From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/47] drm/i915/guc: Add non blocking CTB send function
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:50:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d250e86-1d2e-53b3-4ae1-ef126a05c617@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624224119.GA19733@sdutt-i7>
On 25.06.2021 00:41, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 07:02:18PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 24.06.2021 17:49, Matthew Brost wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 04:48:32PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 24.06.2021 09:04, Matthew Brost wrote:
>>>>> Add non blocking CTB send function, intel_guc_send_nb. GuC submission
>>>>> will send CTBs in the critical path and does not need to wait for these
>>>>> CTBs to complete before moving on, hence the need for this new function.
>>>>>
>>>>> The non-blocking CTB now must have a flow control mechanism to ensure
>>>>> the buffer isn't overrun. A lazy spin wait is used as we believe the
>>>>> flow control condition should be rare with a properly sized buffer.
>>>>>
>>>>> The function, intel_guc_send_nb, is exported in this patch but unused.
>>>>> Several patches later in the series make use of this function.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h | 12 +++-
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h | 3 +-
>>>>> 3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
>>>>> index 4abc59f6f3cd..24b1df6ad4ae 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
>>>>> @@ -74,7 +74,15 @@ static inline struct intel_guc *log_to_guc(struct intel_guc_log *log)
>>>>> static
>>>>> inline int intel_guc_send(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len)
>>>>> {
>>>>> - return intel_guc_ct_send(&guc->ct, action, len, NULL, 0);
>>>>> + return intel_guc_ct_send(&guc->ct, action, len, NULL, 0, 0);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#define INTEL_GUC_SEND_NB BIT(31)
>>>>
>>>> hmm, this flag really belongs to intel_guc_ct_send() so it should be
>>>> defined as CTB flag near that function declaration
>>>>
>>>
>>> I can move this up a few lines.
>>>
>>>>> +static
>>>>> +inline int intel_guc_send_nb(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + return intel_guc_ct_send(&guc->ct, action, len, NULL, 0,
>>>>> + INTEL_GUC_SEND_NB);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> static inline int
>>>>> @@ -82,7 +90,7 @@ intel_guc_send_and_receive(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len,
>>>>> u32 *response_buf, u32 response_buf_size)
>>>>> {
>>>>> return intel_guc_ct_send(&guc->ct, action, len,
>>>>> - response_buf, response_buf_size);
>>>>> + response_buf, response_buf_size, 0);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> static inline void intel_guc_to_host_event_handler(struct intel_guc *guc)
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
>>>>> index a17215920e58..c9a65d05911f 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
>>>>> @@ -3,6 +3,11 @@
>>>>> * Copyright © 2016-2019 Intel Corporation
>>>>> */
>>>>>
>>>>> +#include <linux/circ_buf.h>
>>>>> +#include <linux/ktime.h>
>>>>> +#include <linux/time64.h>
>>>>> +#include <linux/timekeeping.h>
>>>>> +
>>>>> #include "i915_drv.h"
>>>>> #include "intel_guc_ct.h"
>>>>> #include "gt/intel_gt.h"
>>>>> @@ -373,7 +378,7 @@ static void write_barrier(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>>>>> static int ct_write(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>>>>> const u32 *action,
>>>>> u32 len /* in dwords */,
>>>>> - u32 fence)
>>>>> + u32 fence, u32 flags)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.send;
>>>>> struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc = ctb->desc;
>>>>> @@ -421,9 +426,13 @@ static int ct_write(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>>>>> FIELD_PREP(GUC_CTB_MSG_0_NUM_DWORDS, len) |
>>>>> FIELD_PREP(GUC_CTB_MSG_0_FENCE, fence);
>>>>>
>>>>> - hxg = FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, GUC_HXG_TYPE_REQUEST) |
>>>>> - FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_0_ACTION |
>>>>> - GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_0_DATA0, action[0]);
>>>>> + hxg = (flags & INTEL_GUC_SEND_NB) ?
>>>>> + (FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, GUC_HXG_TYPE_EVENT) |
>>>>> + FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_EVENT_MSG_0_ACTION |
>>>>> + GUC_HXG_EVENT_MSG_0_DATA0, action[0])) :
>>>>> + (FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, GUC_HXG_TYPE_REQUEST) |
>>>>> + FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_0_ACTION |
>>>>> + GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_0_DATA0, action[0]));
>>>>
>>>> or as we already switched to accept and return whole HXG messages in
>>>> guc_send_mmio() maybe we should do the same for CTB variant too and
>>>> instead of using extra flag just let caller to prepare proper HXG header
>>>> with HXG_EVENT type and then in CTB code just look at this type to make
>>>> decision which code path to use
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not sure I follow. Anyways could this be done in a follow up by you if
>>> want this change.
