* Place for userland swsusp parts @ 2006-01-11 22:15 Pavel Machek 2006-01-11 22:19 ` Nigel Cunningham 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Pavel Machek @ 2006-01-11 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Nigel Cunningham; +Cc: kernel list Hi! Is there some place where we could put userland swsusp parts under version control? swsusp.sf.net looks like possible place, but it has been in use by suspend2... Is it still being used? If not, would it be possible to "hijack" it for swsusp development? Pavel -- Thanks, Sharp! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Place for userland swsusp parts 2006-01-11 22:15 Place for userland swsusp parts Pavel Machek @ 2006-01-11 22:19 ` Nigel Cunningham 2006-01-12 14:38 ` Pavel Machek 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Nigel Cunningham @ 2006-01-11 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pavel Machek; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, kernel list Hi. On Thursday 12 January 2006 08:15, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > Is there some place where we could put userland swsusp parts under > version control? > > swsusp.sf.net looks like possible place, but it has been in use by > suspend2... Is it still being used? If not, would it be possible to > "hijack" it for swsusp development? It's not still being used (we have suspend2.net now). The only problem I see with that is that it still has all the old suspend2 stuff and Sourceforge make it really hard to clear out a project's files. You were talking about calling it uswsusp or something like that. How about starting a uswsusp.sf.net? Regards, Nigel -- Nigel, Michelle and Alisdair Cunningham 72 Brownie Street, Jamboree Heights Brisbane 4074, Australia +61 (7) 3279 6728 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Place for userland swsusp parts 2006-01-11 22:19 ` Nigel Cunningham @ 2006-01-12 14:38 ` Pavel Machek 2006-01-12 20:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Pavel Machek @ 2006-01-12 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nigel Cunningham; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, kernel list On Čt 12-01-06 08:19:42, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. > > On Thursday 12 January 2006 08:15, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Is there some place where we could put userland swsusp parts under > > version control? > > > > swsusp.sf.net looks like possible place, but it has been in use by > > suspend2... Is it still being used? If not, would it be possible to > > "hijack" it for swsusp development? > > It's not still being used (we have suspend2.net now). The only problem I see > with that is that it still has all the old suspend2 stuff and Sourceforge > make it really hard to clear out a project's files. You were talking about > calling it uswsusp or something like that. How about starting a > uswsusp.sf.net? Rafael, do you have repository to place userland parts in, or should I start uswsusp.sf.net project, or do you want to do it? Pavel -- Thanks, Sharp! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Place for userland swsusp parts 2006-01-12 14:38 ` Pavel Machek @ 2006-01-12 20:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2006-01-13 0:21 ` Pavel Machek 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2006-01-12 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pavel Machek; +Cc: Nigel Cunningham, kernel list Hi, On Thursday, 12 January 2006 15:38, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Čt 12-01-06 08:19:42, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > On Thursday 12 January 2006 08:15, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Is there some place where we could put userland swsusp parts under > > > version control? > > > > > > swsusp.sf.net looks like possible place, but it has been in use by > > > suspend2... Is it still being used? If not, would it be possible to > > > "hijack" it for swsusp development? > > > > It's not still being used (we have suspend2.net now). The only problem I see > > with that is that it still has all the old suspend2 stuff and Sourceforge > > make it really hard to clear out a project's files. You were talking about > > calling it uswsusp or something like that. How about starting a > > uswsusp.sf.net? > > Rafael, do you have repository to place userland parts in, or should I > start uswsusp.sf.net project, or do you want to do it? I think I can host them (the box is moving tomorrow, hopefully, so it should get enough bandwidth ;-)), but I'm afraid I won't have time to set up a mailing list etc. IMHO uswsusp.sf.net would be too similar to swsusp.sf.net, especially that swsusp.sf.net is redirected to www.suspend2.net. Greetings, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Place for userland swsusp parts 2006-01-12 20:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2006-01-13 0:21 ` Pavel Machek 2006-01-13 1:00 ` Bernard Blackham 2006-01-13 11:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Pavel Machek @ 2006-01-13 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Nigel Cunningham, kernel list Hi! > > > On Thursday 12 January 2006 08:15, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > Is there some place where we could put userland swsusp parts under > > > > version control? > > > > > > > > swsusp.sf.net looks like possible place, but it has been in use by > > > > suspend2... Is it still being used? If not, would it be possible to > > > > "hijack" it for swsusp development? > > > > > > It's not still being used (we have suspend2.net now). The only problem I see > > > with that is that it still has all the old suspend2 stuff and Sourceforge > > > make it really hard to clear out a project's files. You were talking about > > > calling it uswsusp or something like that. How about starting a > > > uswsusp.sf.net? > > > > Rafael, do you have repository to place userland parts in, or should I > > start uswsusp.sf.net project, or do you want to do it? > > I think I can host them (the box is moving tomorrow, hopefully, so it should get > enough bandwidth ;-)), but I'm afraid I won't have time to set up a mailing list > etc. Actually, it would probably be better to put it on sourceforge or something like that. That way you don't have to care about sysadmin stuff (mailing lists etc), backups, backup conectivity, etc, etc. > IMHO uswsusp.sf.net would be too similar to swsusp.sf.net, especially that > swsusp.sf.net is redirected to www.suspend2.net. Or maybe we can get hosting on suspend2.net? Or create userswsusp.sf.net (that name is ugly :-(). ...some revision control would be nice, but perhaps revision control is enough and we can just put git tree on kernel.org? Pavel -- Thanks, Sharp! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Place for userland swsusp parts 2006-01-13 0:21 ` Pavel Machek @ 2006-01-13 1:00 ` Bernard Blackham 2006-01-13 11:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Bernard Blackham @ 2006-01-13 1:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pavel Machek; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Nigel Cunningham, kernel list On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 01:21:38AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > IMHO uswsusp.sf.net would be too similar to swsusp.sf.net, especially that > > swsusp.sf.net is redirected to www.suspend2.net. I can put a "were you looking for uswsusp.sf.net?" on the suspend2 page if it came from swsusp.sf.net :) > Or maybe we can get hosting on suspend2.net? suspend2.net's bandwidth isn't too cheap, so most of the web traffic is funneled out to mirrors. Getting mirrors to update vhosts can take some time. sf.net would probably be quicker! Bernard. -- Bernard Blackham <bernard at blackham dot com dot au> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Place for userland swsusp parts 2006-01-13 0:21 ` Pavel Machek 2006-01-13 1:00 ` Bernard Blackham @ 2006-01-13 11:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2006-01-13 12:09 ` Pavel Machek 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2006-01-13 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pavel Machek; +Cc: Nigel Cunningham, kernel list Hi, On Friday, 13 January 2006 01:21, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > On Thursday 12 January 2006 08:15, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > Is there some place where we could put userland swsusp parts under > > > > > version control? > > > > > > > > > > swsusp.sf.net looks like possible place, but it has been in use by > > > > > suspend2... Is it still being used? If not, would it be possible to > > > > > "hijack" it for swsusp development? > > > > > > > > It's not still being used (we have suspend2.net now). The only problem I see > > > > with that is that it still has all the old suspend2 stuff and Sourceforge > > > > make it really hard to clear out a project's files. You were talking about > > > > calling it uswsusp or something like that. How about starting a > > > > uswsusp.sf.net? > > > > > > Rafael, do you have repository to place userland parts in, or should I > > > start uswsusp.sf.net project, or do you want to do it? > > > > I think I can host them (the box is moving tomorrow, hopefully, so it should get > > enough bandwidth ;-)), but I'm afraid I won't have time to set up a mailing list > > etc. > > Actually, it would probably be better to put it on sourceforge or > something like that. That way you don't have to care about sysadmin > stuff (mailing lists etc), backups, backup conectivity, etc, etc. Agreed. > > IMHO uswsusp.sf.net would be too similar to swsusp.sf.net, especially that > > swsusp.sf.net is redirected to www.suspend2.net. > > Or maybe we can get hosting on suspend2.net? Or create > userswsusp.sf.net (that name is ugly :-(). suspend.sf.net seems to be available. We can use it, I think. > ...some revision control would be nice, but perhaps revision control > is enough and we can just put git tree on kernel.org? IMHO quilt will suffice to manage patches, at least for starters, but we'll need a mailing list and an intro web page. Greetings, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Place for userland swsusp parts 2006-01-13 11:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2006-01-13 12:09 ` Pavel Machek 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Pavel Machek @ 2006-01-13 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Nigel Cunningham, kernel list Hi! > > > IMHO uswsusp.sf.net would be too similar to swsusp.sf.net, especially that > > > swsusp.sf.net is redirected to www.suspend2.net. > > > > Or maybe we can get hosting on suspend2.net? Or create > > userswsusp.sf.net (that name is ugly :-(). > > suspend.sf.net seems to be available. We can use it, I think. Ok. <evil>Or we can register suspend2.sf.net, and manage exchange for swsusp.sf.net :-)))))</evil> > > ...some revision control would be nice, but perhaps revision control > > is enough and we can just put git tree on kernel.org? > > IMHO quilt will suffice to manage patches, at least for starters, but we'll > need a mailing list and an intro web page. Well, we'll just get the kernel patch merged, so I don't see a need for quilt. But we'll need some CVS/SVN/something for userland parts. Do you want to register suspend.sf.net, or should I do it? Pavel -- Thanks, Sharp! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-13 12:10 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2006-01-11 22:15 Place for userland swsusp parts Pavel Machek 2006-01-11 22:19 ` Nigel Cunningham 2006-01-12 14:38 ` Pavel Machek 2006-01-12 20:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2006-01-13 0:21 ` Pavel Machek 2006-01-13 1:00 ` Bernard Blackham 2006-01-13 11:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2006-01-13 12:09 ` Pavel Machek
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).