[PATCH 0/1] Reg: igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@* CRC mismatch test failures

[PATCH 0/1] Reg: igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@* CRC mismatch test failures

[Harish Chegondi]

This patch fixes the igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@* test failures due to CRC mismatch
on CI BYT squawks chromebook as reported in:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103191

These CRC mismatch test failures happen consistently on BYT squawks chromebook
These test failures happen very intermittently on shard-SKL and CML-U systems.
This patch fixes these test failures on the BYT platform. The reason for these
CRC test failures happening on SKL and CML-U platforms is still unknown and is
being investigated.

Thanks
Harish.

Harish Chegondi (1):
  drm/i915: skip the second CRC even for GEN 7 GPUs

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
2.21.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: skip the second CRC even for GEN 7 GPUs

[Harish Chegondi]

display_pipe_crc_irq_handler() skips the first CRC for all GPUs and the
second CRC for GEN8+ GPUs. The second CRC is invalid even for BYT which
is a GEN7 GPU. So, skip the second CRC even for GEN7 GPUs.

Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>
Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103191
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 233211fde0ea..3809e9f7fae2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -1775,11 +1775,11 @@ static void display_pipe_crc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	 * bonkers. So let's just wait for the next vblank and read
 	 * out the buggy result.
 	 *
-	 * On GEN8+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
+	 * On GEN7+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
 	 * don't trust that one either.
 	 */
 	if (pipe_crc->skipped <= 0 ||
-	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
+	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 7 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
 		pipe_crc->skipped++;
 		spin_unlock(&pipe_crc->lock);
 		return;
-- 
2.21.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: skip the second CRC even for GEN 7 GPUs

[Jani Nikula]

On Wed, 15 May 2019, Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com> wrote:
> display_pipe_crc_irq_handler() skips the first CRC for all GPUs and the
> second CRC for GEN8+ GPUs. The second CRC is invalid even for BYT which
> is a GEN7 GPU. So, skip the second CRC even for GEN7 GPUs.
>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>
> Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>
> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103191

s/References:/Bugzilla:/

Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>


> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index 233211fde0ea..3809e9f7fae2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -1775,11 +1775,11 @@ static void display_pipe_crc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	 * bonkers. So let's just wait for the next vblank and read
>  	 * out the buggy result.
>  	 *
> -	 * On GEN8+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
> +	 * On GEN7+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
>  	 * don't trust that one either.
>  	 */
>  	if (pipe_crc->skipped <= 0 ||
> -	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
> +	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 7 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
>  		pipe_crc->skipped++;
>  		spin_unlock(&pipe_crc->lock);
>  		return;

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: skip the second CRC even for GEN 7 GPUs

[Maarten Lankhorst]

Op 16-05-2019 om 07:58 schreef Harish Chegondi:
> display_pipe_crc_irq_handler() skips the first CRC for all GPUs and the
> second CRC for GEN8+ GPUs. The second CRC is invalid even for BYT which
> is a GEN7 GPU. So, skip the second CRC even for GEN7 GPUs.
>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>
> Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>
> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103191
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index 233211fde0ea..3809e9f7fae2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -1775,11 +1775,11 @@ static void display_pipe_crc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	 * bonkers. So let's just wait for the next vblank and read
>  	 * out the buggy result.
>  	 *
> -	 * On GEN8+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
> +	 * On GEN7+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
>  	 * don't trust that one either.
>  	 */
>  	if (pipe_crc->skipped <= 0 ||
> -	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
> +	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 7 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
>  		pipe_crc->skipped++;
>  		spin_unlock(&pipe_crc->lock);
>  		return;

I would be interested in the results, haswell is different from VLV. Has it ever been observed on that platform?

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: skip the second CRC even for GEN 7 GPUs

[Jani Nikula]

On Thu, 16 May 2019, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Op 16-05-2019 om 07:58 schreef Harish Chegondi:
>> display_pipe_crc_irq_handler() skips the first CRC for all GPUs and the
>> second CRC for GEN8+ GPUs. The second CRC is invalid even for BYT which
>> is a GEN7 GPU. So, skip the second CRC even for GEN7 GPUs.
>>
>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>
>> Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>
>> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103191
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> index 233211fde0ea..3809e9f7fae2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> @@ -1775,11 +1775,11 @@ static void display_pipe_crc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>  	 * bonkers. So let's just wait for the next vblank and read
>>  	 * out the buggy result.
>>  	 *
>> -	 * On GEN8+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
>> +	 * On GEN7+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
>>  	 * don't trust that one either.
>>  	 */
>>  	if (pipe_crc->skipped <= 0 ||
>> -	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
>> +	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 7 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
>>  		pipe_crc->skipped++;
>>  		spin_unlock(&pipe_crc->lock);
>>  		return;
>
> I would be interested in the results, haswell is different from
> VLV. Has it ever been observed on that platform?

