From: frowand.list@gmail.com (Frank Rowand)
Subject: [RFC v3 18/19] of: unittest: split out a couple of test cases from unittest
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:47:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af11bb26-6f7e-393a-5109-0c33cdab6b42@gmail.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190220204720.nC7FY-9I5YaLVKg0IbC5rTLrMaBtQHw-9EZe8AgWTHc@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <72cd1c5b-6f68-73ad-c8fd-f3a3268a0529@gmail.com>
On 2/20/19 12:44 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 2/18/19 2:25 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 2/15/19 2:56 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019@6:05 PM Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2/14/19 4:56 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019@3:57 PM Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/5/18 3:54 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018@2:58 AM Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>
> < snip >
>
>>
>> It makes it harder for me to read the source of the tests and
>> understand the order they will execute. It also makes it harder
>> for me to read through the actual tests (in this example the
>> tests that are currently grouped in of_unittest_find_node_by_name())
>> because of all the extra function headers injected into the
>> existing single function to break it apart into many smaller
>> functions.
>
> < snip >
>
>>>>> This is not something I feel particularly strongly about, it is just
>>>>> pretty atypical from my experience to have so many unrelated test
>>>>> cases in a single file.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe you would prefer that I break up the test cases first, and then
>>>>> we split up the file as appropriate?
>>>>
>>>> I prefer that the test cases not be broken up arbitrarily. There _may_
>
> I expect that I created confusion by putting this in a reply to patch 18/19.
> It is actually a comment about patch 19/19. Sorry about that.
>
>
>>>
>>> I wasn't trying to break them up arbitrarily. I thought I was doing it
>>> according to a pattern (breaking up the file, that is), but maybe I
>>> just hadn't looked at enough examples.
>>
>> This goes back to the kunit model of putting each test into a separate
>> function that can be a KUNIT_CASE(). That is a model that I do not agree
>> with for devicetree.
>
> So now that I am actually talking about patch 19/19, let me give a concrete
> example. I will cut and paste (after my comments), the beginning portion
> of base-test.c, after applying patch 19/19 (the "base version". Then I
> will cut and paste my alternative version which does not break the tests
> down into individual functions (the "frank version").
>
> I will also reply to this email with the base version and the frank version
> as attachments, which will make it easier to save as separate versions
> for easier viewing. I'm not sure if an email with attachments will make
> it through the list servers, but I am cautiously optimistic.
base_version and frank_version attached.
-Frank
>
> I am using v4 of the patch series because I never got v3 to cleanly apply
> and it is not a constructive use of my time to do so since I have v4 applied.
>
> One of the points I was trying to make is that readability suffers from the
> approach taken by patches 18/19 and 19/19.
>
> The base version contains the extra text of a function header for each
> unit test. This is visual noise and makes the file larger. It is also
> one more possible location of an error (although not likely).
>
> The frank version has converted each of the new function headers into
> a comment, using the function name with '_' converted to ' '. The
> comments are more readable than the function headers. Note that I added
> an extra blank line before each comment, which violates the kernel
> coding standards, but I feel this makes the code more readable.
>
> The base version needs to declare each of the individual test functions
> in of_test_find_node_by_name_cases[]. It is possible that a test function
> could be left out of of_test_find_node_by_name_cases[], in error. This
> will result in a compile warning (I think warning instead of error, but
> I have not verified that) so the error might be caught or it might be
> overlooked.
>
> In the base version, the order of execution of the test code requires
> bouncing back and forth between the test functions and the coding of
> of_test_find_node_by_name_cases[].
>
> In the frank version the order of execution of the test code is obvious.
>
> It is possible that a test function could be left out of
> of_test_find_node_by_name_cases[], in error. This will result in a compile
> warning (I think warning instead of error, but I have not verified that)
> so it might be caught or it might be overlooked.
>
> The base version is 265 lines. The frank version is 208 lines, 57 lines
> less. Less is better.
>
>
> ## ========== base version ====================================
>
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> /*
> * Unit tests for functions defined in base.c.
