* Custom defconfig is not used
@ 2013-10-15 21:07 Diego Sueiro
2013-10-15 21:29 ` Katu Txakur
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 43+ messages in thread
From: Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-15 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yocto
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 925 bytes --]
Folks,
I created the following bbapend recipe for linux-mainline_3.8.bb (from
meta-beagleboard on dylan branch) for beaglebone.
meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend:
FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:"
SRC_URI += " file://0019-mine.patch \
file://defconfig \
"
But the defconfig and .config files on ${S} and ${WORKDIR} used are from
meta-beagleboad, not from my bbappend.
I tried to follow the instructions to add config fragments on the page
below but it did not worked too.
http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#changing-the-configuration
The strange thing is: My patch is applied but my defconfig, or config
fragment is not used.
I just want to add CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y.
I already did a cleasstate but no success.
Any hints?
Regards,
--
*dS
Diego Sueiro
/*long live rock 'n roll*/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1676 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-15 21:07 Custom defconfig is not used Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-15 21:29 ` Katu Txakur 2013-10-15 21:49 ` Rudolf Streif 2013-10-30 7:57 ` Jukka Rissanen 2 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread From: Katu Txakur @ 2013-10-15 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Diego Sueiro; +Cc: yocto [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1530 bytes --] Hi Diego, I may be wrong here, but I had a similar issue and I gave up. As I understand from https://www.yoctoproject.org/sites/yoctoproject.org/files/elc2013-kernel-lab.pdf if you are not using the linux-yocto kernel you need the whole defconfig. Anyway, reading the kernel lab is probably a good idea. good luck, Katu 2013/10/15 Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com> > Folks, > > I created the following bbapend recipe for linux-mainline_3.8.bb (from > meta-beagleboard on dylan branch) for beaglebone. > meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend: > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:" > SRC_URI += " file://0019-mine.patch \ > file://defconfig \ > " > > But the defconfig and .config files on ${S} and ${WORKDIR} used are from > meta-beagleboad, not from my bbappend. > > I tried to follow the instructions to add config fragments on the page > below but it did not worked too. > > http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#changing-the-configuration > > The strange thing is: My patch is applied but my defconfig, or config > fragment is not used. > I just want to add CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y. > > I already did a cleasstate but no success. > > Any hints? > > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2749 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-15 21:07 Custom defconfig is not used Diego Sueiro 2013-10-15 21:29 ` Katu Txakur @ 2013-10-15 21:49 ` Rudolf Streif 2013-10-15 21:55 ` Andrea Adami 2013-10-30 7:57 ` Jukka Rissanen 2 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Rudolf Streif @ 2013-10-15 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Diego Sueiro; +Cc: yocto [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1899 bytes --] Diego, You are appending a kernel recipe that uses the Linux Yocto tooling. The defconfig is essentially comprised of many different pieces from the meta branch of the Yocto kernel repository and optional configuration fragments that you provide. This tooling will not recognize a defconfig file you provide but it does recognize configuration fragments to be added to .config. You need to put CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y into a file that ends with .cfg eg. watchdog.cfg and then modify your bbappend to FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:" SRC_URI += " file://0019-mine.patch \ file://watchdog.cfg \ " Rudi On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com>wrote: > Folks, > > I created the following bbapend recipe for linux-mainline_3.8.bb (from > meta-beagleboard on dylan branch) for beaglebone. > meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend: > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:" > SRC_URI += " file://0019-mine.patch \ > file://defconfig \ > " > > But the defconfig and .config files on ${S} and ${WORKDIR} used are from > meta-beagleboad, not from my bbappend. > > I tried to follow the instructions to add config fragments on the page > below but it did not worked too. > > http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#changing-the-configuration > > The strange thing is: My patch is applied but my defconfig, or config > fragment is not used. > I just want to add CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y. > > I already did a cleasstate but no success. > > Any hints? > > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4305 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-15 21:49 ` Rudolf Streif @ 2013-10-15 21:55 ` Andrea Adami 2013-10-16 17:25 ` Diego Sueiro 0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Andrea Adami @ 2013-10-15 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rudolf Streif; +Cc: yocto Hi, I guess you're setting a wrong FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:" See this example, using simple defconfig for some devices and an experimental configuration (WIP ;) fo others using fragments. http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-handheld/tree/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.10.bbappend Cheers Andrea On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Rudolf Streif <rstreif@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Diego, > > You are appending a kernel recipe that uses the Linux Yocto tooling. The > defconfig is essentially comprised of many different pieces from the meta > branch of the Yocto kernel repository and optional configuration fragments > that you provide. This tooling will not recognize a defconfig file you > provide but it does recognize configuration fragments to be added to > .config. > > You need to put > > CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y > > into a file that ends with .cfg eg. watchdog.cfg and then modify your > bbappend to > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:" > SRC_URI += " file://0019-mine.patch \ > file://watchdog.cfg \ > " > > Rudi > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Folks, >> >> I created the following bbapend recipe for linux-mainline_3.8.bb (from >> meta-beagleboard on dylan branch) for beaglebone. >> meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend: >> >> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:" >> SRC_URI += " file://0019-mine.patch \ >> file://defconfig \ >> " >> >> But the defconfig and .config files on ${S} and ${WORKDIR} used are from >> meta-beagleboad, not from my bbappend. >> >> I tried to follow the instructions to add config fragments on the page >> below but it did not worked too. >> >> http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#changing-the-configuration >> >> The strange thing is: My patch is applied but my defconfig, or config >> fragment is not used. >> I just want to add CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y. >> >> I already did a cleasstate but no success. >> >> Any hints? >> >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> *dS >> Diego Sueiro >> >> /*long live rock 'n roll*/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> yocto mailing list >> yocto@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-15 21:55 ` Andrea Adami @ 2013-10-16 17:25 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-16 18:19 ` Diego Sueiro 0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-16 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrea Adami; +Cc: yocto, Rudolf Streif [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4069 bytes --] Guys, As I told before, I already tried the config fragment strategy and it did not worked too. Looking at linux-mailine-3.8.bb from meta-beagleboard[1] it just inherits kernel and not inherits linux-yocto or requires linux-yocto.inc. So I believe that the config fragment will not work. But I can be wrong. On directory "meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/" I have this: . ├── files │ ├── mine.patch │ └── defconfig └── linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend And my linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend recipe: FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:" SRC_URI += " file://mine.patch \ file://defconfig \ " The mine.patch is applied but defconfig not. I've already tried to use another FILESEXTRAPATHS layout like[2],but no success too. How can I have the "bb" command listed on the following link? http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/OE_FILESEXTRAPATHS [1] - https://github.com/beagleboard/meta-beagleboard/blob/dylan/common-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bb [2] - http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-handheld/tree/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.10.bbappend Regards, -- *dS Diego Sueiro /*long live rock 'n roll*/ 2013/10/15 Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com> > Hi, > > I guess you're setting a wrong FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := > "${THISDIR}/files:" > > See this example, using simple defconfig for some devices and an > experimental configuration (WIP ;) fo others using fragments. > > > http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-handheld/tree/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.10.bbappend > > Cheers > > Andrea > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Rudolf Streif > <rstreif@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > Diego, > > > > You are appending a kernel recipe that uses the Linux Yocto tooling. The > > defconfig is essentially comprised of many different pieces from the meta > > branch of the Yocto kernel repository and optional configuration > fragments > > that you provide. This tooling will not recognize a defconfig file you > > provide but it does recognize configuration fragments to be added to > > .config. > > > > You need to put > > > > CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y > > > > into a file that ends with .cfg eg. watchdog.cfg and then modify your > > bbappend to > > > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:" > > SRC_URI += " file://0019-mine.patch \ > > file://watchdog.cfg \ > > " > > > > Rudi > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> Folks, > >> > >> I created the following bbapend recipe for linux-mainline_3.8.bb (from > >> meta-beagleboard on dylan branch) for beaglebone. > >> meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend: > >> > >> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:" > >> SRC_URI += " file://0019-mine.patch \ > >> file://defconfig \ > >> " > >> > >> But the defconfig and .config files on ${S} and ${WORKDIR} used are from > >> meta-beagleboad, not from my bbappend. > >> > >> I tried to follow the instructions to add config fragments on the page > >> below but it did not worked too. > >> > >> > http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#changing-the-configuration > >> > >> The strange thing is: My patch is applied but my defconfig, or config > >> fragment is not used. > >> I just want to add CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y. > >> > >> I already did a cleasstate but no success. > >> > >> Any hints? > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> -- > >> *dS > >> Diego Sueiro > >> > >> /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> yocto mailing list > >> yocto@yoctoproject.org > >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > yocto mailing list > > yocto@yoctoproject.org > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6900 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-16 17:25 ` Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-16 18:19 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-17 3:56 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-16 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrea Adami; +Cc: yocto, Rudolf Streif [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5541 bytes --] Folks, Looking at log.do_unpack it shows: ... NOTE: Unpacking <...>/meta-beagleboard/common-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/beaglebone/defconfig to <...>/build/tmp-angstrom_v2013_06-eglibc/work/beaglebone-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/linux-mainline/3.8.13-r23a/ ... NOTE: Unpacking <...>/meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/mine.patch to <...>/build/tmp-angstrom_v2013_06-eglibc/work/beaglebone-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/linux-mainline/3.8.13-r23a/ NOTE: Unpacking <...>/meta-beagleboard/common-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/beaglebone/defconfig to <...>/build/tmp-angstrom_v2013_06-eglibc/work/beaglebone-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/linux-mainline/3.8.13-r23a/ Note that it copies defconfig from meta-beagleboard and in the end, instead copying mine, it is copying from meta-beagleboard again. My layer has the priority higher than meta-beagleboard. Abraços, -- *dS Diego Sueiro Administrador do Embarcados www.embarcados.com.br Engenheiro de Controle e Automação UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE ITAJUBÀ /*long live rock 'n roll*/ 2013/10/16 Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com> > Guys, > > As I told before, I already tried the config fragment strategy and it did > not worked too. > > Looking at linux-mailine-3.8.bb from meta-beagleboard[1] it just inherits > kernel and not inherits linux-yocto or requires linux-yocto.inc. So I > believe that the config fragment will not work. But I can be wrong. > > On directory "meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/" I have this: > > . > ├── files > │ ├── mine.patch > │ └── defconfig > └── linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend > > > And my linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend recipe: > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:" > SRC_URI += " file://mine.patch \ > file://defconfig \ > " > > The mine.patch is applied but defconfig not. > > I've already tried to use another FILESEXTRAPATHS layout like[2],but no > success too. > > How can I have the "bb" command listed on the following link? > http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/OE_FILESEXTRAPATHS > > > [1] - > https://github.com/beagleboard/meta-beagleboard/blob/dylan/common-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bb<https://github.com/beagleboard/meta-beagleboard/blob/dylan/common-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bb> > [2] - > http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-handheld/tree/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.10.bbappend > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > 2013/10/15 Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com> > >> Hi, >> >> I guess you're setting a wrong FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := >> "${THISDIR}/files:" >> >> See this example, using simple defconfig for some devices and an >> experimental configuration (WIP ;) fo others using fragments. >> >> >> http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-handheld/tree/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.10.bbappend >> >> Cheers >> >> Andrea >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Rudolf Streif >> <rstreif@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> > Diego, >> > >> > You are appending a kernel recipe that uses the Linux Yocto tooling. The >> > defconfig is essentially comprised of many different pieces from the >> meta >> > branch of the Yocto kernel repository and optional configuration >> fragments >> > that you provide. This tooling will not recognize a defconfig file you >> > provide but it does recognize configuration fragments to be added to >> > .config. >> > >> > You need to put >> > >> > CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y >> > >> > into a file that ends with .cfg eg. watchdog.cfg and then modify your >> > bbappend to >> > >> > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:" >> > SRC_URI += " file://0019-mine.patch \ >> > file://watchdog.cfg \ >> > " >> > >> > Rudi >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Folks, >> >> >> >> I created the following bbapend recipe for linux-mainline_3.8.bb (from >> >> meta-beagleboard on dylan branch) for beaglebone. >> >> meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend: >> >> >> >> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:" >> >> SRC_URI += " file://0019-mine.patch \ >> >> file://defconfig \ >> >> " >> >> >> >> But the defconfig and .config files on ${S} and ${WORKDIR} used are >> from >> >> meta-beagleboad, not from my bbappend. >> >> >> >> I tried to follow the instructions to add config fragments on the page >> >> below but it did not worked too. >> >> >> >> >> http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#changing-the-configuration >> >> >> >> The strange thing is: My patch is applied but my defconfig, or config >> >> fragment is not used. >> >> I just want to add CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y. >> >> >> >> I already did a cleasstate but no success. >> >> >> >> Any hints? >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> -- >> >> *dS >> >> Diego Sueiro >> >> >> >> /*long live rock 'n roll*/ >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> yocto mailing list >> >> yocto@yoctoproject.org >> >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > yocto mailing list >> > yocto@yoctoproject.org >> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >> > >> > > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 9057 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-16 18:19 ` Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-17 3:56 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-17 10:39 ` Diego Sueiro 0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-17 3:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Diego Sueiro; +Cc: yocto, Rudolf Streif On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com> wrote: > Folks, > > Looking at log.do_unpack it shows: > > ... > NOTE: Unpacking > <...>/meta-beagleboard/common-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/beaglebone/defconfig > to > <...>/build/tmp-angstrom_v2013_06-eglibc/work/beaglebone-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/linux-mainline/3.8.13-r23a/ > ... > > NOTE: Unpacking > <...>/meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/mine.patch to > <...>/build/tmp-angstrom_v2013_06-eglibc/work/beaglebone-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/linux-mainline/3.8.13-r23a/ > NOTE: Unpacking > <...>/meta-beagleboard/common-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/beaglebone/defconfig > to > <...>/build/tmp-angstrom_v2013_06-eglibc/work/beaglebone-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/linux-mainline/3.8.13-r23a/ > > > Note that it copies defconfig from meta-beagleboard and in the end, instead > copying mine, it is copying from meta-beagleboard again. > > My layer has the priority higher than meta-beagleboard. I can't get at my machines to test this myself (technically I'm still on vacation), but when you dump the bitbake environment, how many defconfig's show up in the SRC_URI ? It would be easy enough in your bbapend to simply call your defconfig something else (i.e. defconfig-mine) and override/append to kernel_do_configure() to simply copy yours over top of the .config, regardless of what the fetcher is doing with the SRC_URI. Bruce > > > > Abraços, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > Administrador do Embarcados > www.embarcados.com.br > > Engenheiro de Controle e Automação > UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE ITAJUBÀ > > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > 2013/10/16 Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com> >> >> Guys, >> >> As I told before, I already tried the config fragment strategy and it did >> not worked too. >> >> Looking at linux-mailine-3.8.bb from meta-beagleboard[1] it just inherits >> kernel and not inherits linux-yocto or requires linux-yocto.inc. So I >> believe that the config fragment will not work. But I can be wrong. >> >> On directory "meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/" I have this: >> >> . >> ├── files >> │ ├── mine.patch >> │ └── defconfig >> └── linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend >> >> >> And my linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend recipe: >> >> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:" >> SRC_URI += " file://mine.patch \ >> file://defconfig \ >> " >> >> The mine.patch is applied but defconfig not. >> >> I've already tried to use another FILESEXTRAPATHS layout like[2],but no >> success too. >> >> How can I have the "bb" command listed on the following link? >> http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/OE_FILESEXTRAPATHS >> >> >> [1] - >> https://github.com/beagleboard/meta-beagleboard/blob/dylan/common-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bb >> [2] - >> http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-handheld/tree/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.10.bbappend >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> *dS >> Diego Sueiro >> >> /*long live rock 'n roll*/ >> >> >> 2013/10/15 Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I guess you're setting a wrong FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := >>> "${THISDIR}/files:" >>> >>> See this example, using simple defconfig for some devices and an >>> experimental configuration (WIP ;) fo others using fragments. >>> >>> >>> http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-handheld/tree/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.10.bbappend >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Andrea >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Rudolf Streif >>> <rstreif@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >>> > Diego, >>> > >>> > You are appending a kernel recipe that uses the Linux Yocto tooling. >>> > The >>> > defconfig is essentially comprised of many different pieces from the >>> > meta >>> > branch of the Yocto kernel repository and optional configuration >>> > fragments >>> > that you provide. This tooling will not recognize a defconfig file you >>> > provide but it does recognize configuration fragments to be added to >>> > .config. >>> > >>> > You need to put >>> > >>> > CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y >>> > >>> > into a file that ends with .cfg eg. watchdog.cfg and then modify your >>> > bbappend to >>> > >>> > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:" >>> > SRC_URI += " file://0019-mine.patch \ >>> > file://watchdog.cfg \ >>> > " >>> > >>> > Rudi >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Folks, >>> >> >>> >> I created the following bbapend recipe for linux-mainline_3.8.bb (from >>> >> meta-beagleboard on dylan branch) for beaglebone. >>> >> meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend: >>> >> >>> >> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:" >>> >> SRC_URI += " file://0019-mine.patch \ >>> >> file://defconfig \ >>> >> " >>> >> >>> >> But the defconfig and .config files on ${S} and ${WORKDIR} used are >>> >> from >>> >> meta-beagleboad, not from my bbappend. >>> >> >>> >> I tried to follow the instructions to add config fragments on the page >>> >> below but it did not worked too. