From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: jason.ekstrand@intel.com, daniel.vetter@intel.com,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 36/97] drm/i915/guc: Add non blocking CTB send function
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 11:02:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53613c13-1cab-b9bd-3922-0389600773ee@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210526181053.GA3435@sdutt-i7>
On 26/05/2021 19:10, Matthew Brost wrote:
[snip]
>>>>> +static int ct_send_nb(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>>>>> + const u32 *action,
>>>>> + u32 len,
>>>>> + u32 flags)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.send;
>>>>> + unsigned long spin_flags;
>>>>> + u32 fence;
>>>>> + int ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ctb->lock, spin_flags);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + ret = ctb_has_room(ctb, len + 1);
>>>>> + if (unlikely(ret))
>>>>> + goto out;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + fence = ct_get_next_fence(ct);
>>>>> + ret = ct_write(ct, action, len, fence, flags);
>>>>> + if (unlikely(ret))
>>>>> + goto out;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + intel_guc_notify(ct_to_guc(ct));
>>>>> +
>>>>> +out:
>>>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctb->lock, spin_flags);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>>>>> const u32 *action,
>>>>> u32 len,
>>>>> @@ -473,6 +541,7 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>>>>> u32 response_buf_size,
>>>>> u32 *status)
>>>>> {
>>>>> + struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.send;
>>>>> struct ct_request request;
>>>>> unsigned long flags;
>>>>> u32 fence;
>>>>> @@ -482,8 +551,20 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>>>>> GEM_BUG_ON(!len);
>>>>> GEM_BUG_ON(len & ~GUC_CT_MSG_LEN_MASK);
>>>>> GEM_BUG_ON(!response_buf && response_buf_size);
>>>>> + might_sleep();
>>>>
>>>> Sleep is just cond_resched below or there is more?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, the cond_resched.
>>>
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * We use a lazy spin wait loop here as we believe that if the CT
>>>>> + * buffers are sized correctly the flow control condition should be
>>>>> + * rare.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +retry:
>>>>> spin_lock_irqsave(&ct->ctbs.send.lock, flags);
>>>>> + if (unlikely(!ctb_has_room(ctb, len + 1))) {
>>>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ct->ctbs.send.lock, flags);
>>>>> + cond_resched();
>>>>> + goto retry;
>>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> If this patch is about adding a non-blocking send function, and below we can
>>>> see that it creates a fork:
>>>>
>>>> intel_guc_ct_send:
>>>> ...
>>>> if (flags & INTEL_GUC_SEND_NB)
>>>> return ct_send_nb(ct, action, len, flags);
>>>>
>>>> ret = ct_send(ct, action, len, response_buf, response_buf_size, &status);
>>>>
>>>> Then why is there a change in ct_send here, which is not the new
>>>> non-blocking path?
>>>>
>>>
>>> There is not a change to ct_send(), just to intel_guc_ct_send.
>>
>> I was doing by the diff which says:
>>
>> static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>> const u32 *action,
>> u32 len,
>> @@ -473,6 +541,7 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>> u32 response_buf_size,
>> u32 *status)
>> {
>> + struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.send;
>> struct ct_request request;
>> unsigned long flags;
>> u32 fence;
>> @@ -482,8 +551,20 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>> GEM_BUG_ON(!len);
>> GEM_BUG_ON(len & ~GUC_CT_MSG_LEN_MASK);
>> GEM_BUG_ON(!response_buf && response_buf_size);
>> + might_sleep();
>> + /*
>> + * We use a lazy spin wait loop here as we believe that if the CT
>> + * buffers are sized correctly the flow control condition should be
>> + * rare.
>> + */
>> +retry:
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&ct->ctbs.send.lock, flags);
>> + if (unlikely(!ctb_has_room(ctb, len + 1))) {
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ct->ctbs.send.lock, flags);
>> + cond_resched();
>> + goto retry;
>> + }
>>
>> So it looks like a change to ct_send to me. Is that wrong?
What about this part - is the patch changing the blocking ct_send or
not, and if it is why?
Regards,
Tvrtko
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tvrtko
>>
>>> As for why intel_guc_ct_send is updated and we don't just a new public
>>> function, this was another reviewers suggestion. Again can't make
>>> everyone happy.