> */
> #include <linux/of.h>
>
> #include <kunit/test.h>
>
> #include "test-common.h"
>
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_basic(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct device_node *np;
> const char *name;
>
> np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data");
> name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "/testcase-data", name,
> "find /testcase-data failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
> kfree(name);
> }
>
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_trailing_slash(struct kunit *test)
> {
> /* Test if trailing '/' works */
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/"), NULL,
> "trailing '/' on /testcase-data/ should fail\n");
>
> }
>
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct device_node *np;
> const char *name;
>
> np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a");
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(
> test, "/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a", name,
> "find /testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
> kfree(name);
> }
>
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct device_node *np;
> const char *name;
>
> np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias");
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "/testcase-data", name,
> "find testcase-alias failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
> kfree(name);
> }
>
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias_and_slash(struct kunit *test)
> {
> /* Test if trailing '/' works on aliases */
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/"), NULL,
> "trailing '/' on testcase-alias/ should fail\n");
> }
>
> /*
> * TODO(brendanhiggins at google.com): This looks like a duplicate of
> * of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components
> */
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components_2(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct device_node *np;
> const char *name;
>
> np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/phandle-tests/consumer-a");
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(
> test, "/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a", name,
> "find testcase-alias/phandle-tests/consumer-a failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
> kfree(name);
> }
>
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_path(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct device_node *np;
>
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(
> test,
> np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/missing-path"), NULL,
> "non-existent path returned node %pOF\n", np);
> of_node_put(np);
> }
>
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct device_node *np;
>
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(
> test, np = of_find_node_by_path("missing-alias"), NULL,
> "non-existent alias returned node %pOF\n", np);
> of_node_put(np);
> }
>
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias_with_relative_path(
> struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct device_node *np;
>
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(
> test,
> np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/missing-path"), NULL,
> "non-existent alias with relative path returned node %pOF\n",
> np);
> of_node_put(np);
> }
>
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct device_node *np;
> const char *options;
>
> np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:testoption", &options);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "testoption", options,
> "option path test failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
> }
>
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_and_slash(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct device_node *np;
> const char *options;
>
> np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:test/option", &options);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/option", options,
> "option path test, subcase #1 failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
>
> np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data/testcase-device1:test/option", &options);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/option", options,
> "option path test, subcase #2 failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
> }
>
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct device_node *np;
>
> np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:testoption", NULL);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, np,
> "NULL option path test failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
> }
>
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct device_node *np;
> const char *options;
>
> np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:testaliasoption",
> &options);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "testaliasoption", options,
> "option alias path test failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
> }
>
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias_and_slash(
> struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct device_node *np;
> const char *options;
>
> np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:test/alias/option",
> &options);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/alias/option", options,
> "option alias path test, subcase #1 failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
> }
>
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option_alias(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct device_node *np;
>
> np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:testaliasoption", NULL);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(
> test, np, "NULL option alias path test failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
> }
>
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct device_node *np;
> const char *options;
>
> options = "testoption";
> np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias", &options);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, options, NULL,
> "option clearing test failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
> }
>
> static void of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing_root(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct device_node *np;
> const char *options;
>
> options = "testoption";
> np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/", &options);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, options, NULL,
> "option clearing root node test failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
> }
>
> static int of_test_find_node_by_name_init(struct kunit *test)
> {
> /* adding data for unittest */
> KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, unittest_data_add());
>
> if (!of_aliases)
> of_aliases = of_find_node_by_path("/aliases");
>
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, of_find_node_by_path(
> "/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a"));
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> static struct kunit_case of_test_find_node_by_name_cases[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_basic),
> KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_trailing_slash),
> KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components),
> KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias),
> KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias_and_slash),
> KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components_2),
> KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_path),
> KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias),
> KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias_with_relative_path),
> KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option),
> KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_and_slash),
> KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option),
> KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias),
> KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias_and_slash),
> KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option_alias),
> KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing),
> KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing_root),
> {},
> };
>
> static struct kunit_module of_test_find_node_by_name_module = {
> .name = "of-test-find-node-by-name",
> .init = of_test_find_node_by_name_init,
> .test_cases = of_test_find_node_by_name_cases,
> };
> module_test(of_test_find_node_by_name_module);
>
>
> ## ========== frank version ===================================
>
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> /*
> * Unit tests for functions defined in base.c.
