All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] timekeeping: introduce __current_kernel_time64
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:31:33 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1511101028320.3915@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALAqxLUEOWP6CJxY021nDR6cEQf3VZtm8fa9waK2a=OmQJEO-g@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, John Stultz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Stefano Stabellini
> <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 10 November 2015 11:57:49 Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >> > __current_kernel_time64 returns a struct timespec64, without taking the
> >> > xtime lock. Mirrors __current_kernel_time/current_kernel_time.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Actually it doesn't mirror __current_kernel_time/current_kernel_time
> >>
> >> > diff --git a/include/linux/timekeeping.h b/include/linux/timekeeping.h
> >> > index ec89d84..b5802bf 100644
> >> > --- a/include/linux/timekeeping.h
> >> > +++ b/include/linux/timekeeping.h
> >> > @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ extern int do_sys_settimeofday(const struct timespec *tv,
> >> >   */
> >> >  unsigned long get_seconds(void);
> >> >  struct timespec64 current_kernel_time64(void);
> >> > -/* does not take xtime_lock */
> >> > +/* do not take xtime_lock */
> >> > +struct timespec64 __current_kernel_time64(void);
> >> >  struct timespec __current_kernel_time(void);
> >>
> >> Please change __current_kernel_time into a static inline function
> >> while you are introducing the new one, to match the patch description ;-)
> >
> > The implementation is:
> >
> >         struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.timekeeper;
> >
> >         return timespec64_to_timespec(tk_xtime(tk));
> >
> > which cannot be easily made into a static inline, unless we start
> > exporting tk_core.
> 
> So the timekeeper is passed to the notifier. So you probably want something like
> 
> struct timespec64 __current_kernel_time64(struct timekeeper *tk)
> {
>  return timespec64_to_timespec(tk_xtime(tk));
> }
> 
> Then you can cast the priv pointer in the notifier to a timekeeper and
> use it that way?

Err no. Look at commit 8758a240e2d74c5932ab51a73377e6507b7fd441

i.e. Add the new 64bit function and make the existing one a static
inline which does the timespec64 to timespec conversion.

Thanks,

	tglx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tglx@linutronix.de (Thomas Gleixner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] timekeeping: introduce __current_kernel_time64
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:31:33 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1511101028320.3915@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALAqxLUEOWP6CJxY021nDR6cEQf3VZtm8fa9waK2a=OmQJEO-g@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, John Stultz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Stefano Stabellini
> <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 10 November 2015 11:57:49 Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >> > __current_kernel_time64 returns a struct timespec64, without taking the
> >> > xtime lock. Mirrors __current_kernel_time/current_kernel_time.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Actually it doesn't mirror __current_kernel_time/current_kernel_time
> >>
> >> > diff --git a/include/linux/timekeeping.h b/include/linux/timekeeping.h
> >> > index ec89d84..b5802bf 100644
> >> > --- a/include/linux/timekeeping.h
> >> > +++ b/include/linux/timekeeping.h
> >> > @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ extern int do_sys_settimeofday(const struct timespec *tv,
> >> >   */
> >> >  unsigned long get_seconds(void);
> >> >  struct timespec64 current_kernel_time64(void);
> >> > -/* does not take xtime_lock */
> >> > +/* do not take xtime_lock */
> >> > +struct timespec64 __current_kernel_time64(void);
> >> >  struct timespec __current_kernel_time(void);
> >>
> >> Please change __current_kernel_time into a static inline function
> >> while you are introducing the new one, to match the patch description ;-)
> >
> > The implementation is:
> >
> >         struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.timekeeper;
> >
> >         return timespec64_to_timespec(tk_xtime(tk));
> >
> > which cannot be easily made into a static inline, unless we start
> > exporting tk_core.
> 
> So the timekeeper is passed to the notifier. So you probably want something like
> 
> struct timespec64 __current_kernel_time64(struct timekeeper *tk)
> {
>  return timespec64_to_timespec(tk_xtime(tk));
> }
> 
> Then you can cast the priv pointer in the notifier to a timekeeper and
> use it that way?

Err no. Look at commit 8758a240e2d74c5932ab51a73377e6507b7fd441

i.e. Add the new 64bit function and make the existing one a static
inline which does the timespec64 to timespec conversion.

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-10 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-10 11:56 [PATCH v2 0/7] Xen wallclock on arm and arm64 Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:56 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:56 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] timekeeping: introduce __current_kernel_time64 Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 12:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-10 12:22     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-10 14:34     ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 14:34       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 14:34       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 12:29   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 12:29     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 12:29     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 15:10     ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 15:10       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 15:10       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 15:26       ` John Stultz
2015-11-10 15:26         ` John Stultz
2015-11-10 15:26         ` John Stultz
2015-11-10 15:31         ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2015-11-10 15:31           ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-10 15:31           ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-10 15:41           ` John Stultz
2015-11-10 15:41             ` John Stultz
2015-11-10 15:41             ` John Stultz
2015-11-10 15:55             ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-10 15:55               ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-10 15:55               ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-11 11:51               ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-11 11:51                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-11 11:51                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-11 13:31                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-11 13:31                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-11 13:31                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] xen: rename dom0_op to platform_op Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] xen/arm: introduce HYPERVISOR_platform_op on arm and arm64 Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] xen: introduce XENPF_settime64 Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 12:32   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 12:32     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 14:43     ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 14:43       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 14:43       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 14:47       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 14:47         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] arm: extend pvclock_wall_clock with sec_hi Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] xen/arm: introduce xen_read_wallclock Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 12:35   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 12:35     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] xen/arm: set the system time in Xen via the XENPF_settime64 hypercall Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 12:39   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 12:39     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 15:58     ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 15:58       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 15:58       ` Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1511101028320.3915@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.