>>>>> fence = ct_get_next_fence(ct);
>>>>> request.fence = fence;
>>>>> @@ -495,7 +576,7 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>>>>> list_add_tail(&request.link, &ct->requests.pending);
>>>>> spin_unlock(&ct->requests.lock);
>>>>> - err = ct_write(ct, action, len, fence);
>>>>> + err = ct_write(ct, action, len, fence, 0);
>>>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ct->ctbs.send.lock, flags);
>>>>> @@ -537,7 +618,7 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>>>>> * Command Transport (CT) buffer based GuC send function.
>>>>> */
>>>>> int intel_guc_ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len,
>>>>> - u32 *response_buf, u32 response_buf_size)
>>>>> + u32 *response_buf, u32 response_buf_size, u32 flags)
>>>>> {
>>>>> u32 status = ~0; /* undefined */
>>>>> int ret;
>>>>> @@ -547,6 +628,9 @@ int intel_guc_ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len,
>>>>> return -ENODEV;
>>>>> }
>>>>> + if (flags & INTEL_GUC_SEND_NB)
>>>>> + return ct_send_nb(ct, action, len, flags);
>>>>> +
>>>>> ret = ct_send(ct, action, len, response_buf, response_buf_size, &status);
>>>>> if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
>>>>> CT_ERROR(ct, "Sending action %#x failed (err=%d status=%#X)\n",
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
>>>>> index 1ae2dde6db93..55ef7c52472f 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
>>>>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>>>> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>>>> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>>>>> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>>>>> +#include <linux/ktime.h>
>>>>> #include "intel_guc_fwif.h"
>>>>> @@ -42,7 +43,6 @@ struct intel_guc_ct_buffer {
>>>>> bool broken;
>>>>> };
>>>>> -
>>>>> /** Top-level structure for Command Transport related data
>>>>> *
>>>>> * Includes a pair of CT buffers for bi-directional communication and tracking
>>>>> @@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ struct intel_guc_ct {
>>>>> struct list_head incoming; /* incoming requests */
>>>>> struct work_struct worker; /* handler for incoming requests */
>>>>> } requests;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /** @stall_time: time of first time a CTB submission is stalled */
>>>>> + ktime_t stall_time;
>>>>
>>>> Unused in this patch.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yea, wrong patch. Will fix.
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>>> };
>>>>> void intel_guc_ct_init_early(struct intel_guc_ct *ct);
>>>>> @@ -88,7 +91,7 @@ static inline bool intel_guc_ct_enabled(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>>>>> }
>>>>> int intel_guc_ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len,
>>>>> - u32 *response_buf, u32 response_buf_size);
>>>>> + u32 *response_buf, u32 response_buf_size, u32 flags);
>>>>> void intel_guc_ct_event_handler(struct intel_guc_ct *ct);
>>>>> #endif /* _INTEL_GUC_CT_H_ */
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Tvrtko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-27 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 249+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-06 19:13 [RFC PATCH 00/97] Basic GuC submission support in the i915 Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 01/97] drm/i915/gt: Move engine setup out of set_default_submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-19 0:25 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 02/97] drm/i915/gt: Move submission_method into intel_gt Matthew Brost
2021-05-19 3:10 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 03/97] drm/i915/gt: Move CS interrupt handler to the backend Matthew Brost
2021-05-19 3:31 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 8:45 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 04/97] drm/i915/guc: skip disabling CTBs before sanitizing the GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-20 16:47 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 05/97] drm/i915/guc: use probe_error log for CT enablement failure Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 10:30 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 06/97] drm/i915/guc: enable only the user interrupt when using GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 0:31 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 07/97] drm/i915/guc: Remove sample_forcewake h2g action Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 10:48 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 0:36 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 08/97] drm/i915/guc: Keep strict GuC ABI definitions Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 23:52 ` Michał Winiarski
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 09/97] drm/i915/guc: Stop using fence/status from CTB descriptor Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 2:38 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 10/97] drm/i915: Promote ptrdiff() to i915_utils.h Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 0:42 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 11/97] drm/i915/guc: Only rely on own CTB size Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 2:47 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 12:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 12/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't repeat CTB layout calculations Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 2:53 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 13:07 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 16:56 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 13/97] drm/i915/guc: Replace CTB array with explicit members Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 3:15 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 14/97] drm/i915/guc: Update sizes of CTB buffers Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 2:56 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 15/97] drm/i915/guc: Relax CTB response timeout Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 18:08 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 19:37 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 16/97] drm/i915/guc: Start protecting access to CTB descriptors Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 3:21 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 3:21 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 17/97] drm/i915/guc: Stop using mutex while sending CTB messages Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 16:14 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 18/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't receive all G2H messages in irq handler Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 18:15 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 19:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 19/97] drm/i915/guc: Always copy CT message to new allocation Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 18:25 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 20/97] drm/i915/guc: Introduce unified HXG messages Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 15:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:59 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 22:11 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-12 8:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 21/97] drm/i915/guc: Update MMIO based communication Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 22/97] drm/i915/guc: Update CTB response status Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 23/97] drm/i915/guc: Support per context scheduling policies Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 1:15 