Good point. I looked at [1] which I presumed was on VLV, but it says
nothing about HSW.

BR,
Jani.



[1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103191#c34


>

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: skip the second CRC even for GEN 7 GPUs

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 03:55:25PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2019, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > Op 16-05-2019 om 07:58 schreef Harish Chegondi:
> >> display_pipe_crc_irq_handler() skips the first CRC for all GPUs and the
> >> second CRC for GEN8+ GPUs. The second CRC is invalid even for BYT which
> >> is a GEN7 GPU. So, skip the second CRC even for GEN7 GPUs.
> >>
> >> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>
> >> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103191
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 ++--
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> >> index 233211fde0ea..3809e9f7fae2 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> >> @@ -1775,11 +1775,11 @@ static void display_pipe_crc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >>  	 * bonkers. So let's just wait for the next vblank and read
> >>  	 * out the buggy result.
> >>  	 *
> >> -	 * On GEN8+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
> >> +	 * On GEN7+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
> >>  	 * don't trust that one either.
> >>  	 */
> >>  	if (pipe_crc->skipped <= 0 ||
> >> -	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
> >> +	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 7 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
> >>  		pipe_crc->skipped++;
> >>  		spin_unlock(&pipe_crc->lock);
> >>  		return;
> >
> > I would be interested in the results, haswell is different from
> > VLV. Has it ever been observed on that platform?
> 
> Good point. I looked at [1] which I presumed was on VLV, but it says
> nothing about HSW.

This whole thing is just a pile of duct tape anyway. The reason(s)
for these funky crcs has never been properly analysed.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: skip the second CRC even for GEN 7 GPUs

[Jani Nikula]

On Thu, 16 May 2019, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 03:55:25PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 May 2019, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > Op 16-05-2019 om 07:58 schreef Harish Chegondi:
>> >> display_pipe_crc_irq_handler() skips the first CRC for all GPUs and the
>> >> second CRC for GEN8+ GPUs. The second CRC is invalid even for BYT which
>> >> is a GEN7 GPU. So, skip the second CRC even for GEN7 GPUs.
>> >>
>> >> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> >> Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>
>> >> Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
>> >> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> >> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>
>> >> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103191
>> >> ---
>> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 ++--
>> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> >> index 233211fde0ea..3809e9f7fae2 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> >> @@ -1775,11 +1775,11 @@ static void display_pipe_crc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> >>  	 * bonkers. So let's just wait for the next vblank and read
>> >>  	 * out the buggy result.
>> >>  	 *
>> >> -	 * On GEN8+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
>> >> +	 * On GEN7+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
>> >>  	 * don't trust that one either.
>> >>  	 */
>> >>  	if (pipe_crc->skipped <= 0 ||
>> >> -	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
>> >> +	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 7 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
>> >>  		pipe_crc->skipped++;
>> >>  		spin_unlock(&pipe_crc->lock);
>> >>  		return;
>> >
>> > I would be interested in the results, haswell is different from
>> > VLV. Has it ever been observed on that platform?
>> 
>> Good point. I looked at [1] which I presumed was on VLV, but it says
>> nothing about HSW.
>
> This whole thing is just a pile of duct tape anyway. The reason(s)
> for these funky crcs has never been properly analysed.

I don't disagree. And this is partially why I was so eager to ack the
patch at hand. Another strip of duct tape does no harm when you already
have so much, and we can't hold this particular issue hostage to root
cause the issues.