> */
> #include <linux/of.h>
>
> #include <kunit/test.h>
>
> #include "test-common.h"
>
> static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct device_node *np;
> const char *options, *name;
>
>
> // find node by name basic
>
> np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data");
> name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "/testcase-data", name,
> "find /testcase-data failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
> kfree(name);
>
>
> // find node by name trailing slash
>
> /* Test if trailing '/' works */
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/"), NULL,
> "trailing '/' on /testcase-data/ should fail\n");
>
>
> // find node by name multiple components
>
> np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a");
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(
> test, "/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a", name,
> "find /testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
> kfree(name);
>
>
> // find node by name with alias
>
> np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias");
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "/testcase-data", name,
> "find testcase-alias failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
> kfree(name);
>
>
> // find node by name with alias and slash
>
> /* Test if trailing '/' works on aliases */
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/"), NULL,
> "trailing '/' on testcase-alias/ should fail\n");
>
>
> // find node by name multiple components 2
>
> np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/phandle-tests/consumer-a");
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(
> test, "/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a", name,
> "find testcase-alias/phandle-tests/consumer-a failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
> kfree(name);
>
>
> // find node by name missing path
>
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(
> test,
> np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/missing-path"), NULL,
> "non-existent path returned node %pOF\n", np);
> of_node_put(np);
>
>
> // find node by name missing alias
>
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(
> test, np = of_find_node_by_path("missing-alias"), NULL,
> "non-existent alias returned node %pOF\n", np);
> of_node_put(np);
>
>
> // find node by name missing alias with relative path
>
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(
> test,
> np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/missing-path"), NULL,
> "non-existent alias with relative path returned node %pOF\n",
> np);
> of_node_put(np);
>
>
> // find node by name with option
>
> np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:testoption", &options);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "testoption", options,
> "option path test failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
>
>
> // find node by name with option and slash
>
> np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:test/option", &options);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/option", options,
> "option path test, subcase #1 failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
>
> np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data/testcase-device1:test/option", &options);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/option", options,
> "option path test, subcase #2 failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
>
>
> // find node by name with null option
>
> np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:testoption", NULL);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, np,
> "NULL option path test failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
>
>
> // find node by name with option alias
>
> np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:testaliasoption",
> &options);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "testaliasoption", options,
> "option alias path test failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
>
>
> // find node by name with option alias and slash
>
> np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:test/alias/option",
> &options);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/alias/option", options,
> "option alias path test, subcase #1 failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
>
>
> // find node by name with null option alias
>
> np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:testaliasoption", NULL);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(
> test, np, "NULL option alias path test failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
>
>
> // find node by name option clearing
>
> options = "testoption";
> np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias", &options);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, options, NULL,
> "option clearing test failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
>
>
> // find node by name option clearing root
>
> options = "testoption";
> np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/", &options);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, options, NULL,
> "option clearing root node test failed\n");
> of_node_put(np);
> }
>
> static int of_test_init(struct kunit *test)
> {
> /* adding data for unittest */
> KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, unittest_data_add());
>
> if (!of_aliases)
> of_aliases = of_find_node_by_path("/aliases");
>
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, of_find_node_by_path(
> "/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a"));
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> static struct kunit_case of_test_cases[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(of_unittest_find_node_by_name),
> {},
> };
>
> static struct kunit_module of_test_module = {
> .name = "of-base-test",
> .init = of_test_init,
> .test_cases = of_test_cases,
> };
> module_test(of_test_module);
>
>
>>
>>
>>>> be cases where the devicetree unittests are currently not well grouped
>>>> and may benefit from change, but if so that should be handled independently
>>>> of any transformation into a KUnit framework.
