From: brendanhiggins@google.com (Brendan Higgins)
Subject: [RFC v3 14/19] Documentation: kunit: add documentation for KUnit
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 16:17:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFd5g46cO_rZYjqKu6CooKcV-uAsCUJjuib38cQv6WHQS3ooaA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190214001713.f5Q7fEeh9oyJfxaWCdXmyLdqJAf3Bo_ynW0zxYJHRyE@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eade3052-0aa4-90b4-d55b-8c44556f98bc@ideasonboard.com>
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 1:55 PM Kieran Bingham
<kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Brendan,
>
> On 12/02/2019 22:10, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 4:16 AM Kieran Bingham
> > <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Brendan,
> >>
> >> On 09/02/2019 00:56, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 4:16 AM Kieran Bingham
> >>> <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Brendan,
> >>>>
> >>>> On 03/12/2018 23:53, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018@7:45 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018@01:56:37PM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi Brendan,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Please excuse the top posting, but I'm replying here as I'm following
> >>>>>>> the section "Creating a kunitconfig" in Documentation/kunit/start.rst.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Could the three line kunitconfig file live under say
> >>>>>>> arch/um/configs/kunit_defconfig?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Further consideration to this topic - I mentioned putting it in
> >>>> arch/um/configs
> >>>>
> >>>> - but I think this is wrong.
> >>>>
> >>>> We now have a location for config-fragments, which is essentially what
> >>>> this is, under kernel/configs
> >>>>
> >>>> So perhaps an addition as :
> >>>>
> >>>> kernel/configs/kunit.config
> >>>>
> >>>> Would be more appropriate - and less (UM) architecture specific.
> >>>
> >>> Sorry for the long radio silence.
> >>>
> >>> I just got around to doing this and I found that there are some
> >>> configs that are desirable to have when running KUnit under x86 in a
> >>> VM, but not UML.
> >>
> >> Should this behaviour you mention be handled by the KCONFIG depends flags?
> >>
> >> depends on (KUMIT & UML)
> >> or
> >> depends on (KUNIT & !UML)
> >>
> >> or such?
> >
> > Not really. Anything that is strictly necessary to run KUnit on an
> > architectures should of course be turned on as a dependency like you
> > suggest, but I am talking about stuff that you would probably want to
> > get yourself going, but is by no means necessary.
> >
> >>
> >> An example of which configs you are referring to would help to
> >> understand the issue perhaps.
> >>
> >
> > For example, you might want to enable a serial console that is known
> > to work with a fairly generic qemu setup when building for x86:
> > CONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y
> > CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y
> >
> > Obviously not a dependency, and not even particularly useful to people
> > who know what they are doing, but to someone who is new or just wants
> > something to work out of the box would probably want that.
>
> It sounds like that would be a config fragment for qemu ?
>
> Although - perhaps this is already covered by the following fragment:
> kernel/configs/kvm_guest.config
>
Oh, yep, you are right. Does that mean we should bother at all with a defconfig?
Luis, I know you said you wanted one. I am thinking just stick with
the UML one? The downside there is we then get stuck having to
maintain the fragment and the defconfig. I right now (in the new
revision I am working on) have the Python kunit_tool copy the
defconfig if no kunitconfig is provided and a flag is set. It would be
pretty straightforward to make it merge in the fragment instead.
All that being said, I think I am going to drop the arch/x86
defconfig, since I think we all agree that it is not very useful, but
keep the UML defconfig and the fragment. That will at least given
something concrete to discuss.
>
> >>> So should we have one that goes in with
> >>> config-fragments and others that go into architectures? Another idea,
> >>> it would be nice to have a KUnit config that runs all known tests
> >>
> >> This might also be a config option added to the tests directly like
> >> COMPILE_TEST perhaps?
> >
> > That just allows a bunch of drivers to be compiled, it does not
> > actually go through and turn the configs on, right? I mean, there is
> > no a priori way to know that there is a configuration which spans all
> > possible options available under COMPILE_TEST, right? Maybe I
> > misunderstand what you are suggesting...
>
> Bah - you're right of course. I was mis-remembering the functionality of
> COMPILE_TEST as if it were some sort of 'select' but it's just an enable..
>
> Sorry for the confusion.
>
No problem, I thought for a second that was a good example too (and I
wish it were. It would make my life so much easier!). I remember
getting emails with a COMPILE_TEST config attached that demonstrates
an invalid build caused by my changes, presumably that email bot just
tries random configs with a new change until it finds one that breaks.
>
> >> (Not sure what that would be called though ... KUNIT_RUNTIME_TEST?)
