All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: si-wei liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>,
	Siwei Liu <loseweigh@gmail.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	virtio-dev <virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>,
	"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@wp.pl>, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	liran.alon@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Re: net_failover slave udev renaming (was Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v6 4/4] netvsc: refactor notifier/event handling code to use the bypass framework)
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 16:58:07 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6a53bd1-83ab-f170-406a-03276e8c87e2@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190222100753-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6340 bytes --]



On 2/22/2019 7:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:55:11PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
>>
>> On 2/21/2019 11:00 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/21/2019 7:33 PM, si-wei liu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2/21/2019 5:39 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 05:14:44PM -0800, Siwei Liu wrote:
>>>>>> Sorry for replying to this ancient thread. There was some remaining
>>>>>> issue that I don't think the initial net_failover patch got addressed
>>>>>> cleanly, see:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1815268
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The renaming of 'eth0' to 'ens4' fails because the udev userspace was
>>>>>> not specifically writtten for such kernel automatic enslavement.
>>>>>> Specifically, if it is a bond or team, the slave would typically get
>>>>>> renamed *before* virtual device gets created, that's what udev can
>>>>>> control (without getting netdev opened early by the other part of
>>>>>> kernel) and other userspace components for e.g. initramfs,
>>>>>> init-scripts can coordinate well in between. The in-kernel
>>>>>> auto-enslavement of net_failover breaks this userspace convention,
>>>>>> which don't provides a solution if user care about consistent naming
>>>>>> on the slave netdevs specifically.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Previously this issue had been specifically called out when IFF_HIDDEN
>>>>>> and the 1-netdev was proposed, but no one gives out a solution to this
>>>>>> problem ever since. Please share your mind how to proceed and solve
>>>>>> this userspace issue if netdev does not welcome a 1-netdev model.
>>>>> Above says:
>>>>>
>>>>>      there's no motivation in the systemd/udevd community at
>>>>>      this point to refactor the rename logic and make it work well with
>>>>>      3-netdev.
>>>>>
>>>>> What would the fix be? Skip slave devices?
>>>>>
>>>> There's nothing user can get if just skipping slave devices - the
>>>> name is still unchanged and unpredictable e.g. eth0, or eth1 the
>>>> next reboot, while the rest may conform to the naming scheme (ens3
>>>> and such). There's no way one can fix this in userspace alone - when
>>>> the failover is created the enslaved netdev was opened by the kernel
>>>> earlier than the userspace is made aware of, and there's no
>>>> negotiation protocol for kernel to know when userspace has done
>>>> initial renaming of the interface. I would expect netdev list should
>>>> at least provide the direction in general for how this can be
>>>> solved...
>
> I was just wondering what did you mean when you said
> "refactor the rename logic and make it work well with 3-netdev" -
> was there a proposal udev rejected?
No. I never believed this particular issue can be fixed in userspace 
alone. Previously someone had said it could be, but I never see any work 
or relevant discussion ever happened in various userspace communities 
(for e.g. dracut, initramfs-tools, systemd, udev, and NetworkManager). 
IMHO the root of the issue derives from the kernel, it makes more sense 
to start from netdev, work out and decide on a solution: see what can be 
done in the kernel in order to fix it, then after that engage userspace 
community for the feasibility...

> Anyway, can we write a time diagram for what happens in which order that
> leads to failure?  That would help look for triggers that we can tie
> into, or add new ones.
>

See attached diagram.

>
>
>
>
>>> Is there an issue if slave device names are not predictable? The user/admin scripts are expected
>>> to only work with the master failover device.
>> Where does this expectation come from?
>>
>> Admin users may have ethtool or tc configurations that need to deal with
>> predictable interface name. Third-party app which was built upon specifying
>> certain interface name can't be modified to chase dynamic names.
>>
>> Specifically, we have pre-canned image that uses ethtool to fine tune VF
>> offload settings post boot for specific workload. Those images won't work
>> well if the name is constantly changing just after couple rounds of live
>> migration.
> It should be possible to specify the ethtool configuration on the
> master and have it automatically propagated to the slave.
>
> BTW this is something we should look at IMHO.
I was elaborating a few examples that the expectation and assumption 
that user/admin scripts only deal with master failover device is 
incorrect. It had never been taken good care of, although I did try to 
emphasize it from the very beginning.

