From: konrad.wilk@oracle.com (Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 04/30] xen/PCI: Don't use deprecated function pci_scan_bus_parented()
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:23:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150325192331.GG25884@l.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo69ytCxBK5AD79Nz05wy=GwzcOGV7WkiKFxpLDH4wtJXw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 09:26:08AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 08:24:58AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>> + pci_add_resource(&resources, &ioport_resource);
> >> >>>>> + pci_add_resource(&resources, &iomem_resource);
> >> >>>>> + pci_add_resource(&resources, &busn_resource);
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Since I don't want to export busn_resource, you might have to allocate your
> >> >>>> own struct resource for it here. And, of course, figure out the details of
> >> >>>> which PCI domain you're in and whether you need to share one struct
> >> >>>> resource across several host bridges in the same domain.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Allocate its own resource here is ok for me, as I mentioned in previous reply,
> >> >>> so do we still need to add additional info to figure out which domain own the bus resource ?
> >> >>
> >> >> That's up to the caller. Only the platform knows which bridges it wants to
> >> >> have in the same domain. In principle, every host bridge could be in its
> >> >> own domain, since each bridge is the root of a unique PCI hierarchy. But
> >> >> some platforms have firmware that assumes otherwise. I have no idea what
> >> >> xen assumes.
> >> >
> >> > I'm not xen guy, so I don't know much about it, but because it call pci_scan_bus_parented()
> >> > before, and in which busn_resource is always shared for different host bridges(same domain or not),
> >> > I think add a static bus resource(0,255) should be safe, at least, it would not introduce new risk.
> >> >
> >> > Something like:
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c b/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c
> >> > index b1ffebe..a69e529 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c
> >> > @@ -446,9 +446,15 @@ static int pcifront_scan_root(struct pcifront_device *pdev,
> >> > unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus)
> >> > {
> >> > struct pci_bus *b;
> >> > + LIST_HEAD(resources);
> >> > struct pcifront_sd *sd = NULL;
> >> > struct pci_bus_entry *bus_entry = NULL;
> >> > int err = 0;
> >> > + static struct resource busn_res = {
> >> > + .start = 0,
> >> > + .end = 255,
> >> > + .flags = IORESOURCE_BUS,
> >> > + };
> >> >
> >> > #ifndef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS
> >> > if (domain != 0) {
> >> > @@ -470,17 +476,21 @@ static int pcifront_scan_root(struct pcifront_device *pdev,
> >> > err = -ENOMEM;
> >> > goto err_out;
> >> > }
> >> > + pci_add_resource(&resources, &ioport_resource);
> >> > + pci_add_resource(&resources, &iomem_resource);
> >> > + pci_add_resource(&resources, &busn_res);
> >> > pcifront_init_sd(sd, domain, bus, pdev);
> >> >
> >> > pci_lock_rescan_remove();
> >> >
> >> > - b = pci_scan_bus_parented(&pdev->xdev->dev, bus,
> >> > - &pcifront_bus_ops, sd);
> >> > + b = pci_scan_root_bus(&pdev->xdev->dev, bus,
> >> > + &pcifront_bus_ops, sd, &resources);
> >> > if (!b) {
> >> >
> >> > Bjorn, what do you think about ?
> >>
> >> That seems OK to me. Probably still wrong, but no worse than it was before.
> >
> > Interesting. The mechanism for PCI passthrough can either synthesize
> > and PCI bus number starting at zero (so first device is always 0:0:0.0)
> > or it can replicate the backend PCI topology. That means you
> > could have segment values passed in, so: ab:ff:00.1). I've to admin
> > I hadn't tried the 'physical' replication on an machine with
> > domains (err, segments).
> >
> > Is there an git tree with this so I can just try it out?
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git
> pci/enumeration-yw6 has similar code (it exports the single
I presume now it is bjorn/pci/enumeration-yw8 ? Going to test this out
this week.
> busn_resource and makes xen use it). That should be functionally
> identical to what v4.0-rc1 does.
>
> Yijing hasn't posted the static busn_res proposal above yet, so I
> don't have a branch with that in it.