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#changing-the-configuration >>> >> >>> >> The strange thing is: My patch is applied but my defconfig, or config >>> >> fragment is not used. >>> >> I just want to add CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y. >>> >> >>> >> I already did a cleasstate but no success. >>> >> >>> >> Any hints? >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Regards, >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> *dS >>> >> Diego Sueiro >>> >> >>> >> /*long live rock 'n roll*/ >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> yocto mailing list >>> >> yocto@yoctoproject.org >>> >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > yocto mailing list >>> > yocto@yoctoproject.org >>> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >>> > >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-17 3:56 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-17 10:39 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-17 12:50 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-17 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: yocto, Rudolf Streif [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2028 bytes --] 2013/10/17 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Folks, > > > > Looking at log.do_unpack it shows: > > > > ... > > NOTE: Unpacking > > > <...>/meta-beagleboard/common-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/beaglebone/defconfig > > to > > > <...>/build/tmp-angstrom_v2013_06-eglibc/work/beaglebone-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/linux-mainline/3.8.13-r23a/ > > ... > > > > NOTE: Unpacking > > <...>/meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/mine.patch to > > > <...>/build/tmp-angstrom_v2013_06-eglibc/work/beaglebone-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/linux-mainline/3.8.13-r23a/ > > NOTE: Unpacking > > > <...>/meta-beagleboard/common-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/beaglebone/defconfig > > to > > > <...>/build/tmp-angstrom_v2013_06-eglibc/work/beaglebone-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/linux-mainline/3.8.13-r23a/ > > > > > > Note that it copies defconfig from meta-beagleboard and in the end, > instead > > copying mine, it is copying from meta-beagleboard again. > > > > My layer has the priority higher than meta-beagleboard. > > I can't get at my machines to test this myself (technically I'm still > on vacation), but when you > dump the bitbake environment, how many defconfig's show up in the > SRC_URI ? It would be > easy enough in your bbapend to simply call your defconfig something > else (i.e. defconfig-mine) > and override/append to kernel_do_configure() to simply copy yours over > top of the .config, > regardless of what the fetcher is doing with the SRC_URI. > > Bruce > > Bruce, Putting the following in my recipe did the trick: do_configure_prepend() { cp ${WORKDIR}/defconfig-mine ${WORKDIR}/defconfig } Now the .config is the same as my custom defconfig. But, this is a workaround, right? I expected to get this working "out-of-box". Why config fragments did not worked too? -- *dS Diego Sueiro /*long live rock 'n roll*/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3451 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-17 10:39 ` Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-17 12:50 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-17 13:15 ` Diego Sueiro 0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-17 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Diego Sueiro, Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: yocto, Rudolf Streif On 13-10-17 06:39 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: > > > > 2013/10/17 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com > <mailto:bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>> > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Diego Sueiro > <diego.sueiro@gmail.com <mailto:diego.sueiro@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Folks, > > > > Looking at log.do_unpack it shows: > > > > ... > > NOTE: Unpacking > > > <...>/meta-beagleboard/common-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/beaglebone/defconfig > > to > > > <...>/build/tmp-angstrom_v2013_06-eglibc/work/beaglebone-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/linux-mainline/3.8.13-r23a/ > > ... > > > > NOTE: Unpacking > > <...>/meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/mine.patch to > > > <...>/build/tmp-angstrom_v2013_06-eglibc/work/beaglebone-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/linux-mainline/3.8.13-r23a/ > > NOTE: Unpacking > > > <...>/meta-beagleboard/common-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/beaglebone/defconfig > > to > > > <...>/build/tmp-angstrom_v2013_06-eglibc/work/beaglebone-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/linux-mainline/3.8.13-r23a/ > > > > > > Note that it copies defconfig from meta-beagleboard and in the > end, instead > > copying mine, it is copying from meta-beagleboard again. > > > > My layer has the priority higher than meta-beagleboard. > > I can't get at my machines to test this myself (technically I'm still > on vacation), but when you > dump the bitbake environment, how many defconfig's show up in the > SRC_URI ? It would be > easy enough in your bbapend to simply call your defconfig something > else (i.e. defconfig-mine) > and override/append to kernel_do_configure() to simply copy yours over > top of the .config, > regardless of what the fetcher is doing with the SRC_URI. > > Bruce > > > Bruce, > > Putting the following in my recipe did the trick: > > do_configure_prepend() { > cp ${WORKDIR}/defconfig-mine ${WORKDIR}/defconfig > } > > > Now the .config is the same as my custom defconfig. > > But, this is a workaround, right? I could be. Until we root cause the issue, I can't say for sure. > I expected to get this working "out-of-box". Did you do a "bitbake -e <your kernel recipe>" ? and then look at the SRC_URI ? That will tell us if for some reason the beagle layer's defconfig is on there twice. > Why config fragments did not worked too? recipes must inherit linux-yocto to get that support, since it is optional and not something we force on all kernel recipes. So if you want fragment support, creating your own kernel recipe, based on the one in the layers you are using, which inherits linux-yocto is one route to take. Bruce > > > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-17 12:50 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-17 13:15 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-17 13:19 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-17 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: yocto, Rudolf Streif [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1160 bytes --] 2013/10/17 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> > > > I expected to get this working "out-of-box". >> > > Did you do a "bitbake -e <your kernel recipe>" ? and then look at > the SRC_URI ? That will tell us if for some reason the beagle layer's > defconfig is on there twice. I'll do it after my current build gets finished. > > > Why config fragments did not worked too? >> > > recipes must inherit linux-yocto to get that support, since it is > optional and not something we force on all kernel recipes. So if you > want fragment support, creating your own kernel recipe, based on the > one in the layers you are using, which inherits linux-yocto is one > route to take. Can I do it on bbappend, or do I need to copy the entirely linux-mainline_3.8.bb from meta-bleagleboard to my layer and add "inherit linux-yocto"? Do I need to "inherit linux-yocto", "require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc" or "inherit kernel-yocto"? My concern is: if doing this to just have the config fragment feature, I'll possibly mess up the kernel build. Regards, -- *dS Diego Sueiro /*long live rock 'n roll*/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2431 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-17 13:15 ` Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-17 13:19 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-17 13:51 ` Andrea Adami 2013-10-17 15:47 ` Diego Sueiro 0 siblings, 2 replies; 43+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-17 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Diego Sueiro; +Cc: yocto, Rudolf Streif On 13-10-17 09:15 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: > > 2013/10/17 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com > <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> > > > > I expected to get this working "out-of-box". > > > Did you do a "bitbake -e <your kernel recipe>" ? and then look at > the SRC_URI ? That will tell us if for some reason the beagle layer's > defconfig is on there twice. > > I'll do it after my current build gets finished. > > > > Why config fragments did not worked too? > > > recipes must inherit linux-yocto to get that support, since it is > optional and not something we force on all kernel recipes. So if you > want fragment support, creating your own kernel recipe, based on the > one in the layers you are using, which inherits linux-yocto is one > route to take. > > Can I do it on bbappend, or do I need to copy the entirely > linux-mainline_3.8.bb <http://linux-mainline_3.8.bb> from > meta-bleagleboard to my layer and add "inherit linux-yocto"? > Do I need to "inherit linux-yocto", "require > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc" or "inherit kernel-yocto"? Look at oe-core/meta-skeleton for the custom kernel recipe example. It has the inherit/include combinations that you need to follow. > My concern is: if doing this to just have the config fragment feature, > I'll possibly mess up the kernel build. It shouldn't. It only adds to existing phases, and doesn't make any changes. I've tested it in many combinations and it should work fine. If something breaks, I'd like to know, so we can fix it. Bruce > > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-17 13:19 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-17 13:51 ` Andrea Adami 2013-10-17 15:47 ` Diego Sueiro 1 sibling, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread From: Andrea Adami @ 2013-10-17 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: yocto, Rudolf Streif On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> wrote: > On 13-10-17 09:15 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: >> >> >> 2013/10/17 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com >> <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> >> >> >> >> >> I expected to get this working "out-of-box". >> >> >> Did you do a "bitbake -e <your kernel recipe>" ? and then look at >> the SRC_URI ? That will tell us if for some reason the beagle layer's >> defconfig is on there twice. >> >> I'll do it after my current build gets finished. >> >> >> >> Why config fragments did not worked too? >> >> >> recipes must inherit linux-yocto to get that support, since it is >> optional and not something we force on all kernel recipes. So if you >> want fragment support, creating your own kernel recipe, based on the >> one in the layers you are using, which inherits linux-yocto is one >> route to take. >> >> Can I do it on bbappend, or do I need to copy the entirely >> linux-mainline_3.8.bb <http://linux-mainline_3.8.bb> from >> >> meta-bleagleboard to my layer and add "inherit linux-yocto"? >> Do I need to "inherit linux-yocto", "require >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc" or "inherit kernel-yocto"? > > > Look at oe-core/meta-skeleton for the custom kernel recipe example. > It has the inherit/include combinations that you need to follow. > > >> My concern is: if doing this to just have the config fragment feature, >> I'll possibly mess up the kernel build. > > > It shouldn't. It only adds to existing phases, and doesn't make > any changes. I've tested it in many combinations and it should > work fine. > > If something breaks, I'd like to know, so we can fix it. > > Bruce > > >> >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> *dS >> Diego Sueiro >> >> /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto As a final note, the defconfig is overwritten by the do_configure_prepend() code in linux.inc. This is how kernel recipes did work before linux-yocto. Cheers Andrea ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-17 13:19 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-17 13:51 ` Andrea Adami @ 2013-10-17 15:47 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-18 4:48 ` Bruce Ashfield 1 sibling, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-17 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: yocto, Rudolf Streif [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2706 bytes --] 2013/10/17 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> > Look at oe-core/meta-skeleton for the custom kernel recipe example. > It has the inherit/include combinations that you need to follow. > > > My concern is: if doing this to just have the config fragment feature, >> I'll possibly mess up the kernel build. >> > > It shouldn't. It only adds to existing phases, and doesn't make > any changes. I've tested it in many combinations and it should > work fine. > > If something breaks, I'd like to know, so we can fix it. > Bruce, I didn't change linux-mainline_3.8.bb. My linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend is: FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" inherit kernel require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" SRC_URI += " file://mine.patch \ file://config-addons.cfg \ " My config-addons.cfg: CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y After a cleansstate the build got stucked on do_patch task. Here is the content of log.do_patch: DEBUG: Executing shell function do_patch WARNING: no meta data branch found ... Switched to branch 'linux-3.8.y' Running with bitbake -v I got the following: ... + configme --reconfig --output <...>/build/tmp-angstrom_v2013_06-eglibc/work/beaglebone-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/linux-mainline/3.8.13-r23a/linux-beaglebone-standard-build standard beaglebone [INFO] Configuring target/machine combo: "standard/beaglebone" [INFO] Configuring target/machine combo: "standard/beaglebone" [INFO] collecting configs in ./meta/meta-series [INFO] collecting configs in ./meta/meta-series cat: meta/cfg/standard/beaglebone/config_frag.txt: No such file or directory cat: meta/cfg/standard/beaglebone/config_frag.txt: No such file or directory cat: meta/cfg/standard/beaglebone/config_frag.txt: No such file or directory cat: meta/cfg/standard/beaglebone/config_frag.txt: No such file or directory mv: target `3.8.13' is not a directory mv: target `3.8.13' is not a directory creation of pre-processed config data failed config of "standard/beaglebone" failed creation of pre-processed config data failed config of "standard/beaglebone" failed ERROR: Function failed: do_kernel_configme (see <...>/build/tmp-angstrom_v2013_06-eglibc/work/beaglebone-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/linux-mainline/3.8.13-r23a/temp/log.do_kernel_configme15450. for further information) ERROR: Task 7 (<...>/setup-scripts/sources/meta-beagleboard/common-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/ linux-mainline_3.8.bb, do_kernel_configme) failed with exit code '1' Regards, -- *dS Diego Sueiro /*long live rock 'n roll*/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5705 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-17 15:47 ` Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-18 4:48 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-18 9:17 ` Diego Sueiro 0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-18 4:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Diego Sueiro; +Cc: yocto, Rudolf Streif On 13-10-17 11:47 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: > > 2013/10/17 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com > <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> > > Look at oe-core/meta-skeleton for the custom kernel recipe example. > It has the inherit/include combinations that you need to follow. > > > My concern is: if doing this to just have the config fragment > feature, > I'll possibly mess up the kernel build. > > > It shouldn't. It only adds to existing phases, and doesn't make > any changes. I've tested it in many combinations and it should > work fine. > > If something breaks, I'd like to know, so we can fix it. > > > Bruce, > > I didn't change linux-mainline_3.8.bb <http://linux-mainline_3.8.bb>. > My linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend is: > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" > inherit kernel > require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" > SRC_URI += " file://mine.patch \ > file://config-addons.cfg \ > " > > My config-addons.cfg: > > CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y > CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y > > After a cleansstate the build got stucked on do_patch task. > Here is the content of log.do_patch: > > DEBUG: Executing shell function do_patch > WARNING: no meta data branch found ... > Switched to branch 'linux-3.8.y' I fell behind today .. i had 2300 unread email to start this morning :) Is there a way that I can get a copy of your recipes and layers ? If I can do a build myself, I can easily debug and fix this .. otherwise, we'll go back and forth many times debugging. Cheers, Bruce > > > Running with bitbake -v I got the following: > > ... > + configme --reconfig --output > <...>/build/tmp-angstrom_v2013_06-eglibc/work/beaglebone-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/linux-mainline/3.8.13-r23a/linux-beaglebone-standard-build > standard beaglebone > [INFO] Configuring target/machine combo: "standard/beaglebone" > > [INFO] Configuring target/machine combo: "standard/beaglebone" > [INFO] collecting configs in ./meta/meta-series > > [INFO] collecting configs in ./meta/meta-series > cat: meta/cfg/standard/beaglebone/config_frag.txt: No such file or > directory > > cat: meta/cfg/standard/beaglebone/config_frag.txt: No such file or > directory > cat: meta/cfg/standard/beaglebone/config_frag.txt: No such file or > directory > > cat: meta/cfg/standard/beaglebone/config_frag.txt: No such file or > directory > mv: target `3.8.13' is not a directory > > mv: target `3.8.13' is not a directory > creation of pre-processed config data failed > config of "standard/beaglebone" failed > > creation of pre-processed config data failed > config of "standard/beaglebone" failed > ERROR: Function failed: do_kernel_configme (see > <...>/build/tmp-angstrom_v2013_06-eglibc/work/beaglebone-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/linux-mainline/3.8.13-r23a/temp/log.do_kernel_configme15450. > for further information) > ERROR: Task 7 > (<...>/setup-scripts/sources/meta-beagleboard/common-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bb > <http://linux-mainline_3.8.bb>, do_kernel_configme) failed with exit > code '1' > > > > > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-18 4:48 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-18 9:17 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-18 20:17 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-18 9:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: yocto, Rudolf Streif [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1803 bytes --] 2013/10/18 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> > I fell behind today .. i had 2300 unread email to start this morning :) > Is there a way that I can get a copy of your recipes and layers ? If > I can do a build myself, I can easily debug and fix this .. otherwise, > we'll > go back and forth many times debugging. > > Cheers, > > Bruce > I'm using the environment provided by Angstrom from it's github setup scripts. If you want to exactly reproduce it you need to: git clone https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/setup-scripts.git cd setup-scripts git checkout angstrom-v2013.06-yocto1.4 MACHINE=beaglebone ./oebb.sh config beaglebone Here is the setup and files for meta-mine: bblayers.conf: BBLAYERS = \" ... ${TOPDIR}/sources/meta-mine \ " meta-mine/conf/layer.conf: # We have a conf and classes directory, append to BBPATH BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" # We have a recipes directory, add to BBFILES BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bb ${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bbappend" BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "mine-layer" BBFILE_PATTERN_mine-layer := "^${LAYERDIR}/" BBFILE_PRIORITY_mine-layer = "10" LAYERDEPENDS_mine-layer = "angstrom-layer" meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend: FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" inherit kernel require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" SRC_URI += " file://config-addons.cfg " meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/config-addons.cfg: CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y But I think that instead of using the whole Angstrom you can just use poky and meta-beagleboard/common-bsp on dylan branch. Regards, -- *dS Diego Sueiro /*long live rock 'n roll*/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4530 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-18 9:17 ` Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-18 20:17 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-22 16:23 ` Mike Lewis 0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-18 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Diego Sueiro; +Cc: yocto, Rudolf Streif On 13-10-18 05:17 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: > > 2013/10/18 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com > <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> > > I fell behind today .. i had 2300 unread email to start this morning :) > Is there a way that I can get a copy of your recipes and layers ? If > I can do a build myself, I can easily debug and fix this .. > otherwise, we'll > go back and forth many times debugging. > > Cheers, > > Bruce > > > I'm using the environment provided by Angstrom from it's github setup > scripts. > If you want to exactly reproduce it you need to: > > git clone https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/setup-scripts.git > cd setup-scripts > git checkout angstrom-v2013.06-yocto1.4 > MACHINE=beaglebone ./oebb.sh config beaglebone > > Here is the setup and files for meta-mine: > > bblayers.conf: > > BBLAYERS = \" > > ... > ${TOPDIR}/sources/meta-mine \ > " > > meta-mine/conf/layer.conf: > > # We have a conf and classes directory, append to BBPATH > BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" > # We have a recipes directory, add to BBFILES > BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bb > ${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bbappend" > BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "mine-layer" > BBFILE_PATTERN_mine-layer := "^${LAYERDIR}/" > BBFILE_PRIORITY_mine-layer = "10" > LAYERDEPENDS_mine-layer = "angstrom-layer" > > meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend: > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" > inherit kernel > require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" > SRC_URI += " file://config-addons.cfg " > > meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/config-addons.cfg: > > CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y > CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y > > > > But I think that instead of using the whole Angstrom you can just use > poky and meta-beagleboard/common-bsp on dylan branch. Great. I'll launch some test builds and see what breaks (or works) :) Bruce > > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-18 20:17 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-22 16:23 ` Mike Lewis 2013-10-22 22:10 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-24 0:17 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 2 replies; 43+ messages in thread From: Mike Lewis @ 2013-10-22 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bruce.ashfield; +Cc: yocto Hi Bruce, I'm trying to accomplish the nearly the same thing (i.e. adding config fragment) and I'm having the same issue at the do_patch step. Were you able to reproduce this on your end? Thanks, Mike On 10/18/2013 01:17 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 13-10-18 05:17 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: >> >> 2013/10/18 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com >> <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> >> >> I fell behind today .. i had 2300 unread email to start this >> morning :) >> Is there a way that I can get a copy of your recipes and layers ? If >> I can do a build myself, I can easily debug and fix this .. >> otherwise, we'll >> go back and forth many times debugging. