All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Sagar Kadam <sagar.kadam@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] irqchip/sifive-plic: Add support for Renesas RZ/Five SoC
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:06:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+V-a8uLzLJ=wB6oUu0b2oZO=FPSCTSrqb=3m9=BJxATFKmjMw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdVt9FjCtvMgJcCh=g2b+8b-fgabGbOLDcXNrrPMpC+3jQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Geert,

On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 9:53 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 2:19 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Jun 2022 10:38:18 +0100,
> > "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 9:56 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 26 Jun 2022 01:43:26 +0100,
> > > > Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> wrote:
> > > > > The Renesas RZ/Five SoC has a RISC-V AX45MP AndesCore with NCEPLIC100. The
> > > > > NCEPLIC100 supports both edge-triggered and level-triggered interrupts. In
> > > > > case of edge-triggered interrupts NCEPLIC100 ignores the next interrupt
> > > > > edge until the previous completion message has been received and
> > > > > NCEPLIC100 doesn't support pending interrupt counter, hence losing the
> > > > > interrupts if not acknowledged in time.
> > > > >
> > > > > So the workaround for edge-triggered interrupts to be handled correctly
> > > > > and without losing is that it needs to be acknowledged first and then
> > > > > handler must be run so that we don't miss on the next edge-triggered
> > > > > interrupt.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch adds a new compatible string for Renesas RZ/Five SoC and adds
> > > > > support to change interrupt flow based on the interrupt type. It also
> > > > > implements irq_ack and irq_set_type callbacks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
>
> > > > > +     if (of_device_is_compatible(node, "renesas,r9a07g043-plic")) {
> > > > > +             priv->of_data = RENESAS_R9A07G043_PLIC;
> > > > > +             plic_chip.name = "Renesas RZ/Five PLIC";
> > > >
> > > > NAK. The irq_chip structure isn't the place for platform marketing.
> > > > This is way too long anyway (and same for the edge version), and you
> > > > even sent me a patch to make that structure const...
> > > >
> > > My bad will drop this.
> >
> > And why you're at it, please turn this rather random 'of_data' into
> > something like:
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > index bb87e4c3b88e..cd1683b77caf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > @@ -64,6 +64,10 @@ struct plic_priv {
> >         struct cpumask lmask;
> >         struct irq_domain *irqdomain;
> >         void __iomem *regs;
> > +       enum {
> > +               VANILLA_PLIC,
> > +               RENESAS_R9A07G043_PLIC,
> > +       } flavour;
> >  };
> >
> >  struct plic_handler {
> >
> > to give some structure to the whole thing, because I'm pretty sure
> > we'll see more braindead implementations as time goes by.
>
> What about using a feature flag (e.g. had_edge_irqs) instead?
>

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
index 9f16833dcb41..247c3c98b655 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
@@ -60,13 +60,13 @@
 #define        PLIC_DISABLE_THRESHOLD          0x7
 #define        PLIC_ENABLE_THRESHOLD           0

+#define PLIC_QUIRK_EDGE_INTERRUPT      BIT(0)

 struct plic_priv {
        struct cpumask lmask;
        struct irq_domain *irqdomain;
        void __iomem *regs;
+       u32 plic_quirks;
 };

What about something like above?

Cheers,
Prabhakar

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
	 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Sagar Kadam <sagar.kadam@sifive.com>,
	 Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	 linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	 "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	 Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] irqchip/sifive-plic: Add support for Renesas RZ/Five SoC
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:06:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+V-a8uLzLJ=wB6oUu0b2oZO=FPSCTSrqb=3m9=BJxATFKmjMw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdVt9FjCtvMgJcCh=g2b+8b-fgabGbOLDcXNrrPMpC+3jQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Geert,