>>>
>>>> note that existing callers should not be impacted, as full HXG header
>>>> for the REQUEST message looks exactly the same as "action" code alone.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> CT_DEBUG(ct, "writing (tail %u) %*ph %*ph %*ph\n",
>>>>> tail, 4, &header, 4, &hxg, 4 * (len - 1), &action[1]);
>>>>> @@ -498,6 +507,46 @@ static int wait_for_ct_request_update(struct ct_request *req, u32 *status)
>>>>> return err;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> +static inline bool h2g_has_room(struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb, u32 len_dw)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc = ctb->desc;
>>>>> + u32 head = READ_ONCE(desc->head);
>>>>> + u32 space;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + space = CIRC_SPACE(desc->tail, head, ctb->size);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return space >= len_dw;
>>>>
>>>> here you are returning true(1) as has room
>>>>
>>>
>>> See below.
>>>
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static int ct_send_nb(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>>>>> + const u32 *action,
>>>>> + u32 len,
>>>>> + u32 flags)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.send;
>>>>> + unsigned long spin_flags;
>>>>> + u32 fence;
>>>>> + int ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ctb->lock, spin_flags);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + ret = h2g_has_room(ctb, len + 1);
>>>>
>>>> but here you treat "1" it as en error
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, this patch is broken but fixed in a follow up one. Regardless I'll
>>> fix this patch in place.
>>>
>>>> and this "1" is GUC_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN, right ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not exactly. This is following how ct_send() uses the action + len
>>> field. Action[0] field goes in the HXG header and extra + 1 is for the
>>> CT header.
>>
>> well, "len" already counts "action" so by treating input as full HXG
>> message (including HXG header) will make it cleaner
>>
>
> Yes, I know. See above. To me GUC_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN makes zero sense and
> it is worse than adding + 1. This + 1 accounts for the CT header not the
> HXG header. If any we add a new define, GUC_CT_HDR_LEN, and add that.
you mean GUC_CTB_MSG_MIN_LEN ? it's already there [1]
[1]
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip/tree/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h#n82
>
> Matt
>
>> we can try do it later but by doing it right now we would avoid
>> introducing this send_nb() function and deprecating them long term again
>>
>>>
>>>>> + if (unlikely(ret))
>>>>> + goto out;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + fence = ct_get_next_fence(ct);
>>>>> + ret = ct_write(ct, action, len, fence, flags);
>>>>> + if (unlikely(ret))
>>>>> + goto out;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + intel_guc_notify(ct_to_guc(ct));
>>>>> +
>>>>> +out:
>>>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctb->lock, spin_flags);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>>>>> const u32 *action,
>>>>> u32 len,
>>>>> @@ -505,6 +554,7 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>>>>> u32 response_buf_size,
>>>>> u32 *status)
>>>>> {
>>>>> + struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.send;
>>>>> struct ct_request request;
>>>>> unsigned long flags;
>>>>> u32 fence;
>>>>> @@ -514,8 +564,20 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>>>>> GEM_BUG_ON(!len);
>>>>> GEM_BUG_ON(len & ~GUC_CT_MSG_LEN_MASK);
>>>>> GEM_BUG_ON(!response_buf && response_buf_size);
>>>>> + might_sleep();
>>>>>
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * We use a lazy spin wait loop here as we believe that if the CT
>>>>> + * buffers are sized correctly the flow control condition should be
>>>>> + * rare.
>>>>
>>>> shouldn't we at least try to log such cases with RATE_LIMITED to find
>>>> out how "rare" it is, or if really unlikely just return -EBUSY as in
>>>> case of non-blocking send ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Definitely not return -EBUSY as this a blocking call. Perhaps we can log
>>
>> blocking calls still can fail for various reasons, full CTB is one of
>> them, and if we return error (now broken) for non-blocking variant then
>> we should do the same for blocking variant as well and let the caller
>> decide about next steps
>>
>>> this, but IGTs likely can hit rather easily. It really is only
>>> interesting if real workloads hit this. Regardless that can be a follow
>>> up.
>>
>> if we hide retry in a silent loop then we will not find it out if we hit
>> this condition (IGT or real WL) or not
>>
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +retry:
>>>>> spin_lock_irqsave(&ct->ctbs.send.lock, flags);
>>>>> + if (unlikely(!h2g_has_room(ctb, len + 1))) {
>>>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ct->ctbs.send.lock, flags);
>>>>> + cond_resched();
>>>>> + goto retry;
>>>>> + }
>>>>>
>>>>> fence = ct_get_next_fence(ct);
>>>>> request.fence = fence;
>>>>> @@ -527,7 +589,7 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>>>>> list_add_tail(&request.link, &ct->requests.pending);
>>>>> spin_unlock(&ct->requests.lock);
>>>>>
>>>>> - err = ct_write(ct, action, len, fence);
>>>>> + err = ct_write(ct, action, len, fence, 0);
>>>>>
>>>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ct->ctbs.send.lock, flags);
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -569,7 +631,7 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>>>>> * Command Transport (CT) buffer based GuC send function.