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Bruce >> >> >> I'm using the environment provided by Angstrom from it's github setup >> scripts. >> If you want to exactly reproduce it you need to: >> >> git clone https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/setup-scripts.git >> cd setup-scripts >> git checkout angstrom-v2013.06-yocto1.4 >> MACHINE=beaglebone ./oebb.sh config beaglebone >> >> Here is the setup and files for meta-mine: >> >> bblayers.conf: >> >> BBLAYERS = \" >> >> ... >> ${TOPDIR}/sources/meta-mine \ >> " >> >> meta-mine/conf/layer.conf: >> >> # We have a conf and classes directory, append to BBPATH >> BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" >> # We have a recipes directory, add to BBFILES >> BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bb >> ${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bbappend" >> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "mine-layer" >> BBFILE_PATTERN_mine-layer := "^${LAYERDIR}/" >> BBFILE_PRIORITY_mine-layer = "10" >> LAYERDEPENDS_mine-layer = "angstrom-layer" >> >> meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend: >> >> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" >> inherit kernel >> require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc >> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" >> SRC_URI += " file://config-addons.cfg " >> >> meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/config-addons.cfg: >> >> CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y >> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y >> CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y >> >> >> >> But I think that instead of using the whole Angstrom you can just use >> poky and meta-beagleboard/common-bsp on dylan branch. > > Great. I'll launch some test builds and see what breaks (or works) :) > > Bruce > >> >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> *dS >> Diego Sueiro >> >> /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-22 16:23 ` Mike Lewis @ 2013-10-22 22:10 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-24 0:17 ` Bruce Ashfield 1 sibling, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-22 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mike Lewis; +Cc: yocto On 13-10-22 12:23 PM, Mike Lewis wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > I'm trying to accomplish the nearly the same thing (i.e. adding config > fragment) and I'm having the same issue at the do_patch step. Were you > able to reproduce this on your end? I'm still working on it. I'm enroute to ELC-e in Scotland, so I had to cut my builds short and while in transit .. I haven't gotten back to it. That being said, this is my #1 isssue at the moment, so I'll be back to it shortly once I'm done getting screened by various security checkpoints :) Bruce > > Thanks, > Mike > > On 10/18/2013 01:17 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> On 13-10-18 05:17 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: >>> >>> 2013/10/18 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com >>> <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> >>> >>> I fell behind today .. i had 2300 unread email to start this >>> morning :) >>> Is there a way that I can get a copy of your recipes and layers ? If >>> I can do a build myself, I can easily debug and fix this .. >>> otherwise, we'll >>> go back and forth many times debugging. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Bruce >>> >>> >>> I'm using the environment provided by Angstrom from it's github setup >>> scripts. >>> If you want to exactly reproduce it you need to: >>> >>> git clone https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/setup-scripts.git >>> cd setup-scripts >>> git checkout angstrom-v2013.06-yocto1.4 >>> MACHINE=beaglebone ./oebb.sh config beaglebone >>> >>> Here is the setup and files for meta-mine: >>> >>> bblayers.conf: >>> >>> BBLAYERS = \" >>> >>> ... >>> ${TOPDIR}/sources/meta-mine \ >>> " >>> >>> meta-mine/conf/layer.conf: >>> >>> # We have a conf and classes directory, append to BBPATH >>> BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" >>> # We have a recipes directory, add to BBFILES >>> BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bb >>> ${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bbappend" >>> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "mine-layer" >>> BBFILE_PATTERN_mine-layer := "^${LAYERDIR}/" >>> BBFILE_PRIORITY_mine-layer = "10" >>> LAYERDEPENDS_mine-layer = "angstrom-layer" >>> >>> meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend: >>> >>> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" >>> inherit kernel >>> require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc >>> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" >>> SRC_URI += " file://config-addons.cfg " >>> >>> meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/config-addons.cfg: >>> >>> CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y >>> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y >>> CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y >>> >>> >>> >>> But I think that instead of using the whole Angstrom you can just use >>> poky and meta-beagleboard/common-bsp on dylan branch. >> >> Great. I'll launch some test builds and see what breaks (or works) :) >> >> Bruce >> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> -- >>> *dS >>> Diego Sueiro >>> >>> /*long live rock 'n roll*/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> yocto mailing list >> yocto@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-22 16:23 ` Mike Lewis 2013-10-22 22:10 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-24 0:17 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-25 11:43 ` Diego Sueiro 1 sibling, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-24 0:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mike Lewis; +Cc: yocto On 13-10-22 12:23 PM, Mike Lewis wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > I'm trying to accomplish the nearly the same thing (i.e. adding config > fragment) and I'm having the same issue at the do_patch step. Were you > able to reproduce this on your end? Mike, Is you config/layer somewhere than I can have a look at it ? I was trying some builds here, and my tests are working. But I'd like to try it with your config as well. Bruce > > Thanks, > Mike > > On 10/18/2013 01:17 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> On 13-10-18 05:17 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: >>> >>> 2013/10/18 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com >>> <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> >>> >>> I fell behind today .. i had 2300 unread email to start this >>> morning :) >>> Is there a way that I can get a copy of your recipes and layers ? If >>> I can do a build myself, I can easily debug and fix this .. >>> otherwise, we'll >>> go back and forth many times debugging. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Bruce >>> >>> >>> I'm using the environment provided by Angstrom from it's github setup >>> scripts. >>> If you want to exactly reproduce it you need to: >>> >>> git clone https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/setup-scripts.git >>> cd setup-scripts >>> git checkout angstrom-v2013.06-yocto1.4 >>> MACHINE=beaglebone ./oebb.sh config beaglebone >>> >>> Here is the setup and files for meta-mine: >>> >>> bblayers.conf: >>> >>> BBLAYERS = \" >>> >>> ... >>> ${TOPDIR}/sources/meta-mine \ >>> " >>> >>> meta-mine/conf/layer.conf: >>> >>> # We have a conf and classes directory, append to BBPATH >>> BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" >>> # We have a recipes directory, add to BBFILES >>> BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bb >>> ${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bbappend" >>> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "mine-layer" >>> BBFILE_PATTERN_mine-layer := "^${LAYERDIR}/" >>> BBFILE_PRIORITY_mine-layer = "10" >>> LAYERDEPENDS_mine-layer = "angstrom-layer" >>> >>> meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend: >>> >>> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" >>> inherit kernel >>> require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc >>> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" >>> SRC_URI += " file://config-addons.cfg " >>> >>> meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/config-addons.cfg: >>> >>> CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y >>> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y >>> CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y >>> >>> >>> >>> But I think that instead of using the whole Angstrom you can just use >>> poky and meta-beagleboard/common-bsp on dylan branch. >> >> Great. I'll launch some test builds and see what breaks (or works) :) >> >> Bruce >> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> -- >>> *dS >>> Diego Sueiro >>> >>> /*long live rock 'n roll*/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> yocto mailing list >> yocto@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-24 0:17 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-25 11:43 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-25 18:44 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-25 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: yocto [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4109 bytes --] Bruce, Regarding the defconfig not used, I've found this thread on Angstrom devel ML: http://www.mail-archive.com/angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org/msg06721.html I've replaced "FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend" with "FILESPATH_prepend" and removed the custom "do_configure_prepend" function and bitbake is now using my defconfig. So, it seems that there is an issue with FILESEXTRAPATHS variable. Regards, -- *dS Diego Sueiro /*long live rock 'n roll*/ 2013/10/23 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> > On 13-10-22 12:23 PM, Mike Lewis wrote: > >> Hi Bruce, >> >> I'm trying to accomplish the nearly the same thing (i.e. adding config >> fragment) and I'm having the same issue at the do_patch step. Were you >> able to reproduce this on your end? >> > > Mike, > > Is you config/layer somewhere than I can have a look at it ? I was trying > some builds here, and my tests are working. But I'd like to try it > with your config as well. > > Bruce > > > >> Thanks, >> Mike >> >> On 10/18/2013 01:17 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> >>> On 13-10-18 05:17 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> 2013/10/18 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com >>>> <mailto:bruce.ashfield@**windriver.com <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>>> >>>> >>>> I fell behind today .. i had 2300 unread email to start this >>>> morning :) >>>> Is there a way that I can get a copy of your recipes and layers ? If >>>> I can do a build myself, I can easily debug and fix this .. >>>> otherwise, we'll >>>> go back and forth many times debugging. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Bruce >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm using the environment provided by Angstrom from it's github setup >>>> scripts. >>>> If you want to exactly reproduce it you need to: >>>> >>>> git clone https://github.com/Angstrom-** >>>> distribution/setup-scripts.git<https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/setup-scripts.git> >>>> cd setup-scripts >>>> git checkout angstrom-v2013.06-yocto1.4 >>>> MACHINE=beaglebone ./oebb.sh config beaglebone >>>> >>>> Here is the setup and files for meta-mine: >>>> >>>> bblayers.conf: >>>> >>>> BBLAYERS = \" >>>> >>>> ... >>>> ${TOPDIR}/sources/meta-mine \ >>>> " >>>> >>>> meta-mine/conf/layer.conf: >>>> >>>> # We have a conf and classes directory, append to BBPATH >>>> BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" >>>> # We have a recipes directory, add to BBFILES >>>> BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bb >>>> ${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.**bbappend" >>>> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "mine-layer" >>>> BBFILE_PATTERN_mine-layer := "^${LAYERDIR}/" >>>> BBFILE_PRIORITY_mine-layer = "10" >>>> LAYERDEPENDS_mine-layer = "angstrom-layer" >>>> >>>> meta-mine/recipes-kernel/**linux/linux-mainline_3.8.**bbappend: >>>> >>>> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" >>>> inherit kernel >>>> require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-**yocto.inc >>>> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" >>>> SRC_URI += " file://config-addons.cfg " >>>> >>>> meta-mine/recipes-kernel/**linux/linux-mainline-3.8/** >>>> config-addons.cfg: >>>> >>>> CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y >>>> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y >>>> CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> But I think that instead of using the whole Angstrom you can just use >>>> poky and meta-beagleboard/common-bsp on dylan branch. >>>> >>> >>> Great. I'll launch some test builds and see what breaks (or works) :) >>> >>> Bruce >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *dS >>>> Diego Sueiro >>>> >>>> /*long live rock 'n roll*/ >>>> >>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> yocto mailing list >>> yocto@yoctoproject.org >>> https://lists.yoctoproject.**org/listinfo/yocto<https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto> >>> >> >> > ______________________________**_________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.**org/listinfo/yocto<https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto> > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6423 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-25 11:43 ` Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-25 18:44 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-26 1:19 ` Mike Lewis 0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-25 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Diego Sueiro; +Cc: yocto On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com> wrote: > Bruce, > > Regarding the defconfig not used, I've found this thread on Angstrom devel > ML: > http://www.mail-archive.com/angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org/msg06721.html > > I've replaced "FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend" with "FILESPATH_prepend" and removed > the custom "do_configure_prepend" function and bitbake is now using my > defconfig. > So, it seems that there is an issue with FILESEXTRAPATHS variable. > Aha. That does make sense. Mike: does that same change fix your issues ? Bruce > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > 2013/10/23 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> >> >> On 13-10-22 12:23 PM, Mike Lewis wrote: >>> >>> Hi Bruce, >>> >>> I'm trying to accomplish the nearly the same thing (i.e. adding config >>> fragment) and I'm having the same issue at the do_patch step. Were you >>> able to reproduce this on your end? >> >> >> Mike, >> >> Is you config/layer somewhere than I can have a look at it ? I was trying >> some builds here, and my tests are working. But I'd like to try it >> with your config as well. >> >> Bruce >> >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Mike >>> >>> On 10/18/2013 01:17 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>>> >>>> On 13-10-18 05:17 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2013/10/18 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com >>>>> <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> >>>>> >>>>> I fell behind today .. i had 2300 unread email to start this >>>>> morning :) >>>>> Is there a way that I can get a copy of your recipes and layers ? >>>>> If >>>>> I can do a build myself, I can easily debug and fix this .. >>>>> otherwise, we'll >>>>> go back and forth many times debugging. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Bruce >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm using the environment provided by Angstrom from it's github setup >>>>> scripts. >>>>> If you want to exactly reproduce it you need to: >>>>> >>>>> git clone >>>>> https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/setup-scripts.git >>>>> cd setup-scripts >>>>> git checkout angstrom-v2013.06-yocto1.4 >>>>> MACHINE=beaglebone ./oebb.sh config beaglebone >>>>> >>>>> Here is the setup and files for meta-mine: >>>>> >>>>> bblayers.conf: >>>>> >>>>> BBLAYERS = \" >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>> ${TOPDIR}/sources/meta-mine \ >>>>> " >>>>> >>>>> meta-mine/conf/layer.conf: >>>>> >>>>> # We have a conf and classes directory, append to BBPATH >>>>> BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" >>>>> # We have a recipes directory, add to BBFILES >>>>> BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bb >>>>> ${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bbappend" >>>>> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "mine-layer" >>>>> BBFILE_PATTERN_mine-layer := "^${LAYERDIR}/" >>>>> BBFILE_PRIORITY_mine-layer = "10" >>>>> LAYERDEPENDS_mine-layer = "angstrom-layer" >>>>> >>>>> meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend: >>>>> >>>>> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" >>>>> inherit kernel >>>>> require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc >>>>> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" >>>>> SRC_URI += " file://config-addons.cfg " >>>>> >>>>> meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/config-addons.cfg: >>>>> >>>>> CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y >>>>> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y >>>>> CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> But I think that instead of using the whole Angstrom you can just use >>>>> poky and meta-beagleboard/common-bsp on dylan branch. >>>> >>>> >>>> Great. I'll launch some test builds and see what breaks (or works) :) >>>> >>>> Bruce >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> *dS >>>>> Diego Sueiro >>>>> >>>>> /*long live rock 'n roll*/ >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> yocto mailing list >>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org >>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> yocto mailing list >> yocto@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > > > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-25 18:44 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-26 1:19 ` Mike Lewis 2013-10-26 10:57 ` Diego Sueiro 0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Mike Lewis @ 2013-10-26 1:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: yocto Bruce: yep, fixed my issue. Sorry for the bother! Diego: thanks for the solution! - Mike On 10/25/2013 11:44 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com> wrote: >> Bruce, >> >> Regarding the defconfig not used, I've found this thread on Angstrom devel >> ML: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org/msg06721.html >> >> I've replaced "FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend" with "FILESPATH_prepend" and removed >> the custom "do_configure_prepend" function and bitbake is now using my >> defconfig. >> So, it seems that there is an issue with FILESEXTRAPATHS variable. >> > Aha. That does make sense. > > Mike: does that same change fix your issues ? > > Bruce > >> Regards, >> >> -- >> *dS >> Diego Sueiro >> >> /*long live rock 'n roll*/ >> >> >> 2013/10/23 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> >>> On 13-10-22 12:23 PM, Mike Lewis wrote: >>>> Hi Bruce, >>>> >>>> I'm trying to accomplish the nearly the same thing (i.e. adding config >>>> fragment) and I'm having the same issue at the do_patch step. Were you >>>> able to reproduce this on your end? >>> >>> Mike, >>> >>> Is you config/layer somewhere than I can have a look at it ? I was trying >>> some builds here, and my tests are working. But I'd like to try it >>> with your config as well. >>> >>> Bruce >>> >>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Mike >>>> >>>> On 10/18/2013 01:17 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>>>> On 13-10-18 05:17 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> 2013/10/18 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com >>>>>> <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I fell behind today .. i had 2300 unread email to start this >>>>>> morning :) >>>>>> Is there a way that I can get a copy of your recipes and layers ? >>>>>> If >>>>>> I can do a build myself, I can easily debug and fix this .. >>>>>> otherwise, we'll >>>>>> go back and forth many times debugging. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> Bruce >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm using the environment provided by Angstrom from it's github setup >>>>>> scripts. >>>>>> If you want to exactly reproduce it you need to: >>>>>> >>>>>> git clone >>>>>> https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/setup-scripts.git >>>>>> cd setup-scripts >>>>>> git checkout angstrom-v2013.06-yocto1.4 >>>>>> MACHINE=beaglebone ./oebb.sh config beaglebone >>>>>> >>>>>> Here is the setup and files for meta-mine: >>>>>> >>>>>> bblayers.conf: >>>>>> >>>>>> BBLAYERS = \" >>>>>> >>>>>> ... >>>>>> ${TOPDIR}/sources/meta-mine \ >>>>>> " >>>>>> >>>>>> meta-mine/conf/layer.conf: >>>>>> >>>>>> # We have a conf and classes directory, append to BBPATH >>>>>> BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" >>>>>> # We have a recipes directory, add to BBFILES >>>>>> BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bb >>>>>> ${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bbappend" >>>>>> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "mine-layer" >>>>>> BBFILE_PATTERN_mine-layer := "^${LAYERDIR}/" >>>>>> BBFILE_PRIORITY_mine-layer = "10" >>>>>> LAYERDEPENDS_mine-layer = "angstrom-layer" >>>>>> >>>>>> meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend: >>>>>> >>>>>> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" >>>>>> inherit kernel >>>>>> require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc >>>>>> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" >>>>>> SRC_URI += " file://config-addons.cfg " >>>>>> >>>>>> meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/config-addons.cfg: >>>>>> >>>>>> CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y >>>>>> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y >>>>>> CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> But I think that instead of using the whole Angstrom you can just use >>>>>> poky and meta-beagleboard/common-bsp on dylan branch. >>>>> >>>>> Great. I'll launch some test builds and see what breaks (or works) :) >>>>> >>>>> Bruce >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> *dS >>>>>> Diego Sueiro >>>>>> >>>>>> /*long live rock 'n roll*/ >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> yocto mailing list >>>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org >>>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> yocto mailing list >>> yocto@yoctoproject.org >>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> yocto mailing list >> yocto@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >> > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-26 1:19 ` Mike Lewis @ 2013-10-26 10:57 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-26 14:54 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-28 20:58 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 2 replies; 43+ messages in thread From: Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-26 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mike Lewis; +Cc: yocto [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5886 bytes --] Bruce, We have two scenarios here: 1. bbapend with full defconfig replacement 2. bbapend with config fragments The first scenario just worked when using FILESPATH_prepend. For me it does not make sense, since on YP manual says that FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend must be use [1]. The second scenario did not worked even changing to FILESPATH_prepend. [1] - http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/mega-manual/mega-manual.html#var-FILESEXTRAPATHS Regards, -- *dS Diego Sueiro /*long live rock 'n roll*/ 2013/10/25 Mike Lewis <mikelewis@alphalem.com> > Bruce: yep, fixed my issue. Sorry for the bother! > > Diego: thanks for the solution! > > - Mike > > > On 10/25/2013 11:44 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Bruce, >>> >>> Regarding the defconfig not used, I've found this thread on Angstrom >>> devel >>> ML: >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/**angstrom-distro-devel@** >>> linuxtogo.org/msg06721.html<http://www.mail-archive.com/angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org/msg06721.html> >>> >>> I've replaced "FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend" with "FILESPATH_prepend" and >>> removed >>> the custom "do_configure_prepend" function and bitbake is now using my >>> defconfig. >>> So, it seems that there is an issue with FILESEXTRAPATHS variable. >>> >>> Aha. That does make sense. >> >> Mike: does that same change fix your issues ? >> >> Bruce >> >> Regards, >>> >>> -- >>> *dS >>> Diego Sueiro >>> >>> /*long live rock 'n roll*/ >>> >>> >>> 2013/10/23 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> >>> >>>> On 13-10-22 12:23 PM, Mike Lewis wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Bruce, >>>>> >>>>> I'm trying to accomplish the nearly the same thing (i.e. adding config >>>>> fragment) and I'm having the same issue at the do_patch step. Were you >>>>> able to reproduce this on your end? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Mike, >>>> >>>> Is you config/layer somewhere than I can have a look at it ? I was >>>> trying >>>> some builds here, and my tests are working. But I'd like to try it >>>> with your config as well. >>>> >>>> Bruce >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>>> Mike >>>>> >>>>> On 10/18/2013 01:17 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 13-10-18 05:17 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2013/10/18 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com >>>>>>> <mailto:bruce.ashfield@**windriver.com<bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I fell behind today .. i had 2300 unread email to start this >>>>>>> morning :) >>>>>>> Is there a way that I can get a copy of your recipes and layers >>>>>>> ? >>>>>>> If >>>>>>> I can do a build myself, I can easily debug and fix this .. >>>>>>> otherwise, we'll >>>>>>> go back and forth many times debugging. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bruce >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm using the environment provided by Angstrom from it's github setup >>>>>>> scripts. >>>>>>> If you want to exactly reproduce it you need to: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> git clone >>>>>>> https://github.com/Angstrom-**distribution/setup-scripts.git<https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/setup-scripts.git> >>>>>>> cd setup-scripts >>>>>>> git checkout angstrom-v2013.06-yocto1.4 >>>>>>> MACHINE=beaglebone ./oebb.sh config beaglebone >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here is the setup and files for meta-mine: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> bblayers.conf: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BBLAYERS = \" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>> ${TOPDIR}/sources/meta-mine \ >>>>>>> " >>>>>>> >>>>>>> meta-mine/conf/layer.conf: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> # We have a conf and classes directory, append to BBPATH >>>>>>> BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" >>>>>>> # We have a recipes directory, add to BBFILES >>>>>>> BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bb >>>>>>> ${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.**bbappend" >>>>>>> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "mine-layer" >>>>>>> BBFILE_PATTERN_mine-layer := "^${LAYERDIR}/" >>>>>>> BBFILE_PRIORITY_mine-layer = "10" >>>>>>> LAYERDEPENDS_mine-layer = "angstrom-layer" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> meta-mine/recipes-kernel/**linux/linux-mainline_3.8.**bbappend: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" >>>>>>> inherit kernel >>>>>>> require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-**yocto.inc >>>>>>> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" >>>>>>> SRC_URI += " file://config-addons.cfg " >>>>>>> >>>>>>> meta-mine/recipes-kernel/**linux/linux-mainline-3.8/** >>>>>>> config-addons.cfg: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y >>>>>>> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y >>>>>>> CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But I think that instead of using the whole Angstrom you can just use >>>>>>> poky and meta-beagleboard/common-bsp on dylan branch. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Great. I'll launch some test builds and see what breaks (or works) :) >>>>>> >>>>>> Bruce >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> *dS >>>>>>> Diego Sueiro >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /*long live rock 'n roll*/ >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>>>>> yocto mailing list >>>>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org >>>>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.**org/listinfo/yocto<https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>>> yocto mailing list >>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org >>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.**org/listinfo/yocto<https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto> >>>> >>> >>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> yocto mailing list >>> yocto@yoctoproject.org >>> https://lists.yoctoproject.**org/listinfo/yocto<https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto> >>> >>> >> >> > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 9426 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-26 10:57 ` Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-26 14:54 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-28 20:58 ` Bruce Ashfield 1 sibling, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-26 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Diego Sueiro, Mike Lewis; +Cc: yocto On 13-10-26 6:57 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: > Bruce, > > We have two scenarios here: > > 1. bbapend with full defconfig replacement > 2. bbapend with config fragments > > The first scenario just worked when using FILESPATH_prepend. For me it > does not make sense, since on YP manual says that > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend must be use [1]. > > The second scenario did not worked even changing to FILESPATH_prepend. > No problem. I'm going to continue looking into this, since we do want consistent behaviour with all the methods. Leave it with me and I'll take care of it, I just wanted to be sure you could move forward while I dig into things (now that I'm back in the office). Bruce > > [1] - > http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/mega-manual/mega-manual.html#var-FILESEXTRAPATHS > > > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > 2013/10/25 Mike Lewis <mikelewis@alphalem.com > <mailto:mikelewis@alphalem.com>> > > Bruce: yep, fixed my issue. Sorry for the bother! > > Diego: thanks for the solution! > > - Mike > > > On 10/25/2013 11:44 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Diego Sueiro > <diego.sueiro@gmail.com <mailto:diego.sueiro@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Bruce, > > Regarding the defconfig not used, I've found this thread on > Angstrom devel > ML: > http://www.mail-archive.com/__angstrom-distro-devel@__linuxtogo.org/msg06721.html > <http://www.mail-archive.com/angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org/msg06721.html> > > I've replaced "FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend" with > "FILESPATH_prepend" and removed > the custom "do_configure_prepend" function and bitbake is > now using my > defconfig. > So, it seems that there is an issue with FILESEXTRAPATHS > variable. > > Aha. That does make sense. > > Mike: does that same change fix your issues ? > > Bruce > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > 2013/10/23 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com > <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> > > On 13-10-22 12 <tel:13-10-22%2012>:23 PM, Mike Lewis wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > I'm trying to accomplish the nearly the same thing > (i.e. adding config > fragment) and I'm having the same issue at the > do_patch step. Were you > able to reproduce this on your end? > > > Mike, > > Is you config/layer somewhere than I can have a look at > it ? I was trying > some builds here, and my tests are working. But I'd like > to try it > with your config as well. > > Bruce > > > Thanks, > Mike > > On 10/18/2013 01:17 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On 13-10-18 05 <tel:13-10-18%2005>:17 AM, Diego > Sueiro wrote: > > > 2013/10/18 Bruce Ashfield > <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com > <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> > <mailto:bruce.ashfield@__windriver.com > <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>>> > > I fell behind today .. i had 2300 > unread email to start this > morning :) > Is there a way that I can get a copy > of your recipes and layers ? > If > I can do a build myself, I can easily > debug and fix this .. > otherwise, we'll > go back and forth many times debugging. > > Cheers, > > Bruce > > > I'm using the environment provided by > Angstrom from it's github setup > scripts. > If you want to exactly reproduce it you need to: > > git clone > https://github.com/Angstrom-__distribution/setup-scripts.git > <https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/setup-scripts.git> > cd setup-scripts > git checkout angstrom-v2013.06-yocto1.4 > MACHINE=beaglebone ./oebb.sh config > beaglebone > > Here is the setup and files for meta-mine: > > bblayers.conf: > > BBLAYERS = \" > > ... > ${TOPDIR}/sources/meta-mine \ > " > > meta-mine/conf/layer.conf: > > # We have a conf and classes > directory, append to BBPATH > BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" > # We have a recipes directory, add to > BBFILES > BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bb > ${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.__bbappend" > BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "mine-layer" > BBFILE_PATTERN_mine-layer := > "^${LAYERDIR}/" > BBFILE_PRIORITY_mine-layer = "10" > LAYERDEPENDS_mine-layer = "angstrom-layer" > > meta-mine/recipes-kernel/__linux/linux-mainline_3.8.__bbappend: > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := > "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" > inherit kernel > require > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__yocto.inc > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = > "(beaglebone)" > SRC_URI += " file://config-addons.cfg " > > meta-mine/recipes-kernel/__linux/linux-mainline-3.8/__config-addons.cfg: > > CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y > CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y > > > > But I think that instead of using the whole > Angstrom you can just use > poky and meta-beagleboard/common-bsp on > dylan branch. > > > Great. I'll launch some test builds and see what > breaks (or works) :) > > Bruce > > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > _________________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org> > https://lists.yoctoproject.__org/listinfo/yocto > <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto> > > > _________________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org> > https://lists.yoctoproject.__org/listinfo/yocto > <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto> > > > > _________________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org> > https://lists.yoctoproject.__org/listinfo/yocto > <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-26 10:57 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-26 14:54 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-28 20:58 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-28 21:41 ` Mike Lewis 2013-10-29 10:33 ` Diego Sueiro 1 sibling, 2 replies; 43+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-28 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Diego Sueiro, Mike Lewis; +Cc: yocto On 13-10-26 06:57 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: > Bruce, > > We have two scenarios here: > > 1. bbapend with full defconfig replacement > 2. bbapend with config fragments > > The first scenario just worked when using FILESPATH_prepend. For me it > does not make sense, since on YP manual says that > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend must be use [1]. > > The second scenario did not worked even changing to FILESPATH_prepend. I ran tests today, using the layers Mike indicated, since it was a bit easier for me to set up on top of my existing builds. I'm using dylan for my yocto checkout (not oe-core standalone, since this is a yocto list/question), My build shows: meta meta-yocto meta-yocto-bsp = "dylan:3dc4505f0e744177ae4ddff1e1ce8b31b95dfaa6" meta-ti = "master:c14c386946e1ea341faeea292580e37d538d645d" meta-alphalem = "master:a5c0e8ff51297a4090cd47d669b4fc9c94696908" meta-alphalem-bsp = "master:56086e4dc618e975c9a46491793041f0d18e47a2" Mike indicated that he was using dylan for meta-ti, but that doesn't make a difference either, since for our purposed. It's kernel.bbclass and the yocto kernel processing that matters. In meta-alphalem-bsp, I have linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend, with the following content: > cat linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.2:" inherit kernel require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(beagleboard)" SRC_URI_append = " file://defconfig" SRC_URI_append = " file://my_frag.cfg" And I added a fragment which has: > cat my_frag.cfg CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y When both are applied to the kernel build, we should see CONFIG_NTFS_FS transition from =m to =y: > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS * defconfig:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=m my_frag.cfg:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y After invoking linux-mainline's configure task, I see the following: > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS linux-beagleboard-standard-build/.config CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y And other elements of the defconfig and fragment are properly applied to the configuration phase. I'm also seeing good results on master, which means that I'm at a standstill to reproduce any problems. Diego: can you confirm for me what triggers you are seeing that shows the defconfig and fragment are not used. I assume the config options are not present, but I just want to be sure. Mike: what were you initially seeing that was different from my results ? Cheers, Bruce > > > [1] - > http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/mega-manual/mega-manual.html#var-FILESEXTRAPATHS > > > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > 2013/10/25 Mike Lewis <mikelewis@alphalem.com > <mailto:mikelewis@alphalem.com>> > > Bruce: yep, fixed my issue. Sorry for the bother! > > Diego: thanks for the solution! > > - Mike > > > On 10/25/2013 11:44 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Diego Sueiro > <diego.sueiro@gmail.com <mailto:diego.sueiro@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Bruce, > > Regarding the defconfig not used, I've found this thread on > Angstrom devel > ML: > http://www.mail-archive.com/__angstrom-distro-devel@__linuxtogo.org/msg06721.html > <http://www.mail-archive.com/angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org/msg06721.html> > > I've replaced "FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend" with > "FILESPATH_prepend" and removed > the custom "do_configure_prepend" function and bitbake is > now using my > defconfig. > So, it seems that there is an issue with FILESEXTRAPATHS > variable. > > Aha. That does make sense. > > Mike: does that same change fix your issues ? > > Bruce > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > 2013/10/23 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com > <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> > > On 13-10-22 12 <tel:13-10-22%2012>:23 PM, Mike Lewis wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > I'm trying to accomplish the nearly the same thing > (i.e. adding config > fragment) and I'm having the same issue at the > do_patch step. Were you > able to reproduce this on your end? > > > Mike, > > Is you config/layer somewhere than I can have a look at > it ? I was trying > some builds here, and my tests are working. But I'd like > to try it > with your config as well. > > Bruce > > > Thanks, > Mike > > On 10/18/2013 01:17 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On 13-10-18 05 <tel:13-10-18%2005>:17 AM, Diego > Sueiro wrote: > > > 2013/10/18 Bruce Ashfield > <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com > <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> > <mailto:bruce.ashfield@__windriver.com > <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>>> > > I fell behind today .. i had 2300 > unread email to start this > morning :) > Is there a way that I can get a copy > of your recipes and layers ? > If > I can do a build myself, I can easily > debug and fix this .. > otherwise, we'll > go back and forth many times debugging. > > Cheers, > > Bruce > > > I'm using the environment provided by > Angstrom from it's github setup > scripts. > If you want to exactly reproduce it you need to: > > git clone > https://github.com/Angstrom-__distribution/setup-scripts.git > <https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/setup-scripts.git> > cd setup-scripts > git checkout angstrom-v2013.06-yocto1.4 > MACHINE=beaglebone ./oebb.sh config > beaglebone > > Here is the setup and files for meta-mine: > > bblayers.conf: > > BBLAYERS = \" > > ... > ${TOPDIR}/sources/meta-mine \ > " > > meta-mine/conf/layer.conf: > > # We have a conf and classes > directory, append to BBPATH > BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" > # We have a recipes directory, add to > BBFILES > BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bb > ${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.__bbappend" > BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "mine-layer" > BBFILE_PATTERN_mine-layer := > "^${LAYERDIR}/" > BBFILE_PRIORITY_mine-layer = "10" > LAYERDEPENDS_mine-layer = "angstrom-layer" > > meta-mine/recipes-kernel/__linux/linux-mainline_3.8.__bbappend: > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := > "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" > inherit kernel > require > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__yocto.inc > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = > "(beaglebone)" > SRC_URI += " file://config-addons.cfg " > > meta-mine/recipes-kernel/__linux/linux-mainline-3.8/__config-addons.cfg: > > CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y > CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y > > > > But I think that instead of using the whole > Angstrom you can just use > poky and meta-beagleboard/common-bsp on > dylan branch. > > > Great. I'll launch some test builds and see what > breaks (or works) :) > > Bruce > > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > _________________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org> > https://lists.yoctoproject.__org/listinfo/yocto > <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto> > > > _________________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org> > https://lists.yoctoproject.__org/listinfo/yocto > <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto> > > > > _________________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org> > https://lists.yoctoproject.