All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6/8] powerpc/membarrier: Remove special barrier on mm switch
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:21:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d9034f951329830b766feb08099c15b714e08e8f.1623813516.git.luto@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1623813516.git.luto@kernel.org>

powerpc did the following on some, but not all, paths through
switch_mm_irqs_off():

       /*
        * Only need the full barrier when switching between processes.
        * Barrier when switching from kernel to userspace is not
        * required here, given that it is implied by mmdrop(). Barrier
        * when switching from userspace to kernel is not needed after
        * store to rq->curr.
        */
       if (likely(!(atomic_read(&next->membarrier_state) &
                    (MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED |
                     MEMBARRIER_STATE_GLOBAL_EXPEDITED)) || !prev))
               return;

This is puzzling: if !prev, then one might expect that we are switching
from kernel to user, not user to kernel, which is inconsistent with the
comment.  But this is all nonsense, because the one and only caller would
never have prev == NULL and would, in fact, OOPS if prev == NULL.

In any event, this code is unnecessary, since the new generic
membarrier_finish_switch_mm() provides the same barrier without arch help.

Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h | 27 ---------------------------
 arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context.c         |  2 --
 2 files changed, 29 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 6e20bb5c74ea..000000000000
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
-#ifndef _ASM_POWERPC_MEMBARRIER_H
-#define _ASM_POWERPC_MEMBARRIER_H
-
-static inline void membarrier_arch_switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev,
-					     struct mm_struct *next,
-					     struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-	/*
-	 * Only need the full barrier when switching between processes.
-	 * Barrier when switching from kernel to userspace is not
-	 * required here, given that it is implied by mmdrop(). Barrier
-	 * when switching from userspace to kernel is not needed after
-	 * store to rq->curr.
-	 */
-	if (likely(!(atomic_read(&next->membarrier_state) &
-		     (MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED |
-		      MEMBARRIER_STATE_GLOBAL_EXPEDITED)) || !prev))
-		return;
-
-	/*
-	 * The membarrier system call requires a full memory barrier
-	 * after storing to rq->curr, before going back to user-space.
-	 */
-	smp_mb();
-}
-
-#endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_MEMBARRIER_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context.c
index a857af401738..8daa95b3162b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context.c
@@ -85,8 +85,6 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
 
 	if (new_on_cpu)
 		radix_kvm_prefetch_workaround(next);
-	else
-		membarrier_arch_switch_mm(prev, next, tsk);
 
 	/*
 	 * The actual HW switching method differs between the various
-- 
2.31.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/8] powerpc/membarrier: Remove special barrier on mm switch
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:21:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d9034f951329830b766feb08099c15b714e08e8f.1623813516.git.luto@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1623813516.git.luto@kernel.org>

powerpc did the following on some, but not all, paths through
switch_mm_irqs_off():

       /*
        * Only need the full barrier when switching between processes.
        * Barrier when switching from kernel to userspace is not
        * required here, given that it is implied by mmdrop(). Barrier
        * when switching from userspace to kernel is not needed after
        * store to rq->curr.
        */
       if (likely(!(atomic_read(&next->membarrier_state) &
                    (MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED |
                     MEMBARRIER_STATE_GLOBAL_EXPEDITED)) || !prev))
               return;

This is puzzling: if !prev, then one might expect that we are switching
from kernel to user, not user to kernel, which is inconsistent with the
comment.  But this is all nonsense, because the one and only caller would
never have prev == NULL and would, in fact, OOPS if prev == NULL.

In any event, this code is unnecessary, since the new generic
membarrier_finish_switch_mm() provides the same barrier without arch help.

Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h | 27 ---------------------------
 arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context.c         |  2 --
 2 files changed, 29 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 6e20bb5c74ea..000000000000
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
-#ifndef _ASM_POWERPC_MEMBARRIER_H
-#define _ASM_POWERPC_MEMBARRIER_H
-
-static inline void membarrier_arch_switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev,
-					     struct mm_struct *next,
-					     struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-	/*
-	 * Only need the full barrier when switching between processes.
-	 * Barrier when switching from kernel to userspace is not
-	 * required here, given that it is implied by mmdrop(). Barrier
-	 * when switching from userspace to kernel is not needed after
-	 * store to rq->curr.
-	 */
-	if (likely(!(atomic_read(&next->membarrier_state) &
-		     (MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED |
-		      MEMBARRIER_STATE_GLOBAL_EXPEDITED)) || !prev))
-		return;
-
-	/*
-	 * The membarrier system call requires a full memory barrier
-	 * after storing to rq->curr, before going back to user-space.
-	 */
-	smp_mb();
-}
-
-#endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_MEMBARRIER_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context.c
index a857af401738..8daa95b3162b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context.c
@@ -85,8 +85,6 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
 
 	if (new_on_cpu)
 		radix_kvm_prefetch_workaround(next);
-	else
-		membarrier_arch_switch_mm(prev, next, tsk);
 