>>>
>>> I agree. I did this because I wanted to illustrate what I thought real
>>> world KUnit unit tests should look like (I also wanted to be able to
>>> show off KUnit test features that help you write these kinds of
>>> tests); I was not necessarily intending that all the of: unittest
>>> patches would get merged in with the whole RFC. I was mostly trying to
>>> create cause for discussion (which it seems like I succeeded at ;-) ).
>>>
>>> So fair enough, I will propose these patches separately and later
>>> (except of course this one that splits up the file). Do you want the
>>> initial transformation to the KUnit framework in the main KUnit
>>> patchset, or do you want that to be done separately? If I recall, Rob
>>> suggested this as a good initial example that other people could refer
>>> to, and some people seemed to think that I needed one to help guide
>>> the discussion and provide direction for early users. I don't
>>> necessarily think that means the initial real world example needs to
>>> be a part of the initial patchset though.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/*
* Unit tests for functions defined in base.c.
*/
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <kunit/test.h>
#include "test-common.h"
static void of_test_find_node_by_name_basic(struct kunit *test)
{
struct device_node *np;
const char *name;
np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data");
name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "/testcase-data", name,
"find /testcase-data failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
kfree(name);
}
static void of_test_find_node_by_name_trailing_slash(struct kunit *test)
{
/* Test if trailing '/' works */
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/"), NULL,
"trailing '/' on /testcase-data/ should fail\n");
}
static void of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components(struct kunit *test)
{
struct device_node *np;
const char *name;
np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a");
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(
test, "/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a", name,
"find /testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
kfree(name);
}
static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias(struct kunit *test)
{
struct device_node *np;
const char *name;
np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias");
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "/testcase-data", name,
"find testcase-alias failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
kfree(name);
}
static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias_and_slash(struct kunit *test)
{
/* Test if trailing '/' works on aliases */
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/"), NULL,
"trailing '/' on testcase-alias/ should fail\n");
}
/*
* TODO(brendanhiggins at google.com): This looks like a duplicate of
* of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components
*/
static void of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components_2(struct kunit *test)
{
struct device_node *np;
const char *name;
np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/phandle-tests/consumer-a");
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(
test, "/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a", name,
"find testcase-alias/phandle-tests/consumer-a failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
kfree(name);
}
static void of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_path(struct kunit *test)
{
struct device_node *np;
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(
test,
np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/missing-path"), NULL,
"non-existent path returned node %pOF\n", np);
of_node_put(np);
}
static void of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias(struct kunit *test)
{
struct device_node *np;
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(
test, np = of_find_node_by_path("missing-alias"), NULL,
"non-existent alias returned node %pOF\n", np);
of_node_put(np);
}
static void of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias_with_relative_path(
struct kunit *test)
{
struct device_node *np;
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(
test,
np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/missing-path"), NULL,
"non-existent alias with relative path returned node %pOF\n",
np);
of_node_put(np);
}
static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option(struct kunit *test)
{
struct device_node *np;
const char *options;
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:testoption", &options);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "testoption", options,
"option path test failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
}
static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_and_slash(struct kunit *test)
{
struct device_node *np;
const char *options;
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:test/option", &options);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/option", options,
"option path test, subcase #1 failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data/testcase-device1:test/option", &options);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/option", options,
"option path test, subcase #2 failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
}
static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option(struct kunit *test)
{
struct device_node *np;
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:testoption", NULL);
KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, np,
"NULL option path test failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
}
static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias(struct kunit *test)
{
struct device_node *np;
const char *options;
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:testaliasoption",
&options);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "testaliasoption", options,
"option alias path test failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
}
static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias_and_slash(
struct kunit *test)
{
struct device_node *np;
const char *options;
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:test/alias/option",
&options);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/alias/option", options,
"option alias path test, subcase #1 failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
}
static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option_alias(struct kunit *test)
{
struct device_node *np;
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:testaliasoption", NULL);
KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(
test, np, "NULL option alias path test failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