__org/listinfo/yocto > <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-28 20:58 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-28 21:41 ` Mike Lewis 2013-10-29 10:33 ` Diego Sueiro 1 sibling, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread From: Mike Lewis @ 2013-10-28 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: yocto Bruce, Thanks for running the tests. I was seeing neither my full defconfig (additions included) nor a .cfg with only my additions making it into the final config. Just the default beagleboard defconfig from meta-ti. I wasn't using yocto at the time I was experiencing the issue, so I'll add that back in and try to replicate your success. I thought that things would be simpler with fewer layers, but maybe that was the cause of the problem. - Mike On 10/28/2013 01:58 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 13-10-26 06:57 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: >> Bruce, >> >> We have two scenarios here: >> >> 1. bbapend with full defconfig replacement >> 2. bbapend with config fragments >> >> The first scenario just worked when using FILESPATH_prepend. For me it >> does not make sense, since on YP manual says that >> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend must be use [1]. >> >> The second scenario did not worked even changing to FILESPATH_prepend. > > I ran tests today, using the layers Mike indicated, since it was > a bit easier for me to set up on top of my existing builds. > > I'm using dylan for my yocto checkout (not oe-core standalone, since > this is a yocto list/question), > > My build shows: > > meta > meta-yocto > meta-yocto-bsp = "dylan:3dc4505f0e744177ae4ddff1e1ce8b31b95dfaa6" > meta-ti = "master:c14c386946e1ea341faeea292580e37d538d645d" > meta-alphalem = "master:a5c0e8ff51297a4090cd47d669b4fc9c94696908" > meta-alphalem-bsp = "master:56086e4dc618e975c9a46491793041f0d18e47a2" > > Mike indicated that he was using dylan for meta-ti, but that doesn't > make a difference either, since for our purposed. It's kernel.bbclass > and the yocto kernel processing that matters. > > In meta-alphalem-bsp, I have linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend, with the > following content: > > > cat linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.2:" > > inherit kernel > require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc > > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(beagleboard)" > > SRC_URI_append = " file://defconfig" > SRC_URI_append = " file://my_frag.cfg" > > And I added a fragment which has: > > > cat my_frag.cfg > CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y > CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y > > When both are applied to the kernel build, we should see CONFIG_NTFS_FS > transition from =m to =y: > > > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS * > defconfig:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=m > my_frag.cfg:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > > After invoking linux-mainline's configure task, I see the following: > > > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS linux-beagleboard-standard-build/.config > CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > > And other elements of the defconfig and fragment are properly applied > to the configuration phase. > > I'm also seeing good results on master, which means that I'm at a > standstill to reproduce any problems. > > Diego: can you confirm for me what triggers you are seeing that shows > the defconfig and fragment are not used. I assume the config options > are not present, but I just want to be sure. > > Mike: what were you initially seeing that was different from my results ? > > Cheers, > > Bruce > >> >> >> [1] - >> http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/mega-manual/mega-manual.html#var-FILESEXTRAPATHS >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> *dS >> Diego Sueiro >> >> /*long live rock 'n roll*/ >> >> >> 2013/10/25 Mike Lewis <mikelewis@alphalem.com >> <mailto:mikelewis@alphalem.com>> >> >> Bruce: yep, fixed my issue. Sorry for the bother! >> >> Diego: thanks for the solution! >> >> - Mike >> >> >> On 10/25/2013 11:44 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Diego Sueiro >> <diego.sueiro@gmail.com <mailto:diego.sueiro@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Bruce, >> >> Regarding the defconfig not used, I've found this thread on >> Angstrom devel >> ML: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/__angstrom-distro-devel@__linuxtogo.org/msg06721.html >> <http://www.mail-archive.com/angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org/msg06721.html> >> >> I've replaced "FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend" with >> "FILESPATH_prepend" and removed >> the custom "do_configure_prepend" function and bitbake is >> now using my >> defconfig. >> So, it seems that there is an issue with FILESEXTRAPATHS >> variable. >> >> Aha. That does make sense. >> >> Mike: does that same change fix your issues ? >> >> Bruce >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> *dS >> Diego Sueiro >> >> /*long live rock 'n roll*/ >> >> >> 2013/10/23 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com >> <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> >> >> On 13-10-22 12 <tel:13-10-22%2012>:23 PM, Mike Lewis >> wrote: >> >> Hi Bruce, >> >> I'm trying to accomplish the nearly the same thing >> (i.e. adding config >> fragment) and I'm having the same issue at the >> do_patch step. Were you >> able to reproduce this on your end? >> >> >> Mike, >> >> Is you config/layer somewhere than I can have a look at >> it ? I was trying >> some builds here, and my tests are working. But I'd like >> to try it >> with your config as well. >> >> Bruce >> >> >> Thanks, >> Mike >> >> On 10/18/2013 01:17 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> >> On 13-10-18 05 <tel:13-10-18%2005>:17 AM, Diego >> Sueiro wrote: >> >> >> 2013/10/18 Bruce Ashfield >> <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com >> <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> >> <mailto:bruce.ashfield@__windriver.com >> <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>>> >> >> I fell behind today .. i had 2300 >> unread email to start this >> morning :) >> Is there a way that I can get a copy >> of your recipes and layers ? >> If >> I can do a build myself, I can easily >> debug and fix this .. >> otherwise, we'll >> go back and forth many times >> debugging. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Bruce >> >> >> I'm using the environment provided by >> Angstrom from it's github setup >> scripts. >> If you want to exactly reproduce it you >> need to: >> >> git clone >> https://github.com/Angstrom-__distribution/setup-scripts.git >> <https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/setup-scripts.git> >> cd setup-scripts >> git checkout >> angstrom-v2013.06-yocto1.4 >> MACHINE=beaglebone ./oebb.sh config >> beaglebone >> >> Here is the setup and files for meta-mine: >> >> bblayers.conf: >> >> BBLAYERS = \" >> >> ... >> ${TOPDIR}/sources/meta-mine \ >> " >> >> meta-mine/conf/layer.conf: >> >> # We have a conf and classes >> directory, append to BBPATH >> BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" >> # We have a recipes directory, add to >> BBFILES >> BBFILES += >> "${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bb >> ${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.__bbappend" >> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "mine-layer" >> BBFILE_PATTERN_mine-layer := >> "^${LAYERDIR}/" >> BBFILE_PRIORITY_mine-layer = "10" >> LAYERDEPENDS_mine-layer = >> "angstrom-layer" >> >> meta-mine/recipes-kernel/__linux/linux-mainline_3.8.__bbappend: >> >> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := >> "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" >> inherit kernel >> require >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__yocto.inc >> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = >> "(beaglebone)" >> SRC_URI += " >> file://config-addons.cfg " >> >> meta-mine/recipes-kernel/__linux/linux-mainline-3.8/__config-addons.cfg: >> >> CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y >> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y >> CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y >> >> >> >> But I think that instead of using the whole >> Angstrom you can just use >> poky and meta-beagleboard/common-bsp on >> dylan branch. >> >> >> Great. I'll launch some test builds and see what >> breaks (or works) :) >> >> Bruce >> >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> *dS >> Diego Sueiro >> >> /*long live rock 'n roll*/ >> >> >> _________________________________________________ >> yocto mailing list >> yocto@yoctoproject.org >> <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org> >> https://lists.yoctoproject.__org/listinfo/yocto >> <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto> >> >> >> _________________________________________________ >> yocto mailing list >> yocto@yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org> >> https://lists.yoctoproject.__org/listinfo/yocto >> <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto> >> >> >> >> _________________________________________________ >> yocto mailing list >> yocto@yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org> >> https://lists.yoctoproject.__org/listinfo/yocto >> <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> yocto mailing list >> yocto@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-28 20:58 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-28 21:41 ` Mike Lewis @ 2013-10-29 10:33 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-29 11:00 ` Andrea Adami 1 sibling, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-29 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: yocto [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2510 bytes --] 2013/10/28 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> > I'm using dylan for my yocto checkout (not oe-core standalone, since > this is a yocto list/question), > I thought that opemenbedded-core and poky were sharing the same core components, classes and functions. > My build shows: > > meta > meta-yocto > meta-yocto-bsp = "dylan:**3dc4505f0e744177ae4ddff1e1ce8b**31b95dfaa6" > meta-ti = "master:**c14c386946e1ea341faeea292580e3**7d538d645d" > meta-alphalem = "master:**a5c0e8ff51297a4090cd47d669b4fc**9c94696908" > meta-alphalem-bsp = "master:**56086e4dc618e975c9a46491793041**f0d18e47a2" > > Mike indicated that he was using dylan for meta-ti, but that doesn't > make a difference either, since for our purposed. It's kernel.bbclass > and the yocto kernel processing that matters. > I'll build a setup with yocto (dylan), meta-beagleboard (dylan) and meta-mine to check if I can reproduce the issues. > In meta-alphalem-bsp, I have linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend, with the > following content: > > > cat linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.2:" > > inherit kernel > require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-**yocto.inc > > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(beagleboard)" > > SRC_URI_append = " file://defconfig" > SRC_URI_append = " file://my_frag.cfg" > > And I added a fragment which has: > > > cat my_frag.cfg > CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y > CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y > > When both are applied to the kernel build, we should see CONFIG_NTFS_FS > transition from =m to =y: > > > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS * > defconfig:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=m > my_frag.cfg:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > > After invoking linux-mainline's configure task, I see the following: > > > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS linux-beagleboard-standard-**build/.config > CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > > And other elements of the defconfig and fragment are properly applied > to the configuration phase. > > I'm also seeing good results on master, which means that I'm at a > standstill to reproduce any problems. > > Diego: can you confirm for me what triggers you are seeing that shows > the defconfig and fragment are not used. I assume the config options > are not present, but I just want to be sure. > For the full defconfig replacement after doing a do_configure I've checked .config on ${S} and it did not included my CONFIGS. For config fragment it got stuck on do_patch task. Regards, -- *dS Diego Sueiro /*long live rock 'n roll*/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3656 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-29 10:33 ` Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-29 11:00 ` Andrea Adami 2013-10-29 14:55 ` Diego Sueiro 0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Andrea Adami @ 2013-10-29 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Diego Sueiro; +Cc: yocto On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2013/10/28 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> >> >> I'm using dylan for my yocto checkout (not oe-core standalone, since >> this is a yocto list/question), > > I thought that opemenbedded-core and poky were sharing the same core > components, classes and functions. > >> >> My build shows: >> >> meta >> meta-yocto >> meta-yocto-bsp = "dylan:3dc4505f0e744177ae4ddff1e1ce8b31b95dfaa6" >> meta-ti = "master:c14c386946e1ea341faeea292580e37d538d645d" >> meta-alphalem = "master:a5c0e8ff51297a4090cd47d669b4fc9c94696908" >> meta-alphalem-bsp = "master:56086e4dc618e975c9a46491793041f0d18e47a2" >> >> Mike indicated that he was using dylan for meta-ti, but that doesn't >> make a difference either, since for our purposed. It's kernel.bbclass >> and the yocto kernel processing that matters. > > I'll build a setup with yocto (dylan), meta-beagleboard (dylan) and > meta-mine to check if I can reproduce the issues. > >> >> In meta-alphalem-bsp, I have linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend, with the >> following content: >> >> > cat linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend >> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.2:" >> >> inherit kernel >> require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc >> >> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(beagleboard)" >> >> SRC_URI_append = " file://defconfig" >> SRC_URI_append = " file://my_frag.cfg" >> >> And I added a fragment which has: >> >> > cat my_frag.cfg >> CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y >> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y >> CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y >> >> When both are applied to the kernel build, we should see CONFIG_NTFS_FS >> transition from =m to =y: >> >> > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS * >> defconfig:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=m >> my_frag.cfg:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y >> >> After invoking linux-mainline's configure task, I see the following: >> >> > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS linux-beagleboard-standard-build/.config >> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y >> >> And other elements of the defconfig and fragment are properly applied >> to the configuration phase. >> >> I'm also seeing good results on master, which means that I'm at a >> standstill to reproduce any problems. >> >> Diego: can you confirm for me what triggers you are seeing that shows >> the defconfig and fragment are not used. I assume the config options >> are not present, but I just want to be sure. > > For the full defconfig replacement after doing a do_configure I've checked > .config on ${S} and it did not included my CONFIGS. > For config fragment it got stuck on do_patch task. > > > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > I'll jump in one more time... Have you tried putting defconfig and patch under <machine> subdir? recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-3.2/<machine> defconfig my-own.patch I've recently added two similar entries for 3.10 and it works. Afaik it was impossible to put a common patch under /linux-yocto-.3.2 at the time. Regards Andrea ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-29 11:00 ` Andrea Adami @ 2013-10-29 14:55 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-29 15:31 ` Diego Sueiro 0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-29 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrea Adami; +Cc: yocto [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3996 bytes --] 2013/10/29 Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com> > I'll jump in one more time... > > Have you tried putting defconfig and patch under <machine> subdir? > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-3.2/<machine> > defconfig > my-own.patch > > I've recently added two similar entries for 3.10 and it works. > Afaik it was impossible to put a common patch under /linux-yocto-.3.2 > at the time. > Andrea, I did it before and not worked. I'll do it again just to make sure. Regards, -- *dS Diego Sueiro /*long live rock 'n roll*/ 2013/10/29 Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > 2013/10/28 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> > >> > >> I'm using dylan for my yocto checkout (not oe-core standalone, since > >> this is a yocto list/question), > > > > I thought that opemenbedded-core and poky were sharing the same core > > components, classes and functions. > > > >> > >> My build shows: > >> > >> meta > >> meta-yocto > >> meta-yocto-bsp = "dylan:3dc4505f0e744177ae4ddff1e1ce8b31b95dfaa6" > >> meta-ti = "master:c14c386946e1ea341faeea292580e37d538d645d" > >> meta-alphalem = "master:a5c0e8ff51297a4090cd47d669b4fc9c94696908" > >> meta-alphalem-bsp = "master:56086e4dc618e975c9a46491793041f0d18e47a2" > >> > >> Mike indicated that he was using dylan for meta-ti, but that doesn't > >> make a difference either, since for our purposed. It's kernel.bbclass > >> and the yocto kernel processing that matters. > > > > I'll build a setup with yocto (dylan), meta-beagleboard (dylan) and > > meta-mine to check if I can reproduce the issues. > > > >> > >> In meta-alphalem-bsp, I have linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend, with the > >> following content: > >> > >> > cat linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend > >> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.2:" > >> > >> inherit kernel > >> require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc > >> > >> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(beagleboard)" > >> > >> SRC_URI_append = " file://defconfig" > >> SRC_URI_append = " file://my_frag.cfg" > >> > >> And I added a fragment which has: > >> > >> > cat my_frag.cfg > >> CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y > >> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > >> CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y > >> > >> When both are applied to the kernel build, we should see CONFIG_NTFS_FS > >> transition from =m to =y: > >> > >> > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS * > >> defconfig:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=m > >> my_frag.cfg:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > >> > >> After invoking linux-mainline's configure task, I see the following: > >> > >> > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS linux-beagleboard-standard-build/.config > >> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > >> > >> And other elements of the defconfig and fragment are properly applied > >> to the configuration phase. > >> > >> I'm also seeing good results on master, which means that I'm at a > >> standstill to reproduce any problems. > >> > >> Diego: can you confirm for me what triggers you are seeing that shows > >> the defconfig and fragment are not used. I assume the config options > >> are not present, but I just want to be sure. > > > > For the full defconfig replacement after doing a do_configure I've > checked > > .config on ${S} and it did not included my CONFIGS. > > For config fragment it got stuck on do_patch task. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > *dS > > Diego Sueiro > > > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > yocto mailing list > > yocto@yoctoproject.org > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > > > I'll jump in one more time... > > Have you tried putting defconfig and patch under <machine> subdir? > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-3.2/<machine> > defconfig > my-own.patch > > I've recently added two similar entries for 3.10 and it works. > Afaik it was impossible to put a common patch under /linux-yocto-.3.2 > at the time. > > Regards > > Andrea > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6612 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-29 14:55 ` Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-29 15:31 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-30 13:04 ` Bruce Ashfield ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 43+ messages in thread From: Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-29 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrea Adami; +Cc: yocto [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6850 bytes --] Bruce, I've created new build setup with this configuration: BB_VERSION = "1.18.0" BUILD_SYS = "x86_64-linux" NATIVELSBSTRING = "Ubuntu-12.10" TARGET_SYS = "arm-poky-linux-gnueabi" MACHINE = "beaglebone" DISTRO = "poky" DISTRO_VERSION = "1.4.2" TUNE_FEATURES = "armv7a vfp neon" TARGET_FPU = "vfp-neon" meta meta-yocto meta-yocto-bsp = "dylan:4e399f08d596197859214fdb3b06403b87bf8789" meta-oe = "dylan:a108b2203a997634f87ac687e81712badaf3c546" common-bsp = "dylan:7fdf9c670a10c5031a2d5555c15c45e453de8c21" meta-mine = "dylan:4e399f08d596197859214fdb3b06403b87bf8789" common-bsp comes from meta-beagleboard. meta-oe needed to be added because of machine_kernel_pr.bbclass. bblayers.conf: LCONF_VERSION = "6" BBPATH = "${TOPDIR}" BBFILES ?= "" BBLAYERS ?= " \ ${TOPDIR}/meta \ ${TOPDIR}/meta-yocto \ ${TOPDIR}/meta-yocto-bsp \ ${TOPDIR}/meta-openembedded/meta-oe \ ${TOPDIR}/meta-beagleboard/common-bsp \ ${TOPDIR}/meta-mine \ " meta-mine: conf/layer.conf: BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bb ${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bbappend" BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "my-layer" BBFILE_PATTERN_my-layer := "^${LAYERDIR}/" BBFILE_PRIORITY_my-layer = "10" recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend (scenario 1): FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" SRC_URI += " file://defconfig \ " recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/defconfig (scenario 1): http://pastebin.com/qd8B3C5K recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend (scenario 2): FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" inherit kernel require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" SRC_URI += " file://config-addons.cfg \ " recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/config-addons.cfg (scenario 2): CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y Results: - Scenario 1: Full defconfig replacement ${WORKDIR}/defconfig comes from meta-beagleboard instead of meta-mine ${S}/.config comes from meta-beagleboard instead of meta-mine - Scenario 2: Config fragments "bitbake linux-mainline" got stuck on do_patch log.do_patch: DEBUG: Executing shell function do_patch WARNING: no meta data branch found ... Switched to branch 'linux-3.8.y' [INFO] validating against known patches (beaglebone-standard-meta) Regards, -- *dS Diego Sueiro /*long live rock 'n roll*/ 2013/10/29 Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com> > 2013/10/29 Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com> > >> I'll jump in one more time... >> >> Have you tried putting defconfig and patch under <machine> subdir? >> >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-3.2/<machine> >> defconfig >> my-own.patch >> >> I've recently added two similar entries for 3.10 and it works. >> Afaik it was impossible to put a common patch under /linux-yocto-.3.2 >> at the time. >> > > Andrea, > > I did it before and not worked. > I'll do it again just to make sure. > > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > 2013/10/29 Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com> > >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > 2013/10/28 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> >> >> >> >> I'm using dylan for my yocto checkout (not oe-core standalone, since >> >> this is a yocto list/question), >> > >> > I thought that opemenbedded-core and poky were sharing the same core >> > components, classes and functions. >> > >> >> >> >> My build shows: >> >> >> >> meta >> >> meta-yocto >> >> meta-yocto-bsp = "dylan:3dc4505f0e744177ae4ddff1e1ce8b31b95dfaa6" >> >> meta-ti = "master:c14c386946e1ea341faeea292580e37d538d645d" >> >> meta-alphalem = "master:a5c0e8ff51297a4090cd47d669b4fc9c94696908" >> >> meta-alphalem-bsp = "master:56086e4dc618e975c9a46491793041f0d18e47a2" >> >> >> >> Mike indicated that he was using dylan for meta-ti, but that doesn't >> >> make a difference either, since for our purposed. It's kernel.bbclass >> >> and the yocto kernel processing that matters. >> > >> > I'll build a setup with yocto (dylan), meta-beagleboard (dylan) and >> > meta-mine to check if I can reproduce the issues. >> > >> >> >> >> In meta-alphalem-bsp, I have linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend, with the >> >> following content: >> >> >> >> > cat linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend >> >> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.2:" >> >> >> >> inherit kernel >> >> require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc >> >> >> >> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(beagleboard)" >> >> >> >> SRC_URI_append = " file://defconfig" >> >> SRC_URI_append = " file://my_frag.cfg" >> >> >> >> And I added a fragment which has: >> >> >> >> > cat my_frag.cfg >> >> CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y >> >> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y >> >> CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y >> >> >> >> When both are applied to the kernel build, we should see CONFIG_NTFS_FS >> >> transition from =m to =y: >> >> >> >> > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS * >> >> defconfig:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=m >> >> my_frag.cfg:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y >> >> >> >> After invoking linux-mainline's configure task, I see the following: >> >> >> >> > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS linux-beagleboard-standard-build/.config >> >> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y >> >> >> >> And other elements of the defconfig and fragment are properly applied >> >> to the configuration phase. >> >> >> >> I'm also seeing good results on master, which means that I'm at a >> >> standstill to reproduce any problems. >> >> >> >> Diego: can you confirm for me what triggers you are seeing that shows >> >> the defconfig and fragment are not used. I assume the config options >> >> are not present, but I just want to be sure. >> > >> > For the full defconfig replacement after doing a do_configure I've >> checked >> > .config on ${S} and it did not included my CONFIGS. >> > For config fragment it got stuck on do_patch task. >> > >> > >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > -- >> > *dS >> > Diego Sueiro >> > >> > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > yocto mailing list >> > yocto@yoctoproject.org >> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >> > >> >> I'll jump in one more time... >> >> Have you tried putting defconfig and patch under <machine> subdir? >> >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-3.2/<machine> >> defconfig >> my-own.patch >> >> I've recently added two similar entries for 3.10 and it works. >> Afaik it was impossible to put a common patch under /linux-yocto-.3.2 >> at the time. >> >> Regards >> >> Andrea >> > > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 15148 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-29 15:31 ` Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-30 13:04 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-30 13:54 ` Bruce Ashfield ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-30 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Diego Sueiro, Andrea Adami; +Cc: yocto [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8855 bytes --] On 13-10-29 11:31 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: > Bruce, > > I've created new build setup with this configuration: > > BB_VERSION = "1.18.0" > BUILD_SYS = "x86_64-linux" > NATIVELSBSTRING = "Ubuntu-12.10" > TARGET_SYS = "arm-poky-linux-gnueabi" > MACHINE = "beaglebone" > DISTRO = "poky" > DISTRO_VERSION = "1.4.2" > TUNE_FEATURES = "armv7a vfp neon" > TARGET_FPU = "vfp-neon" > meta > meta-yocto > meta-yocto-bsp = "dylan:4e399f08d596197859214fdb3b06403b87bf8789" > meta-oe = "dylan:a108b2203a997634f87ac687e81712badaf3c546" > common-bsp = "dylan:7fdf9c670a10c5031a2d5555c15c45e453de8c21" > meta-mine = "dylan:4e399f08d596197859214fdb3b06403b87bf8789" > > common-bsp comes from meta-beagleboard. > meta-oe needed to be added because of machine_kernel_pr.bbclass. FYI: I've created this exactly environment on my builder. I'll follow up shortly with the results of the two scenarios. Honestly, I hope it breaks .. that'll make it much easier to debug :) Bruce > > bblayers.conf: > > LCONF_VERSION = "6" > BBPATH = "${TOPDIR}" > BBFILES ?