* Tests tree not submitted? @ 2008-05-19 3:54 Stephen Rothwell 2008-05-19 4:38 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-05-19 3:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli; +Cc: Sam Ravnborg, linux-next [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 502 bytes --] Hi Ananth, Sam, Is there some reason that the tests tree changes have not bee submitted to Linus yet? They have been in linux-next for quite some time now (since February 24) without any changes. It currently only gets a conflict with lib/Kconfig.debug but that is easy to fix up and I had to add a "depends on BLOCK" to the entry for "config LKDTM" in the new tests/Kconfig file. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Tests tree not submitted? 2008-05-19 3:54 Tests tree not submitted? Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-05-19 4:38 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli 2008-05-19 5:00 ` Andrew Morton 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli @ 2008-05-19 4:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Rothwell, Andrew Morton; +Cc: Sam Ravnborg, linux-next On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 01:54:36PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Ananth, Sam, Hi Stephen, > Is there some reason that the tests tree changes have not bee submitted > to Linus yet? They have been in linux-next for quite some time now > (since February 24) without any changes. When this was submitted last, the opinion was that since it was post 2.6.25-rc2 and since it had Kconfig changes, this should be deferred to the next release. However I got busy during the merge time and couldn't resumbit this. I believe this being a code movement, its mostly benign. But if it needs to wait for 2.6.27, thats fine too; also given that the -mm is now based on -next, it'll get a lot more tested. Andrew, What is the best way forward here? Given the code has been in -next for a few months, and given -mm is now based on -next, will you be pushing these changes to Linus during the next merge window? Or, do you want me to resubmit the patchset again later in the 2.6.26-rc cycle? Ananth ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Tests tree not submitted? 2008-05-19 4:38 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli @ 2008-05-19 5:00 ` Andrew Morton 2008-05-19 5:37 ` Stephen Rothwell 2008-05-19 5:49 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-05-19 5:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ananth; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Sam Ravnborg, linux-next On Mon, 19 May 2008 10:08:22 +0530 Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 01:54:36PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Ananth, Sam, > > Hi Stephen, > > > Is there some reason that the tests tree changes have not bee submitted > > to Linus yet? They have been in linux-next for quite some time now > > (since February 24) without any changes. > > When this was submitted last, the opinion was that since it was post > 2.6.25-rc2 and since it had Kconfig changes, this should be deferred to > the next release. However I got busy during the merge time and couldn't > resumbit this. > > I believe this being a code movement, its mostly benign. But if it needs > to wait for 2.6.27, thats fine too; also given that the -mm is now based > on -next, it'll get a lot more tested. > > Andrew, > > What is the best way forward here? Given the code has been in -next for > a few months, and given -mm is now based on -next, will you be pushing > these changes to Linus during the next merge window? Or, do you want me > to resubmit the patchset again later in the 2.6.26-rc cycle? <brief panic> I don't even know what the "tests" tree _is_. Searching the past seven weeks lmkl archives for From:.*ananth.* turns up zero hits. So whatever this thing is, it's waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too low-profile. Did you even send Linus a pull request? I have no record of one. Secret tree :( ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Tests tree not submitted? 2008-05-19 5:00 ` Andrew Morton @ 2008-05-19 5:37 ` Stephen Rothwell 2008-05-19 6:30 ` Sam Ravnborg 2008-05-19 5:49 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-05-19 5:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: ananth, Sam Ravnborg, linux-next [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1373 bytes --] Hi Andrew, On Sun, 18 May 2008 22:00:03 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > <brief panic> > > I don't even know what the "tests" tree _is_. > > Searching the past seven weeks lmkl archives for From:.*ananth.* turns > up zero hits. > > So whatever this thing is, it's waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too low-profile. > > Did you even send Linus a pull request? I have no record of one. > > Secret tree :( I don;t have the original pull request in my archive, but I do have an email from Sam Ravnborg dated Feb 19 saying (in part): "Hi Anath. Linus did not pull this in the -rc1 to -rc2 timeframe so please resubmit the patch serie one week into the next merge window (when most of the trees has hit linus' tree and Andrew has made his first merge). IF you need an extra eye balling then you can submit a few weeks before the merge window opens. Thats typical after an -rc with only a few patches." After which Ananth asked me to add it to linux-next and I did on Feb 24. So, not a complete secret :-) and a pull request was sent on Feb 12 (actually by Sam who put this stuff into a git tree for Ananth). This tree (patch set) has not changed since Feb 24 and only has the one simple conflict I noted. