All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, <joro@8bytes.org>,
	<will@kernel.org>, <dwmw2@infradead.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	<thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>, <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/5] iommu: Enhance IOMMU default DMA mode build options
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:11:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <953e1210-c88f-3e50-fbb9-cc559923829e@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4c85f00-918b-5952-7585-8e1110ac5195@linux.intel.com>

On 12/06/2021 02:21, Lu Baolu wrote:
> On 2021/6/11 20:20, John Garry wrote:
>> +config IOMMU_DEFAULT_LAZY
>> +    bool "lazy"
>> +    help
>> +      Support lazy mode, where for every IOMMU DMA unmap operation, the
>> +      flush operation of IOTLB and the free operation of IOVA are 
>> deferred.
>> +      They are only guaranteed to be done before the related IOVA 
>> will be
>> +      reused.
>> +
>> +      The isolation provided in this mode is not as secure as STRICT 
>> mode,
>> +      such that a vulnerable time window may be created between the DMA
>> +      unmap and the mapping finally being torn down in the IOMMU, 
>> where the
>> +      device can still access the system memory. However this mode may
> 
> " ... and the mappings cached in the IOMMU IOTLB or device TLB finally
> being invalidated, where the device probably can still access the memory
> which has already been unmapped by the device driver."

ok, I can try to incorporate some of this wording.

As for this:

On 12/06/2021 03:12, Lu Baolu wrote:
 > On 2021/6/11 20:20, John Garry wrote:
 >> +choice
 >> +    prompt "IOMMU default DMA mode"
 >
 > This is not explicit.
 >
 > How about
 >
 > "IOMMU DMA default cache invalidation policy"
 >
 > ?
 >

OK, but I'd rather use IOTLB, as that better matches the relevant 
iommu.c API name (iommu_ops.flush_iotlb_all).

Thanks,
john

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, <joro@8bytes.org>,
	<will@kernel.org>,  <dwmw2@infradead.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/5] iommu: Enhance IOMMU default DMA mode build options
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:11:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <953e1210-c88f-3e50-fbb9-cc559923829e@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4c85f00-918b-5952-7585-8e1110ac5195@linux.intel.com>

On 12/06/2021 02:21, Lu Baolu wrote:
> On 2021/6/11 20:20, John Garry wrote:
>> +config IOMMU_DEFAULT_LAZY
>> +    bool "lazy"
>> +    help
>> +      Support lazy mode, where for every IOMMU DMA unmap operation, the
>> +      flush operation of IOTLB and the free operation of IOVA are 
>> deferred.
>> +      They are only guaranteed to be done before the related IOVA 
>> will be
>> +      reused.
>> +
>> +      The isolation provided in this mode is not as secure as STRICT 
>> mode,
>> +      such that a vulnerable time window may be created between the DMA
>> +      unmap and the mapping finally being torn down in the IOMMU, 
>> where the
>> +      device can still access the system memory. However this mode may
> 
> " ... and the mappings cached in the IOMMU IOTLB or device TLB finally
> being invalidated, where the device probably can still access the memory
> which has already been unmapped by the device driver."

ok, I can try to incorporate some of this wording.

As for this:

On 12/06/2021 03:12, Lu Baolu wrote:
 > On 2021/6/11 20:20, John Garry wrote:
 >> +choice
 >> +    prompt "IOMMU default DMA mode"
 >
 > This is not explicit.
 >
 > How about
 >
 > "IOMMU DMA default cache invalidation policy"
 >
 > ?
 >

OK, but I'd rather use IOTLB, as that better matches the relevant 
iommu.c API name (iommu_ops.flush_iotlb_all).

Thanks,
john
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-14  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-11 12:20 [PATCH v12 0/5] Enhance IOMMU default DMA mode build options John Garry
2021-06-11 12:20 ` John Garry
2021-06-11 12:20 ` [PATCH v12 1/5] iommu: Print strict or lazy mode at init time John Garry
2021-06-11 12:20   ` John Garry
2021-06-14 15:54   ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 15:54     ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-11 12:20 ` [PATCH v12 2/5] iommu: Enhance IOMMU default DMA mode build options John Garry
2021-06-11 12:20   ` John Garry
2021-06-12  1:21   ` Lu Baolu
2021-06-12  1:21     ` Lu Baolu
2021-06-14  8:11     ` John Garry [this message]
2021-06-14  8:11       ` John Garry
2021-06-12  2:12   ` Lu Baolu
2021-06-12  2:12     ` Lu Baolu
2021-06-14 16:03   ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 16:03     ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-11 12:20 ` [PATCH v12 3/5] iommu/vt-d: Add support for " John Garry
2021-06-11 12:20   ` John Garry
2021-06-12  2:14   ` Lu Baolu
2021-06-12  2:14     ` Lu Baolu
2021-06-14  8:03     ` John Garry
2021-06-14  8:03       ` John Garry
2021-06-15  7:26       ` Lu Baolu
2021-06-15  7:26         ` Lu Baolu
2021-06-15  8:25         ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-15  8:25           ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-16  8:42           ` Lu Baolu
2021-06-16  8:42             ` Lu Baolu
2021-06-12  2:22   ` Lu Baolu
2021-06-12  2:22     ` Lu Baolu
2021-06-14  7:53     ` John Garry
2021-06-14  7:53       ` John Garry
2021-06-14 14:11       ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 14:11         ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 14:19         ` John Garry
2021-06-14 14:19           ` John Garry
2021-06-14 15:05           ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 15:05             ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-11 12:20 ` [PATCH v12 4/5] iommu/amd: " John Garry
2021-06-11 12:20   ` John Garry
2021-06-11 12:20 ` [PATCH v12 5/5] iommu: Remove mode argument from iommu_set_dma_strict() John Garry
2021-06-11 12:20   ` John Garry
2021-06-12  2:23   ` Lu Baolu
2021-06-12  2:23     ` Lu Baolu
2021-06-14  7:46     ` John Garry
2021-06-14  7:46       ` John Garry
2021-06-14 16:25   ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 16:25     ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 17:03     ` John Garry
2021-06-14 17:03       ` John Garry
2021-06-14 17:19       ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 17:19         ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 17:24         ` John Garry
2021-06-14 17:24           ` John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=953e1210-c88f-3e50-fbb9-cc559923829e@huawei.com \
    --to=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.