo-JsoAwUIsXotQFR93xxRIaA@public.gmane.orgcom> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127587022219378&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16187 Subject : Carrier detection failed in dhcpcd when link is up Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-12 15:15 (27 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/10708f37ae729baba9b67bd134c3720709d4ae62 Handled-By : Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184 Subject : Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule Submitter : Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp-4qkeo2rQ0gg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-12 04:17 (27 days old) Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <kaber-dcUjhNyLwpNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining-DX+603jRYB8@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399-DqSSrKF0TaySnEC3TeqHn5dqbFPxfnh/@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk-JsoAwUIsXotQFR93xxRIaA@public.gmane.orgcom> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173 Subject : After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs. Submitter : David Hill <hilld-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-09 23:25 (30 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632 Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145 Subject : Unable to boot unless "notsc" or "clocksource=hpet", or acpi_pad disabling the TSC Submitter : Tom Gundersen <teg-B22kvLQNl6c@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-07 13:11 (32 days old) Handled-By : Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (35 days old) Handled-By : Jens Axboe <axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16310 Subject : arm omap invalid module format Submitter : Robert Nelson <robertcnelson-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-28 17:30 (11 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/d0679c730395d0bde9a46939e7ba255b4ba7dd7c Handled-By : Michal Marek <mmarek-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26999 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16278 Subject : lvm snapshot causes deadlock in 2.6.35 Submitter : Phillip Susi <psusi-3tLf1voIkJTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-23 16:55 (16 days old) Handled-By : Eric Sandeen <sandeen-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26933 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16271 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 regression: IBM Maia system is unbootable [ACPI related?] Submitter : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-JuX6DAaQMKPCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-21 16:03 (18 days old) Message-ID : <1277136189.10998.63.camel-0iu6Cu4xQGLYCGPCin2YbQ@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127713622821166&w=2 Handled-By : Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/108497/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16256 Subject : tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34 Submitter : Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-20 11:15 (19 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/225a9be24d799aa16d543c31fb09f0c9ed1d9caa Handled-By : Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=tpmdd-devel&m=127609160616162&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16255 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 deadlocks on semaphore operations Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-18 14:49 (21 days old) Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.00.1006180940140.11575-sBS69tsa9Uj/9pzu0YdTqQ@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127687262727707&w=2 Handled-By : Manfred Spraul <manfred-nhLOkwUX5cPe2c5cEj3t2g@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127731055203402&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16232 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 - WARNING:iwl_set_dynamic_key Submitter : Mario Guenterberg <mario.guenterberg-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-14 11:55 (25 days old) Message-ID : <20100614115510.GA7904@guenti-laptop> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127651695627147&w=2 Handled-By : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/52893 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16215 Subject : sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/class/net/bnep0' Submitter : Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt-NCk8gXQAEuFz6jiHbVrK7g@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-15 14:55 (24 days old) Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16215#c10 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16169 Subject : Complain from preemptive debug Submitter : Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-05-31 10:10 (39 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTilTnAAZIizKinYsxFkNTkrmPqk6XJJuUjjhJ7EP-JsoAwUIsXotQFR93xxRIaA@public.gmane.orgcom> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/31/77 Handled-By : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01631.html https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/106555/ For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.34, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16055 Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jens Axboe, Larry Finger This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (35 days old) Handled-By : Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 @ 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jens Axboe, Larry Finger This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (35 days old) Handled-By : Jens Axboe <axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 1:19 ` Larry Finger -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Larry Finger @ 2010-07-09 1:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jens Axboe On 07/08/2010 06:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 > Submitter : Larry Finger<Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (35 days old) > Handled-By : Jens Axboe<axboe@kernel.dk> This bug is still present in 2.6.35-rc4. Larry ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 @ 2010-07-09 1:19 ` Larry Finger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Larry Finger @ 2010-07-09 1:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jens Axboe On 07/08/2010 06:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 > Submitter : Larry Finger<Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (35 days old) > Handled-By : Jens Axboe<axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> This bug is still present in 2.6.35-rc4. Larry ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 @ 2010-07-09 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Larry Finger Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jens Axboe On Friday, July 09, 2010, Larry Finger wrote: > On 07/08/2010 06:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 > > Submitter : Larry Finger<Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (35 days old) > > Handled-By : Jens Axboe<axboe@kernel.dk> > > This bug is still present in 2.6.35-rc4. Thanks for the update. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 @ 2010-07-09 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Larry Finger Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jens Axboe On Friday, July 09, 2010, Larry Finger wrote: > On 07/08/2010 06:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 > > Submitter : Larry Finger<Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (35 days old) > > Handled-By : Jens Axboe<axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> > > This bug is still present in 2.6.35-rc4. Thanks for the update. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16173] After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs. 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (?) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, David Hill, Eric W. Biederman, H. Peter Anvin This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173 Subject : After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs. Submitter : David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net> Date : 2010-06-09 23:25 (30 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632 Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16175] 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (2 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 2:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro -1 siblings, 1 reply; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, andrew hendry This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16175] 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16175] 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 2:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: KOSAKI Motohiro @ 2010-07-09 2:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki, andrew hendry Cc: kosaki.motohiro, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free > Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 Andrew, I think this ticket can be closed, right? Rafael, can you please see following discussion? http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127744262109629&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16175] 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free @ 2010-07-09 2:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: KOSAKI Motohiro @ 2010-07-09 2:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki, andrew hendry Cc: kosaki.motohiro-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free > Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 Andrew, I think this ticket can be closed, right? Rafael, can you please see following discussion? http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127744262109629&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16175] 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free @ 2010-07-09 7:08 ` Andrew Hendry 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Andrew Hendry @ 2010-07-09 7:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki Yes this one can be closed, it was ramdisk too big. On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:53 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report >> of recent regressions. >> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team >> know (either way). >> >> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 >> Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free >> Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> >> Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) >> Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 > > Andrew, I think this ticket can be closed, right? > > Rafael, can you please see following discussion? > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127744262109629&w=2 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16175] 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free @ 2010-07-09 7:08 ` Andrew Hendry 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Andrew Hendry @ 2010-07-09 7:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki Yes this one can be closed, it was ramdisk too big. On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:53 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report >> of recent regressions. >> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team >> know (either way). >> >> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 >> Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free >> Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> >> Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) >> Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 > > Andrew, I think this ticket can be closed, right? > > Rafael, can you please see following discussion? > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127744262109629&w=2 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16175] 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free @ 2010-07-09 20:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Hendry Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Friday, July 09, 2010, Andrew Hendry wrote: > Yes this one can be closed, it was ramdisk too big. > > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:53 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro > <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > >> of recent regressions. > >> > >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > >> from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > >> know (either way). > >> > >> > >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 > >> Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free > >> Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > >> Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) > >> Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> > >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 > > > > Andrew, I think this ticket can be closed, right? > > > > Rafael, can you please see following discussion? > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127744262109629&w=2 Thanks for the update, bug closed. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16175] 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free @ 2010-07-09 20:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Hendry Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Friday, July 09, 2010, Andrew Hendry wrote: > Yes this one can be closed, it was ramdisk too big. > > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:53 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro > <kosaki.motohiro-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org> wrote: > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > >> of recent regressions. > >> > >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > >> from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > >> know (either way). > >> > >> > >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 > >> Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free > >> Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > >> Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) > >> Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> > >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 > > > > Andrew, I think this ticket can be closed, right? > > > > Rafael, can you please see following discussion? > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127744262109629&w=2 Thanks for the update, bug closed. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16145] Unable to boot unless "notsc" or "clocksource=hpet", or acpi_pad disabling the TSC 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Len Brown, Tom Gundersen, Venkatesh Pallipadi This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145 Subject : Unable to boot unless "notsc" or "clocksource=hpet", or acpi_pad disabling the TSC Submitter : Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Date : 2010-06-07 13:11 (32 days old) Handled-By : Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com> Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16145] Unable to boot unless "notsc" or "clocksource=hpet", or acpi_pad disabling the TSC @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Len Brown, Tom Gundersen, Venkatesh Pallipadi This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145 Subject : Unable to boot unless "notsc" or "clocksource=hpet", or acpi_pad disabling the TSC Submitter : Tom Gundersen <teg-B22kvLQNl6c@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-07 13:11 (32 days old) Handled-By : Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16169] Complain from preemptive debug 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (4 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 6:38 ` Sergey Senozhatsky -1 siblings, 1 reply; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Dmitry Monakhov, Sedat Dilek, Sergey Senozhatsky This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16169 Subject : Complain from preemptive debug Submitter : Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> Date : 2010-05-31 10:10 (39 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTilTnAAZIizKinYsxFkNTkrmPqk6XJJuUjjhJ7EP@mail.gmail.com> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/31/77 Handled-By : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Patch : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01631.html https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/106555/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16169] Complain from preemptive debug 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16169] Complain from preemptive debug Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 6:38 ` Sergey Senozhatsky 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2010-07-09 6:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Dmitry Monakhov, Sedat Dilek, Sergey Senozhatsky [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 848 bytes --] On (07/09/10 01:41), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16169 > Subject : Complain from preemptive debug > Submitter : Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> > Date : 2010-05-31 10:10 (39 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTilTnAAZIizKinYsxFkNTkrmPqk6XJJuUjjhJ7EP@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/31/77 > Handled-By : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> > Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > Patch : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01631.html > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/106555/ > > Hello, The patch (Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra - http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/1/32) is already in the kernel. Please see this thread http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/15/309 8c215bd3890c347dfb6a2db4779755f8b9c298a9 Sergey [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16169] Complain from preemptive debug @ 2010-07-09 6:38 ` Sergey Senozhatsky 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2010-07-09 6:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Dmitry Monakhov, Sedat Dilek, Sergey Senozhatsky [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 958 bytes --] On (07/09/10 01:41), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16169 > Subject : Complain from preemptive debug > Submitter : Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2010-05-31 10:10 (39 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTilTnAAZIizKinYsxFkNTkrmPqk6XJJuUjjhJ7EP-JsoAwUIsXouhRSP0FMvGiw@public.gmane.orgm> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/31/77 > Handled-By : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> > Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Patch : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01631.html > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/106555/ > > Hello, The patch (Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra - http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/1/32) is already in the kernel. Please see this thread http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/15/309 8c215bd3890c347dfb6a2db4779755f8b9c298a9 Sergey [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16169] Complain from preemptive debug 2010-07-09 6:38 ` Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2010-07-09 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Dmitry Monakhov, Sedat Dilek On Friday, July 09, 2010, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (07/09/10 01:41), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16169 > > Subject : Complain from preemptive debug > > Submitter : Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> > > Date : 2010-05-31 10:10 (39 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTilTnAAZIizKinYsxFkNTkrmPqk6XJJuUjjhJ7EP@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/31/77 > > Handled-By : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> > > Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > > Patch : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01631.html > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/106555/ > > > > > > Hello, > The patch (Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra - http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/1/32) > is already in the kernel. Please see this thread > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/15/309 > > 8c215bd3890c347dfb6a2db4779755f8b9c298a9 The bug has been closed, thanks for the update. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16169] Complain from preemptive debug @ 2010-07-09 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Dmitry Monakhov, Sedat Dilek On Friday, July 09, 2010, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (07/09/10 01:41), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16169 > > Subject : Complain from preemptive debug > > Submitter : Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-05-31 10:10 (39 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTilTnAAZIizKinYsxFkNTkrmPqk6XJJuUjjhJ7EP-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/31/77 > > Handled-By : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> > > Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Patch : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01631.html > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/106555/ > > > > > > Hello, > The patch (Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra - http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/1/32) > is already in the kernel. Please see this thread > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/15/309 > > 8c215bd3890c347dfb6a2db4779755f8b9c298a9 The bug has been closed, thanks for the update. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16184] Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (5 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jean-Marc Pigeon, Patrick McHardy This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184 Subject : Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule Submitter : Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp@safe.ca> Date : 2010-06-12 04:17 (27 days old) Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16179] 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Norbert Preining This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16179] 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Norbert Preining This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining-DX+603jRYB8@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399-DqSSrKF0TaySnEC3TeqHn5dqbFPxfnh/@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16187] Carrier detection failed in dhcpcd when link is up 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (7 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki, Christian Casteyde, David S. Miller, Jan Engelhardt This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16187 Subject : Carrier detection failed in dhcpcd when link is up Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> Date : 2010-06-12 15:15 (27 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/10708f37ae729baba9b67bd134c3720709d4ae62 Handled-By : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16199] 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (8 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Miles Lane This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16199 Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-07 18:14 (32 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTin2pPqOUx--9fIX3BH3e-cU6oCRufijcx_4ozx5@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127593447812015&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16215] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/class/net/bnep0' 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (9 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Eric W. Biederman, Janusz Krzysztofik This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16215 Subject : sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/class/net/bnep0' Submitter : Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> Date : 2010-06-15 14:55 (24 days old) Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16215#c10 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16205] acpi: freeing invalid memtype bf799000-bf79a000 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (10 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Marcin Slusarz This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16205 Subject : acpi: freeing invalid memtype bf799000-bf79a000 Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-09 20:09 (30 days old) Message-ID : <20100609200910.GA2876@joi.lan> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611427029914&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127688398513862&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16197] [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (11 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 0:33 ` Jesse Barnes -1 siblings, 1 reply; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Chiang, Jesse Barnes, Ryan Wang This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197 Subject : [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' Submitter : Ryan Wang <openspace.wang@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-07 0:23 (32 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTincwMZPnYW3S4uz4k2GOn52RpgBIBRfzyD010Yo@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127587022219378&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16197] [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16197] [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 0:33 ` Jesse Barnes 2010-07-09 20:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 187+ messages in thread From: Jesse Barnes @ 2010-07-09 0:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Chiang, Ryan Wang On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 01:41:34 +0200 (CEST) "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197 > Subject : [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' > Submitter : Ryan Wang <openspace.wang@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-07 0:23 (32 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTincwMZPnYW3S4uz4k2GOn52RpgBIBRfzyD010Yo@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127587022219378&w=2 I thought this one was closed with the revert of the slot symlink? -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16197] [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' @ 2010-07-09 20:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Chiang, Ryan Wang On Friday, July 09, 2010, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 01:41:34 +0200 (CEST) > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197 > > Subject : [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' > > Submitter : Ryan Wang <openspace.wang@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-07 0:23 (32 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTincwMZPnYW3S4uz4k2GOn52RpgBIBRfzyD010Yo@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127587022219378&w=2 > > I thought this one was closed with the revert of the slot symlink? You're right, closing. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16197] [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' @ 2010-07-09 20:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Chiang, Ryan Wang On Friday, July 09, 2010, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 01:41:34 +0200 (CEST) > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197 > > Subject : [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' > > Submitter : Ryan Wang <openspace.wang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-06-07 0:23 (32 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTincwMZPnYW3S4uz4k2GOn52RpgBIBRfzyD010Yo-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127587022219378&w=2 > > I thought this one was closed with the revert of the slot symlink? You're right, closing. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16201] SIOCGIWFREQ ioctl fails to get frequency info 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (12 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, nuh This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16201 Subject : SIOCGIWFREQ ioctl fails to get frequency info Submitter : nuh <nuh@mailinator.net> Date : 2010-06-14 10:45 (25 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16230] inconsistent IN-HARDIRQ-W -> HARDIRQ-ON-W usage: fasync, 2.6.35-rc3 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (13 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Dominik Brodowski This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16230 Subject : inconsistent IN-HARDIRQ-W -> HARDIRQ-ON-W usage: fasync, 2.6.35-rc3 Submitter : Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Date : 2010-06-13 9:53 (26 days old) Message-ID : <20100613095305.GA13231@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127642282208277&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16228] BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (14 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Bjorn Helgaas, Brian Bloniarz, Yinghai Lu This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228 Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) Submitter : Brian Bloniarz <phunge0@hotmail.com> Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (23 days old) Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16221] 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Miles Lane This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221 Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-11 20:31 (28 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTim0jVRyqkwlGOcrg_XTvUQwcBYfWJX-aRzkkrLG@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16221] 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Miles Lane This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221 Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-11 20:31 (28 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTim0jVRyqkwlGOcrg_XTvUQwcBYfWJX-aRzkkrLG-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16255] 2.6.35-rc3 deadlocks on semaphore operations 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christoph Lameter, Manfred Spraul This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16255 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 deadlocks on semaphore operations Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Date : 2010-06-18 14:49 (21 days old) Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.00.1006180940140.11575@router.home> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127687262727707&w=2 Handled-By : Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127731055203402&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16255] 2.6.35-rc3 deadlocks on semaphore operations @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christoph Lameter, Manfred Spraul This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16255 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 deadlocks on semaphore operations Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-18 14:49 (21 days old) Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.00.1006180940140.11575-sBS69tsa9Uj/9pzu0YdTqQ@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127687262727707&w=2 Handled-By : Manfred Spraul <manfred-nhLOkwUX5cPe2c5cEj3t2g@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127731055203402&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16232] 2.6.35-rc3 - WARNING:iwl_set_dynamic_key 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (17 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Mario Guenterberg, Reinette Chatre This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16232 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 - WARNING:iwl_set_dynamic_key Submitter : Mario Guenterberg <mario.guenterberg@googlemail.com> Date : 2010-06-14 11:55 (25 days old) Message-ID : <20100614115510.GA7904@guenti-laptop> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127651695627147&w=2 Handled-By : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Patch : http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/52893 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16234] [2.6.35-rc3] reboot mutex 'bug'... 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (18 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Daniel J Blueman This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16234 Subject : [2.6.35-rc3] reboot mutex 'bug'... Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-14 15:16 (25 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTimDcTnyEPmt2ZcCM1UWtn4AYKotiqyjobJApkO7@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127652861118933&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Dave Airlie, Theodore Ts'o This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265 Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (30 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb@closure.thunk.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Dave Airlie, Theodore Ts'o This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265 Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (30 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb-UK71uKi2zisAobODsErMgNi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16256] tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (20 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 6:23 ` Helmut Schaa -1 siblings, 1 reply; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, David Safford, Helmut Schaa, James Morris, Rajiv Andrade This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16256 Subject : tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34 Submitter : Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Date : 2010-06-20 11:15 (19 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/225a9be24d799aa16d543c31fb09f0c9ed1d9caa Handled-By : Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=tpmdd-devel&m=127609160616162&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16256] tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16256] tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 6:23 ` Helmut Schaa 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Helmut Schaa @ 2010-07-09 6:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, David Safford, James Morris, Rajiv Andrade Am Freitag 09 Juli 2010 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16256 > Subject : tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34 > Submitter : Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> > Date : 2010-06-20 11:15 (19 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/225a9be24d799aa16d543c31fb09f0c9ed1d9caa > Handled-By : Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=tpmdd-devel&m=127609160616162&w=2 Seems like the patch didn't make it into mainline yet. So I guess it should still be listed here. Helmut ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16256] tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-09 6:23 ` Helmut Schaa 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Helmut Schaa @ 2010-07-09 6:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, David Safford, James Morris, Rajiv Andrade Am Freitag 09 Juli 2010 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16256 > Subject : tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34 > Submitter : Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2010-06-20 11:15 (19 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/225a9be24d799aa16d543c31fb09f0c9ed1d9caa > Handled-By : Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=tpmdd-devel&m=127609160616162&w=2 Seems like the patch didn't make it into mainline yet. So I guess it should still be listed here. Helmut ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16256] tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-09 20:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Helmut Schaa Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, David Safford, James Morris, Rajiv Andrade On Friday, July 09, 2010, Helmut Schaa wrote: > Am Freitag 09 Juli 2010 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16256 > > Subject : tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34 > > Submitter : Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-20 11:15 (19 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/225a9be24d799aa16d543c31fb09f0c9ed1d9caa > > Handled-By : Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> > > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=tpmdd-devel&m=127609160616162&w=2 > > Seems like the patch didn't make it into mainline yet. So I guess it should > still be listed here. Yes, thanks for the update. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16256] tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-09 20:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Helmut Schaa Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, David Safford, James Morris, Rajiv Andrade On Friday, July 09, 2010, Helmut Schaa wrote: > Am Freitag 09 Juli 2010 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16256 > > Subject : tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34 > > Submitter : Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-06-20 11:15 (19 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/225a9be24d799aa16d543c31fb09f0c9ed1d9caa > > Handled-By : Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> > > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=tpmdd-devel&m=127609160616162&w=2 > > Seems like the patch didn't make it into mainline yet. So I guess it should > still be listed here. Yes, thanks for the update. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16257] sysfs changes break hwsim and bnep drivers 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (21 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Eric W. Biederman, Johannes Berg, Kay Sievers This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16257 Subject : sysfs changes break hwsim and bnep drivers Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Date : 2010-06-20 11:23 (19 days old) References : http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/162754 Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16284] Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (22 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Paul Mackerras This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16284 Subject : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code Submitter : Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Date : 2010-06-23 12:57 (16 days old) Message-ID : <20100623125740.GA3368@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127729789113432&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16288] kernel panic with iwlagn for Intel Wifi Link 5100 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Reinette Chatre, yanshuang.zheng This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16288 Subject : kernel panic with iwlagn for Intel Wifi Link 5100 Submitter : <yanshuang.zheng@intel.com> Date : 2010-06-25 08:14 (14 days old) Handled-By : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16288] kernel panic with iwlagn for Intel Wifi Link 5100 @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Reinette Chatre, yanshuang.zheng This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16288 Subject : kernel panic with iwlagn for Intel Wifi Link 5100 Submitter : <yanshuang.zheng@intel.com> Date : 2010-06-25 08:14 (14 days old) Handled-By : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16278] lvm snapshot causes deadlock in 2.6.35 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (24 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Eric Sandeen, Phillip Susi This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16278 Subject : lvm snapshot causes deadlock in 2.6.35 Submitter : Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com> Date : 2010-06-23 16:55 (16 days old) Handled-By : Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26933 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16271] 2.6.35-rc3 regression: IBM Maia system is unbootable [ACPI related?] 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, James Bottomley, Len Brown This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16271 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 regression: IBM Maia system is unbootable [ACPI related?] Submitter : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> Date : 2010-06-21 16:03 (18 days old) Message-ID : <1277136189.10998.63.camel@mulgrave.site> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127713622821166&w=2 Handled-By : Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/108497/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16271] 2.6.35-rc3 regression: IBM Maia system is unbootable [ACPI related?] @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, James Bottomley, Len Brown This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16271 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 regression: IBM Maia system is unbootable [ACPI related?] Submitter : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-JuX6DAaQMKPCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-21 16:03 (18 days old) Message-ID : <1277136189.10998.63.camel-0iu6Cu4xQGLYCGPCin2YbQ@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127713622821166&w=2 Handled-By : Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/108497/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16306] 2.6.35-rc3 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 cifs_show_options 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Hendry, Jeff Layton This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16306 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 cifs_show_options Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-26 10:46 (13 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTilhTrEBYZd4HxeXQk8B6-yV8rCJ2C0jXsEREgIR@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127754922110501&w=2 Handled-By : Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16306] 2.6.35-rc3 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 cifs_show_options @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Hendry, Jeff Layton This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16306 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 cifs_show_options Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-26 10:46 (13 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTilhTrEBYZd4HxeXQk8B6-yV8rCJ2C0jXsEREgIR-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127754922110501&w=2 Handled-By : Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16306] 2.6.35-rc3 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 cifs_show_options 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 0:49 ` Jeff Layton -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Jeff Layton @ 2010-07-09 0:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Hendry On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 01:41:39 +0200 (CEST) "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16306 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 cifs_show_options > Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-26 10:46 (13 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTilhTrEBYZd4HxeXQk8B6-yV8rCJ2C0jXsEREgIR@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127754922110501&w=2 > Handled-By : Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> > > Not sure if this is a new bug or not... I don't think this is really a CIFS bug, per-se. It seems like the problem may be that the iterator for /proc/pid/mountinfo is not sufficiently protected against removal from the vfsmount list. Filesystems don't seem to be expected to do any locking in their show_options routines though so I'm guessing that something is borked in the generic vfs layer. Either that or this is some sort of generic mem corruption? I'm open to input from others that have a better grasp of this stuff at the VFS layer... -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16306] 2.6.35-rc3 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 cifs_show_options @ 2010-07-09 0:49 ` Jeff Layton 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Jeff Layton @ 2010-07-09 0:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Hendry On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 01:41:39 +0200 (CEST) "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16306 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 cifs_show_options > Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2010-06-26 10:46 (13 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTilhTrEBYZd4HxeXQk8B6-yV8rCJ2C0jXsEREgIR-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127754922110501&w=2 > Handled-By : Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > > Not sure if this is a new bug or not... I don't think this is really a CIFS bug, per-se. It seems like the problem may be that the iterator for /proc/pid/mountinfo is not sufficiently protected against removal from the vfsmount list. Filesystems don't seem to be expected to do any locking in their show_options routines though so I'm guessing that something is borked in the generic vfs layer. Either that or this is some sort of generic mem corruption? I'm open to input from others that have a better grasp of this stuff at the VFS layer... -- Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16306] 2.6.35-rc3 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 cifs_show_options @ 2010-07-09 1:03 ` Andrew Hendry 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Andrew Hendry @ 2010-07-09 1:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff Layton Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki It might not be a regression, and so far i haven't been able to reproduce. Its seems to be related to suspend/resume interface up/down and mount/unmount. Also potentially with cifs waiting for a NAS to spinup to complete mount. On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 01:41:39 +0200 (CEST) > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report >> of recent regressions. >> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team >> know (either way). >> >> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16306 >> Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 cifs_show_options >> Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> >> Date : 2010-06-26 10:46 (13 days old) >> Message-ID : <AANLkTilhTrEBYZd4HxeXQk8B6-yV8rCJ2C0jXsEREgIR@mail.gmail.com> >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127754922110501&w=2 >> Handled-By : Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> >> >> > > Not sure if this is a new bug or not... > > I don't think this is really a CIFS bug, per-se. It seems like the > problem may be that the iterator for /proc/pid/mountinfo is not > sufficiently protected against removal from the vfsmount list. > > Filesystems don't seem to be expected to do any locking in their > show_options routines though so I'm guessing that something is borked > in the generic vfs layer. > > Either that or this is some sort of generic mem corruption? I'm open to > input from others that have a better grasp of this stuff at the VFS > layer... > > -- > Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16306] 2.6.35-rc3 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 cifs_show_options @ 2010-07-09 1:03 ` Andrew Hendry 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Andrew Hendry @ 2010-07-09 1:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff Layton Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki It might not be a regression, and so far i haven't been able to reproduce. Its seems to be related to suspend/resume interface up/down and mount/unmount. Also potentially with cifs waiting for a NAS to spinup to complete mount. On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 01:41:39 +0200 (CEST) > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote: > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report >> of recent regressions. >> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team >> know (either way). >> >> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16306 >> Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 cifs_show_options >> Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> >> Date : 2010-06-26 10:46 (13 days old) >> Message-ID : <AANLkTilhTrEBYZd4HxeXQk8B6-yV8rCJ2C0jXsEREgIR@mail.gmail.com> >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127754922110501&w=2 >> Handled-By : Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> >> >> > > Not sure if this is a new bug or not... > > I don't think this is really a CIFS bug, per-se. It seems like the > problem may be that the iterator for /proc/pid/mountinfo is not > sufficiently protected against removal from the vfsmount list. > > Filesystems don't seem to be expected to do any locking in their > show_options routines though so I'm guessing that something is borked > in the generic vfs layer. > > Either that or this is some sort of generic mem corruption? I'm open to > input from others that have a better grasp of this stuff at the VFS > layer... > > -- > Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16306] 2.6.35-rc3 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 cifs_show_options @ 2010-07-09 20:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Hendry Cc: Jeff Layton, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Friday, July 09, 2010, Andrew Hendry wrote: > It might not be a regression, and so far i haven't been able to reproduce. > Its seems to be related to suspend/resume interface up/down and mount/unmount. > Also potentially with cifs waiting for a NAS to spinup to complete mount. OK, so I'm going to close it for now. Please let me know if you can reproduce it. Also I think it's not a regression. Rafael > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 01:41:39 +0200 (CEST) > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > >> of recent regressions. > >> > >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > >> from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > >> know (either way). > >> > >> > >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16306 > >> Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 cifs_show_options > >> Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > >> Date : 2010-06-26 10:46 (13 days old) > >> Message-ID : <AANLkTilhTrEBYZd4HxeXQk8B6-yV8rCJ2C0jXsEREgIR@mail.gmail.com> > >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127754922110501&w=2 > >> Handled-By : Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> > >> > >> > > > > Not sure if this is a new bug or not... > > > > I don't think this is really a CIFS bug, per-se. It seems like the > > problem may be that the iterator for /proc/pid/mountinfo is not > > sufficiently protected against removal from the vfsmount list. > > > > Filesystems don't seem to be expected to do any locking in their > > show_options routines though so I'm guessing that something is borked > > in the generic vfs layer. > > > > Either that or this is some sort of generic mem corruption? I'm open to > > input from others that have a better grasp of this stuff at the VFS > > layer... > > > > -- > > Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16306] 2.6.35-rc3 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 cifs_show_options @ 2010-07-09 20:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Hendry Cc: Jeff Layton, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Friday, July 09, 2010, Andrew Hendry wrote: > It might not be a regression, and so far i haven't been able to reproduce. > Its seems to be related to suspend/resume interface up/down and mount/unmount. > Also potentially with cifs waiting for a NAS to spinup to complete mount. OK, so I'm going to close it for now. Please let me know if you can reproduce it. Also I think it's not a regression. Rafael > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 01:41:39 +0200 (CEST) > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > >> of recent regressions. > >> > >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > >> from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > >> know (either way). > >> > >> > >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16306 > >> Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 cifs_show_options > >> Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > >> Date : 2010-06-26 10:46 (13 days old) > >> Message-ID : <AANLkTilhTrEBYZd4HxeXQk8B6-yV8rCJ2C0jXsEREgIR-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> > >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127754922110501&w=2 > >> Handled-By : Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > >> > >> > > > > Not sure if this is a new bug or not... > > > > I don't think this is really a CIFS bug, per-se. It seems like the > > problem may be that the iterator for /proc/pid/mountinfo is not > > sufficiently protected against removal from the vfsmount list. > > > > Filesystems don't seem to be expected to do any locking in their > > show_options routines though so I'm guessing that something is borked > > in the generic vfs layer. > > > > Either that or this is some sort of generic mem corruption? I'm open to > > input from others that have a better grasp of this stuff at the VFS > > layer... > > > > -- > > Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16304] i915 - high number of wakeups 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Enrico Bandiello This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16304 Subject : i915 - high number of wakeups Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> Date : 2010-06-27 09:52 (12 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16304] i915 - high number of wakeups @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Enrico Bandiello This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16304 Subject : i915 - high number of wakeups Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-27 09:52 (12 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16294] [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (28 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 0:45 ` Kees Cook -1 siblings, 1 reply; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Chris Wilson, Eric Anholt, Kees Cook This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16294 Subject : [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver Submitter : Kees Cook <kees@outflux.net> Date : 2010-06-25 18:20 (14 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/f1befe71fa7a79ab733011b045639d8d809924ad ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16294] [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16294] [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 0:45 ` Kees Cook 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Kees Cook @ 2010-07-09 0:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Chris Wilson Hi Rafael, On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 01:41:39AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). Yup, this is still a regression. The fix is trivial (see below). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16294 > Subject : [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver > Submitter : Kees Cook <kees@outflux.net> > Date : 2010-06-25 18:20 (14 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/f1befe71fa7a79ab733011b045639d8d809924ad diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c index 9344216..0d9007d 100644 --- a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c +++ b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c @@ -1229,6 +1229,7 @@ static int intel_i915_get_gtt_size(void) (gmch_ctrl & G33_PGETBL_SIZE_MASK)); size = 512; } + size = 1024; } else { /* On previous hardware, the GTT size was just what was * required to map the aperture. -- Kees Cook @outflux.net ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16294] [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver @ 2010-07-09 0:45 ` Kees Cook 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Kees Cook @ 2010-07-09 0:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Chris Wilson Hi Rafael, On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 01:41:39AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). Yup, this is still a regression. The fix is trivial (see below). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16294 > Subject : [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver > Submitter : Kees Cook <kees-oSa+0FWJbaXR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2010-06-25 18:20 (14 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/f1befe71fa7a79ab733011b045639d8d809924ad diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c index 9344216..0d9007d 100644 --- a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c +++ b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c @@ -1229,6 +1229,7 @@ static int intel_i915_get_gtt_size(void) (gmch_ctrl & G33_PGETBL_SIZE_MASK)); size = 512; } + size = 1024; } else { /* On previous hardware, the GTT size was just what was * required to map the aperture. -- Kees Cook @outflux.net ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16294] [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver @ 2010-07-09 20:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kees Cook; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Friday, July 09, 2010, Kees Cook wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 01:41:39AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > Yup, this is still a regression. The fix is trivial (see below). Thanks for the update. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16294 > > Subject : [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver > > Submitter : Kees Cook <kees@outflux.net> > > Date : 2010-06-25 18:20 (14 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/f1befe71fa7a79ab733011b045639d8d809924ad > > diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c > index 9344216..0d9007d 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c > +++ b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c > @@ -1229,6 +1229,7 @@ static int intel_i915_get_gtt_size(void) > (gmch_ctrl & G33_PGETBL_SIZE_MASK)); > size = 512; > } > + size = 1024; > } else { > /* On previous hardware, the GTT size was just what was > * required to map the aperture. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16294] [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver @ 2010-07-09 20:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kees Cook; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Friday, July 09, 2010, Kees Cook wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 01:41:39AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > Yup, this is still a regression. The fix is trivial (see below). Thanks for the update. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16294 > > Subject : [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver > > Submitter : Kees Cook <kees-oSa+0FWJbaXR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-06-25 18:20 (14 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/f1befe71fa7a79ab733011b045639d8d809924ad > > diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c > index 9344216..0d9007d 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c > +++ b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c > @@ -1229,6 +1229,7 @@ static int intel_i915_get_gtt_size(void) > (gmch_ctrl & G33_PGETBL_SIZE_MASK)); > size = 512; > } > + size = 1024; > } else { > /* On previous hardware, the GTT size was just what was > * required to map the aperture. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16294] [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver @ 2010-07-09 21:12 ` Tim Gardner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Tim Gardner @ 2010-07-09 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Kees Cook, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On 07/09/2010 02:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, July 09, 2010, Kees Cook wrote: >> Hi Rafael, >> >> On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 01:41:39AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >>> from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team >>> know (either way). >> >> Yup, this is still a regression. The fix is trivial (see below). > > Thanks for the update. > >>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16294 >>> Subject : [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver >>> Submitter : Kees Cook<kees@outflux.net> >>> Date : 2010-06-25 18:20 (14 days old) >>> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/f1befe71fa7a79ab733011b045639d8d809924ad >> >> diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c >> index 9344216..0d9007d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c >> +++ b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c >> @@ -1229,6 +1229,7 @@ static int intel_i915_get_gtt_size(void) >> (gmch_ctrl& G33_PGETBL_SIZE_MASK)); >> size = 512; >> } >> + size = 1024; >> } else { >> /* On previous hardware, the GTT size was just what was >> * required to map the aperture. > > Rafael > -- Rafael - I forgot to Cc you on the patch I just sent to Dave Arlie. Kees has confirmed that it fixes his problem. http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127870855118533&w=2 rtg -- Tim Gardner tim.gardner@canonical.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16294] [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver @ 2010-07-09 21:12 ` Tim Gardner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Tim Gardner @ 2010-07-09 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Kees Cook, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On 07/09/2010 02:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, July 09, 2010, Kees Cook wrote: >> Hi Rafael, >> >> On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 01:41:39AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >>> from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team >>> know (either way). >> >> Yup, this is still a regression. The fix is trivial (see below). > > Thanks for the update. > >>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16294 >>> Subject : [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver >>> Submitter : Kees Cook<kees-oSa+0FWJbaXR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> >>> Date : 2010-06-25 18:20 (14 days old) >>> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/f1befe71fa7a79ab733011b045639d8d809924ad >> >> diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c >> index 9344216..0d9007d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c >> +++ b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c >> @@ -1229,6 +1229,7 @@ static int intel_i915_get_gtt_size(void) >> (gmch_ctrl& G33_PGETBL_SIZE_MASK)); >> size = 512; >> } >> + size = 1024; >> } else { >> /* On previous hardware, the GTT size was just what was >> * required to map the aperture. > > Rafael > -- Rafael - I forgot to Cc you on the patch I just sent to Dave Arlie. Kees has confirmed that it fixes his problem. http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127870855118533&w=2 rtg -- Tim Gardner tim.gardner-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16294] [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver @ 2010-07-09 21:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: tim.gardner Cc: Kees Cook, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Friday, July 09, 2010, Tim Gardner wrote: > On 07/09/2010 02:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, July 09, 2010, Kees Cook wrote: > >> Hi Rafael, > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 01:41:39AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > >>> from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > >>> know (either way). > >> > >> Yup, this is still a regression. The fix is trivial (see below). > > > > Thanks for the update. > > > >>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16294 > >>> Subject : [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver > >>> Submitter : Kees Cook<kees@outflux.net> > >>> Date : 2010-06-25 18:20 (14 days old) > >>> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/f1befe71fa7a79ab733011b045639d8d809924ad > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c > >> index 9344216..0d9007d 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c > >> +++ b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c > >> @@ -1229,6 +1229,7 @@ static int intel_i915_get_gtt_size(void) > >> (gmch_ctrl& G33_PGETBL_SIZE_MASK)); > >> size = 512; > >> } > >> + size = 1024; > >> } else { > >> /* On previous hardware, the GTT size was just what was > >> * required to map the aperture. > > > > Rafael > > -- > > Rafael - I forgot to Cc you on the patch I just sent to Dave Arlie. Kees > has confirmed that it fixes his problem. > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127870855118533&w=2 OK, I've added the patch information to the bug entry. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16294] [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver @ 2010-07-09 21:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: tim.gardner-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw Cc: Kees Cook, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Friday, July 09, 2010, Tim Gardner wrote: > On 07/09/2010 02:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, July 09, 2010, Kees Cook wrote: > >> Hi Rafael, > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 01:41:39AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > >>> from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > >>> know (either way). > >> > >> Yup, this is still a regression. The fix is trivial (see below). > > > > Thanks for the update. > > > >>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16294 > >>> Subject : [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver > >>> Submitter : Kees Cook<kees-oSa+0FWJbaXR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> > >>> Date : 2010-06-25 18:20 (14 days old) > >>> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/f1befe71fa7a79ab733011b045639d8d809924ad > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c > >> index 9344216..0d9007d 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c > >> +++ b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c > >> @@ -1229,6 +1229,7 @@ static int intel_i915_get_gtt_size(void) > >> (gmch_ctrl& G33_PGETBL_SIZE_MASK)); > >> size = 512; > >> } > >> + size = 1024; > >> } else { > >> /* On previous hardware, the GTT size was just what was > >> * required to map the aperture. > > > > Rafael > > -- > > Rafael - I forgot to Cc you on the patch I just sent to Dave Arlie. Kees > has confirmed that it fixes his problem. > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127870855118533&w=2 OK, I've added the patch information to the bug entry. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16307] i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (29 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Enrico Bandiello This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307 Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (13 days old) Message-ID : <4C26317A.5070309@postal.uv.es> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16309] 2.6.35-rc3 oops trying to suspend. 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (30 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Hendry This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16309 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 oops trying to suspend. Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-27 12:40 (12 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTinUH2p33-AWxOVDrLsNkn9rgEVrlwn5mfK7P8NH@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127764249926781&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16311] [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (31 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 3:00 ` Shawn Starr -1 siblings, 1 reply; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Shawn Starr This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop Submitter : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days old) Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr@rogers.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16311] [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16311] [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 3:00 ` Shawn Starr 2010-07-09 21:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 187+ messages in thread From: Shawn Starr @ 2010-07-09 3:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Thursday, July 08, 2010 07:41:40 pm Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the > tracking team know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 > laptop Submitter : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> > Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days old) > Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr@rogers.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 Continues with July 7th, snapshot of 2.6.35-rc4. Some more info: I have USB in use while trying to suspend. A USB Microsoft Mouse and a QuickCam Pro 9000 camera connected. Thanks. Shawn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16311] [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop @ 2010-07-09 21:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shawn Starr Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Friday, July 09, 2010, Shawn Starr wrote: > On Thursday, July 08, 2010 07:41:40 pm Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the > > tracking team know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 > > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 > > laptop Submitter : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> > > Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days old) > > Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr@rogers.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 > > Continues with July 7th, snapshot of 2.6.35-rc4. > > Some more info: I have USB in use while trying to suspend. A USB Microsoft > Mouse and a QuickCam Pro 9000 camera connected. Well, can you please try to suspend without the USB devices and see if the bug is still reproducible, then? Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16311] [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop @ 2010-07-09 21:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shawn Starr Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Friday, July 09, 2010, Shawn Starr wrote: > On Thursday, July 08, 2010 07:41:40 pm Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the > > tracking team know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 > > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 > > laptop Submitter : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days old) > > Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 > > Continues with July 7th, snapshot of 2.6.35-rc4. > > Some more info: I have USB in use while trying to suspend. A USB Microsoft > Mouse and a QuickCam Pro 9000 camera connected. Well, can you please try to suspend without the USB devices and see if the bug is still reproducible, then? Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16311] [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop 2010-07-09 21:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (?) @ 2010-07-09 22:29 ` Shawn Starr -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Shawn Starr @ 2010-07-09 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki ----- Original Message ---- From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> To: Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>; Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> Sent: Fri, July 9, 2010 5:01:25 PM Subject: Re: [Bug #16311] [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop On Friday, July 09, 2010, Shawn Starr wrote: > On Thursday, July 08, 2010 07:41:40 pm Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the > > tracking team know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 > > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 > > laptop Submitter : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> > > Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days old) > > Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr@rogers.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 > > Continues with July 7th, snapshot of 2.6.35-rc4. > > Some more info: I have USB in use while trying to suspend. A USB Microsoft > Mouse and a QuickCam Pro 9000 camera connected. >>Well, can you please try to suspend without the USB devices and see if the bug >>is still reproducible, then? >> >>Rafael Yes, will try that today. Thanks, Shawn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Zdenek Kabelac This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312 Subject : WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-28 9:40 (11 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTin24fr5O4_q5Xbo9Y_NKkEmtcp6Hgmr9_4qXaFz@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127771804806465&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Zdenek Kabelac This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312 Subject : WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-28 9:40 (11 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTin24fr5O4_q5Xbo9Y_NKkEmtcp6Hgmr9_4qXaFz-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127771804806465&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16310] arm omap invalid module format 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (33 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Michal Marek, Robert Nelson This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16310 Subject : arm omap invalid module format Submitter : Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-28 17:30 (11 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/d0679c730395d0bde9a46939e7ba255b4ba7dd7c Handled-By : Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26999 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16322] WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70() 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (34 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, boris64, H. Peter Anvin This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16322 Subject : WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70() Submitter : boris64 <bugzilla.kernel.org@boris64.net> Date : 2010-07-01 13:54 (8 days old) Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16332] Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open) 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, werner@guyane.yi.org This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16332 Subject : Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open) Submitter : werner@guyane.yi.org Date : 2010-07-02 3:34 (7 days old) Message-ID : <1278041650.12788@guyane.yi.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127804167511930&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16332] Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, werner-K1X7VnsBORrsrOwW+9ziJQ@public.gmane.org This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16332 Subject : Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open) Submitter : werner-K1X7VnsBORrsrOwW+9ziJQ@public.gmane.org Date : 2010-07-02 3:34 (7 days old) Message-ID : <1278041650.12788-K1X7VnsBORrsrOwW+9ziJQ@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127804167511930&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16329] 2.6.35-rc3: Load average climbing to 3+ with no apparent reason: CPU 98% idle, with hardly no I/O 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (36 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Török Edwin This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16329 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3: Load average climbing to 3+ with no apparent reason: CPU 98% idle, with hardly no I/O Submitter : Török Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com> Date : 2010-07-01 7:40 (8 days old) Message-ID : <20100701104022.404410d6@debian> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127797005030536&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16333] iwl3945: HARDWARE GONE?? 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Priit Laes This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16333 Subject : iwl3945: HARDWARE GONE?? Submitter : Priit Laes <plaes@plaes.org> Date : 2010-07-02 16:02 (7 days old) Message-ID : <1278086575.2889.8.camel@chi> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127808659705983&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16333] iwl3945: HARDWARE GONE?? @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Priit Laes This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16333 Subject : iwl3945: HARDWARE GONE?? Submitter : Priit Laes <plaes-q/aMd4JkU83YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-07-02 16:02 (7 days old) Message-ID : <1278086575.2889.8.camel@chi> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127808659705983&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16330] Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3? 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (38 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Thomas Renninger This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16330 Subject : Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3? Submitter : Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Date : 2010-07-01 15:44 (8 days old) Message-ID : <201007011744.19564.trenn@suse.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127799907218877&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16324] Oops while running fs_racer test on a POWER6 box against latest git 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (39 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, divya This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16324 Subject : Oops while running fs_racer test on a POWER6 box against latest git Submitter : divya <dipraksh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2010-06-30 11:34 (9 days old) Message-ID : <4C2B28F3.7000006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127789697303061&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16323] 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (40 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Miles Lane This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16323 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> Date : 2010-07-01 12:21 (8 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTini6hz2LFeZi8CMUmY3xw1MU7NxmyesuxZ4oCdo@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Justin P. Mattock This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337 Subject : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP Submitter : Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com> Date : 2010-07-03 22:59 (6 days old) Message-ID : <4C2FC0E3.6050101@gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Justin P. Mattock This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337 Subject : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP Submitter : Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-07-03 22:59 (6 days old) Message-ID : <4C2FC0E3.6050101-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16334] reiserfs locking (v2) 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (42 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Sergey Senozhatsky This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16334 Subject : reiserfs locking (v2) Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Date : 2010-07-02 9:34 (7 days old) Message-ID : <20100702093451.GA3973@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127806306303590&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16346] 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Miles Lane This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16346 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> Date : 2010-07-04 22:04 (5 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTinof0k28rk4rMr66aubxcRL2rFa5ZEArj1lqD3o@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127828107815930&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16346] 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Miles Lane This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16346 Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-07-04 22:04 (5 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTinof0k28rk4rMr66aubxcRL2rFa5ZEArj1lqD3o-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127828107815930&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16353] 2.6.35 regression 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Zeev Tarantov This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 Subject : 2.6.35 regression Submitter : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov@gmail.com> Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old) Message-ID : <loom.20100705T144459-919@post.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16353] 2.6.35 regression @ 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Zeev Tarantov This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 Subject : 2.6.35 regression Submitter : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old) Message-ID : <loom.20100705T144459-919-eS7Uydv5nfjZ+VzJOa5vwg@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16353] 2.6.35 regression 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 8:50 ` Zeev Tarantov -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Zeev Tarantov @ 2010-07-09 8:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 02:41, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 > Subject : 2.6.35 regression > Submitter : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old) > Message-ID : <loom.20100705T144459-919@post.gmane.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2 There's a working patch by Steven Rostedt at http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127864600425732&w=2 -Zeev ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16353] 2.6.35 regression @ 2010-07-09 8:50 ` Zeev Tarantov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Zeev Tarantov @ 2010-07-09 8:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 02:41, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 > Subject : 2.6.35 regression > Submitter : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old) > Message-ID : <loom.20100705T144459-919-eS7Uydv5nfjZ+VzJOa5vwg@public.gmane.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2 There's a working patch by Steven Rostedt at http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127864600425732&w=2 -Zeev ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16353] 2.6.35 regression @ 2010-07-09 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zeev Tarantov Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Friday, July 09, 2010, Zeev Tarantov wrote: > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 02:41, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 > > Subject : 2.6.35 regression > > Submitter : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old) > > Message-ID : <loom.20100705T144459-919@post.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2 > > > There's a working patch by Steven Rostedt at > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127864600425732&w=2 Thanks, I've added the patch information to the bug entry. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16353] 2.6.35 regression @ 2010-07-09 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zeev Tarantov Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Friday, July 09, 2010, Zeev Tarantov wrote: > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 02:41, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 > > Subject : 2.6.35 regression > > Submitter : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old) > > Message-ID : <loom.20100705T144459-919-eS7Uydv5nfjZ+VzJOa5vwg@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2 > > > There's a working patch by Steven Rostedt at > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127864600425732&w=2 Thanks, I've added the patch information to the bug entry. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (45 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 0:16 ` Sedat Dilek -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Sedat Dilek @ 2010-07-09 0:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI Hi Rafael, On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:33 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: [...] Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16169 Subject : Complain from preemptive debug Submitter : Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> Date : 2010-05-31 10:10 (39 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTilTnAAZIizKinYsxFkNTkrmPqk6XJJuUjjhJ7EP@mail.gmail.com> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/31/77 Handled-By : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Patch : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01631.html https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/106555/ This bug is fixed Upstream [1]: commit 8c215bd3890c347dfb6a2db4779755f8b9c298a9 "sched: Cure nr_iowait_cpu() users" - Sedat - [1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=8c215bd3890c347dfb6a2db4779755f8b9c298a9 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (46 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 0:16 ` Sedat Dilek -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Sedat Dilek @ 2010-07-09 0:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki Hi Rafael, On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:33 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: [...] Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16169 Subject : Complain from preemptive debug Submitter : Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> Date : 2010-05-31 10:10 (39 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTilTnAAZIizKinYsxFkNTkrmPqk6XJJuUjjhJ7EP@mail.gmail.com> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/31/77 Handled-By : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Patch : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01631.html https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/106555/ This bug is fixed Upstream [1]: commit 8c215bd3890c347dfb6a2db4779755f8b9c298a9 "sched: Cure nr_iowait_cpu() users" - Sedat - [1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=8c215bd3890c347dfb6a2db4779755f8b9c298a9 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (47 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 0:16 ` Sedat Dilek -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Sedat Dilek @ 2010-07-09 0:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki Hi Rafael, On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:33 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: [...] Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16169 Subject : Complain from preemptive debug Submitter : Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> Date : 2010-05-31 10:10 (39 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTilTnAAZIizKinYsxFkNTkrmPqk6XJJuUjjhJ7EP@mail.gmail.com> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/31/77 Handled-By : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Patch : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01631.html https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/106555/ This bug is fixed Upstream [1]: commit 8c215bd3890c347dfb6a2db4779755f8b9c298a9 "sched: Cure nr_iowait_cpu() users" - Sedat - [1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=8c215bd3890c347dfb6a2db4779755f8b9c298a9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first -- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (48 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 0:48 ` Andrew Hendry -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Andrew Hendry @ 2010-07-09 0:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 Can be put down to bad ramdisk settings > actual memory, its probably not a regression. I think it can be closed for now, i'll do some testing and see if ramdisk should complain before letting such configuration go through. On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.34, > for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. > If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. > > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.34, please let us > know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know > if any of the entries below are invalid. > > Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply > to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling > the issue. > > > Listed regressions statistics: > > Date Total Pending Unresolved > ---------------------------------------- > 2010-07-09 79 45 37 > 2010-06-21 46 37 26 > 2010-06-09 15 13 10 > > > Unresolved regressions > ---------------------- > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 > Subject : 2.6.35 regression > Submitter : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old) > Message-ID : <loom.20100705T144459-919@post.gmane.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16346 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-04 22:04 (5 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTinof0k28rk4rMr66aubxcRL2rFa5ZEArj1lqD3o@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127828107815930&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337 > Subject : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP > Submitter : Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-03 22:59 (6 days old) > Message-ID : <4C2FC0E3.6050101@gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16334 > Subject : reiserfs locking (v2) > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-02 9:34 (7 days old) > Message-ID : <20100702093451.GA3973@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127806306303590&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16333 > Subject : iwl3945: HARDWARE GONE?? > Submitter : Priit Laes <plaes@plaes.org> > Date : 2010-07-02 16:02 (7 days old) > Message-ID : <1278086575.2889.8.camel@chi> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127808659705983&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16332 > Subject : Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open) > Submitter : werner@guyane.yi.org > Date : 2010-07-02 3:34 (7 days old) > Message-ID : <1278041650.12788@guyane.yi.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127804167511930&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16330 > Subject : Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3? > Submitter : Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> > Date : 2010-07-01 15:44 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <201007011744.19564.trenn@suse.de> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127799907218877&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16329 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3: Load average climbing to 3+ with no apparent reason: CPU 98% idle, with hardly no I/O > Submitter : Török Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-01 7:40 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <20100701104022.404410d6@debian> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127797005030536&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16324 > Subject : Oops while running fs_racer test on a POWER6 box against latest git > Submitter : divya <dipraksh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Date : 2010-06-30 11:34 (9 days old) > Message-ID : <4C2B28F3.7000006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127789697303061&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16323 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-01 12:21 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTini6hz2LFeZi8CMUmY3xw1MU7NxmyesuxZ4oCdo@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16322 > Subject : WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70() > Submitter : boris64 <bugzilla.kernel.org@boris64.net> > Date : 2010-07-01 13:54 (8 days old) > Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312 > Subject : WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty > Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-28 9:40 (11 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTin24fr5O4_q5Xbo9Y_NKkEmtcp6Hgmr9_4qXaFz@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127771804806465&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop > Submitter : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> > Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days old) > Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr@rogers.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16309 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 oops trying to suspend. > Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-27 12:40 (12 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTinUH2p33-AWxOVDrLsNkn9rgEVrlwn5mfK7P8NH@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127764249926781&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307 > Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (13 days old) > Message-ID : <4C26317A.5070309@postal.uv.es> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16306 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 cifs_show_options > Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-26 10:46 (13 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTilhTrEBYZd4HxeXQk8B6-yV8rCJ2C0jXsEREgIR@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127754922110501&w=2 > Handled-By : Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16304 > Subject : i915 - high number of wakeups > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > Date : 2010-06-27 09:52 (12 days old) > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16294 > Subject : [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver > Submitter : Kees Cook <kees@outflux.net> > Date : 2010-06-25 18:20 (14 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/f1befe71fa7a79ab733011b045639d8d809924ad > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16288 > Subject : kernel panic with iwlagn for Intel Wifi Link 5100 > Submitter : <yanshuang.zheng@intel.com> > Date : 2010-06-25 08:14 (14 days old) > Handled-By : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16284 > Subject : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code > Submitter : Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> > Date : 2010-06-23 12:57 (16 days old) > Message-ID : <20100623125740.GA3368@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127729789113432&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265 > Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? > Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> > Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (30 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c > Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb@closure.thunk.