From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: jason.ekstrand@intel.com,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
daniel.vetter@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 36/97] drm/i915/guc: Add non blocking CTB send function
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 16:13:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210609231348.GC5471@sdutt-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d8bda772-6c9d-8513-d2c0-ea126ece5a24@intel.com>
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 04:14:05PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>
>
> On 07.06.2021 19:31, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 04:11:50PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>
> >> On 27/05/2021 15:35, Matthew Brost wrote:
> >>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 11:02:24AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 26/05/2021 19:10, Matthew Brost wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> [snip]
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>> +static int ct_send_nb(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> >>>>>>>>> + const u32 *action,
> >>>>>>>>> + u32 len,
> >>>>>>>>> + u32 flags)
> >>>>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>>>> + struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.send;
> >>>>>>>>> + unsigned long spin_flags;
> >>>>>>>>> + u32 fence;
> >>>>>>>>> + int ret;
> >>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ctb->lock, spin_flags);
> >>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>> + ret = ctb_has_room(ctb, len + 1);
> >>>>>>>>> + if (unlikely(ret))
> >>>>>>>>> + goto out;
> >>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>> + fence = ct_get_next_fence(ct);
> >>>>>>>>> + ret = ct_write(ct, action, len, fence, flags);
> >>>>>>>>> + if (unlikely(ret))
> >>>>>>>>> + goto out;
> >>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>> + intel_guc_notify(ct_to_guc(ct));
> >>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>> +out:
> >>>>>>>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctb->lock, spin_flags);
> >>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>> + return ret;
> >>>>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>> static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> >>>>>>>>> const u32 *action,
> >>>>>>>>> u32 len,
> >>>>>>>>> @@ -473,6 +541,7 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> >>>>>>>>> u32 response_buf_size,
> >>>>>>>>> u32 *status)
> >>>>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>>>> + struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.send;
> >>>>>>>>> struct ct_request request;
> >>>>>>>>> unsigned long flags;
> >>>>>>>>> u32 fence;
> >>>>>>>>> @@ -482,8 +551,20 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> >>>>>>>>> GEM_BUG_ON(!len);
> >>>>>>>>> GEM_BUG_ON(len & ~GUC_CT_MSG_LEN_MASK);
> >>>>>>>>> GEM_BUG_ON(!response_buf && response_buf_size);
> >>>>>>>>> + might_sleep();
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Sleep is just cond_resched below or there is more?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yes, the cond_resched.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> + /*
> >>>>>>>>> + * We use a lazy spin wait loop here as we believe that if the CT
> >>>>>>>>> + * buffers are sized correctly the flow control condition should be
> >>>>>>>>> + * rare.
> >>>>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>>>> +retry:
> >>>>>>>>> spin_lock_irqsave(&ct->ctbs.send.lock, flags);
> >>>>>>>>> + if (unlikely(!ctb_has_room(ctb, len + 1))) {
> >>>>>>>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ct->ctbs.send.lock, flags);
> >>>>>>>>> + cond_resched();
> >>>>>>>>> + goto retry;
> >>>>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If this patch is about adding a non-blocking send function, and below we can
> >>>>>>>> see that it creates a fork:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> intel_guc_ct_send:
> >>>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>> if (flags & INTEL_GUC_SEND_NB)
> >>>>>>>> return ct_send_nb(ct, action, len, flags);
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ret = ct_send(ct, action, len, response_buf, response_buf_size, &status);
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Then why is there a change in ct_send here, which is not the new
> >>>>>>>> non-blocking path?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> There is not a change to ct_send(), just to intel_guc_ct_send.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I was doing by the diff which says:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> >>>>>> const u32 *action,
> >>>>>> u32 len,
> >>>>>> @@ -473,6 +541,7 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> >>>>>> u32 response_buf_size,
> >>>>>> u32 *status)
> >>>>>> {
> >>>>>> + struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.send;
> >>>>>> struct ct_request request;
> >>>>>> unsigned long flags;
> >>>>>> u32 fence;
> >>>>>> @@ -482,8 +551,20 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> >>>>>> GEM_BUG_ON(!len);
> >>>>>> GEM_BUG_ON(len & ~GUC_CT_MSG_LEN_MASK);
> >>>>>> GEM_BUG_ON(!response_buf && response_buf_size);
> >>>>>> + might_sleep();
> >>>>>> + /*
> >>>>>> + * We use a lazy spin wait loop here as we believe that if the CT
> >>>>>> + * buffers are sized correctly the flow control condition should be
> >>>>>> + * rare.