= "" > BBLAYERS ?= " \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-yocto \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-yocto-bsp \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-openembedded/meta-oe \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-beagleboard/common-bsp \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-mine \ > " > > meta-mine: > > conf/layer.conf: > > BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" > BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bb > ${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bbappend" > BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "my-layer" > BBFILE_PATTERN_my-layer := "^${LAYERDIR}/" > BBFILE_PRIORITY_my-layer = "10" > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend (scenario 1): > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" > SRC_URI += " file://defconfig \ > " > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/defconfig (scenario 1): > > http://pastebin.com/qd8B3C5K > > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend (scenario 2): > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" > inherit kernel > require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" > SRC_URI += " file://config-addons.cfg \ > " > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/config-addons.cfg > (scenario 2): > > CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y > > CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y > > > > Results: > > * Scenario 1: Full defconfig replacement > > ${WORKDIR}/defconfig comes from meta-beagleboard instead of meta-mine > > ${S}/.config comes from meta-beagleboard instead of meta-mine > > * Scenario 2: Config fragments > > "bitbake linux-mainline" got stuck on do_patch > > log.do_patch: > > DEBUG: Executing shell function do_patch > > WARNING: no meta data branch found ... > > Switched to branch 'linux-3.8.y' > > [INFO] validating against known patches > (beaglebone-standard-meta) > > > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > 2013/10/29 Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com > <mailto:diego.sueiro@gmail.com>> > > 2013/10/29 Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com > <mailto:andrea.adami@gmail.com>> > > I'll jump in one more time... > > Have you tried putting defconfig and patch under <machine> subdir? > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-3.2/<machine> > defconfig > my-own.patch > > I've recently added two similar entries for 3.10 and it works. > Afaik it was impossible to put a common patch under > /linux-yocto-.3.2 > at the time. > > > Andrea, > > I did it before and not worked. > I'll do it again just to make sure. > > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > 2013/10/29 Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com > <mailto:andrea.adami@gmail.com>> > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Diego Sueiro > <diego.sueiro@gmail.com <mailto:diego.sueiro@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > 2013/10/28 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com > <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> > >> > >> I'm using dylan for my yocto checkout (not oe-core > standalone, since > >> this is a yocto list/question), > > > > I thought that opemenbedded-core and poky were sharing the > same core > > components, classes and functions. > > > >> > >> My build shows: > >> > >> meta > >> meta-yocto > >> meta-yocto-bsp = > "dylan:3dc4505f0e744177ae4ddff1e1ce8b31b95dfaa6" > >> meta-ti = > "master:c14c386946e1ea341faeea292580e37d538d645d" > >> meta-alphalem = > "master:a5c0e8ff51297a4090cd47d669b4fc9c94696908" > >> meta-alphalem-bsp = > "master:56086e4dc618e975c9a46491793041f0d18e47a2" > >> > >> Mike indicated that he was using dylan for meta-ti, but > that doesn't > >> make a difference either, since for our purposed. It's > kernel.bbclass > >> and the yocto kernel processing that matters. > > > > I'll build a setup with yocto (dylan), meta-beagleboard > (dylan) and > > meta-mine to check if I can reproduce the issues. > > > >> > >> In meta-alphalem-bsp, I have linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend, > with the > >> following content: > >> > >> > cat linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend > >> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.2:" > >> > >> inherit kernel > >> require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc > >> > >> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(beagleboard)" > >> > >> SRC_URI_append = " file://defconfig" > >> SRC_URI_append = " file://my_frag.cfg" > >> > >> And I added a fragment which has: > >> > >> > cat my_frag.cfg > >> CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y > >> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > >> CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y > >> > >> When both are applied to the kernel build, we should see > CONFIG_NTFS_FS > >> transition from =m to =y: > >> > >> > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS * > >> defconfig:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=m > >> my_frag.cfg:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > >> > >> After invoking linux-mainline's configure task, I see the > following: > >> > >> > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS linux-beagleboard-standard-build/.config > >> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > >> > >> And other elements of the defconfig and fragment are > properly applied > >> to the configuration phase. > >> > >> I'm also seeing good results on master, which means that > I'm at a > >> standstill to reproduce any problems. > >> > >> Diego: can you confirm for me what triggers you are seeing > that shows > >> the defconfig and fragment are not used. I assume the > config options > >> are not present, but I just want to be sure. > > > > For the full defconfig replacement after doing a > do_configure I've checked > > .config on ${S} and it did not included my CONFIGS. > > For config fragment it got stuck on do_patch task. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > *dS > > Diego Sueiro > > > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > yocto mailing list > > yocto@yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org> > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > > > I'll jump in one more time... > > Have you tried putting defconfig and patch under <machine> subdir? > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-3.2/<machine> > defconfig > my-own.patch > > I've recently added two similar entries for 3.10 and it works. > Afaik it was impossible to put a common patch under > /linux-yocto-.3.2 > at the time. > > Regards > > Andrea > > > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 27062 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-29 15:31 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-30 13:04 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-30 13:54 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-30 14:08 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-30 14:26 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-11-04 3:14 ` Bruce Ashfield 3 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-30 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Diego Sueiro, Andrea Adami; +Cc: yocto [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8847 bytes --] On 13-10-29 11:31 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: > Bruce, > > I've created new build setup with this configuration: > > BB_VERSION = "1.18.0" > BUILD_SYS = "x86_64-linux" > NATIVELSBSTRING = "Ubuntu-12.10" > TARGET_SYS = "arm-poky-linux-gnueabi" > MACHINE = "beaglebone" > DISTRO = "poky" > DISTRO_VERSION = "1.4.2" > TUNE_FEATURES = "armv7a vfp neon" > TARGET_FPU = "vfp-neon" > meta > meta-yocto > meta-yocto-bsp = "dylan:4e399f08d596197859214fdb3b06403b87bf8789" > meta-oe = "dylan:a108b2203a997634f87ac687e81712badaf3c546" > common-bsp = "dylan:7fdf9c670a10c5031a2d5555c15c45e453de8c21" > meta-mine = "dylan:4e399f08d596197859214fdb3b06403b87bf8789" > > common-bsp comes from meta-beagleboard. > meta-oe needed to be added because of machine_kernel_pr.bbclass. > > bblayers.conf: > > LCONF_VERSION = "6" > BBPATH = "${TOPDIR}" > BBFILES ?= "" > BBLAYERS ?= " \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-yocto \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-yocto-bsp \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-openembedded/meta-oe \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-beagleboard/common-bsp \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-mine \ > " > > meta-mine: > > conf/layer.conf: > > BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" > BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bb > ${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bbappend" > BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "my-layer" > BBFILE_PATTERN_my-layer := "^${LAYERDIR}/" > BBFILE_PRIORITY_my-layer = "10" > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend (scenario 1): > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" > SRC_URI += " file://defconfig \ > " > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/defconfig (scenario 1): > > http://pastebin.com/qd8B3C5K > > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend (scenario 2): > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" > inherit kernel > require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" > SRC_URI += " file://config-addons.cfg \ > " > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/config-addons.cfg > (scenario 2): > > CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y > > CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y > > > > Results: > > * Scenario 1: Full defconfig replacement > > ${WORKDIR}/defconfig comes from meta-beagleboard instead of meta-mine > > ${S}/.config comes from meta-beagleboard instead of meta-mine > I've confirmed this behaviour on dylan when I exactly reproduced your configuration. The more interesting one is scenario 2, so I'm trying it out, before looking at #1 in more detail. Bruce > * Scenario 2: Config fragments > > "bitbake linux-mainline" got stuck on do_patch > > log.do_patch: > > DEBUG: Executing shell function do_patch > > WARNING: no meta data branch found ... > > Switched to branch 'linux-3.8.y' > > [INFO] validating against known patches > (beaglebone-standard-meta) > > > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > 2013/10/29 Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com > <mailto:diego.sueiro@gmail.com>> > > 2013/10/29 Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com > <mailto:andrea.adami@gmail.com>> > > I'll jump in one more time... > > Have you tried putting defconfig and patch under <machine> subdir? > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-3.2/<machine> > defconfig > my-own.patch > > I've recently added two similar entries for 3.10 and it works. > Afaik it was impossible to put a common patch under > /linux-yocto-.3.2 > at the time. > > > Andrea, > > I did it before and not worked. > I'll do it again just to make sure. > > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > 2013/10/29 Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com > <mailto:andrea.adami@gmail.com>> > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Diego Sueiro > <diego.sueiro@gmail.com <mailto:diego.sueiro@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > 2013/10/28 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com > <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> > >> > >> I'm using dylan for my yocto checkout (not oe-core > standalone, since > >> this is a yocto list/question), > > > > I thought that opemenbedded-core and poky were sharing the > same core > > components, classes and functions. > > > >> > >> My build shows: > >> > >> meta > >> meta-yocto > >> meta-yocto-bsp = > "dylan:3dc4505f0e744177ae4ddff1e1ce8b31b95dfaa6" > >> meta-ti = > "master:c14c386946e1ea341faeea292580e37d538d645d" > >> meta-alphalem = > "master:a5c0e8ff51297a4090cd47d669b4fc9c94696908" > >> meta-alphalem-bsp = > "master:56086e4dc618e975c9a46491793041f0d18e47a2" > >> > >> Mike indicated that he was using dylan for meta-ti, but > that doesn't > >> make a difference either, since for our purposed. It's > kernel.bbclass > >> and the yocto kernel processing that matters. > > > > I'll build a setup with yocto (dylan), meta-beagleboard > (dylan) and > > meta-mine to check if I can reproduce the issues. > > > >> > >> In meta-alphalem-bsp, I have linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend, > with the > >> following content: > >> > >> > cat linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend > >> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.2:" > >> > >> inherit kernel > >> require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc > >> > >> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(beagleboard)" > >> > >> SRC_URI_append = " file://defconfig" > >> SRC_URI_append = " file://my_frag.cfg" > >> > >> And I added a fragment which has: > >> > >> > cat my_frag.cfg > >> CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y > >> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > >> CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y > >> > >> When both are applied to the kernel build, we should see > CONFIG_NTFS_FS > >> transition from =m to =y: > >> > >> > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS * > >> defconfig:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=m > >> my_frag.cfg:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > >> > >> After invoking linux-mainline's configure task, I see the > following: > >> > >> > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS linux-beagleboard-standard-build/.config > >> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > >> > >> And other elements of the defconfig and fragment are > properly applied > >> to the configuration phase. > >> > >> I'm also seeing good results on master, which means that > I'm at a > >> standstill to reproduce any problems. > >> > >> Diego: can you confirm for me what triggers you are seeing > that shows > >> the defconfig and fragment are not used. I assume the > config options > >> are not present, but I just want to be sure. > > > > For the full defconfig replacement after doing a > do_configure I've checked > > .config on ${S} and it did not included my CONFIGS. > > For config fragment it got stuck on do_patch task. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > *dS > > Diego Sueiro > > > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > yocto mailing list > > yocto@yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org> > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > > > I'll jump in one more time... > > Have you tried putting defconfig and patch under <machine> subdir? > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-3.2/<machine> > defconfig > my-own.patch > > I've recently added two similar entries for 3.10 and it works. > Afaik it was impossible to put a common patch under > /linux-yocto-.3.2 > at the time. > > Regards > > Andrea > > > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 27005 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-30 13:54 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-30 14:08 ` Diego Sueiro 0 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread From: Diego Sueiro @ 2013-10-30 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: yocto [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 609 bytes --] 2013/10/30 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> > I've confirmed this behaviour on dylan when I exactly reproduced > your configuration. The more interesting one is scenario 2, so I'm > trying it out, before looking at #1 in more detail. > Phew, now I'm not feeling crazy. Looking at linux.inc from meta-beagleboard I can see that there are a lot of tweaks applied onto kernel config. Maybe it is bricking something. https://github.com/beagleboard/meta-beagleboard/blob/dylan/common-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux.inc Regards, -- *dS Diego Sueiro /*long live rock 'n roll*/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1382 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-29 15:31 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-30 13:04 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-30 13:54 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-30 14:26 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-11-04 3:14 ` Bruce Ashfield 3 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-30 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Diego Sueiro, Andrea Adami; +Cc: yocto [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8855 bytes --] On 13-10-29 11:31 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: > Bruce, > > I've created new build setup with this configuration: > > BB_VERSION = "1.18.0" > BUILD_SYS = "x86_64-linux" > NATIVELSBSTRING = "Ubuntu-12.10" > TARGET_SYS = "arm-poky-linux-gnueabi" > MACHINE = "beaglebone" > DISTRO = "poky" > DISTRO_VERSION = "1.4.2" > TUNE_FEATURES = "armv7a vfp neon" > TARGET_FPU = "vfp-neon" > meta > meta-yocto > meta-yocto-bsp = "dylan:4e399f08d596197859214fdb3b06403b87bf8789" > meta-oe = "dylan:a108b2203a997634f87ac687e81712badaf3c546" > common-bsp = "dylan:7fdf9c670a10c5031a2d5555c15c45e453de8c21" > meta-mine = "dylan:4e399f08d596197859214fdb3b06403b87bf8789" > > common-bsp comes from meta-beagleboard. > meta-oe needed to be added because of machine_kernel_pr.bbclass. > > bblayers.conf: > > LCONF_VERSION = "6" > BBPATH = "${TOPDIR}" > BBFILES ?= "" > BBLAYERS ?