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16257 > Subject : sysfs changes break hwsim and bnep drivers > Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> > Date : 2010-06-20 11:23 (19 days old) > References : http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/162754 > Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> > Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16234 > Subject : [2.6.35-rc3] reboot mutex 'bug'... > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-14 15:16 (25 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTimDcTnyEPmt2ZcCM1UWtn4AYKotiqyjobJApkO7@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127652861118933&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16230 > Subject : inconsistent IN-HARDIRQ-W -> HARDIRQ-ON-W usage: fasync, 2.6.35-rc3 > Submitter : Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> > Date : 2010-06-13 9:53 (26 days old) > Message-ID : <20100613095305.GA13231@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127642282208277&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228 > Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) > Submitter : Brian Bloniarz <phunge0@hotmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (23 days old) > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-11 20:31 (28 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTim0jVRyqkwlGOcrg_XTvUQwcBYfWJX-aRzkkrLG@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16205 > Subject : acpi: freeing invalid memtype bf799000-bf79a000 > Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-09 20:09 (30 days old) > Message-ID : <20100609200910.GA2876@joi.lan> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611427029914&w=2 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127688398513862&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16201 > Subject : SIOCGIWFREQ ioctl fails to get frequency info > Submitter : nuh <nuh@mailinator.net> > Date : 2010-06-14 10:45 (25 days old) > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16199 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-07 18:14 (32 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTin2pPqOUx--9fIX3BH3e-cU6oCRufijcx_4ozx5@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127593447812015&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197 > Subject : [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' > Submitter : Ryan Wang <openspace.wang@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-07 0:23 (32 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTincwMZPnYW3S4uz4k2GOn52RpgBIBRfzyD010Yo@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127587022219378&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16187 > Subject : Carrier detection failed in dhcpcd when link is up > Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> > Date : 2010-06-12 15:15 (27 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/10708f37ae729baba9b67bd134c3720709d4ae62 > Handled-By : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184 > Subject : Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule > Submitter : Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp@safe.ca> > Date : 2010-06-12 04:17 (27 days old) > Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? > Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> > Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) > Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free > Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173 > Subject : After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs. > Submitter : David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net> > Date : 2010-06-09 23:25 (30 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632 > Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145 > Subject : Unable to boot unless "notsc" or "clocksource=hpet", or acpi_pad disabling the TSC > Submitter : Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> > Date : 2010-06-07 13:11 (32 days old) > Handled-By : Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com> > Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (35 days old) > Handled-By : Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> > > > Regressions with patches > ------------------------ > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16310 > Subject : arm omap invalid module format > Submitter : Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-28 17:30 (11 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/d0679c730395d0bde9a46939e7ba255b4ba7dd7c > Handled-By : Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> > Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26999 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16278 > Subject : lvm snapshot causes deadlock in 2.6.35 > Submitter : Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com> > Date : 2010-06-23 16:55 (16 days old) > Handled-By : Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> > Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26933 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16271 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 regression: IBM Maia system is unbootable [ACPI related?] > Submitter : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> > Date : 2010-06-21 16:03 (18 days old) > Message-ID : <1277136189.10998.63.camel@mulgrave.site> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127713622821166&w=2 > Handled-By : Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> > Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/108497/ > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16256 > Subject : tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34 > Submitter : Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> > Date : 2010-06-20 11:15 (19 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/225a9be24d799aa16d543c31fb09f0c9ed1d9caa > Handled-By : Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=tpmdd-devel&m=127609160616162&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16255 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 deadlocks on semaphore operations > Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> > Date : 2010-06-18 14:49 (21 days old) > Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.00.1006180940140.11575@router.home> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127687262727707&w=2 > Handled-By : Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127731055203402&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16232 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 - WARNING:iwl_set_dynamic_key > Submitter : Mario Guenterberg <mario.guenterberg@googlemail.com> > Date : 2010-06-14 11:55 (25 days old) > Message-ID : <20100614115510.GA7904@guenti-laptop> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127651695627147&w=2 > Handled-By : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> > Patch : http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/52893 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16215 > Subject : sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/class/net/bnep0' > Submitter : Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> > Date : 2010-06-15 14:55 (24 days old) > Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> > Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16215#c10 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16169 > Subject : Complain from preemptive debug > Submitter : Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> > Date : 2010-05-31 10:10 (39 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTilTnAAZIizKinYsxFkNTkrmPqk6XJJuUjjhJ7EP@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/31/77 > Handled-By : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> > Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > Patch : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01631.html > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/106555/ > > > For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in > references. > > As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. > There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.34, > unresolved as well as resolved, at: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16055 > > Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that > should be added to the list in there. > > Thanks! > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (49 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 0:48 ` Andrew Hendry -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Andrew Hendry @ 2010-07-09 0:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 Can be put down to bad ramdisk settings > actual memory, its probably not a regression. I think it can be closed for now, i'll do some testing and see if ramdisk should complain before letting such configuration go through. On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.34, > for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. > If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. > > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.34, please let us > know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know > if any of the entries below are invalid. > > Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply > to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling > the issue. > > > Listed regressions statistics: > > Date Total Pending Unresolved > ---------------------------------------- > 2010-07-09 79 45 37 > 2010-06-21 46 37 26 > 2010-06-09 15 13 10 > > > Unresolved regressions > ---------------------- > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 > Subject : 2.6.35 regression > Submitter : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old) > Message-ID : <loom.20100705T144459-919@post.gmane.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16346 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-04 22:04 (5 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTinof0k28rk4rMr66aubxcRL2rFa5ZEArj1lqD3o@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127828107815930&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337 > Subject : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP > Submitter : Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-03 22:59 (6 days old) > Message-ID : <4C2FC0E3.6050101@gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16334 > Subject : reiserfs locking (v2) > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-02 9:34 (7 days old) > Message-ID : <20100702093451.GA3973@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127806306303590&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16333 > Subject : iwl3945: HARDWARE GONE?? > Submitter : Priit Laes <plaes@plaes.org> > Date : 2010-07-02 16:02 (7 days old) > Message-ID : <1278086575.2889.8.camel@chi> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127808659705983&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16332 > Subject : Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open) > Submitter : werner@guyane.yi.org > Date : 2010-07-02 3:34 (7 days old) > Message-ID : <1278041650.12788@guyane.yi.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127804167511930&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16330 > Subject : Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3? > Submitter : Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> > Date : 2010-07-01 15:44 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <201007011744.19564.trenn@suse.de> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127799907218877&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16329 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3: Load average climbing to 3+ with no apparent reason: CPU 98% idle, with hardly no I/O > Submitter : Török Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-01 7:40 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <20100701104022.404410d6@debian> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127797005030536&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16324 > Subject : Oops while running fs_racer test on a POWER6 box against latest git > Submitter : divya <dipraksh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Date : 2010-06-30 11:34 (9 days old) > Message-ID : <4C2B28F3.7000006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127789697303061&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16323 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-01 12:21 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTini6hz2LFeZi8CMUmY3xw1MU7NxmyesuxZ4oCdo@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16322 > Subject : WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70() > Submitter : boris64 <bugzilla.kernel.org@boris64.net> > Date : 2010-07-01 13:54 (8 days old) > Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312 > Subject : WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty > Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-28 9:40 (11 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTin24fr5O4_q5Xbo9Y_NKkEmtcp6Hgmr9_4qXaFz@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127771804806465&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop > Submitter : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> > Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days old) > Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr@rogers.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16309 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 oops trying to suspend. > Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-27 12:40 (12 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTinUH2p33-AWxOVDrLsNkn9rgEVrlwn5mfK7P8NH@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127764249926781&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307 > Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (13 days old) > Message-ID : <4C26317A.5070309@postal.uv.es> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16306 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 cifs_show_options > Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-26 10:46 (13 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTilhTrEBYZd4HxeXQk8B6-yV8rCJ2C0jXsEREgIR@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127754922110501&w=2 > Handled-By : Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16304 > Subject : i915 - high number of wakeups > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > Date : 2010-06-27 09:52 (12 days old) > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16294 > Subject : [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver > Submitter : Kees Cook <kees@outflux.net> > Date : 2010-06-25 18:20 (14 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/f1befe71fa7a79ab733011b045639d8d809924ad > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16288 > Subject : kernel panic with iwlagn for Intel Wifi Link 5100 > Submitter : <yanshuang.zheng@intel.com> > Date : 2010-06-25 08:14 (14 days old) > Handled-By : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16284 > Subject : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code > Submitter : Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> > Date : 2010-06-23 12:57 (16 days old) > Message-ID : <20100623125740.GA3368@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127729789113432&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265 > Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? > Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> > Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (30 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c > Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb@closure.thunk.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16257 > Subject : sysfs changes break hwsim and bnep drivers > Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> > Date : 2010-06-20 11:23 (19 days old) > References : http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/162754 > Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> > Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16234 > Subject : [2.6.35-rc3] reboot mutex 'bug'... > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-14 15:16 (25 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTimDcTnyEPmt2ZcCM1UWtn4AYKotiqyjobJApkO7@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127652861118933&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16230 > Subject : inconsistent IN-HARDIRQ-W -> HARDIRQ-ON-W usage: fasync, 2.6.35-rc3 > Submitter : Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> > Date : 2010-06-13 9:53 (26 days old) > Message-ID : <20100613095305.GA13231@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127642282208277&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228 > Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) > Submitter : Brian Bloniarz <phunge0@hotmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (23 days old) > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-11 20:31 (28 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTim0jVRyqkwlGOcrg_XTvUQwcBYfWJX-aRzkkrLG@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16205 > Subject : acpi: freeing invalid memtype bf799000-bf79a000 > Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-09 20:09 (30 days old) > Message-ID : <20100609200910.GA2876@joi.lan> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611427029914&w=2 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127688398513862&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16201 > Subject : SIOCGIWFREQ ioctl fails to get frequency info > Submitter : nuh <nuh@mailinator.net> > Date : 2010-06-14 10:45 (25 days old) > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16199 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-07 18:14 (32 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTin2pPqOUx--9fIX3BH3e-cU6oCRufijcx_4ozx5@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127593447812015&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197 > Subject : [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' > Submitter : Ryan Wang <openspace.wang@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-07 0:23 (32 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTincwMZPnYW3S4uz4k2GOn52RpgBIBRfzyD010Yo@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127587022219378&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16187 > Subject : Carrier detection failed in dhcpcd when link is up > Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> > Date : 2010-06-12 15:15 (27 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/10708f37ae729baba9b67bd134c3720709d4ae62 > Handled-By : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184 > Subject : Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule > Submitter : Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp@safe.ca> > Date : 2010-06-12 04:17 (27 days old) > Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? > Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> > Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) > Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free > Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173 > Subject : After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs. > Submitter : David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net> > Date : 2010-06-09 23:25 (30 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632 > Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145 > Subject : Unable to boot unless "notsc" or "clocksource=hpet", or acpi_pad disabling the TSC > Submitter : Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> > Date : 2010-06-07 13:11 (32 days old) > Handled-By : Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com> > Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (35 days old) > Handled-By : Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> > > > Regressions with patches > ------------------------ > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16310 > Subject : arm omap invalid module format > Submitter : Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-28 17:30 (11 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/d0679c730395d0bde9a46939e7ba255b4ba7dd7c > Handled-By : Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> > Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26999 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16278 > Subject : lvm snapshot causes deadlock in 2.6.35 > Submitter : Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com> > Date : 2010-06-23 16:55 (16 days old) > Handled-By : Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> > Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26933 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16271 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 regression: IBM Maia system is unbootable [ACPI related?] > Submitter : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> > Date : 2010-06-21 16:03 (18 days old) > Message-ID : <1277136189.10998.63.camel@mulgrave.site> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127713622821166&w=2 > Handled-By : Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> > Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/108497/ > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16256 > Subject : tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34 > Submitter : Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> > Date : 2010-06-20 11:15 (19 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/225a9be24d799aa16d543c31fb09f0c9ed1d9caa > Handled-By : Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=tpmdd-devel&m=127609160616162&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16255 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 deadlocks on semaphore operations > Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> > Date : 2010-06-18 14:49 (21 days old) > Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.00.1006180940140.11575@router.home> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127687262727707&w=2 > Handled-By : Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127731055203402&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16232 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 - WARNING:iwl_set_dynamic_key > Submitter : Mario Guenterberg <mario.guenterberg@googlemail.com> > Date : 2010-06-14 11:55 (25 days old) > Message-ID : <20100614115510.GA7904@guenti-laptop> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127651695627147&w=2 > Handled-By : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> > Patch : http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/52893 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16215 > Subject : sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/class/net/bnep0' > Submitter : Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> > Date : 2010-06-15 14:55 (24 days old) > Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> > Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16215#c10 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16169 > Subject : Complain from preemptive debug > Submitter : Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> > Date : 2010-05-31 10:10 (39 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTilTnAAZIizKinYsxFkNTkrmPqk6XJJuUjjhJ7EP@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/31/77 > Handled-By : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> > Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > Patch : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01631.html > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/106555/ > > > For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in > references. > > As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. > There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.34, > unresolved as well as resolved, at: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16055 > > Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that > should be added to the list in there. > > Thanks! > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first -- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (50 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 0:48 ` Andrew Hendry -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Andrew Hendry @ 2010-07-09 0:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 Can be put down to bad ramdisk settings > actual memory, its probably not a regression. I think it can be closed for now, i'll do some testing and see if ramdisk should complain before letting such configuration go through. On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.34, > for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. > If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. > > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.34, please let us > know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know > if any of the entries below are invalid. > > Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply > to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling > the issue. > > > Listed regressions statistics: > > Date Total Pending Unresolved > ---------------------------------------- > 2010-07-09 79 45 37 > 2010-06-21 46 37 26 > 2010-06-09 15 13 10 > > > Unresolved regressions > ---------------------- > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 > Subject : 2.6.35 regression > Submitter : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old) > Message-ID : <loom.20100705T144459-919@post.gmane.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16346 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-04 22:04 (5 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTinof0k28rk4rMr66aubxcRL2rFa5ZEArj1lqD3o@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127828107815930&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337 > Subject : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP > Submitter : Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-03 22:59 (6 days old) > Message-ID : <4C2FC0E3.6050101@gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16334 > Subject : reiserfs locking (v2) > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-02 9:34 (7 days old) > Message-ID : <20100702093451.GA3973@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127806306303590&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16333 > Subject : iwl3945: HARDWARE GONE?? > Submitter : Priit Laes <plaes@plaes.org> > Date : 2010-07-02 16:02 (7 days old) > Message-ID : <1278086575.2889.8.camel@chi> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127808659705983&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16332 > Subject : Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open) > Submitter : werner@guyane.yi.org > Date : 2010-07-02 3:34 (7 days old) > Message-ID : <1278041650.12788@guyane.yi.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127804167511930&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16330 > Subject : Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3? > Submitter : Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> > Date : 2010-07-01 15:44 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <201007011744.19564.trenn@suse.de> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127799907218877&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16329 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3: Load average climbing to 3+ with no apparent reason: CPU 98% idle, with hardly no I/O > Submitter : Török Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-01 7:40 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <20100701104022.404410d6@debian> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127797005030536&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16324 > Subject : Oops while running fs_racer test on a POWER6 box against latest git > Submitter : divya <dipraksh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Date : 2010-06-30 11:34 (9 days old) > Message-ID : <4C2B28F3.7000006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127789697303061&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16323 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-01 12:21 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTini6hz2LFeZi8CMUmY3xw1MU7NxmyesuxZ4oCdo@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16322 > Subject : WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70() > Submitter : boris64 <bugzilla.kernel.org@boris64.net> > Date : 2010-07-01 13:54 (8 days old) > Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312 > Subject : WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty > Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-28 9:40 (11 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTin24fr5O4_q5Xbo9Y_NKkEmtcp6Hgmr9_4qXaFz@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127771804806465&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop > Submitter : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> > Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days old) > Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr@rogers.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16309 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 oops trying to suspend. > Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-27 12:40 (12 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTinUH2p33-AWxOVDrLsNkn9rgEVrlwn5mfK7P8NH@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127764249926781&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307 > Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (13 days old) > Message-ID : <4C26317A.5070309@postal.uv.es> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16306 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 cifs_show_options > Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-26 10:46 (13 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTilhTrEBYZd4HxeXQk8B6-yV8rCJ2C0jXsEREgIR@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127754922110501&w=2 > Handled-By : Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16304 > Subject : i915 - high number of wakeups > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > Date : 2010-06-27 09:52 (12 days old) > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16294 > Subject : [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver > Submitter : Kees Cook <kees@outflux.net> > Date : 2010-06-25 18:20 (14 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/f1befe71fa7a79ab733011b045639d8d809924ad > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16288 > Subject : kernel panic with iwlagn for Intel Wifi Link 5100 > Submitter : <yanshuang.zheng@intel.com> > Date : 2010-06-25 08:14 (14 days old) > Handled-By : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16284 > Subject : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code > Submitter : Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> > Date : 2010-06-23 12:57 (16 days old) > Message-ID : <20100623125740.GA3368@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127729789113432&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265 > Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? > Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> > Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (30 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c > Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb@closure.thunk.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16257 > Subject : sysfs changes break hwsim and bnep drivers > Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> > Date : 2010-06-20 11:23 (19 days old) > References : http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/162754 > Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> > Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16234 > Subject : [2.6.35-rc3] reboot mutex 'bug'... > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-14 15:16 (25 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTimDcTnyEPmt2ZcCM1UWtn4AYKotiqyjobJApkO7@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127652861118933&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16230 > Subject : inconsistent IN-HARDIRQ-W -> HARDIRQ-ON-W usage: fasync, 2.6.35-rc3 > Submitter : Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> > Date : 2010-06-13 9:53 (26 days old) > Message-ID : <20100613095305.GA13231@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127642282208277&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228 > Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) > Submitter : Brian Bloniarz <phunge0@hotmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (23 days old) > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-11 20:31 (28 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTim0jVRyqkwlGOcrg_XTvUQwcBYfWJX-aRzkkrLG@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16205 > Subject : acpi: freeing invalid memtype bf799000-bf79a000 > Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-09 20:09 (30 days old) > Message-ID : <20100609200910.GA2876@joi.lan> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611427029914&w=2 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127688398513862&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16201 > Subject : SIOCGIWFREQ ioctl fails to get frequency info > Submitter : nuh <nuh@mailinator.net> > Date : 2010-06-14 10:45 (25 days old) > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16199 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-07 18:14 (32 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTin2pPqOUx--9fIX3BH3e-cU6oCRufijcx_4ozx5@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127593447812015&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197 > Subject : [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' > Submitter : Ryan Wang <openspace.wang@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-07 0:23 (32 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTincwMZPnYW3S4uz4k2GOn52RpgBIBRfzyD010Yo@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127587022219378&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16187 > Subject : Carrier detection failed in dhcpcd when link is up > Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> > Date : 2010-06-12 15:15 (27 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/10708f37ae729baba9b67bd134c3720709d4ae62 > Handled-By : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184 > Subject : Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule > Submitter : Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp@safe.ca> > Date : 2010-06-12 04:17 (27 days old) > Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? > Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> > Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) > Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free > Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173 > Subject : After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs. > Submitter : David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net> > Date : 2010-06-09 23:25 (30 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632 > Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145 > Subject : Unable to boot unless "notsc" or "clocksource=hpet", or acpi_pad disabling the TSC > Submitter : Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> > Date : 2010-06-07 13:11 (32 days old) > Handled-By : Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com> > Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (35 days old) > Handled-By : Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> > > > Regressions with patches > ------------------------ > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16310 > Subject : arm omap invalid module format > Submitter : Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-28 17:30 (11 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/d0679c730395d0bde9a46939e7ba255b4ba7dd7c > Handled-By : Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> > Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26999 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16278 > Subject : lvm snapshot causes deadlock in 2.6.35 > Submitter : Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com> > Date : 2010-06-23 16:55 (16 days old) > Handled-By : Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> > Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26933 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16271 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 regression: IBM Maia system is unbootable [ACPI related?] > Submitter : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> > Date : 2010-06-21 16:03 (18 days old) > Message-ID : <1277136189.10998.63.camel@mulgrave.site> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127713622821166&w=2 > Handled-By : Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> > Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/108497/ > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16256 > Subject : tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34 > Submitter : Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> > Date : 2010-06-20 11:15 (19 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/225a9be24d799aa16d543c31fb09f0c9ed1d9caa > Handled-By : Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=tpmdd-devel&m=127609160616162&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16255 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 deadlocks on semaphore operations > Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> > Date : 2010-06-18 14:49 (21 days old) > Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.00.1006180940140.11575@router.home> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127687262727707&w=2 > Handled-By : Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127731055203402&w=2 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16232 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 - WARNING:iwl_set_dynamic_key > Submitter : Mario Guenterberg <mario.guenterberg@googlemail.com> > Date : 2010-06-14 11:55 (25 days old) > Message-ID : <20100614115510.GA7904@guenti-laptop> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127651695627147&w=2 > Handled-By : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> > Patch : http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/52893 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16215 > Subject : sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/class/net/bnep0' > Submitter : Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> > Date : 2010-06-15 14:55 (24 days old) > Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> > Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16215#c10 > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16169 > Subject : Complain from preemptive debug > Submitter : Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> > Date : 2010-05-31 10:10 (39 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTilTnAAZIizKinYsxFkNTkrmPqk6XJJuUjjhJ7EP@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/31/77 > Handled-By : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> > Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > Patch : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01631.html > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/106555/ > > > For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in > references. > > As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. > There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.34, > unresolved as well as resolved, at: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16055 > > Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that > should be added to the list in there. > > Thanks! > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (51 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-07-09 1:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Jens Axboe, DRI, Linux SCSI List, Patrick McHardy, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Jesse Barnes, David S. Miller, Linux ACPI, Al Viro, Frederic Weisbecker, Dave Airlie, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Shawn Starr, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > Unresolved regressions > ---------------------- > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 > Subject : 2.6.35 regression > Submitter : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old) > Message-ID : <loom.20100705T144459-919@post.gmane.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2 This is a gcc-4.5 issue. Whether it's also something that we should change in the kernel is unclear, but at least as of now, the rule is that you cannot compile the kernel with gcc-4.5. No idea whether the compiler is just entirely broken, or whether it's just that it triggers something iffy by being overly clever. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16346 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-04 22:04 (5 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTinof0k28rk4rMr66aubxcRL2rFa5ZEArj1lqD3o@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127828107815930&w=2 I'm not entirely sure if these RCU proving things should count as regressions. Sure, the option to enable RCU proving is new, but the things it reports about generally are not new - and they are usually not even bugs in the sense that they necessarily cause any real problems. That particular one is in the single-thread optimizated case for fget_light, ie if (likely((atomic_read(&files->count) == 1))) { file = fcheck_files(files, fd); where I think it should be entirely safe in all ways without any locking. So I think it's a false positive too. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16334 > Subject : reiserfs locking (v2) > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-02 9:34 (7 days old) > Message-ID : <20100702093451.GA3973@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127806306303590&w=2 Frederic? Al? I assume this is some late fallout from the BKL removal ages ago.. It's the old filldir-vs-mmap crud, but normally it should be impossible to trigger because the inode for a directory should never be mmap'able, so we should never have the same i_mutex lock used for both mmap and for filldir protection. We saw some of that oddity long ago, I wonder if it's lockdep being confused about some inodes. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16333 > Subject : iwl3945: HARDWARE GONE?? > Submitter : Priit Laes <plaes@plaes.org> > Date : 2010-07-02 16:02 (7 days old) > Message-ID : <1278086575.2889.8.camel@chi> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127808659705983&w=2 This either got fixed, or will be practically impossible to debug. The reporter ends up being unable to reproduce the issue. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16332 > Subject : Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open) > Submitter : werner@guyane.yi.org > Date : 2010-07-02 3:34 (7 days old) > Message-ID : <1278041650.12788@guyane.yi.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127804167511930&w=2 This seems to be due to CONFIG_MRST (Moorestown). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16330 > Subject : Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3? > Submitter : Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> > Date : 2010-07-01 15:44 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <201007011744.19564.trenn@suse.de> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127799907218877&w=2 There's a suggested patch in http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127862524404291&w=2 but no reply to it yet. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16329 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3: Load average climbing to 3+ with no apparent reason: CPU 98% idle, with hardly no I/O > Submitter : Török Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-01 7:40 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <20100701104022.404410d6@debian> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127797005030536&w=2 This seems to be partly a confusion about what "load average" is. It's not a CPU load, it's a system load average, and disk-wait processes count towards it. He has some problem with his CD-ROM, and it sounds like it might be hardware on the verge of going bad. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16324 > Subject : Oops while running fs_racer test on a POWER6 box against latest git > Submitter : divya <dipraksh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Date : 2010-06-30 11:34 (9 days old) > Message-ID : <4C2B28F3.7000006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127789697303061&w=2 I wonder if this is the writeback problem. That POWER crash dump is unreadable, so it's hard to tell, but the load in question makes that at least likely. If so, it should hopefully be fixed in today's git (commit 83ba7b071f30f7c01f72518ad72d5cd203c27502 and friends). > Bug-entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16323 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-01 12:21 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTini6hz2LFeZi8CMUmY3xw1MU7NxmyesuxZ4oCdo@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2 See earlier about these being marked as regressions, but it should be fixed by commit dc61b1d6 ("sched: Fix PROVE_RCU vs cpu_cgroup"). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16322 > Subject : WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70() > Submitter : boris64 <bugzilla.kernel.org@boris64.net> > Date : 2010-07-01 13:54 (8 days old) > Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Magic. Strange and dark magic. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop > Submitter : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> > Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days old) > Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr@rogers.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 I think this might be usefully bisected. Shawn? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16309 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 oops trying to suspend. > Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-27 12:40 (12 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTinUH2p33-AWxOVDrLsNkn9rgEVrlwn5mfK7P8NH@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127764249926781&w=2 I'm pretty sure this was fixed by Nick in commit 57439f878afa ("fs: fix superblock iteration race"). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307 > Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (13 days old) > Message-ID : <4C26317A.5070309@postal.uv.es> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2 I don't think anybody noticed this one. Jesse? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16304 > Subject : i915 - high number of wakeups > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > Date : 2010-06-27 09:52 (12 days old) Duplicate of that 16307 one. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16284 > Subject : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code > Submitter : Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> > Date : 2010-06-23 12:57 (16 days old) > Message-ID : <20100623125740.GA3368@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127729789113432&w=2 This has "I have a fix, will post it very soon." in the thread from Frederic, but I'm not seeing anything else. Frederic? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265 > Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? > Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> > Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (30 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c > Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb@closure.thunk.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4 Dave, Jesse? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16234 > Subject : [2.6.35-rc3] reboot mutex 'bug'... > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-14 15:16 (25 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTimDcTnyEPmt2ZcCM1UWtn4AYKotiqyjobJApkO7@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127652861118933&w=2 Ok, this is definitely harmless. Whether we should silence the warning somehow is a separate question. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16230 > Subject : inconsistent IN-HARDIRQ-W -> HARDIRQ-ON-W usage: fasync, 2.6.35-rc3 > Submitter : Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> > Date : 2010-06-13 9:53 (26 days old) > Message-ID : <20100613095305.GA13231@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127642282208277&w=2 Fixed by commit f4985dc714d7. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228 > Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) > Submitter : Brian Bloniarz <phunge0@hotmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (23 days old) > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> This has a butt-ugly suggested patch that certainly won't be applied. I saw the thread, but lost sight of it. Jesse, did that end up with some resolution? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-11 20:31 (28 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTim0jVRyqkwlGOcrg_XTvUQwcBYfWJX-aRzkkrLG@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2 I dunno. Old, and apparently seen by two people. Dave? Might be helped by bisection. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16205 > Subject : acpi: freeing invalid memtype bf799000-bf79a000 > Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-09 20:09 (30 days old) > Message-ID : <20100609200910.GA2876@joi.lan> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611427029914&w=2 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127688398513862&w=2 This should be fixed by commit b945d6b2554d ("rbtree: Undo augmented trees performance damage and regression"). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16199 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-07 18:14 (32 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTin2pPqOUx--9fIX3BH3e-cU6oCRufijcx_4ozx5@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127593447812015&w=2 Another RCU proving thing. And this one looks the same as the 16323 one above, and fixed by the same commit as that one. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197 > Subject : [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' > Submitter : Ryan Wang <openspace.wang@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-07 0:23 (32 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTincwMZPnYW3S4uz4k2GOn52RpgBIBRfzyD010Yo@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127587022219378&w=2 These should all be gone. See commit 3be434f0244ee by Jesse ('Revert "PCI: create function symlinks in /sys/bus/pci/slots/N/"'). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16187 > Subject : Carrier detection failed in dhcpcd when link is up > Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> > Date : 2010-06-12 15:15 (27 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/10708f37ae729baba9b67bd134c3720709d4ae62 > Handled-By : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> David? This bisects to a networking commit. Doesn't look sensible, but what do I know? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184 > Subject : Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule > Submitter : Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp@safe.ca> > Date : 2010-06-12 04:17 (27 days old) > Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Patrick, Davem? Ping? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? > Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> > Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) > Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 Hmm. That one is the vt.c bug coupled with another problem, which in turn got opened as a separate bugzilla entry: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16252 which in turn then got closed. I dunno. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free > Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 Not a regression or a kernel bug at all. See the thread. Big ramdisk filled up all of memory when it was filled by the builds. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145 > Subject : Unable to boot unless "notsc" or "clocksource=hpet", or acpi_pad disabling the TSC > Submitter : Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> > Date : 2010-06-07 13:11 (32 days old) > Handled-By : Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com> > Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> This is not a regression. See the full bugzilla details. The same problem persists at least back to 2.6.30 with his config. So it's somehow specific to his particular config use that requires "notsc" to boot. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (35 days old) > Handled-By : Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> This looks like a duplicate of that 16312 bugzilla entry. Jens, has this been resolved? Linus ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first -- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (?) @ 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-07-09 1:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI, Frederic Weisbecker, Al Viro, Shawn Starr, Jesse Barnes, Dave Airlie, David S. Miller, Patrick McHardy, Jens Axboe On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > Unresolved regressions > ---------------------- > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 > Subject : 2.6.35 regression > Submitter : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old) > Message-ID : <loom.20100705T144459-919@post.gmane.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2 This is a gcc-4.5 issue. Whether it's also something that we should change in the kernel is unclear, but at least as of now, the rule is that you cannot compile the kernel with gcc-4.5. No idea whether the compiler is just entirely broken, or whether it's just that it triggers something iffy by being overly clever. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16346 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-04 22:04 (5 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTinof0k28rk4rMr66aubxcRL2rFa5ZEArj1lqD3o@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127828107815930&w=2 I'm not entirely sure if these RCU proving things should count as regressions. Sure, the option to enable RCU proving is new, but the things it reports about generally are not new - and they are usually not even bugs in the sense that they necessarily cause any real problems. That particular one is in the single-thread optimizated case for fget_light, ie if (likely((atomic_read(&files->count) == 1))) { file = fcheck_files(files, fd); where I think it should be entirely safe in all ways without any locking. So I think it's a false positive too. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16334 > Subject : reiserfs locking (v2) > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-02 9:34 (7 days old) > Message-ID : <20100702093451.GA3973@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127806306303590&w=2 Frederic? Al? I assume this is some late fallout from the BKL removal ages ago.. It's the old filldir-vs-mmap crud, but normally it should be impossible to trigger because the inode for a directory should never be mmap'able, so we should never have the same i_mutex lock used for both mmap and for filldir protection. We saw some of that oddity long ago, I wonder if it's lockdep being confused about some inodes. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16333 > Subject : iwl3945: HARDWARE GONE?? > Submitter : Priit Laes <plaes@plaes.org> > Date : 2010-07-02 16:02 (7 days old) > Message-ID : <1278086575.2889.8.camel@chi> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127808659705983&w=2 This either got fixed, or will be practically impossible to debug. The reporter ends up being unable to reproduce the issue. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16332 > Subject : Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open) > Submitter : werner@guyane.yi.org > Date : 2010-07-02 3:34 (7 days old) > Message-ID : <1278041650.12788@guyane.yi.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127804167511930&w=2 This seems to be due to CONFIG_MRST (Moorestown). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16330 > Subject : Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3? > Submitter : Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> > Date : 2010-07-01 15:44 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <201007011744.19564.trenn@suse.de> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127799907218877&w=2 There's a suggested patch in http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127862524404291&w=2 but no reply to it yet. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16329 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3: Load average climbing to 3+ with no apparent reason: CPU 98% idle, with hardly no I/O > Submitter : Török Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-01 7:40 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <20100701104022.404410d6@debian> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127797005030536&w=2 This seems to be partly a confusion about what "load average" is. It's not a CPU load, it's a system load average, and disk-wait processes count towards it. He has some problem with his CD-ROM, and it sounds like it might be hardware on the verge of going bad. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16324 > Subject : Oops while running fs_racer test on a POWER6 box against latest git > Submitter : divya <dipraksh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Date : 2010-06-30 11:34 (9 days old) > Message-ID : <4C2B28F3.7000006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127789697303061&w=2 I wonder if this is the writeback problem. That POWER crash dump is unreadable, so it's hard to tell, but the load in question makes that at least likely. If so, it should hopefully be fixed in today's git (commit 83ba7b071f30f7c01f72518ad72d5cd203c27502 and friends). > Bug-entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16323 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-01 12:21 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTini6hz2LFeZi8CMUmY3xw1MU7NxmyesuxZ4oCdo@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2 See earlier about these being marked as regressions, but it should be fixed by commit dc61b1d6 ("sched: Fix PROVE_RCU vs cpu_cgroup"). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16322 > Subject : WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70() > Submitter : boris64 <bugzilla.kernel.org@boris64.net> > Date : 2010-07-01 13:54 (8 days old) > Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Magic. Strange and dark magic. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop > Submitter : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> > Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days old) > Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr@rogers.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 I think this might be usefully bisected. Shawn? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16309 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 oops trying to suspend. > Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-27 12:40 (12 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTinUH2p33-AWxOVDrLsNkn9rgEVrlwn5mfK7P8NH@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127764249926781&w=2 I'm pretty sure this was fixed by Nick in commit 57439f878afa ("fs: fix superblock iteration race"). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307 > Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (13 days old) > Message-ID : <4C26317A.5070309@postal.uv.es> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2 I don't think anybody noticed this one. Jesse? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16304 > Subject : i915 - high number of wakeups > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > Date : 2010-06-27 09:52 (12 days old) Duplicate of that 16307 one. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16284 > Subject : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code > Submitter : Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> > Date : 2010-06-23 12:57 (16 days old) > Message-ID : <20100623125740.GA3368@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127729789113432&w=2 This has "I have a fix, will post it very soon." in the thread from Frederic, but I'm not seeing anything else. Frederic? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265 > Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? > Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> > Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (30 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c > Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb@closure.thunk.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4 Dave, Jesse? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16234 > Subject : [2.6.35-rc3] reboot mutex 'bug'... > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-14 15:16 (25 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTimDcTnyEPmt2ZcCM1UWtn4AYKotiqyjobJApkO7@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127652861118933&w=2 Ok, this is definitely harmless. Whether we should silence the warning somehow is a separate question. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16230 > Subject : inconsistent IN-HARDIRQ-W -> HARDIRQ-ON-W usage: fasync, 2.6.35-rc3 > Submitter : Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> > Date : 2010-06-13 9:53 (26 days old) > Message-ID : <20100613095305.GA13231@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127642282208277&w=2 Fixed by commit f4985dc714d7. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228 > Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) > Submitter : Brian Bloniarz <phunge0@hotmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (23 days old) > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> This has a butt-ugly suggested patch that certainly won't be applied. I saw the thread, but lost sight of it. Jesse, did that end up with some resolution? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-11 20:31 (28 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTim0jVRyqkwlGOcrg_XTvUQwcBYfWJX-aRzkkrLG@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2 I dunno. Old, and apparently seen by two people. Dave? Might be helped by bisection. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16205 > Subject : acpi: freeing invalid memtype bf799000-bf79a000 > Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-09 20:09 (30 days old) > Message-ID : <20100609200910.GA2876@joi.lan> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611427029914&w=2 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127688398513862&w=2 This should be fixed by commit b945d6b2554d ("rbtree: Undo augmented trees performance damage and regression"). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16199 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-07 18:14 (32 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTin2pPqOUx--9fIX3BH3e-cU6oCRufijcx_4ozx5@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127593447812015&w=2 Another RCU proving thing. And this one looks the same as the 16323 one above, and fixed by the same commit as that one. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197 > Subject : [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' > Submitter : Ryan Wang <openspace.wang@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-07 0:23 (32 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTincwMZPnYW3S4uz4k2GOn52RpgBIBRfzyD010Yo@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127587022219378&w=2 These should all be gone. See commit 3be434f0244ee by Jesse ('Revert "PCI: create function symlinks in /sys/bus/pci/slots/N/"'). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16187 > Subject : Carrier detection failed in dhcpcd when link is up > Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> > Date : 2010-06-12 15:15 (27 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/10708f37ae729baba9b67bd134c3720709d4ae62 > Handled-By : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> David? This bisects to a networking commit. Doesn't look sensible, but what do I know? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184 > Subject : Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule > Submitter : Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp@safe.ca> > Date : 2010-06-12 04:17 (27 days old) > Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Patrick, Davem? Ping? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? > Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> > Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) > Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 Hmm. That one is the vt.c bug coupled with another problem, which in turn got opened as a separate bugzilla entry: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16252 which in turn then got closed. I dunno. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free > Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 Not a regression or a kernel bug at all. See the thread. Big ramdisk filled up all of memory when it was filled by the builds. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145 > Subject : Unable to boot unless "notsc" or "clocksource=hpet", or acpi_pad disabling the TSC > Submitter : Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> > Date : 2010-06-07 13:11 (32 days old) > Handled-By : Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com> > Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> This is not a regression. See the full bugzilla details. The same problem persists at least back to 2.6.30 with his config. So it's somehow specific to his particular config use that requires "notsc" to boot. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (35 days old) > Handled-By : Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> This looks like a duplicate of that 16312 bugzilla entry. Jens, has this been resolved? Linus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-07-09 1:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Jens Axboe, DRI, Linux SCSI List, Patrick McHardy, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Jesse Barnes, David S. Miller, Linux ACPI, Al Viro, Frederic Weisbecker, Dave Airlie, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Shawn Starr, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > Unresolved regressions > ---------------------- > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 > Subject : 2.6.35 regression > Submitter : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old) > Message-ID : <loom.20100705T144459-919@post.gmane.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2 This is a gcc-4.5 issue. Whether it's also something that we should change in the kernel is unclear, but at least as of now, the rule is that you cannot compile the kernel with gcc-4.5. No idea whether the compiler is just entirely broken, or whether it's just that it triggers something iffy by being overly clever. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16346 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-04 22:04 (5 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTinof0k28rk4rMr66aubxcRL2rFa5ZEArj1lqD3o@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127828107815930&w=2 I'm not entirely sure if these RCU proving things should count as regressions. Sure, the option to enable RCU proving is new, but the things it reports about generally are not new - and they are usually not even bugs in the sense that they necessarily cause any real problems. That particular one is in the single-thread optimizated case for fget_light, ie if (likely((atomic_read(&files->count) == 1))) { file = fcheck_files(files, fd); where I think it should be entirely safe in all ways without any locking. So I think it's a false positive too. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16334 > Subject : reiserfs locking (v2) > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-02 9:34 (7 days old) > Message-ID : <20100702093451.GA3973@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127806306303590&w=2 Frederic? Al? I assume this is some late fallout from the BKL removal ages ago.. It's the old filldir-vs-mmap crud, but normally it should be impossible to trigger because the inode for a directory should never be mmap'able, so we should never have the same i_mutex lock used for both mmap and for filldir protection. We saw some of that oddity long ago, I wonder if it's lockdep being confused about some inodes. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16333 > Subject : iwl3945: HARDWARE GONE?? > Submitter : Priit Laes <plaes@plaes.org> > Date : 2010-07-02 16:02 (7 days old) > Message-ID : <1278086575.2889.8.camel@chi> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127808659705983&w=2 This either got fixed, or will be practically impossible to debug. The reporter ends up being unable to reproduce the issue. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16332 > Subject : Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open) > Submitter : werner@guyane.yi.org > Date : 2010-07-02 3:34 (7 days old) > Message-ID : <1278041650.12788@guyane.yi.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127804167511930&w=2 This seems to be due to CONFIG_MRST (Moorestown). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16330 > Subject : Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3? > Submitter : Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> > Date : 2010-07-01 15:44 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <201007011744.19564.trenn@suse.de> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127799907218877&w=2 There's a suggested patch in http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127862524404291&w=2 but no reply to it yet. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16329 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3: Load average climbing to 3+ with no apparent reason: CPU 98% idle, with hardly no I/O > Submitter : Török Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-01 7:40 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <20100701104022.404410d6@debian> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127797005030536&w=2 This seems to be partly a confusion about what "load average" is. It's not a CPU load, it's a system load average, and disk-wait processes count towards it. He has some problem with his CD-ROM, and it sounds like it might be hardware on the verge of going bad. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16324 > Subject : Oops while running fs_racer test on a POWER6 box against latest git > Submitter : divya <dipraksh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Date : 2010-06-30 11:34 (9 days old) > Message-ID : <4C2B28F3.7000006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127789697303061&w=2 I wonder if this is the writeback problem. That POWER crash dump is unreadable, so it's hard to tell, but the load in question makes that at least likely. If so, it should hopefully be fixed in today's git (commit 83ba7b071f30f7c01f72518ad72d5cd203c27502 and friends). > Bug-entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16323 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-01 12:21 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTini6hz2LFeZi8CMUmY3xw1MU7NxmyesuxZ4oCdo@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2 See earlier about these being marked as regressions, but it should be fixed by commit dc61b1d6 ("sched: Fix PROVE_RCU vs cpu_cgroup"). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16322 > Subject : WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70() > Submitter : boris64 <bugzilla.kernel.org@boris64.net> > Date : 2010-07-01 13:54 (8 days old) > Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Magic. Strange and dark magic. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop > Submitter : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> > Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days old) > Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr@rogers.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 I think this might be usefully bisected. Shawn? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16309 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 oops trying to suspend. > Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-27 12:40 (12 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTinUH2p33-AWxOVDrLsNkn9rgEVrlwn5mfK7P8NH@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127764249926781&w=2 I'm pretty sure this was fixed by Nick in commit 57439f878afa ("fs: fix superblock iteration race"). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307 > Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (13 days old) > Message-ID : <4C26317A.5070309@postal.uv.es> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2 I don't think anybody noticed this one. Jesse? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16304 > Subject : i915 - high number of wakeups > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > Date : 2010-06-27 09:52 (12 days old) Duplicate of that 16307 one. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16284 > Subject : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code > Submitter : Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> > Date : 2010-06-23 12:57 (16 days old) > Message-ID : <20100623125740.GA3368@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127729789113432&w=2 This has "I have a fix, will post it very soon." in the thread from Frederic, but I'm not seeing anything else. Frederic? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265 > Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? > Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> > Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (30 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c > Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb@closure.thunk.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4 Dave, Jesse? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16234 > Subject : [2.6.35-rc3] reboot mutex 'bug'... > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-14 15:16 (25 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTimDcTnyEPmt2ZcCM1UWtn4AYKotiqyjobJApkO7@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127652861118933&w=2 Ok, this is definitely harmless. Whether we should silence the warning somehow is a separate question. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16230 > Subject : inconsistent IN-HARDIRQ-W -> HARDIRQ-ON-W usage: fasync, 2.6.35-rc3 > Submitter : Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> > Date : 2010-06-13 9:53 (26 days old) > Message-ID : <20100613095305.GA13231@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127642282208277&w=2 Fixed by commit f4985dc714d7. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228 > Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) > Submitter : Brian Bloniarz <phunge0@hotmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (23 days old) > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> This has a butt-ugly suggested patch that certainly won't be applied. I saw the thread, but lost sight of it. Jesse, did that end up with some resolution? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-11 20:31 (28 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTim0jVRyqkwlGOcrg_XTvUQwcBYfWJX-aRzkkrLG@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2 I dunno. Old, and apparently seen by two people. Dave? Might be helped by bisection. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16205 > Subject : acpi: freeing invalid memtype bf799000-bf79a000 > Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-09 20:09 (30 days old) > Message-ID : <20100609200910.GA2876@joi.lan> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611427029914&w=2 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127688398513862&w=2 This should be fixed by commit b945d6b2554d ("rbtree: Undo augmented trees performance damage and regression"). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16199 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-07 18:14 (32 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTin2pPqOUx--9fIX3BH3e-cU6oCRufijcx_4ozx5@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127593447812015&w=2 Another RCU proving thing. And this one looks the same as the 16323 one above, and fixed by the same commit as that one. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197 > Subject : [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' > Submitter : Ryan Wang <openspace.wang@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-07 0:23 (32 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTincwMZPnYW3S4uz4k2GOn52RpgBIBRfzyD010Yo@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127587022219378&w=2 These should all be gone. See commit 3be434f0244ee by Jesse ('Revert "PCI: create function symlinks in /sys/bus/pci/slots/N/"'). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16187 > Subject : Carrier detection failed in dhcpcd when link is up > Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> > Date : 2010-06-12 15:15 (27 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/10708f37ae729baba9b67bd134c3720709d4ae62 > Handled-By : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> David? This bisects to a networking commit. Doesn't look sensible, but what do I know? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184 > Subject : Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule > Submitter : Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp@safe.ca> > Date : 2010-06-12 04:17 (27 days old) > Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Patrick, Davem? Ping? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? > Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> > Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) > Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 Hmm. That one is the vt.c bug coupled with another problem, which in turn got opened as a separate bugzilla entry: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16252 which in turn then got closed. I dunno. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free > Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 Not a regression or a kernel bug at all. See the thread. Big ramdisk filled up all of memory when it was filled by the builds. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145 > Subject : Unable to boot unless "notsc" or "clocksource=hpet", or acpi_pad disabling the TSC > Submitter : Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> > Date : 2010-06-07 13:11 (32 days old) > Handled-By : Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com> > Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> This is not a regression. See the full bugzilla details. The same problem persists at least back to 2.6.30 with his config. So it's somehow specific to his particular config use that requires "notsc" to boot. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (35 days old) > Handled-By : Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> This looks like a duplicate of that 16312 bugzilla entry. Jens, has this been resolved? Linus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-07-09 1:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Jens Axboe, DRI, Linux SCSI List, Patrick McHardy, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Jesse Barnes, David S. Miller, Linux ACPI, Al Viro, Frederic Weisbecker, Dave Airlie, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Shawn Starr, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > Unresolved regressions > ---------------------- > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 > Subject : 2.6.35 regression > Submitter : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old) > Message-ID : <loom.20100705T144459-919@post.gmane.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2 This is a gcc-4.5 issue. Whether it's also something that we should change in the kernel is unclear, but at least as of now, the rule is that you cannot compile the kernel with gcc-4.5. No idea whether the compiler is just entirely broken, or whether it's just that it triggers something iffy by being overly clever. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16346 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-04 22:04 (5 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTinof0k28rk4rMr66aubxcRL2rFa5ZEArj1lqD3o@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127828107815930&w=2 I'm not entirely sure if these RCU proving things should count as regressions. Sure, the option to enable RCU proving is new, but the things it reports about generally are not new - and they are usually not even bugs in the sense that they necessarily cause any real problems. That particular one is in the single-thread optimizated case for fget_light, ie if (likely((atomic_read(&files->count) == 1))) { file = fcheck_files(files, fd); where I think it should be entirely safe in all ways without any locking. So I think it's a false positive too. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16334 > Subject : reiserfs locking (v2) > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-02 9:34 (7 days old) > Message-ID : <20100702093451.GA3973@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127806306303590&w=2 Frederic? Al? I assume this is some late fallout from the BKL removal ages ago.. It's the old filldir-vs-mmap crud, but normally it should be impossible to trigger because the inode for a directory should never be mmap'able, so we should never have the same i_mutex lock used for both mmap and for filldir protection. We saw some of that oddity long ago, I wonder if it's lockdep being confused about some inodes. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16333 > Subject : iwl3945: HARDWARE GONE?? > Submitter : Priit Laes <plaes@plaes.org> > Date : 2010-07-02 16:02 (7 days old) > Message-ID : <1278086575.2889.8.camel@chi> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127808659705983&w=2 This either got fixed, or will be practically impossible to debug. The reporter ends up being unable to reproduce the issue. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16332 > Subject : Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open) > Submitter : werner@guyane.yi.org > Date : 2010-07-02 3:34 (7 days old) > Message-ID : <1278041650.12788@guyane.yi.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127804167511930&w=2 This seems to be due to CONFIG_MRST (Moorestown). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16330 > Subject : Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3? > Submitter : Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> > Date : 2010-07-01 15:44 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <201007011744.19564.trenn@suse.de> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127799907218877&w=2 There's a suggested patch in http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127862524404291&w=2 but no reply to it yet. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16329 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3: Load average climbing to 3+ with no apparent reason: CPU 98% idle, with hardly no I/O > Submitter : Török Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-01 7:40 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <20100701104022.404410d6@debian> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127797005030536&w=2 This seems to be partly a confusion about what "load average" is. It's not a CPU load, it's a system load average, and disk-wait processes count towards it. He has some problem with his CD-ROM, and it sounds like it might be hardware on the verge of going bad. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16324 > Subject : Oops while running fs_racer test on a POWER6 box against latest git > Submitter : divya <dipraksh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Date : 2010-06-30 11:34 (9 days old) > Message-ID : <4C2B28F3.7000006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127789697303061&w=2 I wonder if this is the writeback problem. That POWER crash dump is unreadable, so it's hard to tell, but the load in question makes that at least likely. If so, it should hopefully be fixed in today's git (commit 83ba7b071f30f7c01f72518ad72d5cd203c27502 and friends). > Bug-entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16323 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-07-01 12:21 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTini6hz2LFeZi8CMUmY3xw1MU7NxmyesuxZ4oCdo@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2 See earlier about these being marked as regressions, but it should be fixed by commit dc61b1d6 ("sched: Fix PROVE_RCU vs cpu_cgroup"). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16322 > Subject : WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70() > Submitter : boris64 <bugzilla.kernel.org@boris64.net> > Date : 2010-07-01 13:54 (8 days old) > Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Magic. Strange and dark magic. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop > Submitter : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> > Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days old) > Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr@rogers.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 I think this might be usefully bisected. Shawn? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16309 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 oops trying to suspend. > Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-27 12:40 (12 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTinUH2p33-AWxOVDrLsNkn9rgEVrlwn5mfK7P8NH@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127764249926781&w=2 I'm pretty sure this was fixed by Nick in commit 57439f878afa ("fs: fix superblock iteration race"). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307 > Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (13 days old) > Message-ID : <4C26317A.5070309@postal.uv.es> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2 I don't think anybody noticed this one. Jesse? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16304 > Subject : i915 - high number of wakeups > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > Date : 2010-06-27 09:52 (12 days old) Duplicate of that 16307 one. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16284 > Subject : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code > Submitter : Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> > Date : 2010-06-23 12:57 (16 days old) > Message-ID : <20100623125740.GA3368@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127729789113432&w=2 This has "I have a fix, will post it very soon." in the thread from Frederic, but I'm not seeing anything else. Frederic? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265 > Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? > Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> > Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (30 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c > Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb@closure.thunk.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4 Dave, Jesse? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16234 > Subject : [2.6.35-rc3] reboot mutex 'bug'... > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-14 15:16 (25 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTimDcTnyEPmt2ZcCM1UWtn4AYKotiqyjobJApkO7@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127652861118933&w=2 Ok, this is definitely harmless. Whether we should silence the warning somehow is a separate question. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16230 > Subject : inconsistent IN-HARDIRQ-W -> HARDIRQ-ON-W usage: fasync, 2.6.35-rc3 > Submitter : Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> > Date : 2010-06-13 9:53 (26 days old) > Message-ID : <20100613095305.GA13231@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127642282208277&w=2 Fixed by commit f4985dc714d7. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228 > Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) > Submitter : Brian Bloniarz <phunge0@hotmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (23 days old) > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> This has a butt-ugly suggested patch that certainly won't be applied. I saw the thread, but lost sight of it. Jesse, did that end up with some resolution? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-11 20:31 (28 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTim0jVRyqkwlGOcrg_XTvUQwcBYfWJX-aRzkkrLG@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2 I dunno. Old, and apparently seen by two people. Dave? Might be helped by bisection. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16205 > Subject : acpi: freeing invalid memtype bf799000-bf79a000 > Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-09 20:09 (30 days old) > Message-ID : <20100609200910.GA2876@joi.lan> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611427029914&w=2 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127688398513862&w=2 This should be fixed by commit b945d6b2554d ("rbtree: Undo augmented trees performance damage and regression"). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16199 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-07 18:14 (32 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTin2pPqOUx--9fIX3BH3e-cU6oCRufijcx_4ozx5@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127593447812015&w=2 Another RCU proving thing. And this one looks the same as the 16323 one above, and fixed by the same commit as that one. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197 > Subject : [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' > Submitter : Ryan Wang <openspace.wang@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-07 0:23 (32 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTincwMZPnYW3S4uz4k2GOn52RpgBIBRfzyD010Yo@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127587022219378&w=2 These should all be gone. See commit 3be434f0244ee by Jesse ('Revert "PCI: create function symlinks in /sys/bus/pci/slots/N/"'). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16187 > Subject : Carrier detection failed in dhcpcd when link is up > Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> > Date : 2010-06-12 15:15 (27 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/10708f37ae729baba9b67bd134c3720709d4ae62 > Handled-By : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> David? This bisects to a networking commit. Doesn't look sensible, but what do I know? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184 > Subject : Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule > Submitter : Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp@safe.ca> > Date : 2010-06-12 04:17 (27 days old) > Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Patrick, Davem? Ping? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? > Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> > Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) > Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 Hmm. That one is the vt.c bug coupled with another problem, which in turn got opened as a separate bugzilla entry: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16252 which in turn then got closed. I dunno. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free > Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) > Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 Not a regression or a kernel bug at all. See the thread. Big ramdisk filled up all of memory when it was filled by the builds. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145 > Subject : Unable to boot unless "notsc" or "clocksource=hpet", or acpi_pad disabling the TSC > Submitter : Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> > Date : 2010-06-07 13:11 (32 days old) > Handled-By : Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com> > Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> This is not a regression. See the full bugzilla details. The same problem persists at least back to 2.6.30 with his config. So it's somehow specific to his particular config use that requires "notsc" to boot. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (35 days old) > Handled-By : Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> This looks like a duplicate of that 16312 bugzilla entry. Jens, has this been resolved? Linus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds (?) (?) @ 2010-07-09 2:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2010-07-09 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Jens Axboe, DRI, Linux SCSI List, Patrick McHardy, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Jesse Barnes, David S. Miller, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux ACPI, Al Viro, Dave Airlie, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Shawn Starr, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:34:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16284 > > Subject : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code > > Submitter : Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> > > Date : 2010-06-23 12:57 (16 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100623125740.GA3368@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127729789113432&w=2 > > This has "I have a fix, will post it very soon." in the thread from > Frederic, but I'm not seeing anything else. Frederic? Right. In fact it wasn't a regression. The per task breakpoint reservation design was broken from the beginning and this warning has revealed the problem. This only touched perf, and it did since perf support breakpoints. Fortunately ptrace wasn't concerned by this problem, even not by side effects of this. The fix is invasive as it's a rewrite of a (little) part of the breakpoint reservation. And since the symptom is only a warning and also breakpoints never released from the constraint table (just a counter, no memory leak), the fix is headed for 2.6.36. It is ready in tip:/perf/core: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=commitdiff;h=45a73372efe4a63f44aa2e1125d4a777c2fdc8d8 I think this ticket can be safely closed. Thanks. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first -- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-09 2:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2010-07-09 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI, Al Viro, Shawn Starr, Jesse Barnes, Dave Airlie, David S. Miller, Patrick McHardy, Jens Axboe On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:34:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16284 > > Subject : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code > > Submitter : Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> > > Date : 2010-06-23 12:57 (16 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100623125740.GA3368@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127729789113432&w=2 > > This has "I have a fix, will post it very soon." in the thread from > Frederic, but I'm not seeing anything else. Frederic? Right. In fact it wasn't a regression. The per task breakpoint reservation design was broken from the beginning and this warning has revealed the problem. This only touched perf, and it did since perf support breakpoints. Fortunately ptrace wasn't concerned by this problem, even not by side effects of this. The fix is invasive as it's a rewrite of a (little) part of the breakpoint reservation. And since the symptom is only a warning and also breakpoints never released from the constraint table (just a counter, no memory leak), the fix is headed for 2.6.36. It is ready in tip:/perf/core: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=commitdiff;h=45a73372efe4a63f44aa2e1125d4a777c2fdc8d8 I think this ticket can be safely closed. Thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-09 2:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2010-07-09 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI, Al Viro, Shawn Starr, Jesse Barnes, Dave Airlie, David S. Miller, Patrick McHardy, Jens Axboe On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:34:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16284 > > Subject : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code > > Submitter : Paul Mackerras <paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-06-23 12:57 (16 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100623125740.GA3368-oklZEfemRj05kJ7NmlRacFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127729789113432&w=2 > > This has "I have a fix, will post it very soon." in the thread from > Frederic, but I'm not seeing anything else. Frederic? Right. In fact it wasn't a regression. The per task breakpoint reservation design was broken from the beginning and this warning has revealed the problem. This only touched perf, and it did since perf support breakpoints. Fortunately ptrace wasn't concerned by this problem, even not by side effects of this. The fix is invasive as it's a rewrite of a (little) part of the breakpoint reservation. And since the symptom is only a warning and also breakpoints never released from the constraint table (just a counter, no memory leak), the fix is headed for 2.6.36. It is ready in tip:/perf/core: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=commitdiff;h=45a73372efe4a63f44aa2e1125d4a777c2fdc8d8 I think this ticket can be safely closed. Thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 2:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker (?) @ 2010-07-09 21:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Jens Axboe, Shawn Starr, DRI, Linux SCSI List, Patrick McHardy, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Jesse Barnes, David S. Miller, Linux ACPI, Al Viro, Dave Airlie, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki On Friday, July 09, 2010, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:34:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16284 > > > Subject : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code > > > Submitter : Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> > > > Date : 2010-06-23 12:57 (16 days old) > > > Message-ID : <20100623125740.GA3368@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127729789113432&w=2 > > > > This has "I have a fix, will post it very soon." in the thread from > > Frederic, but I'm not seeing anything else. Frederic? > > > > Right. In fact it wasn't a regression. The per task breakpoint reservation > design was broken from the beginning and this warning has revealed the > problem. This only touched perf, and it did since perf support breakpoints. > Fortunately ptrace wasn't concerned by this problem, even not by side effects > of this. > > The fix is invasive as it's a rewrite of a (little) part of the breakpoint > reservation. And since the symptom is only a warning and also breakpoints > never released from the constraint table (just a counter, no memory leak), > the fix is headed for 2.6.36. > > It is ready in tip:/perf/core: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=commitdiff;h=45a73372efe4a63f44aa2e1125d4a777c2fdc8d8 > > I think this ticket can be safely closed. OK, closing. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 2:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker (?) (?) @ 2010-07-09 21:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Linus Torvalds, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI, Al Viro, Shawn Starr, Jesse Barnes, Dave Airlie, David S. Miller, Patrick McHardy, Jens Axboe On Friday, July 09, 2010, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:34:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16284 > > > Subject : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code > > > Submitter : Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> > > > Date : 2010-06-23 12:57 (16 days old) > > > Message-ID : <20100623125740.GA3368@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127729789113432&w=2 > > > > This has "I have a fix, will post it very soon." in the thread from > > Frederic, but I'm not seeing anything else. Frederic? > > > > Right. In fact it wasn't a regression. The per task breakpoint reservation > design was broken from the beginning and this warning has revealed the > problem. This only touched perf, and it did since perf support breakpoints. > Fortunately ptrace wasn't concerned by this problem, even not by side effects > of this. > > The fix is invasive as it's a rewrite of a (little) part of the breakpoint > reservation. And since the symptom is only a warning and also breakpoints > never released from the constraint table (just a counter, no memory leak), > the fix is headed for 2.6.36. > > It is ready in tip:/perf/core: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=commitdiff;h=45a73372efe4a63f44aa2e1125d4a777c2fdc8d8 > > I think this ticket can be safely closed. OK, closing. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 2:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker ` (2 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 21:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Jens Axboe, Shawn Starr, DRI, Linux SCSI List, Patrick McHardy, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Jesse Barnes, David S. Miller, Linux ACPI, Al Viro, Dave Airlie, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki On Friday, July 09, 2010, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:34:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16284 > > > Subject : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code > > > Submitter : Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> > > > Date : 2010-06-23 12:57 (16 days old) > > > Message-ID : <20100623125740.GA3368@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127729789113432&w=2 > > > > This has "I have a fix, will post it very soon." in the thread from > > Frederic, but I'm not seeing anything else. Frederic? > > > > Right. In fact it wasn't a regression. The per task breakpoint reservation > design was broken from the beginning and this warning has revealed the > problem. This only touched perf, and it did since perf support breakpoints. > Fortunately ptrace wasn't concerned by this problem, even not by side effects > of this. > > The fix is invasive as it's a rewrite of a (little) part of the breakpoint > reservation. And since the symptom is only a warning and also breakpoints > never released from the constraint table (just a counter, no memory leak), > the fix is headed for 2.6.36. > > It is ready in tip:/perf/core: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=commitdiff;h=45a73372efe4a63f44aa2e1125d4a777c2fdc8d8 > > I think this ticket can be safely closed. OK, closing. Rafael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first -- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds ` (3 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 2:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2010-07-09 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Jens Axboe, DRI, Linux SCSI List, Patrick McHardy, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Jesse Barnes, David S. Miller, Linux ACPI, Al Viro, Dave Airlie, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Shawn Starr, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:34:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16284 > > Subject : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code > > Submitter : Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> > > Date : 2010-06-23 12:57 (16 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100623125740.GA3368@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127729789113432&w=2 > > This has "I have a fix, will post it very soon." in the thread from > Frederic, but I'm not seeing anything else. Frederic? Right. In fact it wasn't a regression. The per task breakpoint reservation design was broken from the beginning and this warning has revealed the problem. This only touched perf, and it did since perf support breakpoints. Fortunately ptrace wasn't concerned by this problem, even not by side effects of this. The fix is invasive as it's a rewrite of a (little) part of the breakpoint reservation. And since the symptom is only a warning and also breakpoints never released from the constraint table (just a counter, no memory leak), the fix is headed for 2.6.36. It is ready in tip:/perf/core: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=commitdiff;h=45a73372efe4a63f44aa2e1125d4a777c2fdc8d8 I think this ticket can be safely closed. Thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds ` (4 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 2:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2010-07-09 2:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Jens Axboe, DRI, Linux SCSI List, Patrick McHardy, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Jesse Barnes, David S. Miller, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux ACPI, Al Viro, Dave Airlie, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Shawn Starr, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:34:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16334 > > Subject : reiserfs locking (v2) > > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-02 9:34 (7 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100702093451.GA3973@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127806306303590&w=2 > > Frederic? Al? I assume this is some late fallout from the BKL removal > ages ago.. It's the old filldir-vs-mmap crud, but normally it should > be impossible to trigger because the inode for a directory should > never be mmap'able, so we should never have the same i_mutex lock used > for both mmap and for filldir protection. > > We saw some of that oddity long ago, I wonder if it's lockdep being > confused about some inodes. I think it has been there from the beginning. At least it was there before the reiserfs bkl removal in .32. Indeed the readdir <-> unmap/release inversion problem can not happen. But Al said that can happen between write and release. (Although I don't see where write takes the inode mutex). He also highlighted the fact that reiserfs refcounting based on i_count was totally broken. He has a fix the whole in the vfs tree, in the for-next branch on commit 6c2bdaf089a3876226893fab00dd83596c465ad2 "Fix reiserfs_file_release()" No more uses of the i_mutex on release after that, nor i_count, but a private openers refcount and a tailpack mutex per reiserfs inode. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first -- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds ` (5 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 2:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2010-07-09 2:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Jens Axboe, DRI, Linux SCSI List, Patrick McHardy, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Jesse Barnes, David S. Miller, Linux ACPI, Al Viro, Dave Airlie, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Shawn Starr, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:34:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16334 > > Subject : reiserfs locking (v2) > > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-02 9:34 (7 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100702093451.GA3973@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127806306303590&w=2 > > Frederic? Al? I assume this is some late fallout from the BKL removal > ages ago.. It's the old filldir-vs-mmap crud, but normally it should > be impossible to trigger because the inode for a directory should > never be mmap'able, so we should never have the same i_mutex lock used > for both mmap and for filldir protection. > > We saw some of that oddity long ago, I wonder if it's lockdep being > confused about some inodes. I think it has been there from the beginning. At least it was there before the reiserfs bkl removal in .32. Indeed the readdir <-> unmap/release inversion problem can not happen. But Al said that can happen between write and release. (Although I don't see where write takes the inode mutex). He also highlighted the fact that reiserfs refcounting based on i_count was totally broken. He has a fix the whole in the vfs tree, in the for-next branch on commit 6c2bdaf089a3876226893fab00dd83596c465ad2 "Fix reiserfs_file_release()" No more uses of the i_mutex on release after that, nor i_count, but a private openers refcount and a tailpack mutex per reiserfs inode. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds ` (6 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 2:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2010-07-09 2:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI, Al Viro, Shawn Starr, Jesse Barnes, Dave Airlie, David S. Miller, Patrick McHardy, Jens Axboe On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:34:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16334 > > Subject : reiserfs locking (v2) > > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-02 9:34 (7 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100702093451.GA3973@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127806306303590&w=2 > > Frederic? Al? I assume this is some late fallout from the BKL removal > ages ago.. It's the old filldir-vs-mmap crud, but normally it should > be impossible to trigger because the inode for a directory should > never be mmap'able, so we should never have the same i_mutex lock used > for both mmap and for filldir protection. > > We saw some of that oddity long ago, I wonder if it's lockdep being > confused about some inodes. I think it has been there from the beginning. At least it was there before the reiserfs bkl removal in .32. Indeed the readdir <-> unmap/release inversion problem can not happen. But Al said that can happen between write and release. (Although I don't see where write takes the inode mutex). He also highlighted the fact that reiserfs refcounting based on i_count was totally broken. He has a fix the whole in the vfs tree, in the for-next branch on commit 6c2bdaf089a3876226893fab00dd83596c465ad2 "Fix reiserfs_file_release()" No more uses of the i_mutex on release after that, nor i_count, but a private openers refcount and a tailpack mutex per reiserfs inode. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds ` (7 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 3:36 ` Shawn Starr -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Shawn Starr @ 2010-07-09 3:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Jens Axboe, DRI, Linux SCSI List, Patrick McHardy, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Jesse Barnes, David S. Miller, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux ACPI, Al Viro, Frederic Weisbecker, Dave Airlie, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki On Thursday, July 08, 2010 09:34:25 pm Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > Unresolved regressions > > ---------------------- > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 > > Subject : 2.6.35 regression > > Submitter : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old) > > Message-ID : <loom.20100705T144459-919@post.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2 > > This is a gcc-4.5 issue. Whether it's also something that we should > change in the kernel is unclear, but at least as of now, the rule is > that you cannot compile the kernel with gcc-4.5. No idea whether the > compiler is just entirely broken, or whether it's just that it > triggers something iffy by being overly clever. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16346 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked > > rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Submitter : Miles Lane > > <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-04 22:04 (5 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTinof0k28rk4rMr66aubxcRL2rFa5ZEArj1lqD3o@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127828107815930&w=2 > > I'm not entirely sure if these RCU proving things should count as > regressions. > > Sure, the option to enable RCU proving is new, but the things it > reports about generally are not new - and they are usually not even > bugs in the sense that they necessarily cause any real problems. > > That particular one is in the single-thread optimizated case for > fget_light, ie > > if (likely((atomic_read(&files->count) == 1))) { > file = fcheck_files(files, fd); > > where I think it should be entirely safe in all ways without any > locking. So I think it's a false positive too. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16334 > > Subject : reiserfs locking (v2) > > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-02 9:34 (7 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100702093451.GA3973@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127806306303590&w=2 > > Frederic? Al? I assume this is some late fallout from the BKL removal > ages ago.. It's the old filldir-vs-mmap crud, but normally it should > be impossible to trigger because the inode for a directory should > never be mmap'able, so we should never have the same i_mutex lock used > for both mmap and for filldir protection. > > We saw some of that oddity long ago, I wonder if it's lockdep being > confused about some inodes. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16333 > > Subject : iwl3945: HARDWARE GONE?? > > Submitter : Priit Laes <plaes@plaes.org> > > Date : 2010-07-02 16:02 (7 days old) > > Message-ID : <1278086575.2889.8.camel@chi> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127808659705983&w=2 > > This either got fixed, or will be practically impossible to debug. The > reporter ends up being unable to reproduce the issue. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16332 > > Subject : Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open) > > Submitter : werner@guyane.yi.org > > Date : 2010-07-02 3:34 (7 days old) > > Message-ID : <1278041650.12788@guyane.yi.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127804167511930&w=2 > > This seems to be due to CONFIG_MRST (Moorestown). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16330 > > Subject : Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3? > > Submitter : Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> > > Date : 2010-07-01 15:44 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : <201007011744.19564.trenn@suse.de> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127799907218877&w=2 > > There's a suggested patch in > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127862524404291&w=2 > > but no reply to it yet. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16329 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3: Load average climbing to 3+ with no > > apparent reason: CPU 98% idle, with hardly no I/O Submitter : > > Török Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-01 7:40 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100701104022.404410d6@debian> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127797005030536&w=2 > > This seems to be partly a confusion about what "load average" is. It's > not a CPU load, it's a system load average, and disk-wait processes > count towards it. He has some problem with his CD-ROM, and it sounds > like it might be hardware on the verge of going bad. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16324 > > Subject : Oops while running fs_racer test on a POWER6 box > > against latest git Submitter : divya <dipraksh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Date : 2010-06-30 11:34 (9 days old) > > Message-ID : <4C2B28F3.7000006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127789697303061&w=2 > > I wonder if this is the writeback problem. That POWER crash dump is > unreadable, so it's hard to tell, but the load in question makes that > at least likely. > > If so, it should hopefully be fixed in today's git (commit > 83ba7b071f30f7c01f72518ad72d5cd203c27502 and friends). > > > Bug-entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16323 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked > > rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Submitter : Miles Lane > > <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-01 12:21 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTini6hz2LFeZi8CMUmY3xw1MU7NxmyesuxZ4oCdo@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2 > > See earlier about these being marked as regressions, but it should be > fixed by commit dc61b1d6 ("sched: Fix PROVE_RCU vs cpu_cgroup"). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16322 > > Subject : WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 > > read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70() Submitter : boris64 > > <bugzilla.kernel.org@boris64.net> > > Date : 2010-07-01 13:54 (8 days old) > > Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> > > Magic. Strange and dark magic. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 > > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo > > W500 laptop Submitter : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> > > Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days old) > > Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr@rogers.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 > > I think this might be usefully bisected. Shawn? > I'll have to try bisecting this weekend. It continues in Linux sh0n.net 2.6.35-rc4+ #1 SMP Wed Jul 7 23:58:41 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16309 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 oops trying to suspend. > > Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-27 12:40 (12 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTinUH2p33-AWxOVDrLsNkn9rgEVrlwn5mfK7P8NH@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127764249926781&w=2 > > I'm pretty sure this was fixed by Nick in commit 57439f878afa ("fs: > fix superblock iteration race"). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307 > > Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups > > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > > Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (13 days old) > > Message-ID : <4C26317A.5070309@postal.uv.es> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2 > > I don't think anybody noticed this one. Jesse? > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16304 > > Subject : i915 - high number of wakeups > > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > > Date : 2010-06-27 09:52 (12 days old) > > Duplicate of that 16307 one. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16284 > > Subject : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code > > Submitter : Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> > > Date : 2010-06-23 12:57 (16 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100623125740.GA3368@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127729789113432&w=2 > > This has "I have a fix, will post it very soon." in the thread from > Frederic, but I'm not seeing anything else. Frederic? > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265 > > Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? > > Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> > > Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (30 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: > > http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c > > Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb@closure.thunk.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4 > > Dave, Jesse? > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16234 > > Subject : [2.6.35-rc3] reboot mutex 'bug'... > > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-14 15:16 (25 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTimDcTnyEPmt2ZcCM1UWtn4AYKotiqyjobJApkO7@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127652861118933&w=2 > > Ok, this is definitely harmless. Whether we should silence the warning > somehow is a separate question. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16230 > > Subject : inconsistent IN-HARDIRQ-W -> HARDIRQ-ON-W usage: > > fasync, 2.6.35-rc3 Submitter : Dominik Brodowski > > <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Date : 2010-06-13 9:53 (26 days > > old) > > Message-ID : <20100613095305.GA13231@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127642282208277&w=2 > > Fixed by commit f4985dc714d7. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228 > > Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 > > (pci/ahci_stop_engine) Submitter : Brian Bloniarz > > <phunge0@hotmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (23 days old) > > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> > > This has a butt-ugly suggested patch that certainly won't be applied. > I saw the thread, but lost sight of it. Jesse, did that end up with > some resolution? > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid > > framebuffer id Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-11 20:31 (28 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTim0jVRyqkwlGOcrg_XTvUQwcBYfWJX-aRzkkrLG@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2 > > I dunno. Old, and apparently seen by two people. Dave? > > Might be helped by bisection. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16205 > > Subject : acpi: freeing invalid memtype bf799000-bf79a000 > > Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-09 20:09 (30 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100609200910.GA2876@joi.lan> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611427029914&w=2 > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127688398513862&w=2 > > This should be fixed by commit b945d6b2554d ("rbtree: Undo augmented > trees performance damage and regression"). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16199 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked > > rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Submitter : Miles Lane > > <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-07 18:14 (32 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTin2pPqOUx--9fIX3BH3e-cU6oCRufijcx_4ozx5@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127593447812015&w=2 > > Another RCU proving thing. And this one looks the same as the 16323 > one above, and fixed by the same commit as that one. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197 > > Subject : [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate > > filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' Submitter > > : Ryan Wang <openspace.wang@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-07 0:23 (32 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTincwMZPnYW3S4uz4k2GOn52RpgBIBRfzyD010Yo@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127587022219378&w=2 > > These should all be gone. See commit 3be434f0244ee by Jesse ('Revert > "PCI: create function symlinks in /sys/bus/pci/slots/N/"'). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16187 > > Subject : Carrier detection failed in dhcpcd when link is up > > Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> > > Date : 2010-06-12 15:15 (27 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: > > http://git.kernel.org/linus/10708f37ae729baba9b67bd134c3720709d4ae62 > > Handled-By : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > David? This bisects to a networking commit. Doesn't look sensible, but > what do I know? > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184 > > Subject : Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule > > Submitter : Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp@safe.ca> > > Date : 2010-06-12 04:17 (27 days old) > > Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> > > Patrick, Davem? Ping? > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? > > Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> > > Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 > > Hmm. That one is the vt.c bug coupled with another problem, which in > turn got opened as a separate bugzilla entry: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16252 > > which in turn then got closed. I dunno. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory > > not free Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 > > Not a regression or a kernel bug at all. See the thread. Big ramdisk > filled up all of memory when it was filled by the builds. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145 > > Subject : Unable to boot unless "notsc" or "clocksource=hpet", or > > acpi_pad disabling the TSC Submitter : Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> > > Date : 2010-06-07 13:11 (32 days old) > > Handled-By : Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com> > > Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> > > This is not a regression. See the full bugzilla details. The same > problem persists at least back to 2.6.30 with his config. So it's > somehow specific to his particular config use that requires "notsc" to > boot. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 > > __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 Submitter : Larry Finger > > <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (35 days old) > > Handled-By : Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> > > This looks like a duplicate of that 16312 bugzilla entry. Jens, has > this been resolved? > > Linus ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first -- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds ` (8 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 3:36 ` Shawn Starr 2010-07-20 0:33 ` Shawn Starr -1 siblings, 1 reply; 187+ messages in thread From: Shawn Starr @ 2010-07-09 3:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI, Frederic Weisbecker, Al Viro, Jesse Barnes, Dave Airlie, David S. Miller, Patrick McHardy, Jens Axboe On Thursday, July 08, 2010 09:34:25 pm Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > Unresolved regressions > > ---------------------- > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 > > Subject : 2.6.35 regression > > Submitter : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old) > > Message-ID : <loom.20100705T144459-919@post.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2 > > This is a gcc-4.5 issue. Whether it's also something that we should > change in the kernel is unclear, but at least as of now, the rule is > that you cannot compile the kernel with gcc-4.5. No idea whether the > compiler is just entirely broken, or whether it's just that it > triggers something iffy by being overly clever. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16346 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked > > rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Submitter : Miles Lane > > <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-04 22:04 (5 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTinof0k28rk4rMr66aubxcRL2rFa5ZEArj1lqD3o@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127828107815930&w=2 > > I'm not entirely sure if these RCU proving things should count as > regressions. > > Sure, the option to enable RCU proving is new, but the things it > reports about generally are not new - and they are usually not even > bugs in the sense that they necessarily cause any real problems. > > That particular one is in the single-thread optimizated case for > fget_light, ie > > if (likely((atomic_read(&files->count) == 1))) { > file = fcheck_files(files, fd); > > where I think it should be entirely safe in all ways without any > locking. So I think it's a false positive too. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16334 > > Subject : reiserfs locking (v2) > > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-02 9:34 (7 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100702093451.GA3973@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127806306303590&w=2 > > Frederic? Al? I assume this is some late fallout from the BKL removal > ages ago.. It's the old filldir-vs-mmap crud, but normally it should > be impossible to trigger because the inode for a directory should > never be mmap'able, so we should never have the same i_mutex lock used > for both mmap and for filldir protection. > > We saw some of that oddity long ago, I wonder if it's lockdep being > confused about some inodes. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16333 > > Subject : iwl3945: HARDWARE GONE?? > > Submitter : Priit Laes <plaes@plaes.org> > > Date : 2010-07-02 16:02 (7 days old) > > Message-ID : <1278086575.2889.8.camel@chi> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127808659705983&w=2 > > This either got fixed, or will be practically impossible to debug. The > reporter ends up being unable to reproduce the issue. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16332 > > Subject : Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open) > > Submitter : werner@guyane.yi.org > > Date : 2010-07-02 3:34 (7 days old) > > Message-ID : <1278041650.12788@guyane.yi.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127804167511930&w=2 > > This seems to be due to CONFIG_MRST (Moorestown). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16330 > > Subject : Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3? > > Submitter : Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> > > Date : 2010-07-01 15:44 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : <201007011744.19564.trenn@suse.de> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127799907218877&w=2 > > There's a suggested patch in > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127862524404291&w=2 > > but no reply to it yet. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16329 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3: Load average climbing to 3+ with no > > apparent reason: CPU 98% idle, with hardly no I/O Submitter : > > Török Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-01 7:40 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100701104022.404410d6@debian> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127797005030536&w=2 > > This seems to be partly a confusion about what "load average" is. It's > not a CPU load, it's a system load average, and disk-wait processes > count towards it. He has some problem with his CD-ROM, and it sounds > like it might be hardware on the verge of going bad. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16324 > > Subject : Oops while running fs_racer test on a POWER6 box > > against latest git Submitter : divya <dipraksh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Date : 2010-06-30 11:34 (9 days old) > > Message-ID : <4C2B28F3.7000006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127789697303061&w=2 > > I wonder if this is the writeback problem. That POWER crash dump is > unreadable, so it's hard to tell, but the load in question makes that > at least likely. > > If so, it should hopefully be fixed in today's git (commit > 83ba7b071f30f7c01f72518ad72d5cd203c27502 and friends). > > > Bug-entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16323 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked > > rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Submitter : Miles Lane > > <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-01 12:21 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTini6hz2LFeZi8CMUmY3xw1MU7NxmyesuxZ4oCdo@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2 > > See earlier about these being marked as regressions, but it should be > fixed by commit dc61b1d6 ("sched: Fix PROVE_RCU vs cpu_cgroup"). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16322 > > Subject : WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 > > read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70() Submitter : boris64 > > <bugzilla.kernel.org@boris64.net> > > Date : 2010-07-01 13:54 (8 days old) > > Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> > > Magic. Strange and dark magic. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 > > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo > > W500 laptop Submitter : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> > > Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days old) > > Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr@rogers.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 > > I think this might be usefully bisected. Shawn? > I'll have to try bisecting this weekend. It continues in Linux sh0n.net 2.6.35-rc4+ #1 SMP Wed Jul 7 23:58:41 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16309 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 oops trying to suspend. > > Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-27 12:40 (12 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTinUH2p33-AWxOVDrLsNkn9rgEVrlwn5mfK7P8NH@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127764249926781&w=2 > > I'm pretty sure this was fixed by Nick in commit 57439f878afa ("fs: > fix superblock iteration race"). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307 > > Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups > > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > > Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (13 days old) > > Message-ID : <4C26317A.5070309@postal.uv.es> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2 > > I don't think anybody noticed this one. Jesse? > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16304 > > Subject : i915 - high number of wakeups > > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > > Date : 2010-06-27 09:52 (12 days old) > > Duplicate of that 16307 one. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16284 > > Subject : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code > > Submitter : Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> > > Date : 2010-06-23 12:57 (16 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100623125740.GA3368@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127729789113432&w=2 > > This has "I have a fix, will post it very soon." in the thread from > Frederic, but I'm not seeing anything else. Frederic? > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265 > > Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? > > Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> > > Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (30 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: > > http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c > > Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb@closure.thunk.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4 > > Dave, Jesse? > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16234 > > Subject : [2.6.35-rc3] reboot mutex 'bug'... > > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-14 15:16 (25 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTimDcTnyEPmt2ZcCM1UWtn4AYKotiqyjobJApkO7@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127652861118933&w=2 > > Ok, this is definitely harmless. Whether we should silence the warning > somehow is a separate question. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16230 > > Subject : inconsistent IN-HARDIRQ-W -> HARDIRQ-ON-W usage: > > fasync, 2.6.35-rc3 Submitter : Dominik Brodowski > > <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Date : 2010-06-13 9:53 (26 days > > old) > > Message-ID : <20100613095305.GA13231@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127642282208277&w=2 > > Fixed by commit f4985dc714d7. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228 > > Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 > > (pci/ahci_stop_engine) Submitter : Brian Bloniarz > > <phunge0@hotmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (23 days old) > > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> > > This has a butt-ugly suggested patch that certainly won't be applied. > I saw the thread, but lost sight of it. Jesse, did that end up with > some resolution? > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid > > framebuffer id Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-11 20:31 (28 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTim0jVRyqkwlGOcrg_XTvUQwcBYfWJX-aRzkkrLG@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2 > > I dunno. Old, and apparently seen by two people. Dave? > > Might be helped by bisection. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16205 > > Subject : acpi: freeing invalid memtype bf799000-bf79a000 > > Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-09 20:09 (30 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100609200910.GA2876@joi.lan> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611427029914&w=2 > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127688398513862&w=2 > > This should be fixed by commit b945d6b2554d ("rbtree: Undo augmented > trees performance damage and regression"). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16199 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked > > rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Submitter : Miles Lane > > <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-07 18:14 (32 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTin2pPqOUx--9fIX3BH3e-cU6oCRufijcx_4ozx5@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127593447812015&w=2 > > Another RCU proving thing. And this one looks the same as the 16323 > one above, and fixed by the same commit as that one. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197 > > Subject : [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate > > filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' Submitter > > : Ryan Wang <openspace.wang@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-07 0:23 (32 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTincwMZPnYW3S4uz4k2GOn52RpgBIBRfzyD010Yo@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127587022219378&w=2 > > These should all be gone. See commit 3be434f0244ee by Jesse ('Revert > "PCI: create function symlinks in /sys/bus/pci/slots/N/"'). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16187 > > Subject : Carrier detection failed in dhcpcd when link is up > > Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> > > Date : 2010-06-12 15:15 (27 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: > > http://git.kernel.org/linus/10708f37ae729baba9b67bd134c3720709d4ae62 > > Handled-By : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > David? This bisects to a networking commit. Doesn't look sensible, but > what do I know? > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184 > > Subject : Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule > > Submitter : Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp@safe.ca> > > Date : 2010-06-12 04:17 (27 days old) > > Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> > > Patrick, Davem? Ping? > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? > > Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> > > Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 > > Hmm. That one is the vt.c bug coupled with another problem, which in > turn got opened as a separate bugzilla entry: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16252 > > which in turn then got closed. I dunno. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory > > not free Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 > > Not a regression or a kernel bug at all. See the thread. Big ramdisk > filled up all of memory when it was filled by the builds. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145 > > Subject : Unable to boot unless "notsc" or "clocksource=hpet", or > > acpi_pad disabling the TSC Submitter : Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> > > Date : 2010-06-07 13:11 (32 days old) > > Handled-By : Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com> > > Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> > > This is not a regression. See the full bugzilla details. The same > problem persists at least back to 2.6.30 with his config. So it's > somehow specific to his particular config use that requires "notsc" to > boot. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 > > __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 Submitter : Larry Finger > > <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (35 days old) > > Handled-By : Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> > > This looks like a duplicate of that 16312 bugzilla entry. Jens, has > this been resolved? > > Linus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-20 0:33 ` Shawn Starr 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Shawn Starr @ 2010-07-20 0:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Rafael J. Wysocki On Thursday, July 08, 2010 11:36:25 pm Shawn Starr wrote: <snip> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 > > > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo > > > W500 laptop Submitter : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> > > > Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days old) > > > Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr@rogers.com> > > > References : > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 > > > > I think this might be usefully bisected. Shawn? > > I'll have to try bisecting this weekend. It continues in Linux sh0n.net > 2.6.35-rc4+ #1 SMP Wed Jul 7 23:58:41 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 > GNU/Linux > This continues even with no USB devices plugged in. Will try with today's snapshot build from Linus's tree. If this still happens, I'll see about bisecting. Thanks, Shawn. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-20 0:33 ` Shawn Starr 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Shawn Starr @ 2010-07-20 0:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Rafael J. Wysocki On Thursday, July 08, 2010 11:36:25 pm Shawn Starr wrote: <snip> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 > > > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo > > > W500 laptop Submitter : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > > > Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days old) > > > Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > > > References : > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 > > > > I think this might be usefully bisected. Shawn? > > I'll have to try bisecting this weekend. It continues in Linux sh0n.net > 2.6.35-rc4+ #1 SMP Wed Jul 7 23:58:41 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 > GNU/Linux > This continues even with no USB devices plugged in. Will try with today's snapshot build from Linus's tree. If this still happens, I'll see about bisecting. Thanks, Shawn. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-20 1:12 ` Shawn Starr 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Shawn Starr @ 2010-07-20 1:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Rafael J. Wysocki On Monday, July 19, 2010 08:33:30 pm Shawn Starr wrote: > On Thursday, July 08, 2010 11:36:25 pm Shawn Starr wrote: > > <snip> > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 > > > > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend > > > > Lenovo W500 laptop Submitter : Shawn Starr > > > > <shawn.starr@rogers.com> Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days > > > > old) > > > > Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr@rogers.com> > > > > References : > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 > > > > > > I think this might be usefully bisected. Shawn? > > > > I'll have to try bisecting this weekend. It continues in Linux sh0n.net > > 2.6.35-rc4+ #1 SMP Wed Jul 7 23:58:41 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 > > GNU/Linux > > This continues even with no USB devices plugged in. Will try with today's > snapshot build from Linus's tree. If this still happens, I'll see about > bisecting. > > Thanks, > Shawn. I also am testing this patch I noticed in anholt's tree, this may be GPU suspend issue. diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c index 60a5800..6e20252 100644 (file) --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c @@ -602,7 +602,9 @@ void i915_save_display(struct drm_device *dev) /* Only save FBC state on the platform that supports FBC */ if (I915_HAS_FBC(dev)) { - if (IS_GM45(dev)) { + if (IS_IRONLAKE_M(dev)) { + dev_priv->saveDPFC_CB_BASE = I915_READ(ILK_DPFC_CB_BASE); + } else if (IS_GM45(dev)) { dev_priv->saveDPFC_CB_BASE = I915_READ(DPFC_CB_BASE); } else { dev_priv->saveFBC_CFB_BASE = I915_READ(FBC_CFB_BASE); @@ -706,7 +708,10 @@ void i915_restore_display(struct drm_device *dev) /* only restore FBC info on the platform that supports FBC*/ if (I915_HAS_FBC(dev)) { - if (IS_GM45(dev)) { + if (IS_IRONLAKE_M(dev)) { + ironlake_disable_fbc(dev); + I915_WRITE(ILK_DPFC_CB_BASE, dev_priv- >saveDPFC_CB_BASE); + } else if (IS_GM45(dev)) { g4x_disable_fbc(dev); I915_WRITE(DPFC_CB_BASE, dev_priv->saveDPFC_CB_BASE); } else { ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-20 1:12 ` Shawn Starr 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Shawn Starr @ 2010-07-20 1:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Rafael J. Wysocki On Monday, July 19, 2010 08:33:30 pm Shawn Starr wrote: > On Thursday, July 08, 2010 11:36:25 pm Shawn Starr wrote: > > <snip> > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 > > > > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend > > > > Lenovo W500 laptop Submitter : Shawn Starr > > > > <shawn.starr-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days > > > > old) > > > > Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > > > > References : > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 > > > > > > I think this might be usefully bisected. Shawn? > > > > I'll have to try bisecting this weekend. It continues in Linux sh0n.net > > 2.6.35-rc4+ #1 SMP Wed Jul 7 23:58:41 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 > > GNU/Linux > > This continues even with no USB devices plugged in. Will try with today's > snapshot build from Linus's tree. If this still happens, I'll see about > bisecting. > > Thanks, > Shawn. I also am testing this patch I noticed in anholt's tree, this may be GPU suspend issue. diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c index 60a5800..6e20252 100644 (file) --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c @@ -602,7 +602,9 @@ void i915_save_display(struct drm_device *dev) /* Only save FBC state on the platform that supports FBC */ if (I915_HAS_FBC(dev)) { - if (IS_GM45(dev)) { + if (IS_IRONLAKE_M(dev)) { + dev_priv->saveDPFC_CB_BASE = I915_READ(ILK_DPFC_CB_BASE); + } else if (IS_GM45(dev)) { dev_priv->saveDPFC_CB_BASE = I915_READ(DPFC_CB_BASE); } else { dev_priv->saveFBC_CFB_BASE = I915_READ(FBC_CFB_BASE); @@ -706,7 +708,10 @@ void i915_restore_display(struct drm_device *dev) /* only restore FBC info on the platform that supports FBC*/ if (I915_HAS_FBC(dev)) { - if (IS_GM45(dev)) { + if (IS_IRONLAKE_M(dev)) { + ironlake_disable_fbc(dev); + I915_WRITE(ILK_DPFC_CB_BASE, dev_priv- >saveDPFC_CB_BASE); + } else if (IS_GM45(dev)) { g4x_disable_fbc(dev); I915_WRITE(DPFC_CB_BASE, dev_priv->saveDPFC_CB_BASE); } else { ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-20 2:13 ` Shawn Starr 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Shawn Starr @ 2010-07-20 2:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Rafael J. Wysocki On Monday, July 19, 2010 09:12:08 pm Shawn Starr wrote: > On Monday, July 19, 2010 08:33:30 pm Shawn Starr wrote: > > On Thursday, July 08, 2010 11:36:25 pm Shawn Starr wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 > > > > > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend > > > > > Lenovo W500 laptop Submitter : Shawn Starr > > > > > <shawn.starr@rogers.com> Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days > > > > > old) > > > > > Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr@rogers.com> > > > > > References : > > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 > > > > > > > > I think this might be usefully bisected. Shawn? > > > > > > I'll have to try bisecting this weekend. It continues in Linux sh0n.net > > > 2.6.35-rc4+ #1 SMP Wed Jul 7 23:58:41 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 > > > GNU/Linux > > > > This continues even with no USB devices plugged in. Will try with today's > > snapshot build from Linus's tree. If this still happens, I'll see about > > bisecting. > > > > Thanks, > > Shawn. > > I also am testing this patch I noticed in anholt's tree, this may be GPU > suspend issue. > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c > index 60a5800..6e20252 100644 (file) > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c > @@ -602,7 +602,9 @@ void i915_save_display(struct drm_device *dev) > > /* Only save FBC state on the platform that supports FBC */ > if (I915_HAS_FBC(dev)) { > - if (IS_GM45(dev)) { > + if (IS_IRONLAKE_M(dev)) { > + dev_priv->saveDPFC_CB_BASE = > I915_READ(ILK_DPFC_CB_BASE); > + } else if (IS_GM45(dev)) { > dev_priv->saveDPFC_CB_BASE = > I915_READ(DPFC_CB_BASE); } else { > dev_priv->saveFBC_CFB_BASE = > I915_READ(FBC_CFB_BASE); @@ -706,7 +708,10 @@ void > i915_restore_display(struct drm_device *dev) > > /* only restore FBC info on the platform that supports FBC*/ > if (I915_HAS_FBC(dev)) { > - if (IS_GM45(dev)) { > + if (IS_IRONLAKE_M(dev)) { > + ironlake_disable_fbc(dev); > + I915_WRITE(ILK_DPFC_CB_BASE, dev_priv- > > >saveDPFC_CB_BASE); > > + } else if (IS_GM45(dev)) { > g4x_disable_fbc(dev); > I915_WRITE(DPFC_CB_BASE, > dev_priv->saveDPFC_CB_BASE); } else { Made no difference, today's git snapshot, 2.6.35-rc5-git4 w/ airlied + anholt drm git trees still hangs attempting to suspend. in Fedora, it drops to the Fedora logo w/ KMS mode then fails to finish suspending (moon light flashes off and on), I do hear the disk heads parking though. I will look at bisecting this week when time permits. If anyone else might know what might be the issue it would save some time in the bisecting. Thanks, Shawn. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-20 2:13 ` Shawn Starr 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Shawn Starr @ 2010-07-20 2:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Rafael J. Wysocki On Monday, July 19, 2010 09:12:08 pm Shawn Starr wrote: > On Monday, July 19, 2010 08:33:30 pm Shawn Starr wrote: > > On Thursday, July 08, 2010 11:36:25 pm Shawn Starr wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 > > > > > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend > > > > > Lenovo W500 laptop Submitter : Shawn Starr > > > > > <shawn.starr-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days > > > > > old) > > > > > Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > > > > > References : > > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 > > > > > > > > I think this might be usefully bisected. Shawn? > > > > > > I'll have to try bisecting this weekend. It continues in Linux sh0n.net > > > 2.6.35-rc4+ #1 SMP Wed Jul 7 23:58:41 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 > > > GNU/Linux > > > > This continues even with no USB devices plugged in. Will try with today's > > snapshot build from Linus's tree. If this still happens, I'll see about > > bisecting. > > > > Thanks, > > Shawn. > > I also am testing this patch I noticed in anholt's tree, this may be GPU > suspend issue. > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c > index 60a5800..6e20252 100644 (file) > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c > @@ -602,7 +602,9 @@ void i915_save_display(struct drm_device *dev) > > /* Only save FBC state on the platform that supports FBC */ > if (I915_HAS_FBC(dev)) { > - if (IS_GM45(dev)) { > + if (IS_IRONLAKE_M(dev)) { > + dev_priv->saveDPFC_CB_BASE = > I915_READ(ILK_DPFC_CB_BASE); > + } else if (IS_GM45(dev)) { > dev_priv->saveDPFC_CB_BASE = > I915_READ(DPFC_CB_BASE); } else { > dev_priv->saveFBC_CFB_BASE = > I915_READ(FBC_CFB_BASE); @@ -706,7 +708,10 @@ void > i915_restore_display(struct drm_device *dev) > > /* only restore FBC info on the platform that supports FBC*/ > if (I915_HAS_FBC(dev)) { > - if (IS_GM45(dev)) { > + if (IS_IRONLAKE_M(dev)) { > + ironlake_disable_fbc(dev); > + I915_WRITE(ILK_DPFC_CB_BASE, dev_priv- > > >saveDPFC_CB_BASE); > > + } else if (IS_GM45(dev)) { > g4x_disable_fbc(dev); > I915_WRITE(DPFC_CB_BASE, > dev_priv->saveDPFC_CB_BASE); } else { Made no difference, today's git snapshot, 2.6.35-rc5-git4 w/ airlied + anholt drm git trees still hangs attempting to suspend. in Fedora, it drops to the Fedora logo w/ KMS mode then fails to finish suspending (moon light flashes off and on), I do hear the disk heads parking though. I will look at bisecting this week when time permits. If anyone else might know what might be the issue it would save some time in the bisecting. Thanks, Shawn. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-20 15:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-20 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shawn Starr; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Tuesday, July 20, 2010, Shawn Starr wrote: > On Monday, July 19, 2010 09:12:08 pm Shawn Starr wrote: > > On Monday, July 19, 2010 08:33:30 pm Shawn Starr wrote: > > > On Thursday, July 08, 2010 11:36:25 pm Shawn Starr wrote: > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 > > > > > > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend > > > > > > Lenovo W500 laptop Submitter : Shawn Starr > > > > > > <shawn.starr@rogers.com> Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days > > > > > > old) > > > > > > Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr@rogers.com> > > > > > > References : > > > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 > > > > > > > > > > I think this might be usefully bisected. Shawn? > > > > > > > > I'll have to try bisecting this weekend. It continues in Linux sh0n.net > > > > 2.6.35-rc4+ #1 SMP Wed Jul 7 23:58:41 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 > > > > GNU/Linux > > > > > > This continues even with no USB devices plugged in. Will try with today's > > > snapshot build from Linus's tree. If this still happens, I'll see about > > > bisecting. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Shawn. > > > > I also am testing this patch I noticed in anholt's tree, this may be GPU > > suspend issue. > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c > > index 60a5800..6e20252 100644 (file) > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c > > @@ -602,7 +602,9 @@ void i915_save_display(struct drm_device *dev) > > > > /* Only save FBC state on the platform that supports FBC */ > > if (I915_HAS_FBC(dev)) { > > - if (IS_GM45(dev)) { > > + if (IS_IRONLAKE_M(dev)) { > > + dev_priv->saveDPFC_CB_BASE = > > I915_READ(ILK_DPFC_CB_BASE); > > + } else if (IS_GM45(dev)) { > > dev_priv->saveDPFC_CB_BASE = > > I915_READ(DPFC_CB_BASE); } else { > > dev_priv->saveFBC_CFB_BASE = > > I915_READ(FBC_CFB_BASE); @@ -706,7 +708,10 @@ void > > i915_restore_display(struct drm_device *dev) > > > > /* only restore FBC info on the platform that supports FBC*/ > > if (I915_HAS_FBC(dev)) { > > - if (IS_GM45(dev)) { > > + if (IS_IRONLAKE_M(dev)) { > > + ironlake_disable_fbc(dev); > > + I915_WRITE(ILK_DPFC_CB_BASE, dev_priv- > > > > >saveDPFC_CB_BASE); > > > > + } else if (IS_GM45(dev)) { > > g4x_disable_fbc(dev); > > I915_WRITE(DPFC_CB_BASE, > > dev_priv->saveDPFC_CB_BASE); } else { > > > Made no difference, today's git snapshot, 2.6.35-rc5-git4 w/ airlied + anholt > drm git trees still hangs attempting to suspend. in Fedora, it drops to the > Fedora logo w/ KMS mode then fails to finish suspending (moon light flashes > off and on), I do hear the disk heads parking though. Thanks for the update. > I will look at bisecting this week when time permits. If anyone else might > know what might be the issue it would save some time in the bisecting. Well, nothing comes to mind immediately at the moment. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-20 15:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-20 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shawn Starr; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Tuesday, July 20, 2010, Shawn Starr wrote: > On Monday, July 19, 2010 09:12:08 pm Shawn Starr wrote: > > On Monday, July 19, 2010 08:33:30 pm Shawn Starr wrote: > > > On Thursday, July 08, 2010 11:36:25 pm Shawn Starr wrote: > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 > > > > > > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend > > > > > > Lenovo W500 laptop Submitter : Shawn Starr > > > > > > <shawn.starr-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days > > > > > > old) > > > > > > Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > > > > > > References : > > > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 > > > > > > > > > > I think this might be usefully bisected. Shawn? > > > > > > > > I'll have to try bisecting this weekend. It continues in Linux sh0n.net > > > > 2.6.35-rc4+ #1 SMP Wed Jul 7 23:58:41 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 > > > > GNU/Linux > > > > > > This continues even with no USB devices plugged in. Will try with today's > > > snapshot build from Linus's tree. If this still happens, I'll see about > > > bisecting. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Shawn. > > > > I also am testing this patch I noticed in anholt's tree, this may be GPU > > suspend issue. > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c > > index 60a5800..6e20252 100644 (file) > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c > > @@ -602,7 +602,9 @@ void i915_save_display(struct drm_device *dev) > > > > /* Only save FBC state on the platform that supports FBC */ > > if (I915_HAS_FBC(dev)) { > > - if (IS_GM45(dev)) { > > + if (IS_IRONLAKE_M(dev)) { > > + dev_priv->saveDPFC_CB_BASE = > > I915_READ(ILK_DPFC_CB_BASE); > > + } else if (IS_GM45(dev)) { > > dev_priv->saveDPFC_CB_BASE = > > I915_READ(DPFC_CB_BASE); } else { > > dev_priv->saveFBC_CFB_BASE = > > I915_READ(FBC_CFB_BASE); @@ -706,7 +708,10 @@ void > > i915_restore_display(struct drm_device *dev) > > > > /* only restore FBC info on the platform that supports FBC*/ > > if (I915_HAS_FBC(dev)) { > > - if (IS_GM45(dev)) { > > + if (IS_IRONLAKE_M(dev)) { > > + ironlake_disable_fbc(dev); > > + I915_WRITE(ILK_DPFC_CB_BASE, dev_priv- > > > > >saveDPFC_CB_BASE); > > > > + } else if (IS_GM45(dev)) { > > g4x_disable_fbc(dev); > > I915_WRITE(DPFC_CB_BASE, > > dev_priv->saveDPFC_CB_BASE); } else { > > > Made no difference, today's git snapshot, 2.6.35-rc5-git4 w/ airlied + anholt > drm git trees still hangs attempting to suspend. in Fedora, it drops to the > Fedora logo w/ KMS mode then fails to finish suspending (moon light flashes > off and on), I do hear the disk heads parking though. Thanks for the update. > I will look at bisecting this week when time permits. If anyone else might > know what might be the issue it would save some time in the bisecting. Well, nothing comes to mind immediately at the moment. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds ` (9 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 3:36 ` Shawn Starr -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Shawn Starr @ 2010-07-09 3:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Jens Axboe, DRI, Linux SCSI List, Patrick McHardy, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Jesse Barnes, David S. Miller, Linux ACPI, Al Viro, Frederic Weisbecker, Dave Airlie, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki On Thursday, July 08, 2010 09:34:25 pm Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > Unresolved regressions > > ---------------------- > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 > > Subject : 2.6.35 regression > > Submitter : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old) > > Message-ID : <loom.20100705T144459-919@post.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2 > > This is a gcc-4.5 issue. Whether it's also something that we should > change in the kernel is unclear, but at least as of now, the rule is > that you cannot compile the kernel with gcc-4.5. No idea whether the > compiler is just entirely broken, or whether it's just that it > triggers something iffy by being overly clever. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16346 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked > > rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Submitter : Miles Lane > > <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-04 22:04 (5 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTinof0k28rk4rMr66aubxcRL2rFa5ZEArj1lqD3o@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127828107815930&w=2 > > I'm not entirely sure if these RCU proving things should count as > regressions. > > Sure, the option to enable RCU proving is new, but the things it > reports about generally are not new - and they are usually not even > bugs in the sense that they necessarily cause any real problems. > > That particular one is in the single-thread optimizated case for > fget_light, ie > > if (likely((atomic_read(&files->count) == 1))) { > file = fcheck_files(files, fd); > > where I think it should be entirely safe in all ways without any > locking. So I think it's a false positive too. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16334 > > Subject : reiserfs locking (v2) > > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-02 9:34 (7 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100702093451.GA3973@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127806306303590&w=2 > > Frederic? Al? I assume this is some late fallout from the BKL removal > ages ago.. It's the old filldir-vs-mmap crud, but normally it should > be impossible to trigger because the inode for a directory should > never be mmap'able, so we should never have the same i_mutex lock used > for both mmap and for filldir protection. > > We saw some of that oddity long ago, I wonder if it's lockdep being > confused about some inodes. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16333 > > Subject : iwl3945: HARDWARE GONE?? > > Submitter : Priit Laes <plaes@plaes.org> > > Date : 2010-07-02 16:02 (7 days old) > > Message-ID : <1278086575.2889.8.camel@chi> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127808659705983&w=2 > > This either got fixed, or will be practically impossible to debug. The > reporter ends up being unable to reproduce the issue. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16332 > > Subject : Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open) > > Submitter : werner@guyane.yi.org > > Date : 2010-07-02 3:34 (7 days old) > > Message-ID : <1278041650.12788@guyane.yi.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127804167511930&w=2 > > This seems to be due to CONFIG_MRST (Moorestown). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16330 > > Subject : Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3? > > Submitter : Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> > > Date : 2010-07-01 15:44 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : <201007011744.19564.trenn@suse.de> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127799907218877&w=2 > > There's a suggested patch in > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127862524404291&w=2 > > but no reply to it yet. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16329 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3: Load average climbing to 3+ with no > > apparent reason: CPU 98% idle, with hardly no I/O Submitter : > > Török Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-01 7:40 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100701104022.404410d6@debian> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127797005030536&w=2 > > This seems to be partly a confusion about what "load average" is. It's > not a CPU load, it's a system load average, and disk-wait processes > count towards it. He has some problem with his CD-ROM, and it sounds > like it might be hardware on the verge of going bad. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16324 > > Subject : Oops while running fs_racer test on a POWER6 box > > against latest git Submitter : divya <dipraksh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Date : 2010-06-30 11:34 (9 days old) > > Message-ID : <4C2B28F3.7000006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127789697303061&w=2 > > I wonder if this is the writeback problem. That POWER crash dump is > unreadable, so it's hard to tell, but the load in question makes that > at least likely. > > If so, it should hopefully be fixed in today's git (commit > 83ba7b071f30f7c01f72518ad72d5cd203c27502 and friends). > > > Bug-entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16323 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked > > rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Submitter : Miles Lane > > <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-01 12:21 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTini6hz2LFeZi8CMUmY3xw1MU7NxmyesuxZ4oCdo@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2 > > See earlier about these being marked as regressions, but it should be > fixed by commit dc61b1d6 ("sched: Fix PROVE_RCU vs cpu_cgroup"). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16322 > > Subject : WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 > > read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70() Submitter : boris64 > > <bugzilla.kernel.org@boris64.net> > > Date : 2010-07-01 13:54 (8 days old) > > Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> > > Magic. Strange and dark magic. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16311 > > Subject : [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo > > W500 laptop Submitter : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> > > Date : 2010-06-28 0:45 (11 days old) > > Message-ID : <201006272045.17004.shawn.starr@rogers.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127768633705286&w=2 > > I think this might be usefully bisected. Shawn? > I'll have to try bisecting this weekend. It continues in Linux sh0n.net 2.6.35-rc4+ #1 SMP Wed Jul 7 23:58:41 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16309 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 oops trying to suspend. > > Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-27 12:40 (12 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTinUH2p33-AWxOVDrLsNkn9rgEVrlwn5mfK7P8NH@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127764249926781&w=2 > > I'm pretty sure this was fixed by Nick in commit 57439f878afa ("fs: > fix superblock iteration race"). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307 > > Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups > > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > > Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (13 days old) > > Message-ID : <4C26317A.5070309@postal.uv.es> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2 > > I don't think anybody noticed this one. Jesse? > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16304 > > Subject : i915 - high number of wakeups > > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > > Date : 2010-06-27 09:52 (12 days old) > > Duplicate of that 16307 one. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16284 > > Subject : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code > > Submitter : Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> > > Date : 2010-06-23 12:57 (16 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100623125740.GA3368@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127729789113432&w=2 > > This has "I have a fix, will post it very soon." in the thread from > Frederic, but I'm not seeing anything else. Frederic? > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265 > > Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? > > Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> > > Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (30 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: > > http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c > > Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb@closure.thunk.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4 > > Dave, Jesse? > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16234 > > Subject : [2.6.35-rc3] reboot mutex 'bug'... > > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-14 15:16 (25 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTimDcTnyEPmt2ZcCM1UWtn4AYKotiqyjobJApkO7@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127652861118933&w=2 > > Ok, this is definitely harmless. Whether we should silence the warning > somehow is a separate question. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16230 > > Subject : inconsistent IN-HARDIRQ-W -> HARDIRQ-ON-W usage: > > fasync, 2.6.35-rc3 Submitter : Dominik Brodowski > > <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Date : 2010-06-13 9:53 (26 days > > old) > > Message-ID : <20100613095305.GA13231@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127642282208277&w=2 > > Fixed by commit f4985dc714d7. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228 > > Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 > > (pci/ahci_stop_engine) Submitter : Brian Bloniarz > > <phunge0@hotmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (23 days old) > > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> > > This has a butt-ugly suggested patch that certainly won't be applied. > I saw the thread, but lost sight of it. Jesse, did that end up with > some resolution? > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid > > framebuffer id Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-11 20:31 (28 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTim0jVRyqkwlGOcrg_XTvUQwcBYfWJX-aRzkkrLG@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2 > > I dunno. Old, and apparently seen by two people. Dave? > > Might be helped by bisection. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16205 > > Subject : acpi: freeing invalid memtype bf799000-bf79a000 > > Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-09 20:09 (30 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100609200910.GA2876@joi.lan> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611427029914&w=2 > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127688398513862&w=2 > > This should be fixed by commit b945d6b2554d ("rbtree: Undo augmented > trees performance damage and regression"). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16199 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked > > rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Submitter : Miles Lane > > <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-07 18:14 (32 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTin2pPqOUx--9fIX3BH3e-cU6oCRufijcx_4ozx5@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127593447812015&w=2 > > Another RCU proving thing. And this one looks the same as the 16323 > one above, and fixed by the same commit as that one. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197 > > Subject : [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate > > filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' Submitter > > : Ryan Wang <openspace.wang@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-07 0:23 (32 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTincwMZPnYW3S4uz4k2GOn52RpgBIBRfzyD010Yo@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127587022219378&w=2 > > These should all be gone. See commit 3be434f0244ee by Jesse ('Revert > "PCI: create function symlinks in /sys/bus/pci/slots/N/"'). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16187 > > Subject : Carrier detection failed in dhcpcd when link is up > > Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> > > Date : 2010-06-12 15:15 (27 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: > > http://git.kernel.org/linus/10708f37ae729baba9b67bd134c3720709d4ae62 > > Handled-By : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > David? This bisects to a networking commit. Doesn't look sensible, but > what do I know? > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184 > > Subject : Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule > > Submitter : Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp@safe.ca> > > Date : 2010-06-12 04:17 (27 days old) > > Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> > > Patrick, Davem? Ping? > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? > > Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> > > Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 > > Hmm. That one is the vt.c bug coupled with another problem, which in > turn got opened as a separate bugzilla entry: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16252 > > which in turn then got closed. I dunno. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory > > not free Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) > > Message-ID : > > <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 > > Not a regression or a kernel bug at all. See the thread. Big ramdisk > filled up all of memory when it was filled by the builds. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145 > > Subject : Unable to boot unless "notsc" or "clocksource=hpet", or > > acpi_pad disabling the TSC Submitter : Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> > > Date : 2010-06-07 13:11 (32 days old) > > Handled-By : Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com> > > Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> > > This is not a regression. See the full bugzilla details. The same > problem persists at least back to 2.6.30 with his config. So it's > somehow specific to his particular config use that requires "notsc" to > boot. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 > > __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 Submitter : Larry Finger > > <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (35 days old) > > Handled-By : Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> > > This looks like a duplicate of that 16312 bugzilla entry. Jens, has > this been resolved? > > Linus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds ` (10 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 4:34 ` David Miller 2010-07-09 5:28 ` Eric Dumazet -1 siblings, 1 reply; 187+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2010-07-09 4:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: torvalds; +Cc: rjw, linux-kernel, akpm, netdev, kaber, jengelh From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 18:34:25 -0700 > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: >> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16187 >> Subject : Carrier detection failed in dhcpcd when link is up >> Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> >> Date : 2010-06-12 15:15 (27 days old) >> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/10708f37ae729baba9b67bd134c3720709d4ae62 >> Handled-By : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > David? This bisects to a networking commit. Doesn't look sensible, but > what do I know? My suspicion is that dhcpd uses netlink to dump the info of the available links, and due to some bug gets confused with the new 64-bit statistic netlink attribute being there now. That shouldn't happen, applications should just ignore the attributes which they don't understand. I'll try to find a second to have a look at this. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 4:34 ` David Miller @ 2010-07-09 5:28 ` Eric Dumazet 2010-07-09 6:20 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 1 reply; 187+ messages in thread From: Eric Dumazet @ 2010-07-09 5:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller Cc: torvalds, rjw, linux-kernel, akpm, netdev, kaber, jengelh, casteyde.christian Le jeudi 08 juillet 2010 à 21:34 -0700, David Miller a écrit : > From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> > Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 18:34:25 -0700 > > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > >> > >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16187 > >> Subject : Carrier detection failed in dhcpcd when link is up > >> Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> > >> Date : 2010-06-12 15:15 (27 days old) > >> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/10708f37ae729baba9b67bd134c3720709d4ae62 > >> Handled-By : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > > > David? This bisects to a networking commit. Doesn't look sensible, but > > what do I know? > > My suspicion is that dhcpd uses netlink to dump the info of the > available links, and due to some bug gets confused with the new 64-bit > statistic netlink attribute being there now. > a second to have a look at this. It could be a dhcpcd bug because of extended size of answer According to strace, dhcpcd tries a recvmsg() call with a 256 bytes buffer to hold answer. Looking at current dhcpcd source, I confirm it cannot realloc its buffer static int get_netlink(int fd, int flags, int (*callback)(struct nlmsghdr *)) { char *buffer = NULL; ssize_t bytes; struct nlmsghdr *nlm; int r = -1; buffer = xzalloc(sizeof(char) * BUFFERLEN); for (;;) { bytes = recv(fd, buffer, BUFFERLEN, flags); if (bytes == -1) { if (errno == EAGAIN) { r = 0; goto eexit; } if (errno == EINTR) continue; goto eexit; } This program needs to fix this. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 5:28 ` Eric Dumazet @ 2010-07-09 6:20 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2010-07-09 6:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: eric.dumazet Cc: torvalds, rjw, linux-kernel, akpm, netdev, kaber, jengelh, casteyde.christian From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 07:28:54 +0200 > Le jeudi 08 juillet 2010 à 21:34 -0700, David Miller a écrit : >> From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> >> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 18:34:25 -0700 >> >> > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: >> >> >> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16187 >> >> Subject : Carrier detection failed in dhcpcd when link is up >> >> Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> >> >> Date : 2010-06-12 15:15 (27 days old) >> >> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/10708f37ae729baba9b67bd134c3720709d4ae62 >> >> Handled-By : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> >> > >> > David? This bisects to a networking commit. Doesn't look sensible, but >> > what do I know? >> >> My suspicion is that dhcpd uses netlink to dump the info of the >> available links, and due to some bug gets confused with the new 64-bit >> statistic netlink attribute being there now. >> a second to have a look at this. > > It could be a dhcpcd bug because of extended size of answer > > According to strace, dhcpcd tries a recvmsg() call with > a 256 bytes buffer to hold answer. > > Looking at current dhcpcd source, I confirm it cannot realloc its buffer ... > This program needs to fix this. Agreed, I don't there is any reasonable way we could cater to this application bug with some compatability bits. Restricting the link dump to 256 bytes is just too much inflexibility. If NetworkManager can get this right, dhcpd very well can too :-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds ` (11 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 7:11 ` Ingo Molnar -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Ingo Molnar @ 2010-07-09 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds, Paul E. McKenney, Peter Zijlstra, Thomas Gleixner Cc: Jens Axboe, DRI, Linux SCSI List, Patrick McHardy, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Jesse Barnes, David S. Miller, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux ACPI, Al Viro, Frederic Weisbecker, Dave Airlie, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Shawn Starr, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > Bug-Entry ? ? ? : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16346 > > Subject ? ? ? ? : 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > > Submitter ? ? ? : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date ? ? ? ? ? ?: 2010-07-04 22:04 (5 days old) > > Message-ID ? ? ?: <AANLkTinof0k28rk4rMr66aubxcRL2rFa5ZEArj1lqD3o@mail.gmail.com> > > References ? ? ?: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127828107815930&w=2 > > I'm not entirely sure if these RCU proving things should count as > regressions. Generally not - and we've delayed at least one more complex (cgroups) fix to v2.6.36 because the patch itself was riskier than the warning. Still most of the warning fixes turned out to be simple, so we merged the very-low-risk ones and right now we seem to be on top of them. But in general the default rule is that we delay these fixes to v2.6.36. > Sure, the option to enable RCU proving is new, but the things it reports > about generally are not new - and they are usually not even bugs in the > sense that they necessarily cause any real problems. > > That particular one is in the single-thread optimizated case for fget_light, ie > > if (likely((atomic_read(&files->count) == 1))) { > file = fcheck_files(files, fd); > > where I think it should be entirely safe in all ways without any locking. So > I think it's a false positive too. Yeah, it's a bit like with lockdep (and it's a bit like with compiler warning fixes): we had to punch through a large stack of false positives that accumulated in the past 10 years. ( Because real bugs eventually get fixed, while false positives always just accumulate. So almost by definition we always start with a very assymetric collection of warnings and a large stack of false positives. ) Having said that, it appears we got most of the false positives and are beginning to be in a more representative equilibrium now. If v2.6.35 isnt going to be warning-free then v2.6.36 certainly will be and new warnings will have a much higher likelyhood of being real (and new) bugs (not just accumulated false-positives). Ingo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first -- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds ` (12 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 7:11 ` Ingo Molnar -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Ingo Molnar @ 2010-07-09 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds, Paul E. McKenney, Peter Zijlstra, Thomas Gleixner Cc: Jens Axboe, DRI, Linux SCSI List, Patrick McHardy, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Jesse Barnes, David S. Miller, Linux ACPI, Al Viro, Frederic Weisbecker, Dave Airlie, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Shawn Starr, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > Bug-Entry ? ? ? : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16346 > > Subject ? ? ? ? : 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > > Submitter ? ? ? : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date ? ? ? ? ? ?: 2010-07-04 22:04 (5 days old) > > Message-ID ? ? ?: <AANLkTinof0k28rk4rMr66aubxcRL2rFa5ZEArj1lqD3o@mail.gmail.com> > > References ? ? ?: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127828107815930&w=2 > > I'm not entirely sure if these RCU proving things should count as > regressions. Generally not - and we've delayed at least one more complex (cgroups) fix to v2.6.36 because the patch itself was riskier than the warning. Still most of the warning fixes turned out to be simple, so we merged the very-low-risk ones and right now we seem to be on top of them. But in general the default rule is that we delay these fixes to v2.6.36. > Sure, the option to enable RCU proving is new, but the things it reports > about generally are not new - and they are usually not even bugs in the > sense that they necessarily cause any real problems. > > That particular one is in the single-thread optimizated case for fget_light, ie > > if (likely((atomic_read(&files->count) == 1))) { > file = fcheck_files(files, fd); > > where I think it should be entirely safe in all ways without any locking. So > I think it's a false positive too. Yeah, it's a bit like with lockdep (and it's a bit like with compiler warning fixes): we had to punch through a large stack of false positives that accumulated in the past 10 years. ( Because real bugs eventually get fixed, while false positives always just accumulate. So almost by definition we always start with a very assymetric collection of warnings and a large stack of false positives. ) Having said that, it appears we got most of the false positives and are beginning to be in a more representative equilibrium now. If v2.6.35 isnt going to be warning-free then v2.6.36 certainly will be and new warnings will have a much higher likelyhood of being real (and new) bugs (not just accumulated false-positives). Ingo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-09 7:11 ` Ingo Molnar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Ingo Molnar @ 2010-07-09 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds, Paul E. McKenney, Peter Zijlstra, Thomas Gleixner Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI, Frederic Weisbecker, Al Viro, Shawn Starr, Jesse Barnes, Dave Airlie, David S. Miller, Patrick McHardy, Jens Axboe * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > Bug-Entry ? ? ? : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16346 > > Subject ? ? ? ? : 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > > Submitter ? ? ? : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date ? ? ? ? ? ?: 2010-07-04 22:04 (5 days old) > > Message-ID ? ? ?: <AANLkTinof0k28rk4rMr66aubxcRL2rFa5ZEArj1lqD3o@mail.gmail.com> > > References ? ? ?: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127828107815930&w=2 > > I'm not entirely sure if these RCU proving things should count as > regressions. Generally not - and we've delayed at least one more complex (cgroups) fix to v2.6.36 because the patch itself was riskier than the warning. Still most of the warning fixes turned out to be simple, so we merged the very-low-risk ones and right now we seem to be on top of them. But in general the default rule is that we delay these fixes to v2.6.36. > Sure, the option to enable RCU proving is new, but the things it reports > about generally are not new - and they are usually not even bugs in the > sense that they necessarily cause any real problems. > > That particular one is in the single-thread optimizated case for fget_light, ie > > if (likely((atomic_read(&files->count) == 1))) { > file = fcheck_files(files, fd); > > where I think it should be entirely safe in all ways without any locking. So > I think it's a false positive too. Yeah, it's a bit like with lockdep (and it's a bit like with compiler warning fixes): we had to punch through a large stack of false positives that accumulated in the past 10 years. ( Because real bugs eventually get fixed, while false positives always just accumulate. So almost by definition we always start with a very assymetric collection of warnings and a large stack of false positives. ) Having said that, it appears we got most of the false positives and are beginning to be in a more representative equilibrium now. If v2.6.35 isnt going to be warning-free then v2.6.36 certainly will be and new warnings will have a much higher likelyhood of being real (and new) bugs (not just accumulated false-positives). Ingo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-09 7:11 ` Ingo Molnar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Ingo Molnar @ 2010-07-09 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds, Paul E. McKenney, Peter Zijlstra, Thomas Gleixner Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI, Frederic Weisbecker, Al Viro, Shawn Starr, Jesse Barnes, Dave Airlie, David S. Miller, Patrick McHardy, Jens Axboe * Linus Torvalds <torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > Bug-Entry ? ? ? : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16346 > > Subject ? ? ? ? : 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > > Submitter ? ? ? : Miles Lane <miles.lane-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date ? ? ? ? ? ?: 2010-07-04 22:04 (5 days old) > > Message-ID ? ? ?: <AANLkTinof0k28rk4rMr66aubxcRL2rFa5ZEArj1lqD3o-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> > > References ? ? ?: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127828107815930&w=2 > > I'm not entirely sure if these RCU proving things should count as > regressions. Generally not - and we've delayed at least one more complex (cgroups) fix to v2.6.36 because the patch itself was riskier than the warning. Still most of the warning fixes turned out to be simple, so we merged the very-low-risk ones and right now we seem to be on top of them. But in general the default rule is that we delay these fixes to v2.6.36. > Sure, the option to enable RCU proving is new, but the things it reports > about generally are not new - and they are usually not even bugs in the > sense that they necessarily cause any real problems. > > That particular one is in the single-thread optimizated case for fget_light, ie > > if (likely((atomic_read(&files->count) == 1))) { > file = fcheck_files(files, fd); > > where I think it should be entirely safe in all ways without any locking. So > I think it's a false positive too. Yeah, it's a bit like with lockdep (and it's a bit like with compiler warning fixes): we had to punch through a large stack of false positives that accumulated in the past 10 years. ( Because real bugs eventually get fixed, while false positives always just accumulate. So almost by definition we always start with a very assymetric collection of warnings and a large stack of false positives. ) Having said that, it appears we got most of the false positives and are beginning to be in a more representative equilibrium now. If v2.6.35 isnt going to be warning-free then v2.6.36 certainly will be and new warnings will have a much higher likelyhood of being real (and new) bugs (not just accumulated false-positives). Ingo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-09 15:12 ` Jesse Barnes 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Jesse Barnes @ 2010-07-09 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI, Frederic Weisbecker, Al Viro, Shawn Starr, Dave Airlie, David S. Miller, Patrick McHardy, Jens Axboe, Enrico Bandiello, Norbert Preining On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 18:34:25 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307 > > Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups > > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > > Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (13 days old) > > Message-ID : <4C26317A.5070309@postal.uv.es> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2 > > I don't think anybody noticed this one. Jesse? Oh I hadn't seen that... Enrico, can you bisect this issue? It could be some spurious hotplug events or possibly a stuck vblank interrupt... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265 > > Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? > > Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> > > Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (30 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c > > Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb@closure.thunk.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4 > > Dave, Jesse? I haven't looked at the switchable graphics stuff, hopefully Dave has an idea here. > Fixed by commit f4985dc714d7. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228 > > Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) > > Submitter : Brian Bloniarz <phunge0@hotmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (23 days old) > > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> > > This has a butt-ugly suggested patch that certainly won't be applied. > I saw the thread, but lost sight of it. Jesse, did that end up with > some resolution? I'll follow up with Yinghai, we were pretty clear about what we wanted from that patch. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? > > Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> > > Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 > > Hmm. That one is the vt.c bug coupled with another problem, which in > turn got opened as a separate bugzilla entry: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16252 > > which in turn then got closed. I dunno. Yeah, this is weird. Norbert, do you still see this? Have you tried to bisect it? -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-09 15:12 ` Jesse Barnes 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Jesse Barnes @ 2010-07-09 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI, Frederic Weisbecker, Al Viro, Shawn Starr, Dave Airlie, David S. Miller, Patrick McHardy, Jens Axboe, Enrico Bandiello, Norbert Preining On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 18:34:25 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307 > > Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups > > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban-c0jvKHQHzSy7MTZChrCvtQ@public.gmane.orges> > > Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (13 days old) > > Message-ID : <4C26317A.5070309-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2 > > I don't think anybody noticed this one. Jesse? Oh I hadn't seen that... Enrico, can you bisect this issue? It could be some spurious hotplug events or possibly a stuck vblank interrupt... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265 > > Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? > > Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (30 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c > > Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb-UK71uKi2zitAjzmPenPY9A@public.gmane.orgrg> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4 > > Dave, Jesse? I haven't looked at the switchable graphics stuff, hopefully Dave has an idea here. > Fixed by commit f4985dc714d7. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228 > > Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) > > Submitter : Brian Bloniarz <phunge0-PkbjNfxxIASIwRZHo2/mJg@public.gmane.orgm> > > Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (23 days old) > > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas-zDltkPw22Qs@public.gmane.orgm> > > This has a butt-ugly suggested patch that certainly won't be applied. > I saw the thread, but lost sight of it. Jesse, did that end up with > some resolution? I'll follow up with Yinghai, we were pretty clear about what we wanted from that patch. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? > > Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> > > Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399-DqSSrKF0TaxD4ZLkIoI8Yg@public.gmane.org.tuwien.ac.at> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 > > Hmm. That one is the vt.c bug coupled with another problem, which in > turn got opened as a separate bugzilla entry: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16252 > > which in turn then got closed. I dunno. Yeah, this is weird. Norbert, do you still see this? Have you tried to bisect it? -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 15:12 ` Jesse Barnes (?) @ 2010-07-09 15:41 ` Enrico Bandiello 2010-07-09 17:01 ` Enrico Bandiello -1 siblings, 1 reply; 187+ messages in thread From: Enrico Bandiello @ 2010-07-09 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jesse Barnes, linux-kernel On 07/09/2010 05:12 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 18:34:25 -0700 > Linus Torvalds<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > >>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307 >>> Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups >>> Submitter : Enrico Bandiello<enban@postal.uv.es> >>> Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (13 days old) >>> Message-ID :<4C26317A.5070309@postal.uv.es> >>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2 >> >> I don't think anybody noticed this one. Jesse? > > Oh I hadn't seen that... Enrico, can you bisect this issue? It could > be some spurious hotplug events or possibly a stuck vblank interrupt... Well... Let me try; being the firts time I send a bug report I've just to learn how to do this kind of stuff. In this moment I'm compiling -rc4 to see if the "problem" persists. After, I'll try to go on with bisecting. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 15:41 ` Enrico Bandiello @ 2010-07-09 17:01 ` Enrico Bandiello 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Enrico Bandiello @ 2010-07-09 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jesse Barnes, linux-kernel On 07/09/2010 05:41 PM, Enrico Bandiello wrote: > Well... Let me try; being the firts time I send a bug report I've just > to learn how to do this kind of stuff. In this moment I'm compiling -rc4 > to see if the "problem" persists. After, I'll try to go on with bisecting. Same "problem" with -rc4... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 15:12 ` Jesse Barnes (?) (?) @ 2010-07-09 16:04 ` Norbert Preining 2010-07-09 21:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 21:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 2 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Norbert Preining @ 2010-07-09 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List Hi Jesse, (stripping some people from Cc, hopefully not too many) On Fr, 09 Jul 2010, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 > > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? > > > Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> > > > Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) > > > Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 > > > > Hmm. That one is the vt.c bug coupled with another problem, which in > > turn got opened as a separate bugzilla entry: > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16252 > > > > which in turn then got closed. I dunno. > > Yeah, this is weird. Norbert, do you still see this? Have you tried > to bisect it? I wrote in my last comment of this bug that in *most* of the cases the echo "mem" > /sys/power/state works perfectly, and I'm using it permanently now. The problem seems to be in combination with some pm-utils scripts. I still haven't been able to pin-point the actual pm-utils script that causes the problem, since that is something not 100% reproducible. Futhermore, *once* (only once!) the echo mem > method failed as written in the bug report with : [16273.....] PM: resume of devices complete after 2115.046 msecs [16273.....] Restarting tasks ... done [16273.....] video LNXVIDEO:00: Restoring backlight state hanging here, but only once, not any time again. It is hard to say what the culprit is, some new pm-utils script maybe, since it happens even when I switch pm-utils to use the kernel method (echo mem) to suspend, and not uswsusp (s2ram prog). I would suggest keeping that bug closed until I have found the pm-utils or a specific culprit, then I can reopen it or open a new bug. (more disturbing are iwlagn bugs, they are a PITA without any progress) Best wishes Norbert ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Norbert Preining preining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org} JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ BLEAN Scientific measure of luminosity : 1 glimmer = 100,000 bleans. Usherettes' torches are designed to produce between 2.5 and 4 bleans, enabling them to assist you in falling downstairs, treading on people or putting your hand into a Neapolitan tub when reaching for change. --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 16:04 ` Norbert Preining @ 2010-07-09 21:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 21:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 1 sibling, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Norbert Preining Cc: Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Kernel Testers List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Jesse Barnes On Friday, July 09, 2010, Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi Jesse, > > (stripping some people from Cc, hopefully not too many) > > On Fr, 09 Jul 2010, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 > > > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? > > > > Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> > > > > Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) > > > > Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 > > > > > > Hmm. That one is the vt.c bug coupled with another problem, which in > > > turn got opened as a separate bugzilla entry: > > > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16252 > > > > > > which in turn then got closed. I dunno. > > > > Yeah, this is weird. Norbert, do you still see this? Have you tried > > to bisect it? > > I wrote in my last comment of this bug that in *most* of the cases > the > echo "mem" > /sys/power/state > works perfectly, and I'm using it permanently now. > > The problem seems to be in combination with some pm-utils scripts. > I still haven't been able to pin-point the actual pm-utils script that > causes the problem, since that is something not 100% reproducible. > > Futhermore, *once* (only once!) the echo mem > method failed as written in > the bug report with : > [16273.....] PM: resume of devices complete after 2115.046 msecs > [16273.....] Restarting tasks ... done > [16273.....] video LNXVIDEO:00: Restoring backlight state > hanging here, but only once, not any time again. > > It is hard to say what the culprit is, some new pm-utils script maybe, > since it happens even when I switch pm-utils to use the kernel method > (echo mem) to suspend, and not uswsusp (s2ram prog). > > I would suggest keeping that bug closed until I have found the pm-utils > or a specific culprit, then I can reopen it or open a new bug. > > (more disturbing are iwlagn bugs, they are a PITA without any progress) OK, closing. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 16:04 ` Norbert Preining 2010-07-09 21:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 21:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 1 sibling, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Norbert Preining Cc: Jesse Barnes, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List On Friday, July 09, 2010, Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi Jesse, > > (stripping some people from Cc, hopefully not too many) > > On Fr, 09 Jul 2010, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 > > > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? > > > > Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> > > > > Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) > > > > Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 > > > > > > Hmm. That one is the vt.c bug coupled with another problem, which in > > > turn got opened as a separate bugzilla entry: > > > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16252 > > > > > > which in turn then got closed. I dunno. > > > > Yeah, this is weird. Norbert, do you still see this? Have you tried > > to bisect it? > > I wrote in my last comment of this bug that in *most* of the cases > the > echo "mem" > /sys/power/state > works perfectly, and I'm using it permanently now. > > The problem seems to be in combination with some pm-utils scripts. > I still haven't been able to pin-point the actual pm-utils script that > causes the problem, since that is something not 100% reproducible. > > Futhermore, *once* (only once!) the echo mem > method failed as written in > the bug report with : > [16273.....] PM: resume of devices complete after 2115.046 msecs > [16273.....] Restarting tasks ... done > [16273.....] video LNXVIDEO:00: Restoring backlight state > hanging here, but only once, not any time again. > > It is hard to say what the culprit is, some new pm-utils script maybe, > since it happens even when I switch pm-utils to use the kernel method > (echo mem) to suspend, and not uswsusp (s2ram prog). > > I would suggest keeping that bug closed until I have found the pm-utils > or a specific culprit, then I can reopen it or open a new bug. > > (more disturbing are iwlagn bugs, they are a PITA without any progress) OK, closing. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 15:12 ` Jesse Barnes ` (2 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 16:04 ` Norbert Preining -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Norbert Preining @ 2010-07-09 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Kernel Testers List, Linux Kernel Mailing List Hi Jesse, (stripping some people from Cc, hopefully not too many) On Fr, 09 Jul 2010, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 > > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? > > > Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> > > > Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) > > > Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 > > > > Hmm. That one is the vt.c bug coupled with another problem, which in > > turn got opened as a separate bugzilla entry: > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16252 > > > > which in turn then got closed. I dunno. > > Yeah, this is weird. Norbert, do you still see this? Have you tried > to bisect it? I wrote in my last comment of this bug that in *most* of the cases the echo "mem" > /sys/power/state works perfectly, and I'm using it permanently now. The problem seems to be in combination with some pm-utils scripts. I still haven't been able to pin-point the actual pm-utils script that causes the problem, since that is something not 100% reproducible. Futhermore, *once* (only once!) the echo mem > method failed as written in the bug report with : [16273.....] PM: resume of devices complete after 2115.046 msecs [16273.....] Restarting tasks ... done [16273.....] video LNXVIDEO:00: Restoring backlight state hanging here, but only once, not any time again. It is hard to say what the culprit is, some new pm-utils script maybe, since it happens even when I switch pm-utils to use the kernel method (echo mem) to suspend, and not uswsusp (s2ram prog). I would suggest keeping that bug closed until I have found the pm-utils or a specific culprit, then I can reopen it or open a new bug. (more disturbing are iwlagn bugs, they are a PITA without any progress) Best wishes Norbert ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Norbert Preining preining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org} JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ BLEAN Scientific measure of luminosity : 1 glimmer = 100,000 bleans. Usherettes' torches are designed to produce between 2.5 and 4 bleans, enabling them to assist you in falling downstairs, treading on people or putting your hand into a Neapolitan tub when reaching for change. --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds ` (15 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 15:12 ` Jesse Barnes -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Jesse Barnes @ 2010-07-09 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Bandiello, Frederic Weisbecker, Maciej Rutecki, Linux SCSI List, Enrico, Linux ACPI, Dave, Airlie, List, DRI, Rafael J. Wysocki, Norbert Preining, Al Viro, Jens Axboe, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, David S. Miller On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 18:34:25 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307 > > Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups > > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > > Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (13 days old) > > Message-ID : <4C26317A.5070309@postal.uv.es> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2 > > I don't think anybody noticed this one. Jesse? Oh I hadn't seen that... Enrico, can you bisect this issue? It could be some spurious hotplug events or possibly a stuck vblank interrupt... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265 > > Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? > > Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> > > Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (30 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c > > Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb@closure.thunk.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4 > > Dave, Jesse? I haven't looked at the switchable graphics stuff, hopefully Dave has an idea here. > Fixed by commit f4985dc714d7. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228 > > Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) > > Submitter : Brian Bloniarz <phunge0@hotmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (23 days old) > > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> > > This has a butt-ugly suggested patch that certainly won't be applied. > I saw the thread, but lost sight of it. Jesse, did that end up with > some resolution? I'll follow up with Yinghai, we were pretty clear about what we wanted from that patch. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? > > Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> > > Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 > > Hmm. That one is the vt.c bug coupled with another problem, which in > turn got opened as a separate bugzilla entry: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16252 > > which in turn then got closed. I dunno. Yeah, this is weird. Norbert, do you still see this? Have you tried to bisect it? -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds ` (16 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 15:12 ` Jesse Barnes -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Jesse Barnes @ 2010-07-09 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Bandiello, Frederic Weisbecker, Maciej Rutecki, Linux SCSI List, Enrico, Linux ACPI, Dave, Airlie, List, DRI, Norbert Preining, Al Viro, Jens Axboe, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, David S. Miller, Linux On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 18:34:25 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307 > > Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups > > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > > Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (13 days old) > > Message-ID : <4C26317A.5070309@postal.uv.es> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2 > > I don't think anybody noticed this one. Jesse? Oh I hadn't seen that... Enrico, can you bisect this issue? It could be some spurious hotplug events or possibly a stuck vblank interrupt... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265 > > Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? > > Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> > > Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (30 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c > > Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb@closure.thunk.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4 > > Dave, Jesse? I haven't looked at the switchable graphics stuff, hopefully Dave has an idea here. > Fixed by commit f4985dc714d7. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228 > > Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) > > Submitter : Brian Bloniarz <phunge0@hotmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (23 days old) > > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> > > This has a butt-ugly suggested patch that certainly won't be applied. > I saw the thread, but lost sight of it. Jesse, did that end up with > some resolution? I'll follow up with Yinghai, we were pretty clear about what we wanted from that patch. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? > > Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> > > Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 > > Hmm. That one is the vt.c bug coupled with another problem, which in > turn got opened as a separate bugzilla entry: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16252 > > which in turn then got closed. I dunno. Yeah, this is weird. Norbert, do you still see this? Have you tried to bisect it? -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds ` (17 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 21:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Jens Axboe, DRI, Linux SCSI List, Patrick McHardy, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Jesse Barnes, David S. Miller, Linux ACPI, Al Viro, Frederic Weisbecker, Dave Airlie, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Shawn Starr, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki On Friday, July 09, 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > > > Unresolved regressions > > ---------------------- > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 > > Subject : 2.6.35 regression > > Submitter : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old) > > Message-ID : <loom.20100705T144459-919@post.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2 > > This is a gcc-4.5 issue. Whether it's also something that we should > change in the kernel is unclear, but at least as of now, the rule is > that you cannot compile the kernel with gcc-4.5. No idea whether the > compiler is just entirely broken, or whether it's just that it > triggers something iffy by being overly clever. This claims to fix it, though: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/110988/ > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16346 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-04 22:04 (5 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTinof0k28rk4rMr66aubxcRL2rFa5ZEArj1lqD3o@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127828107815930&w=2 > > I'm not entirely sure if these RCU proving things should count as regressions. > > Sure, the option to enable RCU proving is new, but the things it > reports about generally are not new - and they are usually not even > bugs in the sense that they necessarily cause any real problems. > > That particular one is in the single-thread optimizated case for fget_light, ie > > if (likely((atomic_read(&files->count) == 1))) { > file = fcheck_files(files, fd); > > where I think it should be entirely safe in all ways without any > locking. So I think it's a false positive too. OK, so I'm going to close these bugs. ... > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16333 > > Subject : iwl3945: HARDWARE GONE?? > > Submitter : Priit Laes <plaes@plaes.org> > > Date : 2010-07-02 16:02 (7 days old) > > Message-ID : <1278086575.2889.8.camel@chi> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127808659705983&w=2 > > This either got fixed, or will be practically impossible to debug. The > reporter ends up being unable to reproduce the issue. Closed as unreproducible. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16330 > > Subject : Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3? > > Submitter : Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> > > Date : 2010-07-01 15:44 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : <201007011744.19564.trenn@suse.de> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127799907218877&w=2 > > There's a suggested patch in > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127862524404291&w=2 > > but no reply to it yet. Patch information added to the bug entry (it's been confirmed to work). > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16329 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3: Load average climbing to 3+ with no apparent reason: CPU 98% idle, with hardly no I/O > > Submitter : Török Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-01 7:40 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100701104022.404410d6@debian> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127797005030536&w=2 > > This seems to be partly a confusion about what "load average" is. It's > not a CPU load, it's a system load average, and disk-wait processes > count towards it. He has some problem with his CD-ROM, and it sounds > like it might be hardware on the verge of going bad. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16324 > > Subject : Oops while running fs_racer test on a POWER6 box against latest git > > Submitter : divya <dipraksh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Date : 2010-06-30 11:34 (9 days old) > > Message-ID : <4C2B28F3.7000006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127789697303061&w=2 > > I wonder if this is the writeback problem. That POWER crash dump is > unreadable, so it's hard to tell, but the load in question makes that > at least likely. > > If so, it should hopefully be fixed in today's git (commit > 83ba7b071f30f7c01f72518ad72d5cd203c27502 and friends). OK, closed. > > Bug-entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16323 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-01 12:21 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTini6hz2LFeZi8CMUmY3xw1MU7NxmyesuxZ4oCdo@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2 > > See earlier about these being marked as regressions, but it should be > fixed by commit dc61b1d6 ("sched: Fix PROVE_RCU vs cpu_cgroup"). Closed. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16309 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 oops trying to suspend. > > Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-27 12:40 (12 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTinUH2p33-AWxOVDrLsNkn9rgEVrlwn5mfK7P8NH@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127764249926781&w=2 > > I'm pretty sure this was fixed by Nick in commit 57439f878afa ("fs: > fix superblock iteration race"). Closed. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16304 > > Subject : i915 - high number of wakeups > > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > > Date : 2010-06-27 09:52 (12 days old) > > Duplicate of that 16307 one. Closed. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16230 > > Subject : inconsistent IN-HARDIRQ-W -> HARDIRQ-ON-W usage: fasync, 2.6.35-rc3 > > Submitter : Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> > > Date : 2010-06-13 9:53 (26 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100613095305.GA13231@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127642282208277&w=2 > > Fixed by commit f4985dc714d7. Closed. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16205 > > Subject : acpi: freeing invalid memtype bf799000-bf79a000 > > Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-09 20:09 (30 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100609200910.GA2876@joi.lan> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611427029914&w=2 > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127688398513862&w=2 > > This should be fixed by commit b945d6b2554d ("rbtree: Undo augmented > trees performance damage and regression"). Yup, closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16199 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-07 18:14 (32 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTin2pPqOUx--9fIX3BH3e-cU6oCRufijcx_4ozx5@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127593447812015&w=2 > > Another RCU proving thing. And this one looks the same as the 16323 > one above, and fixed by the same commit as that one. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197 > > Subject : [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' > > Submitter : Ryan Wang <openspace.wang@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-07 0:23 (32 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTincwMZPnYW3S4uz4k2GOn52RpgBIBRfzyD010Yo@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127587022219378&w=2 > > These should all be gone. See commit 3be434f0244ee by Jesse ('Revert > "PCI: create function symlinks in /sys/bus/pci/slots/N/"'). Yes, I've already closed it. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free > > Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 > > Not a regression or a kernel bug at all. See the thread. Big ramdisk > filled up all of memory when it was filled by the builds. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145 > > Subject : Unable to boot unless "notsc" or "clocksource=hpet", or acpi_pad disabling the TSC > > Submitter : Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> > > Date : 2010-06-07 13:11 (32 days old) > > Handled-By : Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com> > > Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> > > This is not a regression. See the full bugzilla details. The same > problem persists at least back to 2.6.30 with his config. So it's > somehow specific to his particular config use that requires "notsc" to > boot. Dropped from the list. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds ` (18 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-07-09 21:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Jens Axboe, DRI, Linux SCSI List, Patrick McHardy, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Jesse Barnes, David S. Miller, Linux ACPI, Al Viro, Frederic Weisbecker, Dave Airlie, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Shawn Starr, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki On Friday, July 09, 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > > > Unresolved regressions > > ---------------------- > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 > > Subject : 2.6.35 regression > > Submitter : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old) > > Message-ID : <loom.20100705T144459-919@post.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2 > > This is a gcc-4.5 issue. Whether it's also something that we should > change in the kernel is unclear, but at least as of now, the rule is > that you cannot compile the kernel with gcc-4.5. No idea whether the > compiler is just entirely broken, or whether it's just that it > triggers something iffy by being overly clever. This claims to fix it, though: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/110988/ > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16346 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-04 22:04 (5 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTinof0k28rk4rMr66aubxcRL2rFa5ZEArj1lqD3o@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127828107815930&w=2 > > I'm not entirely sure if these RCU proving things should count as regressions. > > Sure, the option to enable RCU proving is new, but the things it > reports about generally are not new - and they are usually not even > bugs in the sense that they necessarily cause any real problems. > > That particular one is in the single-thread optimizated case for fget_light, ie > > if (likely((atomic_read(&files->count) == 1))) { > file = fcheck_files(files, fd); > > where I think it should be entirely safe in all ways without any > locking. So I think it's a false positive too. OK, so I'm going to close these bugs. ... > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16333 > > Subject : iwl3945: HARDWARE GONE?? > > Submitter : Priit Laes <plaes@plaes.org> > > Date : 2010-07-02 16:02 (7 days old) > > Message-ID : <1278086575.2889.8.camel@chi> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127808659705983&w=2 > > This either got fixed, or will be practically impossible to debug. The > reporter ends up being unable to reproduce the issue. Closed as unreproducible. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16330 > > Subject : Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3? > > Submitter : Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> > > Date : 2010-07-01 15:44 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : <201007011744.19564.trenn@suse.de> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127799907218877&w=2 > > There's a suggested patch in > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127862524404291&w=2 > > but no reply to it yet. Patch information added to the bug entry (it's been confirmed to work). > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16329 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3: Load average climbing to 3+ with no apparent reason: CPU 98% idle, with hardly no I/O > > Submitter : Török Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-01 7:40 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100701104022.404410d6@debian> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127797005030536&w=2 > > This seems to be partly a confusion about what "load average" is. It's > not a CPU load, it's a system load average, and disk-wait processes > count towards it. He has some problem with his CD-ROM, and it sounds > like it might be hardware on the verge of going bad. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16324 > > Subject : Oops while running fs_racer test on a POWER6 box against latest git > > Submitter : divya <dipraksh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Date : 2010-06-30 11:34 (9 days old) > > Message-ID : <4C2B28F3.7000006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127789697303061&w=2 > > I wonder if this is the writeback problem. That POWER crash dump is > unreadable, so it's hard to tell, but the load in question makes that > at least likely. > > If so, it should hopefully be fixed in today's git (commit > 83ba7b071f30f7c01f72518ad72d5cd203c27502 and friends). OK, closed. > > Bug-entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16323 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-01 12:21 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTini6hz2LFeZi8CMUmY3xw1MU7NxmyesuxZ4oCdo@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2 > > See earlier about these being marked as regressions, but it should be > fixed by commit dc61b1d6 ("sched: Fix PROVE_RCU vs cpu_cgroup"). Closed. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16309 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 oops trying to suspend. > > Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-27 12:40 (12 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTinUH2p33-AWxOVDrLsNkn9rgEVrlwn5mfK7P8NH@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127764249926781&w=2 > > I'm pretty sure this was fixed by Nick in commit 57439f878afa ("fs: > fix superblock iteration race"). Closed. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16304 > > Subject : i915 - high number of wakeups > > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > > Date : 2010-06-27 09:52 (12 days old) > > Duplicate of that 16307 one. Closed. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16230 > > Subject : inconsistent IN-HARDIRQ-W -> HARDIRQ-ON-W usage: fasync, 2.6.35-rc3 > > Submitter : Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> > > Date : 2010-06-13 9:53 (26 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100613095305.GA13231@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127642282208277&w=2 > > Fixed by commit f4985dc714d7. Closed. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16205 > > Subject : acpi: freeing invalid memtype bf799000-bf79a000 > > Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-09 20:09 (30 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100609200910.GA2876@joi.lan> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611427029914&w=2 > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127688398513862&w=2 > > This should be fixed by commit b945d6b2554d ("rbtree: Undo augmented > trees performance damage and regression"). Yup, closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16199 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-07 18:14 (32 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTin2pPqOUx--9fIX3BH3e-cU6oCRufijcx_4ozx5@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127593447812015&w=2 > > Another RCU proving thing. And this one looks the same as the 16323 > one above, and fixed by the same commit as that one. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197 > > Subject : [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' > > Submitter : Ryan Wang <openspace.wang@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-07 0:23 (32 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTincwMZPnYW3S4uz4k2GOn52RpgBIBRfzyD010Yo@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127587022219378&w=2 > > These should all be gone. See commit 3be434f0244ee by Jesse ('Revert > "PCI: create function symlinks in /sys/bus/pci/slots/N/"'). Yes, I've already closed it. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free > > Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 > > Not a regression or a kernel bug at all. See the thread. Big ramdisk > filled up all of memory when it was filled by the builds. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145 > > Subject : Unable to boot unless "notsc" or "clocksource=hpet", or acpi_pad disabling the TSC > > Submitter : Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> > > Date : 2010-06-07 13:11 (32 days old) > > Handled-By : Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com> > > Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> > > This is not a regression. See the full bugzilla details. The same > problem persists at least back to 2.6.30 with his config. So it's > somehow specific to his particular config use that requires "notsc" to > boot. Dropped from the list. Thanks, Rafael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first -- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-09 21:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI, Frederic Weisbecker, Al Viro, Shawn Starr, Jesse Barnes, Dave Airlie, David S. Miller, Patrick McHardy, Jens Axboe On Friday, July 09, 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > > > Unresolved regressions > > ---------------------- > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 > > Subject : 2.6.35 regression > > Submitter : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old) > > Message-ID : <loom.20100705T144459-919@post.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2 > > This is a gcc-4.5 issue. Whether it's also something that we should > change in the kernel is unclear, but at least as of now, the rule is > that you cannot compile the kernel with gcc-4.5. No idea whether the > compiler is just entirely broken, or whether it's just that it > triggers something iffy by being overly clever. This claims to fix it, though: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/110988/ > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16346 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-04 22:04 (5 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTinof0k28rk4rMr66aubxcRL2rFa5ZEArj1lqD3o@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127828107815930&w=2 > > I'm not entirely sure if these RCU proving things should count as regressions. > > Sure, the option to enable RCU proving is new, but the things it > reports about generally are not new - and they are usually not even > bugs in the sense that they necessarily cause any real problems. > > That particular one is in the single-thread optimizated case for fget_light, ie > > if (likely((atomic_read(&files->count) == 1))) { > file = fcheck_files(files, fd); > > where I think it should be entirely safe in all ways without any > locking. So I think it's a false positive too. OK, so I'm going to close these bugs. ... > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16333 > > Subject : iwl3945: HARDWARE GONE?? > > Submitter : Priit Laes <plaes@plaes.org> > > Date : 2010-07-02 16:02 (7 days old) > > Message-ID : <1278086575.2889.8.camel@chi> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127808659705983&w=2 > > This either got fixed, or will be practically impossible to debug. The > reporter ends up being unable to reproduce the issue. Closed as unreproducible. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16330 > > Subject : Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3? > > Submitter : Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> > > Date : 2010-07-01 15:44 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : <201007011744.19564.trenn@suse.de> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127799907218877&w=2 > > There's a suggested patch in > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127862524404291&w=2 > > but no reply to it yet. Patch information added to the bug entry (it's been confirmed to work). > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16329 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3: Load average climbing to 3+ with no apparent reason: CPU 98% idle, with hardly no I/O > > Submitter : Török Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-01 7:40 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100701104022.404410d6@debian> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127797005030536&w=2 > > This seems to be partly a confusion about what "load average" is. It's > not a CPU load, it's a system load average, and disk-wait processes > count towards it. He has some problem with his CD-ROM, and it sounds > like it might be hardware on the verge of going bad. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16324 > > Subject : Oops while running fs_racer test on a POWER6 box against latest git > > Submitter : divya <dipraksh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Date : 2010-06-30 11:34 (9 days old) > > Message-ID : <4C2B28F3.7000006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127789697303061&w=2 > > I wonder if this is the writeback problem. That POWER crash dump is > unreadable, so it's hard to tell, but the load in question makes that > at least likely. > > If so, it should hopefully be fixed in today's git (commit > 83ba7b071f30f7c01f72518ad72d5cd203c27502 and friends). OK, closed. > > Bug-entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16323 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-07-01 12:21 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTini6hz2LFeZi8CMUmY3xw1MU7NxmyesuxZ4oCdo@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2 > > See earlier about these being marked as regressions, but it should be > fixed by commit dc61b1d6 ("sched: Fix PROVE_RCU vs cpu_cgroup"). Closed. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16309 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 oops trying to suspend. > > Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-27 12:40 (12 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTinUH2p33-AWxOVDrLsNkn9rgEVrlwn5mfK7P8NH@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127764249926781&w=2 > > I'm pretty sure this was fixed by Nick in commit 57439f878afa ("fs: > fix superblock iteration race"). Closed. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16304 > > Subject : i915 - high number of wakeups > > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es> > > Date : 2010-06-27 09:52 (12 days old) > > Duplicate of that 16307 one. Closed. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16230 > > Subject : inconsistent IN-HARDIRQ-W -> HARDIRQ-ON-W usage: fasync, 2.6.35-rc3 > > Submitter : Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> > > Date : 2010-06-13 9:53 (26 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100613095305.GA13231@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127642282208277&w=2 > > Fixed by commit f4985dc714d7. Closed. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16205 > > Subject : acpi: freeing invalid memtype bf799000-bf79a000 > > Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-09 20:09 (30 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100609200910.GA2876@joi.lan> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611427029914&w=2 > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127688398513862&w=2 > > This should be fixed by commit b945d6b2554d ("rbtree: Undo augmented > trees performance damage and regression"). Yup, closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16199 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-07 18:14 (32 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTin2pPqOUx--9fIX3BH3e-cU6oCRufijcx_4ozx5@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127593447812015&w=2 > > Another RCU proving thing. And this one looks the same as the 16323 > one above, and fixed by the same commit as that one. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197 > > Subject : [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' > > Submitter : Ryan Wang <openspace.wang@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-07 0:23 (32 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTincwMZPnYW3S4uz4k2GOn52RpgBIBRfzyD010Yo@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127587022219378&w=2 > > These should all be gone. See commit 3be434f0244ee by Jesse ('Revert > "PCI: create function symlinks in /sys/bus/pci/slots/N/"'). Yes, I've already closed it. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free > > Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 > > Not a regression or a kernel bug at all. See the thread. Big ramdisk > filled up all of memory when it was filled by the builds. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145 > > Subject : Unable to boot unless "notsc" or "clocksource=hpet", or acpi_pad disabling the TSC > > Submitter : Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> > > Date : 2010-06-07 13:11 (32 days old) > > Handled-By : Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com> > > Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> > > This is not a regression. See the full bugzilla details. The same > problem persists at least back to 2.6.30 with his config. So it's > somehow specific to his particular config use that requires "notsc" to > boot. Dropped from the list. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 @ 2010-07-09 21:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-07-09 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI, Frederic Weisbecker, Al Viro, Shawn Starr, Jesse Barnes, Dave Airlie, David S. Miller, Patrick McHardy, Jens Axboe On Friday, July 09, 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > Unresolved regressions > > ---------------------- > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353 > > Subject : 2.6.35 regression > > Submitter : Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old) > > Message-ID : <loom.20100705T144459-919-eS7Uydv5nfjZ+VzJOa5vwg@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127836002702522&w=2 > > This is a gcc-4.5 issue. Whether it's also something that we should > change in the kernel is unclear, but at least as of now, the rule is > that you cannot compile the kernel with gcc-4.5. No idea whether the > compiler is just entirely broken, or whether it's just that it > triggers something iffy by being overly clever. This claims to fix it, though: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/110988/ > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16346 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-07-04 22:04 (5 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTinof0k28rk4rMr66aubxcRL2rFa5ZEArj1lqD3o@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127828107815930&w=2 > > I'm not entirely sure if these RCU proving things should count as regressions. > > Sure, the option to enable RCU proving is new, but the things it > reports about generally are not new - and they are usually not even > bugs in the sense that they necessarily cause any real problems. > > That particular one is in the single-thread optimizated case for fget_light, ie > > if (likely((atomic_read(&files->count) == 1))) { > file = fcheck_files(files, fd); > > where I think it should be entirely safe in all ways without any > locking. So I think it's a false positive too. OK, so I'm going to close these bugs. ... > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16333 > > Subject : iwl3945: HARDWARE GONE?? > > Submitter : Priit Laes <plaes-q/aMd4JkU83YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-07-02 16:02 (7 days old) > > Message-ID : <1278086575.2889.8.camel@chi> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127808659705983&w=2 > > This either got fixed, or will be practically impossible to debug. The > reporter ends up being unable to reproduce the issue. Closed as unreproducible. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16330 > > Subject : Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3? > > Submitter : Thomas Renninger <trenn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-07-01 15:44 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : <201007011744.19564.trenn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127799907218877&w=2 > > There's a suggested patch in > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127862524404291&w=2 > > but no reply to it yet. Patch information added to the bug entry (it's been confirmed to work). > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16329 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3: Load average climbing to 3+ with no apparent reason: CPU 98% idle, with hardly no I/O > > Submitter : Török Edwin <edwintorok-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-07-01 7:40 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100701104022.404410d6@debian> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127797005030536&w=2 > > This seems to be partly a confusion about what "load average" is. It's > not a CPU load, it's a system load average, and disk-wait processes > count towards it. He has some problem with his CD-ROM, and it sounds > like it might be hardware on the verge of going bad. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16324 > > Subject : Oops while running fs_racer test on a POWER6 box against latest git > > Submitter : divya <dipraksh-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-06-30 11:34 (9 days old) > > Message-ID : <4C2B28F3.7000006-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127789697303061&w=2 > > I wonder if this is the writeback problem. That POWER crash dump is > unreadable, so it's hard to tell, but the load in question makes that > at least likely. > > If so, it should hopefully be fixed in today's git (commit > 83ba7b071f30f7c01f72518ad72d5cd203c27502 and friends). OK, closed. > > Bug-entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16323 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-07-01 12:21 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTini6hz2LFeZi8CMUmY3xw1MU7NxmyesuxZ4oCdo@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2 > > See earlier about these being marked as regressions, but it should be > fixed by commit dc61b1d6 ("sched: Fix PROVE_RCU vs cpu_cgroup"). Closed. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16309 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 oops trying to suspend. > > Submitter : Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-06-27 12:40 (12 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTinUH2p33-AWxOVDrLsNkn9rgEVrlwn5mfK7P8NH@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127764249926781&w=2 > > I'm pretty sure this was fixed by Nick in commit 57439f878afa ("fs: > fix superblock iteration race"). Closed. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16304 > > Subject : i915 - high number of wakeups > > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-06-27 09:52 (12 days old) > > Duplicate of that 16307 one. Closed. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16230 > > Subject : inconsistent IN-HARDIRQ-W -> HARDIRQ-ON-W usage: fasync, 2.6.35-rc3 > > Submitter : Dominik Brodowski <linux-X3ehHDuj6sIIGcDfoQAp7OTW4wlIGRCZ@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-06-13 9:53 (26 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100613095305.GA13231-S7uyTPAaJ/sb6pqDj42GsMgv3T4z79SOs0AfqQuZ5sE@public.gmane.orgt> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127642282208277&w=2 > > Fixed by commit f4985dc714d7. Closed. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16205 > > Subject : acpi: freeing invalid memtype bf799000-bf79a000 > > Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-06-09 20:09 (30 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100609200910.GA2876-OI9uyE9O0yo@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611427029914&w=2 > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127688398513862&w=2 > > This should be fixed by commit b945d6b2554d ("rbtree: Undo augmented > trees performance damage and regression"). Yup, closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16199 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! > > Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-06-07 18:14 (32 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTin2pPqOUx--9fIX3BH3e-cU6oCRufijcx_4ozx5@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127593447812015&w=2 > > Another RCU proving thing. And this one looks the same as the 16323 > one above, and fixed by the same commit as that one. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197 > > Subject : [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' > > Submitter : Ryan Wang <openspace.wang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-06-07 0:23 (32 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTincwMZPnYW3S4uz4k2GOn52RpgBIBRfzyD010Yo@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127587022219378&w=2 > > These should all be gone. See commit 3be434f0244ee by Jesse ('Revert > "PCI: create function symlinks in /sys/bus/pci/slots/N/"'). Yes, I've already closed it. ... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free > > Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old) > > Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2 > > Not a regression or a kernel bug at all. See the thread. Big ramdisk > filled up all of memory when it was filled by the builds. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145 > > Subject : Unable to boot unless "notsc" or "clocksource=hpet", or acpi_pad disabling the TSC > > Submitter : Tom Gundersen <teg-B22kvLQNl6c@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-06-07 13:11 (32 days old) > > Handled-By : Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > > Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> > > This is not a regression. See the full bugzilla details. The same > problem persists at least back to 2.6.30 with his config. So it's > somehow specific to his particular config use that requires "notsc" to > boot. Dropped from the list. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34
@ 2010-06-20 22:11 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 187+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.34,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.34, please let us
know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know
if any of the entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
the issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2010-06-21 46 37 26
2010-06-09 15 13 10
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16255
Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 deadlocks on semaphore operations
Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Date : 2010-06-18 14:49 (3 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.00.1006180940140.11575@router.home>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127687262727707&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16248
Subject : inconsistent lock state
Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-15 11:24 (6 days old)
Message-ID : <20100615112434.GA3967@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127660087625903&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16247
Subject : drm/i915 BUG with 2.6.35-rc
Submitter : Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
Date : 2010-06-14 22:38 (7 days old)
Message-ID : <4C16AF56.1040002@panasas.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127655510531367&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16235
Subject : [REGRESSION] [IWL3945] Broadcast is broken?
Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-14 17:24 (7 days old)
Message-ID : <201006141924.24061.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127653628301300&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16234
Subject : [2.6.35-rc3] reboot mutex 'bug'...
Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-14 15:16 (7 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTimDcTnyEPmt2ZcCM1UWtn4AYKotiqyjobJApkO7@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127652861118933&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16232
Subject : 2.6.35-rc3 - WARNING:iwl_set_dynamic_key
Submitter : Mario Guenterberg <mario.guenterberg@googlemail.com>
Date : 2010-06-14 11:55 (7 days old)
Message-ID : <20100614115510.GA7904@guenti-laptop>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127651695627147&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16230
Subject : inconsistent IN-HARDIRQ-W -> HARDIRQ-ON-W usage: fasync, 2.6.35-rc3
Submitter : Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Date : 2010-06-13 9:53 (8 days old)
Message-ID : <20100613095305.GA13231@comet.dominikbrodowski.net>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127642282208277&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228
Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine)
Submitter : Brian Bloniarz <phunge0@hotmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (5 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16222
Subject : 2.6.35-rc{12} regression: inactive console corrupted
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-06-12 10:33 (9 days old)
Message-ID : <20100612103321.GA1458@ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127633882614501&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221
Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id
Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-11 20:31 (10 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTim0jVRyqkwlGOcrg_XTvUQwcBYfWJX-aRzkkrLG@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16205
Subject : acpi: freeing invalid memtype bf799000-bf79a000
Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-09 20:09 (12 days old)
Message-ID : <20100609200910.GA2876@joi.lan>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611427029914&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16201
Subject : SIOCGIWFREQ ioctl fails to get frequency info
Submitter : nuh <nuh@mailinator.net>
Date : 2010-06-14 10:45 (7 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16199
Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-07 18:14 (14 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTin2pPqOUx--9fIX3BH3e-cU6oCRufijcx_4ozx5@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127593447812015&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16198
Subject : Running make install over sshfs is painful now
Submitter : Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-07 6:53 (14 days old)
Message-ID : <20100607065324.GA25590@core.coreip.homeip.net>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127589362011138&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16197
Subject : [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot'
Submitter : Ryan Wang <openspace.wang@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-07 0:23 (14 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTincwMZPnYW3S4uz4k2GOn52RpgBIBRfzyD010Yo@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127587022219378&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184
Subject : Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule
Submitter : Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp@safe.ca>
Date : 2010-06-12 04:17 (9 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179
Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx?
Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (15 days old)
Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16178
Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 : OOPS with LTP memcg regression test run.
Submitter : Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
Date : 2010-06-06 15:18 (15 days old)
Message-ID : <4C0BB98E.9030101@in.ibm.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127583683912607&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16176
Subject : Microcode errors with iwl3945
Submitter : Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
Date : 2010-06-10 19:28 (11 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175
Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free
Submitter : andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-05 0:46 (16 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTim7CiW-yfugZUAHZCqLvXKgt9CwolCvbLGdCLAk@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127569877714937&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
Subject : After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
Submitter : David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net>
Date : 2010-06-09 23:25 (12 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16172
Subject : 2.6.25-rc1 ahci regression
Submitter : Luming Yu <luming.yu@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-03 7:02 (18 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/365cfa1ed5a36f9bcb9f64c9f0f52155af2e9fef
Message-ID : <AANLkTikWak8i-Kaj-e-EUFWE66tfMmp2UPhGJCKkK1zK@mail.gmail.com>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127554855724361&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16160
Subject : 2.6.35 Radeon KMS power management regression?
Submitter : Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au>
Date : 2010-06-01 6:23 (20 days old)
Message-ID : <4C04A767.8000209@crca.org.au>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127537343722290&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145
Subject : Unable to boot unless "notsc" or "clocksource=hpet", or acpi_pad disabling the TSC
Submitter : Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no>
Date : 2010-06-07 13:11 (14 days old)
Handled-By : Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122
Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170
Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (17 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16090
Subject : sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename
Submitter : Tobias <devnull@plzk.org>
Date : 2010-06-01 15:59 (20 days old)
Handled-By : Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16231
Subject : Noticeable slow-down in 2.6.35-rc3
Submitter : Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com>
Date : 2010-06-13 20:15 (8 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/597a264b1a9c7e36d1728f677c66c5c1f7e3b837
Message-ID : <AANLkTimDUf0N6b5PBy2wTGeAWEIY-lUvQPHQ7D7Gyrq4@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127646015226601&w=2
Handled-By : John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/105859/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16220
Subject : md/raid/udev fails to create md partition devices (/dev/mdXpY)
Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Date : 2010-06-15 17:19 (6 days old)
Handled-By : Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16220#c2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16215
Subject : sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/class/net/bnep0'
Submitter : Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl>
Date : 2010-06-15 14:55 (6 days old)
Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16215#c10
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16196
Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - WARNING: at net/wireless/mlme.c:341 cfg80211_send_assoc_timeout+0x107/0x11e [cfg80211]()
Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-07 19:06 (14 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTinmZh9GnrZLzOGi5Q_xHbky8cKdHAkOnsIA6_dZ@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127593758817428&w=2
Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=127608099427316&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16180
Subject : radeon regression with 2.6.35-rc2-00001-g386f40c: black screen after resume
Submitter : cedric <cedric@belbone.be>
Date : 2010-06-11 10:59 (10 days old)
Handled-By : Cedric Godin <cedric.godin@skynet.be>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26733
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16169
Subject : Complain from preemptive debug
Submitter : Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com>
Date : 2010-05-31 10:10 (21 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTilTnAAZIizKinYsxFkNTkrmPqk6XJJuUjjhJ7EP@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/31/77
Handled-By : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Patch : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01631.html
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16156
Subject : No Sound with 2.6.34.x Kernel with my Audio-Chip
Submitter : Ch: Hanisch <ch-hanisch@t-online.de>
Date : 2010-06-08 11:51 (13 days old)
Handled-By : Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26724
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16131
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4363 (btrfs_free_tree_block)
Submitter : Chow Loong Jin <hyperair@ubuntu.com>
Date : 2010-06-05 18:53 (16 days old)
Handled-By : Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com>
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/103235/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16127
Subject : Boot freeze on HP Compaq nx6325 (RS482) with Radeon KMS
Submitter : Jure Repinc <jlp.bugs@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-04 21:14 (17 days old)
Handled-By : Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26677
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16120
Subject : Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP, unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
Submitter : Alex Zhavnerchik <alex.vizor@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-04 09:25 (17 days old)
Handled-By : Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16120#c6
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16092
Subject : Caught 64-bit read from uninitialized memory in memtype_rb_augment_cb
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date : 2010-06-01 18:08 (20 days old)
Handled-By : Venki <venki@google.com>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16092#c2
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.34,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16055
Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that
should be added to the list in there.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread* [Bug #16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-06-20 22:11 2.6.35-rc3: " Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Larry Finger This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (17 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 @ 2010-06-20 22:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Larry Finger This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (17 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-06-20 22:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-21 2:22 ` Larry Finger -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Larry Finger @ 2010-06-21 2:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On 06/20/2010 05:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (17 days old) This is still present in rc3. Larry ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 @ 2010-06-21 2:22 ` Larry Finger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Larry Finger @ 2010-06-21 2:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On 06/20/2010 05:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (17 days old) This is still present in rc3. Larry ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 @ 2010-06-21 18:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-21 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Larry Finger Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Monday, June 21, 2010, Larry Finger wrote: > On 06/20/2010 05:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 > > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (17 days old) > > This is still present in rc3. Thanks for the update. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 @ 2010-06-21 18:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-21 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Larry Finger Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Monday, June 21, 2010, Larry Finger wrote: > On 06/20/2010 05:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 > > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (17 days old) > > This is still present in rc3. Thanks for the update. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* 2.6.35-rc2-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 @ 2010-06-08 22:06 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-06-08 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-08 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI [NOTES: * This by no means is a complete list, but we only put e-mail reports that are at least 1 week old into the Bugzilla. * Quite a few of the already reported regressions may be related to the bug fixed by 386f40c86d6c8d5b717ef20620af1a750d0dacb4 (Revert "tty: fix a little bug in scrup, vt.c"), so reporters please retest with this commit applied.] This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.34, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.34, please let us know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2010-06-09 15 13 10 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16163 Subject : [2.6.35-rc1 Regression] i915: Commit cfecde causes VGA to stay off Submitter : David John <davidjon@xenontk.org> Date : 2010-06-02 12:52 (7 days old) Message-ID : <4C065423.3000202@xenontk.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127548313828613&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16161 Subject : [2.6.35-rc1 regression] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename ... XVR-600 related? Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> Date : 2010-06-01 19:57 (8 days old) Message-ID : <19461.26166.427857.612983@pilspetsen.it.uu.se> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127542227511925&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16160 Subject : 2.6.35 Radeon KMS power management regression? Submitter : Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au> Date : 2010-06-01 6:23 (8 days old) Message-ID : <4C04A767.8000209@crca.org.au> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127537343722290&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145 Subject : Unable to boot after "ACPI: Don't let acpi_pad needlessly mark TSC unstable" Submitter : Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Date : 2010-06-07 13:11 (2 days old) Handled-By : Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16129 Subject : BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: jbd2/sda2 Submitter : Jan Kreuzer <kontrollator@gmx.de> Date : 2010-06-05 06:15 (4 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (5 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16120 Subject : Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP, unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null) Submitter : Alex Zhavnerchik <alex.vizor@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-04 09:25 (5 days old) Handled-By : Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16104 Subject : Radeon KMS does not start after merge of the new PM-Code Submitter : Jan Kreuzer <kontrollator@gmx.de> Date : 2010-06-02 07:47 (7 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16090 Subject : sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename Submitter : Tobias <devnull@plzk.org> Date : 2010-06-01 15:59 (8 days old) Handled-By : Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16037 Subject : NULL Pointer dereference in __ir_input_register/budget_ci_attach Submitter : Sean Finney <seanius@debian.org> Date : 2010-05-23 19:52 (17 days old) Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16131 Subject : kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4363 (btrfs_free_tree_block) Submitter : Chow Loong Jin <hyperair@ubuntu.com> Date : 2010-06-05 18:53 (4 days old) Handled-By : Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com> Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/103235/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16127 Subject : Boot freeze on HP Compaq nx6325 (RS482) with Radeon KMS Submitter : Jure Repinc <jlp.bugs@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-04 21:14 (5 days old) Handled-By : Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26677 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16092 Subject : Caught 64-bit read from uninitialized memory in memtype_rb_augment_cb Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> Date : 2010-06-01 18:08 (8 days old) Handled-By : Venki <venki@google.com> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16092#c2 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.34, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16055 Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-06-08 22:06 2.6.35-rc2-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-08 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-08 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Larry Finger This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (5 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 @ 2010-06-08 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-08 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Larry Finger This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (5 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-06-08 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-09 2:52 ` Larry Finger -1 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Larry Finger @ 2010-06-09 2:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On 06/08/2010 05:10 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (5 days old) Still present in 2.6.35-rc2. Larry ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 @ 2010-06-09 2:52 ` Larry Finger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Larry Finger @ 2010-06-09 2:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On 06/08/2010 05:10 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (5 days old) Still present in 2.6.35-rc2. Larry ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 @ 2010-06-09 8:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-09 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Larry Finger Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Larry Finger wrote: > On 06/08/2010 05:10 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 > > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (5 days old) > > Still present in 2.6.35-rc2. Thanks for the update. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 @ 2010-06-09 8:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-09 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Larry Finger Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Larry Finger wrote: > On 06/08/2010 05:10 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 > > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (5 days old) > > Still present in 2.6.35-rc2. Thanks for the update. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug 16122] New: 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170
@ 2010-06-04 13:18 bugzilla-daemon
2010-06-04 23:36 ` [Bug 16122] " bugzilla-daemon
` (16 more replies)
0 siblings, 17 replies; 187+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-04 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122
Summary: 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142
__mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170
Product: File System
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.35-rc1-00324-gad84563
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: ext3
AssignedTo: fs_ext3@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
ReportedBy: Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net
Regression: Yes
On booting, I get the following:
[ 16.480278] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 16.480288] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142
__mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170()
[ 16.480291] Hardware name: HP Pavilion dv2700 Notebook PC
[ 16.480293] Modules linked in: loop(+) dm_mod ide_cd_mod cdrom
snd_hda_codec_conexant arc4 ecb b43 ide_pci_generic rng_core mac80211 cfg80211
rfkill snd_hda_intel led_class snd_hda_codec ssb snd_pcm mmc_core snd_timer
amd74xx pcmcia k8temp snd i2c_nforce2 ide_core soundcore serio_raw hwmon sg
pcmcia_core joydev snd_page_alloc forcedeth i2c_core ac battery button ext3 jbd
mbcache ohci_hcd sd_mod ehci_hcd usbcore fan processor ahci libahci libata
scsi_mod thermal
[ 16.480344] Pid: 2432, comm: udisks-part-id Not tainted
2.6.35-rc1-Linus-00324-gad84563 #202
[ 16.480347] Call Trace:
[ 16.480354] [<ffffffff8104623a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7a/0xb0
[ 16.480358] [<ffffffff81046285>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x20
[ 16.480362] [<ffffffff81128f53>] __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170
[ 16.480367] [<ffffffff8111d6cd>] touch_atime+0x12d/0x170
[ 16.480372] [<ffffffff810ca131>] generic_file_aio_read+0x5c1/0x720
[ 16.480377] [<ffffffff810e49d8>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x718/0x8b0
[ 16.480381] [<ffffffff81107302>] do_sync_read+0xd2/0x110
[ 16.480387] [<ffffffff8107ab85>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x145/0x190
[ 16.480391] [<ffffffff8107abdd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[ 16.480394] [<ffffffff81107a23>] vfs_read+0xb3/0x170
[ 16.480399] [<ffffffff81002d1c>] ? sysret_check+0x27/0x62
[ 16.480403] [<ffffffff81107b2c>] sys_read+0x4c/0x80
[ 16.480407] [<ffffffff81002ceb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 16.480410] ---[ end trace f16a433c45bd0baa ]---
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread* [Bug 16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-06-04 13:18 [Bug 16122] New: " bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-04 23:36 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-04 23:53 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (15 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-04 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akpm@linux-foundation.org, | |axboe@kernel.dk --- Comment #1 from Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> 2010-06-04 23:36:46 --- Well, it's complaining that the underlying device's driver didn't call the secret, undocumented bdi_register(). Please describe the stack which underlies that ext3 filesystem so we can go hunt down the offending code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug 16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-06-04 13:18 [Bug 16122] New: " bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-04 23:36 ` [Bug 16122] " bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-04 23:53 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-05 0:48 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (14 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-04 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 --- Comment #2 from Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> 2010-06-04 23:53:32 --- My disk controller from lspci -nnk is 00:06.0 IDE interface [0101]: nVidia Corporation MCP67 IDE Controller [10de:0560] (rev a1) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:30d6] Kernel driver in use: AMD_IDE Is this what you need? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug 16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-06-04 13:18 [Bug 16122] New: " bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-04 23:36 ` [Bug 16122] " bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-04 23:53 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-05 0:48 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-05 3:13 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (13 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-05 0:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> 2010-06-05 00:48:35 --- OK, so it's a simple ext3-on-ide setup. No DM or loop or anything like that involved? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug 16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-06-04 13:18 [Bug 16122] New: " bugzilla-daemon ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2010-06-05 0:48 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-05 3:13 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-05 3:56 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (12 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-05 3:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 --- Comment #4 from Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> 2010-06-05 03:13:49 --- I do not think openSUSE 11.3 M7 uses a loop on boot. The dmesg output indicates that device-mapper was initialized 17 secs before the WARNING; however, I'm not using it. I will blacklist the DM modules and see if I still get the WARNING. The demesg output just prior to the WARNING is 11.996365] ssb: Sonics Silicon Backplane found on PCI device 0000:04:00.0 [ 12.148321] hda: host max PIO5 wanted PIO255(auto-tune) selected PIO4 [ 12.148661] hda: MWDMA2 mode selected [ 12.149177] ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 [ 12.150932] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LAZA] enabled at IRQ 20 [ 12.150948] HDA Intel 0000:00:07.0: PCI INT A -> Link[LAZA] -> GSI 20 (level, low) -> IRQ 20 [ 12.150953] hda_intel: Disable MSI for Nvidia chipset [ 12.151034] HDA Intel 0000:00:07.0: setting latency timer to 64 [ 12.290805] cfg80211: Calling CRDA to update world regulatory domain [ 12.301154] cfg80211: World regulatory domain updated: [ 12.301159] (start_freq - end_freq @ bandwidth), (max_antenna_gain, max_eirp) [ 12.301163] (2402000 KHz - 2472000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) [ 12.301166] (2457000 KHz - 2482000 KHz @ 20000 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) [ 12.301169] (2474000 KHz - 2494000 KHz @ 20000 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) [ 12.301171] (5170000 KHz - 5250000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) [ 12.301174] (5735000 KHz - 5835000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) [ 12.878617] b43-phy0: Broadcom 4312 WLAN found (core revision 15) [ 12.924045] b43-phy0 debug: Found PHY: Analog 6, Type 5, Revision 1 [ 12.924063] b43-phy0 debug: Found Radio: Manuf 0x17F, Version 0x2062, Revision 2 [ 13.064213] ide-cd driver 5.00 [ 13.067134] ide-cd: hda: ATAPI 24X DVD-ROM DVD-R/RAM CD-R/RW drive, 2048kB Cache [ 13.067143] Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20 [ 13.080677] phy0: Selected rate control algorithm 'minstrel' [ 13.084263] Registered led device: b43-phy0::tx [ 13.084435] Registered led device: b43-phy0::rx [ 13.084603] Registered led device: b43-phy0::radio [ 13.086455] Broadcom 43xx driver loaded [ Features: PMNLS, Firmware-ID: FW13 ] [ 13.275196] Adding 2104448k swap on /dev/sda5. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:2104448k [ 13.885398] device-mapper: ioctl: 4.17.0-ioctl (2010-03-05) initialised: dm-devel@redhat.com [ 30.302902] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 30.302912] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170() This boot was using the 2.6.35-rc1 kernel from Linville's wireless-testing tree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug 16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-06-04 13:18 [Bug 16122] New: " bugzilla-daemon ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2010-06-05 3:13 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-05 3:56 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-05 4:14 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (11 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-05 3:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> 2010-06-05 03:56:18 --- What does it say after the WARN trace? This: printk(KERN_ERR "bdi-%s not registered\n", bdi->name); -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug 16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-06-04 13:18 [Bug 16122] New: " bugzilla-daemon ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2010-06-05 3:56 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-05 4:14 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-05 4:23 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (10 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-05 4:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 --- Comment #6 from Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> 2010-06-05 04:14:19 --- It is "block". The messages are as follows: [ 30.303036] ---[ end trace a80f1425532f94da ]--- [ 30.303039] bdi-block not registered [ 30.325691] loop: module loaded [ 30.427469] EXT3-fs: barriers not enabled [ 30.438818] kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds [ 30.439197] EXT3-fs (sda7): using internal journal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug 16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-06-04 13:18 [Bug 16122] New: " bugzilla-daemon ` (5 preceding siblings ...) 2010-06-05 4:14 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-05 4:23 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-05 14:55 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (9 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-05 4:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> 2010-06-05 04:23:22 --- Well that's not much use - that's just the default value and all it tells us is that nobody called bdi_register(). Bah. That add_disk() fails to check the bdi_register_dev() return value doesn't help. Blah, over to you Jens! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug 16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-06-04 13:18 [Bug 16122] New: " bugzilla-daemon ` (6 preceding siblings ...) 2010-06-05 4:23 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-05 14:55 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-05 20:52 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (8 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-05 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 --- Comment #8 from Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> 2010-06-05 14:54:58 --- I'm willing to work on this, but don't know where to start. Is there a simple explanation of when and where bdi_register() should be called? I put a test of the returned value of bdi_register_dev() in add_disk(), but never got a non-zero result. BTW, is this snippet in bdi_register() correct? if (bdi->dev) /* The driver needs to use separate queues per device */ goto exit; This smells like an error, but returns zero. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug 16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-06-04 13:18 [Bug 16122] New: " bugzilla-daemon ` (7 preceding siblings ...) 2010-06-05 14:55 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-05 20:52 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-09 8:50 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (7 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-05 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |maciej.rutecki@gmail.com, | |rjw@sisk.pl Blocks| |16055 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug 16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-06-04 13:18 [Bug 16122] New: " bugzilla-daemon ` (8 preceding siblings ...) 2010-06-05 20:52 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-09 8:50 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-09 10:46 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (6 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-09 8:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 --- Comment #9 from Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> 2010-06-09 08:50:19 --- On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Larry Finger wrote: > On 06/08/2010 05:10 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 > > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (5 days old) > > Still present in 2.6.35-rc2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug 16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-06-04 13:18 [Bug 16122] New: " bugzilla-daemon ` (9 preceding siblings ...) 2010-06-09 8:50 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-09 10:46 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-09 18:31 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (5 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-09 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 --- Comment #10 from Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> 2010-06-09 10:45:50 --- This puzzles me... Larry, can you try .34? I don't think this is a regression from .34. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug 16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-06-04 13:18 [Bug 16122] New: " bugzilla-daemon ` (10 preceding siblings ...) 2010-06-09 10:46 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-09 18:31 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-21 18:41 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (4 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-09 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 --- Comment #11 from Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> 2010-06-09 18:31:02 --- I have the 2.6.34 kernel from wireless-testing, which should be the same a mainline, except for the wireless part. I never see this WARNING with that kernel, only from 2.6.35-rc1 onward. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug 16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-06-04 13:18 [Bug 16122] New: " bugzilla-daemon ` (11 preceding siblings ...) 2010-06-09 18:31 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-21 18:41 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-07-08 23:03 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (3 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-06-21 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 --- Comment #12 from Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> 2010-06-21 18:41:26 --- On Monday, June 21, 2010, Larry Finger wrote: > On 06/20/2010 05:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 > > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (17 days old) > > This is still present in rc3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug 16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-06-04 13:18 [Bug 16122] New: " bugzilla-daemon ` (12 preceding siblings ...) 2010-06-21 18:41 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-07-08 23:03 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-07-09 20:51 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (2 subsequent siblings) 16 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-07-08 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 --- Comment #13 from Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> 2010-07-08 23:03:07 --- Handled-By : Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug 16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-06-04 13:18 [Bug 16122] New: " bugzilla-daemon ` (13 preceding siblings ...) 2010-07-08 23:03 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-07-09 20:51 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-07-09 21:32 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-07-09 21:33 ` bugzilla-daemon 16 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-07-09 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 --- Comment #14 from Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> 2010-07-09 20:51:34 --- On Friday, July 09, 2010, Larry Finger wrote: > On 07/08/2010 06:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 > > Submitter : Larry Finger<Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > > Date : 2010-06-04 13:18 (35 days old) > > This bug is still present in 2.6.35-rc4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug 16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-06-04 13:18 [Bug 16122] New: " bugzilla-daemon ` (14 preceding siblings ...) 2010-07-09 20:51 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-07-09 21:32 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-07-09 21:33 ` bugzilla-daemon 16 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-07-09 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #15 from Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> 2010-07-09 21:32:53 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 16312 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
* [Bug 16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 2010-06-04 13:18 [Bug 16122] New: " bugzilla-daemon ` (15 preceding siblings ...) 2010-07-09 21:32 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-07-09 21:33 ` bugzilla-daemon 16 siblings, 0 replies; 187+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-07-09 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 187+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-20 15:26 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 187+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-07-08 23:33 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:33 ` [Bug #16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 1:19 ` Larry Finger 2010-07-09 1:19 ` Larry Finger 2010-07-09 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16173] After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16175] 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but memory not free Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 2:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 2010-07-09 2:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 2010-07-09 7:08 ` Andrew Hendry 2010-07-09 7:08 ` Andrew Hendry 2010-07-09 20:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 20:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16145] Unable to boot unless "notsc" or "clocksource=hpet", or acpi_pad disabling the TSC Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16169] Complain from preemptive debug Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 6:38 ` Sergey Senozhatsky 2010-07-09 6:38 ` Sergey Senozhatsky 2010-07-09 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16184] Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16179] 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16187] Carrier detection failed in dhcpcd when link is up Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16199] 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16215] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/class/net/bnep0' Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16205] acpi: freeing invalid memtype bf799000-bf79a000 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16197] [BUG on 2.6.35-rc2] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.0/0000:02:03.0/slot' Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 0:33 ` Jesse Barnes 2010-07-09 20:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 20:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16201] SIOCGIWFREQ ioctl fails to get frequency info Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16230] inconsistent IN-HARDIRQ-W -> HARDIRQ-ON-W usage: fasync, 2.6.35-rc3 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16228] BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16221] 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16255] 2.6.35-rc3 deadlocks on semaphore operations Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16232] 2.6.35-rc3 - WARNING:iwl_set_dynamic_key Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16234] [2.6.35-rc3] reboot mutex 'bug' Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16256] tpm_tis breaks suspend/hibernate on kernels > 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 6:23 ` Helmut Schaa 2010-07-09 6:23 ` Helmut Schaa 2010-07-09 20:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 20:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16257] sysfs changes break hwsim and bnep drivers Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16284] Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16288] kernel panic with iwlagn for Intel Wifi Link 5100 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16278] lvm snapshot causes deadlock in 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16271] 2.6.35-rc3 regression: IBM Maia system is unbootable [ACPI related?] Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16306] 2.6.35-rc3 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 cifs_show_options Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 0:49 ` Jeff Layton 2010-07-09 0:49 ` Jeff Layton 2010-07-09 1:03 ` Andrew Hendry 2010-07-09 1:03 ` Andrew Hendry 2010-07-09 20:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 20:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16304] i915 - high number of wakeups Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16294] [Q35 bisected] hang at init of i915 driver Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 0:45 ` Kees Cook 2010-07-09 0:45 ` Kees Cook 2010-07-09 20:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 20:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 21:12 ` Tim Gardner 2010-07-09 21:12 ` Tim Gardner 2010-07-09 21:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 21:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16307] i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16309] 2.6.35-rc3 oops trying to suspend Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16311] [REGRESSION][SUSPEND] 2.6.35-rcX won't suspend Lenovo W500 laptop Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 3:00 ` Shawn Starr 2010-07-09 21:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 21:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 22:29 ` Shawn Starr 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16310] arm omap invalid module format Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16322] WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70() Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16332] Kernel crashes in tty code (tty_open) Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16329] 2.6.35-rc3: Load average climbing to 3+ with no apparent reason: CPU 98% idle, with hardly no I/O Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16333] iwl3945: HARDWARE GONE?? Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16330] Dynamic Debug broken on 2.6.35-rc3? Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16324] Oops while running fs_racer test on a POWER6 box against latest git Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16323] 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16334] reiserfs locking (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16346] 2.6.35-rc3-git8 - include/linux/fdtable.h:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` [Bug #16353] 2.6.35 regression Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 8:50 ` Zeev Tarantov 2010-07-09 8:50 ` Zeev Tarantov 2010-07-09 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 0:16 ` 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Sedat Dilek 2010-07-09 0:16 ` Sedat Dilek 2010-07-09 0:16 ` Sedat Dilek 2010-07-09 0:48 ` Andrew Hendry 2010-07-09 0:48 ` Andrew Hendry 2010-07-09 0:48 ` Andrew Hendry 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-07-09 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-07-09 2:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker 2010-07-09 2:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker 2010-07-09 2:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker 2010-07-09 21:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 21:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 21:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 2:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker 2010-07-09 2:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker 2010-07-09 2:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker 2010-07-09 2:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker 2010-07-09 3:36 ` Shawn Starr 2010-07-09 3:36 ` Shawn Starr 2010-07-20 0:33 ` Shawn Starr 2010-07-20 0:33 ` Shawn Starr 2010-07-20 1:12 ` Shawn Starr 2010-07-20 1:12 ` Shawn Starr 2010-07-20 2:13 ` Shawn Starr 2010-07-20 2:13 ` Shawn Starr 2010-07-20 15:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-20 15:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 3:36 ` Shawn Starr 2010-07-09 4:34 ` David Miller 2010-07-09 5:28 ` Eric Dumazet 2010-07-09 6:20 ` David Miller 2010-07-09 7:11 ` Ingo Molnar 2010-07-09 7:11 ` Ingo Molnar 2010-07-09 7:11 ` Ingo Molnar 2010-07-09 7:11 ` Ingo Molnar 2010-07-09 15:12 ` Jesse Barnes 2010-07-09 15:12 ` Jesse Barnes 2010-07-09 15:41 ` Enrico Bandiello 2010-07-09 17:01 ` Enrico Bandiello 2010-07-09 16:04 ` Norbert Preining 2010-07-09 21:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 21:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 16:04 ` Norbert Preining 2010-07-09 15:12 ` Jesse Barnes 2010-07-09 15:12 ` Jesse Barnes 2010-07-09 21:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 21:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 21:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-07-09 21:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2010-06-20 22:11 2.6.35-rc3: " Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-06-20 22:17 ` [Bug #16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-06-20 22:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-06-21 2:22 ` Larry Finger 2010-06-21 2:22 ` Larry Finger 2010-06-21 18:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-06-21 18:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-06-08 22:06 2.6.35-rc2-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-06-08 22:10 ` [Bug #16122] 2.6.35-rc1: WARNING at fs/fs-writeback.c:1142 __mark_inode_dirty+0x103/0x170 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-06-08 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-06-09 2:52 ` Larry Finger 2010-06-09 2:52 ` Larry Finger 2010-06-09 8:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-06-09 8:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-06-04 13:18 [Bug 16122] New: " bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-04 23:36 ` [Bug 16122] " bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-04 23:53 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-05 0:48 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-05 3:13 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-05 3:56 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-05 4:14 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-05 4:23 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-05 14:55 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-05 20:52 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-09 8:50 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-09 10:46 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-09 18:31 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-06-21 18:41 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-07-08 23:03 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-07-09 20:51 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-07-09 21:32 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-07-09 21:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.