linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
	Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 22/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow yielding when zapping GFNs for defunct TDP MMU root
Date: Thu,  3 Mar 2022 14:38:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220303193842.370645-23-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220303193842.370645-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>

Allow yielding when zapping SPTEs after the last reference to a valid
root is put.  Because KVM must drop all SPTEs in response to relevant
mmu_notifier events, mark defunct roots invalid and reset their refcount
prior to zapping the root.  Keeping the refcount elevated while the zap
is in-progress ensures the root is reachable via mmu_notifier until the
zap completes and the last reference to the invalid, defunct root is put.

Allowing kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root() to yield fixes soft lockup issues if the
root in being put has a massive paging structure, e.g. zapping a root
that is backed entirely by 4kb pages for a guest with 32tb of memory can
take hundreds of seconds to complete.

  watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#49 stuck for 485s! [max_guest_memor:52368]
  RIP: 0010:kvm_set_pfn_dirty+0x30/0x50 [kvm]
   __handle_changed_spte+0x1b2/0x2f0 [kvm]
   handle_removed_tdp_mmu_page+0x1a7/0x2b8 [kvm]
   __handle_changed_spte+0x1f4/0x2f0 [kvm]
   handle_removed_tdp_mmu_page+0x1a7/0x2b8 [kvm]
   __handle_changed_spte+0x1f4/0x2f0 [kvm]
   tdp_mmu_zap_root+0x307/0x4d0 [kvm]
   kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root+0x7c/0xc0 [kvm]
   kvm_mmu_free_roots+0x22d/0x350 [kvm]
   kvm_mmu_reset_context+0x20/0x60 [kvm]
   kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_sregs+0x5a/0xc0 [kvm]
   kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x5bd/0x710 [kvm]
   __se_sys_ioctl+0x77/0xc0
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1d/0x20
   do_syscall_64+0x44/0xa0
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

KVM currently doesn't put a root from a non-preemptible context, so other
than the mmu_notifier wrinkle, yielding when putting a root is safe.

Yield-unfriendly iteration uses for_each_tdp_mmu_root(), which doesn't
take a reference to each root (it requires mmu_lock be held for the
entire duration of the walk).

tdp_mmu_next_root() is used only by the yield-friendly iterator.

tdp_mmu_zap_root_work() is explicitly yield friendly.

kvm_mmu_free_roots() => mmu_free_root_page() is a much bigger fan-out,
but is still yield-friendly in all call sites, as all callers can be
traced back to some combination of vcpu_run(), kvm_destroy_vm(), and/or
kvm_create_vm().

Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-Id: <20220226001546.360188-21-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index ed1bb63b342d..408e21e4009c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -144,20 +144,46 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 
 	WARN_ON(!root->tdp_mmu_page);
 
-	spin_lock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
-	list_del_rcu(&root->link);
-	spin_unlock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
-
 	/*
-	 * A TLB flush is not necessary as KVM performs a local TLB flush when
-	 * allocating a new root (see kvm_mmu_load()), and when migrating vCPU
-	 * to a different pCPU.  Note, the local TLB flush on reuse also
-	 * invalidates any paging-structure-cache entries, i.e. TLB entries for
-	 * intermediate paging structures, that may be zapped, as such entries
-	 * are associated with the ASID on both VMX and SVM.
+	 * The root now has refcount=0.  It is valid, but readers already
+	 * cannot acquire a reference to it because kvm_tdp_mmu_get_root()
+	 * rejects it.  This remains true for the rest of the execution
+	 * of this function, because readers visit valid roots only
+	 * (except for tdp_mmu_zap_root_work(), which however
+	 * does not acquire any reference itself).
+	 *
+	 * Even though there are flows that need to visit all roots for
+	 * correctness, they all take mmu_lock for write, so they cannot yet
+	 * run concurrently. The same is true after kvm_tdp_root_mark_invalid,
+	 * since the root still has refcount=0.
+	 *
+	 * However, tdp_mmu_zap_root can yield, and writers do not expect to
+	 * see refcount=0 (see for example kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots()).
+	 * So the root temporarily gets an extra reference, going to refcount=1
+	 * while staying invalid.  Readers still cannot acquire any reference;
+	 * but writers are now allowed to run if tdp_mmu_zap_root yields and
+	 * they might take an extra reference is they themselves yield.  Therefore,
+	 * when the reference is given back after tdp_mmu_zap_root terminates,
+	 * there is no guarantee that the refcount is still 1.  If not, whoever
+	 * puts the last reference will free the page, but they will not have to
+	 * zap the root because a root cannot go from invalid to valid.
 	 */
-	tdp_mmu_zap_root(kvm, root, shared);
+	if (!kvm_tdp_root_mark_invalid(root)) {
+		refcount_set(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count, 1);
+		tdp_mmu_zap_root(kvm, root, shared);
+
+		/*
+		 * Give back the reference that was added back above.  We now
+		 * know that the root is invalid, so go ahead and free it if
+		 * no one has taken a reference in the meanwhile.
+		 */
+		if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count))
+			return;
+	}
 
+	spin_lock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
+	list_del_rcu(&root->link);
+	spin_unlock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
 	call_rcu(&root->rcu_head, tdp_mmu_free_sp_rcu_callback);
 }
 
@@ -799,12 +825,23 @@ static inline gfn_t tdp_mmu_max_gfn_host(void)
 static void tdp_mmu_zap_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 			     bool shared)
 {
-	bool root_is_unreachable = !refcount_read(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count);
 	struct tdp_iter iter;
 
 	gfn_t end = tdp_mmu_max_gfn_host();
 	gfn_t start = 0;
 