= " \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-yocto \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-yocto-bsp \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-openembedded/meta-oe \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-beagleboard/common-bsp \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-mine \ > " > > meta-mine: > > conf/layer.conf: > > BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" > BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bb > ${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bbappend" > BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "my-layer" > BBFILE_PATTERN_my-layer := "^${LAYERDIR}/" > BBFILE_PRIORITY_my-layer = "10" > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend (scenario 1): > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" > SRC_URI += " file://defconfig \ > " > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/defconfig (scenario 1): > > http://pastebin.com/qd8B3C5K > > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend (scenario 2): > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" > inherit kernel > require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" > SRC_URI += " file://config-addons.cfg \ > " > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/config-addons.cfg > (scenario 2): > > CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y > > CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y > > > > Results: > > * Scenario 1: Full defconfig replacement > > ${WORKDIR}/defconfig comes from meta-beagleboard instead of meta-mine > > ${S}/.config comes from meta-beagleboard instead of meta-mine > > * Scenario 2: Config fragments > > "bitbake linux-mainline" got stuck on do_patch > > log.do_patch: > > DEBUG: Executing shell function do_patch > > WARNING: no meta data branch found ... > > Switched to branch 'linux-3.8.y' > > [INFO] validating against known patches > (beaglebone-standard-meta) > .... AND, I can see this now as well. So you are definitely seeing a bug, give me a few hours and I'll spin a fix, or find out what is configured wrong and catch it before it causes problems. Bruce > > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > 2013/10/29 Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com > <mailto:diego.sueiro@gmail.com>> > > 2013/10/29 Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com > <mailto:andrea.adami@gmail.com>> > > I'll jump in one more time... > > Have you tried putting defconfig and patch under <machine> subdir? > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-3.2/<machine> > defconfig > my-own.patch > > I've recently added two similar entries for 3.10 and it works. > Afaik it was impossible to put a common patch under > /linux-yocto-.3.2 > at the time. > > > Andrea, > > I did it before and not worked. > I'll do it again just to make sure. > > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > 2013/10/29 Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com > <mailto:andrea.adami@gmail.com>> > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Diego Sueiro > <diego.sueiro@gmail.com <mailto:diego.sueiro@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > 2013/10/28 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com > <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> > >> > >> I'm using dylan for my yocto checkout (not oe-core > standalone, since > >> this is a yocto list/question), > > > > I thought that opemenbedded-core and poky were sharing the > same core > > components, classes and functions. > > > >> > >> My build shows: > >> > >> meta > >> meta-yocto > >> meta-yocto-bsp = > "dylan:3dc4505f0e744177ae4ddff1e1ce8b31b95dfaa6" > >> meta-ti = > "master:c14c386946e1ea341faeea292580e37d538d645d" > >> meta-alphalem = > "master:a5c0e8ff51297a4090cd47d669b4fc9c94696908" > >> meta-alphalem-bsp = > "master:56086e4dc618e975c9a46491793041f0d18e47a2" > >> > >> Mike indicated that he was using dylan for meta-ti, but > that doesn't > >> make a difference either, since for our purposed. It's > kernel.bbclass > >> and the yocto kernel processing that matters. > > > > I'll build a setup with yocto (dylan), meta-beagleboard > (dylan) and > > meta-mine to check if I can reproduce the issues. > > > >> > >> In meta-alphalem-bsp, I have linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend, > with the > >> following content: > >> > >> > cat linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend > >> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.2:" > >> > >> inherit kernel > >> require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc > >> > >> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(beagleboard)" > >> > >> SRC_URI_append = " file://defconfig" > >> SRC_URI_append = " file://my_frag.cfg" > >> > >> And I added a fragment which has: > >> > >> > cat my_frag.cfg > >> CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y > >> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > >> CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y > >> > >> When both are applied to the kernel build, we should see > CONFIG_NTFS_FS > >> transition from =m to =y: > >> > >> > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS * > >> defconfig:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=m > >> my_frag.cfg:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > >> > >> After invoking linux-mainline's configure task, I see the > following: > >> > >> > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS linux-beagleboard-standard-build/.config > >> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > >> > >> And other elements of the defconfig and fragment are > properly applied > >> to the configuration phase. > >> > >> I'm also seeing good results on master, which means that > I'm at a > >> standstill to reproduce any problems. > >> > >> Diego: can you confirm for me what triggers you are seeing > that shows > >> the defconfig and fragment are not used. I assume the > config options > >> are not present, but I just want to be sure. > > > > For the full defconfig replacement after doing a > do_configure I've checked > > .config on ${S} and it did not included my CONFIGS. > > For config fragment it got stuck on do_patch task. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > *dS > > Diego Sueiro > > > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > yocto mailing list > > yocto@yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org> > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > > > I'll jump in one more time... > > Have you tried putting defconfig and patch under <machine> subdir? > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-3.2/<machine> > defconfig > my-own.patch > > I've recently added two similar entries for 3.10 and it works. > Afaik it was impossible to put a common patch under > /linux-yocto-.3.2 > at the time. > > Regards > > Andrea > > > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 27023 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-29 15:31 ` Diego Sueiro ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2013-10-30 14:26 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-11-04 3:14 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-11-28 15:37 ` Diego Sueiro 3 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-11-04 3:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Diego Sueiro, Andrea Adami; +Cc: yocto, Paul Eggleton [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 11087 bytes --] On 13-10-29 11:31 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: > Bruce, > > I've created new build setup with this configuration: > > BB_VERSION = "1.18.0" > BUILD_SYS = "x86_64-linux" > NATIVELSBSTRING = "Ubuntu-12.10" > TARGET_SYS = "arm-poky-linux-gnueabi" > MACHINE = "beaglebone" > DISTRO = "poky" > DISTRO_VERSION = "1.4.2" > TUNE_FEATURES = "armv7a vfp neon" > TARGET_FPU = "vfp-neon" > meta > meta-yocto > meta-yocto-bsp = "dylan:4e399f08d596197859214fdb3b06403b87bf8789" > meta-oe = "dylan:a108b2203a997634f87ac687e81712badaf3c546" > common-bsp = "dylan:7fdf9c670a10c5031a2d5555c15c45e453de8c21" > meta-mine = "dylan:4e399f08d596197859214fdb3b06403b87bf8789" > > common-bsp comes from meta-beagleboard. > meta-oe needed to be added because of machine_kernel_pr.bbclass. > > bblayers.conf: > > LCONF_VERSION = "6" > BBPATH = "${TOPDIR}" > BBFILES ?= "" > BBLAYERS ?= " \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-yocto \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-yocto-bsp \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-openembedded/meta-oe \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-beagleboard/common-bsp \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-mine \ > " > > meta-mine: > > conf/layer.conf: > > BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" > BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bb > ${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bbappend" > BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "my-layer" > BBFILE_PATTERN_my-layer := "^${LAYERDIR}/" > BBFILE_PRIORITY_my-layer = "10" > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend (scenario 1): > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" > SRC_URI += " file://defconfig \ > " > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/defconfig (scenario 1): > > http://pastebin.com/qd8B3C5K > > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend (scenario 2): > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" > inherit kernel > require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" > SRC_URI += " file://config-addons.cfg \ > " > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/config-addons.cfg (scenario 2): > > CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y > > CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y > > > > Results: > > * Scenario 1: Full defconfig replacement > > ${WORKDIR}/defconfig comes from meta-beagleboard instead of meta-mine > > ${S}/.config comes from meta-beagleboard instead of meta-mine FYI: I went silent on this, since I was running a few experiments in the background. Mainly on scenario 2, but I can say that I see the same behaviour with scenario #1 as you do. Whether or not I use the yocto kernel tooling, or the core kernel processing, I see exactly the same defconfig used. The issue you are seeing is distinct from the kernel processing, since the defconfig isn't treated any differently than anything else on the SRC_URI from the fetcher point of view ... and it is the fetcher which is matching file://defconfig from the meta-beagleboard layer before the one you have in meta-mine, since FILESEXTRAPATHS are searched after the FILESPATH for the elements in the SRC_URI. But I'm not a fetcher expert, that's my understanding and empirical evidence. As a debug, I called src_patches() in patches.bbclass explicitly, and it is obvious that the source of the defconfig is from meta-beagleboard. Renaming the file in meta-beagleboard, allows the one in meta-mine to be found, since the search continues. So for this question, your issue is with the ordering of the elements on the SRC_URI, and you can have your layer prioritized by making sure it is in the search paths first. This may or may not contradict the docs, and there are several threads ongoing about SRC_URI ordering in the various branches .. so I'm simply watching and waiting on this one. > > * Scenario 2: Config fragments > > "bitbake linux-mainline" got stuck on do_patch > > log.do_patch: > > DEBUG: Executing shell function do_patch > > WARNING: no meta data branch found ... > > Switched to branch 'linux-3.8.y' > > [INFO] validating against known patches (beaglebone-standard-meta) > As for this. I debugged it over the weekend, and you wouldn't see this on master, but the tools on the dylan branch aren't using the proper kern-tools SRCREVS. As such, I backported a change from master, and switched the kern-tools to use the dylan branch. What you were seeing as a hang, was really just an extremely long run of the patch processing, the 700+ patches in the beagleboard kernel recipe were being detected multiple times, and expanding to 47K entries. Which the patch I've attached here, I was able to patch and configure the kernel with the same layers. Note: the run still takes a long time, since even applying 700 patches at a couple of seconds per patch .. takes a good chunk of time. I've added Paul Eggleton to the cc: list, since I'm not sure if dylan is still being updated, but if it is, the patch I'm attaching should be applied to fix the kern-tools situation in that branch. Cheers, Bruce > > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > 2013/10/29 Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com > <mailto:diego.sueiro@gmail.com>> > > 2013/10/29 Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com > <mailto:andrea.adami@gmail.com>> > > I'll jump in one more time... > > Have you tried putting defconfig and patch under <machine> subdir? > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-3.2/<machine> > defconfig > my-own.patch > > I've recently added two similar entries for 3.10 and it works. > Afaik it was impossible to put a common patch under > /linux-yocto-.3.2 > at the time. > > > Andrea, > > I did it before and not worked. > I'll do it again just to make sure. > > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > 2013/10/29 Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com > <mailto:andrea.adami@gmail.com>> > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Diego Sueiro > <diego.sueiro@gmail.com <mailto:diego.sueiro@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > 2013/10/28 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com > <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> > >> > >> I'm using dylan for my yocto checkout (not oe-core > standalone, since > >> this is a yocto list/question), > > > > I thought that opemenbedded-core and poky were sharing the > same core > > components, classes and functions. > > > >> > >> My build shows: > >> > >> meta > >> meta-yocto > >> meta-yocto-bsp = > "dylan:3dc4505f0e744177ae4ddff1e1ce8b31b95dfaa6" > >> meta-ti = > "master:c14c386946e1ea341faeea292580e37d538d645d" > >> meta-alphalem = > "master:a5c0e8ff51297a4090cd47d669b4fc9c94696908" > >> meta-alphalem-bsp = > "master:56086e4dc618e975c9a46491793041f0d18e47a2" > >> > >> Mike indicated that he was using dylan for meta-ti, but that > doesn't > >> make a difference either, since for our purposed. It's > kernel.bbclass > >> and the yocto kernel processing that matters. > > > > I'll build a setup with yocto (dylan), meta-beagleboard > (dylan) and > > meta-mine to check if I can reproduce the issues. > > > >> > >> In meta-alphalem-bsp, I have linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend, > with the > >> following content: > >> > >> > cat linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend > >> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.2:" > >> > >> inherit kernel > >> require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc > >> > >> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(beagleboard)" > >> > >> SRC_URI_append = " file://defconfig" > >> SRC_URI_append = " file://my_frag.cfg" > >> > >> And I added a fragment which has: > >> > >> > cat my_frag.cfg > >> CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y > >> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > >> CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y > >> > >> When both are applied to the kernel build, we should see > CONFIG_NTFS_FS > >> transition from =m to =y: > >> > >> > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS * > >> defconfig:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=m > >> my_frag.cfg:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > >> > >> After invoking linux-mainline's configure task, I see the > following: > >> > >> > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS linux-beagleboard-standard-build/.config > >> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > >> > >> And other elements of the defconfig and fragment are > properly applied > >> to the configuration phase. > >> > >> I'm also seeing good results on master, which means that I'm > at a > >> standstill to reproduce any problems. > >> > >> Diego: can you confirm for me what triggers you are seeing > that shows > >> the defconfig and fragment are not used. I assume the config > options > >> are not present, but I just want to be sure. > > > > For the full defconfig replacement after doing a do_configure > I've checked > > .config on ${S} and it did not included my CONFIGS. > > For config fragment it got stuck on do_patch task. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > *dS > > Diego Sueiro > > > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > yocto mailing list > > yocto@yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org> > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > > > I'll jump in one more time... > > Have you tried putting defconfig and patch under <machine> subdir? > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-3.2/<machine> > defconfig > my-own.patch > > I've recently added two similar entries for 3.10 and it works. > Afaik it was impossible to put a common patch under > /linux-yocto-.3.2 > at the time. > > Regards > > Andrea > > > [-- Attachment #2: 0001-kern-tools-use-dylan-branch.patch --] [-- Type: application/mbox, Size: 1424 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-11-04 3:14 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-11-28 15:37 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-11-28 15:49 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Diego Sueiro @ 2013-11-28 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: yocto, Paul Eggleton [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 11699 bytes --] Bruce, Any updates on this? Regards, -- *dS Diego Sueiro /*long live rock 'n roll*/ On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com > wrote: > On 13-10-29 11:31 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: > >> Bruce, >> >> I've created new build setup with this configuration: >> >> BB_VERSION = "1.18.0" >> BUILD_SYS = "x86_64-linux" >> NATIVELSBSTRING = "Ubuntu-12.10" >> TARGET_SYS = "arm-poky-linux-gnueabi" >> MACHINE = "beaglebone" >> DISTRO = "poky" >> DISTRO_VERSION = "1.4.2" >> TUNE_FEATURES = "armv7a vfp neon" >> TARGET_FPU = "vfp-neon" >> meta >> meta-yocto >> meta-yocto-bsp = "dylan:4e399f08d596197859214fdb3b06403b87bf8789" >> meta-oe = "dylan:a108b2203a997634f87ac687e81712badaf3c546" >> common-bsp = "dylan:7fdf9c670a10c5031a2d5555c15c45e453de8c21" >> meta-mine = "dylan:4e399f08d596197859214fdb3b06403b87bf8789" >> >> common-bsp comes from meta-beagleboard. >> meta-oe needed to be added because of machine_kernel_pr.bbclass. >> >> bblayers.conf: >> >> LCONF_VERSION = "6" >> BBPATH = "${TOPDIR}" >> BBFILES ?= "" >> BBLAYERS ?= " \ >> ${TOPDIR}/meta \ >> ${TOPDIR}/meta-yocto \ >> ${TOPDIR}/meta-yocto-bsp \ >> ${TOPDIR}/meta-openembedded/meta-oe \ >> ${TOPDIR}/meta-beagleboard/common-bsp \ >> ${TOPDIR}/meta-mine \ >> " >> >> meta-mine: >> >> conf/layer.conf: >> >> BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" >> BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bb >> ${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bbappend" >> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "my-layer" >> BBFILE_PATTERN_my-layer := "^${LAYERDIR}/" >> BBFILE_PRIORITY_my-layer = "10" >> >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend (scenario 1): >> >> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" >> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" >> SRC_URI += " file://defconfig \ >> " >> >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/defconfig (scenario 1): >> >> http://pastebin.com/qd8B3C5K >> >> >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend (scenario 2): >> >> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" >> inherit kernel >> require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc >> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" >> SRC_URI += " file://config-addons.cfg \ >> " >> >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline-3.8/config-addons.cfg (scenario >> 2): >> >> CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y >> >> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y >> CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y >> >> >> >> Results: >> >> * Scenario 1: Full defconfig replacement >> >> >> ${WORKDIR}/defconfig comes from meta-beagleboard instead of meta-mine >> >> ${S}/.config comes from meta-beagleboard instead of meta-mine >> > > FYI: I went silent on this, since I was running a few experiments in the > background. Mainly on scenario 2, but I can say that I see the same > behaviour > with scenario #1 as you do. Whether or not I use the yocto kernel tooling, > or the core kernel processing, I see exactly the same defconfig used. > > The issue you are seeing is distinct from the kernel processing, since > the defconfig isn't treated any differently than anything else on the > SRC_URI from the fetcher point of view ... and it is the fetcher which > is matching file://defconfig from the meta-beagleboard layer before the > one you have in meta-mine, since FILESEXTRAPATHS are searched after the > FILESPATH for the elements in the SRC_URI. But I'm not a fetcher expert, > that's my understanding and empirical evidence. > > As a debug, I called src_patches() in patches.bbclass explicitly, and > it is obvious that the source of the defconfig is from meta-beagleboard. > Renaming the file in meta-beagleboard, allows the one in meta-mine to > be found, since the search continues. > > So for this question, your issue is with the ordering of the elements > on the SRC_URI, and you can have your layer prioritized by making sure > it is in the search paths first. > > This may or may not contradict the docs, and there are several threads > ongoing about SRC_URI ordering in the various branches .. so I'm simply > watching and waiting on this one. > > >> * Scenario 2: Config fragments >> >> >> "bitbake linux-mainline" got stuck on do_patch >> >> log.do_patch: >> >> DEBUG: Executing shell function do_patch >> >> WARNING: no meta data branch found ... >> >> Switched to branch 'linux-3.8.y' >> >> [INFO] validating against known patches >> (beaglebone-standard-meta) >> >> > As for this. I debugged it over the weekend, and you wouldn't see this on > master, but the tools on the dylan branch aren't using the proper > kern-tools > SRCREVS. As such, I backported a change from master, and switched the > kern-tools to use the dylan branch. > > What you were seeing as a hang, was really just an extremely long run > of the patch processing, the 700+ patches in the beagleboard kernel > recipe were being detected multiple times, and expanding to 47K entries. > > Which the patch I've attached here, I was able to patch and configure the > kernel with the same layers. Note: the run still takes a long time, since > even applying 700 patches at a couple of seconds per patch .. takes a > good chunk of time. > > I've added Paul Eggleton to the cc: list, since I'm not sure if dylan is > still being updated, but if it is, the patch I'm attaching should be > applied to fix the kern-tools situation in that branch. > > Cheers, > > Bruce > > >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> *dS >> Diego Sueiro >> >> /*long live rock 'n roll*/ >> >> >> 2013/10/29 Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com >> <mailto:diego.sueiro@gmail.com>> >> >> 2013/10/29 Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com >> <mailto:andrea.adami@gmail.com>> >> >> >> I'll jump in one more time... >> >> Have you tried putting defconfig and patch under <machine> subdir? >> >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-3.2/<machine> >> defconfig >> my-own.patch >> >> I've recently added two similar entries for 3.10 and it works. >> Afaik it was impossible to put a common patch under >> /linux-yocto-.3.2 >> at the time. >> >> >> Andrea, >> >> I did it before and not worked. >> I'll do it again just to make sure. >> >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> *dS >> Diego Sueiro >> >> /*long live rock 'n roll*/ >> >> >> 2013/10/29 Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com >> <mailto:andrea.adami@gmail.com>> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Diego Sueiro >> <diego.sueiro@gmail.com <mailto:diego.sueiro@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > >> > 2013/10/28 Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com >> <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> >> >> >> >> >> I'm using dylan for my yocto checkout (not oe-core >> standalone, since >> >> this is a yocto list/question), >> > >> > I thought that opemenbedded-core and poky were sharing the >> same core >> > components, classes and functions. >> > >> >> >> >> My build shows: >> >> >> >> meta >> >> meta-yocto >> >> meta-yocto-bsp = >> "dylan:3dc4505f0e744177ae4ddff1e1ce8b31b95dfaa6" >> >> meta-ti = >> "master:c14c386946e1ea341faeea292580e37d538d645d" >> >> meta-alphalem = >> "master:a5c0e8ff51297a4090cd47d669b4fc9c94696908" >> >> meta-alphalem-bsp = >> "master:56086e4dc618e975c9a46491793041f0d18e47a2" >> >> >> >> Mike indicated that he was using dylan for meta-ti, but that >> doesn't >> >> make a difference either, since for our purposed. It's >> kernel.bbclass >> >> and the yocto kernel processing that matters. >> > >> > I'll build a setup with yocto (dylan), meta-beagleboard >> (dylan) and >> > meta-mine to check if I can reproduce the issues. >> > >> >> >> >> In meta-alphalem-bsp, I have linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend, >> with the >> >> following content: >> >> >> >> > cat linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend >> >> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.2:" >> >> >> >> inherit kernel >> >> require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc >> >> >> >> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(beagleboard)" >> >> >> >> SRC_URI_append = " file://defconfig" >> >> SRC_URI_append = " file://my_frag.cfg" >> >> >> >> And I added a fragment which has: >> >> >> >> > cat my_frag.cfg >> >> CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y >> >> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y >> >> CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y >> >> >> >> When both are applied to the kernel build, we should see >> CONFIG_NTFS_FS >> >> transition from =m to =y: >> >> >> >> > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS * >> >> defconfig:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=m >> >> my_frag.cfg:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y >> >> >> >> After invoking linux-mainline's configure task, I see the >> following: >> >> >> >> > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS linux-beagleboard-standard- >> build/.config >> >> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y >> >> >> >> And other elements of the defconfig and fragment are >> properly applied >> >> to the configuration phase. >> >> >> >> I'm also seeing good results on master, which means that I'm >> at a >> >> standstill to reproduce any problems. >> >> >> >> Diego: can you confirm for me what triggers you are seeing >> that shows >> >> the defconfig and fragment are not used. I assume the config >> options >> >> are not present, but I just want to be sure. >> > >> > For the full defconfig replacement after doing a do_configure >> I've checked >> > .config on ${S} and it did not included my CONFIGS. >> > For config fragment it got stuck on do_patch task. >> > >> > >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > -- >> > *dS >> > Diego Sueiro >> > >> > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > yocto mailing list >> > yocto@yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org> >> >> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >> > >> >> I'll jump in one more time... >> >> Have you tried putting defconfig and patch under <machine> subdir? >> >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-3.2/<machine> >> defconfig >> my-own.patch >> >> I've recently added two similar entries for 3.10 and it works. >> Afaik it was impossible to put a common patch under >> /linux-yocto-.3.2 >> at the time. >> >> Regards >> >> Andrea >> >> >> >> > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 15365 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-11-28 15:37 ` Diego Sueiro @ 2013-11-28 15:49 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-11-28 16:26 ` Diego Sueiro 0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-11-28 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Diego Sueiro; +Cc: yocto, Paul Eggleton On 11/28/2013, 10:37 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: > Bruce, > > Any updates on this? Which part ? :) The defconfig "selection" (prioritization) was explained by instrumenting the SRC_URI processing order, and it was behaving as expected. And the patch I attached for the kern-tools to use the dedicated release branch for dylan fixed the other patching issue you were seeing. Cheers, Bruce > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Bruce Ashfield > <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> wrote: > > On 13-10-29 11 <tel:13-10-29%2011>:31 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: > > Bruce, > > I've created new build setup with this configuration: > > BB_VERSION = "1.18.0" > BUILD_SYS = "x86_64-linux" > NATIVELSBSTRING = "Ubuntu-12.10" > TARGET_SYS = "arm-poky-linux-gnueabi" > MACHINE = "beaglebone" > DISTRO = "poky" > DISTRO_VERSION = "1.4.2" > TUNE_FEATURES = "armv7a vfp neon" > TARGET_FPU = "vfp-neon" > meta > meta-yocto > meta-yocto-bsp = > "dylan:__4e399f08d596197859214fdb3b0640__3b87bf8789" > meta-oe = > "dylan:__a108b2203a997634f87ac687e81712__badaf3c546" > common-bsp = > "dylan:__7fdf9c670a10c5031a2d5555c15c45__e453de8c21" > meta-mine = > "dylan:__4e399f08d596197859214fdb3b0640__3b87bf8789" > > common-bsp comes from meta-beagleboard. > meta-oe needed to be added because of machine_kernel_pr.bbclass. > > bblayers.conf: > > LCONF_VERSION = "6" > BBPATH = "${TOPDIR}" > BBFILES ?