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Tests tree not submitted? 2008-05-19 5:37 ` Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-05-19 6:30 ` Sam Ravnborg 2008-05-19 6:39 ` Stephen Rothwell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2008-05-19 6:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Andrew Morton, ananth, linux-next On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 03:37:04PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On Sun, 18 May 2008 22:00:03 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > <brief panic> > > > > I don't even know what the "tests" tree _is_. > > > > Searching the past seven weeks lmkl archives for From:.*ananth.* turns > > up zero hits. > > > > So whatever this thing is, it's waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too low-profile. > > > > Did you even send Linus a pull request? I have no record of one. > > > > Secret tree :( > > I don;t have the original pull request in my archive, but I do have an email from Sam Ravnborg dated Feb 19 saying (in part): > > "Hi Anath. > > Linus did not pull this in the -rc1 to -rc2 timeframe > so please resubmit the patch serie one week into the > next merge window (when most of the trees has hit linus' tree > and Andrew has made his first merge). > > IF you need an extra eye balling then you can submit > a few weeks before the merge window opens. > Thats typical after an -rc with only a few patches." > > After which Ananth asked me to add it to linux-next and I did on Feb 24. > > So, not a complete secret :-) and a pull request was sent on Feb 12 > (actually by Sam who put this stuff into a git tree for Ananth). This > tree (patch set) has not changed since Feb 24 and only has the one simple > conflict I noted. Andrew mumbled about taking these patches via kbuild.it and in order to avoid that I created a new test.git tree that I then have not given any care since. Anath - I can update test.git if you send me a new patch-set but otherwise I cannot do much work on it. Too busy with other stuff. Sam ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Tests tree not submitted? 2008-05-19 6:30 ` Sam Ravnborg @ 2008-05-19 6:39 ` Stephen Rothwell 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-05-19 6:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sam Ravnborg; +Cc: Andrew Morton, ananth, linux-next [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 698 bytes --] Hi Sam, Ananth, On Mon, 19 May 2008 08:30:27 +0200 Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote: > > Andrew mumbled about taking these patches via kbuild.it and in order to > avoid that I created a new test.git tree that I then have not given any care since. > > Anath - I can update test.git if you send me a new patch-set but otherwise > I cannot do much work on it. > Too busy with other stuff. It might be better if it can go in as is and then fix patches applied after that. That gets the infrastructure in and it is certainly not causing any problems as far as I can see. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Tests tree not submitted? 2008-05-19 5:00 ` Andrew Morton 2008-05-19 5:37 ` Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-05-19 5:49 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli @ 2008-05-19 5:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Sam Ravnborg, linux-next On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 10:00:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 19 May 2008 10:08:22 +0530 Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 01:54:36PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi Ananth, Sam, > > > > Hi Stephen, > > > > > Is there some reason that the tests tree changes have not bee submitted > > > to Linus yet? They have been in linux-next for quite some time now > > > (since February 24) without any changes. > > > > When this was submitted last, the opinion was that since it was post > > 2.6.25-rc2 and since it had Kconfig changes, this should be deferred to > > the next release. However I got busy during the merge time and couldn't > > resumbit this. > > > > I believe this being a code movement, its mostly benign. But if it needs > > to wait for 2.6.27, thats fine too; also given that the -mm is now based > > on -next, it'll get a lot more tested. > > > > Andrew, > > > > What is the best way forward here? Given the code has been in -next for > > a few months, and given -mm is now based on -next, will you be pushing > > these changes to Linus during the next merge window? Or, do you want me > > to resubmit the patchset again later in the 2.6.26-rc cycle? > > <brief panic> Oops! Sorry Andrew :-) > I don't even know what the "tests" tree _is_. > > Searching the past seven weeks lmkl archives for From:.*ananth.* turns > up zero hits. http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120285599718700&w=2 is Sam's mail to lkml about it. > So whatever this thing is, it's waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too low-profile. Yes, its nothing earth shattering :-) Just code consolidation. > Did you even send Linus a pull request? I have no record of one. Sam did http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120285599718700&w=2 again. Ananth ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-05-19 6:39 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2008-05-19 3:54 Tests tree not submitted? Stephen Rothwell 2008-05-19 4:38 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli 2008-05-19 5:00 ` Andrew Morton 2008-05-19 5:37 ` Stephen Rothwell 2008-05-19 6:30 ` Sam Ravnborg 2008-05-19 6:39 ` Stephen Rothwell 2008-05-19 5:49 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).