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: skip the second CRC even for GEN 7 GPUs

[Chegondi, Harish]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2615 bytes --]

On Thu, 2019-05-16 at 16:30 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 03:55:25PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 May 2019, Maarten Lankhorst <
> > maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > Op 16-05-2019 om 07:58 schreef Harish Chegondi:
> > > > display_pipe_crc_irq_handler() skips the first CRC for all GPUs
> > > > and the
> > > > second CRC for GEN8+ GPUs. The second CRC is invalid even for
> > > > BYT which
> > > > is a GEN7 GPU. So, skip the second CRC even for GEN7 GPUs.
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>
> > > > References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103191
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 ++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > > > index 233211fde0ea..3809e9f7fae2 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > > > @@ -1775,11 +1775,11 @@ static void
> > > > display_pipe_crc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > >  	 * bonkers. So let's just wait for the next vblank and
> > > > read
> > > >  	 * out the buggy result.
> > > >  	 *
> > > > -	 * On GEN8+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as
> > > > well, so
> > > > +	 * On GEN7+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as
> > > > well, so
> > > >  	 * don't trust that one either.
> > > >  	 */
> > > >  	if (pipe_crc->skipped <= 0 ||
> > > > -	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8 && pipe_crc->skipped ==
> > > > 1)) {
> > > > +	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 7 && pipe_crc->skipped ==
> > > > 1)) {
> > > >  		pipe_crc->skipped++;
> > > >  		spin_unlock(&pipe_crc->lock);
> > > >  		return;
> > > 
> > > I would be interested in the results, haswell is different from
> > > VLV. Has it ever been observed on that platform?
> > 
> > Good point. I looked at [1] which I presumed was on VLV, but it
> > says
> > nothing about HSW.
> 
> This whole thing is just a pile of duct tape anyway. The reason(s)
> for these funky crcs has never been properly analysed.

Ville,
Are the patches in your branch :
git://github.com/vsyrjala/linux.git g4x_fixes_4
related to fixing these invalid CRCs ?

Thanks!
Harish

[-- Attachment #1.2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3274 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: skip the second CRC even for GEN 7 GPUs

[Chegondi, Harish]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2938 bytes --]

On Thu, 2019-05-16 at 15:55 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2019, Maarten Lankhorst <
> maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > Op 16-05-2019 om 07:58 schreef Harish Chegondi:
> > > display_pipe_crc_irq_handler() skips the first CRC for all GPUs
> > > and the
> > > second CRC for GEN8+ GPUs. The second CRC is invalid even for BYT
> > > which
> > > is a GEN7 GPU. So, skip the second CRC even for GEN7 GPUs.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>
> > > References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103191
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 ++--
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > > index 233211fde0ea..3809e9f7fae2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > > @@ -1775,11 +1775,11 @@ static void
> > > display_pipe_crc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > >  	 * bonkers. So let's just wait for the next vblank and read
> > >  	 * out the buggy result.
> > >  	 *
> > > -	 * On GEN8+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
> > > +	 * On GEN7+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
> > >  	 * don't trust that one either.
> > >  	 */
> > >  	if (pipe_crc->skipped <= 0 ||
> > > -	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
> > > +	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 7 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
> > >  		pipe_crc->skipped++;
> > >  		spin_unlock(&pipe_crc->lock);
> > >  		return;
> > 
> > I would be interested in the results, haswell is different from
> > VLV. Has it ever been observed on that platform?
> 
> Good point. I looked at [1] which I presumed was on VLV, but it says
> nothing about HSW.

In fdo # 103191, CRC mismatch failures in igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@*
tests have not been observed on HSW. These tests have been very
consistently failing on CI fi-byt-squawks system which is a chromebook,
sporadically failing on CI fi-byt-clapper system which is also a
chromebook. However the tests are passing on other CI BYT systems like
fi-byt-n2820 and fi-byt-j1900 which are not chromebooks and the display
is not eDP. I haven't seen these failures happening on other GEN7 GPUs.
Instead of skipping the second CRC just for BYT, I thought it may be a
better idea to skip the second CRC on all GEN7 GPUs as the current code
is already skipping the second CRC on all GEN8+ GPUs.

Thanks!
Harish.

> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
> 
> [1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103191#c34
> 
> 

[-- Attachment #1.2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3274 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH v2 0/1] Invalid CRCs causing CRC mismatch test failures

[Harish Chegondi]

Hello,

The first version of this patch has been "Acked-by" but wasn't "Reviewed-by" as the patch adds another workaround on top of an already existing workaround. The patch doesn't fix the cause of invalid CRCs being generated which still needs to be investigated and fixed. I am rebasing and resending the patch to seek feedback on how to move further with this patch.