On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 9:53 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 2:19 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Jun 2022 10:38:18 +0100,
> > "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 9:56 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 26 Jun 2022 01:43:26 +0100,
> > > > Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> wrote:
> > > > > The Renesas RZ/Five SoC has a RISC-V AX45MP AndesCore with NCEPLIC100. The
> > > > > NCEPLIC100 supports both edge-triggered and level-triggered interrupts. In
> > > > > case of edge-triggered interrupts NCEPLIC100 ignores the next interrupt
> > > > > edge until the previous completion message has been received and
> > > > > NCEPLIC100 doesn't support pending interrupt counter, hence losing the
> > > > > interrupts if not acknowledged in time.
> > > > >
> > > > > So the workaround for edge-triggered interrupts to be handled correctly
> > > > > and without losing is that it needs to be acknowledged first and then
> > > > > handler must be run so that we don't miss on the next edge-triggered
> > > > > interrupt.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch adds a new compatible string for Renesas RZ/Five SoC and adds
> > > > > support to change interrupt flow based on the interrupt type. It also
> > > > > implements irq_ack and irq_set_type callbacks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
>
> > > > > +     if (of_device_is_compatible(node, "renesas,r9a07g043-plic")) {
> > > > > +             priv->of_data = RENESAS_R9A07G043_PLIC;
> > > > > +             plic_chip.name = "Renesas RZ/Five PLIC";
> > > >
> > > > NAK. The irq_chip structure isn't the place for platform marketing.
> > > > This is way too long anyway (and same for the edge version), and you
> > > > even sent me a patch to make that structure const...
> > > >
> > > My bad will drop this.
> >
> > And why you're at it, please turn this rather random 'of_data' into
> > something like:
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > index bb87e4c3b88e..cd1683b77caf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > @@ -64,6 +64,10 @@ struct plic_priv {
> >         struct cpumask lmask;
> >         struct irq_domain *irqdomain;
> >         void __iomem *regs;
> > +       enum {
> > +               VANILLA_PLIC,
> > +               RENESAS_R9A07G043_PLIC,
> > +       } flavour;
> >  };
> >
> >  struct plic_handler {
> >
> > to give some structure to the whole thing, because I'm pretty sure
> > we'll see more braindead implementations as time goes by.
>
> What about using a feature flag (e.g. had_edge_irqs) instead?
>

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
index 9f16833dcb41..247c3c98b655 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
@@ -60,13 +60,13 @@
 #define        PLIC_DISABLE_THRESHOLD          0x7
 #define        PLIC_ENABLE_THRESHOLD           0

+#define PLIC_QUIRK_EDGE_INTERRUPT      BIT(0)

 struct plic_priv {
        struct cpumask lmask;
        struct irq_domain *irqdomain;
        void __iomem *regs;
+       u32 plic_quirks;
 };

What about something like above?

Cheers,
Prabhakar

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-27 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-26  0:43 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add PLIC support for Renesas RZ/Five SoC Lad Prabhakar
2022-06-26  0:43 ` Lad Prabhakar
2022-06-26  0:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: sifive,plic: Document " Lad Prabhakar
2022-06-26  0:43   ` Lad Prabhakar
2022-06-26 12:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-06-26 12:35     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-06-27 12:27     ` Lad, Prabhakar
2022-06-27 12:27       ` Lad, Prabhakar
2022-06-27 14:22       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-06-27 14:22         ` Marc Zyngier
2022-06-27 14:29         ` Lad, Prabhakar
2022-06-27 14:29           ` Lad, Prabhakar
2022-06-26  0:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] irqchip/sifive-plic: Add support for " Lad Prabhakar
2022-06-26  0:43   ` Lad Prabhakar
2022-06-26  8:57   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-06-26  8:57     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-06-26  9:38     ` Lad, Prabhakar
2022-06-26  9:38       ` Lad, Prabhakar
2022-06-26 12:19       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-06-26 12:19         ` Marc Zyngier
2022-06-27  8:53         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-27  8:53           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-27 10:11           ` Marc Zyngier
2022-06-27 10:11             ` Marc Zyngier
2022-06-27 13:06           ` Lad, Prabhakar [this message]
2022-06-27 13:06             ` Lad, Prabhakar
2022-06-27 13:12             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-27 13:12               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-27 13:53               ` Marc Zyngier
2022-06-27 13:53                 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-06-27 14:16                 ` Lad, Prabhakar
2022-06-27 14:16                   ` Lad, Prabhakar
2022-06-29 13:41                   ` Pavel Machek
2022-06-29 13:41                     ` Pavel Machek
2022-06-29 15:00                     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-06-29 15:00                       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-06-27  4:55   ` Samuel Holland
2022-06-27  4:55     ` Samuel Holland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+V-a8uLzLJ=wB6oUu0b2oZO=FPSCTSrqb=3m9=BJxATFKmjMw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
    --cc=biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sagar.kadam@sifive.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.