Basically what you said about propagating the ethtool configuration down 
to the slave is the key pursuance of 1-netdev model. However, what I am 
seeking now is any alternative that can also fix the specific udev 
rename problem, before concluding that 1-netdev is the only solution. 
Generally a 1-netdev scheme would take time to implement, while I'm 
trying to find a way out to fix this particular naming problem under 
3-netdev.

>
>>> Moreover, you were suggesting hiding the lower slave devices anyway. There was some discussion
>>> about moving them to a hidden network namespace so that they are not visible from the default namespace.
>>> I looked into this sometime back, but did not find the right kernel api to create a network namespace within
>>> kernel. If so, we could use this mechanism to simulate a 1-netdev model.
>> Yes, that's one possible implementation (IMHO the key is to make 1-netdev
>> model as much transparent to a real NIC as possible, while a hidden netns is
>> just the vehicle). However, I recall there was resistance around this
>> discussion that even the concept of hiding itself is a taboo for Linux
>> netdev. I would like to summon potential alternatives before concluding
>> 1-netdev is the only solution too soon.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Siwei
> Your scripts would not work at all then, right?
At this point we don't claim images with such usage as SR-IOV live 
migrate-able. We would flag it as live migrate-able until this ethtool 
config issue is fully addressed and a transparent live migration 
solution emerges in upstream eventually.


Thanks,
-Siwei
>
>
>>>> -Siwei
>>>>
>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>


[-- Attachment #2: net_failover_rename_race.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3587 bytes --]


  net_failover(kernel)                            |    network.service (user)    |          systemd-udevd (user)
--------------------------------------------------+------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
(standby virtio-net and net_failover              |                              |
devices created and initialized,                  |                              |
i.e. virtnet_probe()->                            |                              |
       net_failover_create()                      |                              |
was done.)                                        |                              |
                                                  |                              |
                                                  |  runs `ifup ens3' ->         |
                                                  |    ip link set dev ens3 up   |
net_failover_open()                               |                              |
  dev_open(virtnet_dev)                           |                              |
    virtnet_open(virtnet_dev)                     |                              |
  netif_carrier_on(failover_dev)                  |                              |
  ...                                             |                              |
                                                  |                              |
(VF hot plugged in)                               |                              |
ixgbevf_probe()                                   |                              |
 register_netdev(ixgbevf_netdev)                  |                              |
  netdev_register_kobject(ixgbevf_netdev)         |                              |
   kobject_add(ixgbevf_dev)                       |                              |
    device_add(ixgbevf_dev)                       |                              |
     kobject_uevent(&ixgbevf_dev->kobj, KOBJ_ADD) |                              |
      netlink_broadcast()                         |                              |
  ...                                             |                              |
  call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_REGISTER)       |                              |
   failover_event(..., NETDEV_REGISTER, ...)      |                              |
    failover_slave_register(ixgbevf_netdev)       |                              |
     net_failover_slave_register(ixgbevf_netdev)  |                              |
      dev_open(ixgbevf_netdev)                    |                              |
                                                  |                              |
                                                  |                              |
                                                  |                              |   received ADD uevent from netlink fd
                                                  |                              |   ...
                                                  |                              |   udev-builtin-net_id.c:dev_pci_slot()
                                                  |                              |   (decided to renamed 'eth0' )
                                                  |                              |     ip link set dev eth0 name ens4
(dev_change_name() returns -EBUSY as              |                              |
ixgbevf_netdev->flags has IFF_UP)                 |                              |
                                                  |                              |


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: si-wei liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>,
	Siwei Liu <loseweigh@gmail.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	virtio-dev <virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>,
	"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@wp.pl>, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	liran.alon@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Re: net_failover slave udev renaming (was Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v6 4/4] netvsc: refactor notifier/event handling code to use the bypass framework)
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 16:58:07 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6a53bd1-83ab-f170-406a-03276e8c87e2@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190222100753-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6340 bytes --]



