From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 14:22:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQFaM7nOhD2d6SUQ@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3e929a77303dd47fd2adc2a1011009d3bfcee20.1627424774.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 05:26:05PM -0500, Tom Lendacky via iommu wrote:
> Introduce an x86 version of the prot_guest_has() function. This will be
> used in the more generic x86 code to replace vendor specific calls like
> sev_active(), etc.
>
> While the name suggests this is intended mainly for guests, it will
> also be used for host memory encryption checks in place of sme_active().
>
> The amd_prot_guest_has() function does not use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for the
> same reasons previously stated when changing sme_active(), sev_active and
None of that applies here as none of the callers get pulled into
random macros. The only case of that is sme_me_mask through
sme_mask, but that's not something this series replaces as far as I can
tell.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 14:22:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQFaM7nOhD2d6SUQ@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3e929a77303dd47fd2adc2a1011009d3bfcee20.1627424774.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 05:26:05PM -0500, Tom Lendacky via iommu wrote:
> Introduce an x86 version of the prot_guest_has() function. This will be
> used in the more generic x86 code to replace vendor specific calls like
> sev_active(), etc.
>
> While the name suggests this is intended mainly for guests, it will
> also be used for host memory encryption checks in place of sme_active().
>
> The amd_prot_guest_has() function does not use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for the
> same reasons previously stated when changing sme_active(), sev_active and
None of that applies here as none of the callers get pulled into
random macros. The only case of that is sme_me_mask through
sme_mask, but that's not something this series replaces as far as I can
tell.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 14:22:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQFaM7nOhD2d6SUQ@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3e929a77303dd47fd2adc2a1011009d3bfcee20.1627424774.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 05:26:05PM -0500, Tom Lendacky via iommu wrote:
> Introduce an x86 version of the prot_guest_has() function. This will be
> used in the more generic x86 code to replace vendor specific calls like
> sev_active(), etc.
>
> While the name suggests this is intended mainly for guests, it will
> also be used for host memory encryption checks in place of sme_active().
>
> The amd_prot_guest_has() function does not use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for the
> same reasons previously stated when changing sme_active(), sev_active and
None of that applies here as none of the callers get pulled into
random macros. The only case of that is sme_me_mask through
sme_mask, but that's not something this series replaces as far as I can
tell.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 14:22:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQFaM7nOhD2d6SUQ@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3e929a77303dd47fd2adc2a1011009d3bfcee20.1627424774.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 05:26:05PM -0500, Tom Lendacky via iommu wrote:
> Introduce an x86 version of the prot_guest_has() function. This will be
> used in the more generic x86 code to replace vendor specific calls like
> sev_active(), etc.
>
> While the name suggests this is intended mainly for guests, it will
> also be used for host memory encryption checks in place of sme_active().
>
> The amd_prot_guest_has() function does not use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for the
> same reasons previously stated when changing sme_active(), sev_active and
None of that applies here as none of the callers get pulled into
random macros. The only case of that is sme_me_mask through
sme_mask, but that's not something this series replaces as far as I can
tell.
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 14:22:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQFaM7nOhD2d6SUQ@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3e929a77303dd47fd2adc2a1011009d3bfcee20.1627424774.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 05:26:05PM -0500, Tom Lendacky via iommu wrote:
> Introduce an x86 version of the prot_guest_has() function. This will be
> used in the more generic x86 code to replace vendor specific calls like
> sev_active(), etc.
>
> While the name suggests this is intended mainly for guests, it will
> also be used for host memory encryption checks in place of sme_active().
>
> The amd_prot_guest_has() function does not use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for the
> same reasons previously stated when changing sme_active(), sev_active and
None of that applies here as none of the callers get pulled into
random macros. The only case of that is sme_me_mask through
sme_mask, but that's not something this series replaces as far as I can
tell.
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-28 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 214+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-27 22:26 [PATCH 00/11] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 01/11] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-28 13:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 16:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-07-28 16:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-07-28 16:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-07-28 16:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-07-28 16:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-02 10:34 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:34 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:34 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:34 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-11 14:53 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-11 14:53 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-11 14:53 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-11 14:53 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-11 14:53 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-11 15:39 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-11 15:39 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-11 15:39 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-11 15:39 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-11 15:39 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 02/11] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has() Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-28 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-07-28 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-29 14:24 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-29 14:24 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-29 14:24 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-29 14:24 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-29 14:24 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:35 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:35 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:35 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:35 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 03/11] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 04/11] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with prot_guest_has() Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:37 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:37 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:37 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:37 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 05/11] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:42 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:42 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:42 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:42 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 06/11] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_es_active() " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:45 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:45 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:45 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:45 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-09 21:59 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 21:59 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 21:59 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 21:59 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-09 21:59 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:08 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 22:08 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 22:08 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 22:08 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 22:08 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-30 22:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-30 22:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-30 22:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-30 22:34 ` Sean Christopherson via iommu
2021-07-30 22:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-09 21:55 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 21:55 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 21:55 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 21:55 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-09 21:55 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 12:42 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-08-02 12:42 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-08-02 12:42 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-08-02 12:42 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-08-02 12:42 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-08-09 22:04 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:04 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:04 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:04 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-09 22:04 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-10 18:45 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 18:45 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 18:45 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 18:45 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 18:45 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 19:48 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-10 19:48 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-10 19:48 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-10 19:48 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-10 19:48 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-10 20:09 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 20:09 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 20:09 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 20:09 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 20:09 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-11 12:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-11 12:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-11 12:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-11 12:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-11 12:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-11 15:52 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-11 15:52 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-11 15:52 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-11 15:52 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-11 15:52 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-12 10:07 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-12 10:07 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-12 10:07 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-12 10:07 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-12 10:07 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-13 17:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 17:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 17:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 17:08 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-13 17:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 20:17 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 20:17 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 20:17 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 20:17 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-13 20:17 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 08/11] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:47 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:47 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:47 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:47 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86/sev: " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:46 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:46 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:46 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:46 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 10/11] powerpc/pseries/svm: " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 11/11] s390/mm: " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 00/11] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-28 11:50 ` Christian König
2021-07-28 11:50 ` Christian König
2021-07-28 11:50 ` Christian König
2021-07-28 11:50 ` Christian König
2021-07-28 11:50 ` Christian König
2021-07-28 11:50 ` Christian König
2021-08-09 1:41 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 1:41 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 1:41 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 1:41 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 1:41 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 22:16 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:16 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:16 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:16 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-09 22:16 ` Tom Lendacky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YQFaM7nOhD2d6SUQ@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.