+	/*
+	 * The root must have an elevated refcount so that it's reachable via
+	 * mmu_notifier callbacks, which allows this path to yield and drop
+	 * mmu_lock.  When handling an unmap/release mmu_notifier command, KVM
+	 * must drop all references to relevant pages prior to completing the
+	 * callback.  Dropping mmu_lock with an unreachable root would result
+	 * in zapping SPTEs after a relevant mmu_notifier callback completes
+	 * and lead to use-after-free as zapping a SPTE triggers "writeback" of
+	 * dirty accessed bits to the SPTE's associated struct page.
+	 */
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!refcount_read(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count));
+
 	kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(kvm, shared);
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
@@ -815,42 +852,16 @@ static void tdp_mmu_zap_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 	 */
 	for_each_tdp_pte_min_level(iter, root, root->role.level, start, end) {
 retry:
-		/*
-		 * Yielding isn't allowed when zapping an unreachable root as
-		 * the root won't be processed by mmu_notifier callbacks.  When
-		 * handling an unmap/release mmu_notifier command, KVM must
-		 * drop all references to relevant pages prior to completing
-		 * the callback.  Dropping mmu_lock can result in zapping SPTEs
-		 * for an unreachable root after a relevant callback completes,
-		 * which leads to use-after-free as zapping a SPTE triggers
-		 * "writeback" of dirty/accessed bits to the SPTE's associated
-		 * struct page.
-		 */
-		if (!root_is_unreachable &&
-		    tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, false, shared))
+		if (tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, false, shared))
 			continue;
 
 		if (!is_shadow_present_pte(iter.old_spte))
 			continue;
 
-		if (!shared) {
+		if (!shared)
 			tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
-		} else if (tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(kvm, &iter, 0)) {
-			/*
-			 * cmpxchg() shouldn't fail if the root is unreachable.
-			 * Retry so as not to leak the page and its children.
-			 */
-			WARN_ONCE(root_is_unreachable,
-				  "Contended TDP MMU SPTE in unreachable root.");
+		else if (tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(kvm, &iter, 0))
 			goto retry;
-		}
-
-		/*
-		 * WARN if the root is invalid and is unreachable, all SPTEs
-		 * should've been zapped by kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_invalidated_roots(),
-		 * and inserting new SPTEs under an invalid root is a KVM bug.
-		 */
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(root_is_unreachable && root->role.invalid);
 	}
 
 	rcu_read_unlock();
-- 
2.31.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-03 19:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-03 19:38 [PATCH v4 00/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Overhaul TDP MMU zapping and flushing Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 01/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Check for present SPTE when clearing dirty bit in TDP MMU Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 02/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix wrong/misleading comments in TDP MMU fast zap Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 03/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Formalize TDP MMU's (unintended?) deferred TLB flush logic Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 23:39   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 04/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Document that zapping invalidated roots doesn't need to flush Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 05/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Require mmu_lock be held for write in unyielding root iter Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 06/30] KVM: x86/mmu: only perform eager page splitting on valid roots Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 20:03   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 07/30] KVM: x86/mmu: do not allow readers to acquire references to invalid roots Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 20:12   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 08/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Check for !leaf=>leaf, not PFN change, in TDP MMU SP removal Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 09/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Batch TLB flushes from TDP MMU for MMU notifier change_spte Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 10/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop RCU after processing each root in MMU notifier hooks Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 11/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Add helpers to read/write TDP MMU SPTEs and document RCU Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 12/30] KVM: x86/mmu: WARN if old _or_ new SPTE is REMOVED in non-atomic path Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 13/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor low-level TDP MMU set SPTE helper to take raw values Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 14/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only the target TDP MMU shadow page in NX recovery Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 15/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Skip remote TLB flush when zapping all of TDP MMU Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 16/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Add dedicated helper to zap TDP MMU root shadow page Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-04  0:07   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 17/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Require mmu_lock be held for write to zap TDP MMU range Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-04  0:14   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 18/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only TDP MMU leafs in kvm_zap_gfn_range() Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-04  1:16   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-04 16:11     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-04 18:00       ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-04 18:42         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 15:09   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-03-13 18:40   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-25 15:13     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-26 18:10       ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-28 15:06         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 19/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Do remote TLB flush before dropping RCU in TDP MMU resched Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-04  1:19   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 20/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Defer TLB flush to caller when freeing TDP MMU shadow pages Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 21/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap invalidated roots via asynchronous worker Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 20:54   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 21:06     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 21:20   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 21:32     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-04  6:48       ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-04 16:02         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-04 18:11           ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-05  0:34             ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-05 19:53               ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 21:29                 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 17:50                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 23/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap roots in two passes to avoid inducing RCU stalls Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 24/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap defunct roots via asynchronous worker Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 22:08   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 25/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Check for a REMOVED leaf SPTE before making the SPTE Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 26/30] KVM: x86/mmu: WARN on any attempt to atomically update REMOVED SPTE Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 27/30] KVM: selftests: Move raw KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION helper to utils Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 28/30] KVM: selftests: Split out helper to allocate guest mem via memfd Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 29/30] KVM: selftests: Define cpu_relax() helpers for s390 and x86 Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 30/30] KVM: selftests: Add test to populate a VM with the max possible guest mem Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 14:47   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 15:36     ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-03-08 21:09     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 17:25 ` [PATCH v4 00/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Overhaul TDP MMU zapping and flushing Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220303193842.370645-23-pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).