>
> Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-25 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-09 2:33 [PATCH v6 00/30] Refine PCI scan interfaces and make generic pci host bridge Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:33 ` [PATCH v6 01/30] PCI: Rip out pci_bus_add_devices() from pci_scan_bus() Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:33 ` [PATCH v6 02/30] PCI: Rip out pci_bus_add_devices() from pci_scan_root_bus() Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 03/30] PCI: Export busn_resource to drivers/pci Yijing Wang
2015-03-11 22:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-12 11:42 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-12 19:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-13 1:57 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 04/30] xen/PCI: Don't use deprecated function pci_scan_bus_parented() Yijing Wang
2015-03-11 22:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-12 11:46 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-12 19:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-13 2:36 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-13 13:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-13 14:01 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-03-13 14:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-25 19:23 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2015-03-26 1:18 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-26 7:30 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 05/30] PCI: Remove deprecated pci_scan_bus_parented() Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 06/30] PCI: Combine PCI domain and bus number in u32 arg Yijing Wang
2015-03-12 1:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-12 12:14 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-12 19:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-13 3:19 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 07/30] PCI: Pass PCI domain number combined with root bus number Yijing Wang
2015-03-12 1:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-12 12:20 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-17 5:15 ` [Xen-devel] " Manish Jaggi
2015-03-17 14:05 ` Ian Campbell
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 08/30] PCI: Introduce pci_host_assign_domain_nr() to assign domain Yijing Wang
2015-03-12 1:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-12 12:23 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 09/30] PCI: Separate pci_host_bridge creation out of pci_create_root_bus() Yijing Wang
2015-03-12 3:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-12 13:44 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-21 23:21 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-03-23 1:08 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 10/30] PCI: Introduce pci_host_bridge_list to manage host bridges Yijing Wang
2015-03-12 2:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-12 13:03 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-12 19:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-13 3:28 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-13 14:33 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-16 1:28 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 11/30] PCI: Save sysdata in pci_host_bridge drvdata Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 12/30] PCI: Introduce pci_host_bridge_ops to support host specific operations Yijing Wang
2015-03-12 3:23 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-12 13:14 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 13/30] PCI: Introduce new scan function pci_scan_host_bridge() Yijing Wang
2015-03-12 3:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-12 13:15 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 14/30] x86/PCI: Refine pci_acpi_scan_root() with generic pci_host_bridge Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 15/30] ia64/PCI: " Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 16/30] powerpc/pci: Rename pcibios_root_bridge_prepare() Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 17/30] powerpc/pci: Use pci_scan_host_bridge() for simplicity Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 18/30] PCI: Remove weak pcibios_root_bridge_prepare() Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 19/30] sparc/PCI: Claim bus resources before pci_bus_add_devices() Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 20/30] sparc/PCI: Use pci_scan_host_bridge() for simplicity Yijing Wang
2015-03-12 3:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-12 13:17 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 21/30] PCI: Introduce pci_bus_child_max_busnr() Yijing Wang
2015-03-12 3:33 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-12 13:24 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-12 3:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-12 13:28 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-12 20:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 22/30] parisc/PCI: Use pci_scan_root_bus() for simplicity Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 23/30] PCI/mvebu: Use pci_common_init_dev() to simplify code Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 24/30] PCI/tegra: Remove redundant tegra_pcie_scan_bus() Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 25/30] PCI/designware: Use pci_scan_root_bus() for simplicity Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 26/30] PCI/xgene: Use pci_scan_root_bus() instead of pci_create_root_bus() Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 27/30] PCI: Rename __pci_create_root_bus() to pci_create_root_bus() Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 28/30] PCI: Export find_pci_host_bridge() and rename to pci_find_host_bridge() Yijing Wang
2015-03-12 3:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-12 13:29 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 29/30] PCI: Remove platform specific pci_domain_nr() Yijing Wang
2015-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v6 30/30] PCI: Remove pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() Yijing Wang
2015-03-12 3:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-12 13:32 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-12 21:23 ` [PATCH v6 00/30] Refine PCI scan interfaces and make generic pci host bridge Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-13 3:29 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-13 11:31 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-03-13 14:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-16 1:31 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-16 1:48 ` Yijing Wang
2015-03-17 10:55 ` Liviu Dudau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150325192331.GG25884@l.oracle.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).