All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
@ 2003-10-08 13:49 Anton Yurchenko
  2003-10-08 14:03 ` nuclearcat
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Anton Yurchenko @ 2003-10-08 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

Hello,

I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems. 
Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC 
related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached 
to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more 
~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and 
rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the 
same issue? thanks

-- 

Anton Yurchenko<phila@dg.net.ua>
Digital Generation


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
  2003-10-08 13:49 [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2? Anton Yurchenko
@ 2003-10-08 14:03 ` nuclearcat
  2003-10-08 14:11 ` Lawrence MacIntyre
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: nuclearcat @ 2003-10-08 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

Hello Anton,

Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 4:49:30 PM, you wrote:

I am using HTB3 with more than 10 megabits customers, and
amount of classes about 100-200 without any problem.
Only one what i do - i make filter with lowest priority, to not pass
ass unclassified traffic to default class, just to drop it. I think
you just need review your classes, because also if you have any rate
more 468 Kbit, you need change r2q or quantum.

AY> Hello,

AY> I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems. 
AY> Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC 
AY> related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached 
AY> to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more 
AY> ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and 
AY> rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the 
AY> same issue? thanks




-- 
Best regards,
 Denis                            mailto:admin@ams-sat.com

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
  2003-10-08 13:49 [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2? Anton Yurchenko
  2003-10-08 14:03 ` nuclearcat
@ 2003-10-08 14:11 ` Lawrence MacIntyre
  2003-10-08 16:56 ` Wilfried Weissmann
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Lawrence MacIntyre @ 2003-10-08 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 967 bytes --]

I've used HTB and CBQ to protect MPEG2 traffic streams from UDP traffic
over 100 Mb/s interfaces.  I have not yet attempted this with 1000 Mb/s
interfaces, but I hope to get to that this year (it it much more
difficult to measure accurately at this speed).

On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 09:49, Anton Yurchenko wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems. 
> Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC 
> related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached 
> to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more 
> ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and 
> rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the 
> same issue? thanks
-- 
    Lawrence MacIntyre     865.574.8696     lpz@ornl.gov
               Oak Ridge National Laboratory
High Performance Information Infrastructure Technology Group


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
  2003-10-08 13:49 [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2? Anton Yurchenko
  2003-10-08 14:03 ` nuclearcat
  2003-10-08 14:11 ` Lawrence MacIntyre
@ 2003-10-08 16:56 ` Wilfried Weissmann
  2003-10-09  8:44 ` Anton Yurchenko
  2003-10-09 16:45 ` Stef Coene
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wilfried Weissmann @ 2003-10-08 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

Anton Yurchenko wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems. 
> Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC 
> related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached 
> to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more 
> ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and 
> rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the 
> same issue? thanks
> 

check your burst and quantum settings. maybe they are too low.

bye,
wilfried


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
  2003-10-08 13:49 [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2? Anton Yurchenko
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-10-08 16:56 ` Wilfried Weissmann
@ 2003-10-09  8:44 ` Anton Yurchenko
  2003-10-09 16:45 ` Stef Coene
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Anton Yurchenko @ 2003-10-09  8:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com wrote:

>Hello Anton,
>
>Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 4:49:30 PM, you wrote:
>
>I am using HTB3 with more than 10 megabits customers, and
>amount of classes about 100-200 without any problem.
>Only one what i do - i make filter with lowest priority, to not pass
>ass unclassified traffic to default class, just to drop it. I think
>you just need review your classes, because also if you have any rate
>more 468 Kbit, you need change r2q or quantum.
>  
>
the problem was observed even when only adding a qdisc, no classes. how 
can this be?

>AY> Hello,
>
>AY> I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems. 
>AY> Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC 
>AY> related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached 
>AY> to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more 
>AY> ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and 
>AY> rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the 
>AY> same issue? thanks
>
>
>
>
>  
>


-- 

Anton Yurchenko<phila@dg.net.ua>
Digital Generation


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
  2003-10-08 13:49 [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2? Anton Yurchenko
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-10-09  8:44 ` Anton Yurchenko
@ 2003-10-09 16:45 ` Stef Coene
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stef Coene @ 2003-10-09 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

On Thursday 09 October 2003 10:44, Anton Yurchenko wrote:
> nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com wrote:
> >Hello Anton,
> >
> >Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 4:49:30 PM, you wrote:
> >
> >I am using HTB3 with more than 10 megabits customers, and
> >amount of classes about 100-200 without any problem.
> >Only one what i do - i make filter with lowest priority, to not pass
> >ass unclassified traffic to default class, just to drop it. I think
> >you just need review your classes, because also if you have any rate
> >more 468 Kbit, you need change r2q or quantum.
>
> the problem was observed even when only adding a qdisc, no classes. how
> can this be?
What's the output of
tc -s -d qdisc show dev eth0
tc -s -d class show dev eth0

Stef

-- 
stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-09 16:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-08 13:49 [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2? Anton Yurchenko
2003-10-08 14:03 ` nuclearcat
2003-10-08 14:11 ` Lawrence MacIntyre
2003-10-08 16:56 ` Wilfried Weissmann
2003-10-09  8:44 ` Anton Yurchenko
2003-10-09 16:45 ` Stef Coene

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.