Thank You
Harish Chegondi (1):
  drm/i915: skip the second CRC even for GEN 7 GPUs

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
2.21.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH v2 1/1] drm/i915: skip the second CRC even for GEN 7 GPUs

[Harish Chegondi]

display_pipe_crc_irq_handler() skips the first CRC for all GPUs and the
second CRC for GEN8+ GPUs. The second CRC is invalid even for BYT which
is a GEN7 GPU. So, skip the second CRC even for GEN7 GPUs.

v2: Rebase

Cc: Jani Saarinen <jani.saarinen@intel.com>
Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>
Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103191
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 572a5c37cc61..312ca9d5292a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -1565,11 +1565,11 @@ static void display_pipe_crc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	 * bonkers. So let's just wait for the next vblank and read
 	 * out the buggy result.
 	 *
-	 * On GEN8+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
+	 * On GEN7+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
 	 * don't trust that one either.
 	 */
 	if (pipe_crc->skipped <= 0 ||
-	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
+	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 7 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
 		pipe_crc->skipped++;
 		spin_unlock(&pipe_crc->lock);
 		return;
-- 
2.21.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] drm/i915: skip the second CRC even for GEN 7 GPUs

[Chegondi, Harish]

Hi,

Even though I tried to link this patch with it's first version by
specifying --in-reply-to=<message-id>, it wasn't successful. So here is
the link to the first version of the patch and the discussion.

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/305153/?series=60697&rev=1

The first version of this patch has been "Acked-by" but wasn't
"Reviewed-by" as the patch adds another workaround on top of an already
existing workaround. The patch doesn't fix the cause of invalid CRCs
being generated which still needs to be investigated and fixed. I am
rebasing and resending the patch to seek feedback on how to move
further with this patch.

Thank You
Harish

On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 00:24 -0700, Harish Chegondi wrote:
> display_pipe_crc_irq_handler() skips the first CRC for all GPUs and
> the
> second CRC for GEN8+ GPUs. The second CRC is invalid even for BYT
> which
> is a GEN7 GPU. So, skip the second CRC even for GEN7 GPUs.
> 
> v2: Rebase
> 
> Cc: Jani Saarinen <jani.saarinen@intel.com>
> Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>
> Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>
> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103191
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index 572a5c37cc61..312ca9d5292a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -1565,11 +1565,11 @@ static void
> display_pipe_crc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	 * bonkers. So let's just wait for the next vblank and read
>  	 * out the buggy result.
>  	 *
> -	 * On GEN8+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
> +	 * On GEN7+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
>  	 * don't trust that one either.
>  	 */
>  	if (pipe_crc->skipped <= 0 ||
> -	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
> +	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 7 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
>  		pipe_crc->skipped++;
>  		spin_unlock(&pipe_crc->lock);
>  		return;
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/1] drm/i915: skip the second CRC even for GEN 7 GPUs

[Chegondi, Harish]

Hi,

Even though I tried to link this patch with it's first version by
specifying --in-reply-to=<message-id>, it wasn't successful. So here is
the link to the first version of the patch and the discussion.

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/305153/?series=60697&rev=1

The first version of this patch has been "Acked-by" but wasn't
"Reviewed-by" as the patch adds another workaround on top of an already
existing workaround. The patch doesn't fix the cause of invalid CRCs
being generated which still needs to be investigated and fixed. I am
rebasing and resending the patch to seek feedback on how to move
further with this patch.

Thank You
Harish

On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 00:24 -0700, Harish Chegondi wrote:
> display_pipe_crc_irq_handler() skips the first CRC for all GPUs and
> the
> second CRC for GEN8+ GPUs. The second CRC is invalid even for BYT
> which
> is a GEN7 GPU. So, skip the second CRC even for GEN7 GPUs.
> 
> v2: Rebase
> 
> Cc: Jani Saarinen <jani.saarinen@intel.com>
> Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>
> Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>
> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103191
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index 572a5c37cc61..312ca9d5292a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -1565,11 +1565,11 @@ static void
> display_pipe_crc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	 * bonkers. So let's just wait for the next vblank and read
>  	 * out the buggy result.
>  	 *
> -	 * On GEN8+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
> +	 * On GEN7+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
>  	 * don't trust that one either.
>  	 */
>  	if (pipe_crc->skipped <= 0 ||
> -	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
> +	    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 7 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
>  		pipe_crc->skipped++;
>  		spin_unlock(&pipe_crc->lock);
>  		return;
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/1] drm/i915: skip the second CRC even for GEN 7 GPUs

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: series starting with [v2,1/1] drm/i915: skip the second CRC even for GEN 7 GPUs
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/68427/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7155 -> Patchwork_14938
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14938/index.html

Possible new issues
-------------------

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_14938:

### IGT changes ###

#### Suppressed ####

  The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
  They do not affect the overall result.

