All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] block: Enhance blk_revalidate_disk_zones()
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 08:10:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc7bb317-28ec-dea7-a317-9936bda801b2@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191108015702.233102-2-damien.lemoal@wdc.com>

On 11/8/19 2:56 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> For ZBC and ZAC zoned devices, the scsi driver revalidation processing
> implemented by sd_revalidate_disk() includes a call to
> sd_zbc_read_zones() which executes a full disk zone report used to
> check that all zones of the disk are the same size. This processing is
> followed by a call to blk_revalidate_disk_zones(), used to initialize
> the device request queue zone bitmaps (zone type and zone write lock
> bitmaps). To do so, blk_revalidate_disk_zones() also executes a full
> device zone report to obtain zone types. As a result, the entire
> zoned block device revalidation process includes two full device zone
> report.
> 
> By moving the zone size checks into blk_revalidate_disk_zones(), this
> process can be optimized to a single full device zone report, leading to
> shorter device scan and revalidation times. This patch implements this
> optimization, reducing the original full device zone report implemented
> in sd_zbc_check_zones() to a single, small, report zones command
> execution to obtain the size of the first zone of the device. Checks
> whether all zones of the device are the same size as the first zone
> size are moved to the generic blk_check_zone() function called from
> blk_revalidate_disk_zones().
> 
> This optimization also has the following benefits:
> 1) fewer memory allocations in the scsi layer during disk revalidation
>    as the potentailly large buffer for zone report execution is not
>    needed.
> 2) Implement zone checks in a generic manner, reducing the burden on
>    device driver which only need to obtain the zone size and check that
>    this size is a power of 2 number of LBAs. Any new type of zoned
>    block device will benefit from this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-zoned.c     |  62 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c | 107 ++++++++----------------------------------
>  2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
> 
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@suse.de			                  +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 247165 (AG München), GF: Felix Imendörffer

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/9] block: Enhance blk_revalidate_disk_zones()
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 08:10:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc7bb317-28ec-dea7-a317-9936bda801b2@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191108015702.233102-2-damien.lemoal@wdc.com>

On 11/8/19 2:56 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> For ZBC and ZAC zoned devices, the scsi driver revalidation processing
> implemented by sd_revalidate_disk() includes a call to
> sd_zbc_read_zones() which executes a full disk zone report used to
> check that all zones of the disk are the same size. This processing is
> followed by a call to blk_revalidate_disk_zones(), used to initialize
> the device request queue zone bitmaps (zone type and zone write lock
> bitmaps). To do so, blk_revalidate_disk_zones() also executes a full
> device zone report to obtain zone types. As a result, the entire
> zoned block device revalidation process includes two full device zone
> report.
> 
> By moving the zone size checks into blk_revalidate_disk_zones(), this
> process can be optimized to a single full device zone report, leading to
> shorter device scan and revalidation times. This patch implements this
> optimization, reducing the original full device zone report implemented
> in sd_zbc_check_zones() to a single, small, report zones command
> execution to obtain the size of the first zone of the device. Checks
> whether all zones of the device are the same size as the first zone
> size are moved to the generic blk_check_zone() function called from
> blk_revalidate_disk_zones().
> 
> This optimization also has the following benefits:
> 1) fewer memory allocations in the scsi layer during disk revalidation
>    as the potentailly large buffer for zone report execution is not
>    needed.
> 2) Implement zone checks in a generic manner, reducing the burden on
>    device driver which only need to obtain the zone size and check that
>    this size is a power of 2 number of LBAs. Any new type of zoned
>    block device will benefit from this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-zoned.c     |  62 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c | 107 ++++++++----------------------------------
>  2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
> 
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@suse.de			                  +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 247165 (AG München), GF: Felix Imendörffer


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] block: Enhance blk_revalidate_disk_zones()
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 08:10:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc7bb317-28ec-dea7-a317-9936bda801b2@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191108015702.233102-2-damien.lemoal@wdc.com>