}
static void of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing(struct kunit *test)
{
struct device_node *np;
const char *options;
options = "testoption";
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias", &options);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, options, NULL,
"option clearing test failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
}
static void of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing_root(struct kunit *test)
{
struct device_node *np;
const char *options;
options = "testoption";
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/", &options);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, options, NULL,
"option clearing root node test failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
}
static int of_test_find_node_by_name_init(struct kunit *test)
{
/* adding data for unittest */
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, unittest_data_add());
if (!of_aliases)
of_aliases = of_find_node_by_path("/aliases");
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, of_find_node_by_path(
"/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a"));
return 0;
}
static struct kunit_case of_test_find_node_by_name_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_basic),
KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_trailing_slash),
KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components),
KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias),
KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias_and_slash),
KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components_2),
KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_path),
KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias),
KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias_with_relative_path),
KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option),
KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_and_slash),
KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option),
KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias),
KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias_and_slash),
KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option_alias),
KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing),
KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing_root),
{},
};
static struct kunit_module of_test_find_node_by_name_module = {
.name = "of-test-find-node-by-name",
.init = of_test_find_node_by_name_init,
.test_cases = of_test_find_node_by_name_cases,
};
module_test(of_test_find_node_by_name_module);
-------------- next part --------------
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/*
* Unit tests for functions defined in base.c.
*/
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <kunit/test.h>
#include "test-common.h"
static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
{
struct device_node *np;
const char *options, *name;
// find node by name basic
np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data");
name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "/testcase-data", name,
"find /testcase-data failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
kfree(name);
// find node by name trailing slash
/* Test if trailing '/' works */
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/"), NULL,
"trailing '/' on /testcase-data/ should fail\n");
// find node by name multiple components
np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a");
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(
test, "/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a", name,
"find /testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
kfree(name);
// find node by name with alias
np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias");
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "/testcase-data", name,
"find testcase-alias failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
kfree(name);
// find node by name with alias and slash
/* Test if trailing '/' works on aliases */
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/"), NULL,
"trailing '/' on testcase-alias/ should fail\n");
// find node by name multiple components 2
np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/phandle-tests/consumer-a");
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(
test, "/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a", name,
"find testcase-alias/phandle-tests/consumer-a failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
kfree(name);
// find node by name missing path
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(
test,
np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/missing-path"), NULL,
"non-existent path returned node %pOF\n", np);
of_node_put(np);
// find node by name missing alias
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(
test, np = of_find_node_by_path("missing-alias"), NULL,
"non-existent alias returned node %pOF\n", np);
of_node_put(np);
// find node by name missing alias with relative path
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(
test,
np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/missing-path"), NULL,
"non-existent alias with relative path returned node %pOF\n",
np);
of_node_put(np);
// find node by name with option
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:testoption", &options);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "testoption", options,
"option path test failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
// find node by name with option and slash
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:test/option", &options);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/option", options,
"option path test, subcase #1 failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data/testcase-device1:test/option", &options);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/option", options,
"option path test, subcase #2 failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
// find node by name with null option
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:testoption", NULL);
KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, np,
"NULL option path test failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
// find node by name with option alias
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:testaliasoption",
&options);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "testaliasoption", options,
"option alias path test failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
// find node by name with option alias and slash
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:test/alias/option",
&options);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/alias/option", options,