  * {igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_heartbeat}:
    - fi-whl-u:           [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-FAIL][2]
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7155/fi-whl-u/igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_heartbeat.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14938/fi-whl-u/igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_heartbeat.html

  
Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_14938 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-cpu-read-noreloc:
    - fi-icl-u3:          [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4] ([fdo#107724]) +1 similar issue
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7155/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-cpu-read-noreloc.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14938/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-cpu-read-noreloc.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-pci-d3-state:
    - fi-hsw-4770:        [PASS][5] -> [SKIP][6] ([fdo#109271]) +1 similar issue
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7155/fi-hsw-4770/igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-pci-d3-state.html
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14938/fi-hsw-4770/igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-pci-d3-state.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@gem_sync@basic-many-each:
    - {fi-tgl-u}:         [INCOMPLETE][7] ([fdo#111880]) -> [PASS][8]
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7155/fi-tgl-u/igt@gem_sync@basic-many-each.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14938/fi-tgl-u/igt@gem_sync@basic-many-each.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live_requests:
    - {fi-tgl-u2}:        [INCOMPLETE][9] ([fdo#112057]) -> [PASS][10]
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7155/fi-tgl-u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14938/fi-tgl-u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html

  * igt@vgem_basic@setversion:
    - fi-icl-u3:          [DMESG-WARN][11] ([fdo#107724]) -> [PASS][12]
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7155/fi-icl-u3/igt@vgem_basic@setversion.html
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14938/fi-icl-u3/igt@vgem_basic@setversion.html

  
#### Warnings ####

  * igt@i915_selftest@live_gem:
    - fi-snb-2600:        [INCOMPLETE][13] ([fdo#105411]) -> [INCOMPLETE][14] ([fdo#105411] / [fdo#112107])
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7155/fi-snb-2600/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem.html
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14938/fi-snb-2600/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem.html
    - fi-byt-j1900:       [INCOMPLETE][15] ([fdo#102657]) -> [INCOMPLETE][16] ([fdo#102657] / [fdo#112107])
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7155/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem.html
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14938/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem.html
    - fi-cml-u2:          [INCOMPLETE][17] ([fdo#110566]) -> [INCOMPLETE][18] ([fdo#110566] / [fdo#112107])
   [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7155/fi-cml-u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem.html
   [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14938/fi-cml-u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem.html
    - fi-icl-u3:          [INCOMPLETE][19] ([fdo#107713]) -> [INCOMPLETE][20] ([fdo#107713] / [fdo#112107])
   [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7155/fi-icl-u3/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem.html
   [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14938/fi-icl-u3/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem.html
    - fi-gdg-551:         [INCOMPLETE][21] ([fdo#108316]) -> [INCOMPLETE][22] ([fdo#108316] / [fdo#112107])
   [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7155/fi-gdg-551/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem.html
   [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14938/fi-gdg-551/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem.html
    - fi-glk-dsi:         [INCOMPLETE][23] ([fdo#103359] / [k.org#198133]) -> [INCOMPLETE][24] ([fdo#103359] / [fdo#112107] / [k.org#198133])
   [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7155/fi-glk-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem.html
   [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14938/fi-glk-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem.html
    - fi-icl-u2:          [INCOMPLETE][25] ([fdo#107713]) -> [INCOMPLETE][26] ([fdo#107713] / [fdo#112107])
   [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7155/fi-icl-u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem.html
   [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14938/fi-icl-u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem.html
    - fi-byt-n2820:       [INCOMPLETE][27] ([fdo#102657]) -> [INCOMPLETE][28] ([fdo#102657] / [fdo#112107])
   [27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7155/fi-byt-n2820/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem.html
   [28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14938/fi-byt-n2820/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
          the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [fdo#102657]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102657
  [fdo#103359]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103359
  [fdo#105411]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105411
  [fdo#107713]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107713
  [fdo#107724]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107724
  [fdo#108316]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108316
  [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
  [fdo#110566]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110566
  [fdo#111880]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111880
  [fdo#112057]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112057
  [fdo#112096]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112096
  [fdo#112107]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112107
  [k.org#198133]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198133