= "" > BBLAYERS ?= " \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-yocto \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-yocto-bsp \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-openembedded/__meta-oe \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-beagleboard/__common-bsp \ > ${TOPDIR}/meta-mine \ > " > > meta-mine: > > conf/layer.conf: > > BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" > BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.bb > ${LAYERDIR}/recipes*/*/*.__bbappend" > BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "my-layer" > BBFILE_PATTERN_my-layer := "^${LAYERDIR}/" > BBFILE_PRIORITY_my-layer = "10" > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__mainline_3.8.bbappend > (scenario 1): > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" > SRC_URI += " file://defconfig \ > " > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__mainline-3.8/defconfig > (scenario 1): > > http://pastebin.com/qd8B3C5K > > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__mainline_3.8.bbappend > (scenario 2): > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.8:" > inherit kernel > require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__yocto.inc > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_beaglebone = "(beaglebone)" > SRC_URI += " file://config-addons.cfg \ > " > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__mainline-3.8/config-addons.cfg > (scenario 2): > > CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y > > CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y > > > > Results: > > * Scenario 1: Full defconfig replacement > > > ${WORKDIR}/defconfig comes from meta-beagleboard instead of > meta-mine > > ${S}/.config comes from meta-beagleboard instead of meta-mine > > > FYI: I went silent on this, since I was running a few experiments in the > background. Mainly on scenario 2, but I can say that I see the same > behaviour > with scenario #1 as you do. Whether or not I use the yocto kernel > tooling, > or the core kernel processing, I see exactly the same defconfig used. > > The issue you are seeing is distinct from the kernel processing, since > the defconfig isn't treated any differently than anything else on the > SRC_URI from the fetcher point of view ... and it is the fetcher which > is matching file://defconfig from the meta-beagleboard layer before the > one you have in meta-mine, since FILESEXTRAPATHS are searched after the > FILESPATH for the elements in the SRC_URI. But I'm not a fetcher expert, > that's my understanding and empirical evidence. > > As a debug, I called src_patches() in patches.bbclass explicitly, and > it is obvious that the source of the defconfig is from meta-beagleboard. > Renaming the file in meta-beagleboard, allows the one in meta-mine to > be found, since the search continues. > > So for this question, your issue is with the ordering of the elements > on the SRC_URI, and you can have your layer prioritized by making sure > it is in the search paths first. > > This may or may not contradict the docs, and there are several threads > ongoing about SRC_URI ordering in the various branches .. so I'm simply > watching and waiting on this one. > > > * Scenario 2: Config fragments > > > "bitbake linux-mainline" got stuck on do_patch > > log.do_patch: > > DEBUG: Executing shell function do_patch > > WARNING: no meta data branch found ... > > Switched to branch 'linux-3.8.y' > > [INFO] validating against known patches > (beaglebone-standard-meta) > > > As for this. I debugged it over the weekend, and you wouldn't see > this on > master, but the tools on the dylan branch aren't using the proper > kern-tools > SRCREVS. As such, I backported a change from master, and switched the > kern-tools to use the dylan branch. > > What you were seeing as a hang, was really just an extremely long run > of the patch processing, the 700+ patches in the beagleboard kernel > recipe were being detected multiple times, and expanding to 47K entries. > > Which the patch I've attached here, I was able to patch and > configure the > kernel with the same layers. Note: the run still takes a long time, > since > even applying 700 patches at a couple of seconds per patch .. takes a > good chunk of time. > > I've added Paul Eggleton to the cc: list, since I'm not sure if dylan is > still being updated, but if it is, the patch I'm attaching should be > applied to fix the kern-tools situation in that branch. > > Cheers, > > Bruce > > > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > 2013/10/29 Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com > <mailto:diego.sueiro@gmail.com> > <mailto:diego.sueiro@gmail.com <mailto:diego.sueiro@gmail.com>__>> > > 2013/10/29 Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com > <mailto:andrea.adami@gmail.com> > <mailto:andrea.adami@gmail.com > <mailto:andrea.adami@gmail.com>__>> > > > I'll jump in one more time... > > Have you tried putting defconfig and patch under > <machine> subdir? > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__yocto-3.2/<machine> > defconfig > my-own.patch > > I've recently added two similar entries for 3.10 and it > works. > Afaik it was impossible to put a common patch under > /linux-yocto-.3.2 > at the time. > > > Andrea, > > I did it before and not worked. > I'll do it again just to make sure. > > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > 2013/10/29 Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com > <mailto:andrea.adami@gmail.com> > <mailto:andrea.adami@gmail.com > <mailto:andrea.adami@gmail.com>__>> > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Diego Sueiro > <diego.sueiro@gmail.com <mailto:diego.sueiro@gmail.com> > <mailto:diego.sueiro@gmail.com > <mailto:diego.sueiro@gmail.com>__>> wrote: > > > > 2013/10/28 Bruce Ashfield > <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> > <mailto:bruce.ashfield@__windriver.com > <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>>> > > >> > >> I'm using dylan for my yocto checkout (not oe-core > standalone, since > >> this is a yocto list/question), > > > > I thought that opemenbedded-core and poky were > sharing the > same core > > components, classes and functions. > > > >> > >> My build shows: > >> > >> meta > >> meta-yocto > >> meta-yocto-bsp = > "dylan:__3dc4505f0e744177ae4ddff1e1ce8b__31b95dfaa6" > >> meta-ti = > "master:__c14c386946e1ea341faeea292580e3__7d538d645d" > >> meta-alphalem = > "master:__a5c0e8ff51297a4090cd47d669b4fc__9c94696908" > >> meta-alphalem-bsp = > "master:__56086e4dc618e975c9a46491793041__f0d18e47a2" > >> > >> Mike indicated that he was using dylan for meta-ti, > but that > doesn't > >> make a difference either, since for our purposed. It's > kernel.bbclass > >> and the yocto kernel processing that matters. > > > > I'll build a setup with yocto (dylan), meta-beagleboard > (dylan) and > > meta-mine to check if I can reproduce the issues. > > > >> > >> In meta-alphalem-bsp, I have > linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend, > with the > >> following content: > >> > >> > cat linux-mainline_3.2.bbappend > >> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-3.2:" > >> > >> inherit kernel > >> require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__yocto.inc > >> > >> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(beagleboard)" > >> > >> SRC_URI_append = " file://defconfig" > >> SRC_URI_append = " file://my_frag.cfg" > >> > >> And I added a fragment which has: > >> > >> > cat my_frag.cfg > >> CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT=y > >> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > >> CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y > >> > >> When both are applied to the kernel build, we > should see > CONFIG_NTFS_FS > >> transition from =m to =y: > >> > >> > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS * > >> defconfig:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=m > >> my_frag.cfg:CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > >> > >> After invoking linux-mainline's configure task, I > see the > following: > >> > >> > grep CONFIG_NTFS_FS > linux-beagleboard-standard-__build/.config > >> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y > >> > >> And other elements of the defconfig and fragment are > properly applied > >> to the configuration phase. > >> > >> I'm also seeing good results on master, which means > that I'm > at a > >> standstill to reproduce any problems. > >> > >> Diego: can you confirm for me what triggers you are > seeing > that shows > >> the defconfig and fragment are not used. I assume > the config > options > >> are not present, but I just want to be sure. > > > > For the full defconfig replacement after doing a > do_configure > I've checked > > .config on ${S} and it did not included my CONFIGS. > > For config fragment it got stuck on do_patch task. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > *dS > > Diego Sueiro > > > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ > > > > _________________________________________________ > > yocto mailing list > > yocto@yoctoproject.org > <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org> <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org > <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org>__> > > > https://lists.yoctoproject.__org/listinfo/yocto > <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto> > > > > I'll jump in one more time... > > Have you tried putting defconfig and patch under > <machine> subdir? > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__yocto-3.2/<machine> > defconfig > my-own.patch > > I've recently added two similar entries for 3.10 and it > works. > Afaik it was impossible to put a common patch under > /linux-yocto-.3.2 > at the time. > > Regards > > Andrea > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-11-28 15:49 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-11-28 16:26 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-11-28 16:28 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Diego Sueiro @ 2013-11-28 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: yocto, Paul Eggleton [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 348 bytes --] On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Bruce Ashfield < bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> wrote: > And the patch I attached for the kern-tools to use the dedicated > release branch for dylan fixed the other patching issue you were > seeing. > This patch was applied in some repo? Regards, -- *dS Diego Sueiro /*long live rock 'n roll*/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 787 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-11-28 16:26 ` Diego Sueiro @ 2013-11-28 16:28 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-11-28 16:41 ` Paul Eggleton 0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-11-28 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Diego Sueiro; +Cc: yocto, Paul Eggleton On 11/28/2013, 11:26 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Bruce Ashfield > <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> wrote: > > And the patch I attached for the kern-tools to use the dedicated > release branch for dylan fixed the other patching issue you were > seeing. > > > This patch was applied in some repo? That's why I cc'd Paul on the submission, but I suspect it got lost, since I never did get a comment .. and we are all pretty busily juggling multiple things at once. Paul: can you find the patch in the history of this thread ? If not I can resend it directly. Bruce > > Regards, > > -- > *dS > Diego Sueiro > > /*long live rock 'n roll*/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-11-28 16:28 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-11-28 16:41 ` Paul Eggleton 2013-11-28 17:26 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Paul Eggleton @ 2013-11-28 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield, Diego Sueiro; +Cc: yocto Hi Bruce / Diego, On Thursday 28 November 2013 11:28:41 Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 11/28/2013, 11:26 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Bruce Ashfield > > > > <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> wrote: > > And the patch I attached for the kern-tools to use the dedicated > > release branch for dylan fixed the other patching issue you were > > seeing. > > > > This patch was applied in some repo? > > That's why I cc'd Paul on the submission, but I suspect it got lost, since > I never did get a comment .. and we are all pretty busily juggling multiple > things at once. > > Paul: can you find the patch in the history of this thread ? If not I > can resend it directly. I've still got it in my queue. I'll try to process and send that out tomorrow, sorry for the delay. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-11-28 16:41 ` Paul Eggleton @ 2013-11-28 17:26 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-11-28 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Eggleton, Diego Sueiro; +Cc: yocto On 11/28/2013, 11:41 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Hi Bruce / Diego, > > On Thursday 28 November 2013 11:28:41 Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> On 11/28/2013, 11:26 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Bruce Ashfield >>> >>> <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> wrote: >>> And the patch I attached for the kern-tools to use the dedicated >>> release branch for dylan fixed the other patching issue you were >>> seeing. >>> >>> This patch was applied in some repo? >> >> That's why I cc'd Paul on the submission, but I suspect it got lost, since >> I never did get a comment .. and we are all pretty busily juggling multiple >> things at once. >> >> Paul: can you find the patch in the history of this thread ? If not I >> can resend it directly. > > I've still got it in my queue. I'll try to process and send that out tomorrow, > sorry for the delay. No worries. I of all people understand a merge backlog (as I look at my pending BSP merge list :) Bruce > > Cheers, > Paul > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-15 21:07 Custom defconfig is not used Diego Sueiro 2013-10-15 21:29 ` Katu Txakur 2013-10-15 21:49 ` Rudolf Streif @ 2013-10-30 7:57 ` Jukka Rissanen 2013-10-30 12:27 ` Bruce Ashfield 2 siblings, 1 reply; 43+ messages in thread From: Jukka Rissanen @ 2013-10-30 7:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Diego Sueiro; +Cc: yocto Hi Diego, On 16.10.2013 00:07, Diego Sueiro wrote: > Folks, > > I created the following bbapend recipe for linux-mainline_3.8.bb > <http://linux-mainline_3.8.bb> (from meta-beagleboard on dylan branch) > for beaglebone. > meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend: > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:" > SRC_URI += " file://0019-mine.patch \ > file://defconfig \ > " > > But the defconfig and .config files on ${S} and ${WORKDIR} used are from > meta-beagleboad, not from my bbappend. I did this like this in http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-eca/tree/meta-eca-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend FILESEXTRAPATHS_append := ":${THISDIR}/${PN}" # netfilter stuff is missing from beaglebone kernel SRC_URI_append_beaglebone += "file://netfilter.cfg" do_configure_append_beaglebone () { for i in ${S}/../*.cfg; do echo "Adding ${i} to ${S}/.config" cat ${i} >> ${S}/.config done yes '' | oe_runmake oldconfig } Seems to work just fine for me. -- Cheers, Jukka ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
* Re: Custom defconfig is not used 2013-10-30 7:57 ` Jukka Rissanen @ 2013-10-30 12:27 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 0 replies; 43+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2013-10-30 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jukka Rissanen; +Cc: yocto On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Jukka Rissanen <jukka.rissanen@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Hi Diego, > > > On 16.10.2013 00:07, Diego Sueiro wrote: >> >> Folks, >> >> I created the following bbapend recipe for linux-mainline_3.8.bb >> <http://linux-mainline_3.8.bb> (from meta-beagleboard on dylan branch) >> >> for beaglebone. >> meta-mine/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend: >> >> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:" >> SRC_URI += " file://0019-mine.patch \ >> file://defconfig \ >> " >> >> But the defconfig and .config files on ${S} and ${WORKDIR} used are from >> meta-beagleboad, not from my bbappend. > > > I did this like this in > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-eca/tree/meta-eca-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-mainline_3.8.bbappend > > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_append := ":${THISDIR}/${PN}" > > # netfilter stuff is missing from beaglebone kernel > SRC_URI_append_beaglebone += "file://netfilter.cfg" > > do_configure_append_beaglebone () { > for i in ${S}/../*.cfg; do > echo "Adding ${i} to ${S}/.config" > cat ${i} >> ${S}/.config > done > > yes '' | oe_runmake oldconfig > } > > > Seems to work just fine for me. > But that's *really* not the point. Having configuration fragments applied and managed is more than a brute force concatenation of the contents, letting lkc do what it wants to them, without reporting and control is what There's something in place, that already does this and more, which has the ability to scale to more complex cases. What I'm trying to understand is what exactly is different in Diego's setup, since the exact cases reported here work fine for me, Andrea and any number of other people. Something strange is going on. We need to be patient and work through this, so if there's a bug in the already available infrastructure, we can flush it out :) Bruce > > -- > Cheers, > Jukka > > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 43+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-28 17:26 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 43+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2013-10-15 21:07 Custom defconfig is not used Diego Sueiro 2013-10-15 21:29 ` Katu Txakur 2013-10-15 21:49 ` Rudolf Streif 2013-10-15 21:55 ` Andrea Adami 2013-10-16 17:25 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-16 18:19 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-17 3:56 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-17 10:39 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-17 12:50 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-17 13:15 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-17 13:19 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-17 13:51 ` Andrea Adami 2013-10-17 15:47 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-18 4:48 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-18 9:17 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-18 20:17 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-22 16:23 ` Mike Lewis 2013-10-22 22:10 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-24 0:17 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-25 11:43 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-25 18:44 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-26 1:19 ` Mike Lewis 2013-10-26 10:57 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-26 14:54 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-28 20:58 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-28 21:41 ` Mike Lewis 2013-10-29 10:33 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-29 11:00 ` Andrea Adami 2013-10-29 14:55 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-29 15:31 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-30 13:04 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-30 13:54 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-30 14:08 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-10-30 14:26 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-11-04 3:14 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-11-28 15:37 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-11-28 15:49 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-11-28 16:26 ` Diego Sueiro 2013-11-28 16:28 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-11-28 16:41 ` Paul Eggleton 2013-11-28 17:26 ` Bruce Ashfield 2013-10-30 7:57 ` Jukka Rissanen 2013-10-30 12:27 ` Bruce Ashfield
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.