On 2/22/2019 7:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:55:11PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
>>
>> On 2/21/2019 11:00 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/21/2019 7:33 PM, si-wei liu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2/21/2019 5:39 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 05:14:44PM -0800, Siwei Liu wrote:
>>>>>> Sorry for replying to this ancient thread. There was some remaining
>>>>>> issue that I don't think the initial net_failover patch got addressed
>>>>>> cleanly, see:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1815268
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The renaming of 'eth0' to 'ens4' fails because the udev userspace was
>>>>>> not specifically writtten for such kernel automatic enslavement.
>>>>>> Specifically, if it is a bond or team, the slave would typically get
>>>>>> renamed *before* virtual device gets created, that's what udev can
>>>>>> control (without getting netdev opened early by the other part of
>>>>>> kernel) and other userspace components for e.g. initramfs,
>>>>>> init-scripts can coordinate well in between. The in-kernel
>>>>>> auto-enslavement of net_failover breaks this userspace convention,
>>>>>> which don't provides a solution if user care about consistent naming
>>>>>> on the slave netdevs specifically.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Previously this issue had been specifically called out when IFF_HIDDEN
>>>>>> and the 1-netdev was proposed, but no one gives out a solution to this
>>>>>> problem ever since. Please share your mind how to proceed and solve
>>>>>> this userspace issue if netdev does not welcome a 1-netdev model.
>>>>> Above says:
>>>>>
>>>>>      there's no motivation in the systemd/udevd community at
>>>>>      this point to refactor the rename logic and make it work well with
>>>>>      3-netdev.
>>>>>
>>>>> What would the fix be? Skip slave devices?
>>>>>
>>>> There's nothing user can get if just skipping slave devices - the
>>>> name is still unchanged and unpredictable e.g. eth0, or eth1 the
>>>> next reboot, while the rest may conform to the naming scheme (ens3
>>>> and such). There's no way one can fix this in userspace alone - when
>>>> the failover is created the enslaved netdev was opened by the kernel
>>>> earlier than the userspace is made aware of, and there's no
>>>> negotiation protocol for kernel to know when userspace has done
>>>> initial renaming of the interface. I would expect netdev list should
>>>> at least provide the direction in general for how this can be
>>>> solved...
>
> I was just wondering what did you mean when you said
> "refactor the rename logic and make it work well with 3-netdev" -
> was there a proposal udev rejected?
No. I never believed this particular issue can be fixed in userspace 
alone. Previously someone had said it could be, but I never see any work 
or relevant discussion ever happened in various userspace communities 
(for e.g. dracut, initramfs-tools, systemd, udev, and NetworkManager). 
IMHO the root of the issue derives from the kernel, it makes more sense 
to start from netdev, work out and decide on a solution: see what can be 
done in the kernel in order to fix it, then after that engage userspace 
community for the feasibility...

> Anyway, can we write a time diagram for what happens in which order that
> leads to failure?  That would help look for triggers that we can tie
> into, or add new ones.
>

See attached diagram.

>
>
>
>
>>> Is there an issue if slave device names are not predictable? The user/admin scripts are expected
>>> to only work with the master failover device.
>> Where does this expectation come from?
>>
>> Admin users may have ethtool or tc configurations that need to deal with
>> predictable interface name. Third-party app which was built upon specifying
>> certain interface name can't be modified to chase dynamic names.
>>
>> Specifically, we have pre-canned image that uses ethtool to fine tune VF
>> offload settings post boot for specific workload. Those images won't work
>> well if the name is constantly changing just after couple rounds of live
>> migration.
> It should be possible to specify the ethtool configuration on the
> master and have it automatically propagated to the slave.
>
> BTW this is something we should look at IMHO.
I was elaborating a few examples that the expectation and assumption 
that user/admin scripts only deal with master failover device is 
incorrect. It had never been taken good care of, although I did try to 
emphasize it from the very beginning.

Basically what you said about propagating the ethtool configuration down 
to the slave is the key pursuance of 1-netdev model. However, what I am 
seeking now is any alternative that can also fix the specific udev 
rename problem, before concluding that 1-netdev is the only solution. 
Generally a 1-netdev scheme would take time to implement, while I'm 
trying to find a way out to fix this particular naming problem under 
3-netdev.

>
>>> Moreover, you were suggesting hiding the lower slave devices anyway. There was some discussion
>>> about moving them to a hidden network namespace so that they are not visible from the default namespace.
>>> I looked into this sometime back, but did not find the right kernel api to create a network namespace within
>>> kernel. If so, we could use this mechanism to simulate a 1-netdev model.
>> Yes, that's one possible implementation (IMHO the key is to make 1-netdev
>> model as much transparent to a real NIC as possible, while a hidden netns is
>> just the vehicle). However, I recall there was resistance around this
>> discussion that even the concept of hiding itself is a taboo for Linux
>> netdev. I would like to summon potential alternatives before concluding
>> 1-netdev is the only solution too soon.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Siwei
> Your scripts would not work at all then, right?
At this point we don't claim images with such usage as SR-IOV live 
migrate-able. We would flag it as live migrate-able until this ethtool 
config issue is fully addressed and a transparent live migration 
solution emerges in upstream eventually.