"option alias path test, subcase #1 failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
// find node by name with null option alias
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:testaliasoption", NULL);
KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(
test, np, "NULL option alias path test failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
// find node by name option clearing
options = "testoption";
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias", &options);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, options, NULL,
"option clearing test failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
// find node by name option clearing root
options = "testoption";
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/", &options);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, options, NULL,
"option clearing root node test failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
}
static int of_test_init(struct kunit *test)
{
/* adding data for unittest */
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, unittest_data_add());
if (!of_aliases)
of_aliases = of_find_node_by_path("/aliases");
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, of_find_node_by_path(
"/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a"));
return 0;
}
static struct kunit_case of_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(of_unittest_find_node_by_name),
{},
};
static struct kunit_module of_test_module = {
.name = "of-base-test",
.init = of_test_init,
.test_cases = of_test_cases,
};
module_test(of_test_module);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-20 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 232+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-28 19:36 [RFC v3 00/19] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 01/19] kunit: test: add KUnit test runner core brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-30 3:14 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:14 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-01 1:51 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-01 1:51 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-01 2:57 ` mcgrof
2018-12-01 2:57 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-05 13:15 ` anton.ivanov
2018-12-05 13:15 ` Anton Ivanov
2018-12-05 14:45 ` arnd
2018-12-05 14:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-12-05 14:49 ` anton.ivanov
2018-12-05 14:49 ` Anton Ivanov
2018-11-30 3:28 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:28 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-01 2:08 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-01 2:08 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-01 3:10 ` mcgrof
2018-12-01 3:10 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 22:47 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 22:47 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-01 3:02 ` mcgrof
2018-12-01 3:02 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 02/19] kunit: test: add test resource management API brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 03/19] kunit: test: add string_stream a std::stream like string builder brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-30 3:29 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:29 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-01 2:14 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-01 2:14 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-01 3:12 ` mcgrof
2018-12-01 3:12 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 10:55 ` pmladek
2018-12-03 10:55 ` Petr Mladek
2018-12-04 0:35 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-04 0:35 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 04/19] kunit: test: add test_stream a std::stream like logger brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 05/19] kunit: test: add the concept of expectations brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 06/19] arch: um: enable running kunit from User Mode Linux brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 21:26 ` robh
2018-11-28 21:26 ` Rob Herring
2018-11-30 3:37 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:37 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-11-30 14:05 ` robh
2018-11-30 14:05 ` Rob Herring
2018-11-30 18:22 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 18:22 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 23:22 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 23:22 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-30 3:30 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:30 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 07/19] kunit: test: add initial tests brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-30 3:40 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:40 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 23:26 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 23:26 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-03 23:43 ` mcgrof
2018-12-03 23:43 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 08/19] arch: um: add shim to trap to allow installing a fault catcher for tests brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-30 3:34 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:34 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 23:34 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 23:34 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-03 23:46 ` mcgrof
2018-12-03 23:46 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-04 0:44 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-04 0:44 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-30 3:41 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:41 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 23:37 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 23:37 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 09/19] kunit: test: add the concept of assertions brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 10/19] kunit: test: add test managed resource tests brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 11/19] kunit: add Python libraries for handing KUnit config and kernel brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-29 13:54 ` kieran.bingham
2018-11-29 13:54 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-12-03 23:48 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 23:48 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-04 20:47 ` mcgrof
2018-12-04 20:47 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-06 12:32 ` kieran.bingham
2018-12-06 12:32 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-12-06 15:37 ` willy
2018-12-06 15:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-07 11:30 ` kieran.bingham