> >>>>>> + */
> >>>>>> +retry:
> >>>>>> spin_lock_irqsave(&ct->ctbs.send.lock, flags);
> >>>>>> + if (unlikely(!ctb_has_room(ctb, len + 1))) {
> >>>>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ct->ctbs.send.lock, flags);
> >>>>>> + cond_resched();
> >>>>>> + goto retry;
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So it looks like a change to ct_send to me. Is that wrong?
> >>>>
> >>>> What about this part - is the patch changing the blocking ct_send or not,
> >>>> and if it is why?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Yes, ct_send() changes. Sorry for the confusion.
> >>>
> >>> This function needs to be updated to account for the H2G space and
> >>> backoff if no space is available.
> >>
> >> Since this one is the sleeping path, it probably can and needs to be smarter
> >> than having a cond_resched busy loop added. Like sleep and get woken up when
> >> there is space. Otherwise it can degenerate to busy looping via contention
> >> with the non-blocking path.
> >>
> >
> > That screams over enginerring a simple problem to me. If the CT channel
> > is full we are really in trouble anyways - i.e. the performance is going
> > to terrible as we overwhelmed the GuC with traffic. That being said,
> > IGTs can do this but that really isn't a real world use case. For the
> > real world, this buffer is large enough that it won't ever be full hence
> > the comment + lazy spin loop.
> >
> > Next, it isn't like we get an interrupt or something when space
> > becomes available so how would we wake this thread? Could we come up
> > with a convoluted scheme where we insert ops that generated an interrupt
> > at regular intervals, probably? Would it be super complicated, totally
> > unnecessary, and gain use nothing - absolutely.
> >
> > Lastly, blocking CTBs really shouldn't ever be used. Certainly the
> > submission code doesn't use these. I think SRIOV might, but those can
> > probably be reworked too to use non-blocking. At some point we might
> > want to scrub the driver and just delete the blocking path.
>
> I guess the main problem is not with "blocking CTBs", as now only
> calling thread is "blocked" waiting for reply and other threads can
> still send their CTBs (blocked/nonblocking), but the fact that we are
> sending too many messages, stopping only when CTB is full, and even then
> trying hard to squeeze that message again.
>
> it should be caller responsibility to throttle its stream of
> non-blocking CTBs if either we are running out of CTB but if we have too
> many "non-blocking" requests in flight.
>
> making CTB buffer just larger and larger does not solve the problem,
> only makes it less visible
>
> and as you are using busy-loop to send even 'non-blocking' CTBs, it
> might indicate that your code is not prepared to step-back in case of
> any temporary CTB congestion
>
> also note that currently all CTB messages are asynchronous, REQUEST /
> RESPONSE pair could be processed in fully non-blocking approach, but
> that would require refactoring of part driver into event-driven state
> machine, as sometimes we can't move forward without information that we
> are waiting from the GuC (and blocking was simplest solution for that)
>
> but if your submission code is already event-driven, then it should be
> easier to trigger state machine into 'retry' mode without using this
> busy-loop
Yes, the state-machine is used in most cases as a back off where it
makes sense. Some cases we still just use a busy-loop. See my comments
about over engineering solutions - sometimes it is better to use
something simple for something that rare.