>>>>> */
>>>>> int intel_guc_ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len,
>>>>> - u32 *response_buf, u32 response_buf_size)
>>>>> + u32 *response_buf, u32 response_buf_size, u32 flags)
>>>>> {
>>>>> u32 status = ~0; /* undefined */
>>>>> int ret;
>>>>> @@ -579,6 +641,9 @@ int intel_guc_ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len,
>>>>> return -ENODEV;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> + if (flags & INTEL_GUC_SEND_NB)
>>>>> + return ct_send_nb(ct, action, len, flags);
>>>>> +
>>>>> ret = ct_send(ct, action, len, response_buf, response_buf_size, &status);
>>>>> if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
>>>>> CT_ERROR(ct, "Sending action %#x failed (err=%d status=%#X)\n",
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
>>>>> index 1ae2dde6db93..eb69263324ba 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
>>>>> @@ -42,7 +42,6 @@ struct intel_guc_ct_buffer {
>>>>> bool broken;
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>> /** Top-level structure for Command Transport related data
>>>>> *
>>>>> * Includes a pair of CT buffers for bi-directional communication and tracking
>>>>> @@ -88,7 +87,7 @@ static inline bool intel_guc_ct_enabled(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> int intel_guc_ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len,
>>>>> - u32 *response_buf, u32 response_buf_size);
>>>>> + u32 *response_buf, u32 response_buf_size, u32 flags);
>>>>> void intel_guc_ct_event_handler(struct intel_guc_ct *ct);
>>>>>
>>>>> #endif /* _INTEL_GUC_CT_H_ */
>>>>>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-25 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 170+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-24 7:04 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/47] GuC submission support Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/47] drm/i915/guc: Relax CTB response timeout Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 17:23 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/47] drm/i915/guc: Improve error message for unsolicited CT response Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 11:58 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/47] drm/i915/guc: Increase size of CTB buffers Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 13:49 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24 15:41 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 12:03 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/47] drm/i915/guc: Add non blocking CTB send function Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 14:48 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24 15:49 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 17:02 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24 22:41 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 11:50 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2021-06-25 17:53 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 22:47 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/47] drm/i915/guc: Add stall timer to " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 17:37 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24 23:01 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/47] drm/i915/guc: Optimize CTB writes and reads Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 13:09 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-25 18:26 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 20:28 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/47] drm/i915/guc: Module load failure test for CT buffer creation Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/47] drm/i915/guc: Add new GuC interface defines and structures Matthew Brost
2021-06-29 21:11 ` John Harrison
2021-06-30 0:30 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/47] drm/i915/guc: Remove GuC stage descriptor, add lrc descriptor Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 19:44 ` John Harrison
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/47] drm/i915/guc: Add lrc descriptor context lookup array Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 13:17 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-25 17:26 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-29 21:20 ` John Harrison
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/47] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC submission tasklet Matthew Brost
2021-06-29 22:04 ` John Harrison
2021-06-30 0:41 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/47] drm/i915/guc: Add bypass tasklet submission path to GuC Matthew Brost
2021-06-29 22:09 ` John Harrison
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/47] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC context operations for new inteface Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 13:25 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-25 17:46 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/47] drm/i915/guc: Insert fence on context when deregistering Matthew Brost
2021-07-09 22:39 ` John Harrison
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/47] drm/i915/guc: Defer context unpin until scheduling is disabled Matthew Brost
2021-07-09 22:48 ` John Harrison
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/47] drm/i915/guc: Disable engine barriers with GuC during unpin Matthew Brost
2021-07-09 22:53 ` John Harrison
2021-07-10 3:00 ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 17:57 ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 18:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/47] drm/i915/guc: Extend deregistration fence to schedule disable Matthew Brost
2021-07-09 22:59 ` John Harrison
2021-07-10 3:36 ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 17:54 ` John Harrison
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/47] drm/i915: Disable preempt busywait when using GuC scheduling Matthew Brost
2021-07-09 23:03 ` John Harrison
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/47] drm/i915/guc: Ensure request ordering via completion fences Matthew Brost
2021-07-15 1:51 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/47] drm/i915/guc: Disable semaphores when using GuC scheduling Matthew Brost
2021-07-09 23:53 ` John Harrison
2021-07-15 0:07 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/47] drm/i915/guc: Ensure G2H response has space in buffer Matthew Brost
2021-07-13 18:36 ` John Harrison
2021-07-15 0:06 ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-15 0:12 ` John Harrison
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/47] drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work with GuC Matthew Brost
2021-07-10 0:16 ` John Harrison
2021-07-10 3:55 ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-17 4:09 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/47] drm/i915/guc: Update GuC debugfs to support new GuC Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 18:05 ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 20:59 ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 21:37 ` John Harrison