2018-12-07 11:30 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-12-11 14:09 ` pmladek
2018-12-11 14:09 ` Petr Mladek
2018-12-11 14:41 ` rostedt
2018-12-11 14:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-12-11 17:01 ` anton.ivanov
2018-12-11 17:01 ` Anton Ivanov
2019-02-09 0:40 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-09 0:40 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-07 1:05 ` mcgrof
2018-12-07 1:05 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-07 18:35 ` kent.overstreet
2018-12-07 18:35 ` Kent Overstreet
2018-11-30 3:44 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:44 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 23:50 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 23:50 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-04 20:48 ` mcgrof
2018-12-04 20:48 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 12/19] kunit: add KUnit wrapper script and simple output parser brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 13/19] kunit: improve output from python wrapper brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 14/19] Documentation: kunit: add documentation for KUnit brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-29 13:56 ` kieran.bingham
2018-11-29 13:56 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-11-30 3:45 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:45 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 23:53 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 23:53 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-06 12:16 ` kieran.bingham
2018-12-06 12:16 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-02-09 0:56 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-09 0:56 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-11 12:16 ` kieran.bingham
2019-02-11 12:16 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-02-12 22:10 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-12 22:10 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-13 21:55 ` kieran.bingham
2019-02-13 21:55 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-02-14 0:17 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-14 0:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-14 17:26 ` mcgrof
2019-02-14 17:26 ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-02-14 22:07 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-14 22:07 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 15/19] MAINTAINERS: add entry for KUnit the unit testing framework brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 16/19] arch: um: make UML unflatten device tree when testing brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 21:16 ` robh
2018-11-28 21:16 ` Rob Herring
2018-12-04 0:00 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-04 0:00 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-30 3:46 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:46 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-04 0:02 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-04 0:02 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 17/19] of: unittest: migrate tests to run on KUnit brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
[not found] ` <CAL_Jsq+09Kx7yMBC_Jw45QGmk6U_fp4N6HOZDwYrM4tWw+_dOA@mail.gmail.com>
2018-11-30 0:39 ` rdunlap
2018-11-30 0:39 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-12-04 0:13 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-04 0:13 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-04 13:40 ` robh
2018-12-04 13:40 ` Rob Herring
2018-12-05 23:42 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-05 23:42 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-07 0:41 ` robh
2018-12-07 0:41 ` Rob Herring
2018-12-04 0:08 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-04 0:08 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-13 1:44 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-13 1:44 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-14 20:10 ` robh
2019-02-14 20:10 ` Rob Herring
2019-02-14 21:52 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-14 21:52 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-18 22:56 ` frowand.list
2019-02-18 22:56 ` Frank Rowand
2019-02-28 0:29 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-28 0:29 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-04 10:56 ` frowand.list
2018-12-04 10:56 ` Frank Rowand
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 18/19] of: unittest: split out a couple of test cases from unittest brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-04 10:58 ` frowand.list
2018-12-04 10:58 ` Frank Rowand
2018-12-05 23:54 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-05 23:54 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-14 23:57 ` frowand.list
2019-02-14 23:57 ` Frank Rowand
2019-02-15 0:56 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-15 0:56 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-15 2:05 ` frowand.list
2019-02-15 2:05 ` Frank Rowand
2019-02-15 10:56 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-15 10:56 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-18 22:25 ` frowand.list
2019-02-18 22:25 ` Frank Rowand
2019-02-20 20:44 ` frowand.list
2019-02-20 20:44 ` Frank Rowand
2019-02-20 20:47 ` frowand.list [this message]
2019-02-20 20:47 ` Frank Rowand
2019-02-28 3:52 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-28 3:52 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-03-22 0:22 ` frowand.list
2019-03-22 0:22 ` Frank Rowand
2019-03-22 1:30 ` brendanhiggins
2019-03-22 1:30 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-03-22 1:47 ` frowand.list
2019-03-22 1:47 ` Frank Rowand
2019-03-25 22:15 ` brendanhiggins
2019-03-25 22:15 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-09-20 16:57 ` Rob Herring
2019-09-21 23:57 ` Frank Rowand
2019-03-22 1:34 ` frowand.list
2019-03-22 1:34 ` Frank Rowand
2019-03-25 22:18 ` brendanhiggins
2019-03-25 22:18 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 19/19] of: unittest: split up some super large test cases brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-04 10:52 ` [RFC v3 00/19] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework frowand.list
2018-12-04 10:52 ` Frank Rowand
2018-12-04 11:40 ` frowand.list
2018-12-04 11:40 ` Frank Rowand
2018-12-04 13:49 ` robh
2018-12-04 13:49 ` Rob Herring
2018-12-05 23:10 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-05 23:10 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-03-22 0:27 ` frowand.list
2019-03-22 0:27 ` Frank Rowand
2019-03-25 22:04 ` brendanhiggins
2019-03-25 22:04 ` Brendan Higgins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af11bb26-6f7e-393a-5109-0c33cdab6b42@gmail.com \
--to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).