All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	<xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] xen/arm: set the system time in Xen via the XENPF_settime64 hypercall
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:58:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511101557230.5676@kaball.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4039287.QS1nrAMb0E@wuerfel>

On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 November 2015 11:57:55 Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > +       op.u.settime64.nsecs = now.tv_nsec;
> > +       op.u.settime64.system_time = arch_timer_read_counter() * (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC;
> > +       do_div(op.u.settime64.system_time, arch_timer_get_rate());
> 
> NSEC_PER_SEC is a large number, doesn't that multiplication overflow the
> 64-bit system_time variable?

It could be a concern, you are right. I think I can solve this issue and
remove multiple do_divs by calculating nsec_per_tick at initialization
time and use it here and in xen_read_wallclock.


> > +       printk("GTOD: Setting to %llu.%u at %llu\n",
> 
> 				   %llu.%09u
> 
> so you get the leading zeroes.
> 
> > +              op.u.settime64.secs,
> > +              op.u.settime64.nsecs,
> > +              op.u.settime64.system_time);
> > +       (void)HYPERVISOR_platform_op(&op);
> 
> 	Arnd
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com (Stefano Stabellini)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 7/7] xen/arm: set the system time in Xen via the XENPF_settime64 hypercall
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:58:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511101557230.5676@kaball.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4039287.QS1nrAMb0E@wuerfel>

On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 November 2015 11:57:55 Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > +       op.u.settime64.nsecs = now.tv_nsec;
> > +       op.u.settime64.system_time = arch_timer_read_counter() * (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC;
> > +       do_div(op.u.settime64.system_time, arch_timer_get_rate());
> 
> NSEC_PER_SEC is a large number, doesn't that multiplication overflow the
> 64-bit system_time variable?

It could be a concern, you are right. I think I can solve this issue and
remove multiple do_divs by calculating nsec_per_tick at initialization
time and use it here and in xen_read_wallclock.


> > +       printk("GTOD: Setting to %llu.%u at %llu\n",
> 
> 				   %llu.%09u
> 
> so you get the leading zeroes.
> 
> > +              op.u.settime64.secs,
> > +              op.u.settime64.nsecs,
> > +              op.u.settime64.system_time);
> > +       (void)HYPERVISOR_platform_op(&op);
> 
> 	Arnd
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ian.Campbell@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] xen/arm: set the system time in Xen via the XENPF_settime64 hypercall
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:58:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511101557230.5676@kaball.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4039287.QS1nrAMb0E@wuerfel>

On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 November 2015 11:57:55 Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > +       op.u.settime64.nsecs = now.tv_nsec;
> > +       op.u.settime64.system_time = arch_timer_read_counter() * (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC;
> > +       do_div(op.u.settime64.system_time, arch_timer_get_rate());
> 
> NSEC_PER_SEC is a large number, doesn't that multiplication overflow the
> 64-bit system_time variable?

It could be a concern, you are right. I think I can solve this issue and
remove multiple do_divs by calculating nsec_per_tick at initialization
time and use it here and in xen_read_wallclock.


> > +       printk("GTOD: Setting to %llu.%u at %llu\n",
> 
> 				   %llu.%09u
> 
> so you get the leading zeroes.
> 
> > +              op.u.settime64.secs,
> > +              op.u.settime64.nsecs,
> > +              op.u.settime64.system_time);
> > +       (void)HYPERVISOR_platform_op(&op);
> 
> 	Arnd
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-10 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-10 11:56 [PATCH v2 0/7] Xen wallclock on arm and arm64 Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:56 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:56 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] timekeeping: introduce __current_kernel_time64 Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 12:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-10 12:22     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-10 14:34     ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 14:34       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 14:34       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 12:29   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 12:29     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 12:29     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 15:10     ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 15:10       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 15:10       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 15:26       ` John Stultz
2015-11-10 15:26         ` John Stultz
2015-11-10 15:26         ` John Stultz
2015-11-10 15:31         ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-10 15:31           ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-10 15:31           ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-10 15:41           ` John Stultz
2015-11-10 15:41             ` John Stultz
2015-11-10 15:41             ` John Stultz
2015-11-10 15:55             ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-10 15:55               ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-10 15:55               ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-11 11:51               ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-11 11:51                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-11 11:51                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-11 13:31                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-11 13:31                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-11 13:31                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] xen: rename dom0_op to platform_op Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] xen/arm: introduce HYPERVISOR_platform_op on arm and arm64 Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] xen: introduce XENPF_settime64 Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 12:32   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 12:32     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 14:43     ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 14:43       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 14:43       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 14:47       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 14:47         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] arm: extend pvclock_wall_clock with sec_hi Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] xen/arm: introduce xen_read_wallclock Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 12:35   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 12:35     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] xen/arm: set the system time in Xen via the XENPF_settime64 hypercall Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 12:39   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 12:39     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 15:58     ` Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2015-11-10 15:58       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 15:58       ` Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1511101557230.5676@kaball.uk.xensource.com \
    --to=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.