2021-07-13 8:51 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-14 23:56 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/47] drm/i915/guc: Add several request trace points Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 18:08 ` John Harrison
2021-07-13 9:06 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-07-20 1:59 ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-22 13:55 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/47] drm/i915: Add intel_context tracing Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 18:10 ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 21:47 ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 21:51 ` John Harrison
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/47] drm/i915/guc: GuC virtual engines Matthew Brost
2021-07-15 1:21 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/47] drm/i915: Track 'serial' counts for " Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 18:11 ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 20:06 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/47] drm/i915: Hold reference to intel_context over life of i915_request Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 18:23 ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 20:05 ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 21:36 ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 21:48 ` John Harrison
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/47] drm/i915/guc: Disable bonding extension with GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 18:23 ` John Harrison
2021-06-24 7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/47] drm/i915/guc: Direct all breadcrumbs for a class to single breadcrumbs Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 19:19 ` John Harrison
2021-06-24 7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/47] drm/i915/guc: Reset implementation for new GuC interface Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 19:58 ` John Harrison
2021-07-15 0:53 ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-15 9:36 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-07-26 22:48 ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-27 8:56 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-07-27 18:30 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/47] drm/i915: Reset GPU immediately if submission is disabled Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 20:01 ` John Harrison
2021-06-24 7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 33/47] drm/i915/guc: Add disable interrupts to guc sanitize Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 20:11 ` John Harrison
2021-06-24 7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 34/47] drm/i915/guc: Suspend/resume implementation for new interface Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 22:56 ` John Harrison
2021-06-24 7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 35/47] drm/i915/guc: Handle context reset notification Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 22:58 ` John Harrison
2021-07-15 0:32 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 36/47] drm/i915/guc: Handle engine reset failure notification Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 22:59 ` John Harrison
2021-06-24 7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/47] drm/i915/guc: Enable the timer expired interrupt for GuC Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 23:00 ` John Harrison
2021-06-24 7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 38/47] drm/i915/guc: Provide mmio list to be saved/restored on engine reset Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 39/47] drm/i915/guc: Don't complain about reset races Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 15:55 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 40/47] drm/i915/guc: Enable GuC engine reset Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 16:19 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/47] drm/i915/guc: Capture error state on context reset Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 23:05 ` John Harrison
2021-06-24 7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/47] drm/i915/guc: Fix for error capture after full GPU reset with GuC Matthew Brost
2021-07-15 0:43 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 43/47] drm/i915/guc: Hook GuC scheduling policies up Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 0:59 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 19:10 ` John Harrison
2021-07-10 18:56 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 44/47] drm/i915/guc: Connect reset modparam updates to GuC policy flags Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 1:10 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 45/47] drm/i915/guc: Include scheduling policies in the debugfs state dump Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 16:34 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 46/47] drm/i915/guc: Add golden context to GuC ADS Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 47/47] drm/i915/guc: Unblock GuC submission on Gen11+ Matthew Brost
2021-06-30 8:22 ` Martin Peres
2021-06-30 18:00 ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-01 18:24 ` Martin Peres
2021-07-02 8:13 ` Martin Peres
2021-07-02 13:06 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-02 13:12 ` Martin Peres
2021-07-02 14:08 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-30 18:58 ` John Harrison
2021-07-01 8:14 ` Pekka Paalanen
2021-07-01 18:27 ` Martin Peres
2021-07-01 19:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-02 7:29 ` Pekka Paalanen
2021-07-02 8:09 ` Martin Peres
2021-07-02 15:07 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-03 8:21 ` Martin Peres
2021-07-07 0:57 ` John Harrison
2021-07-07 7:47 ` Pekka Paalanen
2021-07-07 10:11 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-15 0:49 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 7:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for GuC submission support Patchwork
2021-06-24 7:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-06-24 7:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-12 19:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for GuC submission support (rev2) Patchwork
2021-10-22 9:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/47] GuC submission support Joonas Lahtinen
2021-10-22 16:42 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-25 9:37 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2021-10-25 15:15 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-26 8:59 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2021-10-26 15:43 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-26 15:51 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-27 9:21 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2021-10-25 17:06 ` John Harrison
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1d250e86-1d2e-53b3-4ae1-ef126a05c617@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).