Thanks,
-Siwei
>
>
>>>> -Siwei
>>>>
>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>


[-- Attachment #2: net_failover_rename_race.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3587 bytes --]


  net_failover(kernel)                            |    network.service (user)    |          systemd-udevd (user)
--------------------------------------------------+------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
(standby virtio-net and net_failover              |                              |
devices created and initialized,                  |                              |
i.e. virtnet_probe()->                            |                              |
       net_failover_create()                      |                              |
was done.)                                        |                              |
                                                  |                              |
                                                  |  runs `ifup ens3' ->         |
                                                  |    ip link set dev ens3 up   |
net_failover_open()                               |                              |
  dev_open(virtnet_dev)                           |                              |
    virtnet_open(virtnet_dev)                     |                              |
  netif_carrier_on(failover_dev)                  |                              |
  ...                                             |                              |
                                                  |                              |
(VF hot plugged in)                               |                              |
ixgbevf_probe()                                   |                              |
 register_netdev(ixgbevf_netdev)                  |                              |
  netdev_register_kobject(ixgbevf_netdev)         |                              |
   kobject_add(ixgbevf_dev)                       |                              |
    device_add(ixgbevf_dev)                       |                              |
     kobject_uevent(&ixgbevf_dev->kobj, KOBJ_ADD) |                              |
      netlink_broadcast()                         |                              |
  ...                                             |                              |
  call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_REGISTER)       |                              |
   failover_event(..., NETDEV_REGISTER, ...)      |                              |
    failover_slave_register(ixgbevf_netdev)       |                              |
     net_failover_slave_register(ixgbevf_netdev)  |                              |
      dev_open(ixgbevf_netdev)                    |                              |
                                                  |                              |
                                                  |                              |
                                                  |                              |   received ADD uevent from netlink fd
                                                  |                              |   ...
                                                  |                              |   udev-builtin-net_id.c:dev_pci_slot()
                                                  |                              |   (decided to renamed 'eth0' )
                                                  |                              |     ip link set dev eth0 name ens4
(dev_change_name() returns -EBUSY as              |                              |
ixgbevf_netdev->flags has IFF_UP)                 |                              |
                                                  |                              |


