From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, x86@kernel.org
Cc: iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] x86/irq: Add x86_non_ir_cpumask
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 08:25:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3bc0d6d001b276f881310714fb59ea03ac0e5173.camel@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ft6r58vy.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2494 bytes --]
On Tue, 2020-10-06 at 23:42 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05 2020 at 16:28, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
> >
> > This is the mask of CPUs to which IRQs can be delivered without
> > interrupt
> > remapping.
> >
> > +/* Mask of CPUs which can be targeted by non-remapped interrupts.
> > */
> > +cpumask_t x86_non_ir_cpumask = { CPU_BITS_ALL };
>
> What?
By default, if we didn't hit any limits, all CPUs can be targeted by
external interrupts. It's the default today.
Or at least we pretend it is, modulo the bugs :)
> > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -1838,6 +1841,7 @@ static __init void x2apic_enable(void)
> > static __init void try_to_enable_x2apic(int remap_mode)
> > {
> > u32 apic_limit = 0;
> > + int i;
> >
> > if (x2apic_state == X2APIC_DISABLED)
> > return;
> > @@ -1880,6 +1884,14 @@ static __init void try_to_enable_x2apic(int remap_mode)
> > if (apic_limit)
> > x2apic_set_max_apicid(apic_limit);
> >
> > + /* Build the affinity mask for interrupts that can't be remapped. */
> > + cpumask_clear(&x86_non_ir_cpumask);
> > + i = min_t(unsigned int, num_possible_cpus() - 1, apic_limit);
> > + for ( ; i >= 0; i--) {
> > + if (cpu_physical_id(i) <= apic_limit)
> > + cpumask_set_cpu(i, &x86_non_ir_cpumask);
> > + }
>
> Blink. If the APIC id is not linear with the cpu numbers then this
> results in a reduced addressable set of CPUs. WHY?
Hm, good question. That loop was cargo-culted from hyperv-iommu.c;
perhaps it makes more sense there because Hyper-V really does promise
that linearity, or perhaps it was already buggy. Will fix.
In fact, in apic.c I could probably just use the cpuid_to_apicid array
which is right there in the file.
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> > index aa9a3b54a96c..4d0ef46fedb9 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> > @@ -2098,6 +2098,8 @@ static int mp_alloc_timer_irq(int ioapic, int pin)
> > struct irq_alloc_info info;
> >
> > ioapic_set_alloc_attr(&info, NUMA_NO_NODE, 0, 0);
> > + if (domain->parent == x86_vector_domain)
> > + info.mask = &x86_non_ir_cpumask;
>
> We are not going to sprinkle such domain checks all over the
> place. Again, the mask is a property of the interrupt domain.
Yeah, that's a hangover from the first attempts which I forgot to
delete.
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5174 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-07 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-05 15:28 [PATCH 0/13] Fix per-domain IRQ affinity, allow >255 CPUs on x86 without IRQ remapping David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 01/13] x86/apic: Use x2apic in guest kernels even with unusable CPUs David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 02/13] x86/msi: Only use high bits of MSI address for DMAR unit David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 20:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 03/13] x86/ioapic: Handle Extended Destination ID field in RTE David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 04/13] x86/apic: Support 15 bits of APIC ID in IOAPIC/MSI where available David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 05/13] genirq: Prepare for default affinity to be passed to __irq_alloc_descs() David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-06 21:07 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 06/13] genirq: Add default_affinity argument " David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 07/13] irqdomain: Add max_affinity argument to irq_domain_alloc_descs() David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 7:19 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 13:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 14:10 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 15:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 16:11 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 20:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-08 7:21 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-08 9:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-08 11:10 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-08 12:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-09 7:54 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 08/13] genirq: Add irq_domain_set_affinity() David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 7:22 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 09/13] x86/irq: Add x86_non_ir_cpumask David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 7:25 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 10/13] x86/irq: Limit IOAPIC and MSI domains' affinity without IR David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 7:48 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 12:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 13:08 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 14:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 14:23 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 16:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 16:15 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 15:05 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 15:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 15:46 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 17:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 17:34 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 11/13] x86/smp: Allow more than 255 CPUs even without interrupt remapping David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 12/13] iommu/irq_remapping: Kill most of hyperv-iommu.c now it's redundant David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 13/13] x86/kvm: Add KVM_FEATURE_MSI_EXT_DEST_ID David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 8:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-07 8:59 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 11:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-07 12:04 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3bc0d6d001b276f881310714fb59ea03ac0e5173.camel@infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).