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 24/97] drm/i915/guc: Add flag for mark broken CTB Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 19:44 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 25/97] drm/i915/guc: New definition of the CTB descriptor Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 26/97] drm/i915/guc: New definition of the CTB registration action Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 27/97] drm/i915/guc: New CTB based communication Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 28/97] drm/i915/guc: Kill guc_clients.ct_pool Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 1:01 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 29/97] drm/i915/guc: Update firmware to v60.1.2 Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 30/97] drm/i915/uc: turn on GuC/HuC auto mode by default Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 11:00 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 31/97] drm/i915/guc: Early initialization of GuC send registers Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 20:28 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 32/97] drm/i915: Introduce i915_sched_engine object Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 15:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:56 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 33/97] drm/i915: Engine relative MMIO Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 34/97] drm/i915/guc: Use guc_class instead of engine_class in fw interface Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 20:41 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 35/97] drm/i915/guc: Improve error message for unsolicited CT response Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 11:59 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 17:32 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 36/97] drm/i915/guc: Add non blocking CTB send function Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 12:21 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 17:30 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 9:21 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:21 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 8:57 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:10 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 10:02 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2021-05-27 14:35 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 15:11 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-07 17:31 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-08 8:39 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-08 8:46 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-09 23:10 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-10 15:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 16:38 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 17:25 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-09 13:58 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-09 23:05 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-09 14:14 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-09 23:13 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 37/97] drm/i915/guc: Add stall timer to " Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 12:58 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-24 18:35 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 14:15 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 16:54 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 38/97] drm/i915/guc: Optimize CTB writes and reads Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 13:31 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 17:39 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 39/97] drm/i915/guc: Increase size of CTB buffers Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 13:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-24 18:40 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 9:24 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:15 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 9:30 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:20 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 40/97] drm/i915/guc: Module load failure test for CT buffer creation Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 13:45 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 41/97] drm/i915/guc: Add new GuC interface defines and structures Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 42/97] drm/i915/guc: Remove GuC stage descriptor, add lrc descriptor Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 43/97] drm/i915/guc: Add lrc descriptor context lookup array Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 15:26 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:01 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 17:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 19:34 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 44/97] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC submission tasklet Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 9:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:10 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [RFC PATCH 45/97] drm/i915/guc: Add bypass tasklet submission path to GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 46/97] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC context operations for new inteface Matthew Brost
2021-05-29 20:32 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 47/97] drm/i915/guc: Insert fence on context when deregistering Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 48/97] drm/i915/guc: Defer context unpin until scheduling is disabled Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 49/97] drm/i915/guc: Disable engine barriers with GuC during unpin Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 15:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 16:31 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 10:26 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 50/97] drm/i915/guc: Extend deregistration fence to schedule disable Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 51/97] drm/i915: Disable preempt busywait when using GuC scheduling Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 52/97] drm/i915/guc: Ensure request ordering via completion fences Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 53/97] drm/i915/guc: Disable semaphores when using GuC scheduling Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 9:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:01 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 9:25 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:15 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 8:41 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 14:38 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 54/97] drm/i915/guc: Ensure G2H response has space in buffer Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 55/97] drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work with GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 10:06 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:07 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 9:21 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:18 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 9:02 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 14:37 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 56/97] drm/i915/guc: Update GuC debugfs to support new GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 57/97] drm/i915/guc: Add several request trace points Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 58/97] drm/i915: Add intel_context tracing Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 59/97] drm/i915/guc: GuC virtual engines Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 60/97] drm/i915: Track 'serial' counts for " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 10:16 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:52 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 8:40 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:45 ` John Harrison