> >>
> >> I think that might be more maintainable as otherwise each new test would
> >> have to modify the {min,def}{config,fragment} ...
> >>
> >
> > Looking at kselftest-merge, they just start out with a set of
> > fragments in which the union should contain all tests and then merge
> > it with a base .config (probably intended to be $(ARCH)_defconfig).
> > However, I don't know if that is the state of the art.
> >
> >>
> >>> (this probably won't work in practice once we start testing mutually
> >>> exclusive things or things with lots of ifdeffery, but it probably
> >>> something we should try to maintain as best as we can?); this probably
> >>> shouldn't go in with the fragments, right?
> >>
> >> Sounds like we agree there :)
> >
> > Totally. Long term we will need something a lot more sophisticated
> > than anything under discussion here. I was talking about this with
> > Luis on another thread:
> > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/kunit-dev/EQ1x0SzrUus (feel
> > free to chime in!). Nevertheless, that's a really hard problem and I
> > figure some variant of defconfigs and config fragments will work well
> > enough until we reach that point.
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I will be sending another revision out soon, but I figured I might be
> >>> able to catch you before I did so.
> >>
> >> Thanks for thinking of me.
> >
> > How can I forget? You have been super helpful!
> >
> >> I hope I managed to reply in time to help and not hinder your progress.
> >
> > Yep, no trouble at all. You are the one helping me :-)
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
>
> --
> Regards
> --
> Kieran
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-14 0:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 232+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-28 19:36 [RFC v3 00/19] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 01/19] kunit: test: add KUnit test runner core brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-30 3:14 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:14 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-01 1:51 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-01 1:51 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-01 2:57 ` mcgrof
2018-12-01 2:57 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-05 13:15 ` anton.ivanov
2018-12-05 13:15 ` Anton Ivanov
2018-12-05 14:45 ` arnd
2018-12-05 14:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-12-05 14:49 ` anton.ivanov
2018-12-05 14:49 ` Anton Ivanov
2018-11-30 3:28 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:28 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-01 2:08 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-01 2:08 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-01 3:10 ` mcgrof
2018-12-01 3:10 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 22:47 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 22:47 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-01 3:02 ` mcgrof
2018-12-01 3:02 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 02/19] kunit: test: add test resource management API brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 03/19] kunit: test: add string_stream a std::stream like string builder brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-30 3:29 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:29 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-01 2:14 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-01 2:14 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-01 3:12 ` mcgrof
2018-12-01 3:12 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 10:55 ` pmladek
2018-12-03 10:55 ` Petr Mladek
2018-12-04 0:35 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-04 0:35 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 04/19] kunit: test: add test_stream a std::stream like logger brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 05/19] kunit: test: add the concept of expectations brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 06/19] arch: um: enable running kunit from User Mode Linux brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 21:26 ` robh
2018-11-28 21:26 ` Rob Herring
2018-11-30 3:37 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:37 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-11-30 14:05 ` robh
2018-11-30 14:05 ` Rob Herring
2018-11-30 18:22 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 18:22 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 23:22 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 23:22 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-30 3:30 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:30 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 07/19] kunit: test: add initial tests brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-30 3:40 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:40 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 23:26 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 23:26 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-03 23:43 ` mcgrof
2018-12-03 23:43 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 08/19] arch: um: add shim to trap to allow installing a fault catcher for tests brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-30 3:34 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:34 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 23:34 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 23:34 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-03 23:46 ` mcgrof
2018-12-03 23:46 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-04 0:44 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-04 0:44 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-30 3:41 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:41 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 23:37 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 23:37 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 09/19] kunit: test: add the concept of assertions brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 10/19] kunit: test: add test managed resource tests brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 11/19] kunit: add Python libraries for handing KUnit config and kernel brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-29 13:54 ` kieran.bingham
2018-11-29 13:54 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-12-03 23:48 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 23:48 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-04 20:47 ` mcgrof
2018-12-04 20:47 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-06 12:32 ` kieran.bingham
2018-12-06 12:32 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-12-06 15:37 ` willy
2018-12-06 15:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-07 11:30 ` kieran.bingham
2018-12-07 11:30 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-12-11 14:09 ` pmladek
2018-12-11 14:09 ` Petr Mladek
2018-12-11 14:41 ` rostedt
2018-12-11 14:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-12-11 17:01 ` anton.ivanov
2018-12-11 17:01 ` Anton Ivanov
2019-02-09 0:40 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-09 0:40 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-07 1:05 ` mcgrof
2018-12-07 1:05 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-07 18:35 ` kent.overstreet
2018-12-07 18:35 ` Kent Overstreet
2018-11-30 3:44 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:44 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 23:50 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 23:50 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-04 20:48 ` mcgrof
2018-12-04 20:48 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 12/19] kunit: add KUnit wrapper script and simple output parser brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 13/19] kunit: improve output from python wrapper brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 14/19] Documentation: kunit: add documentation for KUnit brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-29 13:56 ` kieran.bingham
2018-11-29 13:56 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-11-30 3:45 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:45 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 23:53 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 23:53 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-06 12:16 ` kieran.bingham
2018-12-06 12:16 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-02-09 0:56 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-09 0:56 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-11 12:16 ` kieran.bingham
2019-02-11 12:16 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-02-12 22:10 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-12 22:10 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-13 21:55 ` kieran.bingham
2019-02-13 21:55 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-02-14 0:17 ` brendanhiggins [this message]
2019-02-14 0:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-14 17:26 ` mcgrof
2019-02-14 17:26 ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-02-14 22:07 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-14 22:07 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 15/19] MAINTAINERS: add entry for KUnit the unit testing framework brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 16/19] arch: um: make UML unflatten device tree when testing brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 21:16 ` robh
2018-11-28 21:16 ` Rob Herring
2018-12-04 0:00 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-04 0:00 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-30 3:46 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:46 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-04 0:02 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-04 0:02 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 17/19] of: unittest: migrate tests to run on KUnit brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
[not found] ` <CAL_Jsq+09Kx7yMBC_Jw45QGmk6U_fp4N6HOZDwYrM4tWw+_dOA@mail.gmail.com>
2018-11-30 0:39 ` rdunlap
2018-11-30 0:39 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-12-04 0:13 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-04 0:13 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-04 13:40 ` robh
2018-12-04 13:40 ` Rob Herring
2018-12-05 23:42 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-05 23:42 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-07 0:41 ` robh
2018-12-07 0:41 ` Rob Herring
2018-12-04 0:08 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-04 0:08 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-13 1:44 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-13 1:44 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-14 20:10 ` robh
2019-02-14 20:10 ` Rob Herring
2019-02-14 21:52 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-14 21:52 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-18 22:56 ` frowand.list
2019-02-18 22:56 ` Frank Rowand
2019-02-28 0:29 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-28 0:29 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-04 10:56 ` frowand.list
2018-12-04 10:56 ` Frank Rowand
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 18/19] of: unittest: split out a couple of test cases from unittest brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-04 10:58 ` frowand.list
2018-12-04 10:58 ` Frank Rowand
2018-12-05 23:54 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-05 23:54 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-14 23:57 ` frowand.list
2019-02-14 23:57 ` Frank Rowand
2019-02-15 0:56 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-15 0:56 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-15 2:05 ` frowand.list
2019-02-15 2:05 ` Frank Rowand
2019-02-15 10:56 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-15 10:56 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-18 22:25 ` frowand.list
2019-02-18 22:25 ` Frank Rowand
2019-02-20 20:44 ` frowand.list
2019-02-20 20:44 ` Frank Rowand
2019-02-20 20:47 ` frowand.list
2019-02-20 20:47 ` Frank Rowand
2019-02-28 3:52 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-28 3:52 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-03-22 0:22 ` frowand.list
2019-03-22 0:22 ` Frank Rowand
2019-03-22 1:30 ` brendanhiggins
2019-03-22 1:30 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-03-22 1:47 ` frowand.list
2019-03-22 1:47 ` Frank Rowand
2019-03-25 22:15 ` brendanhiggins
2019-03-25 22:15 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-09-20 16:57 ` Rob Herring
2019-09-21 23:57 ` Frank Rowand
2019-03-22 1:34 ` frowand.list
2019-03-22 1:34 ` Frank Rowand
2019-03-25 22:18 ` brendanhiggins
2019-03-25 22:18 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 19/19] of: unittest: split up some super large test cases brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-04 10:52 ` [RFC v3 00/19] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework frowand.list
2018-12-04 10:52 ` Frank Rowand
2018-12-04 11:40 ` frowand.list
2018-12-04 11:40 ` Frank Rowand
2018-12-04 13:49 ` robh
2018-12-04 13:49 ` Rob Herring
2018-12-05 23:10 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-05 23:10 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-03-22 0:27 ` frowand.list
2019-03-22 0:27 ` Frank Rowand
2019-03-25 22:04 ` brendanhiggins
2019-03-25 22:04 ` Brendan Higgins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFd5g46cO_rZYjqKu6CooKcV-uAsCUJjuib38cQv6WHQS3ooaA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=brendanhiggins@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).