All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Nai Xia <nai.xia@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Izik Eidus <izik.eidus@ravellosystems.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmu_notifier, kvm: Introduce dirty bit tracking in spte and mmu notifier to help KSM dirty bit tracking
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:00:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E028215.90107@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinRYr9Vg==C-qyCaRmO7C_aQqBPzw@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/22/2011 07:37 PM, Nai Xia wrote:

> On 2MB pages, I'd like to remind you and Rik that ksmd currently splits
> huge pages before their sub pages gets really merged to stable tree.

Your proposal appears to add a condition that causes ksmd to skip
doing that, which can cause the system to start using swap instead
of sharing memory.

> So when there are many 2MB pages each having a 4kB subpage
> changed for all time, this is already a concern for ksmd to judge
> if it's worthwhile to split 2MB page and get its sub-pages merged.
> I think the policy for ksmd in a system should be "If you cannot do sth good,
> at least do nothing evil". So I really don't think we can satisfy _all_ people.
> Get a general method and give users one or two knobs to tune it when they
> are the corner cases. How do  you think of my proposal ?

I think your proposal makes sense for 4kB pages, but the ksmd
policy for 2MB pages probably needs to be much more aggressive.

-- 
All rights reversed

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Nai Xia <nai.xia@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Izik Eidus <izik.eidus@ravellosystems.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmu_notifier, kvm: Introduce dirty bit tracking in spte and mmu notifier to help KSM dirty bit tracking
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:00:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E028215.90107@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinRYr9Vg==C-qyCaRmO7C_aQqBPzw@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/22/2011 07:37 PM, Nai Xia wrote:

> On 2MB pages, I'd like to remind you and Rik that ksmd currently splits
> huge pages before their sub pages gets really merged to stable tree.

Your proposal appears to add a condition that causes ksmd to skip
doing that, which can cause the system to start using swap instead
of sharing memory.

> So when there are many 2MB pages each having a 4kB subpage
> changed for all time, this is already a concern for ksmd to judge
> if it's worthwhile to split 2MB page and get its sub-pages merged.
> I think the policy for ksmd in a system should be "If you cannot do sth good,
> at least do nothing evil". So I really don't think we can satisfy _all_ people.
> Get a general method and give users one or two knobs to tune it when they
> are the corner cases. How do  you think of my proposal ?

I think your proposal makes sense for 4kB pages, but the ksmd
policy for 2MB pages probably needs to be much more aggressive.

-- 
All rights reversed

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-23  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-21 12:55 [PATCH 0/2 V2] ksm: take dirty bit as reference to avoid volatile pages scanning Nai Xia
2011-06-21 12:55 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-21 13:26 ` [PATCH 1/2 " Nai Xia
2011-06-21 13:26   ` Nai Xia
2011-06-21 21:42   ` Chris Wright
2011-06-21 21:42     ` Chris Wright
2011-06-22  0:02     ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22  0:02       ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22  0:42       ` Chris Wright
2011-06-22  0:42         ` Chris Wright
2011-06-21 13:32 ` [PATCH] mmu_notifier, kvm: Introduce dirty bit tracking in spte and mmu notifier to help KSM dirty bit tracking Nai Xia
2011-06-21 13:32   ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22  0:21   ` Chris Wright
2011-06-22  0:21     ` Chris Wright
2011-06-22  4:43     ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22  4:43       ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22  6:15     ` Izik Eidus
2011-06-22  6:15       ` Izik Eidus
2011-06-22  6:38       ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22  6:38         ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 15:46       ` Chris Wright
2011-06-22 15:46         ` Chris Wright
2011-06-22 10:43   ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 10:43     ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 11:05     ` Izik Eidus
2011-06-22 11:05       ` Izik Eidus
2011-06-22 11:10       ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 11:10         ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 11:19         ` Izik Eidus
2011-06-22 11:19           ` Izik Eidus
2011-06-22 11:24           ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 11:24             ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 11:28             ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 11:28               ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 11:31               ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 11:31                 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 11:33               ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 11:33                 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 11:39                 ` Izik Eidus
2011-06-22 11:39                   ` Izik Eidus
2011-06-22 15:39           ` Rik van Riel
2011-06-22 15:39             ` Rik van Riel
2011-06-22 16:55             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-22 16:55               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-22 23:37               ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 23:37                 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 23:59                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-22 23:59                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-23  0:31                   ` Nai Xia
2011-06-23  0:31                     ` Nai Xia
2011-06-23  0:44                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-23  0:44                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-23  1:36                       ` Nai Xia
2011-06-23  1:36                         ` Nai Xia
2011-06-23  0:00                 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2011-06-23  0:00                   ` Rik van Riel
2011-06-23  0:42                   ` Nai Xia
2011-06-23  0:42                     ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 23:13             ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 23:13               ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 23:25               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-22 23:25                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-23  1:30                 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-23  1:30                   ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 23:28               ` Rik van Riel
2011-06-22 23:28                 ` Rik van Riel
2011-06-23  0:52                 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-23  0:52                   ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 11:24     ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 15:03   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-22 15:03     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-22 15:19     ` Izik Eidus
2011-06-22 15:19       ` Izik Eidus
2011-06-22 23:19     ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 23:19       ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 23:44       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-22 23:44         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-23  0:14         ` Nai Xia
2011-06-23  0:14           ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 23:42     ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 23:42       ` Nai Xia
2011-06-21 13:36 ` [PATCH 2/2 V2] ksm: take dirty bit as reference to avoid volatile pages scanning Nai Xia
2011-06-21 13:36   ` Nai Xia
2011-06-21 22:38   ` Chris Wright
2011-06-21 22:38     ` Chris Wright
2011-06-22  0:04     ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22  0:04       ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22  0:35       ` Chris Wright
2011-06-22  0:35         ` Chris Wright
2011-06-22  4:47         ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22  4:47           ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 10:55         ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 10:55           ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22  0:46 ` [PATCH 0/2 " Chris Wright
2011-06-22  0:46   ` Chris Wright
2011-06-22  4:15   ` Nai Xia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E028215.90107@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=izik.eidus@ravellosystems.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nai.xia@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.