Matt
>
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >> Regards,
> >
> >>
> >> Tvrtko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-09 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 249+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-06 19:13 [RFC PATCH 00/97] Basic GuC submission support in the i915 Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 01/97] drm/i915/gt: Move engine setup out of set_default_submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-19 0:25 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 02/97] drm/i915/gt: Move submission_method into intel_gt Matthew Brost
2021-05-19 3:10 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 03/97] drm/i915/gt: Move CS interrupt handler to the backend Matthew Brost
2021-05-19 3:31 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 8:45 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 04/97] drm/i915/guc: skip disabling CTBs before sanitizing the GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-20 16:47 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 05/97] drm/i915/guc: use probe_error log for CT enablement failure Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 10:30 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 06/97] drm/i915/guc: enable only the user interrupt when using GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 0:31 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 07/97] drm/i915/guc: Remove sample_forcewake h2g action Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 10:48 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 0:36 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 08/97] drm/i915/guc: Keep strict GuC ABI definitions Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 23:52 ` Michał Winiarski
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 09/97] drm/i915/guc: Stop using fence/status from CTB descriptor Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 2:38 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 10/97] drm/i915: Promote ptrdiff() to i915_utils.h Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 0:42 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 11/97] drm/i915/guc: Only rely on own CTB size Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 2:47 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 12:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 12/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't repeat CTB layout calculations Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 2:53 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 13:07 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 16:56 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 13/97] drm/i915/guc: Replace CTB array with explicit members Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 3:15 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 14/97] drm/i915/guc: Update sizes of CTB buffers Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 2:56 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 15/97] drm/i915/guc: Relax CTB response timeout Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 18:08 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 19:37 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 16/97] drm/i915/guc: Start protecting access to CTB descriptors Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 3:21 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 3:21 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 17/97] drm/i915/guc: Stop using mutex while sending CTB messages Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 16:14 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 18/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't receive all G2H messages in irq handler Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 18:15 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 19:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 19/97] drm/i915/guc: Always copy CT message to new allocation Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 18:25 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 20/97] drm/i915/guc: Introduce unified HXG messages Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 15:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:59 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 22:11 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-12 8:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 21/97] drm/i915/guc: Update MMIO based communication Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 22/97] drm/i915/guc: Update CTB response status Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 23/97] drm/i915/guc: Support per context scheduling policies Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 1:15 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 24/97] drm/i915/guc: Add flag for mark broken CTB Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 19:44 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 25/97] drm/i915/guc: New definition of the CTB descriptor Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 26/97] drm/i915/guc: New definition of the CTB registration action Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 27/97] drm/i915/guc: New CTB based communication Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 28/97] drm/i915/guc: Kill guc_clients.ct_pool Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 1:01 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 29/97] drm/i915/guc: Update firmware to v60.1.2 Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 30/97] drm/i915/uc: turn on GuC/HuC auto mode by default Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 11:00 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 31/97] drm/i915/guc: Early initialization of GuC send registers Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 20:28 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 32/97] drm/i915: Introduce i915_sched_engine object Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 15:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:56 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 33/97] drm/i915: Engine relative MMIO Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 34/97] drm/i915/guc: Use guc_class instead of engine_class in fw interface Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 20:41 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 35/97] drm/i915/guc: Improve error message for unsolicited CT response Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 11:59 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 17:32 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 36/97] drm/i915/guc: Add non blocking CTB send function Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 12:21 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 17:30 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 9:21 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:21 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 8:57 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:10 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 10:02 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 14:35 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 15:11 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-07 17:31 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-08 8:39 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-08 8:46 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-09 23:10 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-10 15:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 16:38 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 17:25 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-09 13:58 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-09 23:05 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-09 14:14 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-09 23:13 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 37/97] drm/i915/guc: Add stall timer to " Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 12:58 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-24 18:35 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 14:15 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 16:54 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 38/97] drm/i915/guc: Optimize CTB writes and reads Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 13:31 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 17:39 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 39/97] drm/i915/guc: Increase size of CTB buffers Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 13:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-24 18:40 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 9:24 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:15 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 9:30 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:20 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 40/97] drm/i915/guc: Module load failure test for CT buffer creation Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 13:45 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 41/97] drm/i915/guc: Add new GuC interface defines and structures Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 42/97] drm/i915/guc: Remove GuC stage descriptor, add lrc descriptor Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 43/97] drm/i915/guc: Add lrc descriptor context lookup array Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 15:26 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:01 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 17:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 19:34 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 44/97] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC submission tasklet Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 9:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:10 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 45/97] drm/i915/guc: Add bypass tasklet submission path to GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 46/97] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC context operations for new inteface Matthew Brost