2021-05-27 8:53 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 17:01 ` John Harrison
2021-06-01 9:31 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-02 1:20 ` John Harrison
2021-06-02 12:04 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-02 12:09 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 61/97] drm/i915: Hold reference to intel_context over life of i915_request Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 12:18 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 62/97] drm/i915/guc: Disable bonding extension with GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 63/97] drm/i915/guc: Direct all breadcrumbs for a class to single breadcrumbs Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 13:31 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 64/97] drm/i915/guc: Reset implementation for new GuC interface Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 14:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-04 3:17 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-04 8:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-04 18:02 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 65/97] drm/i915: Reset GPU immediately if submission is disabled Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 14:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 66/97] drm/i915/guc: Add disable interrupts to guc sanitize Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 8:16 ` [drm/i915/guc] 07336fb545: WARNING:at_drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c:#__uc_sanitize[i915] kernel test robot
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 67/97] drm/i915/guc: Suspend/resume implementation for new interface Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 68/97] drm/i915/guc: Handle context reset notification Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 69/97] drm/i915/guc: Handle engine reset failure notification Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 70/97] drm/i915/guc: Enable the timer expired interrupt for GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 71/97] drm/i915/guc: Provide mmio list to be saved/restored on engine reset Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 72/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't complain about reset races Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 73/97] drm/i915/guc: Enable GuC engine reset Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 74/97] drm/i915/guc: Capture error state on context reset Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 16:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:12 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 17:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 75/97] drm/i915/guc: Fix for error capture after full GPU reset with GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 76/97] drm/i915/guc: Hook GuC scheduling policies up Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 77/97] drm/i915/guc: Connect reset modparam updates to GuC policy flags Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 78/97] drm/i915/guc: Include scheduling policies in the debugfs state dump Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 79/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't call ring_is_idle in GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 80/97] drm/i915/guc: Implement banned contexts for " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 81/97] drm/i915/guc: Allow flexible number of context ids Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 82/97] drm/i915/guc: Connect the number of guc_ids to debugfs Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 83/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't return -EAGAIN to user when guc_ids exhausted Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 84/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't allow requests not ready to consume all guc_ids Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 85/97] drm/i915/guc: Introduce guc_submit_engine object Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 86/97] drm/i915/guc: Add golden context to GuC ADS Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 87/97] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC priority management Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 88/97] drm/i915/guc: Support request cancellation Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 89/97] drm/i915/guc: Check return of __xa_store when registering a context Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 90/97] drm/i915/guc: Non-static lrc descriptor registration buffer Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 91/97] drm/i915/guc: Take GT PM ref when deregistering context Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 92/97] drm/i915: Add GT PM delayed worker Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 93/97] drm/i915/guc: Take engine PM when a context is pinned with GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 94/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't call switch_to_kernel_context " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 95/97] drm/i915/guc: Selftest for GuC flow control Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 96/97] drm/i915/guc: Update GuC documentation Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 97/97] drm/i915/guc: Unblock GuC submission on Gen11+ Matthew Brost
2021-05-09 17:12 ` [RFC PATCH 00/97] Basic GuC submission support in the i915 Martin Peres
2021-05-09 23:11 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-10 13:55 ` Martin Peres
2021-05-10 16:25 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-11 8:01 ` Martin Peres
2021-05-10 16:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-10 18:30 ` [Intel-gfx] " Francisco Jerez
2021-05-11 8:06 ` Martin Peres
2021-05-11 15:26 ` Bloomfield, Jon
2021-05-11 16:39 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-12 6:26 ` Martin Peres
2021-05-14 16:31 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-25 15:37 ` Alex Deucher
2021-05-11 2:58 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-05-11 7:47 ` Martin Peres
2021-05-14 11:11 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-14 16:36 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-14 16:46 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-14 16:41 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 10:32 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 16:45 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 15:27 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-02 18:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-03 3:41 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-03 4:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-03 9:49 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-03 10:52 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-03 4:10 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-03 8:51 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-03 16:34 ` Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53613c13-1cab-b9bd-3922-0389600773ee@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jason.ekstrand@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).