linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
To: zohar@linux.ibm.com, stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com,
	casey@schaufler-ca.com, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com,
	gmazyland@gmail.com, paul@paul-moore.com
Cc: tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com, sashal@kernel.org,
	jmorris@namei.org, nramas@linux.microsoft.com,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v10 2/8] IMA: add support to measure buffer data hash
Date: Thu,  7 Jan 2021 20:07:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210108040708.8389-3-tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210108040708.8389-1-tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>

The original IMA buffer data measurement sizes were small (e.g.  boot
command line), but the new buffer data measurement use cases have data 
sizes that are a lot larger.  Just as IMA measures the file data hash,
not the file data, IMA should similarly support the option for measuring 
buffer data hash.

Introduce a boolean parameter to support measuring buffer data hash,
which would be much smaller, instead of the buffer itself.

Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima.h                 |  3 +-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c        |  2 +-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c |  2 +-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c            | 29 ++++++++++++++++----
 security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c      |  3 +-
 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index e5622ce8cbb1..0b4634515839 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -268,7 +268,8 @@ void ima_store_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file,
 			   struct ima_template_desc *template_desc);
 void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size,
 				const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func,
-				int pcr, const char *func_data);
+				int pcr, const char *func_data,
+				bool buf_hash);
 void ima_audit_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
 			   const unsigned char *filename);
 int ima_alloc_init_template(struct ima_event_data *event_data,
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
index 8361941ee0a1..46ffa38bab12 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ int ima_check_blacklist(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
 		if ((rc == -EPERM) && (iint->flags & IMA_MEASURE))
 			process_buffer_measurement(NULL, digest, digestsize,
 						   "blacklisted-hash", NONE,
-						   pcr, NULL);
+						   pcr, NULL, false);
 	}
 
 	return rc;
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c
index 1c68c500c26f..a74095793936 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c
@@ -60,5 +60,5 @@ void ima_post_key_create_or_update(struct key *keyring, struct key *key,
 	 */
 	process_buffer_measurement(NULL, payload, payload_len,
 				   keyring->description, KEY_CHECK, 0,
-				   keyring->description);
+				   keyring->description, false);
 }
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index b4ed611cd2a4..494fb964497d 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ int ima_post_load_data(char *buf, loff_t size,
 }
 
 /*
- * process_buffer_measurement - Measure the buffer to ima log.
+ * process_buffer_measurement - Measure the buffer or the buffer data hash
  * @inode: inode associated with the object being measured (NULL for KEY_CHECK)
  * @buf: pointer to the buffer that needs to be added to the log.
  * @size: size of buffer(in bytes).
@@ -787,12 +787,14 @@ int ima_post_load_data(char *buf, loff_t size,
  * @func: IMA hook
  * @pcr: pcr to extend the measurement
  * @func_data: func specific data, may be NULL
+ * @buf_hash: measure buffer data hash
  *
- * Based on policy, the buffer is measured into the ima log.
+ * Based on policy, either the buffer data or buffer data hash is measured
  */
 void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size,
 				const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func,
-				int pcr, const char *func_data)
+				int pcr, const char *func_data,
+				bool buf_hash)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 	const char *audit_cause = "ENOMEM";
@@ -807,6 +809,8 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size,
 		struct ima_digest_data hdr;
 		char digest[IMA_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE];
 	} hash = {};
+	char digest_hash[IMA_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE];
+	int digest_hash_len = hash_digest_size[ima_hash_algo];
 	int violation = 0;
 	int action = 0;
 	u32 secid;
@@ -849,13 +853,27 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	if (buf_hash) {
+		memcpy(digest_hash, hash.hdr.digest, digest_hash_len);
+
+		ret = ima_calc_buffer_hash(digest_hash, digest_hash_len,
+					   iint.ima_hash);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			audit_cause = "hashing_error";
+			goto out;
+		}
+
+		event_data.buf = digest_hash;
+		event_data.buf_len = digest_hash_len;
+	}
+
 	ret = ima_alloc_init_template(&event_data, &entry, template);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		audit_cause = "alloc_entry";
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	ret = ima_store_template(entry, violation, NULL, buf, pcr);
+	ret = ima_store_template(entry, violation, NULL, event_data.buf, pcr);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		audit_cause = "store_entry";
 		ima_free_template_entry(entry);
@@ -890,7 +908,8 @@ void ima_kexec_cmdline(int kernel_fd, const void *buf, int size)
 		return;
 
 	process_buffer_measurement(file_inode(f.file), buf, size,
-				   "kexec-cmdline", KEXEC_CMDLINE, 0, NULL);
+				   "kexec-cmdline", KEXEC_CMDLINE, 0, NULL,
+				   false);
 	fdput(f);
 }
 
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c
index 69a8626a35c0..c2f2ad34f9b7 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c
@@ -162,7 +162,8 @@ void ima_process_queued_keys(void)
 						   entry->payload_len,
 						   entry->keyring_name,
 						   KEY_CHECK, 0,
-						   entry->keyring_name);
+						   entry->keyring_name,
+						   false);
 		list_del(&entry->list);
 		ima_free_key_entry(entry);
 	}
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-08  4:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-08  4:07 [PATCH v10 0/8] IMA: support for measuring kernel integrity critical data Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07 ` [PATCH v10 1/8] IMA: generalize keyring specific measurement constructs Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07 ` Tushar Sugandhi [this message]
2021-01-08  4:07 ` [PATCH v10 3/8] IMA: define a hook to measure kernel integrity critical data Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07 ` [PATCH v10 4/8] IMA: add policy rule to measure " Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07 ` [PATCH v10 5/8] IMA: limit critical data measurement based on a label Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-14  2:09   ` Mimi Zohar
2021-01-14 17:57     ` Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07 ` [PATCH v10 6/8] IMA: extend critical data hook to limit the " Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07 ` [PATCH v10 7/8] IMA: define a builtin critical data measurement policy Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07 ` [PATCH v10 8/8] selinux: include a consumer of the new IMA critical data hook Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-12 16:27   ` Paul Moore
2021-01-12 18:25     ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-01-13 19:13     ` Mimi Zohar
2021-01-13 19:19       ` Paul Moore
2021-01-13 21:11         ` Mimi Zohar
2021-01-13 22:10           ` Paul Moore
2021-01-13 23:10             ` Mimi Zohar
2021-01-14  2:40               ` Paul Moore
2021-01-14  2:49                 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-01-14 16:22                   ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-01-14 16:44                     ` Mimi Zohar
2021-01-14 16:50                       ` Mimi Zohar
2021-01-14 17:48                         ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-01-14 19:21                           ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-01-14 16:51                       ` Paul Moore
2021-01-15 12:54 ` [PATCH v10 0/8] IMA: support for measuring kernel integrity critical data Mimi Zohar
2021-01-15 17:26   ` Tushar Sugandhi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210108040708.8389-3-tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=gmazyland@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).