2021-05-29 20:32 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 47/97] drm/i915/guc: Insert fence on context when deregistering Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 48/97] drm/i915/guc: Defer context unpin until scheduling is disabled Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 49/97] drm/i915/guc: Disable engine barriers with GuC during unpin Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 15:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 16:31 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 10:26 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 50/97] drm/i915/guc: Extend deregistration fence to schedule disable Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 51/97] drm/i915: Disable preempt busywait when using GuC scheduling Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 52/97] drm/i915/guc: Ensure request ordering via completion fences Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 53/97] drm/i915/guc: Disable semaphores when using GuC scheduling Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 9:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:01 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 9:25 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:15 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 8:41 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 14:38 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 54/97] drm/i915/guc: Ensure G2H response has space in buffer Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 55/97] drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work with GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 10:06 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:07 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 9:21 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:18 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 9:02 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 14:37 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 56/97] drm/i915/guc: Update GuC debugfs to support new GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 57/97] drm/i915/guc: Add several request trace points Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 58/97] drm/i915: Add intel_context tracing Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 59/97] drm/i915/guc: GuC virtual engines Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 60/97] drm/i915: Track 'serial' counts for " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 10:16 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:52 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 8:40 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:45 ` John Harrison
2021-05-27 8:53 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 17:01 ` John Harrison
2021-06-01 9:31 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-02 1:20 ` John Harrison
2021-06-02 12:04 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-02 12:09 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 61/97] drm/i915: Hold reference to intel_context over life of i915_request Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 12:18 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 62/97] drm/i915/guc: Disable bonding extension with GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 63/97] drm/i915/guc: Direct all breadcrumbs for a class to single breadcrumbs Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 13:31 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 64/97] drm/i915/guc: Reset implementation for new GuC interface Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 14:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-04 3:17 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-04 8:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-04 18:02 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 65/97] drm/i915: Reset GPU immediately if submission is disabled Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 14:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 66/97] drm/i915/guc: Add disable interrupts to guc sanitize Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 8:16 ` [drm/i915/guc] 07336fb545: WARNING:at_drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c:#__uc_sanitize[i915] kernel test robot
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 67/97] drm/i915/guc: Suspend/resume implementation for new interface Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 68/97] drm/i915/guc: Handle context reset notification Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 69/97] drm/i915/guc: Handle engine reset failure notification Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 70/97] drm/i915/guc: Enable the timer expired interrupt for GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 71/97] drm/i915/guc: Provide mmio list to be saved/restored on engine reset Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 72/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't complain about reset races Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 73/97] drm/i915/guc: Enable GuC engine reset Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 74/97] drm/i915/guc: Capture error state on context reset Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 16:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:12 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 17:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 75/97] drm/i915/guc: Fix for error capture after full GPU reset with GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 76/97] drm/i915/guc: Hook GuC scheduling policies up Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 77/97] drm/i915/guc: Connect reset modparam updates to GuC policy flags Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 78/97] drm/i915/guc: Include scheduling policies in the debugfs state dump Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 79/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't call ring_is_idle in GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 80/97] drm/i915/guc: Implement banned contexts for " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 81/97] drm/i915/guc: Allow flexible number of context ids Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 82/97] drm/i915/guc: Connect the number of guc_ids to debugfs Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 83/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't return -EAGAIN to user when guc_ids exhausted Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 84/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't allow requests not ready to consume all guc_ids Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 85/97] drm/i915/guc: Introduce guc_submit_engine object Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 86/97] drm/i915/guc: Add golden context to GuC ADS Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 87/97] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC priority management Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 88/97] drm/i915/guc: Support request cancellation Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 89/97] drm/i915/guc: Check return of __xa_store when registering a context Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 90/97] drm/i915/guc: Non-static lrc descriptor registration buffer Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 91/97] drm/i915/guc: Take GT PM ref when deregistering context Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 92/97] drm/i915: Add GT PM delayed worker Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 93/97] drm/i915/guc: Take engine PM when a context is pinned with GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 94/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't call switch_to_kernel_context " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 95/97] drm/i915/guc: Selftest for GuC flow control Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 96/97] drm/i915/guc: Update GuC documentation Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 97/97] drm/i915/guc: Unblock GuC submission on Gen11+ Matthew Brost
2021-05-09 17:12 ` [RFC PATCH 00/97] Basic GuC submission support in the i915 Martin Peres
2021-05-09 23:11 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-10 13:55 ` Martin Peres
2021-05-10 16:25 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-11 8:01 ` Martin Peres
2021-05-10 16:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-10 18:30 ` [Intel-gfx] " Francisco Jerez
2021-05-11 8:06 ` Martin Peres
2021-05-11 15:26 ` Bloomfield, Jon
2021-05-11 16:39 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-12 6:26 ` Martin Peres
2021-05-14 16:31 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-25 15:37 ` Alex Deucher
2021-05-11 2:58 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-05-11 7:47 ` Martin Peres
2021-05-14 11:11 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-14 16:36 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-14 16:46 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-14 16:41 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 10:32 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 16:45 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 15:27 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-02 18:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-03 3:41 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-03 4:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-03 9:49 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-03 10:52 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-03 4:10 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-03 8:51 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-03 16:34 ` Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210609231348.GC5471@sdutt-i7 \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jason.ekstrand@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).