Participating hosts (52 -> 33)
------------------------------

  Missing    (19): fi-icl-u4 fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-hsw-peppy fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-bwr-2160 fi-apl-guc fi-snb-2520m fi-cfl-guc fi-byt-clapper fi-elk-e7500 fi-skl-iommu fi-pnv-d510 fi-icl-y fi-bdw-samus fi-bsw-kefka fi-skl-6700k2 fi-cml-u 


Build changes
-------------

  * CI: CI-20190529 -> None
  * Linux: CI_DRM_7155 -> Patchwork_14938

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_7155: 87aff128f9bafd90854e4691c3afcdf7a0e61ce2 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_5235: da9abbab69be80dd00812a4607a4ea2dffcc4544 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_14938: 964997fd484dbc1314b6f4abb13a8174d733d130 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


== Linux commits ==

964997fd484d drm/i915: skip the second CRC even for GEN 7 GPUs

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14938/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Reg: igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@* CRC mismatch test failures

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: Reg: igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@* CRC mismatch test failures
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/60697/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_6089 -> Patchwork_13023
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_13023 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
    - fi-blb-e6850:       [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] ([fdo#107718])
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/fi-blb-e6850/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/fi-blb-e6850/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast:
    - fi-kbl-7500u:       [FAIL][3] ([fdo#109485]) -> [PASS][4]
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html

  
#### Warnings ####

  * igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck:
    - fi-apl-guc:         [DMESG-FAIL][5] ([fdo#110620]) -> [INCOMPLETE][6] ([fdo#103927] / [fdo#110624])
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/fi-apl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck.html
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/fi-apl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck.html

  * igt@runner@aborted:
    - fi-apl-guc:         [FAIL][7] ([fdo#110622]) -> [FAIL][8] ([fdo#110624])
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/fi-apl-guc/igt@runner@aborted.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/fi-apl-guc/igt@runner@aborted.html

  
  [fdo#103927]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103927
  [fdo#107718]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107718
  [fdo#109485]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109485
  [fdo#110620]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110620
  [fdo#110622]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110622
  [fdo#110624]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110624


Participating hosts (52 -> 45)
------------------------------

  Missing    (7): fi-kbl-soraka fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-byt-clapper fi-bdw-samus 


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_6089 -> Patchwork_13023

  CI_DRM_6089: c7a46913f77868d15ade90846526d7e4cb910637 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_4991: 61dd8eec659062eac67823ccd9f2189c3aa36201 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_13023: ea7bd1c53ffed5ca2cf77f2a236ff031fcd71ba7 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


== Linux commits ==

ea7bd1c53ffe drm/i915: skip the second CRC even for GEN 7 GPUs

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for Reg: igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@* CRC mismatch test failures

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: Reg: igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@* CRC mismatch test failures
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/60697/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_6089_full -> Patchwork_13023_full
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_13023_full that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded:
    - shard-hsw:          [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] ([fdo#108686])
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/shard-hsw7/igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/shard-hsw4/igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@debugfs-forcewake-user:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4] ([fdo#107807])
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/shard-skl2/igt@i915_pm_rpm@debugfs-forcewake-user.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/shard-skl4/igt@i915_pm_rpm@debugfs-forcewake-user.html

  * igt@i915_suspend@debugfs-reader:
    - shard-apl:          [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-WARN][6] ([fdo#108566]) +2 similar issues
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/shard-apl7/igt@i915_suspend@debugfs-reader.html
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/shard-apl5/igt@i915_suspend@debugfs-reader.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@2x-long-cursor-vs-flip-atomic:
    - shard-hsw:          [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8] ([fdo#105767])
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/shard-hsw7/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@2x-long-cursor-vs-flip-atomic.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/shard-hsw1/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@2x-long-cursor-vs-flip-atomic.html

  * igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][9] -> [FAIL][10] ([fdo#100368])
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/shard-skl4/igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible.html
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/shard-skl1/igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-pwrite:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][11] -> [FAIL][12] ([fdo#103167]) +8 similar issues
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-pwrite.html
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-pwrite.html

  * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][13] -> [FAIL][14] ([fdo#108145] / [fdo#110403])
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/shard-skl2/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc.html
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/shard-skl5/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc.html

  * igt@kms_psr@no_drrs:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][15] -> [FAIL][16] ([fdo#108341])
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/shard-iclb4/igt@kms_psr@no_drrs.html
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/shard-iclb1/igt@kms_psr@no_drrs.html

  * igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_plane_move:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][17] -> [SKIP][18] ([fdo#109441]) +3 similar issues
   [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_plane_move.html
   [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/shard-iclb4/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_plane_move.html

  * igt@perf@oa-exponents:
    - shard-glk:          [PASS][19] -> [FAIL][20] ([fdo#105483])
   [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/shard-glk2/igt@perf@oa-exponents.html
   [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/shard-glk8/igt@perf@oa-exponents.html

  * igt@perf_pmu@rc6:
    - shard-kbl:          [PASS][21] -> [SKIP][22] ([fdo#109271])
   [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/shard-kbl6/igt@perf_pmu@rc6.html
   [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/shard-kbl2/igt@perf_pmu@rc6.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@gem-execbuf:
    - shard-apl:          [INCOMPLETE][23] ([fdo#103927]) -> [PASS][24]
   [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/shard-apl6/igt@i915_pm_rpm@gem-execbuf.html
   [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/shard-apl3/igt@i915_pm_rpm@gem-execbuf.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@sysfs-read:
    - shard-skl:          [INCOMPLETE][25] ([fdo#107807]) -> [PASS][26]
   [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/shard-skl7/igt@i915_pm_rpm@sysfs-read.html
   [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/shard-skl5/igt@i915_pm_rpm@sysfs-read.html

  * {igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-suspend}:
    - shard-apl:          [DMESG-WARN][27] ([fdo#108566]) -> [PASS][28] +1 similar issue
   [27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/shard-apl4/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-suspend.html
   [28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/shard-apl2/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-offscren-pri-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt:
    - shard-iclb:         [FAIL][29] ([fdo#103167]) -> [PASS][30] +5 similar issues
   [29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-offscren-pri-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt.html
   [30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-offscren-pri-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt.html

  * igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-y:
    - shard-iclb:         [FAIL][31] ([fdo#103166]) -> [PASS][32]
   [31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-y.html
   [32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-y.html

  * igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][33] ([fdo#109642]) -> [PASS][34]
   [33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip.html
   [34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip.html

  
#### Warnings ####

  * igt@gem_mmap_gtt@forked-big-copy-odd:
    - shard-iclb:         [INCOMPLETE][35] ([fdo#107713] / [fdo#109100]) -> [TIMEOUT][36] ([fdo#109673])
   [35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@forked-big-copy-odd.html
   [36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@forked-big-copy-odd.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@pc8-residency:
    - shard-skl:          [SKIP][37] ([fdo#109271]) -> [INCOMPLETE][38] ([fdo#107807])
   [37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6089/shard-skl10/igt@i915_pm_rpm@pc8-residency.html
   [38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/shard-skl7/igt@i915_pm_rpm@pc8-residency.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
          the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [fdo#100368]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100368
  [fdo#103166]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103166
  [fdo#103167]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
  [fdo#103927]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103927
  [fdo#105483]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105483
  [fdo#105767]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105767
  [fdo#107713]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107713
  [fdo#107807]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107807
  [fdo#108145]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108145
  [fdo#108341]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108341
  [fdo#108566]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108566
  [fdo#108686]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108686
  [fdo#109100]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109100
  [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
  [fdo#109441]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109441
  [fdo#109642]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109642
  [fdo#109673]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109673
  [fdo#110403]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110403


Participating hosts (10 -> 10)
------------------------------

  No changes in participating hosts


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_6089 -> Patchwork_13023

  CI_DRM_6089: c7a46913f77868d15ade90846526d7e4cb910637 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_4991: 61dd8eec659062eac67823ccd9f2189c3aa36201 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_13023: ea7bd1c53ffed5ca2cf77f2a236ff031fcd71ba7 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  piglit_4509: fdc5a4ca11124ab8413c7988896eec4c97336694 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13023/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx