From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 13/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor low-level TDP MMU set SPTE helper to take raw values
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 14:38:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220303193842.370645-14-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220303193842.370645-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Refactor __tdp_mmu_set_spte() to work with raw values instead of a
tdp_iter objects so that a future patch can modify SPTEs without doing a
walk, and without having to synthesize a tdp_iter.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Message-Id: <20220226001546.360188-13-seanjc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 41175ee7e111..0ffa62abde2d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -603,9 +603,13 @@ static inline int tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
/*
* __tdp_mmu_set_spte - Set a TDP MMU SPTE and handle the associated bookkeeping
- * @kvm: kvm instance
- * @iter: a tdp_iter instance currently on the SPTE that should be set
- * @new_spte: The value the SPTE should be set to
+ * @kvm: KVM instance
+ * @as_id: Address space ID, i.e. regular vs. SMM
+ * @sptep: Pointer to the SPTE
+ * @old_spte: The current value of the SPTE
+ * @new_spte: The new value that will be set for the SPTE
+ * @gfn: The base GFN that was (or will be) mapped by the SPTE
+ * @level: The level _containing_ the SPTE (its parent PT's level)
* @record_acc_track: Notify the MM subsystem of changes to the accessed state
* of the page. Should be set unless handling an MMU
* notifier for access tracking. Leaving record_acc_track
@@ -617,12 +621,10 @@ static inline int tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
* Leaving record_dirty_log unset in that case prevents page
* writes from being double counted.
*/
-static inline void __tdp_mmu_set_spte(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
- u64 new_spte, bool record_acc_track,
- bool record_dirty_log)
+static void __tdp_mmu_set_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, tdp_ptep_t sptep,
+ u64 old_spte, u64 new_spte, gfn_t gfn, int level,
+ bool record_acc_track, bool record_dirty_log)
{
- WARN_ON_ONCE(iter->yielded);
-
lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
/*
@@ -632,39 +634,48 @@ static inline void __tdp_mmu_set_spte(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
* should be used. If operating under the MMU lock in write mode, the
* use of the removed SPTE should not be necessary.
*/
- WARN_ON(is_removed_spte(iter->old_spte) || is_removed_spte(new_spte));
+ WARN_ON(is_removed_spte(old_spte) || is_removed_spte(new_spte));
- kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(iter->sptep, new_spte);
+ kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(sptep, new_spte);
+
+ __handle_changed_spte(kvm, as_id, gfn, old_spte, new_spte, level, false);
- __handle_changed_spte(kvm, iter->as_id, iter->gfn, iter->old_spte,
- new_spte, iter->level, false);
if (record_acc_track)
- handle_changed_spte_acc_track(iter->old_spte, new_spte,
- iter->level);
+ handle_changed_spte_acc_track(old_spte, new_spte, level);
if (record_dirty_log)
- handle_changed_spte_dirty_log(kvm, iter->as_id, iter->gfn,
- iter->old_spte, new_spte,
- iter->level);
+ handle_changed_spte_dirty_log(kvm, as_id, gfn, old_spte,
+ new_spte, level);
+}
+
+static inline void _tdp_mmu_set_spte(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
+ u64 new_spte, bool record_acc_track,
+ bool record_dirty_log)
+{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(iter->yielded);
+
+ __tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter->as_id, iter->sptep, iter->old_spte,
+ new_spte, iter->gfn, iter->level,
+ record_acc_track, record_dirty_log);
}
static inline void tdp_mmu_set_spte(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
u64 new_spte)
{
- __tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, new_spte, true, true);
+ _tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, new_spte, true, true);
}
static inline void tdp_mmu_set_spte_no_acc_track(struct kvm *kvm,
struct tdp_iter *iter,
u64 new_spte)
{
- __tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, new_spte, false, true);
+ _tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, new_spte, false, true);
}
static inline void tdp_mmu_set_spte_no_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm,
struct tdp_iter *iter,
u64 new_spte)
{
- __tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, new_spte, true, false);
+ _tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, new_spte, true, false);
}
#define tdp_root_for_each_pte(_iter, _root, _start, _end) \
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-03 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-03 19:38 [PATCH v4 00/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Overhaul TDP MMU zapping and flushing Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 01/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Check for present SPTE when clearing dirty bit in TDP MMU Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 02/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix wrong/misleading comments in TDP MMU fast zap Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 03/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Formalize TDP MMU's (unintended?) deferred TLB flush logic Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 23:39 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 04/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Document that zapping invalidated roots doesn't need to flush Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 05/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Require mmu_lock be held for write in unyielding root iter Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 06/30] KVM: x86/mmu: only perform eager page splitting on valid roots Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 20:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 07/30] KVM: x86/mmu: do not allow readers to acquire references to invalid roots Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 20:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 08/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Check for !leaf=>leaf, not PFN change, in TDP MMU SP removal Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 09/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Batch TLB flushes from TDP MMU for MMU notifier change_spte Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 10/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop RCU after processing each root in MMU notifier hooks Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 11/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Add helpers to read/write TDP MMU SPTEs and document RCU Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 12/30] KVM: x86/mmu: WARN if old _or_ new SPTE is REMOVED in non-atomic path Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 14/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only the target TDP MMU shadow page in NX recovery Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 15/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Skip remote TLB flush when zapping all of TDP MMU Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 16/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Add dedicated helper to zap TDP MMU root shadow page Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-04 0:07 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 17/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Require mmu_lock be held for write to zap TDP MMU range Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-04 0:14 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 18/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only TDP MMU leafs in kvm_zap_gfn_range() Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-04 1:16 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-04 16:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-04 18:00 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-04 18:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 15:09 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-03-13 18:40 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-25 15:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-26 18:10 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-28 15:06 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 19/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Do remote TLB flush before dropping RCU in TDP MMU resched Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-04 1:19 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 20/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Defer TLB flush to caller when freeing TDP MMU shadow pages Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 21/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap invalidated roots via asynchronous worker Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 20:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 21:06 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 21:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 21:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-04 6:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-04 16:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-04 18:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-05 0:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-05 19:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 21:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 17:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 22/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow yielding when zapping GFNs for defunct TDP MMU root Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 23/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap roots in two passes to avoid inducing RCU stalls Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 24/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap defunct roots via asynchronous worker Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 22:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 25/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Check for a REMOVED leaf SPTE before making the SPTE Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 26/30] KVM: x86/mmu: WARN on any attempt to atomically update REMOVED SPTE Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 27/30] KVM: selftests: Move raw KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION helper to utils Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 28/30] KVM: selftests: Split out helper to allocate guest mem via memfd Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 29/30] KVM: selftests: Define cpu_relax() helpers for s390 and x86 Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 30/30] KVM: selftests: Add test to populate a VM with the max possible guest mem Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 14:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 15:36 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-03-08 21:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 17:25 ` [PATCH v4 00/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Overhaul TDP MMU zapping and flushing Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220303193842.370645-14-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).