 	/*
 	 * The actual HW switching method differs between the various
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-16  3:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 165+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-16  3:21 [PATCH 0/8] membarrier cleanups Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16  3:21 ` [PATCH 1/8] membarrier: Document why membarrier() works Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16  4:00   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-16  7:30     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-17 23:45       ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16  3:21 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86/mm: Handle unlazying membarrier core sync in the arch code Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16  4:25   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-16 18:31     ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16 17:49   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-16 17:49     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-16 18:31     ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16  3:21 ` [PATCH 3/8] membarrier: Remove membarrier_arch_switch_mm() prototype in core code Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16  4:26   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-16 17:52   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-16 17:52     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-16  3:21 ` [PATCH 4/8] membarrier: Make the post-switch-mm barrier explicit Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16  4:19   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-16  7:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-16 18:41       ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-17  1:37         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-17  2:57           ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-17  5:32             ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-17  6:51               ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-17 23:49                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-19  2:53                   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-19  3:20                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-19  4:27                       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-17  9:08               ` [RFC][PATCH] sched: Use lightweight hazard pointers to grab lazy mms Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-17  9:10                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-17 10:00                   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-17  9:13                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-17 14:06                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-17  9:28                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-17 14:03                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-17 14:10                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-17 15:45                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-18  3:29                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-06-18  5:04                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-17 15:02               ` [PATCH 4/8] membarrier: Make the post-switch-mm barrier explicit Paul E. McKenney
2021-06-18  0:06                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-18  3:35                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-06-17  8:45         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-16  3:21 ` [PATCH 5/8] membarrier, kthread: Use _ONCE accessors for task->mm Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16  4:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-16 18:08   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-16 18:08     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-16 18:45     ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16  3:21 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2021-06-16  3:21   ` [PATCH 6/8] powerpc/membarrier: Remove special barrier on mm switch Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16  4:36   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-16  4:36     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-16  3:21 ` [PATCH 7/8] membarrier: Remove arm (32) support for SYNC_CORE Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16  3:21   ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16  9:28   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-06-16  9:28     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-06-16 10:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-16 10:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-16 10:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-16 10:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-16 10:34       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-06-16 10:34         ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-06-16 11:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-16 11:10           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-16 13:22           ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-06-16 13:22             ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-06-16 15:04             ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-16 15:04               ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-16 15:23               ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-06-16 15:23                 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-06-16 15:45                 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-16 15:45                   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-16 16:00                   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-16 16:00                     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-16 16:27                     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-06-16 16:27                       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-06-17  8:55                       ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2021-06-17  8:55                         ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2021-06-17  8:55                         ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2021-06-18 12:54                       ` Linus Walleij
2021-06-18 12:54                         ` Linus Walleij
2021-06-18 12:54                         ` Linus Walleij
2021-06-18 13:19                         ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-06-18 13:19                           ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-06-18 13:36                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-18 13:36                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-18 13:36                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-17 10:40   ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-17 10:40     ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-17 11:23     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-06-17 11:23       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-06-17 11:33       ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-17 11:33         ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-17 13:41         ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-17 13:41           ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-17 13:51           ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-17 13:51             ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-17 14:00             ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-17 14:00               ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-17 14:20               ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-17 14:20                 ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-17 15:01               ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-17 15:01                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-17 15:13                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-17 15:13                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-17 14:16             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-17 14:16               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-17 14:05           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-17 14:05             ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-18  0:07   ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-18  0:07     ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16  3:21 ` [PATCH 8/8] membarrier: Rewrite sync_core_before_usermode() and improve documentation Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16  3:21   ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16  3:21   ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16  4:45   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-16  4:45     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-16  4:45     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-16 18:52     ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16 18:52       ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16 18:52       ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16 23:48       ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16 23:48         ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16 23:48         ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-18 15:27       ` Christophe Leroy
2021-06-18 15:27         ` Christophe Leroy
2021-06-18 15:27         ` Christophe Leroy
2021-06-16 10:20   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-16 10:20     ` Will Deacon
2021-06-16 10:20     ` Will Deacon
2021-06-16 23:58     ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16 23:58       ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-16 23:58       ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-17 14:47   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-17 14:47     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-17 14:47     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-17 14:47     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-18  0:12     ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-18  0:12       ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-18  0:12       ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-18 16:31       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-18 16:31         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-18 16:31         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-18 16:31         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-18 19:58         ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-18 19:58           ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-18 19:58           ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-18 20:09           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-18 20:09             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-18 20:09             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-18 20:09             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-19  6:02             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-19  6:02               ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-19  6:02               ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-19 15:50               ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-19 15:50                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-19 15:50                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-20  2:10                 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-20  2:10                   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-20  2:10                   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-17 15:16   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-17 15:16     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-17 15:16     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-17 15:16     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2021-06-18  0:13     ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-18  0:13       ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-18  0:13       ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d9034f951329830b766feb08099c15b714e08e8f.1623813516.git.luto@kernel.org \
    --to=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.