From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched: automated per session task groups
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:03:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101129180324.GA14046@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1291052268.32004.171.camel@laptop>
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 08:27 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 3:53 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> > >
> > > Well we totally re-wrote the cgroup load-balancer in -tip. The thing
> > > currently in -linus is a utter crap because its very strongly serialized
> > > across all cores (some people spend like 25% of their time in there).
> >
> > Well, it seems that the rewrite is more crap than the "utter crap" in
> > current -git. What does that make -tip? Super-utter-crap?
> >
> > Peter - getting the wrong answer quickly is not any better than strong
> > serialization.
>
> I know, from the testing so far we _thought_ it was fairly sane.
> Apparently there's still some work to do.
Btw., i think it shows the conceptual power of Mike's patch that this cgroups
scheduling suckage was exposed so clearly. Previously it took weeks (sometimes
months) for bugs to reach those who are using cgroups.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-29 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-21 13:37 [PATCH v4] sched: automated per session task groups Ingo Molnar
2010-11-21 13:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-21 15:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-21 16:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-21 16:15 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-21 18:43 ` Gene Heskett
2010-11-25 16:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-28 14:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-28 19:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-28 20:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-29 11:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-29 12:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-29 13:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-29 13:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-29 14:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-29 16:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-29 16:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-29 17:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-29 18:03 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2010-11-29 19:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-29 19:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30 3:39 ` Paul Turner
2010-11-30 4:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30 4:23 ` Paul Turner
2010-11-30 13:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-30 13:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30 14:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30 16:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30 15:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-11-30 17:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30 19:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 5:01 ` Américo Wang
2010-12-01 6:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-01 11:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 22:12 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-12-01 5:57 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-01 11:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 11:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-01 14:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 15:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30 7:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30 14:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30 14:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30 15:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-30 15:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30 16:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-29 5:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-01 3:39 ` Paul Turner
2010-12-01 3:39 ` Paul Turner
2010-12-01 6:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-03 5:11 ` Paul Turner
2010-12-03 6:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-03 8:37 ` Paul Turner
2010-12-04 23:55 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2010-12-05 5:11 ` Paul Turner
2010-12-07 11:32 ` Paul Turner
2010-12-15 12:10 ` Paul Turner
2010-12-01 11:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-15 1:13 [RFC/RFT PATCH v3] sched: automated per tty " Mike Galbraith
2010-11-15 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-15 11:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-15 11:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-15 12:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-15 21:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-16 13:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-16 14:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-16 15:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-16 15:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-16 17:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-20 19:35 ` [PATCH v4] sched: automated per session " Mike Galbraith
2010-12-04 17:39 ` Colin Walters
2010-12-04 18:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-12-04 20:01 ` Colin Walters
2010-12-04 22:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-12-04 23:43 ` Colin Walters
2010-12-05 0:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-12-05 7:47 ` Ray Lee
2010-12-05 19:22 ` Colin Walters
2010-12-05 20:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-12-05 22:47 ` Colin Walters
2010-12-05 22:58 ` Jesper Juhl
2010-12-05 23:05 ` Jesper Juhl
2010-12-07 18:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-05 10:18 ` Con Kolivas
2010-12-05 11:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-05 20:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-12-04 23:31 ` david
2010-12-05 11:11 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2010-12-06 0:28 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101129180324.GA14046@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).