On 11/8/19 2:56 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> For ZBC and ZAC zoned devices, the scsi driver revalidation processing
> implemented by sd_revalidate_disk() includes a call to
> sd_zbc_read_zones() which executes a full disk zone report used to
> check that all zones of the disk are the same size. This processing is
> followed by a call to blk_revalidate_disk_zones(), used to initialize
> the device request queue zone bitmaps (zone type and zone write lock
> bitmaps). To do so, blk_revalidate_disk_zones() also executes a full
> device zone report to obtain zone types. As a result, the entire
> zoned block device revalidation process includes two full device zone
> report.
> 
> By moving the zone size checks into blk_revalidate_disk_zones(), this
> process can be optimized to a single full device zone report, leading to
> shorter device scan and revalidation times. This patch implements this
> optimization, reducing the original full device zone report implemented
> in sd_zbc_check_zones() to a single, small, report zones command
> execution to obtain the size of the first zone of the device. Checks
> whether all zones of the device are the same size as the first zone
> size are moved to the generic blk_check_zone() function called from
> blk_revalidate_disk_zones().
> 
> This optimization also has the following benefits:
> 1) fewer memory allocations in the scsi layer during disk revalidation
>    as the potentailly large buffer for zone report execution is not
>    needed.
> 2) Implement zone checks in a generic manner, reducing the burden on
>    device driver which only need to obtain the zone size and check that
>    this size is a power of 2 number of LBAs. Any new type of zoned
>    block device will benefit from this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-zoned.c     |  62 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c | 107 ++++++++----------------------------------
>  2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
> 
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@suse.de			                  +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 247165 (AG München), GF: Felix Imendörffer


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-08  7:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-08  1:56 [PATCH 0/9] Zoned block device enhancements and zone report rework Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  1:56 ` [f2fs-dev] " Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  1:56 ` [PATCH 1/9] block: Enhance blk_revalidate_disk_zones() Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  1:56   ` [f2fs-dev] " Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  6:28   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-08  6:28     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-08  6:28     ` [f2fs-dev] " Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-08  7:10   ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2019-11-08  7:10     ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08  7:10     ` [f2fs-dev] " Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08  1:56 ` [PATCH 2/9] block: cleanup the !zoned case in blk_revalidate_disk_zones Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  1:56   ` [f2fs-dev] " Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  7:11   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08  7:11     ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08  7:11     ` [f2fs-dev] " Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08 18:50   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-11-08 18:50     ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-11-08 18:50     ` [f2fs-dev] " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-11-08  1:56 ` [PATCH 3/9] block: Simplify report zones execution Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  1:56   ` [f2fs-dev] " Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  7:12   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08  7:12     ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08  7:12     ` [f2fs-dev] " Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08  1:56 ` [PATCH 4/9] block: Remove partition support for zoned block devices Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  1:56   ` [f2fs-dev] " Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  6:30   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-08  6:30     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-08  6:30     ` [f2fs-dev] " Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-08  7:17   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08  7:17     ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08  7:17     ` [f2fs-dev] " Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08  7:28     ` Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  7:28       ` Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  7:28       ` [f2fs-dev] " Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  1:56 ` [PATCH 5/9] null_blk: clean up the block device operations Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  1:56   ` [f2fs-dev] " Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  7:17   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08  7:17     ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08  7:17     ` [f2fs-dev] " Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08 18:47   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-11-08 18:47     ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-11-08 18:47     ` [f2fs-dev] " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-11-08  1:56 ` [PATCH 6/9] null_blk: clean up report zones Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  1:56   ` [f2fs-dev] " Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  7:18   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08  7:18     ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08  7:18     ` [f2fs-dev] " Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08 18:47   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-11-08 18:47     ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-11-08 18:47     ` [f2fs-dev] " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-11-08  1:57 ` [PATCH 7/9] null_blk: Add zone_nr_conv to features Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  1:57   ` [f2fs-dev] " Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  7:18   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08  7:18     ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08  7:18     ` [f2fs-dev] " Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08 18:48   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-11-08 18:48     ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-11-08 18:48     ` [f2fs-dev] " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-11-08  1:57 ` [PATCH 8/9] scsi: sd_zbc: Cleanup sd_zbc_alloc_report_buffer() Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  1:57   ` [f2fs-dev] " Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  6:31   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-08  6:31     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-08  6:31     ` [f2fs-dev] " Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-08  7:20   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08  7:20     ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08  7:20     ` [f2fs-dev] " Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08 19:06   ` [dm-devel] " Bart Van Assche
2019-11-08 19:06     ` [f2fs-dev] " Bart Van Assche
2019-11-09  2:54     ` Damien Le Moal
2019-11-09  2:54       ` Damien Le Moal
2019-11-09  2:54       ` [f2fs-dev] " Damien Le Moal
2019-11-09  3:02       ` Bart Van Assche
2019-11-09  3:02         ` Bart Van Assche
2019-11-09  3:02         ` [f2fs-dev] " Bart Van Assche
2019-11-08  1:57 ` [PATCH 9/9] block: rework zone reporting Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  1:57   ` [f2fs-dev] " Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08  7:23   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08  7:23     ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08  7:23     ` [f2fs-dev] " Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08 15:16   ` Mike Snitzer
2019-11-08 15:16     ` Mike Snitzer
2019-11-08 15:16     ` [f2fs-dev] " Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bc7bb317-28ec-dea7-a317-9936bda801b2@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.