* [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
@ 2003-10-08 13:49 Anton Yurchenko
2003-10-08 14:03 ` nuclearcat
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Anton Yurchenko @ 2003-10-08 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hello,
I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems.
Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC
related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached
to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more
~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and
rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the
same issue? thanks
--
Anton Yurchenko<phila@dg.net.ua>
Digital Generation
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
2003-10-08 13:49 [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2? Anton Yurchenko
@ 2003-10-08 14:03 ` nuclearcat
2003-10-08 14:11 ` Lawrence MacIntyre
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: nuclearcat @ 2003-10-08 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hello Anton,
Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 4:49:30 PM, you wrote:
I am using HTB3 with more than 10 megabits customers, and
amount of classes about 100-200 without any problem.
Only one what i do - i make filter with lowest priority, to not pass
ass unclassified traffic to default class, just to drop it. I think
you just need review your classes, because also if you have any rate
more 468 Kbit, you need change r2q or quantum.
AY> Hello,
AY> I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems.
AY> Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC
AY> related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached
AY> to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more
AY> ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and
AY> rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the
AY> same issue? thanks
--
Best regards,
Denis mailto:admin@ams-sat.com
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
2003-10-08 13:49 [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2? Anton Yurchenko
2003-10-08 14:03 ` nuclearcat
@ 2003-10-08 14:11 ` Lawrence MacIntyre
2003-10-08 16:56 ` Wilfried Weissmann
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Lawrence MacIntyre @ 2003-10-08 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 967 bytes --]
I've used HTB and CBQ to protect MPEG2 traffic streams from UDP traffic
over 100 Mb/s interfaces. I have not yet attempted this with 1000 Mb/s
interfaces, but I hope to get to that this year (it it much more
difficult to measure accurately at this speed).
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 09:49, Anton Yurchenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems.
> Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC
> related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached
> to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more
> ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and
> rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the
> same issue? thanks
--
Lawrence MacIntyre 865.574.8696 lpz@ornl.gov
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
High Performance Information Infrastructure Technology Group
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
2003-10-08 13:49 [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2? Anton Yurchenko
2003-10-08 14:03 ` nuclearcat
2003-10-08 14:11 ` Lawrence MacIntyre
@ 2003-10-08 16:56 ` Wilfried Weissmann
2003-10-09 8:44 ` Anton Yurchenko
2003-10-09 16:45 ` Stef Coene
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wilfried Weissmann @ 2003-10-08 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Anton Yurchenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems.
> Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC
> related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached
> to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more
> ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and
> rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the
> same issue? thanks
>
check your burst and quantum settings. maybe they are too low.
bye,
wilfried
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
2003-10-08 13:49 [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2? Anton Yurchenko
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-10-08 16:56 ` Wilfried Weissmann
@ 2003-10-09 8:44 ` Anton Yurchenko
2003-10-09 16:45 ` Stef Coene
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Anton Yurchenko @ 2003-10-09 8:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com wrote:
>Hello Anton,
>
>Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 4:49:30 PM, you wrote:
>
>I am using HTB3 with more than 10 megabits customers, and
>amount of classes about 100-200 without any problem.
>Only one what i do - i make filter with lowest priority, to not pass
>ass unclassified traffic to default class, just to drop it. I think
>you just need review your classes, because also if you have any rate
>more 468 Kbit, you need change r2q or quantum.
>
>
the problem was observed even when only adding a qdisc, no classes. how
can this be?
>AY> Hello,
>
>AY> I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems.
>AY> Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC
>AY> related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached
>AY> to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more
>AY> ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and
>AY> rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the
>AY> same issue? thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Anton Yurchenko<phila@dg.net.ua>
Digital Generation
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
2003-10-08 13:49 [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2? Anton Yurchenko
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-10-09 8:44 ` Anton Yurchenko
@ 2003-10-09 16:45 ` Stef Coene
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stef Coene @ 2003-10-09 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Thursday 09 October 2003 10:44, Anton Yurchenko wrote:
> nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com wrote:
> >Hello Anton,
> >
> >Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 4:49:30 PM, you wrote:
> >
> >I am using HTB3 with more than 10 megabits customers, and
> >amount of classes about 100-200 without any problem.
> >Only one what i do - i make filter with lowest priority, to not pass
> >ass unclassified traffic to default class, just to drop it. I think
> >you just need review your classes, because also if you have any rate
> >more 468 Kbit, you need change r2q or quantum.
>
> the problem was observed even when only adding a qdisc, no classes. how
> can this be?
What's the output of
tc -s -d qdisc show dev eth0
tc -s -d class show dev eth0
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-09 16:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-08 13:49 [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2? Anton Yurchenko
2003-10-08 14:03 ` nuclearcat
2003-10-08 14:11 ` Lawrence MacIntyre
2003-10-08 16:56 ` Wilfried Weissmann
2003-10-09 8:44 ` Anton Yurchenko
2003-10-09 16:45 ` Stef Coene
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.