[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 208 bytes --]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-26  0:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 147+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-10 18:59 [RFC PATCH net-next v6 0/4] Enable virtio_net to act as a backup for a passthru device Sridhar Samudrala
2018-04-10 18:59 ` [virtio-dev] " Sridhar Samudrala
2018-04-10 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 1/4] virtio_net: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_BACKUP feature bit Sridhar Samudrala
2018-04-10 18:59   ` [virtio-dev] " Sridhar Samudrala
2018-04-10 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 2/4] net: Introduce generic bypass module Sridhar Samudrala
2018-04-10 18:59   ` [virtio-dev] " Sridhar Samudrala
2018-04-11 15:51   ` Jiri Pirko
2018-04-11 19:13     ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2018-04-11 19:13     ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2018-04-11 19:13       ` [virtio-dev] " Samudrala, Sridhar
2018-04-18  9:25       ` Jiri Pirko
2018-04-18  9:25       ` Jiri Pirko
2018-04-18 18:43         ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2018-04-18 18:43         ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2018-04-18 18:43           ` [virtio-dev] " Samudrala, Sridhar
2018-04-18 19:13           ` Jiri Pirko
2018-04-18 19:13           ` Jiri Pirko
2018-04-18 19:46             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-18 19:46               ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-18 20:32               ` Jiri Pirko
2018-04-18 22:46                 ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2018-04-18 22:46                   ` [virtio-dev] " Samudrala, Sridhar
2018-04-19  6:35                   ` Jiri Pirko
2018-04-19  6:35                   ` Jiri Pirko
2018-04-18 22:46                 ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2018-04-19  4:08                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-19  4:08                   ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-19  7:22                   ` Jiri Pirko
2018-04-19  7:22                   ` Jiri Pirko
2018-04-19  4:08                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-18 20:32               ` Jiri Pirko
2018-04-11 15:51   ` Jiri Pirko
2018-04-10 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available Sridhar Samudrala
2018-04-10 18:59   ` [virtio-dev] " Sridhar Samudrala
2018-04-10 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 4/4] netvsc: refactor notifier/event handling code to use the bypass framework Sridhar Samudrala
2018-04-10 18:59   ` [virtio-dev] " Sridhar Samudrala
2018-04-10 21:26   ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-04-10 22:56     ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2018-04-10 22:56       ` [virtio-dev] " Samudrala, Sridhar
2018-04-10 23:28     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-10 23:28     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-10 23:28       ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-10 23:44       ` Siwei Liu
2018-04-10 23:44         ` [virtio-dev] " Siwei Liu
2018-04-10 23:59         ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-04-10 23:44       ` Siwei Liu
2018-04-11  7:50       ` Jiri Pirko
2018-04-11  7:50       ` Jiri Pirko
2018-04-11  1:21     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-11  1:21     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-11  7:53     ` Jiri Pirko
2018-04-11  7:53     ` Jiri Pirko
2019-02-22  1:14       ` net_failover slave udev renaming (was Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v6 4/4] netvsc: refactor notifier/event handling code to use the bypass framework) Siwei Liu
2019-02-22  1:14         ` [virtio-dev] " Siwei Liu
2019-02-22  1:39         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-22  1:39           ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-22  3:33           ` si-wei liu
2019-02-22  3:33             ` si-wei liu
2019-02-22  7:00             ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2019-02-22  7:55               ` si-wei liu
2019-02-22  7:55                 ` si-wei liu
2019-02-22 12:58                 ` Rob Miller
2019-02-22 12:58                   ` Rob Miller
2019-02-22 15:14                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-22 15:14                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-26  0:58                   ` si-wei liu [this message]
2019-02-26  0:58                     ` si-wei liu
2019-02-26  1:39                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-02-26  1:39                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-02-26  2:05                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-26  2:05                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-26  2:05                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-27  0:49                         ` si-wei liu
2019-02-27  0:49                           ` si-wei liu
2019-02-26  2:08                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-26  2:08                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-26  2:08                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-27  0:17                       ` si-wei liu
2019-02-27  0:17                         ` si-wei liu
2019-02-27 21:57                         ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-02-27 21:57                         ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-02-27 22:30                           ` si-wei liu
2019-02-27 22:30                             ` si-wei liu
2019-02-27 22:38                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-27 22:38                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-27 22:38                           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-27 23:34                           ` si-wei liu
2019-02-27 23:34                             ` si-wei liu
2019-02-27 23:50                             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-27 23:50                             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-27 23:50                               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-28  0:00                               ` Liran Alon
2019-02-28  0:00                               ` Liran Alon
2019-02-28  0:03                               ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-02-28  0:38                                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-28  0:38                                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-28  0:38                                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-28  0:03                               ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-02-28  0:38                               ` si-wei liu
2019-02-28  0:38                                 ` si-wei liu
2019-02-28  0:41                                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-28  0:41                                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-28  0:41                                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-28  0:52                                   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-28  0:52                                   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-28  1:26                                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-28  1:26                                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-28  1:52                                       ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-28  1:52                                       ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-28  4:47                                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-28  4:47                                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-28  4:47                                           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-28 18:13                                           ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-28 19:36                                             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-28 19:36                                             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-28 19:36                                               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-28 19:56                                               ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-28 19:56                                               ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-28 20:14                                                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-28 20:14                                                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-28 23:31                                                   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-28 23:31                                                   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-01  0:20                                                 ` Siwei Liu
2019-03-01  0:20                                                 ` Siwei Liu
2019-03-01  1:05                                                   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-02  0:30                                                     ` Siwei Liu
2019-03-02  0:30                                                     ` Siwei Liu
2019-03-01  1:05                                                   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-28 18:13                                           ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-28  1:26                                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-28  9:32                                   ` si-wei liu
2019-02-28  9:32                                     ` si-wei liu
2019-02-28 14:26                                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-28 14:26                                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-03-01  1:30                                       ` si-wei liu
2019-03-01  1:30                                         ` si-wei liu
2019-03-01 13:27                                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-03-01 13:27                                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-03-01 13:27                                           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-03-01 20:55                                           ` si-wei liu
2019-03-01 20:55                                             ` si-wei liu
2019-02-28 14:26                                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-22 15:14                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-22  7:00             ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2019-02-22  1:39         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-22  1:14       ` Siwei Liu
2018-04-10 21:26   ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 4/4] netvsc: refactor notifier/event handling code to use the bypass framework Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e6a53bd1-83ab-f170-406a-03276e8c87e2@oracle.com \
    --to=si-wei.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kubakici@wp.pl \
    --cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
    --cc=loseweigh@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.